#help-13
1 messages · Page 381 of 1
it is
conversion to barycentric coordinates, though that's not necessarily the best way to think of it
barycentric coordinates are coordinates relative to a reference triangle of some kind
examples from wikipedia
of reference triangles
Closed by @cobalt plover
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I've arrived at a divergent integral
When doing differentiation under integral sign, can it happen if I've chosen an inappropriate I(α) even after perfect working
@gentle lintel Has your question been resolved?
@gentle lintel Has your question been resolved?
@gentle lintel Has your question been resolved?
U can use the integration by parts its easier
Aight lemme see
I found it
Well
What about changing ur alpha function to sum easier
that's my question
I'm wondering if certain I(α) functions lead to divegent answers regardless
or whether I've done something silly
Nooope what uve done is correct
Lemme use latex
Here are the 2 rules to use duis
Or u can use differential if u want
But i found the continuity is easier
Yes i checked
The differntial also is diverge
Therefore u need to check for another form
Can I ask why are you doing feynmans?
Isn't this solvable by IBP?
Yes it is solvable by IBP
@gentle lintel
Oh wait somebody already mentioned it
I see you have to solve using a separate method
@gentle lintel Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I want to show that f(T_1) = T_2 -> f is a homeomorphism, since f is bijective, it's obvious that it has a continuous inverse, but I stuck at proving f is continuous, how to show that for any V in T_2, f^{-1}(V) is in T_1?
@hallow scarab Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185> XME?
IMHO it's completely fine that there exists a V in T_2 such f^{-1}(V) is not in T_1
@hallow scarab Has your question been resolved?
What's your definition of a continuous map? Because what you said doesn't work
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
am I correct? I said A<X<C or C<X<E
for b)
yes that's fine
but my answer sheet said something else
did it say the graph was also decreasing at point C?
and i dont understand why
u could say tha
because that is true but i didn't expect it to be what your answer sheet said
It said "Between A and E"
when the y value decreases
um... what does that mean? like if i said the function was decreasing at C, what does that mean
its gettting lower?
actually let's look at B because it's 'obviously' decreasing there
what does this mean? aren't we just talking about the point B? the function just has one value at that point
yes it has one value at that point but as as it approaches c, it decreases
okay, you're getting warmer, i like the "approaches" term
appreciate it
usually what we say is that stuff on the left is higher than the point, and stuff on the right is lower than the point. does that make sense? does that seem like a reasonable definition for "decreases"?
again, as we zoom in close enough
Yep
because the line is just a bunch of
okay. so using that definition, what's going on with C?
what were you taught?
which is...?
this
did they just use words like "decreasing function" and expect you to intuitively know what that means?
tsk tsk
you are right that the function looks flat there
and that's important for derivative reasons (the derivative is 0 there)
but the function very much is decreasing at that point
which is why your answer sheet says it's decreasing on A < x < E
well no, because you said that it's decreasing on A < x < C union C < x < E
which misses the point C
having said that it's a very common error and i would expect others in your class to make the same error
understandable, that makes very sense now thank u
my other question is
could we say
y"(2)
cuz i found the seecond derivative
but im tryna take the second derivative of a particular input
yeah that's valid
well okay y''(2) is a little bit of abuse of notation
i'd probably say y'' at x = 2 if i was being precise
but it's fine
ill prob stick with y" at x = 2 just to avoid uneccesary lose of marks
since you have y = f(x) you can say f''(2) if you want
if they take off points for y''(2) they're a nerd
Closed by @torn marsh
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
[
\lim_{x \to 0} \left( \frac{\ln(1 + x^2)}{(\sin x)^2} \cdot \cos\left( \frac{1}{x} \right) \right)
]
Koren
the sin and ln stuff is 1 and cos(1/x) dne, what justifies all of the expression dne
limits arithmetic?
There isn’t really any limit rules for that
Unless you have some in your notes or textbook that are special
A good way of arguing if you think it’s dne is to find two different set of points which approach 0 but give different values at the limit
Or if it approaches -infty or infty; argue by unboundness
you mean use heine?
yeah i understand, we used that
With n going to infinity
Mhm
Mhm
You could multiply by x²/x² then you can use the limits sin(u)/u and ln(1+u)/u and cos(1/x) is bounded basically
so we should do 1/(2 \pi n)?
Don’t need to
this part i understood
oh cause i know (-1)^n diverges
You get something that behaves like (-1)^n and that’s not convergent
it's a known limit
Yes
I think that would be enough
Maybe give more arguments for why it’s like (-1)^n near infty
unit circle?
and periodicity of cos?
wait
by doing the x_n=1/(pi n)
i just prove cos(1/x) isn't convergent
i want to prove that
non convergent * convergent = non convergent
Yeah good that might be easier
but how do i do that :(
Or atleast for something that is like (-1)^n
Okay let’s just do it concretely
Our factor besides (-1)^n is ln(1+x^2)/sin^2(x) (I’ll keep x here for a moment)
i think i should do
x_n = 1/(2pi*n) and y_n = 1/(2 pi n + pi) and show this gives 1 and this gives -1 thus the limit doesnt exist
is this good?
Yes
I’m attempting to show those parts here
But for when n is even or odd
sin x is x near 0
same as ln(1+x) and x
And then u can just argue for when n is odd or when it’s even
Closed by @short hatch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
For a ti83 how do I know what to enter into a function without looking it up? For example if I want to use "binompdf(n,p,c)" or any other similar type of function, is there anyway to know what it wants me to enter without looking it up on the internet? I'm just trying to cover my basis for if I forget the order of things to enter during a test
you should be able to look up a user manual for the TI83
@hollow wind Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I was reading the letter "COPY OF A LETTER FROM SIR WILLIAM R. HAMILTON TO JOHN T. GRAVES, ESQ" in which Sir Hamilton was explaining his thought process and how he came to discover quaternions. I read the paper in hopes of acquiring a better intuition. I have seen 3Blue1Brown's video about visualizing quaternions using stereographic projection, while it did provide a great perspective, it didn't settle with me.
From the letter, I found out that Hamilton focused initially on creating 3 dimensional numbers, he called them triplets. His aim was to make them satisfy a product rule in which the magnitude of the product is equal to the product of the magnitudes of the factors. He couldn't do that with 3 dimensional numbers so he had to add another dimension in order for things to work out.
Only after he finished sorting the algebraic properties out, did he start to concern himself with the geometrical meaning. The equations in the image offer great insight. Basically, it is the trigonometric elements of a hypersphere. Where the sine element of the of the hypersphere radii or the modulus mu is a 3d vector. Or commonly written in modern vector notation: q=cos(theta/2)+sin(theta/2)u
But again, I am not very great when it comes to thinking of 4 spatial dimensions. So instead of thinking of it as the elements of a hypersphere radii, cant we just think of 3 concentric circles? If mu sin(rho) is a vector in 3d space, then cant mu and mu cos(rho) also be represented in 3D space in a circle on the plane that is parallel to mu sin(rho)?
@fervent sparrow Has your question been resolved?
@fervent sparrow Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hiii not an actual problem question
but how essential is trigonometry
pretty essential
Very
as in law of sines and cosines
VERY INPORTANT
very essential
double and half angles
yea
in calculus?
they come up every once and then in integrals
yes
and if I should master em completely
youll use a lot of trig
and a good amount of the formulae
yep Ap calc BC
I’ve played this game before
helps a lot
ik im js time managing so if I can get ahead with calc topics ill do that
cause yk summer more energy
ez
yea
U need some basic trig idens
i did that
but
learn trig and stuff first
before self studying calculus
trust me
ok ok
Double angle and inverse trig
i made the mistake of trying to learn calculus before even finishing trig and precalc
But overall, u need trig yes
Before precalc 💔
also that weird circle with random roots for radians its actually so down bad
dude i looked at the first few chapters and thought it was the same as alg 2

its actually making me stress out ngl
the unit circle?
Scammed
yes
Ap calc ain’t that much compared to uni calc imo
No need to stress out
They didn’t include epsilon-delta my g
No Cauchy mean value theorem
what the hell is that
No rigor

Oh dear
ive always thought of it as calc 1 is analogous to calc ab and calc 2 is analogous to calc bc
but the uni courses have a bit more
Ye
we only have calc AB and BC
I take calc Bc to get over with it and js take stats on my last year
There is a reason it's included in pre-calc
yea thats how every highschool does it
They are directly related to polynomials and rational expressions
Huh
i mean
I’ve only seen trig combined with polynomial in math competitions
i NEVER learnt nor drew nor looked at that circle
more than once
the more u practice the more u will get used to it tho
u will learn what each value corresponds to
real but this course is using it in the most random topics haha
wdym combined
like polar plane uses some
I should clarify, I meant the series definition of sin and cos of which the partial sums are polynomials
Ahh
long story short just educate yourself on trig and precalc before self studying calc
And that int 1/(1 + x^2) dx = arctan(x) (+ C)

what do u even study in pre calc completely
like on the first half I saw mostly algebra
i love trig
sequences and series
and a bit of trig
Like show that sum of some sun angles is this
matrices sometimes
U use vieta
but that doesnt show up in highschool calc
wait
Did I say something wrong?
1/(1+x^2)
Sorry, I meant to say +
This is why i dont give written exams 
- 🧀
Sorry i reacted too aggressively lol, meant to put one ? not three, mb
@violet drum if you do end up self studying calculus go check out khan academy and the organic chem tutors videos
they explain a lot of things well
even for precalc and trig
I was also thinking on buying 1 single book ngl
that has tons of problems
and some explanations
Like this: Show that
[ \cos\left(\frac{2\pi}{7}\right)\cos\left(\frac{4\pi}{7}\right)\cos\left(\frac{6\pi}{7}\right) = \frac{1}{8}]
k
free book online
Stewart or spivak are good
and doing the free resources
(not promoting piracy btw)
For all of calc
or that
if your goal is to just self study ap calculus for school
just get an ap exam review book from princeton or something
and youre set
lol
yes
real
same😭
just one book
didnt even use the online classroom
yea
my attention span aint that long
funny story actually my neighbor had a garage sale and gave away some calc bc review book when i was a freshman
so i took it for shits and giggles
and then decided to self study because i thought it would make me cool

it does make u look cool
Atleast u stuck with it
like those studygram tiktok people
yea thats like what got me into math in the first place
thats going to be me with physics

ap physics c?
cool
princeton review 🔥
I'd leave matrices to linear algebra, you'll probably have taken some form of that when you arrive at multivariable calculus
yea they are my lord and saviors
yea true
matrices dont show up until multivar calc
in terms of the calculus courses
we have a whole unit on those 💔
and they r fun ngl
for some reason I like em more than trig
I mean, it will help you in linear algebra
in the kernel of a rank-one map
If calculus doesn't take my soul Ill probably self study linear algebra on my own time
LIKE WHEN I FINISH CALC
💔
its bad for me cuz i tried to do it in 2 days and fried my brain
do what
multivar?
linear alg
I find it a bit weird to go through the entire calculus sequence and afterwards analysis, here we take analysis right away
analysis is calculus with proofs
oh shit yea
stopped at transformation of space cuz my brain
epsilon delta stuff
was gone at that point
i was planning on self studying multivariable calc and linear algebra by the end of hs
It goes every essentially everything you'd do it in calculus while being rigorous
and starting with analysis and other further math in uni
real
That's why I find it a bit weird to do first spend so much time on calculus (sorry I was referring to my own message, not replying to you)
Can’t remember shi from that learning experience 💔
oh i see what u mean
yall follow the math sorcerer
Nah
analysis looks way more complex than just calc though
or atleast for me
but the only gist of it ive had was epsilon delta proofs for limits
It's really the same, but rigorous, no handwaving
Series and sequences too, I think?
Building up everything logically
but being rigorous in general seems tricky to me because you needa think
nope
Which imo makes it feel like pain
like when you write proofs you need to reason for each step
cant just say something like "trust me bro" and let it slide

You can if both you and your audience know it obviously holds
A proof is really just like a conversation
Sequence and series isn’t in ra??
But you should justify the large steps lol
well yea you can cite theorems and stuff
but the main process is still you trying to justify something
rigorously
but it also looks really cool
and elegant
What I also find weird is the length of some of these intro to proof-writing books
I don't think it's very effective to read 400 pages on how to write proofs
😭
Instead, just start real analysis or (abstract) linear algebra and you will learn that along the way
dont they come with problem workthroughs and stuff
Sure but I mean, your analysis book probably has some worked out examples too
(Still it is probably a good idea to get familiar with proofs beforehand, for example by reading the 30-page document Loch gave)
where can i find that
#proofs-and-logic in the pins here
ah okay got it
but yea in general i feel like learning by just reading a book explain it then doing it yourself would be kinda tricky to visualize and stuff
All my analysis 1 books would include something like this at the beginning though anyways
like the book would probably explain it intuitively
but just getting a visual understanding of it would help a lot
or atleast thats how i feel
like for me if it werent for khan academys videos with visuals on whatever multivariable calc concepts they were teaching, i definitely would not have been able to understand those topics as well as i do
@violet drum Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @violet drum
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
<@&268886789983436800>
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello. I have a question about K-Means clustering.
I have 26 pieces of data that make up a single record. I then have 100,000+ records in this data format.
I attempt to K-means cluster the data. After using PCA(2), the graphed result does not form "clusters".
How do I fix this problem?
I can share an image of the graph i am getting if that is helpful.
Example of graphed results:
@gleaming path
!noping
Please do not ping individual helpers unprompted.
also, for this you might want to ask in #theoretical-cs , because people who are proficient in that area are more active there
(note that to access the channel, you'll need the undergraduate math role from id:customize )
Thank you for responding.
@quick pewter Has your question been resolved?
ola
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I got the right answer but I am not sure if I solved the problem in the correct way. Can someone please tell me if what I did is all good?
Looks good to me
Closed by @glacial moth
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm trying to simplify this into a term without a summation
I know that the infinite summation is equivalent to e^N, but I can't see how to apply that to this problem
Remainder theorem should give u a fair approximation?
the problem wants an exact expression
is simplifying this impossible and I've went wrong somewhere else?
Closed by @still thorn
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
for a map f: U -> V to be continuous, for any open subset T in V, the set f^{-1}(T) should also be open, it's the definition from the textbook Introduction to Topological Manifolds
@hallow scarab Has your question been resolved?
my suggestion is to identify a U such that f(U) = V 
then you can use the hypothesis that f(T_1) = T_2 to conclude
nothing to do with topology, just set theory
sorry but I didn't get it, for such a U what can I do?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
can you tell me what U satisfies f(U) = V? 
again, just set theoretically, don't think about topology
f is a bijection
yes, then this is automatically satisfied
that's not a good enough argument
f being a bijection serves a purpose here
it's going to allow us to find this U
it does not give us the result immediately
yes, for any V there exists one and only one such a U
sure, what U is it?
f^{-1}(V)?
there you go! 
f being a bijection means that f(f^-1*(V)) = V is true
now can you use the hypothesis that f(U) is in T_2 if and only if U is in T_1 to conclude that f is continuous?
I see! Thank you very much~😀
.close
Closed by @hallow scarab
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What do I do? Im stuck
a couple things to say
your derivative for the numerator is a bit off - you need to use the chain rule
as for your actual question, why not consider evaluating that function at t = 0? 
How do you use the chain rule for this problem? And do you mean plugging in 0 for evaluating? I got 0/0
to question 1, e^2t is a composite function with inner function 2t and outer function e^t; you’ve got to use the chain rule when calculating its derivative
to question 2, I meant plugging in 0 for the new quotient, after you’ve L’Hopital’d it 
So the chain rule would be(2t(e)-1)/sin (t) then take the derivative of it?
L'Hopital's rule says that $\lim_{t \to a} \frac{f(t)}{g(t)} = \lim_{t \to a} \frac{f'(t)}{g'(t)}$
higher!
my point is that you've calculated f'(t) incorrectly
because you didn't use the chain rule when differentiating e^2t
Closed by @cunning plover
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
hi, the latex equations are automatically compiled here?
@wraith dagger is in the server, so yes
you can test it out in #latex-testing 
gotcha
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I know I have A and B values wrong I just don't know where I went wrong and what to do
,rccw
x cannot be equal to 1/2
that is not in the domain of the original function
even if you sub 1/2 into the A(1-2x)^2 thing
you get 0A+0B=2
which does not make sense
what you might need to do is sub in x=0 and then x=1 to solve a system
I'm on a lil caffeine crash, explain it to me like I'm 5
Did I atleast get the a/thing + .... right
you got everything up to the second last line correct
A(1-2x)^2+B(1-2x)=2x+1 is correct
now you just gotta find A and B
Okok
I think the integral should be $\int \frac{A}{1-2x}dx = -\frac{A}{2}ln(1-2x)$
奇偶奇偶
jojo的谐音
ah yes, sry
So im subbing in x=1 and 0
yeah that works
it's $A(1-2x) + B(1-2x)^2 = 2x + 1$ right?
奇偶奇偶
😭
since you multiply by (1-2x)^2
you are left with A(1-2x)+B=2x+1
not B(1-2x)^2
just B
Now I'm more confused
you have A/(1-2x)+B/(1-2x)^2=(2x+1)/(1-2x)^2 right?
I do not
???
that is what you should get in partial fraction
I had A/(1-2x)^2 + B/(1-2x)= 2x+1
Please
you have (2x+1)/(1-2x)^2 right?
your goal is to make that into A/(1-2x)^2+B/(1-2x) right?
Kk
you make (2x+1)/(1-2x)^2 into A/(1-2x)+B/(1-2x)^2
therefore:
(2x+1)/(1-2x)^2=A/(1-2x)+B/(1-2x)^2
agree?
Gimme 5 secs to write it down on paper
k
Sure
I think so
and now you can sub to find out what A and B is
Let me try
k
So to find B, A must be multiplied by 0 right?
So can I sub x= 1/2?
yeah
But how do I find A if I can't sub x to make B = 0
that probably means you solved B wrong
XD
or like something else went wrong
what did you get as B
you should have B=2
I do
Yup
oof
np :>
.close
Closed by @vale depot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello, posted similar problems yesterday (im sorry) and i want to check if these are right
while im here, i want to ask if anyone has a solution manual to judson's abstract algebra theory and applications? (just to streamline the process a little)
feel free to ping btw
@calm berry Has your question been resolved?
@calm berry Has your question been resolved?
For your second inquiry, do note that except in perhaps very specific instances, like resources dedicated to self-study, or more computational subjects, college-level (and above) maths textbooks seldom have dedicated solution manuals.
If they do, they're often hard to find, and might not even contain solutions to each and every one of the exercises.
If you can find one, and it does help you in checking your answers, that's fine. You should however be wary of "giving up" too early and peaking at solutions too fast, which doesn't really help you learn. Do note that for more entry-level textbooks (like first courses in abstract algebra), most of the exercises will have already been solved online in one way or another (ahum mathSE).
I'll take a look at your proofs for this exercise over the next hour.
Appreciate the advice thanks
Azyrashacorki
As for problem specifics :
For the second part of a), in here you're missing a symbol on your third line (nitpick), but more importantly, as obvious as the step might be, you're taking a leap from line 3 to 4. It could be worth explaining why you get there with cases.
Also, you directly conclude but it would be nice to say that this x is in A1uA2, and thus that f(x) = y is in f(A1uA2) in order to close the loop for the backward inclusion.
b) looks fine except for the general issue I pointed out
thanks for the help
so something like this would be more appropriate?
Yeah that seems good
ok thanks
c) your last try is correct, only again the reordering stuff (just in the first inclusion, for the second you did it in the right order and the logic seems fine).
I didn't go through all of d) but the argument is similar to c), so you can just reorder and you should be good
can i show u an example of the reordering just to make sure i get it
Yes sure
e) looks good. You can also try to prove it without using the previous exercises for practice, but it's a good thing you used it so
what about this
oh wait im an idiot yes ofcourse
I mean it's clear what you were thinking but it wouldn't be right. The rest seems good to me!
thanks a bunch
thanks for the help
.close
Closed by @calm berry
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How i do these
what have u done so far
none. my teacher taught me while my classmates answered but i forgot
math js aint for me 😭
it aint for anyone🥀
anyhow
x-intercept -> f(x) = 0
y-intercept -> f(0)
horizontal asymptote -> the line that the function is approaching as x is very very large (positively or negatively)
vertical asymptote -> the line that the function is approaching as y is very very large (positively or negatively) - usually at the point where the denominator is 0 but the numerator is not
using this info, can u solve 1. 
This algebra 2 / precalculus video tutorial explains how to graph rational functions with asymptotes and holes. It shows you how to identify the vertical asymptotes by setting the denominator equal to zero and solving for x. It shows you how to find the equation of the horizontal asymptote by comparing the degree of the numerator with that of ...
what is problem?
u get it
if u dont like this vid
u can try searching 'rational functions'
thats the topic
Kk ty
try and draw the functions
if you can't approach a problem break it down
and if there's something fundamental that you still don't know then you have a more specific problem to solve
here you need to first make sure you understand what asymptotes and intercepts are
@abstract ruin Has your question been resolved?
there's three separate cases you need to learn from this
- degree of numerator = degree of denominator, so questions 1 and 4
vertical asymptote is when denominator = 0
horizontal asymptote occurs when you take the limit to infinity, so $\lim_{x \to \infty} \frac{4 - 2/x}{5 + 12/x} = \frac{4 - 2 \cdot 0}{5 + 12 \cdot 0}$
- degree of numerator < degree of denominator
coincidentally that matches up with question 2 (and 5), so the vertical asymptotes are when 3x^2 + 5x - 2 = 0
the horizontal asymptote will be just y = 0
- degree of numerator > degree of denominator, so question 3
you still have a vertical asymptote when denominator = 0, but you have no horizontal asymptote
instead, the asymptote is that of a straight line: for example $\lim_{x \to \infty} \frac{x^2 - 3}{x + 1} = \lim_{x \to \infty} \frac{x - 3/x}{1 + 1/x} = \frac{x}{1}$ is the slant asymptote
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
find the whole number parametars a,b,c such that (x-a)(x-6)+3=(x+b)(x+c) has infinite many real solutions
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
well i am sure you know that a polynomial equaiton of finite degree n has atmost n real solutions
yes
but ur told this has infinite solutions right?
yes,that is what the problem states
meaning it cant have a finite number of solutions
yes
and thus it cant be a polynomial equation
nice, now expand
not quite
what makes a polynomial equation a polynomial equation?
variables right?
how do i need to add something cause i cant see them canceling
well ur supposed to find a,b and c
so if u find the right a,b and c u can force the x on both sides to cancel out
not sure this is a good angle of attack?
can i set an equation or I need to guess
set an equation ofc
i mena the idea is obviously that the two sides should be identical as polynomials
im just not sure that i like the idea of casting the goal as "reaching a non-polynomial equation"
i can just set x=6 then
ok one solution is (6,-5,-3),(a,b,c)?
you had this equation, yes? $$x^2 + (-a-6)x + (6a + 3) = x^2 + (b+c)x + bc$$
Ann
yes i can see the original just fine
im just confirming that you did the work expanding the brackets on both sides
sure.
ok, and we want this equation to have infinitely many real solutions.
do you understand that this is only possible if both sides actually represent the same polynomial of x?
yes just like x=x
meaning that the coefficients have to match
so you have:
- -a - 6 = b + c
- 6a + 3 = bc
you need to find integers a, b and c that satisfy both of these equations
i feel as if @gritty galleon was trying to lead you to this but then led himself and you somewhere else
do you see where to go from here?
These are not whole numbers tho
i suppose adding/subtracting
what
the original problem says integers
Oh ok
I saw from here
@ancient iris celobrojni means $\bZ$, right? not $\bN$
Ann
yes
yeah ok
not quite. this isn't a linear system
it's going to be a bit more complicated to solve than that
but one thing you CAN do is substitution
quadratic quation i guess is
Yeah hopefully it factors
specifically i recommend isolating a from the first equation and substituting it into the second
what i can assume is that this problems are for my next year of math competition so ig it is quadratics and vietovs formulas
I think quadratic part is done
Still there are more integer solutions
yes there are, i found all of them myself just now
with all due respect this is not going to be relevant here
it's better that way
...
4 sets of solutions
a^2+6a+33=b2+bc+c2?
28 Deaths in Connecticut
i did something wrong prob,no way am i going to solve this
See in these integer problems you usually try to get a form like (a+k)(b+l) = m where k,l,m are constants so that we can see factors of m and make cases
So try to make a form like that with these equations
how did this happen...
squared the first one and and subratracted the second haha
....... no good, sorry
😅
ok maybe i do not know how to explain it without risking that you'll spend 4 hours doing useless things that both don't help you solve the question AND don't even learn anything
Do not do things without a reason.
but doing what i told you to do,
you get:
a = -b-c-6
from which
bc - 6a = 3
and thus
bc - 6(-b-c-6) = 3 ...
Ts guy
thanks
thanks guys
Solved?
@ancient iris Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is this correct?
a few mistakes
m^2 + 9m + 14 = 0 so the product of roots is 14/1 = 14
similarly go fix the product of the roots for equation 5
all quadratics have two roots when you consider imaginary numbers
I just use c/a
(the generalisation: all polynomials of degree n have n roots when you consider imaginary numbers, is called the fundamental theorem of algebra)
no this part is correcting the 'nature of the roots'
oh wait so imaginary being in the form k * i, where k is real I assume
Yes, but
Yes
yeah then that means that okay, the nature of the roots column is correct for q1, q2, q3, q4
q5 should be the roots are (purely) imaginary
a = sqrt(10)i, -sqrt(10)i
b^2 - 4ac < 0 does not imply 'roots are not real or imaginary'
your slide is wrong
weird phrasing, i think
Yeah
but the intention is right that there is no real root if D < 0
Yes
yes this is what they meant to say
no real roots
apart from that everything else is correct
'or imaginary' isnt necessary

Result:
25
okay q4 discriminant is good just panicked
hello
hi
@crimson sedge Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @gloomy wharf
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
,, \int \frac{1}{\cos(x)\sin(x)}\dd{x}
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
its alright
Maybe 1 = sin²(x)+cos²(x) helps
/cosx
hint: 2 sin x cos x = ??
You then get sin(x)/cos(x) and cos(x)/sin(x) which you can easily u-sub
Use this
Or idk still gotta multiply
By cosx/cosx or sinx/sinx
ig this one worked for me ?
i got 2 \int tan
You would have \int tan(x) + cot(x)
ah yeah
,w int cotanx
that works too
Should be ln|tanx|
You got the form f'/f whose antiderivative is ln|f|
You use this
i see
didnt work for me
i got 2 \int 1/sin(2x)
Then replace buttom with 1- cos^2 (2x)
re ti kaneis
Then sub u =-cos2x
from here i think you can chain rule directly?
uh how
Ti kano tou leo pos linetai
No
yeah actially this might work better
Multiply by sinx/sinx
,, 2 \int \frac{1}{\sin(2x)} \dd{x}
this reduces to partial fractions
After subbing the 2x
Sub
U=2x
Then multiply by sinu/sinu
Then make buttom 1-cos^2 (x)
Then sub z= -cosx
This is complicated asl
And its solved
Thats how you solve it
That's how you solve it
Or if you remember then Identity int 1/sinx = ln|tan(x/2)|
But thats how the identity is proven
Nobody remembers that
Thats the reason i explained how to solve it
But you should remember it
Anyone doing a lot of calculus learns it
that's how its solved
Or is given it on a paper of the test
or you can turn the 1/sin into a csc
Its the same thing
Its as saying to remember it
I just gave the proof of it aswell
i don't remember (anti-)derivatives of sec/csc for my life lololol
i mean if it helps him remember ig
Cause its good to know where formula comes from
very elegant
You can find it at the spot
But usually in tests its given
yeah exactly
Cause there is no point doing it
lucky 😭
Like if you do engineering they dont want you to do that every time
Its not the point
Im not speaking of experience
lmao
I just finished highschool im studying on my own im just saying from what ik of engineering courses
But yes its good to know how to figure it out if you care about math imo
fair
.close
Closed by @gusty copper
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Nyxzore
Closed by @round geode
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.


@cunning plover

