#help-13
1 messages · Page 380 of 1
i might be wrong but idk let me know
Hello If any help needed msg!
help here though?
Okay np
Wdym at equilibrum ? At t=0 ?
What is c ?
have a look at lyapunov equation
the sum of sigma_ii & sigma_jj
and why it's constant ?
one must exist
I don't have that in my course, I think there's just an error in the statement, I think I'll see that with my teacher at the start of the school year, thank you for your help (how do we close the channel?)
.close
.close
Closed by @viscid dust
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
shouldnt this be squared with a negative constant added to it?
oh nvm presumably i isnt the same as j
.reopen
✅
.close reset timer
Closed by @upper laurel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i want to ask why am I this bad at math? i had an exam yesterday like I mentioned and i froze and started shaking in the middle of the exam, i couldn't answer anything
I can answer small questions where i plug in values and just done
But i cannot solve anything that requires brainstorming
or whatever
Am I dumb?? i feel so stupid
hi
you probably need more practice in solving questions
are the exam questions published?
this skill requires tons of practice to understand concepts
it might be worthwhile to print out a copy of the exam and try to do it at home, no time limit
to see which questions you can solve without exam stress in the picture
yes exam environment is very different from when you are solving at home or at a library
i cannot understand maths
and i cannot remember anything
okay friend I'll try one day
i just cannot understand maths and how each steps happens after one another
neither know how to derive things
each math is different I'm going crazy
I just wanted to reach out and say that you are absolutely NOT dumb or stupid. What you’re describing (freezing up during a math exam, feeling physically shaken, and being unable to think clearly) sounds a lot like test anxiety, which is far more common than people realize. It’s not a reflection of your intelligence or potential, but rather how your body and mind are responding to a high-pressure situation.
There are so many different factors that can affect someone’s experience with math (or any subject, for that matter), such as how it’s taught, how your brain processes information, past experiences with failure or stress, or even just what kind of day you’re having. Everyone learns and thinks differently, and struggling with certain types of problems (especially ones that require brainstorming under stress) doesn’t mean you lack ability. It just means you might need different strategies, more support, or maybe just more time and practice in a lower-pressure setting (e.g., homework, study guides).
You mentioned being able to do plug-in type questions. That’s still math! It shows you can follow the procedure and understand the concepts. The fact that you want to understand the material and feel frustrated by your performance also says a lot about your motivation and self-awareness. That also matters.
That said, it might be really helpful to talk to someone with professional training, like a counselor, psychologist, or academic coach, who can help you explore what’s going on with the anxiety and problem-solving blocks. I am by no means a medical or mental health professional, and this isn’t a diagnosis or clinical advice, but seeking help is a strong and smart move, not a weakness.
You’re not alone in this, and things can get better with the right tools and support. You deserve that support. You’ve got more strength and potential than you probably realize! 🫶
There are really not that many techniques you need to be successful at a large amount of mathematics. It is really a matter of identifying the most useful techniques and understanding their limitations. It is helpful to look at old exams and look for which tricks are being used to solve those problems rather than memorizing the whole problem from start to finish.
Having adhd might worsen you being able to remember these formulae and performing well under pressure, but you might still be able to do it if you work hard enough
For example, a huge number of problems involve using a 1 or 2 tricks and now the problem is linear or quadratic and there are only so many zany tricks they can throw at you before the problems are not that solvable.
If you know exactly how to deal with linear or quadratic equations, you really just need to recognize that the crux of a problem may be a change of variables that turned something scary into a quadratic, or it involved multiplying by 1.
also, i hope your teachers aren't the kind to just tell you stuff like
"this is formula, remember it, kthxbye"
@tired mural Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I will answer first question
You remember what the definition of an even function right?
don't drop the brackets
So f is odd and g(-2)=g(2)=-2
you need to write f(2) and not f2
yuh
And since f is off itself it admits negative value such that f(-2)=-f(2)
off itself 
It is -2
F(-2) = -f(2)=-2
f(-x)=-f(x)
You still don’t understand what odd even function is.. so revise on that and second
To find this derivative do you know the formula of changing it to natural log?
If no then search up and try
If yes then try again
i do i read the question wrong
If try again failed then search up how to change the log into natural log
You need to practice this, if it’s more a different question I might hint you the answer but basic arithmetic is helpful for your overall school experience
Closed by @strong jacinth
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi! Does anybody have a link to Markov's proof of the fact that the nth lagrange number can be written in terms of the nth markov number
I've been searching for half an hour but I can't find the actual proof 
equal to itself?
hmm wikipedia says it might be in the book of cassels
and I would expect that you can probably find that book somewhere on the net
@pure thorn Has your question been resolved?
oh wait it's free to download online, just realized
ty!!
.close
Closed by @pure thorn
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Number six
Pls ping
,rccw
What did u try
you can see at some point all powers below a certain number will always have nonzero coefficients
like, say the number is 5 or smth, thenthere will be a term with ^5, ^4, ^3,...,^-9,^-10
Why is this info important?
Oh wait
Why all the way to -10?
well if you can get that certain number you can know all the terms below it, and you can manually count the things larger than the number
cause thats the minimum
*the number should be close to the maximum, aka ^30
Why not -5
why would the minimum be ^-5
(x^(-1))^5
For your example that expression raised to 5
<@&286206848099549185>
Also maximum would be ^15
^
what
yeah but its ^10??
I was talking about this example
say the number is 5, not the exponent
@desert atlas Has your question been resolved?
this "number"
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
thank you
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone solve this question and explain it to me
What part of the provided solution confuses you
We know that the ap ends with odd number
But when we apply the formula to get the sum of all odd number . We need to first subtract all the even terms
Can you explain how to subtract even terms and get a particular term to put in formula to get sum
If you consider all the even terms, they too will be in an AP with common difference 2d and first term as a+d. Same goes for the odd terms except their first term is just a.
There is one thing though
What
It's not given whether the first term is odd or even
Hmmm
But that doesn't really matter, since the equations will just switch around
That doesn't matter though
Don't they mean odd terms as in a_1, a_3, a_5?
Yeah
Got it
Thanks buddies
I got it
Since that would mean the d and a have to be of opposite parity
.close
Closed by @tribal siren
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
welcome to the server btw @tribal siren and @edgy spire

Thanks for your help
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm trying to find the maximum height (at x=3) for this probability distribution
is the curve shaped like a triangle?
The curve of the actual dataset?
the curve in the picture
Yeah I know that
treat it as an actual geometric triangle
you know its base is 5 and its area is 1
so what's the height gotta be
you know the area formula for a triangle, right? the most basic one
If its base was in the middle I'd know I just had to divide the area in half and solve for the height
overthinking!
yes
A = bh/2
hw/2
@cobalt grotto Has your question been resolved?
I HATE doing anything at work it's so infuriating
But I have no real choice because I work constantly
.close
Closed by @cobalt grotto
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
for 4c I am trying to prove for n+1 by divding the n+1 polygon into two simpler polygons. But the question I have is if I divide it with a diagnol wouldn't I be adding an edge?
you would in fact be adding an edge
two edges, really -- one for each side of the cut
so the two polygons into which your (n+1)-sided polygon is split will have a combined total of n+3 edges between them
I am not seeing how it wouldl be 2 edges?
say I have a trapezoid
oh
are you saying its the same edge but if you broke the shape up that same edge would now be on two shapes
show the thing is I know that both shapes have less than n+1 edges but is having n+3 edges allowed?
they'd have a total of n+3 edges.
one would have k edges and the other would have n+3-k edges
with k and n+3-k both ≥ 3 of course
and thus each is at most n
Im looking at something like this if we look at the two shapes separately and we have n= 3 and n= 4
yes
then it is not a diagonal
it does not connect a vertex to a vertex
it connects a vertex to something else that isn't
our n+1 is 4 here, not 5.
the red shape has 4 sides.
you made it a bit confusing for yourself by referring to the big shape's side count as n+1
sorry was thinking vertices
sides and vertices are equal in number
there's n+1 of each
only, in your notation, n+1 is 4
n is not 4
How do we get the n+3-k part?
ok look
you said your red polygon has n+1 edges
by making the cut along the black line you've added 2 edges to the total
do you agree or disagree
i dont want to come back to this for the 40th time
Agree
ok
so the total number of edges among the two smaller polygons is n+1+2, or n+3
do you agree or disagree
Agree
ok
i used k for the edge count of the first of your two pieces
since the total number of edges is n+3
the number of edges that remains for the other piece is n+3 - k
does this make sense to you yes or no
Yes
have i answered your question of "how do we get the n+3-k part?"
<@&268886789983436800> spam
.close
Closed by @white rover
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi id like to how i messed up, thought i was doing well until i saw my answer wasnt getting close to the form
markscheme is a bit vague too so im not sure whats happening here
oh
let me post the wuestion sorry
Your A and B are in the wrong order
Should be flipped
It does matter
i see
Put the A and B into the equality and find out
i thought the same thing but they did sub correctly, check where the (u+1) goes
Oof my fault
yh no worries
I thought the - was a + lol
yeah, you're on the right track, just need to do some more log property stuff to get the desired answer
ohhi js did it
You can take the 2u-2 inside the mod as 2(u-1)
holdon ill show
Same with the 2u+2
No
When you take 2 common
You take it from both the numerator and the denominator
So they chancel
Cancel*
🫂 us
we've all been there
i finished a complex contour integration by cancelling a term instead of a factor... it keeps me up at night
Substitute u back in
i did
O
remember, C is an arbitrary constant, so you can redefine it a bit
lnk?
and then it multiplies?
within the Ln yeah?
i see
lnA
ahhh i see
yep got it now
Yh
so true
im not so sure, you hit every single mark on your scheme
so i think you'll get it soon, if not already :)
Closed by @versed coral
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
wdym
you're sitting alevel maths right
yes
im leaenign ahead
nice bro
gonna self learn fm soon

just make sure ur good on ur 3rd/4th subject too
entrance exams asw
no point of being good at maths and then not doing well on restr
😰😰😰
yeah haha
Welcome to the server Hello! 
ur skl doesnt offer fm?
nah im fine for all
it does
i didnt take it bc
hi
originally i was going for medicine
but now ive decided not to
and its kinda too late to switch alevels
i would recommend doing the mat then
or if engineering
only chemical i think would be possible
yeah i wanna do chemical anyways
or possible architecture
i think im goikg w chemEng rn
sure
i feel more sure ab it
where u triyng to apply to
than medicine or anyt else
UoB is my top choice
is that bristol or brum
brum
ahh nice bro
wbu
ucl kcl
yh not tryna leave london icl haha
yeah hopefully
engineering ?
yh haha
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
just solved the integral with di method does anyone know what to do about the infinity part
Its the same way to do when its real numbers but you have to write it as a limit
Yes
$e^{-x} = \frac{1}{e^x}$
riemann
use growth comparison
riemann
idk what this is honestly
i might just ask chat gbt to explain
Exp is winning the limit race
So if you have x/e^x where x goes to infinity, you have that e^x is bigger than x
the bottom row is all you need once you identify the general type of function
alright
also chat gbt is talking abt some l'hopital rule which i havent been taught yet
yea don't use gpt then
do u guys learn that in ap
I learn that in math
in the uk we really dont look at limits for some reason outside of differentiation by first principles
cool
i mean in high school
in the US advanced placement classes
Anyway you don't need gpt, and you don't need l'hôpital just pure observation about the speed of divergence/convergence
So you are doing improper integrals before limits ? Or its self taught ?
@quaint valve Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
not self taught idk why the uk education system works like this
im just doing a course online for differential equations
and it requires knowledge of limits
So you want help with differential equation?
You can either do integrating factor or use Euler formula
no not at the moment
i just need to learn how to use limits to answer these questions
What do you think the second
i havent answered the first yet
I mean we don’t have to think of lhopital
For first question
yeah
So first we see this convergence you agree
Becasue e^{-x} converges
And we adapt the integration by parts
How to do it?
So you don’t know how to do the integral?
I will show you
Basically we take u and v
no the intergral is fine
So which part isn’t?
i know i cant just put infinity in
but that was just me trying to imagine it
i guess
I quite wanted to do a more abstract way but here I I’ll do lohoputal
I think you should learn limits (including l'hospital) first.
Basically after differentiating x and e^{-x}
go in order
wdym
E^{-x} dominates x
Strictly speaking you don’t need lhopital
self learn what limits are if the course doesn't teach you. it is perhaps the most crucial part of calculus
yes, you can use taylor expansions
Actually no
I mean I can simply argue e^x dominates x
i honestly dont know what that means
could i have a study source
this is not sufficiently rigorous but anyways, self learn limits. i can send u sources
yeah that would be good
start here:
https://youtu.be/YNstP0ESndU?si=BzB5U0sdgYF2Bh--
This calculus 1 video tutorial provides an introduction to limits. It explains how to evaluate limits by direct substitution, by factoring, and graphically.
Calculus Video Lessons: https://www.video-tutor.net/
Join My Newsletter:
https://bit.ly/4jUXp6M
Direct Link to the Full Video on Patreon...
Still why would you do those very hard questions
wdym
Khan is actually better only for calculus
I was studying there as high schooler
khan academy works as well
Only for calculus though
its for a taster for differential equations which im currently learning for my personal statement (college essay in the uk) for chemical engineering
Can we stop thinking about differential equations first?
You need relax your mind
ive already started learning them at school
Okay
actually if i can ask one more thing
Basically calculus is the study of limit
Differentiation is process of taking limit
You at least need basic for differential equations
ik how to differentiate
its the only time where we use limits in uk high school
even then we arent really taught them
Yes tell me how differentiate f(x)
its just differentiation from first princible
F(x) is arbitrary
Yes
You can’t just write down the expression also
You need to show it’s actually that
do u want me to write the formula?
Condition f is differentiable… I just want you to study step by step
So you can actually reach your goal realistically
tbh odes are not too far from calculus, basic odes are often covered in a first computational course on calculus.
high school does a thing where they dont emphasize the importance of limits
i can see that atm
Calculus is the study of limit
the course says im missing two topics
which ones?
that i havent learnt in school
What’s the difference between analysis and algebra? Analsysis is developed by the study of limits developed by newton
eigenvalues and the complex exponential function
Any study involving limit is a branch of analysis aka calculus
everything else mentioned we have covered
Then study
okay so this is actually a full course on ODEs
yeah
you need to finish computational linear algebra and single variable calculus
can anyone suggest a source
To be honest, without limit you literally tell me that you want to study calculus but not wanting to study calculus
you dont understand that i want to learn limits
Any reasonable source includes limits unfortunately
im not trying to avoid them
I don’t know actually
MIT opencourseware, gilbert strang (linear algebra), and stewart calculus (or paul's online math notes) all work
look into them
Yes then khan academy
It’s not even hard limit compared to ode
You don’t even know how hard it can get
ok that sounds more advanced, i agree with dj linear algebra again at a computational level could be useful. It gives a lot of insight into what’s going on later on imo.
im in a weird situation where the course im doing at my school has a weird range of advanced topics but struggles to teach properly more simple ones
and it leaves me unsure of what i can and cannot learn
this could work also for calculus it depends how you want to learn books, online courses, etc.
that is on them and not you, but yeah unfortunately ODEs require a good grasp of linear algebra and calculus, which is quite a bit of work
if this is a requirement, are there any other options?
im just not sure what linear algebra im missing
or what calculus im missing because at the moment it seems like mainly these topics
we sort of just stopped after techniques of integration
but i have much more learnt outside of these topics
you'd need eigenvalues => determinants & transformations => matrices => vectors, which any introductory linear algebra course will cover
(uni-level introductory, anyways)
ive done all of those except eigenvalues
which was one of the two topics i said i needed to learn
il find a relevant resource to learn them from
im just going into my last year of high school to be fair
is there a link between eigenvalues and lines of invarient points and invarient lines
i will recommend one of Linear Algebra Done Right or Linear Algebra Done Wrong. You can supplement these books with 3blue1brown's linear algebra series, it has some pretty pictures
thank you
eigenvectors are "sort-of-invariant" vectors under a transformation, so that's a good intuitive explanation :) you will need more though
as for your calculus, this is a bit of a weird order, but chapter 5 seems to have what you need
the other topic was the complex exponential function
yeah and my calculus so 3 topics
eigenvalues in linear algebra touch up on chapter 5 for my calculus and then the complex exponential function which im confused about
my friend doing the same course said something abt the last one being a transformation in complex space but idk
im gonna guess they would want you to understand euler's formula, at the least, and the idea that a complex exponential describes a rotation in C. i'd lowkey read the wikipedia page on Euler's Formula, im not sure what to recommend for the rotation part
k
it just crops up everywhere to the point that idk how i learned it ;-;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OAahmA7lr8Q i like 1-4 from this guy
Mathematica File: https://bit.ly/3sbxNuv
⭐Support the channel⭐
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/michaelpennmath
Merch: https://teespring.com/stores/michael-penn-math
My amazon shop: https://www.amazon.com/shop/michaelpenn
⭐my other channels⭐
Main Channel: https://www.youtube.com/michaelpennmath
non-math podcast: https://www...
we have covered argand diagrams thankfully and complex numbers
1-2 looks normal
3 looks weird il watch the video
yeah 3 is what i need to learn from
then 4 i guess
cheers
best of luck 🫡
2 should give you good intuition for 4, though
@quaint valve Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @quaint valve
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
has anyone ever been so bad at math to where you cant understand algebra like me? and if so how did you get over that mental obstacle anything helps. ive been trying for so long
do you need help with a certain question?
no im just really lost right now. i cant even pass my algebra one class im very dissapointed in myself
im a senior
meh, when word problems were hard i read lots of books
i see
I used sources like khan academy but yeah show a problem that u struggle with
yea sorry its not alot of information
what are u losing questions on
thanks
like topic
the only advice i can give is do lots of problems
well the most i know is that when soemthing is in a parentheses you add it first
and then i forgot eeverything else
and ive really tried to learn
what are you learnign in class right now
im not lazy
try reviewing them
well i remember trying to learn some stuff but its summer and i already forgot them
let me try to remember
its not a certain problem i just dont remember anything after studying it and then i study again and im like in a loop
Hi
that happened to me a lot actually
how did you get over it
the only jobs im interested in are space jobs and i really need to know math for them
olay maybe i can try that or soemthing
just do a lot of practice problems, that way youre kinda forcing yourself to be comfortable with the topic
i cant even remember what i was studying in class i didnt understand it at all
yea that makes sense
do u have ur notes?
ill try thanks
yes
read them
okay
do you have problem sets from your teacher? those help a lot
Oh uh
but most of the notes i took were in these pieces of paper that were loose they might be lost
no its all online
indont really have a teacher
ah
its just a classroom with soemone surpervising you
maybe the thing u dont understand try reading it though online
You're just asking for like, tips on how to remember stuff more concretely?
.
yea but i can remember stuff i just like cant seem to do it with math
like you search it up if you cant read it?
I search up for similar examples and yea sometimes reading
e.g proofs
Learn something, however you learn it best (whether that's visually, reading, taking notes, try yo summarize it in your own words. And then the vital last component: teach it
ohhh okay ill tey that
Let's take order of operations (PEMDAS) for example
teach it to who
but ill try
anyone
lol thats what i know about algebra and thats it
okay ill try
ohhhh okay okay
so what do you guys recommend i start with because all i know is pemdas
feel free to use #study-discussion for general advice on studying or anything related to math strategies study methods im sure a lot ppl could help u with this too
help channels are meant for math problems
Imagine this: Your teacher is explaining PEMDAS. You take notes on what each letter means. You take a 5 minute break to distract yourself and try to recall everything from memory. Congrats, you're able to remember the acronym, however a few days later...you struggle.
thanks alot man that means alot
So what do you do? You teach PEMDAS to yourself.
yea and then what
ohhhhhh
and then i can remember it
You get a pen and paper, or whatever
And you think about HOW you would explain it to someone else
That way, you're thinking about it in a way that makes sense to you
I found that I remember things much better like that
okay ill give it a shot thanks sm bro
ha okay
so what do i do after learning pemdas im lost lol
good luck man you got it
thanks alot man im trying and you too on whatever your doing
Think about how you would explain it to someone else
do you have a list of topics from the whole year?
Thats my biggest tip
or even part of the year
no my school only wants you to get your diploma and leave they dont really help you out on stuff like that
i gotta do it independently pver the summer
no😢
ok uh
do any of these sound familiar:
Arithmetic/geometric sequences
Arithmetic/geometric series
Trigonometry (sin, cos, tan)
Polynomials (quadratic formula)
Systems of equations
theres a lot more im forgetting but that should be a start
pnly arithmetic because i think thats about adding and subtracting and everything simple like that
focus on the basics, how are you going to build a bridge if you don't even know how to hammer a nail :3
yea that makes sense
i'm not entieely sure what resources but khan academy is okay for begineer stuff
okay ill use that
good luck
thanks!
good luck! you got this
thansk you too frances !
(dont forget to type .close)
@modern fable Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how to graph r = 2sectheta
on polar graph
Plug in angle as u move around
so if i plug in pi/6
Or convert it back to Cartesian
(This is easier)
r = 2sec(pi/6) whichi is sqrt(3) so its 2/sqrt(3) = r?
nah i cant do that
i have to keep it in polar
but arent i supposed to do something like change it to cos
so it becomes r = 2/cos(theta)
then i have to do one of the normal points like pi/6, pi/3, pi/4
multiplied by 2
and then that will be my theta for the points
yea but im graphing in polar
so would that point just be at (2, pi/2)
or nah
i got it
(Pi/2, 2sqrt(2))?
Closed by @dim magnet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi
Did you expand the square of the sum
@teal tangle Has your question been resolved?
hi riemann your integral sucks
yeah do this
you must be lebesgue
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Blocked
.close
Closed by @dire geode
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
If 5x+1=5y-2
If we solve for y by Algebra, we get y=3/5+x .
Why is that y=3/5+x specifically into 5y-2 will give 5x+1?
Because in my mind, it's just something algebraic that he did in order to reach to y=3/5+x. Why is it that it holds the sole key to make 5y-2 equal to 5x+1 ?
Thanks guys ^_^
Its not 2nd nature logic that pops in my mind like 2+2=4 😂😅😔
If someone can explain it step by step. I would be thankful. Maybe there is a simple idea that I'm missing and would make it clear :))
Why is that y=3/5+x specifically into 5y-2 will give 5x+1?
the unsatisfying answer is because 5(3/5 + x) - 2 = 3 + 5x - 2 = 5x+1
You probably using an equivalence reasonning to solve the algebra, thats why when you put back (the same as just going back from the end to the start) you get the same result
but tbh unless you are very algebraically skilled, you would not arrive at that answer in your head right away
at least i won't
i'd have to either use paper or do the algebra i'd do on paper in my head
@whole violet Has your question been resolved?
Well maybe study each step when you solve for y
At each step, you are performing some operation that maintains the set of (x, y) pairs which make the equation true
5x - 1 = 5y + 2
"Subtract 2 from both sides"
5x - 3 = 5y
Okay so say (x, y) made the upper equation true, equal to some value k, then the left side of the modified equation is k-2, so is the right side, so the lower equation is true.
The other steps and reasoning are left as exercises
I asked a friend and he said that the reason why it y=... holds in the original equation is that the both express the same relation.
Like if we had:
-
y +2 =5
-
y=3
-
and 2) are basically expressing the same relation and thay why 2) and can be inputted into 1) correctly.
This can be generalised further:
Let h be a function with an inverse. For variables x1, ... xn:
f(x1, ... xn) = g(x1, ... xn)
if and only if
h(f(x1, ... xn)) = h(g(x1, ... xn))
and it is also how you can spot transformations which remove information: if h is not invertible (for instance, squaring both sides), you may introduce more solutions
I asked another friend and he said that:
When equating two equations that have different variables, you come up with a condition, you solve for one of them to find this condition, which is y=3/5 + x in this case
This implies that : in order for these equations to be equal, then y has to be 3/5 more than x
This is a condition that we derive to make a conclusion
Yeah both of them are pretty much stating an aspect of the general philosophy on why we have algebraic manipulations in the first place
This example of:
y +2 =5
y= 3
is clear and obvious.
But 5y-2=5x+1
to y=x+3/5 is the same analogous speaking but not as intuitive as the one above. But I guess one must "extend" the idea.
The 2nd one is obvious in that they are the same relation because it is reversible and one came from the original. But it's not so obvious that y= x +3/5 into 5y-2 gives 5x+1. Not as obvious as y=3 into y+2=5
=p
But it's the same of ofcourse I guess
In school, I was just taught algebraic manipulations but not what they signify and I guess that's why it's confusing :))
@whole violet Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @whole violet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
boo
scared
if $(1+x+x^2)^n = a_0 + a_1x + \dots + a_{2n}x^{2n}$, find $a_0 + a_2 + \dots + a_{2n}$
rak³en
standard way would be to plug in x=1, and x=-1 and then add those expressions
is there a way to solve this by multiplying the expansion of (1-x)^n and comparing it to expansion of (1-x^3)^n
i wonder if theres a convenient way to pick out the odd numbered powers
lets start with this: how can you find a0+a1+a2+...
well he already said, x=1 and x=-1. aka roots of unity filter
I doubt that you get nice things from comparing (1-x^3)^n = (1+x+^2)^n(1-x)^n
oh
except for funny identities for binomial coefficients
i can read
When i do this type of question I just do $$\sum_{k=0}^{n}{^nC_k \cdot a^k \cdot b^{n-k}} = (a+b)^n$$ two times
Alexis_Fx
sadge
.close
Closed by @gritty galleon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
For this question, why is the answer for y=tan(4x) the last one? Im confused between the correct answer and the one to the very left of it. Don't you divide 2pi by 4x to get the period?
period of tanx is pi
generally
also the thing on the very very left is -tan(4x)
how is the 4th one different from the third?
third vs fourth
so you dont divide 2pi/4?
it repeats every pi/4 instea of every pi/2
yo
because tan is pi periodical, not 2pi periodical
can someone pls help im about to die
!occupied
unlike cos and sin
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
wha
create your own help channel
someone else is using this help channel
Read #help-13 message
please open another one
o mb
Ohhhh, so is it only cos and sin that you divide by 2pi?
if it were cos or sin, you would divide 2pi by whatever yes
Period of cos and sin is 2pi yes
since here its tan, its pi
if you mean the period, yes
Closed by @cunning plover
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
.close
Closed by @gentle lintel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
I have no idea what I've done wrong; the answer to the integral is artanh(2x) rather than 2 artanh (2x)
Sorry I forgot to include the original integral which was $\int \frac{4}{(1-4x^2)^2} dx$, and we're intended to use differentiation under the integral sign to solve it
is the first term incorrect
d/da (-1/a^2) = d/da (-a^(-2)) = 2a^(-3) should make sense no?
That did not impact the main calculation though
but yes that would be wrong as well
@warm crow Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
I've used that to check every step
,w d/da [4/(a^2 - 4x^2)^2]
so whats your problem here?
for some reason it still led to the wrong answer
Yeah
feynman technique is applicable to indefinite integrals?
The integral at the top here?
Yeah
yes, the strict technically is that your integral is pseudo-definite from 0 to another variable, so that it makes some sense
[so here from 0 to a variable alpha]
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@gentle lintel Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @gentle lintel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello.
27048 × 27044 - 27047 × 27043
Can someone tell me the shortcuts to solve this please
well the relationship between a and b is interesting
that is better captured by only using one variable
imo
i would say take u=27045
expression simplifies to 2u+1
well no matter what u you take, it always simplifies to 2u +- something small
oh ic what you mean
,w (u+4)(u) - (u+3)(u-1)
@obsidian marsh Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @obsidian marsh
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Let k>0 be a real number. On the sides (AB), (BC), (CD), (DA) of the convex quadrilateral ABCD, consider points M,N,P,Q such that AM/MB = BN/NC = CP/PD = DQ/QA = k. Find the condition that MNPQ is a parallelogram.
Im fairly new to vectors, can you give me a hint for the solve?
I have to prove that MN = PQ (vectors)
No wait
i dont think this is vectors, this just seems like geometry
may O be a random point, i have to prove that OM+OP = ON+OQ
Its at the vectors chapter tho
and id like to solve with vectors so i learn these better
wait is ABCD just any quadrilateral?
yes
actually sorry i was thinking about it wrong
its fine
i mean you can always take k=1 
but that wont get a general solution
ping helpers someone will help you out
Could you translate this perhaps
i did
.
Let k>0 be a real number. On the sides (AB), (BC), (CD), (DA) of the convex quadrilateral ABCD, consider points M,N,P,Q such that AM/MB = BN/NC = CP/PD = DQ/QA = k. Find the condition that MNPQ is a parallelogram.
np
@cobalt plover Has your question been resolved?
that's quite daunting for a vectors starter question icl
is it olympiad vectors?
where's this question from?
Gazeta Matematica, romanian math book
@cobalt plover I figured it out
With vectors or
Vectors
Nice
D is random
kk
yeah
your idea of breaking down the parallel vectors works
then k/k+1 has to be equal to 1/1+k
because those vectors in the other brackets add up to 0
sorry it took this long, I made a dumb mistake along the way
its fine
I dont know how to write it down tho
I have to look into notations, I taught all of this myself lol
basically
in triangle AMD you break vector MQ into components of MA and MD
then you break down vector DM into vectors DA and DB
you do get a nice theorem about mid-segments in a quadrilateral
@cobalt plover btw have you solved the really difficult inequality you posted like a week ago?
the sth<=4 and x+y+z=2 one
yeah
ill send you the solve
after i try to write this one down
alr
@cobalt plover Has your question been resolved?
@cobalt plover any problems you're having?
its late and i cant link what you sent
like i dont know how to write the solve down
i think im tired
alr
yeah that's super useful
I've always found it hard to incorporate side/side quantities in vector questions
where does that formula come from?
oh I learnt it while trying to solve a problem preparing for an exam
are you able to find this theorem online? would love to read the proof
the idea is vectors DB and DC are opposing each other
multiply vector DB by DC/BC and vector DC by DB/BC and their sum is 0
then just rewrite vector DB as the sum of vector DA and AB, likewise for vector DC
pretty sure it has a name but I don't study in an English-speaking environment so...
I would think it's used in some english written math problems though? 
it seems very highly useful
yea it's super useful
man I want to read more examples of this theorem
it's sorta like Stewart's theorem idk