#help-13
1 messages · Page 388 of 1
mk
Ok
!noans
The purpose of this server is to help you learn, not to hand out answers. Do not ask someone to give you the answer directly.
and rhs becomes 4(x^2-1)
correct,
yes
so you have 4x^2-4=3x^2 -x+2
Yes
x²+3x-2?
close
4x?
positive
but i thought
so the quadratic becomes x^2+x-2
a+b should always he positive
what
whats that
that's not necessarily true
oh but my teacher said that
How did it become 1/x?
No like X is equal to 1 right
if i didnt mess up, factor this and youre done
OK
wait your not you need to check for zeros in the denom
so basically reject 1 and -1
@true wasp if youre done js close this channel
OP's class has started, so I don't think he'll be able to access this channel anymore.
.close
Closed by @spring forum
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
books says Logarithms
Inverse trigonometry
Polynomial
Exponential
Trigonometric
someone and an online source told me Logarithm
Inverse
Algebraic (or polynomial)
Trig
Exponential
so trig or exponential first?!?!
the second is correct
What is this a list of?
integration by parts, functions to take the derivative of
what even is your question
alr so ig my book is just griefing then
guess so
.close
Closed by @sturdy escarp
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
trig is definitely first, just wanted to add my opinion
alr bet
is there one "correct" answer for the order to learn those
wait actually is this an ibp rule thingy
Yeah
disregard, i misunderstood
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
helloo,, i'm looking for help regarding the concept of "tricky symbols" in math, as i dont really understand how i can deduce what specific operation do these "tricky symbols" mean at times.
i provided my textbook's description of this concept below.
ps: i'm a humanities student so i am not the smartest when it comes to math!!
,rccw
most of the time its given
these 2 "weird symbol" seem to be defined with operations you should be more familiar with.
how about for the example no. 2? i don't really get if the A❤️B is either multiplication or addition?
it's both!
for example we can have this
it's a mix of the two
also theyre not necessarily algebraic (like multiplication, or addition) it can be stuff like
A*B = 1 if their sum is even, 0 if their sum is odd
if it's like that, then how does 8❤️(4❤️5) work? would it act similarly to :
(4❤️5) = 8(4×5) ÷ 8(5+5) ??
im sorry i may seem a bit thick in the head when it comes to numbers
no it’s more like
you have to put the result of 4❤️ 5 as the right side of 8 ❤️
so what does 8❤️ be?
8 ❤️ is incomplete to compute it you need something as it’s right side. it’s (4x5)/(4+5)
(4×5)/(4+5) would be 2.22222+ wouldn't it?
20/9 = 4 ❤️ 5
so now to complete the question you have to use the ❤️ définition on 8 ❤️ 2.222222…
hmm.. so we gotta replace A and B with 8 and 2.2222 ?
btw should we write it as 2.22 ? round it up?
in this case i would assume they want an exact answer
maybe doing fractions 20/9 =2.222… would be best
fractions r about to make this more complicated omg (at least for me)
you can approx by 2.22, but it won’t be exactly the right answer. imo try it out with fractions
to be fair computing this thing exactly is not most important thing it’s good fraction practice if you need it
i get 40/23 which is ish approximately 1.74 when computing it down
@gaunt quartz Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @gaunt quartz
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
okayyy tysm everyone hehe
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
,tex
$
\text{Given } a,b,c \geq 0, a^2+b^2+c^2=3 ; \text{Prove:} \
\frac{1}{3} \leq \left( \frac{a}{3 - bc} \right)^2 + \left( \frac{b}{3 - ca} \right)^2 + \left( \frac{c}{3 - ab} \right)^2 \leq \frac{3}{4}
$
Nerdyasianguy
I tried subsituting in 3 but don't know how to proceed
I know that the equality for the left side is when (a,b,c)~(0,0,√3)
And for the right side is when a=b=c=1
But idk how to deal with either
you mean right side
Oh yes, i'm never right
$bc \leq \frac{b^2+c^2}{2}$ by AM GM
Civil Service Pigeon
Further hint: ||use this to rewrite 3-ab, 3-bc, 3-ac||
@soft path Has your question been resolved?
So a²/(3-bc)² ≤ a²/(a²+3/2(b²+c²))²
.close
Closed by @soft path
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Help with 6th one
Is this a valid reason for the given set not being a vec space
! Help
To ask for mathematics help on this server, please open your own help channel or help thread. See #❓how-to-get-help for instructions.
it looks good to me
ig it's whatever vector properties you used in your proof
like associativity of addition
it's more literally just a proof by contradiction ig. you assume it's a vector space, then show a contradiction, so it's not
so one of the assumptions you started with must be false
Okay so just contradicting the assumptions
yeah
i guess whenever you get to thinking about matrices as "linear transformations", that's always a nice way to think about them imo
that's just one thing that comes to mind :p
i can't think of much else, i think it's an approachable topic
Np!
I thought that wasn't for questions
you can ask general questions to get people's opinions
but yeah it's not like a guaranteed way to get help on a specific quesiton
They seem to be talking about something else
it helps to phrase the question in a way that's interesting to them ig lol
in general discussion doesnt want to be asked genuine questions
theyll just troll
it's like a casual chat
you can bring up the topic and get opinions
like in a busy bar
Alright thanks guys
most people will be drunk af (in this analogy) but still worth trying
good luck!
will come again for further questions
Once I complete this exercise
. Close
. Close
(no space)
if youre stuck trying to type this on a phone, try using the backspace key to get it right
it just needs to be .close or .solved
. close
almost 😂
here try this
Is this thing stuck
hiro you are on a phone
when you type ., theres a good chance the phone is adding a space afterwards
Closed by @feral dagger
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
🎉
Thanks man
its autocorrect
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
The closed under addition condition
Does it mean that if u, w belong to U then u+w must belong to U or that if u+w belongs to U then u, w must belong to U
Or is it both
i would say the box 1.34 says it pretty explicitly, it's the first one
not necessarily the second
So the reverse doesn't matter
it's not necessary yeah
Closed by @feral dagger
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
.close
Already closed
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i have found that n <= 4 will have an interger solution
but i cant verify that if n>4 there will be any solution
||It seems like Vieta Jumping, but I haven't solved it||
it is infact vietta jump
I guess square both sides then write it as a quadratic
i cant substitute a = (a*)^2
b=(b*)^2
and so on
if a,b,c,d is a square its easy to show that if n>4 there will be no sol
there will be actually a sol where a=b=c=d=0
but we cant have zero
but a,b,c,d can be a non square integer
so i cant prove it
@spark mist Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @spark mist
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
.close
Closed by @spark mist
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i solve this? im kinda stuck
consider what it means that your quadratic has a linear factor at all @crimson sedge
uhhh
im not sure what it means
it means that the quadratic has a real root
and what can we say about it based on that?
there's a quantity you should know about that you can calculate for any quadratic to get some useful info out of it
it is commonly denoted with D or Δ
do you know what im talking about
yes the discriminant.
what can it tell us about the roots?
say it in general first.
ok, so knowing what this particular quadratic has at least one root, what must be true of its discriminant?
D>=0
yes
Closed by @storm fern
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
could someone help me with e, i have already done a,b,c,d
can we get a,b,c,d
show your sketch!
ok
so the graph will keep going down forever to the left of -1 or right of 2
now here is what i want you to do:
imagine a horizontal line (y=k) scanning this graph bottom to top. like sweeping across the plane.
at which height does it stop intersecting the curve?
not quite. the curve keeps going down past what you have sketched, remember?
but yes the line stops touching the curve for k>27/16
it relates more to b
d is just to give you a better idea of what's happening, but you have to imagine what happens outside of your sketch zone
f is a polynomial, so once it starts decreasing for good past its stationary points, it's gonna keep decreasing
up until -infinity
so the answer is k< or equal to 27/16
it does
<=
use <= if you cannot type the weak inequality sign
alright
typing out < or equal to looks bad
got it
what is f?
Function
what about polynomial
i remember that
polynomials are a special class of functions
very confusing to understtand tho
What is confusing abt it
he was talking about f(x) as in your problem
the subscript
you need names for each and every coefficient but the Latin alphabet does not have that many letters so you call them the same letter but with different subscripts.
a_0, a_1, a_2 are just three different variables that's it
normally subscripts also separate related variables
eg: a here represents the coefficients of each term
so all of the a are coefficients
the subscript tells you which term it's a coefficient of
@torn marsh Has your question been resolved?
this is true but there's a risk of overthink
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
ok that makes sense
is it a good idea to talk about the rational root theorem now
You need to find one root first and long divide
unfortunately: ||that doesn't have a good factorisation||
so for any cubic functions, to solve for for its x intercept
we need to use the root thereom?
synthetic division?
rational theorem helps you find nice rational roots if they exist
is it a hard concept to grip because if it is, i wont bother
- its not requried for in my course
I usually put in simple values like 0,1,2,3,-1,-2,-3... Etc. i dont even know the rational root theorem lmao never needed but can you explain wtf it actually is?
concept isnt that complex
ok ill listen
if a polynomial has rational roots, they must all be factors of p/q, where p is the leading coefficient and q is the constant term
rational root theorem tells you which easy values to guess. so that you dont have to guess completely randomly
Oh
Well idts this polynomial has rational roots then
One idea might be to use the depressed cubic formula that i learnt tp flex on my friends
Oh its not a depressed cubic
idt this one has a nice factorization either
You might need to transform it by writing x'=x-b/3a
what level is rational root thereoum
That is implied as the polynomial doesnt have a rational root
fair yeah
I never learnt it formally
You can learn it in any point of ur life tho
rrt is usually introduced around when you're introduced to cubic+ polynomials
there are better alternatives when factorising quadratics which is why it isn't used for that
or in the form of ax^n + bx....+c where n is greater than 0 but not equal to 3
for quadratics you can complete the square and use the quadratic formula
well i mean, if the equation is degree 1 (n = 1), it's a simple linear equation anyway
no need for any fancy factoring or theorem, just solve for x or y
i mean what about for example
if n = 2, it's a quadratic. see above
then you long divide
but tbh
if you can find a root by long dividing, most likely you can find it faster via the RRT
if all of the roots are complex, welp
but if n is odd, at least one root must be real, so
yes, but for polynomials
ah
because what i did was i sketched a cubic function
but it had the wrong x intercept
but im just wondering if i would get marked down for that
maybe yes, depending on examiner
nvm i remember my examiner saying we dont need to solve for x in cubic f
well at least you know how to now (a bit)
.close
Closed by @torn marsh
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
why do they give us x(0) = 3
whats it there for
What’s ‘it’?
dP/dt = sqrt(p)
it's the initial condition that the DE comes with
Not yet
oh
Missing one thing
wat?
umm i kind of forgot what proportional and stuff means
D:
:(
Two things are (directly) proportional if their ratio is constant
how do we make the ratio constant
Huh?
Use this
idk wat to do with that
erm find the constants first which should be easy and then just integrate 
and you have the initial condition x(0) which will give you the integration constant when used
we havent event contructed the de 🥀
):
proportionality constant too...
proportion constant
anyway thats my bah humbug comment of the mornng, carry on
@pseudo merlin aee you aware of what you need to do?
@pseudo merlin
oj wait
its a different quedtion
😠 1 question per channel man its confusing
as thr others have said
we're told that the rate of change proportional to sqrt of population at that time
so in words just $p'\propto\sqrt{p}$
hi gyutys
parabolicinsanity
k is the normal 🥀
dP/dt = Gsqrt(p)
i think ${\dot{p}}$ is more appropriate than ${p'}$
k
not particle physics gng 🥀
oh
thats dlc content
whats dlc
finish the main storyline first
what
ok brb
the
done!1!!!
or somethinf
c not 2 🥀
why
oh ok
but you see that theres a quadratic solution? thats all that matters for a differential equation
oh
so if i get a completely different asnwer
how will i know im right
wait lket me try anoither
just differentiate, honestly
oh
I will note, the sign in front of c, doesn't matter, it can be either plus or minus
oh ok
thats for directly proportional to the population not its sqrt
Constants multiplied to c, like 6c, can just be written as c, since it's still just a constant
I don’t get it
and like
Am I wrong
is this a different problem?
I think its a different question
No the same
Impossible
wat is it..
like i said, it just all depends on the constanrs
for this one
so no
okay thug
Closed by @pseudo merlin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
A 2 by 2 matrix $\begin{bmatrix} a&b\c&d \end{bmatrix}$ is said to be orthogonal if $a^2+b^2=c^2+d^2=1$ and $ab+cd=0$.Prove the set of all orthogonal 2 by 2 matrics forms a group
wai
is this your first time seeing the words 'orthogonal matrix'
no
ok do you know what an orthogonal matrix is otherwise
like the definition of that word
Yeah , det is 1
mmmm nope.
det is ±1 right
still not the defn
isn't that a valid defn
let the matrix be A. then AA^T =I
yes THAT'S the defn (modulo minor shit)
so if you want to show that all these matrices are invertible you can and should use that
Okay, I thought that would only come in handy later
nvm, see how it helps
so that makes proving it's orthogonal easy
from that it follows that |A|≠0 and thus every element is invertible
right
@mighty shuttle Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @mighty shuttle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello if im dividing exponents and the bottom exponent is negative would it just stay negative? for example: x^7/8*2x^-10 would it be 7-(-10)? or just 7-10?
$\frac{x^7}{8}\cdot 2x^{-10}$
purururuuriuruin
x to the power of 7 over 8 times 2x to the power of -10
purururuuriuruin
$\frac{1}{x^{-10}} = x^{10}$
purururuuriuruin
$\frac{x^7}{8 \cdot 2x^{-10}} = \frac{x^7}{8 \cdot 2} \cdot \frac{1}{x^{-10}}$
purururuuriuruin
It is 7-(-10)
no im asking if it would be that
cause you know how if dividing exponents you subtract them so in that case would it be 7-10 so that its -3? or like 7--10 so that it turns to a positive 17
Yes you subtract the bottom one from the top. The bottom number is -10, the top number is 7, -10 substracted from 7 is 7-(-10)=17
You can also see it is x^17 from the last 2 images
$\frac{x^7}{8 \cdot 2x^{-10}} = \frac{x^7}{8 \cdot 2} \cdot \frac{1}{x^{-10}} = \frac{x^7}{8 \cdot 2} \cdot x^{10} = \frac{x^7\cdot x^{10}}{8 \cdot 2} = \frac{x^{17}}{8 \cdot 2}$
purururuuriuruin
@faint plinth Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
where does the 20 come from? it appeared out of nowhere
think about why 180=4p+9f+4c
then try rearranging the formula into wanted form
Closed by @storm fern
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What is the first term of the product of ( 3x 2 − 2x ) ( 6x 3 − 2x 4 + 3x ) when it is written in standard form?
is it talking abt mutiplying the first terms or like the highest degree when u mutiply it
highest degree
ok thank u
thats the standard form, you write from highest to lowest degree in that order
.close
Closed by @silver tusk
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why is the mantle of a cone is πrs
@verbal turret Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
uhh help
this is basically parametric differentiation
@keen hound you here?
Let's try something simpler
$\pdv{ \phi(x+y,x-y)}{x}$
wai
yeah
cool
and i got
del phi/del x = Uc
del phi/ del y = Vc
del phi/del z = -(Ua + Vb)
where U = del phi/del u
and V = del phi/del v
@mighty shuttle
yeah, just a minute
uh, quick question, this is supposed to be an equation of two variables, right, unless I'm tripping ( otherwise all vars are independent)
right, it is
so f(x,y,z)
what is phi
a function
there have to be restrictions on phi
like?
like as written it seems as though the equation isn’t true
ah, right parametric
if phi(x,y)=0 for all (x,y) for example then the thing that’s written is false
im so demotivated rn i dont even want to attempt the next two problems 😭
Let $cx-az=t;cy-bz=u$
\
$\phi(t,u)$=0
\
Differentiating both sides
\
$\pdv{\phi(t,u)}{t} \cdot ( \pdv{t}{x} + \pdv{t}{y}+ \pdv{t}{z})=0$
\
ugh
epic LaTeX fail
This follows from the multi var chain rule
mhm
wai
ywa
who gave you this problem
yes
It's in my reference material
Higher engineering mathematics
see this message. engineers are bad at writing problems so every problem is a podasip (prove or disprove and salvage if possible)
I'll just leave it be and ask my prof
it would be a good exercise for you to try this
you can also ask your prof but they’ll be impressed if you come prepared
Try what
try finding conditions on phi that make the statement true
a good hint is to look at wai’s comment
Now we aso see that $c = \pdv{t}{x}$ for instance that will help you finish this
wai
where are you getting this
oh
yeah
i mean that’s fine
but you actually just don’t solve the problem from this
(because the statement as written is false)
I'll get back to you
In like ten minutes after trying some stuff
Yeah i cant figure anything out
engineer boy
while we're at it, can we do this
this is a disgustingly lengthy problem
HOW is one supposed to get the third derivative
@mighty shuttle @limber marsh
uh, I don't see anythhing but the regular method
yeah but it's soo long
I know
water beam
come vc
use r_x and r_y instead of writing everything out fully in terms of x and y
@keen hound Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @keen hound
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
.close
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help pls
we need to find range
What step are you on?
- I don't know where to begin

- I have begun but got stuck midway

- I got an answer but I'm told it's wrong

- I got an answer and would like my work checked

- I have a question about someone else's worked solution

- None of the above

2 , i know i have to use cos ( a+b) but it will be too messy i want a cleaner sol
You'll see that most stuff cancels out after using cos(a-b) and cos(a+b), not too messy
🤔
i thought there might be shorter ways to do it
try to think about how you can use this
oh wait
Btw, welcome to mathcord 
how about using cos A + cos b = 2cos (a+b/2) cos a-b/2
and cos a - cos b = -2sin (a+b/2) sin (a-b/2)
cool ppl here
sure
i like this though
log with base root 5 ( 3+ root 2 ( cos x - sin x )
got this
its for sure done now
because
cosx - sinx belong to [-root2 , root 2]
now multiply by root 2 that was outside
[-2,2]
now add the 3
[1,5]
log root 5 now remaining
hmm , is ans [0.2]????
hello. im new
Welcome to mathcord! 
Unfortunately, this channel is occupied by someone else- if you want to get help you can open your own channel (see #❓how-to-get-help ). For off topic discussion you can check out the discussion channels 
okay, thanks
@silk plover Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @silk plover
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
if x^2 + 25 was x^2 - 25 would it also be rewritten? something like (x+5)(x-5)?
Yesh
In general $a^2-b^2=(a+b)(a-b)$
denzio321
difference of two squares
Mhm
@faint plinth Has your question been resolved?
Nope, x² + ...² can't be factored
In the next years you'll probably see it actually can, but in a different math world (aka the complex numbers set)
So, for now, just know that it can't be factored over the real numbers
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
this might be really easy but how the frick do i solve this
Closed by @coral cobalt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
dont worry im not that dumb usually
hey Conquestor
i blame this on having studied only algebra and calc for the past few months
hi south
Hey
I think area of parallelogram is base into height
it's resolved already
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Trigonometry time
cosecA-CotA=..........
[proove it as tan(A/2)
might be easier to prove it the other way and then work backwards at the end
i understand that emoji
mine is to study
ur is to make me solve
just do it however
excuse me?
i mean make me do it
!noans
The purpose of this server is to help you learn, not to hand out answers. Do not ask someone to give you the answer directly.
what u have to do is make me do it
bruh I'm not your dom
whatever
then do ur duty sir
On tonight's episode of "How to tell someone to do your homework without telling someone to do your homework"...
i hope i wont be rude i didnt mean it like that
im practising and not doing homework bruh
Try and rewrite both sides of this, and see if they match up
if i dont want to i could skip
You see, the joke is, I don't care if it's not your homework - the premise is the same: you're all-but-asking someone to do this for you
hmmmmm u r not wrong also
Im pretty weak at Trigonometry😭
In response to the [?], rewrite the left hand side using the cosec and cot definitions and try to get this into some simplified experssion
Similarly do the same with the right hand side (look up half-angle-identities)
For the record, weakness is not an excuse for subordination
i mean thats the answer there are multiple option so ive to derive it so i dont think it would be any good to change RHS
i didnt mean to ask for subordination but was asking for a suggestion so i can do it myself
Well I mean I did explain how to approach this
So did gfauxpas, for that matter
ohk
so
(C-S^2)/(SC)
so i can get s(A/2) in denominator multiplying 2 in numerator
🥺
.close
Closed by @paper karma
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
LMAO
.reopen
✅
.close
Closed by @paper karma
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i do quadratics
solve
Any problem in particular?
This algebra video tutorial explains how to solve simple quadratic equations using the square root feature. This video contains plenty of examples and practice problems.
Quadratic Equations - Free Formula Sheet: https://bit.ly/3WZ8v1Z
How To Solve Simple Quadratic Equations:
https://www.youtube.c...
thanks
an entire playlist for you
ok
do u have a problem with the modulus or the quadratic
@flint bobcat Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @flint bobcat
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help im confused what to do ext
first just get the position of the tip of his shadow
x(t)
then take the derivative to get velocity
the distance function
like yk s(t)
yes
based on time t, what is the x position?
okok
x(t) means x as a function of t
you can treat the position of the man as some variable that you know, idk what to call it
x_man
or you can even use other variables if you prefer, like angle
yeah exactly
so like
we’re given the derivative..
Not x(t)
It’s not that hard to find x(t) right
But if it was more complicated
What’s the proper way of finding x(t)
so like we could use s(t) = 0 + 5.5t or something
what should I do now?
but here, all we need to do is write the position of the tip of the shadow (call it x ig) in terms of s
we don't need to know the form of s(t) itself
I still not rlly get
ig one way to view this is, just start with geometry first
What the point of similar triangle is
the bottom of the triangle is x
oh what
then s is the distance between the left two vertical lines
✅
we want x because that gives the position of the shadow
the other yellow gives the position of the shadow from the man (middle line), but the man is moving too
so we don't want that one bc it has a different rate of change
Is this right
so we just want to do geometry first, see how s and x are related
don't assume s is 45 tho
because s will be changing in time
we want the full relation between s and x, for any s, not just s = 45
Wait I wrote
that way we can relate change in s to change in x
Huhhhhhhhhhhhh
bc of what i just said
s will be changing
the question is asking about rates of change
Do we rlly need to tho
If I put s =45
Ill be solving for at that specific point right
Okay
but then you still have to find speed
speed is where rates of change come in
sure yes
mainly just an equation that relates x and s is important
if you isolate x that is helpful too
x
because then you can just take the derivative
dx/dt
and that will be the answer
they ask for a speed
in the question
so yeah that's what speed is
a derivative
i assume this is a calculus class right?
okok
i realized the answer is pretty simple so you may be able to visualize it instead
but if this is for calculus it's worth doing the math anyway
s is the position of the man (from the pole which we can say is 0)
x is the position of the shadow (from the pole again)
Can you show me that way too
Okay
i guess the 2 ways are similar, but there's a shortcut. i can explain it right after we do the math bc it'll be clear from it
ok so for now
$\frac{x}{15.5} = \frac{x - 45}{6.3}$
back to ginger
back to ginger
correct ^
you can just write "s" for short
but s is a variable, and variables can vary (in time)
ok so you got
6.3x = 15.5x - 15.5s
solve for x now
isolate it
and just solve
oh wait you did sorry
i'm blind
ok so the pole is 15.5 instead of 15 ft so i get 9.2 instead of 8.7 but yes
$x = \frac{15.5}{9.2} s$

