#help-13
1 messages · Page 367 of 1
It seems like the supremum of B is some number between b and a
I don't know what I'm doing but did I do something right here atleast
I don't know if I can solve this problem, been on this thread for 2 hours already
@green crow Has your question been resolved?
i gave u a proof
since $B = {b : b , \text{is a lower bound of} , A }$
hiidostuff
that means that $\forall a \in A$ and $\forall b \in B$, $b \leq a$
hiidostuff
now we show that sup(B) is in B
If supB is in B then would that mean supB≤a
let $\Phi$ represent sup B and and $\Psi$ represent inf A
hiidostuff
now we choose an arbitrary $\epsilon > 0$. Since $\Phi$ is the LUB of B, it follows that $\Phi - \epsilon$ is not an upper bound of B, and so, there exists an x in B such that $\Phi - \epsilon < x$
hiidostuff
I haven't seen that definition yet
i mean if Phi is the least upper bound
then any number less than phi is not an upper bound
which means theres an element of the set that is greater than that number less than phi
ok continuing the proof
Since $x \in B$, we know x is a lower bound of A (since thats how B is defined). Since $\Psi$ is the greatest lower bound of A, it follows that $x \leq \Psi$.
hiidostuff
By transitivity we then know that $\Phi - \epsilon \leq \Psi$
hiidostuff
and since epsilon can get arbitrarily close to 0, it follows that $\Phi \leq \Psi$
hiidostuff
I don't understand phi- epsilon is not an upper bound of B
from this inequality tho
we know that the sup B is less than the greatest lower bound of A
meaning that sup B is a lower bound of A so sup B is indeed in B
If epsilon greater than zero then phi-epsilon > phi?
no
its less than phi
btw, which college course are you taking that this is one of the first times ur exposed to proofs?
this seems pretty complicated for someone being introduced to proofs
I'm not taking a course, I'm trying to learn on my own
i see
i definitely wouldnt start with real analysis
if ur new to proofs then this is above ur paygrade at this moment in my opinion
i myself didnt start with this stuff
i did proofs like "Prove that if n is odd then n^2 is odd"
People from math discussion said real analysis is a good place to start
nah id start with discrete
then move to real
What proofs are there for discrete
The only proof I understood was proving square root of 2 is irrational from analysis textbook
yeah thats discrete id say
ill give some examples
could u prove directly that if n is odd then n^2 is odd?
i think ive seen that proof before
yep
then theres contradiction proofs
like the sqrt(2) one
contraposition as well
What other proof do I need to know or would be a good exercise
i dont know any proofs textbooks by memory
but i would imagine you could look some up
thought to be honest, discrete math proofs are pretty different from analytic ones
you have to be a lot more comfortable with arbitrary differences like less than vs less or equal
@green crow Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
in the 2, 3 and 4th examples when integrating
why is the number factored out of the integral -2/3, 2/9 and -1/3
shouldn’t it be 2/3 because of the 1/(a+1) rule
The inside of the square root has a negative x
So by what is basically the inverse chain rule
We gotta remember to multiply by a negative
what’s that?
okok
can we just do for the last one for example
Sure
(1-2u)^1/2
integrating that we get 2/3(1-2u)^3/2
We dont get that
why not tho?
t^1/2
But we need to change du to dt
oh yeah
So for t = 1-2u
so dt = -2 du
Differentiate both sides with respect to their own variables
Yep
Which means -1/2 dt = du
yep
And we can plug in now
We also have to change the bounds with respect to t
Initially we had $\int_{-1}^{0} \sqrt{1-2u} \dd u$
hiidostuff
how Do we do that
yes
Well the -1 on the bottom means u = -1 there
An then t+1
And then for the top we get 1 when we plug in 0 for u
how do we know that
So changing it to a t integral
Because the integral is with respect to u
oh yeah
so it’s equal to -1 and 0 ig?
ohhhh
okok I get it now
Mhm
but the solution skipped allat
And then changing to t we get the integral from 3 to 1
We will come back to it
so there’s a quicker way or no?
But now we have $\int_3^1 -\frac12 \sqrt{t} , \dd t$
hiidostuff
yep
So let's integrate this
let’s take -1/2 out
Yep
we get 2/3(t)^3/2
So we get -1/3
okhhh
And now we can change everything from t back to u
yep
So $-\frac13 \sqrt{t} = -\frac13 \sqrt{1-2u}$
hiidostuff
And even tho we changed the bounds earlier
We can keep em the same now that we switched back to u
Does it make sense why we can just directly integrate this
Yes, if the inside of the square root is a linear function
Divide the integral by the derivative of the linear function
hiidostuff
Take the derivative of 4-3x
Yep
so it’s -1/3
Now integrate as if you were ignoring the inside
The inside of the square root i mean
-1/3(2/3(4-3x)^3/2)
Mhm
so -2/9
Sure
I see
We basically want to multiply the weird square root stuff by some additive conjugate
In order to get the difference of squares
how do we get sqrt(x-1)-sqrt(x) in the second step
Well
Do u agree that $(\sqrt{x} + \sqrt{x+1})(\sqrt{x} - \sqrt{x+1}) = x - (x+1) = -1$
hiidostuff
yes
We basically want to get rid of the square roots in the denominator
And instead have them in the numerator
Sure
in the second one
It's the same thing happening in the second one
how they take out the 1/5
Well think about what they are multiplying in the denominator
ohh yeah
They're canceling the square roots to get a constant
yes
Hope i was able to help
Intro calculus can be a pretty boring and rule-filled part of math so sorry if this stuff is hurting your brain
Id just ask here again as I won't be online at this time very often
I live in the USA
lol yep
If i end up helping u again tho, I'm curious what u want to study in uni
prolly med
If ur doing math then I should probably be a lot more rigorous with my explanation
oh wait one more thing
Ah nvm then
yeah
im only 14 as well I got plenty of time to master this shi
Truth
Tho calculus doesn't come up that often in med
0+1 = 1
They are subtracting that part after the parentheses
Yep
okok cool
They just associated everything when u plug 1 in
.close
Closed by @small barn
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
with taylor
Try getting the taylor series of each term first
@zinc depot Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how to integrate this?
by parts
how do you integrate e^x^2
that is the neat part, you don't just integrate that
what do you think is needed to be with that expression so you can integrate it
Hmm
yeah idk 😭
that would work too
don't you see that having an x multiplied by it would allow you to integrate it
im not sure how
yeah how do you use by parts completely
Well you need to define two functions
One to differentiate and one to integrate
its the form int of u dv = uv - int of vdu
Let u = x^2 and dv = xe^(x^2) dx
hmm
Ok start from the beginning, use u sub where u = x^2 so du = 2x
Closed by @dry mason
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, I am struggling with this question
As somebody whos currently trying to learn mathematics as a beginner I am trying to learn how to solve it from chatgpt but the AI's responses become more stupid as i ask harder questions
Actually, for this question i dont get what kind of 'union' or 'intersection' we are looking for. Can somebody at least give some ideas to how to approach? This is not my homework and im not trying to make you people solve any kind of assignments, this is just a sample test for my upcoming exam.
ok
so
you want the set of numbers that belongs to A_n for some natural n, in the first one
you want the set of numbers that belongs to A_n for all natural n, in the second one
you want the set of numbers that belongs to the conjugate of A_n for some n, in the third one (where by conjugate i mane belong to reals, but dont belong to An)
you want the set of numbers that belongs to B_n for all n, in the third one
you want the set of numbers that belongs to B_n for some n, in the fourth one
thanks for explaining, but for example how do we solve the first one?
ok
gpt made me realize that the A_n getting closer to 1, 5
and it says it is [1, 5] but when i asked why isnt it (1, 5) it said 'youre right' which was a random question..
yes listening 🙂
you are right
in this case
all number between 1 and 5 will be in some A_n, yes?
yes
and 1 and 5 will not be in A_n for any n, right?
like for any given numbers?
for any n, yes
yes
also all numbers smaller than 1 and greater than 5 will never be in A_n for any n, right?
yes
so 1 and 5 will never be in A_n in any case
that means there is no way to make this set have 1 and 5
sorry but what the hell are we looking for here
thats where im lost
ok (1, 5) makes sense but to some point
we are looking for the value which are in A_n for some n
generally i would be looking for some values that determines whether some equation is true or not
here it is
there exists n such that
1+1/n <= x <= 5 - 2/n
lets say the input is 6 then why is it wrong
because
sorry i know im asking stupid questions
not stupid
there is no natural number n, such that 1+1/n <= 6 <= 5-2/n
lets say
1+1/n <= 4 <= 5-2/n
and 4 satisfies it
where does the n come from?
if it isn't the input how do we assign any values to t
we do not assign values to it
but check if there exists a value of it which worls
in this case
yes
setting n = 2, allows this to work
as
(1+1/2<=4<=5-2/2) is a correct statement
right
we only look for all n work when doing intersection
when doing union we check if any n work
so is it ok if i just dont care about the value of n and ignore it?
yes
you just need to be able to show if there is an n, not what the n is (tho in certain cases the simplest way to show there is an n, is to find the n)
(1+1/2<=4<=5-2/2)
this perfectly makes sense but where did the <= come from
because the initial thing doesnt have anything like that
the definition of the [1+1/n,5-2/n]
is that
[a,b] is the set of all values, x, such that a<=x<=b
so for the second one does it apply?
as in?
for Bn
oh alright
so [ means included, and here it means equal
when we have not included which is the paranthesis, it is not equal but only greater/lesser
when you said no i thought there is a whole different thing but at least this makes sense
hm
thanks for your help, i started to grasp the overall thing a little bit
then it is time to
.close
Closed by @normal dock
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
On a German motorway, black cars are four times more common than
cars of other colors. Most black cars are driven by men: 60% of men drive black cars, while 20% of women drive
cars of a different color. We observe the cars on the motorway. State the probabilities in percent, rounded to whole numbers.
What is the probability of observing a man driving a
black car?
What is the probability that the car is not black?
We see a black car. What is the probability of a woman driving it?
-
P(B|M)=P(B∩M)/P(B)
0,8*0,6/0,8=0,6 -
1/1-4/5=1/5
-
P(W|B)=P(W∩B)/P(B)
0,8*0,4/0,8=0,4
Can someone tell me if this is correct?
The is an x between 0.8 and 0.6 and between 0.8 and 0.4
@cedar kayak Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@cedar kayak Has your question been resolved?
@cedar kayak Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi so I have a question about mathematical induction regarding sequences.
No need to ask “Can I ask…?” or “Does anyone know about…?”—it’s faster for everyone if you just ask your question! See https://dontasktoask.com/
finding the screenshot
one second
I got to assume n = k + 1
But I don’t know how to manipulate it the same way as say a series
show all your work
I know you’re supposed to separate k from Uk+1, and then make it equal to the RHS but I don’t know how to do it
oh and d = 600
<@&286206848099549185>
@dire geode do you have any ideas?
factor out an r to get it to look like u_n
you'll add and subtract something to keep the fraction on the right the same
r^k -1 = r^k - r + r - 1
@obsidian dawn Has your question been resolved?
wait can u write this down?
wut
do you mean r^k-1 or r^k - 1
like on paper
riemann
this only applies to the numerator in the fraction
you were supposed to factor out an r first from both terms
wait how?
this is just u_1 * r^k
you factor and do algebra above until you get u_k
you can write u_k and work backwards to get u_k+1
@obsidian dawn Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
a direct ss might be better
oops its in arabic ill see if i can translate it
ok
You know that area of a ∆ is 1/2 base • height right?
Arya I didn't know you read arabic
The question asks you to write area of ∆s AA'C and AA'B in two ways (by using the perpendiculars h once, and next using "d" and the respective bases)
oh thx but those r not the questions that im working on i already solved it
For example, [AA'C] = 1/2 db = 1/2 A'C • h
Exercises 114 The center of the circle drawn inside a triangle is a point of convergence)) Prove that: The heights in a weighted triangle (AC BC) in terms of ARC KCB b Conclude that is the reference (Cumy) (tan) The center of the circle drawn inside this triangle and point C The height passing through point 8 intersects (AC) at 1 and the height passing through the point) intersects (AD) at M give similar results for naphthalene/f. The intersection of the heights in it and) the center of the circle surrounding the triangle. The goal of this problem is to find three real numbers such that or or (0) is a reference (C) (8.3) (α) is weighted to: d) Show that the point meets the heights in the weighted (C). ,tany) (B, tan) (A, taner) [AB] [AC] |BC| And the middle ones, respectively. (1) The center of the circle drawn inside the triangle bisector of the angle BAC intersects ACI at A son of A equal distance from the two parallels (AN) and (AC). It is symbolized by the fact that the axes of the triangle ABC are at altitudes to this distance B. The length of the height passing through the point... in triangle MN b through n from 10 as a weight to 0 and. A Use the result (1) d). The product that 0 is the center of the circle surrounding the triangle ABC is a reference A and C are attached to coefficients that are requested to be set. (this is what i got when i translated it but im sure its not 100/100 accurate)
i did it
=_= which part do you need help with, specifically
Alr
Me neither (@_@;)
Anyways, @fluid pawn for the first part you need to show that perpendicular bisectors of the midpoints of ∆ABC are altitudes for the medial triangle
Which is trivial because, by midpoint theorem PN || BC and so perpendicular bisector of BC is basically a perpendicular drawn from midpoint M of BC onto PN.
Similarly for others
ahh yes thank u
If you can explain what you did for part 1d) I can help you with 2b). But 2c) is basically asking for you prove that the intersection of these altitudes of the medial triangle MNP or quite simply the intersection of the perpendicular bisectors of ABC is the circumcenter
That is, distance from this point to any other vertex would be equal
i still havent done part 1d but i solved a similar question in this same exo and this is what i did: i wrote them as vectors then used علاقة شال and kept putting in the points that i needed till i got it
@fluid pawn Has your question been resolved?
u know what imma ask a teacher. thank you for your work really appreciate it @fallen heath
.close
Okie.
.close
Closed by @fluid pawn
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Show your work
I don't see why you set 5x-4 equal to 2x+56
why would it be equal to 180?
What's equal to 180
a supplementary line
I don't see a supplementary line
You should be using isosceles triangle properties
And the sum of angles in a triangle adds up to 180 deg
These are only two of the three angles in the triangle
Do you see the isosceles triangle?
yeah
You're given two of the three angles
so there's 2 of the 5x-4's?
@latent jewel Has your question been resolved?
@latent jewel Has your question been resolved?
@latent jewel Has your question been resolved?
@latent jewel Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can some1 help
what are "these"?
Can you factorise 6 - 1 for me? Assume a³ = 6, b³ = 1
I dont even know how to
@untold egret Has your question been resolved?
(6(1/3) -1)*(36(1/3) +6(1/3) +1)
the (1/3) is power of 1/3
Yeah, so 7/(³√36 + ³√6 + 1) = 7/5 * (³√6 - 1)
@untold egret Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @untold egret
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i need help with finding the x and y intercepts and the hole for this function
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
What's unclear?
i plugged zero in for the x's this equation to find the x and y intercepts, this is what i got
This is the y-intercept, yes
so the y is -1?
okay
im confused on how i should find the x intercept
if my notes say i should plug in zeros..?
or do i set it to zero
What properties does the graph have at a x intercept/how does it looks like graphically?
it passes through the x-axis(?)
The x-axis has the equation y = 0 (or if you'd like, g(x) = 0)
so i would set it like this?
because i thought that was my vertical
asymptote
ohhh vertical is set the denominator to zero(?)
Yes
In this example, the vertical line at the origin (x = 0) is a vertical asymptote; the function has a hole there
im unsure about this because my graph doesnt pass 16
x^2 is not your graph
Your graph is (-4x + 16)/(x^2 - 16)
square root 16?
okay one second
Well, you want to find all $x$ that satisfy $x^2 = 16$
Kepe
do i set that equation to zero?
4
and?
im not sure
-4
oh
Ok, now you got x = 4 and x = -4 as your vertical asymptotes
But remember that at x = 4, you said there is also a zero?
so thats a hole?
If this happens and the multiplicities in the numerator and denominator for the zero match, it will be a removable discontinuity
That's what you call hole, I assume
i believe so
so there is no x intercept
?
because setting the numerator to zero gave me 4
and my vertical is also at 4?
In a case like this, you will be able to simplify your function f(x) because you can factor out (x - zero) from both numerator and denominator
so one of them cant be graphed
$f(x) = \frac{-4x + 16}{x^2 - 16} = \frac{-4(x - 4)}{(x+4)(x-4)} = \frac{-4\cancel{(x - 4)}}{(x+4)\cancel{(x-4)}} = \frac{-4}{x + 4}$ for $x \neq 4$!!
Kepe
ohhh factoring it first
Yes, if something is a zero of both numerator and denominator, you can always do this
ohh so there is so x
Because you can factor out zeros
int
So your graph will look like the graph of $\frac{-4}{x + 4}$, just that at $x = 4$, you will have a hole (you draw it with a little circle)
Kepe
does this look right?
the horizontal at 0, hole at 4 and y intercept at -1?
no x int or vertical
Didn't we have a x int?
Ah, nope
We had only one value for the x intercept, 4
The +4 and -4 was for the vertical asymptotes (out of which 4 falls away and becomes a hole)
ohh so the vertical can still sit on -4?
(remember to check the y coordinate of the hole)
There is still one vertical asymptote at x = -4, yes
for this i would have to plug f(4)?
in the simplified form
Looks good
@narrow scaffold Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @narrow scaffold
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello
cos y
We say an ODE is linear if there's a nonconstant function multiplied to y
That just means it's inhomogeneous
What's a nonconstant function?
In general, a linear ODE is of the form ay'+by=f(x) where a and b are strictly constants
There exists functions a(x)y'+b(x)y=f(x) that are first order
Are constants the same as parameters?
isn't f(x) y + y' = 0 also linear
cos(y) doesnt seem like a legitimate part of f(x) to me
I think this is right too
yes
yes in a way
"A DE that contains no products of terms involving the dependent variable(s) is called linear"
What does products of term mean
Dependent variables can't be multiplied with independent variables?
only dependent variables matter
maybe a more rigorous definition is there exists a function L such that the DE can be written as
L(x, y, y', ...) = 0
where L is linear in every argument except the first
can someone tell me how to solve it to
you can have x*y and still be linear
So in conclusion, in the first equation, x is the variable that makes the equation non-linear?
What
So why is the first equation non-linear?
y = dependant variable
cos(y)
What's wrong about that
cos(y1 + y2) != cos(y1) + cos(y2)
^
cos is a non-linear function
Closed by @versed fulcrum
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
This is a dumb question, but i have a 150ft rope and need to figure out the distance between 2 green lines, I'm not sure how id do that. the red line is the rope. (this is in a game, im debating someone on something.)
not enough information here to say really
Hm ok.. what info would you need?
I mean, its possible i think.
still more info would be appreciated
What kind of info do you need?
you could probably get a reasonable-ish guess, if you measure the screen and convert the scale using the rope, i doubt you need anything that specific
itll be off though
Wouldnt it be less then 150ft? the bottom line (the red one) is 150ft, the green lines are inside of that.
Alright, ill try this. i dont need to be exact tbf.
I should be abel to get it from here, thank you guys.
.close
Closed by @spark palm
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How to do 3(g-f)(3)
this
nah it's ok
Cuz (g -f) is the same as g() - f()
Closed by @autumn moss
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
u can do it
measure rope through your screen and like create a scale .. then measure the distance between and then convert to rope...\
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm struggling to find the r of the geometric sequence
,rccw
write everything in the form you have below
This form?
the a1*r^(n-1)
Well that's the part I'm stuck at
he meant like a2 term write it as
a2=a1 r^2-1
and for the other terms
is the answer 36 power 1/3
I don't know the answer
oh well
i assumed a2 to be ar^2 a3 to be ar^-1 a4 to be ar and a5 to be ar^2
then put in the equation and a gets cancelled
hi
Hi
do u get it
No
just assume
a get cancelled
cuz both numerator and denominator will have a in their terms
try it , it will get cubic if u use standard terms
,w (x^3 + x^2) / (x+1) = 36
it will be 36 to power 1/2
I think I kinda get it but don't understand this part
a canceled out
I might be missing something
factor an r^2 out of the denominator
Closed by @turbid pond
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone explain me how the 3_
x'2 goes out
what do you mean by "goes out"?
i know the answer but i dont know how 3_
x'2 becomes 6x-3
like how does it transform
you may use 3/x^2, by the way
I don't know what the question is 
can you show the context?
türk müsün
türküm
right, okay
türkçe sor
That's a new way to write fractions 
ya bu
$\frac{3}{x^2}$
SWR
bu nasıl 6x'-3 diye çıkıyo
you need to use the power rule to differentiate this
yani
,, \frac{3}{x^2} = 3x^{-2}
ourfallenstars
bunda üssü bir azaltıp başa düşürcen
now, apply the power rule $\frac{d}{dx} x^n = nx^{n - 1}$
ourfallenstars
evet şeyi biliyorum türevi
bi dk
3/2x oldu
dimi
başa attık
$-2 \cdot 3 \cdot x^{-3}$ oldu
haygiya
:D
$x^5$ türevini alsan $5x^4$ olmuyo mu
haygiya
$4x^7$ türevini alsan $28x^3$ olmuyo mu
haygiya
e o zaman
3/2x
üssü de bi azalcak gene
bu olcak
haygiya
eevet
$1/x^2$ olunca $x^{-2}$ vs.
haygiya
3/x2 olunca 3x'-2 oluyo
aynen
.close
Closed by @exotic laurel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
@hollow kiln
burda ne diyo
e üzeri y türev
eşittir
y türev çarpı e üzeri y mi
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone explain me
yes
product rule
lny= x.lnx
So they differentiate both sides
like
On the left, you get the chain rule
im really bad at math
On the right, you get the product rule
i dont know the rules names but i know the things but
No you got it
can u just explain to me how (x.lnx)' becomes 1.lnx + x.1/x
$can u just explain to me how (x.lnx)' becomes 1.lnx + x.1/x$
SirKuzey
,tex .diff rules
x = f(x)
ik this
then follow the right side
OHHHHHHH
what happend here
y'/y then y is gone
,tex .diff rules
SirKuzey
A brief description and guide on how to use me was sent to your DMs!
Please use ,list to see a list of all my commands, and ,help cmd to get detailed help on a command!
yeah but explain incase
no you
. it with y
subtitute means
what
like
.
?
use this to replace y
y'/x'x = 1.lnx + x.1/x
y'/x'x = 1.lnx + x.1/x is this corect
yes
yes
okay how does
1.lnx + x.1/x becomes x'x (lnx+1)
with .x'x
like
i cant do the . problem
@exotic laurel Has your question been resolved?
,help
A brief description and guide on how to use me was sent to your DMs!
Please use ,list to see a list of all my commands, and ,help cmd to get detailed help on a command!
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
In the graph shown, MP is the mediatrix of BC.
If AP=CD=3 and m ABM=82°, calculate BC
pretty
why what? I was just saying that the line work and handwriting is pretty
ohh okay, that's great, thx
I thought it was pretty bc you found something haha
que significa "mediatriz" en ingles?
ah
I have to put that
"perpendicular bisector"
You can use law of sines for this triangle
right
even tho it's not included on the topics of this exercise, I'll use it
wild. There might be a smarter way but I do not see one yet
i'm supposed to use congruent triangles, this is the topic, it's normally tricky, at least for me
idk if I should do that, the segment above is 24/7 and the right one is 15√2 / 7
@crimson sedge Has your question been resolved?
@crimson sedge you mixed up your k and 7k lengths
yeah, I fixed it right after
I noticed
I'll send it
again
why -24/7?
yes
ohh okay, i'll do it
is k 1
idk
the problem is that I can't directly put it in a calculator to verify
if k = 1 then the answer is 5√2
but idk
yes
thank you very much, it was interesting
you need to find an exact answer to sin(82) then
It's not exactly 1
mm
it could be 24/49
you'll have to redo most of your calculations
It's not
Just leave it in terms of sin(82) or cos(82)
there's no exact answer
mm but then maybe it wouldn't be in the options?
Oh right, it's multiple choice. That's unfortunate because that is not an exact answer
yeah, maybe I just need to approximate
$5\sqrt{2}$ is the closest, but not exact
SWR
Maybe. But the problem never said that. It's extremely misleading
How did you even get 7k here btw?
f of x =3 to the power of x\
@crimson sedge Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I dont understand the question
what about it confuses you?
@robust adder Has your question been resolved?
Parallel to the y-axis
thats a vertical line
they have the form x=a where a is some constant
a horizontal line has the form y=a where a is again some constant
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
shouldn't this be (x-10)(x+2) or am i wrong?
yea idk why they wrote that on the right when they wrote the correct thing at the bottom