#help-13

1 messages · Page 376 of 1

sharp pike
#

they might not be

restive oriole
#

I lowkey though this matrix wasn't square for a second before I realized I had no idea what's going on

sharp pike
#

because if you look at the simple case where n =2 they're independent shit lol

dreamy gale
#

I was thinking about Gaussian elimation

mortal grove
#

I would say try to row reduce

dreamy gale
sharp pike
#

I would try simple cases like n = 2, 3, 4

#

and try to find a pattern

#

which will motivate a general solution

mortal grove
#

I agree with that ^

dreamy gale
#

I searched up on internet and find out this is a circulant matrix so vandermonde matrix may help to calculate but the problem is this method haven’t even been mentioned in lesson at all(most importantly it’s just a beginning course for linear algebra) so I think Gaussian elimination to turn it into REF should be the method But when I wanna use it Things got really complicated I don’t even know how to start

mortal grove
#

then see if you can get it in a simpler form using gaussian elimination

dreamy gale
#

Let me try it

restive oriole
#

wait, is this matrix even square?

dreamy gale
#

Yes it’s square

#

U can see it’s an n x n matrix

sharp pike
#

each row and column is just 1-n

restive oriole
sharp pike
#

yes

dreamy gale
#

It’s n x n

sharp pike
#

and there are n rows

restive oriole
#

lowkey this is way outside my brainpower, sorry for wasting ya'lls time.

dreamy gale
#

wait is it 1

#

1**n

#

huhhh seems not

cedar kilnBOT
#

@dreamy gale Has your question been resolved?

cedar kilnBOT
#

@dreamy gale Has your question been resolved?

cedar kilnBOT
#

@dreamy gale Has your question been resolved?

dreamy gale
#

.close

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @dreamy gale

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

cedar kilnBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

wet arch
#

Need a bit of help with 14) i) also is someone could actually explain the reverse chain rule that would be great

cedar kilnBOT
#

@wet arch Has your question been resolved?

upper abyss
#

Let's say you took the derivative of (5x^2 + 3)^3. What would you get? Why should you care here?

wet arch
#

Uh

#

Wdym

#

Oh I’m doing part i

#

<@&286206848099549185>

#

<@&286206848099549185> 🙏🙏🙏🙏

cedar kilnBOT
#

@wet arch Has your question been resolved?

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

tulip stream
cedar kilnBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

spare widget
#

hi

cedar kilnBOT
spare widget
#

can anybody help

outer nova
#

What geometry do you know?

#

!show

cedar kilnBOT
#

Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.

spare widget
#

I know all the circle theorums

#

Im just bad at applying them

outer nova
#

Including cyclic quadrilateral, I presume?

spare widget
#

yes

#

I see the cyclic quadrilateral there

outer nova
#

What do the opposite angles of a cyclic quad add up to?

spare widget
#

180

outer nova
#

Alright

#

Now

#

What can you deduce about the four angles formed at C?

#

Not related to the cyclic quad

spare widget
#

they add up to 360

outer nova
#

Anything else?

spare widget
#

uhhh

#

the opposite one are equal to each otger

outer nova
#

yes!

#

particularly for us we will need to focus on angle DCF and angle BCE

#

Let's label them both y.

spare widget
#

ok

outer nova
#

Are you aware of the exterior angle theorem for triangles?

spare widget
#

uh no

#

sorry

#

I didnt know it existed

outer nova
#

uhh ok

#

it's not particularly important we can do without it

#

Observe DCF

spare widget
#

ok

outer nova
#

What can we say about angle FDC from what we've done so far?

spare widget
#

90 degrees?

#

not syre

#

sure

outer nova
#

Consider the angle sum property of the triangle

#

We have DFC=39 and DCF = y

#

We know the angles of the triangle must add up to?

spare widget
#

180

outer nova
#

So FDC must be?

spare widget
#

wait we dont have FCD yet

#

how could we know if there to uknown angles

outer nova
#

No, so just express it in terms of y

spare widget
#

oh ok

#

39+x+y?

outer nova
#

Eh

spare widget
#

im sorry

outer nova
#

FDC = 180 - 39 - y

#

Can you tell me why?

spare widget
#

yes

outer nova
spare widget
#

141

outer nova
#

Now look at ADC

#

ADC + FDC = ?

#

the angles

spare widget
#

180

outer nova
#

So angle ADC = 180 - (141-y) = ?

#

39 + y, right?

spare widget
#

yes

outer nova
#

In a similar way can you find angle ABC?

spare widget
#

ABC= 180-(133-y)

outer nova
#

i.e., ABC = 47 + y

#

Notice in both cases the exterior angle is the sum of the two opposite angles in the triangle, this is called exterior angle theorem

#

but not super important, js a fyi

spare widget
#

ok

outer nova
#

Now you can apply the cyclic quadrilateral

spare widget
#

so we found two angles in the cyclic quadrialteral

#

did we

outer nova
#

yes

#

ABC and ADC are opposite angles of the cyclic quad

#

From here, find y and give me its numerical value

spare widget
#

(47+y)+(39+y)=180

#

47+39 is

#

70+16

#

86

#

180-86

#

94

#

94/2

#

47

#

y is 47

#

is it?

#

oops

#

I did 94/2

#

wait my brain glitch

#

nvm

#

now what

#

uh

ancient lodge
#

Observe that DCF and x add to 180

spare widget
#

Ohhh

#

ok

#

x is 133?

#

yesss

#

ty for the help

#

I was struggling on that questions when practicing for test

#

I never knew how to solve

#

now I know

cedar kilnBOT
#

If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close

spare widget
#

how do I clowe

#

oh pk

#

.close

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @spare widget

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

cedar kilnBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

wary idol
#

ammonia or hydrogen sylphyte has rotten egg smell?

honest field
wary idol
#

ty

#

i cant find a good science server

honest field
#

there's one for chemistry

wary idol
#

they aren't active like this server is

#

.close

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @wary idol

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

cedar kilnBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

nimble kernel
#

Did I do this correctly

cedar kilnBOT
trim valley
nimble kernel
#

Chill

#

I know I'm good at math but during the last school year my ADHD was kinda stunting me so I'm just filling in the gaps of what I'm unsure of

trim valley
nimble kernel
#

.close

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @nimble kernel

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

cedar kilnBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

lament sedge
#

Not following a math step in veratasiums new video

lament sedge
#

he defines the h(N) function as an integral of sum

#

and then defines s(a,N) as another

#

but I don't see how s(a,n)^3 = sum of e^(i * 2pi (p1 + p2 + p3))

fringe scroll
#

exponent rules

#

$e^{i \cdot 2\pi (p_1 + p_2 + p_3)} = e^{i \cdot 2 \pi p_1} \cdot e^{i \cdot 2 \pi p_2} \cdot e^{i \cdot 2 \pi p_3}$

wraith daggerBOT
lament sedge
#

yes

fringe scroll
#

then since its an unordered triplet p1,p2,p3, when summing you can do this

#

$\sum_{p_1 \in P} \sum_{p_2 \in P} \sum_{p_3 \in P} e^{i \cdot 2 \pi p_1} \cdot e^{i \cdot 2 \pi p_2} \cdot e^{i \cdot 2 \pi p_3}$

wraith daggerBOT
lament sedge
#

yes

#

and you get the same bionomial coeficants

#

as when you cube?

fringe scroll
#

$\sum_{p_1 \in P} \sum_{p_2 \in P} \bigg( e^{i \cdot 2 \pi p_2} \cdot e^{i \cdot 2 \pi p_3}\bigg) \sum_{p_3 \in P} e^{i \cdot 2 \pi p_1}$

wraith daggerBOT
fringe scroll
#

no binomial coefficients needed

fringe scroll
#

notice that the rightmost sum is just S(a,n)

#

and you can keep repeating that

#

if you know what fubini's theorem is, its kinda like that

lament sedge
#

can you show me one more repeat

#

with the S(a,n)

lament sedge
fringe scroll
#

$$\sum_{p_1 \in P} \sum_{p_2 \in P} \bigg( e^{i \cdot 2 \pi p_2} \cdot e^{i \cdot 2 \pi p_3}\bigg) {\c r\sum_{p_3 \in P} e^{i \cdot 2 \pi p_1}} = \sum_{p_1 \in P} \sum_{p_2 \in P} \bigg( e^{i \cdot 2 \pi p_2} \cdot e^{i \cdot 2 \pi p_3} {\c r S(a,n)}\bigg)$$

wraith daggerBOT
lament sedge
#

oh you can factor out the S(a,n)

#

and the p_3 exponential

#

and so you will get another S(a,n)

fringe scroll
#

$$= {\c r S(a,n)} \sum_{p_1 \in P} \sum_{p_2 \in P} \bigg( e^{i \cdot 2 \pi p_2} \cdot e^{i \cdot 2 \pi p_1} \bigg) = {\c r S(a,n)} \sum_{p_1 \in P} \bigg(e^{i \cdot 2 \pi p_1} \sum_{p_2 \in P} e^{i \cdot 2 \pi p_2}\bigg)$$

#

yeah pretty much

wraith daggerBOT
lament sedge
fringe scroll
#

i mixed up some indices but you get the idea

lament sedge
#

how did you remove the p3 exponetioal

lament sedge
#

yeah

#

I got it thank you

fringe scroll
#

np

lament sedge
#

.close

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @lament sedge

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

cedar kilnBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

rustic gyro
#

Guys how do I turn this into a squared binomial

dire geode
wraith daggerBOT
#

riemann

rustic gyro
#

So my answer is just (x- 5/2)²?

#

Why is there a c - (b/2)² I'm confused what's that part

dire geode
#

c is 25/4

#

The "adding 0" part is important

#

When you add something to an expression, you also have to subtract the something to keep the expression the same

rustic gyro
#

Ahh okay

#

So 25/4 - (5/2)² is practically just 0?

#

okay okay

dire geode
#

Yea in this case it's a perfect square

dire geode
rustic gyro
#

When do I use this method again?

dire geode
#

No idea I'm not your teacher

cedar kilnBOT
#

@rustic gyro Has your question been resolved?

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

hushed trail
#

hey, i dont understand how to factorise this quadratic equation, could you help me?#

hushed trail
#

(x^2-2)^2 - 16

livid hound
#

do you know how to factorise a difference of two squares?

spring sonnet
hushed trail
#

im not sure what that means, sorry im new to this

spring sonnet
#

Develop the binomial and you will realize that with the change of variable to x^2 it can be solved as a normal square.

livid hound
#

do you know the factorisation for
$$a^2 - b^2 = \what$$

wraith daggerBOT
#

ℝαμOmeganato5

spring sonnet
hushed trail
#

yeah (a-b) (a+b)

livid hound
#

try applying that here

spring sonnet
normal cipher
hushed trail
livid hound
#

$16 = \what^2$

wraith daggerBOT
#

ℝαμOmeganato5

hushed trail
#

yes 4^2

livid hound
#

can you see how what you have
$$\red{(x^2-2)^2} - \blue{4^2}$$
is similar to
$$\red{a^2} - \blue{b^2}$$

hushed trail
#

16^2? or 4^2

livid hound
#

sry, typo

wraith daggerBOT
#

ℝαμOmeganato5

hushed trail
#

so (x^2-2)(x^2+2) - 4^2. is that right?

lone slate
#

Keep it as the difference of 2 squares

#

And your factorization for (x^2-2) ^2 is wrong either way

livid hound
#

can you see that you have
(something)^2 - (something else)^2

#

or something in the form
a^2 - b^2

hushed trail
#

ok, i have to go. I'll tackle this another time. cheers for the help anyways

#

.close

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @hushed trail

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

cedar kilnBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

torn marsh
cedar kilnBOT
torn marsh
#

I got both of these questions wrong

#

I was asked to differentiate

dusty wren
#

What have you done to differentiate it?

#

If you have f*g you can't just say it's differentiation is f'*g'

#

,tex.diff rules

wraith daggerBOT
#

Executor (ask on server b4 DM)

dusty wren
#

You can use the product rule as shown above

#

(for the first one)

torn marsh
#

Isn’t this a sum rule tho?

dusty wren
#

They're in multiplication

#

x^2 * x^1/2

torn marsh
#

Oh nvm yes

woven crescent
#

why is that even called the sum rule, its just distributing the d/dx lol

#

no way thats a standardized thing

dusty wren
#

As for the second one

#

How did you write 4sqrt x as sqrt 4

nova snow
torn marsh
dusty wren
#

?

#

I'm saying that's the wrong differentiation

torn marsh
#

Did I write that?

dusty wren
#

Yeah

torn marsh
#

Remix it real quick

#

Im not sure how to apply the product rule could u provide me an example @dusty wren

dusty wren
#

sinxcosx

#

when you differentiate

#

cosx * cosx - sinx * sinx

torn marsh
#

I did jot learn that

#

not

dusty wren
#

Then just combine the two powers of x

#

x^a * x^b = x^(a+b)

torn marsh
#

this is what we were given

#

rule number 3

#

can this be also used?

dusty wren
#

Nah

#

That can be used in the second one

#

It's called the sum rule

#

Product rule is different

torn marsh
#

So this can’t be used in question 7

nova snow
dusty wren
dusty wren
torn marsh
tropic oxide
#

and for q7 you don't really even need product rule unless you like algebraic suffering

dusty wren
#

Yeah I told to combine powers

tropic oxide
#

uh so where are we at

torn marsh
#

I’m just confused

#

With a 7

tropic oxide
#

ok do you want to go over one or both of these questions from the beginning then

torn marsh
#

Q7

tropic oxide
#

ok Q7

tropic oxide
#

$f(x) = x^2 \sqrt{x}$

wraith daggerBOT
tropic oxide
#

by far the least painful way of doing this is by doing some algebraic magic to the function BEFORE you take its derivative

#

and by algebraic magic i mean rewriting $x^2 \sqrt{x}$ as $x^{5/2}$

wraith daggerBOT
tropic oxide
#

do you want this explained in more detail Y/N

#

if you think you might need it explained later then say yes now

#

i dont wanna go back to it otherwise

#

[awaiting response]

torn marsh
#

I forgot about that

#

don’t explain it now Ill try the q again

tropic oxide
#

ok

torn marsh
#

Give me 3 mins

tropic oxide
#

one thing i need to mention though

#

don't equate a function to its derivative

#

the line where you actually do the differentiation should be clearly distinguished from you messing with f(x) itself

torn marsh
#

Oh yeah true

tropic oxide
#

writing things like $f(x) = x^2 = 2x$ is just no bueno at all; you should write it like:

$f(x) = x^2 \ f'(x) = 2x$

wraith daggerBOT
torn marsh
#

Should’ve been f’(x)

tropic oxide
#

but ok reattempt Q7 and send your work here

torn marsh
#

Is this correct?

tropic oxide
#

notation has an issue still

torn marsh
#

what’s the issue?

tropic oxide
#

only in the very last line do you write what the derivative is

#

like your answer of $\frac{5}{2} x^{3/2}$ is correct but you fumbled the notation and work layout

wraith daggerBOT
torn marsh
#

How is meant to be

tropic oxide
#

let me get a paper and write it out

torn marsh
#

Since we actually worked it out

tropic oxide
tropic oxide
torn marsh
#

So in the final answer?

tropic oxide
#

well in this case yes

#

but do NOT infer "the symbols f'(x) must appear in the final answer only"

torn marsh
#

so why have they not done it in the last line with these examples

tropic oxide
#

i think you either misunderstood me or read only 50% of what i wrote

#

i specifically told you NOT to imagine that there's some rule which says the symbol f'(x) must appear only at the end

#

f'(x) will appear wherever is contextually appropriate

torn marsh
#

Oh ok so why is it

#

Appropriate in my case

tropic oxide
#

you will not like the literal answer to that question

#

so i will instead say dont overthink it

#

@torn marsh you still here?

torn marsh
#

yes

tropic oxide
#

ok do you have anything else to ask about Q7 Y/N

torn marsh
#

Y but specifically about the f’(x)

dry bluff
# torn marsh Oh so from the third line, we equate it to f’(x)?

Your issue is you're assuming f(x) and f'(x) are the same. They are not.
You're not understanding the derivative as an operator, something that takes in an input (a function f(x)), and transforms it into a completely, different output (the derivative, or f'(x)).

Ann has been trying to explain to you that f(x) = x²√(x) = x^(5/2) will never be equal to f'(x) as they are fundamentally different.

I'll give an example. Say f(x) is a food and f'(x) is when you put the food in the blender.
f(x) = banana
f'(x) = banana puree

Your error is just like saying the banana is the same as the banana puree, when it's obviously not.

tropic oxide
tropic oxide
dry bluff
#

GOD that was an embarassing analogy

dusty wren
#

banana puree MenheraThink1

tropic oxide
#

@torn marsh

torn marsh
#

yes I was reading the above

torn marsh
dry bluff
tropic oxide
# tropic oxide

i showed you how i'd write the solution to Q7 following your format

torn marsh
#

No I don’t

dry bluff
#

you equated two different things

tropic oxide
dry bluff
#

x^(5/2) does not equal 5/2 x^(3/2)

tropic oxide
#

do you want me to bring back the images where i did it

#

your work contained this error: you wrote f'(x) = [something that ISN'T f'(x)]

#

does that make sense to you Y/N

torn marsh
#

I get what ur tryna say but I don’t seem to get why it’s an error

tropic oxide
#

writing an equals sign between two things that arent equal

#

is it not obvious why thats wrong

torn marsh
#

Oh ok I get it now

#

But the whole purpose is me tryna find the derivative right

tropic oxide
#

yes sure

dry bluff
torn marsh
#

So if I equate it to the end that’s just the same issue but at the end

torn marsh
tropic oxide
#

not really the time or place to wonder about meaning

dry bluff
tropic oxide
dry bluff
#

LOL okay

honest field
#

e^x:

dry bluff
#

but I'm generalizing

tropic oxide
#

anyway it is like trying to tell someone to imagine the texture of an apple when they're trying to spell the word "APPLE" -- it's unhelpful

dry bluff
#

Okay I'll get out of here

honest field
torn marsh
tropic oxide
tropic oxide
#

forget about it

torn marsh
#

yea mb

tropic oxide
#
  1. do you have anything else left to ask about Q7 Y/N
  2. do you have anything else left to ask about your work Y/N
  3. do you want to move on to Q8 Y/N
    (answer each question separately)
honest field
torn marsh
#

About the same issue if that’s okay cuz I don’t wanna get marksed down

tropic oxide
#

ok you didnt tell me which of my 3 questions you were answering so i have to assume it's about my 2nd

dry bluff
tropic oxide
#

from my pov it's a writing issue

torn marsh
#

Yeah the function cannot equal f’(x) because f(x) is just a graph and not the gradient

honest field
#

ye idk at first he just doesnt know which rule to use to solve

tropic oxide
#

so let me summarize this for the like 3rd or 4th time:

when writing your work for taking the derivative of a function, it is very often the case that you do some algebraic magic to it before the actual differentiation step(s), or after the actual differentiation step(s), or both.
for this reason it's important to clearly demarcate in your work where the actual differentiation happens.
and this is why you have to write f(x) = foo = bar = baz ... and then f'(x) = other-foo = other-bar = other-baz ...

honest field
tropic oxide
#

@torn marsh does this make enough sense to you that we dont have to return to this later

torn marsh
#

i think it’s better for you to write it on paper with examples, instead of me focusing on words

#

this is a difficult concept for me to grasp

void spoke
#

hell you can club powers if they are of the same base as they were in your question like x^2 . √x
law of exponents says
x^a.x^b=x^(a+b)
Moreover you can also check product rule which says
If they are two function f and g and you have two differentiate f*g with respect to a variable
you get the answer as f'g+fg'

tropic oxide
void spoke
#

I like tried to explain in three respects

void spoke
tropic oxide
#

do you want some more complicated differentiation problem where i could illustrate how this algebraic work is done

#

@torn marsh

void spoke
torn marsh
#

yes sure

void spoke
#

Lemme get 1

torn marsh
#

I’m responding to @tropic oxide

void spoke
#

Ok

tropic oxide
#

...

#

@void spoke i think it would be better if you let me handle this on my own.

void spoke
#

Yea no problem

#

👍

torn marsh
tropic oxide
void spoke
#

Nah man say thanks to Ann

#

She is helping you

#

👍

tropic oxide
#

im gonna try and produce work with commentary

torn marsh
#

cuz I don’t have any

tropic oxide
#

ok as you say, gimme like 5-10 minutes

torn marsh
#

ofcourse

tropic oxide
#

if my handwriting's not clear at any stage please tell me and i can tell you what i wrote.

torn marsh
#

I like ur handwriting dw

#

I havnt learned the chain rule yet

tropic oxide
#

blech

#

well... i think my point about laying out your work still basically stands, doesn't it

#

obviously you don't have to write any of these comments in green or number your lines in red like i did -- i only did that for illustration purposes

#

but you see now roughly how to lay out your work in the proper way, right?

torn marsh
#

Yes, I get the gist of it now

tropic oxide
#

ok

#

do you want to go over Q8 then

torn marsh
#

I’ll attempt it again

#

for now I’ll close the ticket

#

.closs

#

.close

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @torn marsh

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

quasi flint
#

Let A and B be two independent witness in a case. The probability that A will speak the truth is x and the probability that B will speak the truth is y. A and B agree in a certain statement. Find the probability that this statement is true?

quasi flint
#

Help me with this

tropic oxide
#

!status

cedar kilnBOT
#
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
quasi flint
#

1

tropic oxide
#

ok

#

so A and B are sitting in separate rooms and dont hear each others answers (and in fact they're just called independent witnesses to reinforce this)

#

do you understand what it means for A and B to agree on a certain statement? Y/N

quasi flint
#

Y

tropic oxide
#

ok explain in your own words

#

what does it mean for A and B to agree

quasi flint
#

Well it means A AND B WILL give a common statement

tropic oxide
#

ok thats true but i expected a bit more detail

#

A and B are either both telling the truth, or both lying.

#

does this make sense to you

quasi flint
#

Yes

tropic oxide
#

ok

#

can you work out the probability that A and B would agree in the first place?

#

the question asks for P(true | agreement) so we're working out P(agreement) as a stepping stone for that

quasi flint
tropic oxide
#

A and B are either both telling the truth, or both lying.

quasi flint
#

So 50 50

#

?

tropic oxide
#

extremely off the mark

#

P(A truth) = x
P(B truth) = y
this is stated in your question

quasi flint
#

Yes

tropic oxide
#

your answer will involve the letters x and y

#

P(agreement) = P(A truth & B truth) + P(A lie & B lie)

#

do you understand this Y/N

quasi flint
#

X/x+y for a?

tropic oxide
#

there are unfortunately at least 3 things wrong with what you just said

#

so no, try again. read what i said once more.

#

A and B are either both telling the truth, or both lying.
P(agreement) = P(A truth & B truth) + P(A lie & B lie)

P(A truth) = x
P(B truth) = y
A and B's responses are independent

#

dont try to guess

quasi flint
#

Okay but isnt it possible one is telling the truth

#

While other not

tropic oxide
#

no because then they would be disagreeing...

quasi flint
#

I see

#

Now i get it

tropic oxide
#

you "get it" as in you need no more help?

#

or you get it as in you can work out what i told you to & continue with me?

quasi flint
tropic oxide
quasi flint
#

I meant i just understood the p(agreement)

lilac flame
#

Got real quiet

quasi flint
#

Be back after reading some basic stuff xd

#

😭

#

Otherwise i cant calculate

lilac flame
#

Do you know what conditional probability is?

quasi flint
#

I do know the defination

#

Its when even of A depends on event of B

tropic oxide
#

ok

#

hold on

#

lets not get off track

#

i gave haruki something to do

#

im waiting for him to actually do it

quasi flint
#

Yup

lilac flame
#

Riyal

tropic oxide
quasi flint
#

I am getting 2xy-x-y+1

lilac flame
#

Hmm theres a sign mistake i believe

quasi flint
#

Typo

tropic oxide
#

xy + (1-x)(1-y) would've been fine too but yes that is correct now

#

ok

#

so do you see how to proceed from here?

quasi flint
#

We have to check weather its true but idk how

tropic oxide
#

no we don't have to "check" anything.

#

we have to find the probability that A and B are both telling the truth given that they are in agreement.

quasi flint
#

So conditional

tropic oxide
#

you should already know that P(both truth) = xy

tropic oxide
tropic oxide
#

you should also understand that P(both truth & agreement) = P(both truth) because obviously both ppl telling the truth implies they're in agreement

#

so you got your numerator and you got your denominator

#

that's almost it

quasi flint
tropic oxide
#

i mean it in the most literal sense

#

you know $P(\text{truth} | \text{agreement}) = \frac{P(\text{truth})}{P(\text{agreement})}$

wraith daggerBOT
tropic oxide
#

and you know P(agreement)

#

and you know P(truth)

#

youve already done 95% of the work

quasi flint
#

Okay i got it

#

So the answer is $xy/(1-x-y+2xy)$

wraith daggerBOT
#

Haruki

lilac flame
#

Yoooo cook

tropic oxide
wraith daggerBOT
tropic oxide
#

this is how you make fractions

quasi flint
#

@tropic oxide thanks

cedar kilnBOT
#

@quasi flint Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @quasi flint

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

drowsy obsidian
cedar kilnBOT
upper ruin
#

A substitution such as t = e^x really helps

ember heath
#

U van factorize it

wintry monolith
#

Yes

#

Then u can see a root clearly

#

Synthetic division

drowsy obsidian
#

Ok

#

Trying

wintry monolith
#

There is a short cut tho

drowsy obsidian
#

I divided by e^2x on both sides

#

Then subb e^2x =t

upper ruin
dusty wren
drowsy obsidian
#

To make it quadratic

#

Easier to solve

dusty wren
#

Yeah but you're still left with a 1/t^2 on rhs

wintry monolith
#

No just

#

Put exp as t

#

Then one root is 1

#

U can see

ember heath
wintry monolith
#

Divide the polynomial by

#

X-1

#

U will get a cubic

#

also at the last

#

Ignore the negative roots

#

And roots below 1

#

Cause exp minimum value is 1

drowsy obsidian
#

I am trying

drowsy obsidian
dusty wren
#

Long division

wintry monolith
#

If u want u can also use derivatives

drowsy obsidian
#

Ok

#

Later

dusty wren
wintry monolith
#

U can also use

#

Sign change method

#

But it’s very much a rough idea to get real roots

drowsy obsidian
#

Hmmmm

#

I got it

#

By substitution

#

Thanks guyz!

#

.close

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @drowsy obsidian

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

cedar kilnBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

wind forge
#

don't know what to do with the x

cedar kilnBOT
oblique flare
wind forge
#

yeah about that

honest field
#

set condition x>3 first

wind forge
#

does the base get added to each other ?

dusty wren
#

Remember to check domain

oblique flare
dusty wren
#

,tex.log rules

wraith daggerBOT
#

Axe cutter (ask on server b4 DM)

dusty wren
#

First one

wind forge
#

yeah I know

oblique flare
dusty wren
#

The base remains the same

wind forge
#

oh

oblique flare
#

never changing (unless using the base change one)

wind forge
#

wait lemme show u guys

oblique flare
#

Ok

wind forge
oblique flare
wind forge
#

umm

#

I'm getting log_2(x^2-3x)=2

oblique flare
wind forge
#

I'm stuck at this

tropic oxide
#

how would you solve log_2(z)=2

wind forge
#

wait

#

1 I guess ?

tropic oxide
#

no guessing

#

have you done your reading on logarithms since we last spoke?

wind forge
#

yess

wind forge
tropic oxide
#

this is very basic and should never be neglected or forgotten

wind forge
#

wait

#

which property is this

#

oh

#

no

#

wait

tropic oxide
#

definition of log

wind forge
#

i know this

#

yeah

#

this is the basic

#

I just get confuse with the variables

tropic oxide
#

yeah well that's what practice is for innit

wind forge
#

Isn't it ?

tropic oxide
#

2^1=2 but z isn't 1

#

you're confusing the placement

#

a and b are both 2 while z is z

wind forge
#

I don't understand

#

then what should be z

tropic oxide
#

ok i think maybe i should color code things

#

@wind forge look at this

#

stare at it for a minimum of 37 seconds

wind forge
#

37 seconds

#

wow alr

tropic oxide
#

does it make sense to you now

wind forge
#

yess

#

very much

tropic oxide
#

do you see how to continue

#

there will be an important point at the end

wind forge
wind forge
tropic oxide
#

ok

wind forge
#

although I doubt I can do it correctly

tropic oxide
#

well try anyway and send your work on paper

wind forge
oblique flare
wraith daggerBOT
tropic oxide
#

so far so good

#

keep going

wind forge
#

wow

#

I'm doing it correct ?

oblique flare
#

yes

tropic oxide
#

yes as i said

wind forge
#

so now middle term split ?

tropic oxide
#

it's a quadratic

#

solve it in any way you want

wind forge
#

k

#

wait

tropic oxide
#

when you get the roots of the quadratic, STOP and pause

wind forge
#

I'm getting -1/2 and -5/2

oblique flare
wind forge
#

i used the quadratic formula

#

and inserted the values

oblique flare
#

did you use brackets at least because i think some values got messed up

wind forge
#

well I did it mind

#

just wrote the formula and final answer

#

lol

#

wait lemme do it on paper again

oblique flare
#

do it again and check

wind forge
#

Im getting

#

+1 and -4 now

oblique flare
wind forge
#

which one is right

#

wait

#

I'm getting the same again

oblique flare
#

it should be x=1 and x=4 (but there is a restriction we'll cover later)

#

like you could factor it (the easiest of the three methods)

wind forge
#

but -3-5 = -8

#

and -8/2 = -4

oblique flare
wind forge
#

when does the sign change in quadratic formula

oblique flare
wind forge
#

wait

#

yeah

#

I got it

#

-1 and +4

#

now what

oblique flare
#

last thing tho

#

one of these isn't a solution

wind forge
#

fantastic

#

I'm loving this

oblique flare
#

log(z) only works when z>0 z could be any argument so go back to your question and check what x should be greater than

wind forge
#

4 ?

oblique flare
#

x=4 only works because ofc log(x-3) then x should be larger than 3

tropic oxide
#

you should NEVER do things in your head

#

with maybe one exception

wind forge
wind forge
tropic oxide
#

if you are 110% confident that you could be woken up by burglars at 3 in the morning and placed at gunpoint to do something on your first try, without mistakes

#

THEN you can do it in your head.

#

otherwise no.

wind forge
#

nice way to put it

oblique flare
wind forge
#

what should I do with the 4 ?

#

x = 4

#

so

#

just insert the value ?

tropic oxide
#

now there's one important note

#

the domain of logarithmic functions

#

do you know what kind of values x can be in order for log_2(x) to exist?

#

(if not, you're about to find out)

wind forge
#

I got it guys

#

its

#

log_2 4=2

tropic oxide
#

x>0 that's right.

wind forge
#

Oh

#

wait

#

oh

tropic oxide
#

the stuff inside a log function has to be positive.

wind forge
#

he said it's wrong

tropic oxide
#

who did

#

where

wind forge
tropic oxide
#

yeah cause "not 0" is the wrong condition

#

the right condition is that x should be positive

wind forge
#

yeah my bad

#

mmhm

tropic oxide
#

and when you've got multiple logs in an equation they all need to have positive numbers in the argument

wind forge
#

that's why I corrected it

#

cuz not zero can be -ve

tropic oxide
#

so you need to check x=-1 and separately from that x=4 against the following criteria:

  • is x itself > 0?
  • is x - 3 > 0?
wind forge
#

alr

cedar kilnBOT
#

@wind forge Has your question been resolved?

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

icy rune
#

Does anyone know how to solve this?

cedar kilnBOT
raven anvil
icy rune
#

Me too

raven anvil
#

Is this regex?

icy rune
#

yep

raven anvil
#

I skipped this during my coding tutorial

icy rune
#

i dont think this will be in the exam so im thinking about skipping it too ngl

raven anvil
#

I'm a high school student, skipping this worked for me. Idk about you

icy rune
#

my guess was 1((2+3)* + ((2+3)1)*)

icy rune
raven anvil
clear umbra
#

it probably wont tbh

icy rune
#

sadly no, i tried that one before 2

clear umbra
#

yeah i figured

icy rune
raven anvil
icy rune
#

ou're asking for a regular expression that describes the language where "11", "22", and "33" are not substrings, without using the special regular expression metacharacters ? or !.

This is a very challenging, if not impossible, constraint for most practical regular expression engines, especially for an arbitrarily long string.

#

Im skipping this one😰

south tundra
#

If you are comfortable with finding regex of a language accepted by a DFA, it is clearly easier to construct a DFA accepting L and do that

icy rune
#

I constructed a DFA for that i think

#

But still cant find regex for that

#

smth like this maybe?

#

I think this is correct

south tundra
#

Why is every state accepting?

icy rune
#

cuz they dont include 11,22, and 33

#

that means empty,1,2,3,13,12, etc are also accepting or no

south tundra
#

Every state being accepting means the DFA will accept any string

#

Oh, what you have is an NFA

icy rune
#

oh yep

#

mb

south tundra
#

Pretty sure you don’t need this many states though

icy rune
#

yeah could be, this is what came to mind first

#

but imma be honest, the regex still doesnt seem clear to me

#

😢

south tundra
#

I can’t really write anything down at the moment, I will be back in 20 mins unless someone else takes over

icy rune
#

okay thx

quasi merlin
#

(1|2|3)((1|2|3)(1|2|3)+)?

Could this work?

icy rune
#

nope dont think os

quasi merlin
#

Ohhh I misinterpreted the task

#

That is much harder

icy rune
#

yep

south tundra
#

@icy rune Well, remember that you want your DFA to simply detect a pair of same symbols being next to each other and there are only 3 symbols, so you can get away with using just 5 states: one start state, three states representing which symbol was read last and a reject state

cedar kilnBOT
#

@icy rune Has your question been resolved?

south tundra
#

But yeah it's still a pain to convert this

quasi merlin
#

Pretty small DFA tho

icy rune
#

ill just skip this one

#

ty for ur help though

icy rune
cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

cedar kilnBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

quasi flint
cedar kilnBOT
quasi flint
#

I have no clue how to prove this

glossy inlet
#

what's alpha

hidden mural
#

isn't Poisson rv discrete

quasi flint
bronze prairie
# quasi flint

Hi! Here's a tip to set you on the right direction. If you take P(X<n) = sum of probability from 0 to n, notice that if we differentiate this expression with regards to the parameter mu, something interesting will happen.

#

It's kind of a magic trick! But it will lead to the expression you have here

glossy inlet
#

is alpha meant to be mu or something

#

tbf that does make it the poisson pmf

#

And the CDF' = PDF thing holds KEK

bronze prairie
#

Noticably... ||p'(k) = -p(k) + p(k+1)||! So this can help you get the final desired expression

cedar kilnBOT
#

@quasi flint Has your question been resolved?

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

short hatch
#

when trying root test i also get 1 (i stopped at the end).
what should i do?
any other test?
maybe i have a mistake?

flint plinth
#

do you know stirling's approximation?

short hatch
#

yep

#

i used it in one of the pictures

flint plinth
#

ah i see, i didn't even look at the second picture yet

#

let me take al ook

#

i agree with your first picture, the ratio test gives you 1, so indeterminate

short hatch
#

also in the second picture it's indeterminate

#

[
(2\pi k)^{1/(2k)} = \pi^{1/(2k)} \cdot (2k)^{1/(2k)}
]

wraith daggerBOT
short hatch
#

so it's 1

#

and the k-th root is also one

flint plinth
#

maybe instead of using the root test, try to do a limit comparison test, also using stirling's approximation?

#

i haven't tried it yet so i don't know if it will work

short hatch
#

but compare it to what

#

maybe the necessary condition for convergence doesn't work

#

cause it doesn't go to 0

flint plinth
#

yea if you were to just naively replace k! with the stirling approximation, the terms of the series simplify to sqrt(2 pi k), which suggests that you should be able to show divergence by finding a lower bound that diverges

short hatch
#

ok got it

#

tysm

flint plinth
#

in particular these bounds should be useful:

short hatch
#

Works

flint plinth
#

nice

cedar kilnBOT
#

@short hatch Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @short hatch

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

livid marten
#

MNKl parallelogram. Side NK is twice the length of MN. The bisector of M hitting line NK is point A. The bisector of N hitting line ML is point B. If AB=15, find the perimeter.

livid marten
#

so far I’ve been trying to think

normal cipher
livid marten
#

?

normal cipher
#

Oh wait

#

Where are you stuck at

livid marten
#

I’m not sure how to find X

normal cipher
#

Are you stuck at relating 15 to x

#

Okay

livid marten
#

Ok

normal cipher
#

Okay

#

Label the center of the NMBA as O

livid marten
#

Ok

normal cipher
#

We want to show that NMBA is a parallelogram, more specifically a rhombus, right?

#

Then were done

livid marten
#

NMBA is not exactly a parallelogram, when I drew it, it just came to look like one 😭

livid marten
#

Oh rlly?

normal cipher
#

It is supposed to be a rhombus

livid marten
#

Oh

normal cipher
#

Sometimes your drawing gives you clues

normal cipher
livid marten
#

Because NO=OB and MO=OA?

normal cipher
#

Were done

#

The four triangles are congruent

livid marten
#

So ur saying X=15?

normal cipher
#

Namely NOM, MOB, BOA, AON

normal cipher
livid marten
#

that means the perimeter is 90. But there aren’t 90 in the answers..

normal cipher
#

wat

livid marten
#

The answers I’m given is
A. 30 B. 21 C. 20 D. 25 E. 46

#

that’s why I’m literally stuck

normal cipher
#

wtf

livid marten
#

I spent the last hour trying to make sense why it isn’t 90 or maybe 60 or smth

normal cipher
#

pmo mb i cant find an answer then

livid marten
#

Alr

#

it’s ok lol

#

should I close it yet tho?

lone slate
livid marten
#

alr

lone slate
#

@livid marten I think you could do some angle chasing, I don't really know

normal cipher
#

i cant find anything wrong with my method

#

it should definitely be a rhombus

livid marten
#

At first

lone slate
raven shard
livid marten
raven shard
#

there is at least one error in this transcription it seems

raven shard
# livid marten Yes

really? "The bisector of M hitting line MN" ? at the very least this surely can't be right

livid marten
#

Oh it’s just a letter mistake but the drawing

raven shard
#

yes i am asking if there are more errors in the text you posted

lone slate
#

Hmm

lone slate
#

Other than the one you drew*

livid marten
lone slate
#

Hmm

livid marten
#

I’m unable to send the picture because it’s in completely different language

cedar kilnBOT
#

Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.

livid marten
#

Am I supposed to reply the question to it?

lone slate
#

Idk u could do angle chasing mahbe??

normal cipher
livid marten
raven shard
#

the "answer" to the question as it is written is 90

livid marten
#

What is this question aurghsgsha. Why doesn’t it say 90 on the answers I’m so done

cedar kilnBOT
#

@livid marten Has your question been resolved?

livid marten
#

actually let’s just end it

#

.close

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @livid marten

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

cedar kilnBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

signal oak
#

hello its been a while since I've done multivar calc

signal oak
#

can someone check my chain rule saku_sweat2

#

specifically for the u_xx part ..

dire geode
#

What even is the original question

signal oak
#

original question was a pde

#

need to change of coordinates y= x-at to get rid of the constant a to solve the pde

dire geode
#

Yea then your second order partial is correct

signal oak
#

since i was changing coordinate systems i needed to uhhahhh use some chain rule and then i realized i forgot how to do u_xx chain rule so i had to reread my old notes

signal oak
#

.close

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @signal oak

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

fringe moth
#

Id need help with some math questions

cedar kilnBOT
fringe moth
#

What is the value of the definite integral of the function f(x)=e^−x calculated between x=0 and x=1 ?

#

I am familiar with integrals, in fact I studied them 1 year ago but forgot most of it

#

I'm not sure where to start

mental trail
#

FTC

#

find an antiderivative

fringe moth
# mental trail find an antiderivative

just for curiosity, I dont remember doing this type of step while I studied integrals, is this specifically related to this type of question or its common while resolving integrals?

mental trail
#

Uh, it's common

fringe moth
#

okay thank you

hollow trail
#

that's what you do as a first step for like 90% of definite integrals

fringe moth
#

Ill get on it

#

Im a bit rusty with math

#

Okay I understand what is antiderivative

#

isn't it (e^-x+1)/1+(-x)?

#

since ∫x^n = (x^n+1)/1+n

mental trail
#

x^n.

#

x is the variable

#

n is a constant

#

you have e^(-x)

fringe moth
#

thats clear

mental trail
#

so

fringe moth
#

so whats wrong

mental trail
#

x is the variable

#

x^n dx

#

leads to x^(n+1)/n+1

fringe moth
#

so Im supposed to do e+1?

mental trail
#

no

uneven tiger
#

Int e^x=e^x

fringe moth
#

since ln is always e