#help-13

1 messages · Page 390 of 1

dire geode
#

Use Google instead

slender ginkgo
#

The number bigger the bloody avogrado’s constant

fallen needle
#

.close

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @fallen needle

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

mortal yarrow
#

is the derivative operator linear?

cedar kilnBOT
mental trail
#

yes

#

d/dx (af + bg) = a df/dx + b dg/dx

lone dune
#

by the way for short and quick questions like this asking google is probably faster and more efficient than asking here

cedar kilnBOT
#

@mortal yarrow Has your question been resolved?

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

cedar kilnBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

fallen needle
#

is the power set of aleph null bigger then aleph null

dusky panther
#

yes, it's the real numbers

fallen needle
#

k .close

#

.close

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @fallen needle

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

cedar kilnBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

chilly wyvern
#

can i have help

cedar kilnBOT
vital herald
#

You're on your own for this one

past sable
#

😭

#

get the nerdiest guy here

vital herald
past sable
#

guys i need help

vital herald
#

From chatgpt

past sable
#

solve the collatz conjuncture

vital herald
#

theoretically its 1

rapid mauve
cedar kilnBOT
indigo lagoon
mint inlet
#

like why are you integrating alpha from 0 to infty but then you're summing from 0 to alpha-1

#

that makes no sense

vital herald
mint inlet
#

chatgpt (sent above) is right that since the numerator and denominator only differ in this circled part, you can probably phrase it as the expected value of the circled part over some probability distribution parameterized by alpha and beta

#

also the circled part is a partial taylor series so it should approach 1 as alpha goes to infinity

#

but i still think the expression as whole is nothing more than notational nonsense as written

cedar kilnBOT
#

@chilly wyvern Has your question been resolved?

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

meager dock
#

hey so i was doing $-1/4+5/4-2+21$

cedar kilnBOT
wraith daggerBOT
meager dock
#

i wanted to simplify

#

so i multiplied everything by 4

#

to get -1+5-8+84

#

=80

#

but apparantly

#

its wrong

void sand
#

you can't just multiply everything by 4

#

that's changing the expression

#

and thus the final answer

meager dock
#

its supposed to be 20

void sand
#

indeed

#

try focusing on simplify the first two terms first

#

-1/4 + 5/4

meager dock
#

find the remainder when

#

2x+1

meager dock
#

but like

#

what if its a harder fraction

void sand
#

I'm confused as to what your original problem is

meager dock
#

like -5/80 + 2/79

rapid mauve
#

i feel like this warrants an

#

!xy

cedar kilnBOT
#

Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.

void sand
#

you can always take a common denominator where suitable anyways

#

but this doesn't seem to be your concern?

meager dock
#

The expression 2x^3+ax^2+bx+21 has a factor of x+3 and leaves a remainder of 65 when divided by x-2.
a) Find the values of a and b
b)Find the value of the remainder when the expression is divided by 2x+1

meager dock
#

a=5

#

and

#

b=4

#

then for b)

#

i put it

#

like

#

2x^3+5x^2+4x+21

#

f(-1/2)=2(-1/2)^3+5(-1/2)^2+4(-1/2)+21

#

to get the remainder

#

this got me to

#

-1/4 +5/4-2+21

#

which i wanted to simplify

meager dock
void sand
#

okay, this looks good to me

void sand
meager dock
#

and i tend to mess up

#

so its easier for me to convert it into integers

#

and then solve it

#

but as you said

void sand
#

you can't do that all the time, unfortunately

meager dock
#

i cant do it since it is not an equation

void sand
#

there's no such thing as "converting a fraction to an integer" - that's just changing the number involved

meager dock
#

wait!

#

it IS an equation

void sand
#

the best you can do is force all the terms to have a common denominator so that the numerator and denominators are integers you can add separately

meager dock
#

f(-1/2)=-1/4+5/4-2+21

#

multiply f(1/2) by 4 too!

void sand
#

sure, you can do that

meager dock
#

wait that would change it ;/

dapper jolt
#

im so sorry for interrupting but after this may someone help me with my math rpoblem? thanks !

void sand
meager dock
#

it would be

void sand
meager dock
#

f(-1/8)=80

void sand
#

so divide both sides by 4 to get f(-1/2)

void sand
#

the constant doesn't go into the function

meager dock
#

but we want -1/2

void sand
#

you are getting f(-1/2)

#

the input of f is -1/2!

#

you're just multiplying the entire result by 4

meager dock
#

-1/2 factorial?

void sand
#

which you can later divide to get rid of

rapid mauve
#

just wanna put this here

void sand
meager dock
#

4(f-1/2)=

void sand
meager dock
#

4x80

void sand
#

not f(-1/2)

meager dock
#

ohhhhhhh

void sand
#

so f(-1/2) = 20

#

after you divide both sides of the equation by 4 :p

meager dock
#

thanks :D

#

.close

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @meager dock

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

meager dock
#

.reopen

cedar kilnBOT
#

meager dock
#

sorry

#

just got another question

#

The function f(x)=ax^3+4x^2+bx-2, where a and b are constants, is such that 2x-1 is a factor. Given that the remainder when f(x) is divided by x-2 is twice the remainder when f(x) is divided by x+1.find the value of a and b.

#

Seia please help me

#

and higher!

mint inlet
#

you can do the same thing as the other problem

tropic oxide
#

is it just those 2 ppl you want help from and nobody else thonk

meager dock
#

no

#

anyone

mint inlet
#

i know the phrasing of the problem seems more intimidating, since it says "this value is twice this other" instead of giving you the exact values

#

but try using the same method

meager dock
#

but i can understand what Seia says because she uses simple terms

#

and otheer ppl use complex

#

which i dont get

dusk goblet
#

seia literally said nothing

mint inlet
#

yeah

dusk goblet
#

i cant imagine being a woman on discord

#

🤣

meager dock
#

what

mint inlet
#

r is kind of annoying here

#

because it's this extra variable to worry about

#

that's not really related to the problem

#

so what you can do here is combine these

#

in a way that allows you to forget about r

#

do you see how?

meager dock
#

im still finding out f(-1) and f(2) and f(-1/2)

mint inlet
#

yeah, that's is your way of writing the remainders in terms of the polynomial

mint inlet
#

can you see how to directly relate f(-1) and f(2), without involving this extra variable r?

meager dock
#

no

rapid mauve
#

hint: substitute

meager dock
#

i got all the equations

#

f(-1/2)=-a-4b=8
f(2)=8a+2b+14=2R
f(-1)=-a-b+2=R

#

simultaneous equation?

tropic oxide
meager dock
#

8a+2b+24=2R
-2a-2b+4=2R
6a+28=3R

rapid mauve
#

thought we were out to eliminate r

tropic oxide
#

i think it would have been easier to write f(2) = 2*f(-1) to begin with

meager dock
#

what difference would that have made?

#

oh it wouldve been easier

meager dock
mint inlet
#

as seia suggested, do you see a nice way to use substitution to combine the 2nd and 3rd equations?

meager dock
#

?

meager dock
mint inlet
#

does this make sense?

meager dock
#

yes

mint inlet
#

ok

#

we want to get rid of R

meager dock
#

-R and 2R from RHS of both equations

#

?

#

no cuz that would add it to the lhs

knotty ruin
#

what does reopen do?

rapid mauve
knotty ruin
#

sorry

mint inlet
meager dock
#

f(-1)=2(f(-1)?

rapid mauve
#

almost there!

#

but uh you substituted f(-1) instead

meager dock
#

do i replace the f(-1) with the actual equation

#

-a-b+2=-2a-2b+4

rapid mauve
#

no

meager dock
#

oh f(-1)=2f(2)

rapid mauve
#

oh i think i swapped the f(2) and f(-1)

#

reverse the f(-1) and f(2), my bad

#

i just reread your question

meager dock
#

f(2)=2f(-1)

rapid mauve
#

there we go

#

no more r's

#

you can now continue with fly's guide

meager dock
#

8a+2b+14=-a-b+2?

tropic oxide
#

hold up

#

who is twice whom?

rapid mauve
#

my mistake

meager dock
#

7a+3b=-12
-a-4b=8??

rapid mauve
#

nuked the image to prevent misunderstanding

meager dock
rapid mauve
#

where did that come from

meager dock
#

shifted like terms to the lhs

meager dock
#

and the second one is

#

f(-1/2)

#

.close

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @meager dock

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

cedar kilnBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

supple rose
cedar kilnBOT
supple rose
#

help i hate this chapter

spark mist
supple rose
#

its there

spark mist
#

dawg im stupid asl

#

alr sorry

supple rose
#

its okay vro

spark mist
gritty saddle
#

just statistics

spark mist
#

for a you can think it as

#

first you can choose 8 person

#

then you can choose 7 person

#

you will get 8 * 7 * 6 * 5 * 4 * 3

#

do you understand why we only stop until 3 ?

supple rose
#

um why?

spark mist
#

simplex example

#

You have 2 friends you want to pick 1 to be your teamates how many way can you pick

supple rose
#

2?

spark mist
#

nice

#

thats right

#

imagine if you have 3 friend and you want to pick 1 to be your teammate ?

supple rose
#

um

#

wait

#

man idk

#

is it 3! ?

spark mist
#

yes

supple rose
#

oh so the answer is 6

tranquil oracle
#

Is that 3 factorial

spark mist
#

no it is not 3!

#

just 3

tranquil oracle
#

Its just 3 choices

#

If you want, give the friends names

#

Alice, Bob, Carl

3 possibilities: You+Alice, You+Bob, You+Carl

supple rose
#

so..

#

i got 3 ways to pick one as my teammate

spark mist
#

if you want to choose 2 from alice bob carl

#

you can see this as

#

first you have 3 choice

#

lets assume you pick bob

#

then you are left with with alice and carl

#

you now have 2 choice

#

either alice or carl

#

so algebraicly the way to pick 2 person from 3 person is 3 * 2

#

do you understand this

supple rose
#

mhm

#

let see i got 3 slots

#

in the first slot i can choose one of the three friends

spark mist
#

yep

supple rose
#

so in the second slot i can only choose one of them twos bcuz i already chose one

spark mist
#

your intuition is very good here

supple rose
#

ah i see

spark mist
#

now lets apply to 8 person

#

in the first slot you have 8 choice

#

the second slot you have 7 choice (why)?

#

why for every slot we go it decrease by 1

supple rose
#

bcuz theyre are different choices?

#

in 2 slots cant be the same person

spark mist
spark mist
#

we need to rephrase it

#

because you already pick 1

#

you already choose someone in the first slot

#

since then we cant have that person again

supple rose
#

mhm

#

i get that

#

like 1st slot, 8 choices

#

2nd slot, 7 choices

#

and so on

spark mist
#

yeah

#

but remember you can only have 6 slot

#

since you want to pick 6 person

supple rose
#

so number of choices = 8, number of available slots = 6 ?

spark mist
#

yeah

#

can you count it now

supple rose
#

1st slot, 8 choices
2nd slot, 7 choices

6th slot, 3 choices

spark mist
#

sooo

supple rose
#

8!/2!

#

is that right?

spark mist
#

👍

supple rose
#

woww

#

so it should be 20160 ways

spark mist
#

yeah

#

alr we are done for part a

#

lets do part b

supple rose
#

yes

spark mist
#

b just mean

#

pick at minimum 5 girl

#

for 6 person team

#

do you understand if i say

#

pick 5 girl and 1 boy

#

pick 6 girl

supple rose
#

no

#

why you add them?

spark mist
#

you know what

#

we could not add them

#

since the question is ask for minimum 5 girls

#

we can just pick 5 grils

#

and just pick 1 from the rest of the team which is 12 person (17-5)

#

so use the same logic for the last question

#

but for the sixth slot we have 12 choice

supple rose
#

um wait

#

the question says at least 5 girls

spark mist
#

so the last person can be boys or girls right ?

supple rose
#

so in a team could be 5 girls 1 boy or 6 girls

spark mist
#

thatt's what i mean by add them

supple rose
#

mhmm

#

i see

#

but idk how to do it

spark mist
#

you can solve it

supple rose
#

let me try..

#

im sorry if it takes too long

spark mist
#

yo its okay

#

as long as you understand

supple rose
#

mhm

spark mist
#

if you need hint

#

remember you can choose 5 girls first then add 1 boy

#

then choose 6 girls

#

add the result

#

and that is the answer

supple rose
#

can i use 5 slots for 9 different girls and then add 1 slots for 8 different boys?

#

and add 6 slots for 9 girls

spark mist
#

yep

#

that is the right intuition

supple rose
#

so 9!/4! + 8!/7! + 9!/3! ?

spark mist
supple rose
#

the answer is 75608

spark mist
supple rose
#

lets gooooo

#

thank you smm🙏🙏

spark mist
#

no problem

cedar kilnBOT
#

@supple rose Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @supple rose

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

wary pond
#

ive been stuck here for some time

cedar kilnBOT
wary pond
#

can i have a hint on where to start

ancient cliff
#

complete the square

cedar kilnBOT
#

@wary pond Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @wary pond

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

wary pond
cedar kilnBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

small parrot
#

Yo

cedar kilnBOT
small parrot
#

Guys high school is starting

#

How do I get perfectly good grades

#

Cause I Wana move at 16

#

And I'm 14

#

And my mom won't let me go if I don't have good grades

tropic oxide
small parrot
#

😑

#

Kk

#

Th

#

Ty

ancient cliff
#

!done

cedar kilnBOT
#

If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close

dusty wren
#

If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close MenheraThumbsUp3

livid marlin
#

.close

cedar kilnBOT
#

@small parrot Has your question been resolved?

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

meager dock
#

Find the values of p and of q such that $15x^3+26x^2-11x-6$ is a factor of 15x^4+px^3-37x^2+qx+6

wraith daggerBOT
#

Tan
Compile Error! Click the errors reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)

tropic oxide
#

15 minute rule etc...

#

progress?

meager dock
#

oh sorry

meager dock
tropic oxide
#

ok here is a trick

meager dock
#

i cant figure out what to do

tropic oxide
#

you know that this quartic must be equal to the product of the cubic and a linear

#

or to put it in less vague terms

#

15x^4+px^3-37x^2+qx+6 = (15x^3+26x^2-11x-6) * (LINEAR)

#

do you understand why? y/n

#

don't try to do anything from here yet

#

only tell me whether you understand this one step

tropic oxide
#

right

#

here's the neat thing...

#

you can work out the linear factor just by looking at the leading & constant terms

meager dock
#

i dont need to do trial and error?

tropic oxide
#

no trial and error needed.

meager dock
#

how

#

15 3 26 -11 and 6

tropic oxide
#

look at the leading terms

#

15x^4 will arise as the product of 15x^3 with the leading term in the linear

meager dock
#

the coefficients of x?

tropic oxide
meager dock
#

so the first constant of our linear is x?

tropic oxide
#

that's not what the word "degree" means.

tropic oxide
meager dock
#

1?

tropic oxide
#

i said no trial and error.

meager dock
#

cuz the coefficient is not changing

tropic oxide
#

now we instead look at the constant terms

meager dock
#

15 into 1 =15

tropic oxide
#

6 will arise as the product of -6 with the linear factor's constant term

meager dock
#

oh

tropic oxide
meager dock
#

i meant it as the second constant of the linear

tropic oxide
#

then no it's not 1

#

-6 * (what) = 6?

meager dock
#

-1

tropic oxide
#

right

#

so we have just reconstructed the linear factor

#

as x-1

#

15x^4+px^3-37x^2+qx+6 = (15x^3+26x^2-11x-6) * (x-1)

#

now it is easy, yes?

meager dock
#

yes

#

i can divide 15x^3+26x^2-11x-6 by x-1

tropic oxide
#

no

#

no!!!!!

#

why divide!

#

why divide?!?!

meager dock
#

to get quadratic

tropic oxide
#

no!!!!

#

no!!! you're overthinking it!!!

#

15x^4+px^3-37x^2+qx+6 = (15x^3+26x^2-11x-6) × (x-1)

#

not division

#

multiplication

#

literally just work out the multiplication on the rhs

#

no need for any division at all

#

do you hear me @meager dock

meager dock
#

the final answer i got is

#

15x^4+11x^3-37x^2+5x+6

tropic oxide
#

let's verify it...

#

,w expand (15x^3+26x^2-11x-6) * (x-1)

meager dock
#

,w simplify (15x^3+26x^2-11x-6)(x-1)

tropic oxide
#

yup looks good

meager dock
#

im just doubtful about this

tropic oxide
#

what's causing you doubt

meager dock
#

for the first linear constant you look at the coefficients of x with the highest degree and for the second constant you look at the constants?

#

its worded terribly but i think you get my point?

tropic oxide
#

well you're right the wording is terrible

meager dock
#

if it was a x^5 then i would have to find a quadratic

#

i would get the first term by looking at the x^5 and x^4

#

but what about the second?

tropic oxide
#

well ok here is how you can make it a bit more formal

#

instead of trying to remember and then misremember what comes from what, you just write down the unknown linear factor the honest way ie as ax+b

#

and then expand the honest way

#

only you can still note that you care only about the two extreme terms (highest power and lowest power)

meager dock
#

but what if it were not a quartic

meager dock
#

+middle terms=15x^4 + middle terms

#

how would you find the middle term of the quadratic

#

so now we care about the 15x^5+11x^4+middle terms+6=15x^4+11x^3+middle terms-6

tropic oxide
#

well then the unknown quadratic is ax^2+bx+c so you need 3 conditions to get 3 coefficients back

#

so you may want to start caring about one of those middle terms

#

maybe the second-highest power or the second-lowest power

#

i will not generalize further

meager dock
#

i see

#

thank you

#

.close

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @meager dock

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

granite rose
#

Bonjour Ann
Help me with that LA question in the other channel lol

granite rose
#

Which one

#

I already asked 2 helpers and nobody responded

#

.reopen

wicked mantle
#

Nvm, claim a new channel

flint cape
#

And LEAVE IT OPEN, it's fruitless closing it literal minutes afterwards

tropic oxide
granite rose
cedar kilnBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

dusty wren
#

@wanton tinsel you can post your question here

wanton tinsel
#

oh

dusty wren
#

ok, so can you find the lengths AB,BC,CD,DA

wanton tinsel
#

yeah

#

distance formula ig

wicked mantle
wanton tinsel
#

??

dusty wren
wanton tinsel
#

kinda confusing

dusty wren
#

y

wanton tinsel
#

ok lemme

wicked mantle
cedar kilnBOT
#

@dusty wren Has your question been resolved?

wanton tinsel
#

i did it

#

but

wicked mantle
#

YESSSS!!! Can u show me ur work?

wanton tinsel
#

i have doubt on a other que

wanton tinsel
wicked mantle
#

Oh, go ahead 🙂

wicked mantle
wanton tinsel
#

(0,-3 ) (0,3) are vertices of equlateral triangle find the third point

indigo lagoon
wanton tinsel
#

yeah

modern estuary
#

There are two possible locations for the third point

wanton tinsel
#

+,- ?

modern estuary
#

Just imagine an equilateral triangle with one side (0,-3) (0,3)

wanton tinsel
#

yeah im

indigo lagoon
#

@wanton tinsel with this sketch, can you tell me how many possible points will be?

#

To satisify the requirement

wanton tinsel
#

equlateral triagle = 3 points

indigo lagoon
wanton tinsel
#

2 wihc is +y and -y

#

idk if right cuz that might be the only posityon on the cartesian plane

indigo lagoon
#

Good job

#

any idea about how to find them?

wanton tinsel
#

yeah

#

lemme send smg wait

indigo lagoon
wanton tinsel
#

AB = BC = CA

#

36= some equations

#

36=0

#

🙁

indigo lagoon
#

alr, I'll give you some hints before fully reveal the solution

wanton tinsel
#

okay

indigo lagoon
#

Hint No.1

wanton tinsel
#

when did it become right angle triangle 🥀🙏🏻

indigo lagoon
#

we simply draw a line that is perpenduliar to AB

wanton tinsel
#

okay

indigo lagoon
#

3 minutes and I'll give u the next hint

wanton tinsel
#

pythagoras ?

#

gtg 🙁

indigo lagoon
flint cape
#

I can tell your intuition's right - that the two possible points are either side of this line

#

And that they're on an axis

wanton tinsel
#

yeah

flint cape
#

But if they're left or right of the line - which coordinate changes?

#

The x or the y?

wanton tinsel
#

☠️

#

both

#

-y +x

#

then ??

indigo lagoon
#

Let's take it slow

wanton tinsel
#

i gotta go bathroom 🙁

indigo lagoon
#

just draw it

indigo lagoon
wanton tinsel
#

imma hold for a while 💀

indigo lagoon
#

Will you be back later?

wanton tinsel
#

-y -x ?

#

sorry

flint cape
wanton tinsel
#

idk... 🥀

flint cape
#

Well shit.

indigo lagoon
#

it's ok, forget it for now

#

go to the restroom first

wanton tinsel
#

gonna ask my friend

indigo lagoon
#

If you find it frustrating, I can guide you in vc

#

you're almost there

wanton tinsel
#

dm

indigo lagoon
#

DM my main acc

#

@wicked mantle

cedar kilnBOT
#

@dusty wren Has your question been resolved?

dusty wren
#

uhh

#

ig

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @dusty wren

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

wicked bane
#

option 1 incorrect: leading zero
option 2: first row has leading zeros and no constants incorrect
option 3 : incorrect coeffiecents on third row
option 4: second and third row have incorrect coffecients
option 5 no constants
option 6 no constants
no options are correct
4

surreal cave
wicked bane
#

.close

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @wicked bane

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

wicked bane
#

part a)
2t−36≥0⟹t≥18,−3t+63≥0⟹t≤21
G=18
H=21
part b)
C(t)=550(2t−36)+650(−3t+63)+1350t
t(18,21)
x1 = (2(18)-36) = 0
x2=-3(18)+63=9

#

x3=18

#

C(18) =550(2(18)−36)+650(−3(18)+63)+1350(18) = 30150

#

4

#

.reopen

cedar kilnBOT
#

wicked bane
#

@surreal cave

#

<@&286206848099549185>

#

.close

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @wicked bane

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

dull plover
cedar kilnBOT
dull plover
#

i wanna know

#

how is this even valid

#

how do we rewrite (ap + bq) ^x as (ap)^x + (bq)^x

abstract breach
#

what is N

dull plover
#

N = p * q

abstract breach
#

are p, q primes?

dull plover
#

and both p and q are primes

#

yea

abstract breach
#

have you tried expanding (ap+bq)^x

dull plover
#

wdym

abstract breach
#

mb I forgot how to say it in english

dull plover
#

i can expand it but what difference would it make

abstract breach
#

try it

dull plover
#

e1e2 are too large

#

😭

abstract breach
#

do you know the sigma notation for sums

dull plover
#

yea

#

we can expand it with the binomial theorem

#

but i still don't understand where ur going with this

abstract breach
#

and newton binomial formula?

dull plover
#

the first term would be (ap)^e1e2, and the rest would be the sum from 1 to e1e2 (ap)^e1e2-k * (bp)^k

abstract breach
#

yes

#

now look at the terms inside the sum

dull plover
#

what about them

abstract breach
#

what is their value mod N

dull plover
#

[0, N-1]

abstract breach
#

you can calculate their exact value

#

recall that N = pq

dull plover
#

we got the left side and right side

#

left side is (ap)^e1e2-k

#

p ^ anything is going to be 0 mod N

#

because N divides p

abstract breach
#

not quite

dull plover
#

mmmmmmm

abstract breach
#

p divides N, not the opposite

dull plover
#

yeah that's what i meant

abstract breach
#

but then it's not 0 mod N: you have to look at the right side as well

dull plover
#

thing is

#

thats true for p ^ anything mod N

#

but we got a constant being multiplied with p

#

so the value of the left side is going to be just the constant alone

#

and im guessing same thing with the right side

#

so a * b mod N

#

i think?

#

wait no

abstract breach
#

no, p^anything is not 0 mod N (for example p^1 = p is not 0)

dull plover
#

(ap)^e1e2-k * (bp)^k

a^e1e2-k * p^e1e2-k * b^k * q^k

a^e1e2-k * b^k

dull plover
#

well N is pq

#

so to be able to know the value i need to group the p and q together

abstract breach
#

exactly

dull plover
#

but idk

#

they're both raised to different exponents

abstract breach
#

the thing is: if e1e2-k >= 1 and k >= 1, you have pq in your product

#

thus N divides

dull plover
#

yeah but do i not also have a and b

#

imagine if Y = q

#

how can we say aq^x % Y divides

#

if it was q^x % Y i'd get it

abstract breach
#

q divides aq^x

dull plover
#

oh wai

#

t

#

uyeah

#

yeah yeah that makes perfect sense

#

so that sum entirely gives 0 under mod

#

and we're left with the first term of the expansion

#

(ap)^e1e2

#

wait so

#

im assuming

#

(bq)e1e2

#

is the last term of the expansion

#

correct?

#

this way we cut the all the lone terms from the expansion

#

so everything else left returns 0 mod N

#

yeah i think that's the case

abstract breach
#

yes

dull plover
#

thank you so much !!

#

have a wonderful day

#

!close

#

ooop

#

.close

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @dull plover

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

cedar kilnBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

mellow thistle
#

suppose to be 1.496x10^7

cedar kilnBOT
honest field
#

check the units

mellow thistle
#

1496000?????

void sand
mellow thistle
#

14960000000????

#

I thought a million has 7 variables not 11

#

I don't understand

honest field
#

by the time you finish counting all the 0s climate change will destroy us all

mellow thistle
#

It's a million

#

I'm not stupid

#

A million has 7 variables

dusty wren
#

variables?

mellow thistle
#

For your case, numbers

#

Or digits

#

Or numeral

#

or integer

tropic oxide
#

one million is 10^6.

mellow thistle
#

1,000,000 = x10^7

tropic oxide
#

keep in mind also that you're converting from km to m, which picks up 3 more orders of magnitude,
and then finally 149.6 = 1.496 * 10^2

rapid mauve
#

,w 1 million in scientific notation

mellow thistle
#

oh

rapid mauve
#

,w 149.6 million in scientific notation

rapid mauve
#

,w 149.6 million km in scientific notation

tropic oxide
#

149.6 million km, in meters, becomes:

1.496 * 10^2 * 10^6 * 10^3 m

rapid mauve
#

,w 149.6 million km in scientific notation in meters

wraith daggerBOT
rapid mauve
#

wth

mellow thistle
#

I just thought of the rules of scientific figures like "Non-zero digits are always significant."

tropic oxide
#

this is not about significant figures at all

mellow thistle
#

so I thought you count 1 in 1,000,000 as x10^7

tropic oxide
#
  • 1.496 * 10^2 is 149.6
  • 10^6 is million
  • 10^3 is a kilometer in meters
#

therefore,

149.6 million km, in meters, becomes:

1.496 * 10^2 * 10^6 * 10^3 m

#

do you understand

mellow thistle
#

Ohhhh

#

So 149.6 million is 1496000000000???

rapid mauve
#

,w 1496000000000 in scientific notation

tropic oxide
mellow thistle
#

But you do not count the non zero digits

tropic oxide
#

the units are important too

#

forget about digits

#

literally forget about digits

mellow thistle
#

This is ridiculous

tropic oxide
#

this is not about sigfigs and never was about sigfigs

mellow thistle
#

1,000,000 is x10^6 making it a million

#

but when it's 1496000000 it's not a million

#

This is already confusing

#

How can I differenciate

#

And why are they not the same

#

Why is it not valid?

tropic oxide
#

1 million = 1,000,000
2 million = 2,000,000
2.5 million = 2,500,000
25 million = 25,000,000

mellow thistle
#

149,600,000?

tropic oxide
#

that's the number 149.6 million written out longhand yes

mellow thistle
#

149.6 x10^9

dusty wren
#

No

#

Those are 6 places, not 9

low edge
#

this is like the argument sketch by monty python

prisma pike
#

149,600,000=149.6x10^6

mellow thistle
#

So significant figure do not count the non zero digits?

tropic oxide
#

i think you're confused about the concept of significant figures and we're not able to relieve this confusion

mellow thistle
#

I cannot help myself

#

I don't know how to not be confused

#

I can't understand

prisma pike
#

What is one million long form

mellow thistle
#

Idfk if this is normal or I am having a mental disability

#

1,000,000

prisma pike
#

What is 10^1

mellow thistle
#

1?

prisma pike
#

No

mellow thistle
#

10

prisma pike
#

Yes

#

When you take a^x you are multiplying a by itself x times

#

So 10^1=10, 10^2=10x10, 10^3=10x10x10

#

And so on

#

So what is 10^2

mellow thistle
#

100

prisma pike
#

10^3

mellow thistle
#

1000

prisma pike
#

10^6

mellow thistle
#

1000000

prisma pike
#

So 1 million= 10^6

#

I did it gang let's go

#

Sorry I mean you did it gang

#

Let's gooo🔥

mellow thistle
#

I think I need to see a hospital because I feel like I'm not normal not understanding it at the beginning

prisma pike
low edge
#

now all you have to do is say that 149.6 million is 149.6 times one million. ergo, 149.6×10^6

low edge
mellow thistle
flint cape
#

Because you're not done yet

flint cape
flint cape
#

OKay

#

Scientific notation - are you familiar with this?

mellow thistle
#

im only familiar with scientific figures

flint cape
#

(i.e. writing numbers like 3.4 x 10^5 for 340 000)

flint cape
flint cape
#

Are you aware of what this is ^?

mellow thistle
#

^ is power of

flint cape
#

...

mellow thistle
#

what?

flint cape
mellow thistle
#

yeah

flint cape
#

...Are you sure you do?

mellow thistle
#

yes

flint cape
#

Okay

mellow thistle
#

oops

#

I thought you might repeat the question

flint cape
#

So far we've got that this distance is 149.6 x 10^6 kilometres, right?

mellow thistle
#

yes

flint cape
#

Right - is that number, 149.6 x 10^6, in scientific notation yet?

#

[operative word being "yet" here]

mellow thistle
#

yes

#

no

#

yes?

flint cape
#

Love the immediate backpedal

mellow thistle
#

no??

#

no.

flint cape
#

No, it isn't - but do you understand why?

mellow thistle
#

no

#

I just answered

flint cape
#

Okay

#

Yh that's why I didn't just wanna say "right, it isn't"

low edge
flint cape
# mellow thistle no

When we write a number in scientific notation, so like m times 10^[power],, we tend to further restrict m to be between 1 and 10

#

(including 1, not including 10)

flint cape
#

I'm stealing your thunder

mellow thistle
#

can we just get to the point

flint cape
#

So - the problem part is this 149.6

#

With me so far on that?

mellow thistle
#

149,600,00 is 149.6 x 10^6 km turn to meters it's 1.496 million which I do not know how

#

1,496,000

flint cape
flint cape
mellow thistle
low edge
#

our m is 149.6, which is bigger than 10

mellow thistle
#

we just figure out 149,600,00 is 149.6 x 10^6 km, I don't see the problem with it

flint cape
#

We're TRYING to get this into scientific notation

prisma pike
#

Nah but 149.6>10

flint cape
#

BUT 149.6 > 10 - this isn't DONE yet

mellow thistle
#

It is already in scientific notation like how low do you want the number to go?

flint cape
#

ffs....

prisma pike
#

Can I just show the process

prisma pike
#

And we can deal with the consequences later

flint cape
mellow thistle
flint cape
#

Right - so you get that the thing we're multiplying by 10 to whatever power, has to be less than 10?

prisma pike
#

149.6x10^6=(149.6x10^-2)x10^2x10^6
=1.496x10^8

mellow thistle
#

ykw im using a calculator ffs we are not going anywhere

prisma pike
rapid mauve
prisma pike
#

The answer gives it in metres for some reason

rapid mauve
flint cape
prisma pike
#

So in metres this would be
1.496x10^8x10^3=1.496x10^11

low edge
prisma pike
prisma pike
mellow thistle
#

I don't get it

prisma pike
mellow thistle
#

I don't know how to explain what part am I confused

prisma pike
#

Didn't you want to get to the point man

#

I thought you were ready to deal with the consequences

mellow thistle
#

ykw nvm

prisma pike
#

Just tell which part the explanation starts to like

#

Not make sense

#

Where do you stop following

low edge
mellow thistle
#

just nvm

flint cape
#

FOK

mellow thistle
#

thanks everyone

low edge
flint cape
#

$$
\begin{aligned*}
149.6 \text{ million km } & = 149.6 \times 10^{6} \text{ km}//
&= 1.496 \times 10^{2} \times 10^{6} \text{ km}//
&= 1.496 \times 10^{2+6} \text{ km}//
&= 1.496 \times 10^{8} \text{ km}//
&= 1.496 \times 10^{8} \times \10^{3} \text{ m}//
&= 1.496 \times 10^{8+3} \text{ m}//
&= 1.496 \times 10^{11} \text{ m}
\end{aligned*}
$$

wraith daggerBOT
#

Waes (Wires)
Compile Error! Click the errors reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)

rapid mauve
flint cape
#

okay tf

prisma pike
#

Chill with the LaTex please

mellow thistle
flint cape
#

$$
\begin{aligned*}
149.6 \text{ million km } & = 149.6 \times 10^{6} \text{ km} \
&= 1.496 \times 10^{2} \times 10^{6} \text{ km} \
&= 1.496 \times 10^{2+6} \text{ km} \
&= 1.496 \times 10^{8} \text{ km} \
&= 1.496 \times 10^{8} \times \10^{3} \text{ m}\
&= 1.496 \times 10^{8+3} \text{ m} \
&= 1.496 \times 10^{11} \text{ m}
\end{aligned*}
$$

wraith daggerBOT
#

Waes (Wires)

$$
\begin{aligned*}
149.6 \text{ million km } & = 149.6 \times 10^{6} \text{ km} \\
&= 1.496 \times 10^{2} \times 10^{6} \text{ km} \\
&= 1.496 \times 10^{2+6} \text{ km} \\
&= 1.496 \times 10^{8} \text{ km} \\
&= 1.496 \times 10^{8} \times \10^{3} \text{ m}\ \
&= 1.496 \times 10^{8+3} \text{ m} \\
&= 1.496 \times 10^{11} \text{ m}
\end{aligned*}
$$
```Compilation error:```! LaTeX Error: Environment aligned* undefined.

See the LaTeX manual or LaTeX Companion for explanation.
Type  H <return>  for immediate help.
 ...                                              
                                                  
l.50 \begin{aligned*}
                     
Your command was ignored.
Type  I <command> <return>  to replace it with another command,
or  <return>  to continue without it.```
mellow thistle
#

I think I'll just fail this grade

#

I have no point I don't understand it

coral jewel
#

no

flint cape
#

oh

prisma pike
wraith daggerBOT
#

Waes (Wires)
Compile Error! Click the errors reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)

tropic oxide
#

and i believe it's align*

flint cape
#

There we go

mellow thistle
flint cape
prisma pike
#

This is actually a Monty python sketch

low edge
low edge
prisma pike
mellow thistle
#

I'm literally crying

rapid mauve
#

i'm inclined to try to break it down

mellow thistle
#

I don't understand a single thing and atp im guessing the answer and might even cheat in the exams

rapid mauve
#

but uh

flint cape
#

@mellow thistle Can you understand this? If not, point to the line that isn't clear

mellow thistle
#

I said thank you

low edge
# mellow thistle I'm literally crying

heyheyhey, take a walk outside, watch the clouds make all these squiggly shapes and stuff, observe other people living about their lives, and try to live yours too, without being totally hung up by some stupid physics

mellow thistle
#

I'll just write a small index card and cheat my way out

#

ykw whatever I feel like I can still do this

low edge
honest field
low edge
#

do you have a specific question?

mellow thistle
#

Let's just start from the start

#

So 149.6 million is 149,600,000 making is 149.6 x 10^6

flint cape
#

yes

mellow thistle
#

km to m is 1.496 m is 1,496,000

rapid mauve
#

if i were you, i probably wouldn't convert km to m until the original number is in scientific notation first

mellow thistle
#

I do not know what to do next

low edge
#

There are two steps

rapid mauve
low edge
#

one is converting your number to scientific notation

#

the other is to convert your units into meters

rapid mauve
#

the highlighted part is currently "illegal" in terms of scientific notation

mellow thistle
#

I do not understand

low edge
mellow thistle
#

everything you said and everything Seia said

low edge
rapid mauve
#

do you agree that this is the general form of a number in scientific notation

mellow thistle
#

yes

rapid mauve
#

focus now on m

#

there is a restriction on the values allowed for m

#

why this restriction, you might ask

#

because let's take an example

#

there is nothing mathematically wrong with this, except that this is NOT in scientific notation yet

#

because we have a "spare" power of 10 here

#

we could rewrite the red number as a number in between 1 and 10 by dividing it by 10

#

but the number must remain the same size

#

so if the m has "sacrificed" a power of 10

#

the actual power of 10s part must increase by 1 power to compensate

#

so the bottom number and the top number are the same size and are the same number

#

but only the bottom number is in scientific notation

mellow thistle
rapid mauve
#

similarly

rapid mauve
#

now this number is in proper scientific notation

#

but this number is in kilometres

#

we need this number to be in metres

#

how many metres are in a kilometre?

mellow thistle
rapid mauve
#

and here it is in colored form

#

entirely correct

#

and that's it

mellow thistle
#

YES

rapid mauve
#

so

#

no fancy exclusions of terms under square roots from now on?

#

but well done

mellow thistle
#

How did he convert days to seconds

rapid mauve
mellow thistle
#

hrs = 24 ; mins = 60 ; seconds = 60

rapid mauve
#

so just do 365 x 24 x 60 x 60

mellow thistle
#

why

rapid mauve
#

60 seconds in a minute, 60 minutes in an hour, 24 hours in a day for 365 days

mellow thistle
#

I don't get it

rapid mauve
#

start small then. how many seconds are in an hour?

mellow thistle
#

3600?

rapid mauve
#

how did you get this?

mellow thistle
#

60 x 60

rapid mauve
#

and why is this valid?

#

what's the logic?

#

it's correct, btw

mellow thistle
#

because 60 seconds is a min and 60 mins is in an hour so if I have to go back from hrs to seconds I have to times the seconds and mins

#

I hope it makes sense

rapid mauve
#

it makes perfect sense.

#

now let's go up a tier

#

how many seconds are in one day?

mellow thistle
#

86400

rapid mauve
#

logic?

mellow thistle
#

same but with hours

rapid mauve
#

good

mellow thistle
#

so 60 x 60 x 24

rapid mauve
#

so now you have the number of seconds in one day

#

what do you need to do to this number to get the number of seconds in 365 days?

mellow thistle
#

3153600