#help-13
1 messages · Page 392 of 1
yes can you see this now
yeah..do i divide denominator by sin^3x?
why will you do that tho?
you already have the sin cube in numerator just go w this u sub no?
so that i can get some cos^2 x/ sin^3 x terms which i can write as 1/du
idk bro i was just trying to get u and du somewhere 😭
but what about the cos ^2 x
you can multiply it in numerator and denominator , and see where it gets you ( or you can recognise something regarding this in the denominator)
nope
or is this subjective
just a worksheet my teacher gave
sounds like u dont want me to do that
what do i regocnize
one of your thought process could be like
ah usually options helps a lot , but its fine , you can think of this in this way , how will i integrate tan inverse which is in the denominator , only if i could sub arc tan as t
i do want you to do that , go with your gut while integrating
yep.
this stratement makes more sense if you know the answer , i just realised
but yeah exactly can you see it now
but i still have kind of a mess
du/(u^2+1)arc tan u
and.. whats the derivative of arctan u
1/1+u^2
do i make another sub?
yeah you can technically
oh thats cool
or you could make one sub only which was t = arctan(secx + cosx) directly
but yeah the former is safer aproach
i cant even check the answer
its ok what did you get
oh ok thanks a lot
rieman was the mvp on the u sub
yeah @dire geode could u tell me why u took that for the u sub
i was goingf to suggest t = arctan (secx + cosx ) but that method made it more easier
and also im kinda new to integration..u have any tips?
uhh maybe do the ncert integration thoroughly ( monthly for revision) , it builded my intuition on this
so just 7th chapter
cos^4 + 3cos^2 + 1 looked like it related to (cos + 1/cos)^2
oh ok
but also another usual thing to do when you have a complicated composition like
arctan(f(x)) then just try u=f(x)
Closed by @ember heath
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can anyone help?
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
cant you just write out the components of each vector
and then like calculate it directly
this is how the question goes.
no given components
assume vector A is structured as a vector of (a,b,c) and so on for B and C
You make them up as variables
hello I Want to learn multi variable in calculus can guys tell me a plan
.close
Closed by @cloud sigil
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hellk
Help
go ahead
Idg
See, my tutor doesn5 k ow how to teach and he has us homework and we havent go this far in log
Idg the question
I've tried using the addition law and subtraction law eve power law
I'm not even sure
Pls help
He give us simple examples but hard classwork and homework so that's y idg
Alright so do u know that if two logarithm functions with same base r in addition form ,the values r multiplied
Yep
Waiit a sec
I understand the subtraction law and power law
Alr
So same for two logarithm functions being in subtraction form,they xan be written in divided form
Alr
Can u work on 2 no then
Basing on the subtraction law
Oh alr
Can u tell how u got that
2?
Yea got u
What's happened
But i dont get how u got 100
5² gives u 25
And u have log30 in added form and log9 is subtracted form
So u r supposed to convert log 25 and log30 into multiplied form and then log 9 in divided form
Like tell me what's log25+log30
That's 25 × 30
And log(25×30) -log9?
Oops
Alr 36 then
Now log100 makes sense
Sorry
But dont forget the log
Ok
Let's do 4
Oh no ,u cant do that
Log125-log5=log(125/5)
Not log125/log25
Lemme give u a hint
Use the power rule here
Alr
U mean That's how he taught u?
Or like that was the question he gave u
That's how he gave us the question
The question is alright
Yep
So did u figure it out
Ere
thats 125
,rccw
@velvet gust brb
Brb
Donr put the equals here
Put them at front
And whatver was done here seems correct
But what u did here isnt right
Read this part once more
No, this is the correction to the classwork
Which is a correction to which one
Is this correct for no.4,
Like i said log125 -log 2
5=log125/5
No bro, it's 5 not 25
But u xant right log 125-log 5=log125/log5
Sorry if my hand writing is some how
Yea. Ik
Alr
Thats what i did
But that's what u did,so it's wrong
I true 125 to 5^3 and 5 just like that
Ohn
From the part where i did 5^3 is wrong right
But how
Remember log5³=3log5
Yea
U can take the power to coefficient
So log5 cancels out
So I would just cancel out
So whatever u do after that will automatically be wrong
Ok
Check this
Is it correct
Thxs
Try 5 too
What
Same way
What did u not understand
Wow i m blind
I'll resend
Yes i wrote the same thing
Js pointed out the mistake u did
Log(a/b)=loga/logb
Yea right
No they r not
If u r allowed to use calc u can calculate
Log(5/2) is not equal to log5/log 2
?
Ok the fraction 5/2 which is the base in log
Is not equals to log5/log2
Thxs vic
Yup
Let's try 5
We follow the same procedure herr
Brb
@velvet gust Has your question been resolved?
Ping me once ur back
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
if you want to LaTeX, dollar signs around the math
brandon
ah okay the "stones on chessboard" just makes the problem a bit more complex than necessary
Basically once you pick d, the chessboard is determined by whether $x^3-y^2$ is divisible by d
Element118
essentially, it's asking for the number of solutions to $x^3-y^2\equiv0\pmod{d}$. You can compute locally (for each prime power) and combine.
Element118
The prime factorisation would help because you can combine local solutions for each prime power into a global solution for d (remember chinese remainder theorem?).
brandon
yeah you'll have to consider the prime power factors
might need to start with primes and do hensel lifting
primes is really easy once you know the structure of multiplication mod p
brandon
to count solutions you use CRT
Closed by @strong marten
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
could i get help with this question? im having a little trouble 
23. The subscription prices to a club for men and women are in a ration 4:3. Two men and 5 women pay a total sum of $460. What is the subscription fee for each man?
Closed by @knotty cosmos
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help verifying I don't understand how to start this.
:D
Do you know many trig identities about sin and cos?
Well the quotient identity from that example would probably be useful
@vital jay ||correct me if im wrong, but arent the angles inside the tangents the same value?||
which is why they're equal
Kinda? Depends on the approach you're allowed
Whats the question
Nah by verify they mean show that it holds in general
Any angle +2pi is the same output through trig functions
"verify that I have two apples on me" doesn't mean "there is a probability that I might currently NOT have two apples on me"
It means I need you to check
Like |x| = x isn't true because even though |5| = 5, |-5| =/= -5
Show that it's always true for all values of x
Why is it that any maths concept I keep going back to apples to explain them 
I might consider using the addition formula for tangent:
Which is what they do here, by showing that tan(x)csc(x) = sec(x) regardless of what x is
so how would I verify this
Or 6th
Yeah lol
alternatively, the arguments inside the parenthesees are equal so
these?
Yup!
True-ish; but if I have to describe e.g. turns on a pump, I'd need to be careful
So long as you know what tan(2pi) equals
Actually it's just 0
Because turning something 5 whole turns isn't the same as not turning it at all, even if the end result is that the thing's orientation is the same, for instance - so while the intuition works, it's not really sufficient for a verification/proof
If it were pi/2 or 3pi/2 it would be undefined
But pi and 2pi are both 0
yeah fair
Well if we used one of these formulas?
Well plug tan(2pi-x) into the bottom right formula here!
ye
Yup
Close, remember we're using the difference formula
So b should be x, and the numerator would be tan2pi - tanx
If you're using this formula, you're setting a = 2pi and b = x
ooh
Using the sum identity with b = -x would probably be better
If you're using the addition formula (which is only what I suggested because you have a tan(-x) here),
you'd set a = 2pi and b = -x
Since we want tan(-x) at the end
okay
-# damn my intuition is a gangsta
All good
So sorry about the confusion, but you might actually want to use the sum identity from here
Using a = 2pi and b = -x
oh
Since the original problem wanted us to show tan(2pi-x) = tan(-x)
uhh im lost when do u use difference or sum
So think about doing tan(2pi + (-x) )
(spoilers - they're actually the same formula; just the difference formula comes from the fact that tan(-theta) = - tan(theta), so we can use the addition formula to get the difference formula)
It's really contextual. Like, both of these identities can be used here, but they'll just find different (but equivalent!) results
i think sum would be most straightforward here
So here, because the RHS has (-x) inside the function, we might want to leave this be - so if we let one of the a and b be -x, we could keep that in the function
oh so I can use either one its just in some scenarios one is better to use?
sure, but, just pointing out theres an alternative
yeah, ofc :)
yeeeeee
Looks good to me!
okay so from here what do I do
tan(2pi) equals?
Well remember what we said about tan(2pi)?
0
Plug it in!
So then this equals?
tan(-x)/1-tan(-x)?
almost
Hmm, the issue is in your denomenator
oh
First, for the "this is equal to", replace all the tan(2pi) 's with 0's
(ugh, I hate pluralising expressions)
You did 1 - tan(2pi)tan(-x) = 1 - 0*tan(-x) yeah?
no i just completely got rid of 0
So you gotta remember adding 0 is the same as doing nothing, but multiplying by 0 has effects
yes
-# I swear if at some point I acc write a syllabus that's just filled with apple metaphors, I will NOT be surprised 
yeee
Yup that looks good!
what do I do with the 0 now
Well what's 0 * 5?
0
Or 0 * 100
Or 0 * 1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
Yep!
yep!
Yeah!
and what is anything/1?
just that
yes
-# the amount of shits I give about how big that number is 
I could say -tan(x) right?
but yeeeeee
Well - we've already got tan(-x)
And the RHS of the thing we're asked to check IS tan(-x)
@flint cape if you have some number of apples and you divide them among one person, how much would that person get
While that IS equal to -tan(x), it's not really needed lol
So now you just need to write the whole thing up similar to that example from before!
"And now, on Waes's A(pple) Level Maths, ..."
for sum and difference formulas
do i use them when theres something like cos (90-x)
if theres two numbers in a parantheis
yes
ooh
yee
okay
they are applicable literally anywhere lol
thank you
Just keep in mind those work with + and -
also they're good to know bcz most trig identities (excluding the Pythagorean ones) are derived from them
You've got two angles, you're adding/subtracting them, and you got a trig function of that sum/difference
That's what these formulas do
Sum/difference formulas don't work with cos(a*b)
how would i know when it doesnt work
If there's addition or subtraction they work
when you see + or -, they work. if you dont, they dont work
But multiplication and division are different
ah
honestly I don't even bother memorizing them either, I just rederive them anytime I need them
yeah I havent been memorizing them
ive been just looking at the formula
should i memorize them?
i literally have been engraving them into my brain, too lazy to derive them 
Maybe if you need to for a test
literally on any test I save a corner to draw out this diagram each time 
theres no test for this unit
But otherwise, just looking them up is easier so long as you understand how to use them
I always forget where each angle goes in what sin or cos
either memorize them, or derive them like a nerd pajamamama llama lol
does anyone know what you learn in precalculas
one or the other, either works
ik you learn trig
Polynomials?
so just more alg 2 stuff?
I remember finding a lot of quadratic roots
conic sections
more harder versions
Probably?
someone in a higher grade in my school said that ap precalc is just about graphing the functions
Probably trying to refamiliarize you with ratios and stuff
idk if thats it tho
yeah you're gonna do a lot of graphing
That sounds like it could be true
idk about the ap curriculum - as its new - but I foudn that to be constant in most precalc ones
mm
There's a lot of physical intuition for calculus that comes from graphs, so making sure you're good with graphs sounds like a good thing for precalc to focus on
Closed by @idle marten
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
anyone can give me a starting point to how to solve this question
thanks
draw the radii to the two corners of the pavement
ok one sec
let me redraw
hopefully thats what you meant
my initial reaction is to solve area of the circle and area of the triangle
then just subtract the area of triangle from the area of circle to get the area of remaiing segment
the shaded area
is that not the correct steps?
area of sector, you mean?
area of the entire circle
why the entire circle?
then i could just subtract the area of the triangle
to get the remaining segment area
but if you do that, you have the area of the rest of the circle still inside
you'd have to get the area of the SECTOR and subtract the area of the triangle to get the area of the segment
i mean, you know what the green area is, right...?
secto
ok step 1: get sector area
good
then we use sine law?
but remember that the angle you get from this preliminary calculation might not be the full sector angle
to get the missing angle?
be aware about which angle your current calculation will get you
if you are already aware, you can proceed
ok so far
you don't need to find the third side
you have two sides and one angle. just use the sine law directly
ok
so angle A should be 35.9 deg
now i should be able to solve for the sector area
nono
your work found the green angle. but your sector is green plus red
its the same angle
correct
36*2
why?
cause they are mirrored triangles
more specifically?
cause its a right angle
specifically, it's because the two triangles are similar
in fact, not only are they similar - they share two sides and one angle that's in between those two sides.
they are outright congruent
that has no bearing on why the two angles are equal
but now that you have the full sector angle, do whatever next you need to
but the area is correct right for sector?
looks good except 35.9 x 2 != 72
i encourage you to never round until you reach the final answer
otherwise, you risk compounding the rounding error
as you said, the area of the middle triangle
the diagram is a bit misleading down there
isnt the shaded area the area of the sector?
mhm!
aight gl!
why did you plug 5.4 in the sine law? I thought it's supposed to be 2.7 since we're only considering half of it?
oh wait i didn't even realize
@scenic jolt mistake alert
here
the triangle you are considering has half of the chord, not the entire chord
my bad, i didn't catch that one at first sight
its getting a bit messy. hopefully ou can still understand
this has to be correct
!nosols
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
i already know answer is 1.46...but need to know why
i'm curious. if you decided to find the height of the right triangle, why not just use it to calculate the height without the sine?
why are we multiplying by sine here?
since you are only considering the right triangle here
I think you shouldn't approximate the result of B..
why did i solve the height?
no
if you solved the height, you can just use the most basic area formula
why the need for sine
like i said.... there are like 5 different formulas to solve for area triangle
i get so confused sometimes
yeah but why not go with the simplest hahah
yep
you have b and h
cause i lose track which is the simplest
fair, that happens
and all of them formulas dont seem so simple anymore
it's not about picking the simplest, it's about choosing one that fits which information you have
so is the area correct?
in this case you've got b and h so go for it
did you round 8.7948 to 8.7?
if you wanna round, at least round it to the nearest tenth
but again, i suggest you don't round and just use the full amount
you can bash this into a calc anyway
i know but sometimes there are like 10 decimal numbers
hard to keep track
yea not sure how to store the number in my calc
in that case you could leave it in radical form
i know theres a way but cant be bothered to figure out at the moment
but try not to round until you're done
the more you round in intermediate steps, the more the rounding error in your final answer
yea makes sense
its ok for now...
so now i got area of sector and area of triangle
step 3
easy
sector area - sector triangle
should be final anser
final answer is a bit off but should be close enough
1.46
so to summarize steps
- solve area of sector
- solve area of triangle (plus mirrored side)
- area of sector minus area of triangle = segment
makes sense now why we mirrored the triangle
its so that it covers both sides of the segment
final answer is not exact most likely due to rounding error
sector*
yea..
i think theyre interchangebale terms
i got 2 more then im calling it a night....can i show you next question....all i want to know is general steps
and i will figure out the rest
this is quite involved
how many steps do you see
did you shade that part of the diagram yourself
no its like that
when they say total area of the resulting hole, they want area of the two circles?
try utilizing the fact their center is 10.5 cm apart
my initial tohughts is
find area of the two circles
then subtract that middle section
and i already know we gotta do that same mirroring thing with the triangles like what we did in the last quesiton
somrething like that
i cna figure out specific caluclatoins hopefully on my own
i think once you've gotten the blue line, it's exactly the same
subtract the sector with triangle
isnt the blue line 5cm?
because the distance from both centeres is 10
Step 1: find sector area
Step 2: find triangle area
what do the ymean Do not include two of the hatched area.
i only see one hatched area
is the second half supposed to be hatched as well?
im just going to assume it is
yea
ok im gonna work on
ill close this for now...if i get stuck i will create a new help...thanks again everyone. you're the beset. 🫶
btw the formula for the area of a triangle is bh/2 and no additional multiplication with sine
i know
but i get confused sometimes on which formula is best to use
causes theres like so many of them
but ill try to keep that in mind for future questions
.done
.close sir
.close
Closed by @scenic jolt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i basically calculated area of circle of one of the circles
calculate sector area of one of the circles
then subtracted sector area from circle area
to get area of remaining minus sector area
then just multiplied by 2 to get area of both circles minus their sectors
if anyone cares to review my work would be much appreciated
caues something is def wrong
I think, based on what you said, your calculation is wrong
which part
You should find the total area drilled out
Not the area without overlaping part or the sector which overlaps
It should be circle1 + circle2 - overlapping sector
so isnt that just the area of the two circles then?
It isn't, since in circle1 + circle2 you summed the overlapping area twice
hmm
ok so i need to find the area of the shaded bit in the centre
mult by 2
and then basically subtract from the area of the 2 circles
basicallt what you said
Yes
can you give me 3 mins
i should be able to come up with an answer
half the work should be already done
Sure thing, take your time 😃
Let me calculate shaded sector area myself to check
my work is all over the place sorry
basically
step 1: solve sector area for one of the circles
step 2: solve the triangle area for one of the circles
step 3: solve for shaded area (middle section) by sector area - triangle area
What angle did you get between?
Okay 97.7209° is the whole angle or?
yea the full angle for the sector
I got the circle sector be 49,25 approximately (the thing shaped like a cake piece)
What angle is 97.7209°?
Okay the whole thing is 97
ya
yea exactlyt
28,62 for triangle
So then shaded area should be 20,63
321,65 the final answer?
How do you know it's wrong?
cause its not part of the MC options
Okay but what if the question setter made a mistake?
i mean...its possible but i think more likely its a mistake on my part
what did you get?
Same as you
But please
Check it with your colleagues too
Maybe i overlooked something
thats the correct answer
we're close but i wouldnt say close enough
so i dont think its a rounding error
We got 321,25?
It's a mistake on question setter's part, they mixed 1 and 7 on that right hand side keyboard
Np, check with your other colleagues too, they probably found the same mistake
@scenic jolt Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
this was translated so tell me if you dont understand something, can anyone solve C and D or show me how to do it
@formal depot Has your question been resolved?
you might want to go on the physics server
.close
Closed by @formal depot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey
How do I calculate this limit?
This is one of those indetetminate cases where it's 0/0
So, I should have to evaluate the lateral limits right
Yeah u r on right track
Plugging in x as -3
it works
Gives u an answer
Hm
No no, it's completely avoidable
yeah it is
But then it's 3-(-3)
Which is 3+3=6
Yep that's ur answer
Well
But
Your function has simplified to -x + 3, right? So, what's the limit when x → -3?
solutions might be wrong idk
Ohh that's a typo then, for sure
i got this on mathematica
Really?
Yes
Ok thank god haha
yeah definitely
Yep unless the question had a mistake
Cause I did this↑
But then checked solutions and ut wasn't correct
So I got confused hahah
yeah you are correct tho so good job
Ok
is this a valid reasoning though?:
Cause like
In $\frac{(-x+3)(x+3)}{x+3}$
I can't just plug in -3
Since that would be dividing by 0
stoicindiehacker369
So↑
U r allowed to do simplification so that u can get something defined
Oh wait, yeah I can do that
It was just messing with my head
Cause
-3 doesn't belong to the function domain
But I forgot that doesn't really matter😅
Because the limit doesn't need to belong to the domain of the function
Ok
Thanks!
.close
Closed by @ornate echo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello ,srry bro didnt see
.close9someoen was typing)
Closed by @true sapphire
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
dang, someone who actually understands Discord 🫡
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help
!da2a
No need to ask “Can I ask…?” or “Does anyone know about…?”—it’s faster for everyone if you just ask your question! See https://dontasktoask.com/
why did you have to film it like a video like that
watch it makes me want to throw up(i have slight motion sickness)
Ho2 to solve
what is the question
2nd pic
,rcw
Crazy
I m trying
how big is the n+1-th triangle compared to the nth one?
Ye
huh?
look at the first and second triangle, and then the second and third. only look at the edges, not the stuff within.
Closed by @marsh phoenix
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hey, they want me to find a min k in which p(x) + k will be >=0
so i did p'(x) and found that x=3 gives a local minimum
yeh but how can i prove that x=3 is global minimum
it is not a global minimum
p(x) is a cubic equation
question looks sus, what's the exact wording?
the lim as it goes to -inf is -inf and as it goes to inf is inf
theres no global minimum
oh
oh lol
yep
then you must check all possible minimums
u mean i need to do p4 p0 and p3 and p1
nah you should first find out all monotonic intervals and find out values at certain points
cuz x=1 and x=3 are which f'(x)=0
im going to control my colon 3 instincts
is there a quicker way or is it the safest one?
so youre sayin this aint necessary at all
for me to show that p3 is the global minimum
but i need some way to find a k in which p(x) + k >=0 in the interval [0,4]
global minimum will help isnt it right?
yes, p(3)
well then you must solve p(3)+k>=0
p(3)<=p(x) for every x
p(3)=-4
-4<=p(x) for every x
so then -4 + 4 <= p(x)+k (in which k=4) will make p(x)+k>=-4+4=0 @old dirge
for every x
i can say this only when ik that p3 is the global minimum
am i good ^^ ?
in the interval [0,4]
global minimum in the interval [0,4]
but otherwise it's correct