#help-13
1 messages · Page 370 of 1
sec I havent checked it so far mb
its all given bro just see the latex part
$A = \pi r^2 + \pi r s = \pi r (r + s)$
tobi
this
@feral juniper
bro he obviously didn't mean it like that
my question is
is the second picture related to the first
cuz it looks like two entirely different questions to me
i dont want these huge formulas
in the first and the second picture
and you dont have enough information in the first picture
what is that calculation supposed to represent?
this is my working
read the ENTIRE question bro
u will get it
okay how did you do b) ?
$\pirl - piRl$
bagelguy3
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
go to latex testing pls
that gives 4000pi
just read it and do the last part
I already did
do you agree with me that the surface Area for the cone can be represented with this formula
$A = \pi r^2 + \pi r l = \pi r (r + l)$
tobi
this is what you derived
where A is the surface area
r is the radius (in the case of b) its 40cm))
and l is 60cm (in the case of b))
so A is adding up the curved surface area which is
pi r l
and the area of the circle
which is
pi r^2
$A = \pi{R}l - \pi{r}l$
bagelguy3
thats the formula
for the CSA of the part
part of the cone
like in the figure
curved part
whats the answer?
of?
I still cant figure out if they are asking for TSA or CSA
total surface area of curved SA?
"ye" isn't an answer to a question where you have to choose
no
what happend here
please solve the question
!nosols for the helpers :shrug:
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
bro i dont know how to do it
i maen
i know how to do it
see my method and correct it
its just the last part
im not even asking u to do more
where is your method
read the question, the entire question
and then see this
and tell me why its wrong
i already know the answer
the answer is 3800 pi
i dont need to copy
from shit
1000 is also including the small circle
so i removed that
and added the small circles area
if you think about it, 4000pi is the whole cone including the base, the 1000pi is all of the top cone including the base, so essentially you want to add the area of the smaller circle, but instead your subtracting the small circle then adding the small circle which cancels eachother out, leaving the top circle still not calculated
which is 20^2 pi
i am subracting the entire upper cone, and adding the small circle
yes but subtracting the entire upper cone also subtracts the small circle
Closed by @dim gulch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help
how do i solve x+5 = 2x-1 i forgot it
walahi
?
move the x terms and the constants to one side
@lusty thunder Has your question been resolved?
yep got it
Closed by @lusty thunder
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
If I've got an equation log(a) = b, how do I see that increasing b will increase a?
to what base?
Presumably 10 if none is shown
Do you want to see or prove ?
In reality the equation looks like this so it's harder for me to see it. They claim that increasing I will increase gamma
note that x^(1/2) and log(x) are both increasing functions
oh yeah
So it'll be like gamma = 10^(-RHS)
What does the plus minus imply by gamma?
and then the bigger the I in the RHS is, the more negative the power will be, and then the gamma will be smaller
long story lol
In thermodynamics, an activity coefficient is a factor used to account for deviation of a mixture of chemical substances from ideal behaviour. In an ideal mixture, the microscopic interactions between each pair of chemical species are the same (or macroscopically equivalent, the enthalpy change of solution and volume variation in mixing is zero)...
if you want to learn about it
Eeeek, I live in denial of maths outside of pure maths
Physical chemistry course 👍
I'll check it out though
Yeah afaik it's the average activity coefficient of a + and - ion
something like that
It's a positive number though
Makes sense to be, since coefficient are generally measures of ratios
The equation I sent is called the Debye-Huckel limiting law
Seeing maths applied to describe real world phenomena is the coolest shit
@inland bone Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @inland bone
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Find the maximum
Of a finction given with this equation
(x^2+y^2)^3-3(x^2+y^2)+1=0
So I started doing this
What do I do wrong?
I can't find any point that works
I have a historia to use a Darboux theorem to estimate the y(x0)
.close
Closed by @ornate sinew
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@dusty lava Has your question been resolved?
have you used the compound angle identity before?
It states that $\sin{(x+y)} = \sin{x}\cos{y} + \sin{y}\cos{x}$
rep
i dont think this can be simplified further
o
did you convert the 30 degrees ones into their actual values
with the one on the right
also you can convert a sin x + b cos x to Rcos(x+a)
so maybe harmonic form can be useful
but maybe that would just put it back to where it was before idk
yeah its definitely hard
Use this and you obtain an expression in terms of sinx and cosx
Then use half angle to obtain a further expression
@dusty lava Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can somebody explain differentiate (x+y) wrt x will it be 1 or 2
$\dv{(x+y)}{x}=\dv{x}{x}+\dv{y}{x}=1+0=1$
That i kind of get it but how would i know where should i take y as a constant and where not i mean in which ques
Bonk
i dont understand what you mean
So should i always take y as constant when it differentiating wrt x
Ok that is what i wanted to know
i wouldnt say always
(assuming y isnt a function of x)
yes that
It isn't
if y is a function of x then almost always not constant wrt x
Like can u look in my ques it isn't right fn of x
you are basically doing chain rule
Yeah but i didn't do it for some time so i'm forgetting very basic things
where
$f(x,y)=e^x+e^y$?
Bonk
this one?
e^x + e^y = e^x+y differentiate
what?
1st one in black
$e^x+e^y\neq e^{x+y}$
Bonk
That is a ques
like, for which x and y its true?
No it was something else i had to prove differentiate
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
Are u still here?
How so?
!xy
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
I had to differentiate all of it differentiate e^x + differentiate e^y = differentiate e^x+y
with respect to what?
x or y
btw, in this question i think y(x)
So should i not take y as a constant
Can u try to solve it
!nosols
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
continue from here
what do you get
This is how guy did it on yt whom i was learning
yes but try doing that yourself
I have
$\dv{}{x}\left(e^x+e^{y(x)}=e^{x+y(x)}\right)$
Bonk
Yeah i got confused with differentiation of x+y
$\dv{(e^{x+y(x)})}{x}=e^{x+y(x)}\dv{(x+y(x))}{x}=e^{x+y(x)}\left(\dv{x}{x}+\dv{y(x)}{x}\right)=e^{x+y}\left(1+\dv{y}{x}\right)$
Bonk
make sense?
A sec lemme try it out by myself once more
then i think you can solve from here
So should i just bluntly take d(x+y)/dx equal to 1
then its just algebra
?
i just showed you its not 1
.close
.close
Closed by @tall ibex
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
$\dv{(x+y(x)}{x}=\dv{(x)}{x}+\dv{(y(x))}{x}=1+\dv{y}{x}$
Bonk
and $\dv{y}{x}\neq 0$
Bonk
Isn't this is how u do it?
Or am i really really stupid that i forgot the very basics
.close
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, I need help with this. How do I solve these?
Oh and a=4
The same way you solve them when there are 2 eqns in 2 unknowns
And how do you solve those?
Well, there are several methods, I don't know which ones you've been taught
kramer method
for the first question add all simaltaneous equations
which cancels all z
In my country they are called reduction, substitution , comparison, Cramer
Or Gauss reduction of you're studying linear algebra
gauss best
Yep, but at highschool I've never seen it being used
can anyone help me?
How do I do that?
mine is help-34
i need answer and explanation
Literally you add all three equations, side by side
Please do not advertise your help channel or thread in other parts of the server. There are many people who need help, so advertising can quickly turn into spam.
So on the RHS you'll get -13-4+5 which equals -12
that doesnt work
Why not? It was you who suggested this btw 😅
I don't think that's how it's supposed to be
If I'm not wrong
yeah now i see why because we would only get 1 equation for 2 terms , rest would be for 3 terms
Well yeah but from the addition of the three you get x in terms of y or viceversa, since z cancels out
That's the main goal of adding equation
bro we need atleast 2 equations to solve 2 term simaltaenous equation
wait i gotta go get a book and pencil
i think i have an idea
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
Yeah the last two together
I need the answer to see how to solve them tho
i think i understand it now lowkey
ok so first step
use the first equation and get a value for z in terms of x and y
The purpose of this server is to help you learn, not to hand out answers. Do not ask someone to give you the answer directly.
bro if someone is outmatched then?
So basically I solve this one
yeah
How am I supposed to learn how to do them if someone doesn't show/explain how to do them tho
But in my notes I solve it in a different way
I don't know how to explain it in English
just send a photo
There are a lot of ways to solve it
Basically I start by making it into
|1 4 2|
|3 5 1|
|4 7 1|
It should be clear that it's better to find x, instead of y or z. Because x has a coefficient of 1
The entire thing
best way for anyone to understand is to align the new information with previous information'
its probably gauss method
Or Cramer, since there's a determinant
Well, then tell it! Otherwise we're explaining things you've not seen in class 🙈
i will try to teah gauss
so basically the first step is to write it in form of
1st equation| x y z | (answer of the equation)
2nd equatio| x y z |(answer of the 2nd)
3rd equatio| x y z|(answer of the 3rd)
i dont know carmer , they dont teach me carmer or gauss in school
learned it for fun
tell me what u get
|() , () , () | ()
|() , () , () | ()
|() , () , () | ()
copy and edit this'
1st I get
X= 4y+2z-13
Is this the correct way?
nah just write the number not the variable
like 1 , -4 , -2 | -13
yeah
Ohhhh I see
| x -4y -2z = -13
| 3x -5y +z = -4
| 4x -7y + z = 5
|1 -4 -2| -13
|3 -5 1| -4
|4 -7 1| 5
(I'm just writing it so I can write it later easier)
After that we do?
now 2nd step is to get 1st value(in 1st equation) = 1 , other values in 1st equation should be equal to 0(except answer of equation) and 2nd value in 2nd equation = 1 , (others should be equal to 0, except answer of equation) , same with 3rd equation
we do this by subtracting 2 equations
we can multiply (the equations)
Soo it needs to be:
|1 0 0| -13
|0 1 0| -4
|0 0 1| 5
yeah but i bet the equation answers would be changed
when u are subtracting equation the answer of it also gets subtracted
or multiplying
i suggest give variable to each equation line
think of it like vector
yeah
Wait it's correct m
it is , this litterly was the easiast part
Don't I just get this?
Wait no
I'm stupid
how
u confusing it
and the goal is to get only one ''1'' value on LHS others should be 0, for the 1st equation
How do I do that?
u can divide it by some number or subtract 2 lines(can also multiply like 2(line c)-line a)
Cramer method or elementary row operation
its different for each simaltaenous equation
Like this?
u dont have to divide every thing u can also divide one line
anyways the point is to get a single value(even work if its not 1) on LHS but only in a single row, what i am trying to say is the should only be 1 value in 1 row(not zero) LHS
Like this?
This seems helpful
do what ever to get sigle value(rest should be 0 on lhs)
Soo something like this?
exactly right!
yo can u carry from here?
sure np
So now I do this?
Is what I get if I do what I do?
you subtracted wqrong
Is this better?
Is this better?
yes!
yea they are
Wait do I have a time limit on using the Chanel? I need to go to sleep but still need help
after a while itll ask if your problem has been solved
and if you dont respond it times out and closes it
but you can always just opena enw one
yeah its the same as the last one, which was correcct
Okay thank you
I will now close the channel and continue tomorrow
Thanks for the help so far
.close
Closed by @raw gull
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
goodluck!
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help
the annoying thing is to write it in the for off cospbq
it is cosine law bro but the form
wait lemme go beyond ultra plus\
ok
@rain pollen Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @rain pollen
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone explain how to do this question i don't understand the solution
Which part do you not understand?
why can't x not equal x^-1
i can think of groups where some of the elements are it's own inverses
<@&286206848099549185>
Then multiplying both sides by x would imply n = 2 and contradict n is odd
@odd breach Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
My reasoning (I eventually got stuck trying to find the root of the discriminate)
since m is complex to
$m^2+4mi-4=(m+2i)^2$
Bonk
i think you know how to carry on from here
Wait so can I just cancel out the power?
wdym?
Without solving the system
you know the determinant is m^2+4mi-4 right?
well, m^2+4mi-4=(m+2i)^2
thus sqrt(determinant)=m+2i
but you can't just square root a complex?
what does it say in your book
i mean, you technically get a second solution
Well in theory, this should be equal to 0?
Unless I messed up mid way
no
im not sure what youre trying to say
you said sqrt(determinant)=m+2i
I found first solution
Then replaced it in said equation and didn't get 0
(Unless I made a mistake)
what do you have for z1?
$z_1=\frac{-(3m-2i)+(m+2i)}{2}=\frac{-2m+4i}{2}=-m+2i$
Bonk
should be the first root
$z_2=\frac{-(3m-2i)-(m+2i)}{2}=\frac{-4m}{2}=-2m$
Bonk
wait no
did you do $z_{1,2}=\frac{-b\pm\sqrt{\Delta}}{2a}$?
Bonk
Bonk
Bonk
is the second root
$(m-2i)^2-(3m-2i)(m-2i)+2m^2-4mi=m^2-4mi-4-3m^2+2m+6mi+4+2m^2-4mi$
Bonk
$-(-2i)(-2i)=-(4i^2)=-(-4)=4$
Bonk
happens 😄
yeah it does equal to 0 lol
both actually
this was book's methode
Of finding a complex determinant
root*
Anyways thank you so much for giving me some time/aid
🙏
Closed by @mental holly
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
if youre not used to complex numbers its easy to write off
since with real numbers thats nto possible
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi there. I'm relatively new to calculus, I'm trying to learn how to do problems involving exponential growth and decay. There's a general way to show how the change of the variable (mass, population, etc) over time is proportional to the derivative of that (the rate of change of that variable), and derive the equation. But there's a step which involves integrating both sides that I'm not wrapping my head around.
Q: Why are we allowed to integrate each side with respect to different things? It seems like we end up needing to integrate the left side with respect to P, and the right side with respect to t (in my setup). Why is that allowed?
you're looking for this (the variable names are different, but the idea is the same)
YES! Ok so my question becomes, why does integration by substitution work. So i guess i have to follow the link here
oh which is U sub
which is next on my list of things to learn lol
If the justification is using u sub, then I think I know what direction to head in now
so ill close it, but thanks a lot Pigeon 🙏
.close
Closed by @blazing dew
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Okay, I have a problem. I’m trying to figure out, the growth percent to make 62.5 into 9 million over 100 multiplications of 62.5 times X where X equals the growth percent
Basically exponential growth but i already have the time, final value and initial value, but not the growth function
So like 62.5x^100 = 9000000?
Yeah
Assuming 62.5x is 62.5 times X and that’s just not shown for simplifying reasons
yes
so the growth percent would just be (growth factor -1) * 100
the growth factor here being x
we want to first get rid of the 62.5 that's being multiplied to the x^100 before moving on to getting rid of that ^100 by square rooting on both sides
you have the right idea, just a little too soon in the solving process
please lmk if that makes sense
62.5 is being multiplied
Yeah
so do the opposite of multiplication
So we divide 9 million by 62.5
yes
yep
How do you square root and remove ^100
you do the one hundreth root on both sides
like y'know how roots sometimes have numbers
i'm explaining this really badly
give me a sec
$\sqrt[100]{144000}$
Planet
yeah
but you can round the growth factor
to like the thousandths
depends on if the exercise specifies
or not
but generally you don't need to put all the decimals the calculator gives you
so
if i input this into an exponential growth equation
it should equal 9 million
yes
look up desmos graphing calculator
but if you want to input it into a scientific calculator you can
you can just do
62.5(1.126117286)^100
and it should give 9 mil
thanks so much
@tranquil reef Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @tranquil reef
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Just need some quick clarification, does the 0.1912 mean 0.1912 percent or 19.12 percent? The video example said 0.1912 percent, but should it not be 19.12% (as I wrote down)?
,rotate
0.1912 means 19.12%, you are correct
Closed by @silver ibex
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Does the standard form of quadratic tell you the y intercept the factored form tell you the x intercepts and the vertex form tells you the vertex?
yes
And in the factored form it says x-r and x-r , is the r itself the x intercepts or the -r?
x intercept —> y = 0 hence at least one of the factors is zero, if one of the factors is x-r then x-r = 0 hence x = r
is an x intercept
Ok an lets say the x intercepts is negative hence its x+r does that mean its still just r?
Ah ok thx
@sly fern Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @sly fern
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i need help with graphing x & y intercepts and angles
so how can i graph x on a line plot
like how
!original
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
with like y intercepting without like uhm graphing backwards or upside down.
are we talking abt a particular question or like as a general
as in general
so just graphing a function
yeah. i'm a bit slow and don't understand what my teacher been teaching me.
..
firstly take the terms dependent on x to one side of the equation
it should be like y=f(x)
and there should be no x on the left hand side
thank you sm my teacher talks a bit fast and is very confusing
i havent even done anything yet
theres more. its going to be long isn't it.
not that long
alright
after this
take any value you like for x
usually we take something in between -5 and 5
but it depends on the function
mhm.
the functions are usually given in particular types
like a linear
or a quadratic
and so on
each function tupe has a characteristic graph
*type
dude reply
.
you need to know abt some of these types
to be more efficient
but its optional
okay
firstly linear
it will be simplified to y=mx+c
this will give a straight line
the original may be given as Ax+By+C=0
alright
here, m is known as the slope and c as the y-intercept
slope is nothing but the (change in y)/(change in x)
and the y-intercept is the value of y when x is zero
okay
next is quadratic
it will be simplified to y=ax^2+bx+c
it will give a parabola
a u-shaped curve which may open upward or downward
depending on the value of a
mhm
if a>0
then it will be an upward parabola
and will have a minima at x=-b/2a
and if a<0 it will be a downward parabola with a maxima at x=-b/2a
okay
.
you need only linear
or do you want other types too
no thank you i haven't gotten to that yet actually.
now we just moved onto supplementary, vertical and adjacent stuff.
what grade
7th advanced math
do you understand till here
mhm
okay
okay
mhm
the points where it intersects the x and y axes are known as intercepts
if x=0 then y-intercept
and if y=0 then x-intercept
i did 15 & 5 and gotten a straight line. thank you
.close
Closed by @coral salmon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i dont understand whats wrong on the increasing
you want open parentheses not square brackets for the first one
and you used y coordinates instead of x coords for the second
why did the video i watch tell me to use brackets TT
what video
👉 Learn how to determine increasing/decreasing intervals. There are many ways in which we can determine whether a function is increasing or decreasing but we will focus on determining increasing/decreasing from the graph of the function. A function is increasing when the graph of the function rises from left to right and is decreasing when the g...
no idea
on this is concave meaning the same as the earlier problem?
explain your reasoning
idk i just followed the video my teacher gave
the whole red curve is concave up, the whole blue curve is concave down
use those for reference
where am i supposed to stop the points?
try determining when the slope starts/stops decreasing
look up some vids on concavity
a ruler may help
have it tangent to the curve, follow along,
see when you change from rotating the ruler between clockwise and anti-clockwise
yes
(-inf,-3) would be the interval for concave down
i don't know where the others are coming from
Do you know what "concave" means?
i havent touched those
yes idk why it doesnt use convex
its mega confusing
concave up and down is just dumb TT
Well, things can be difficult sometimes.
why cant it just use convex and concave TT
I've a feeling mathematicians don't want to use seperate terms for it.
Or something, I dunno.
up and down to describe a word that already exists is just weird
is it -3,inf for concave?
(-inf,-3) would be the interval for concave down
(-3, ∞) is concave up.
yeah sorry thats what i was asking
I think.
is there another thing i need to put it says its wrong
show what yu're putting
Try (-5, ∞).
Closed by @obsidian crest
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i know if the upper bound for x is 1 and lower bound is 2y^2+2z^2-5 and not otherwise
because the set 1 > 2y^2 + 2z^2 - 5 is bounded
the set 1 < 2y^2 + 2z^2 - 5 is not
so only one of these are you actually integrating over a region with finite volume
If you take the xz and xy traces you'll find that this function is a paraboloid
And you know that because of the 5 that it has shifted 5 negatively on the x axis
So it starts at -5 on the x and opens from there towards positive infinity
@lusty lotus Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone help with these two questions
@deft estuary Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@deft estuary Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
hu
hi
look
first grid prob 3x3 grid: can the cat and dog have the same list of products??
5x5 & 11x11 Grids: similar question for larger grids
ok
polynomial expansion (i) even/odd coefficients when is Cn(i, j, k) even or odd?
(ii) sum of coefficient whats the sum of the coefficients where i, j, k > 0 ??
Sure lookGrid 3x3 grid ur asked if its possible to arrange the numbers 1-9 in such a way that the products of the numbers in the rows for the cat match the products in the columns for the dog
grid 3x3*
the key idea is that the arrange of numbers in rows and columns cant be made to match in product
so the answer is a no
now 5x5 and 11x11 grids
this extends the same idea to larger grids
the row and column products still cant match for these larger grids so the answer is no too
If u dont understand anything react with an X to the message
Can u explain this?
and this part of the q
Can you find any conditions on n that guarantee that it is possible or any conditions
that guarantee that it is impossible for the monkey to write the numbers 1, 2, . . . , n2
in an
n × n grid so that the cat and the dog obtain the same lists of numbers?
ye look small grids like n = 1 or n = 2 ite possible to arrange the numbs so that the row cat’s list match the column products dog s list
n for grids n ≥ 3it's impossib to arrange the numbers in such a way that the row products match the column products
due to the interdependencies between rows and columns so n = 1 or n = 2 works but for n ≥ 3 it doesnt
could you explain whats meant by interdependencies
tysm kareem
so I'm not getting exactly how to prove why when n>=3 its impossible
yw!!
wait lemme tell u
it refer to the fact that the arrangement of numbers in the rows nd columns of the grid
that isnt independent the choice of numbers in one row affects the numbers in the columns and vice versa
for n ≥ 3 its impossible cause the number of interdependencies between rows and columns increases
the arrangement of numbers in one row affects the columns nd as the grid size grows these interactions create too many conflicting constraints
yw ! + sure!
we alr know that for n ≥ 3 its impossible for the row and column products to match due to the interdependencies
and for n = 1 and n = 2 its possible as the constraints are fewer and we can arrange the numbers to satisfy both the row and column product comditions
n = 1 or n = 2 is possible because the number of constraints is small and we can arrange the numbers so the row and column products
but for n ≥ 3 its impossible cause the number of interdependencies grows
and the constraints on rows and columns cant be satisfied simultaneously conclusion :possible when n = 1 or n = 2 impossible when n ≥ 3
if u dont understand it tell me
yw!!!:)
ofc!
lemme check it one sec
when u expand (x + y + z)^n the terms involve multinomial coefficients and these coefficients depend on the values of n and the exponents i j k
the goal is to determine when these coefficients are even or odd
whichs influenced by the factorials in the multinomial formula and how the exponents interact with the number n
now secondly the sum of coefficients where i j k > 0 represents the number of ways to distribute
the total exponent n among three variables with the condition that each variable get a positive integer value
gets*
the total expinent n among three variables wit the condition that each variable gets a positive integer value
exponent
u get it?
one sec
Alr
What;s the expression in 6(ii)?
also@olive gust are you fine if I dm you a couple more questions in around 30 more mins?
i'm solving a worksheet rn and I may have more questions/doubts
ohh right thank you
yea i see it now, thank you
@deft estuary Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @deft estuary
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help me with understanding how the coeff of x^n in (1-x)^-r is n+r-1Cr-1
Do you know binomial theorem
yep
dunno how to visualize for negative index
(1-x)^-r
Derivation in the probability mass function section
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_binomial_distribution
In probability theory and statistics, the negative binomial distribution is a discrete probability distribution that models the number of failures in a sequence of independent and identically distributed Bernoulli trials before a specified/constant/fixed number of successes
r
{\displaystyle r}
occur. F...
😭 I was trying to understand with stars and bars
@meager quiver Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @meager quiver
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone give me the solution to this integral? My solution is Zero B), but in the solutions they are saying its C) They can be wrong, i already got some solution wrong in this document..
!show
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
this looks perfect for a u-sub
In fact they suggested a t-sub!
well i did 2 subs
They've already mentioned subbing lnx = t
i got zero, but the solutions is saying its b)
can someone confirm wich one is ?
yup, mb
mb
Mb
,w Integrate[sqrt(sin(pi * ln(x)/2))/(x * sec(pi * ln(x)/2)), {x,1,e}]
did you use the suggested substitution?
im seeing a theta
not the suggested sub
yes
on the right
the theta is just to now write all the stuff inside sin
like 1/2 * Pi * ln(x)
Did you change the bounds when you substituted, doesn't seem like you did
the bounds? the e and 1 ?
yes that i dd
no, that is just to not write all the stuff
anti-algebraist 𝔸dωn𝓲²s
it is necessary when you perform a substitution
unless you resubstitute back but most students forget that part anyway
so it's good habit to do so
ohhhh
so when x = e and after the sub (ln(x) = t) x = e^t
the upper bound is ln(e) (normal upper bound) = 1 ?
i mean, in the line before the last, you can seee i kinda did that...
when (3/2) is to the power...
Arya
Can you make sense of this antoniocantomoniz
yes yes
im so stupid
i got it right
in the last thing in the line before last
i got something times zero
:/
oh lol yea
so changes to ( 4 / 3Pi ) - 0
damm
lol thanks anyway guys
how do i close this?
type .solved
.solved
Closed by @static parcel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
The 1 question). G= … determine the function G, knowing that g(0) = 0
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
1 i dont know where to begin
ok
Je switch en français si t'es plus à l'aise avec
Théorème fondamental de l'analyse?
Ah merci
Est-ce que tu as vu ce th
Les équation différentielle d’ordre 1 je crois
Oui jai deja vu mais je nai rien compris des formules à utiliser
bon bah
ta fonction g' elle est bien continue
si on applique le TFA:
$\int_a^x g'(t)dt = g(x) - g(a)$
rafilou is not not born in 2003
Bon bah maintenant suffit de choisir une valeur de a qui nous arrange...
Donc 0
i got, g(t) = ln ( ( (t^2) + 3 ) / 3 )
just do the integral, then substitute t=0 in that
and you get C (the const)
then get the result of that integral and add the value you just got from C
yes, it's about integrating g' between 0 and t (or x)
But i dont undersatand when he need C, the question is determine the functiun G
En fait il a procédé d'une autre manière
il a trouvé une primitive de g'
(en intégrant)
Mon problème, c'est que je ne comprends pas comment on est passé de la fonction G'T à celle que tu m'as donnée.
tu comprends ça au moins?
c'est le TFA
Ba je comprend pas dou il provient
théorème fondamental de l'analyse
En mathématiques, le théorème fondamental de l'analyse (ou théorème fondamental du calcul différentiel et intégral) établit que les deux opérations de base de l'analyse, la dérivation et l'intégration, sont, dans une certaine mesure, réciproques l'une de l'autre. Il est constitué de deux familles d'énoncés (plus ou moins généraux selon les versi...
et pourtant tu as vu les équations diff d'ordre 1
bizarre
(et même d'ordre 2 juste en dessous)
bon
du coup comment on fait dans ton cours
pour calculer les solutions de y' + a(x)y = b(x)
Ou alors je nai aps compris mon cours mais je ne vois pas ce théorème en tout cas pas le nom
Tu n'as jamais vu un théorème qui fait le lien entre dérivée et intégrale ?
Aucun ?
ok, mais je parle pas d'équa diff
