#help-13
1 messages · Page 390 of 1
The number bigger the bloody avogrado’s constant
.close
Closed by @fallen needle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is the derivative operator linear?
by the way for short and quick questions like this asking google is probably faster and more efficient than asking here
@mortal yarrow Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is the power set of aleph null bigger then aleph null
yes, it's the real numbers
Closed by @fallen needle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can i have help
You're on your own for this one
guys i need help
From chatgpt
solve the collatz conjuncture
theoretically its 1
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
nooo, don't use gpt
pretty sure this is notational nonsense
like why are you integrating alpha from 0 to infty but then you're summing from 0 to alpha-1
that makes no sense
Im in 10th grade highly doubt I can do allat
chatgpt (sent above) is right that since the numerator and denominator only differ in this circled part, you can probably phrase it as the expected value of the circled part over some probability distribution parameterized by alpha and beta
also the circled part is a partial taylor series so it should approach 1 as alpha goes to infinity
but i still think the expression as whole is nothing more than notational nonsense as written
@chilly wyvern Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hey so i was doing $-1/4+5/4-2+21$
Tan
i wanted to simplify
so i multiplied everything by 4
to get -1+5-8+84
=80
but apparantly
its wrong
you can't just multiply everything by 4
that's changing the expression
and thus the final answer
its supposed to be 20
well it says f(x)=2x^3+5x^2+4x+21
find the remainder when
2x+1
I'm confused as to what your original problem is
like -5/80 + 2/79
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
you can always take a common denominator where suitable anyways
but this doesn't seem to be your concern?
The expression 2x^3+ax^2+bx+21 has a factor of x+3 and leaves a remainder of 65 when divided by x-2.
a) Find the values of a and b
b)Find the value of the remainder when the expression is divided by 2x+1
for a) i used remainder theorem to get two equations which i simultaneously solved to get
a=5
and
b=4
then for b)
i put it
like
2x^3+5x^2+4x+21
f(-1/2)=2(-1/2)^3+5(-1/2)^2+4(-1/2)+21
to get the remainder
this got me to
-1/4 +5/4-2+21
which i wanted to simplify
thus this is what i got
okay, this looks good to me
what's wrong with just evaluating this expression as is?
i hate fractions
and i tend to mess up
so its easier for me to convert it into integers
and then solve it
but as you said
you can't do that all the time, unfortunately
i cant do it since it is not an equation
there's no such thing as "converting a fraction to an integer" - that's just changing the number involved
the best you can do is force all the terms to have a common denominator so that the numerator and denominators are integers you can add separately
sure, you can do that
wait that would change it ;/
im so sorry for interrupting but after this may someone help me with my math rpoblem? thanks !
it won't
you can open your own help channel c:
4f(-1/2) = 80
f(-1/8)=80
so divide both sides by 4 to get f(-1/2)
but we want -1/2
you are getting f(-1/2)
the input of f is -1/2!
you're just multiplying the entire result by 4
-1/2 factorial?
which you can later divide to get rid of
just wanna put this here
no, just an exclaimation mark :p
no, 4f(-1/2) = 80
4x80
not f(-1/2)
ohhhhhhh
Closed by @meager dock
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
sorry
just got another question
The function f(x)=ax^3+4x^2+bx-2, where a and b are constants, is such that 2x-1 is a factor. Given that the remainder when f(x) is divided by x-2 is twice the remainder when f(x) is divided by x+1.find the value of a and b.
Seia please help me
and higher!
you can do the same thing as the other problem
is it just those 2 ppl you want help from and nobody else 
i know the phrasing of the problem seems more intimidating, since it says "this value is twice this other" instead of giving you the exact values
but try using the same method
but i can understand what Seia says because she uses simple terms
and otheer ppl use complex
which i dont get
seia literally said nothing
so f(2)=r
and f(-1)=2r?
yeah
what
ok so
r is kind of annoying here
because it's this extra variable to worry about
that's not really related to the problem
so what you can do here is combine these
in a way that allows you to forget about r
do you see how?
im still finding out f(-1) and f(2) and f(-1/2)
yeah, that's is your way of writing the remainders in terms of the polynomial
but specifically for these 2 equations you got here
can you see how to directly relate f(-1) and f(2), without involving this extra variable r?
no
hint: substitute
i got all the equations
f(-1/2)=-a-4b=8
f(2)=8a+2b+14=2R
f(-1)=-a-b+2=R
simultaneous equation?
always has been
8a+2b+24=2R
-2a-2b+4=2R
6a+28=3R
thought we were out to eliminate r
i think it would have been easier to write f(2) = 2*f(-1) to begin with
how do i eliminate R now
let's go back to here first
as seia suggested, do you see a nice way to use substitution to combine the 2nd and 3rd equations?
f(-1)=-a-b+2
2(f-1)=8a+2b+14
?
put f(2) into f(-1)?
let me rewrite what you have here without the f's:
-a-4b=8
8a+2b+14=2R
-a-b+2=R
does this make sense?
yes
what does reopen do?
reopens a closed help channel, but please don't barge into an occupied help channel to ask this
sorry
do you want to try this path instead? i feel like you're getting confused with the Rs
f(-1)=2(f(-1)?
no
oh f(-1)=2f(2)
oh i think i swapped the f(2) and f(-1)
reverse the f(-1) and f(2), my bad
i just reread your question
f(2)=2f(-1)
8a+2b+14=-a-b+2?
7a+3b=-12
-a-4b=8??
nuked the image to prevent misunderstanding
is this correct
where did that come from
to get the first equation
and the second one is
f(-1/2)
.close
Closed by @meager dock
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help i hate this chapter
could you provide an translation
its there
vro 🥀
just statistics
for a you can think it as
first you can choose 8 person
then you can choose 7 person
you will get 8 * 7 * 6 * 5 * 4 * 3
do you understand why we only stop until 3 ?
um why?
since we can only have 6 person
simplex example
You have 2 friends you want to pick 1 to be your teamates how many way can you pick
2?
nice
thats right
imagine if you have 3 friend and you want to pick 1 to be your teammate ?
yes
oh so the answer is 6
Is that 3 factorial
i though 3 ! as form of interjection
no it is not 3!
just 3
Its just 3 choices
If you want, give the friends names
Alice, Bob, Carl
3 possibilities: You+Alice, You+Bob, You+Carl
if you want to choose 2 from alice bob carl
you can see this as
first you have 3 choice
lets assume you pick bob
then you are left with with alice and carl
you now have 2 choice
either alice or carl
so algebraicly the way to pick 2 person from 3 person is 3 * 2
do you understand this
yep
so in the second slot i can only choose one of them twos bcuz i already chose one
your intuition is very good here
ah i see
now lets apply to 8 person
in the first slot you have 8 choice
the second slot you have 7 choice (why)?
why for every slot we go it decrease by 1
not quite right
this is right
we need to rephrase it
because you already pick 1
you already choose someone in the first slot
since then we cant have that person again
so number of choices = 8, number of available slots = 6 ?
1st slot, 8 choices
2nd slot, 7 choices
…
6th slot, 3 choices
sooo
👍
yes
b just mean
pick at minimum 5 girl
for 6 person team
do you understand if i say
pick 5 girl and 1 boy
pick 6 girl
you know what
we could not add them
since the question is ask for minimum 5 girls
we can just pick 5 grils
and just pick 1 from the rest of the team which is 12 person (17-5)
so use the same logic for the last question
but for the sixth slot we have 12 choice
so the last person can be boys or girls right ?
so in a team could be 5 girls 1 boy or 6 girls
exactly
thatt's what i mean by add them
mhm
if you need hint
remember you can choose 5 girls first then add 1 boy
then choose 6 girls
add the result
and that is the answer
can i use 5 slots for 9 different girls and then add 1 slots for 8 different boys?
and add 6 slots for 9 girls
so 9!/4! + 8!/7! + 9!/3! ?
yes
the answer is 75608
yeah
no problem
@supple rose Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @supple rose
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
ive been stuck here for some time
can i have a hint on where to start
complete the square
@wary pond Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @wary pond
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
completely forgot aobut it!,
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Yo
Guys high school is starting
How do I get perfectly good grades
Cause I Wana move at 16
And I'm 14
And my mom won't let me go if I don't have good grades
this looks like a question for #study-discussion if it's worth discussing at all
!done
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close 
.close
@small parrot Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Find the values of p and of q such that $15x^3+26x^2-11x-6$ is a factor of 15x^4+px^3-37x^2+qx+6
Tan
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
oh sorry
none
ok here is a trick
i cant figure out what to do
you know that this quartic must be equal to the product of the cubic and a linear
or to put it in less vague terms
15x^4+px^3-37x^2+qx+6 = (15x^3+26x^2-11x-6) * (LINEAR)
do you understand why? y/n
don't try to do anything from here yet
only tell me whether you understand this one step
yes
right
here's the neat thing...
you can work out the linear factor just by looking at the leading & constant terms
i dont need to do trial and error?
no trial and error needed.
look at the leading terms
15x^4 will arise as the product of 15x^3 with the leading term in the linear
the coefficients of x?
no, the leading term. the term with the highest power of x
15x^3 into x is 15x^4
so the first constant of our linear is x?
oh the degree
that's not what the word "degree" means.
yes, so the linear factor is (x + ???)
1?
i said no trial and error.
cuz the coefficient is not changing
now we instead look at the constant terms
15 into 1 =15
6 will arise as the product of -6 with the linear factor's constant term
oh
though yes you can write 1x instead of x if you really want
i meant it as the second constant of the linear
-1
right
so we have just reconstructed the linear factor
as x-1
15x^4+px^3-37x^2+qx+6 = (15x^3+26x^2-11x-6) * (x-1)
now it is easy, yes?
to get quadratic
no!!!!
no!!! you're overthinking it!!!
15x^4+px^3-37x^2+qx+6 = (15x^3+26x^2-11x-6) × (x-1)
not division
multiplication
literally just work out the multiplication on the rhs
no need for any division at all
do you hear me @meager dock
yes
the final answer i got is
15x^4+11x^3-37x^2+5x+6
,w simplify (15x^3+26x^2-11x-6)(x-1)
yup looks good
im just doubtful about this
^
what's causing you doubt
for the first linear constant you look at the coefficients of x with the highest degree and for the second constant you look at the constants?
its worded terribly but i think you get my point?
well you're right the wording is terrible
if it was a x^5 then i would have to find a quadratic
i would get the first term by looking at the x^5 and x^4
but what about the second?
well ok here is how you can make it a bit more formal
instead of trying to remember and then misremember what comes from what, you just write down the unknown linear factor the honest way ie as ax+b
and then expand the honest way
only you can still note that you care only about the two extreme terms (highest power and lowest power)
yes i get that now
but what if it were not a quartic
and it was 15x^5
+middle terms=15x^4 + middle terms
how would you find the middle term of the quadratic
so now we care about the 15x^5+11x^4+middle terms+6=15x^4+11x^3+middle terms-6
well then the unknown quadratic is ax^2+bx+c so you need 3 conditions to get 3 coefficients back
so you may want to start caring about one of those middle terms
maybe the second-highest power or the second-lowest power
i will not generalize further
Closed by @meager dock
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Bonjour Ann
Help me with that LA question in the other channel lol
Reopen it
Nvm, claim a new channel
And LEAVE IT OPEN, it's fruitless closing it literal minutes afterwards
that's quite an entitled ask
Sorry
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@wanton tinsel you can post your question here
ok, so can you find the lengths AB,BC,CD,DA

??
find them then
kinda confusing
y
ok lemme
Have you done?
@dusty wren Has your question been resolved?
YESSSS!!! Can u show me ur work?
i have doubt on a other que
uhh my camera is not that good
Oh, go ahead 🙂
Just screenshot
(0,-3 ) (0,3) are vertices of equlateral triangle find the third point
is this another question?
yeah
There are two possible locations for the third point
+,- ?
Just imagine an equilateral triangle with one side (0,-3) (0,3)
yeah im
@wanton tinsel with this sketch, can you tell me how many possible points will be?
To satisify the requirement
equlateral triagle = 3 points
no, I mean how many possible positions can the third point be
2 wihc is +y and -y
idk if right cuz that might be the only posityon on the cartesian plane
what else have you found?
what is this 💀
alr, I'll give you some hints before fully reveal the solution
okay
when did it become right angle triangle 🥀🙏🏻
Nooo, A(0,3) and B(0,-3) are two of the points of the triangle
we simply draw a line that is perpenduliar to AB
okay
3 minutes and I'll give u the next hint
yes
Not quite
I can tell your intuition's right - that the two possible points are either side of this line
And that they're on an axis
yeah
Let's take it slow
i gotta go bathroom 🙁
can you point out the two possible points in this sketch?
just draw it
alr
imma hold for a while 💀
Will you be back later?
Which coordinate moves left and right?
idk... 🥀
Well shit.
gonna ask my friend
noooo
If you find it frustrating, I can guide you in vc
you're almost there
dm
@dusty wren Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @dusty wren
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
option 1 incorrect: leading zero
option 2: first row has leading zeros and no constants incorrect
option 3 : incorrect coeffiecents on third row
option 4: second and third row have incorrect coffecients
option 5 no constants
option 6 no constants
no options are correct
4

.close
Closed by @wicked bane
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
part a)
2t−36≥0⟹t≥18,−3t+63≥0⟹t≤21
G=18
H=21
part b)
C(t)=550(2t−36)+650(−3t+63)+1350t
t(18,21)
x1 = (2(18)-36) = 0
x2=-3(18)+63=9
x3=18
C(18) =550(2(18)−36)+650(−3(18)+63)+1350(18) = 30150
4
.reopen
✅
Closed by @wicked bane
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i wanna know
how is this even valid
how do we rewrite (ap + bq) ^x as (ap)^x + (bq)^x
what is N
N = p * q
are p, q primes?
have you tried expanding (ap+bq)^x
wdym
mb I forgot how to say it in english
i can expand it but what difference would it make
try it
do you know the sigma notation for sums
yea
we can expand it with the binomial theorem
but i still don't understand where ur going with this
and newton binomial formula?
the first term would be (ap)^e1e2, and the rest would be the sum from 1 to e1e2 (ap)^e1e2-k * (bp)^k
what about them
what is their value mod N
[0, N-1]
we got the left side and right side
left side is (ap)^e1e2-k
p ^ anything is going to be 0 mod N
because N divides p
not quite
mmmmmmm
p divides N, not the opposite
yeah that's what i meant
but then it's not 0 mod N: you have to look at the right side as well
thing is
thats true for p ^ anything mod N
but we got a constant being multiplied with p
so the value of the left side is going to be just the constant alone
and im guessing same thing with the right side
so a * b mod N
i think?
wait no
no, p^anything is not 0 mod N (for example p^1 = p is not 0)
(ap)^e1e2-k * (bp)^k
a^e1e2-k * p^e1e2-k * b^k * q^k
a^e1e2-k * b^k
oh yeah
well N is pq
so to be able to know the value i need to group the p and q together
exactly
the thing is: if e1e2-k >= 1 and k >= 1, you have pq in your product
thus N divides
yeah but do i not also have a and b
imagine if Y = q
how can we say aq^x % Y divides
if it was q^x % Y i'd get it
q divides aq^x
oh wai
t
uyeah
yeah yeah that makes perfect sense
so that sum entirely gives 0 under mod
and we're left with the first term of the expansion
(ap)^e1e2
wait so
im assuming
(bq)e1e2
is the last term of the expansion
correct?
this way we cut the all the lone terms from the expansion
so everything else left returns 0 mod N
yeah i think that's the case
yes
Closed by @dull plover
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
suppose to be 1.496x10^7
1496000?????
by the time you finish counting all the 0s climate change will destroy us all
variables?
one million is 10^6.
1,000,000 = x10^7
keep in mind also that you're converting from km to m, which picks up 3 more orders of magnitude,
and then finally 149.6 = 1.496 * 10^2
,w 1 million in scientific notation
oh
,w 149.6 million in scientific notation
,w 149.6 million km in scientific notation
149.6 million km, in meters, becomes:
1.496 * 10^2 * 10^6 * 10^3 m
,w 149.6 million km in scientific notation in meters
Wolfram Alpha doesn't understand your query!
Perhaps try rephrasing your question?
Click here to refine your query online
wth
I just thought of the rules of scientific figures like "Non-zero digits are always significant."
this is not about significant figures at all
so I thought you count 1 in 1,000,000 as x10^7
- 1.496 * 10^2 is 149.6
- 10^6 is million
- 10^3 is a kilometer in meters
therefore,
149.6 million km, in meters, becomes:
1.496 * 10^2 * 10^6 * 10^3 m
do you understand
,w 1496000000000 in scientific notation
you cannot talk about only the number
But you do not count the non zero digits
This is ridiculous
this is not about sigfigs and never was about sigfigs
1,000,000 is x10^6 making it a million
but when it's 1496000000 it's not a million
This is already confusing
How can I differenciate
And why are they not the same
Why is it not valid?
1 million = 1,000,000
2 million = 2,000,000
2.5 million = 2,500,000
25 million = 25,000,000
149,600,000?
that's the number 149.6 million written out longhand yes
149.6 x10^9
this is like the argument sketch by monty python
149,600,000=149.6x10^6
So significant figure do not count the non zero digits?
i think you're confused about the concept of significant figures and we're not able to relieve this confusion
What is one million long form
What is 10^1
1?
No
10
Yes
When you take a^x you are multiplying a by itself x times
So 10^1=10, 10^2=10x10, 10^3=10x10x10
And so on
So what is 10^2
100
10^3
1000
10^6
1000000
So 1 million= 10^6
I did it gang let's go
Sorry I mean you did it gang
Let's gooo🔥
I think I need to see a hospital because I feel like I'm not normal not understanding it at the beginning
I think you just forgot what an exponent is tbh
now all you have to do is say that 149.6 million is 149.6 times one million. ergo, 149.6×10^6
if you understood it now you're fine
I blame this guy how in the world he got 1.496 x 10^11
Because you're not done yet
@mellow thistle Do you agree so far with this, first off?
yes
im only familiar with scientific figures
(i.e. writing numbers like 3.4 x 10^5 for 340 000)
- that's "significant figures"
- not the same thing
Hence me giving this clarification
Are you aware of what this is ^?
^ is power of
...
what?
I mean - do you understand this message that I'm responding to?
yeah
...Are you sure you do?
yes
Okay
So far we've got that this distance is 149.6 x 10^6 kilometres, right?
yes
Right - is that number, 149.6 x 10^6, in scientific notation yet?
[operative word being "yet" here]
Love the immediate backpedal
No, it isn't - but do you understand why?
Are you familiar with S.I.? (system internationale)
When we write a number in scientific notation, so like m times 10^[power],, we tend to further restrict m to be between 1 and 10
(including 1, not including 10)
(exclusive of 10)
oh oops
I'm stealing your thunder
can we just get to the point
Point is here
So - the problem part is this 149.6
With me so far on that?
149,600,00 is 149.6 x 10^6 km turn to meters it's 1.496 million which I do not know how
1,496,000
This is why I didn't get to the point yet - because you're jumping off the cliff before I've given you the harness
kg?
Do you understand that this number, as it is, is a problem?
what's the problem with it?
Because of this
our m is 149.6, which is bigger than 10
we just figure out 149,600,00 is 149.6 x 10^6 km, I don't see the problem with it
We're TRYING to get this into scientific notation
Nah but 149.6>10
BUT 149.6 > 10 - this isn't DONE yet
It is already in scientific notation like how low do you want the number to go?
ffs....
Can I just show the process
Did you read this.
And we can deal with the consequences later
ykw sure
I did
Right - so you get that the thing we're multiplying by 10 to whatever power, has to be less than 10?
149.6x10^6=(149.6x10^-2)x10^2x10^6
=1.496x10^8
ykw im using a calculator ffs we are not going anywhere
But this is in km
The answer gives it in metres for some reason
SI unit for distance is metres
[because most physics calculations require it in metres]
So in metres this would be
1.496x10^8x10^3=1.496x10^11
scientific notation means converting your units to fit the international system. When we are talking about distance, and you have kilometers, you want to convert them to meters.
I guess that is the some reason isn't it
Because the k in km stands for kilo which is a prefix for 10^3
I don't get it
Please reference which part you don't get
I don't know how to explain what part am I confused
Didn't you want to get to the point man
I thought you were ready to deal with the consequences
ykw nvm
Just tell which part the explanation starts to like
Not make sense
Where do you stop following
Point is; 1. you dont want to have kilometers in your answer, you want meters.
2. you gotta convert the 149.6 to 1.496×10^2.
just nvm
FOK
thanks everyone
look, take a break, study some basics that cover this stuff, and you can come back with more insight
$$
\begin{aligned*}
149.6 \text{ million km } & = 149.6 \times 10^{6} \text{ km}//
&= 1.496 \times 10^{2} \times 10^{6} \text{ km}//
&= 1.496 \times 10^{2+6} \text{ km}//
&= 1.496 \times 10^{8} \text{ km}//
&= 1.496 \times 10^{8} \times \10^{3} \text{ m}//
&= 1.496 \times 10^{8+3} \text{ m}//
&= 1.496 \times 10^{11} \text{ m}
\end{aligned*}
$$
Waes (Wires)
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
okay tf
Chill with the LaTex please
I did research and still don't get it
$$
\begin{aligned*}
149.6 \text{ million km } & = 149.6 \times 10^{6} \text{ km} \
&= 1.496 \times 10^{2} \times 10^{6} \text{ km} \
&= 1.496 \times 10^{2+6} \text{ km} \
&= 1.496 \times 10^{8} \text{ km} \
&= 1.496 \times 10^{8} \times \10^{3} \text{ m}\
&= 1.496 \times 10^{8+3} \text{ m} \
&= 1.496 \times 10^{11} \text{ m}
\end{aligned*}
$$
Waes (Wires)
$$
\begin{aligned*}
149.6 \text{ million km } & = 149.6 \times 10^{6} \text{ km} \\
&= 1.496 \times 10^{2} \times 10^{6} \text{ km} \\
&= 1.496 \times 10^{2+6} \text{ km} \\
&= 1.496 \times 10^{8} \text{ km} \\
&= 1.496 \times 10^{8} \times \10^{3} \text{ m}\ \
&= 1.496 \times 10^{8+3} \text{ m} \\
&= 1.496 \times 10^{11} \text{ m}
\end{aligned*}
$$
```Compilation error:```! LaTeX Error: Environment aligned* undefined.
See the LaTeX manual or LaTeX Companion for explanation.
Type H <return> for immediate help.
...
l.50 \begin{aligned*}
Your command was ignored.
Type I <command> <return> to replace it with another command,
or <return> to continue without it.```
no
oh
Ask your teacher about it
Waes (Wires)
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
lose the $$ there
and i believe it's align*
There we go
My school is a self study. so we come back at exams only
ik I always screw that up
This is actually a Monty python sketch
Do not give up, please. Just take it easy, and be more chill when you dont understand something, you can always learn it
Zamn
I SAID THAT
I'm agreeing
idk what am I going to do
I'm literally crying
i'm inclined to try to break it down
I don't understand a single thing and atp im guessing the answer and might even cheat in the exams
but uh
@mellow thistle Can you understand this? If not, point to the line that isn't clear
I said thank you
heyheyhey, take a walk outside, watch the clouds make all these squiggly shapes and stuff, observe other people living about their lives, and try to live yours too, without being totally hung up by some stupid physics
I'll just write a small index card and cheat my way out
ykw whatever I feel like I can still do this
okayyyyy I like the attitude
meeting the principal any% speedrun
do you have a specific question?
Let's just start from the start
So 149.6 million is 149,600,000 making is 149.6 x 10^6
yes
km to m is 1.496 m is 1,496,000
if i were you, i probably wouldn't convert km to m until the original number is in scientific notation first
okay this is where I stop
I do not know what to do next
There are two steps
one is converting your number to scientific notation
the other is to convert your units into meters
the highlighted part is currently "illegal" in terms of scientific notation
I do not understand
which part?
everything you said and everything Seia said
alright, it's okay
do you agree that this is the general form of a number in scientific notation
yes
focus now on m
there is a restriction on the values allowed for m
why this restriction, you might ask
because let's take an example
there is nothing mathematically wrong with this, except that this is NOT in scientific notation yet
because we have a "spare" power of 10 here
we could rewrite the red number as a number in between 1 and 10 by dividing it by 10
but the number must remain the same size
so if the m has "sacrificed" a power of 10
the actual power of 10s part must increase by 1 power to compensate
so the bottom number and the top number are the same size and are the same number
but only the bottom number is in scientific notation
similarly
THERE we go
now this number is in proper scientific notation
but this number is in kilometres
we need this number to be in metres
how many metres are in a kilometre?
YES
How did he convert days to seconds
how many hours are in a day, then how many minutes are in an hour, and finally how many seconds are in a minute?
hrs = 24 ; mins = 60 ; seconds = 60
so just do 365 x 24 x 60 x 60
why
60 seconds in a minute, 60 minutes in an hour, 24 hours in a day for 365 days
I don't get it
start small then. how many seconds are in an hour?
3600?
how did you get this?
60 x 60
because 60 seconds is a min and 60 mins is in an hour so if I have to go back from hrs to seconds I have to times the seconds and mins
I hope it makes sense
86400
logic?
same but with hours
good
so 60 x 60 x 24
so now you have the number of seconds in one day
what do you need to do to this number to get the number of seconds in 365 days?
3153600



