#help-13
1 messages · Page 363 of 1
thats complicated wait a min
i think so yea
but the parallelogram argument is basically additional
unless theres some easier way to prove it
yea
So P' M' and D are less weird
yep
honestly i think one way or another we gonna prove this
just a matter of making it least complicated
Yes
like using parallelograms to simplify the probelm
Yes
yea so i think i can sleep now
seeing as the problem is not that important
cuz we def can solve it if we want
?
nah i just meant then i think i dont need to solve this question anymore, seeing as we can def solve it if we want
just a matter of chasing angles n stuff
Maybe
hmm i posted on mathstack tho
Ok
I was thinking we could do something like
Line connecting OB+OE and OA+OC
No that is complicated
yep the parallelogram arg is false tho
I got it
Let P' be the midpoint of AC
it does cross through D, but how does this help with proving MNP is collinear
diagram to accompany 💀
We can shrink everything by a factor of 2
this is homethety?
Yes
can you give the full proof then
noice
Let P' be the midpoint of AC ig MP' bisected OD we are done, right?
yes
u can just use MP tho
So if I prove DP' is parallel to OM I am done, right?
yess
Let DP' meet BE at K, if BKD = 90, I am done, right?
Yes
All we have left to show is that distance from M to OD is distance from P' to OD
But just parralel is not enough
how does this imply its parallel wait a min
EBC+ACB=90
ahh so we end up with the same kind of stuff
But in this case it is simple
Since AOP' = AOC/2 = (180-BOE)/2 = 90 - BOM
We have OM = AP' = DP'
AOP=AOC/2?
Meant AOP'
nah still how
P' is midpoint of AC
also this how?
AOC is isosceles
this?
as in distance of M and P from DO is the same right?
Yes
Basic angle chase
nvm i got it
all right then its easier to use MP to prove cuz DO is weird right?
yea
actually the original original question is this
yep phantom points
Yep
so like in original context we just phantom the N instead
LOL
@steel crest can i discuss geo by dm u in future? (i promise i wont bother u)
Sure
Closed by @ripe lance
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Prove that x = (y/2)
@worldly cradle Has your question been resolved?
@worldly cradle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello
Closed by @opaque root
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do you figure out all the roots (including imaginary) of a function with degree greater than 2? its easy for deg 1 and deg 2 has a formula, but theres no formula for deg 3+
but im talking about anything more than 2, what about 5, 6, 7, 13, 19, 243?
these provably don't have a general formula beginning at 5
only thing you can do is either guess a root
if you hit, then you can long divide by the linear factor and reduce the degree by 1
or you approximate all the zeroes
guess an imaginary root, things can get really crazy like that, it could be anything
there are polynomials where it's impossible to write down the zeroes using only elementary operations and roots
its easy to approximate real zeros, but complex zeros, no
like?
Finding polynomial roots is a long-standing problem that has been the object of much research throughout history. A testament to this is that up until the 19th century, algebra meant essentially theory of polynomial equations.
oh ty
In numerical analysis, the Weierstrass method or Durand–Kerner method, discovered by Karl Weierstrass in 1891 and rediscovered independently by Durand in 1960 and Kerner in 1966, is a root-finding algorithm for solving polynomial equations. In other words, the method can be used to solve numerically the equation
f(x) = 0,
where f is a given pol...
not that I ever tried these out
anything else
I don't think there is any satisfactory answer for this
Closed by @thin wagon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why do compressions happen when > 1 and stretches happen when < 1?
Idek if I said it right
But if it's like 1/2, it stretches but if its 2 it compresses
Like what is the algebra behind that?
Is that coefficent being multiplied to all x values?
@trail dune Has your question been resolved?
lets take your example
csc(x) and csc(4x)
take x=1
you get csc(1) and csc(4)
or generally for any function f(x)
and say f(4x)
if you take any value, say x=1
f(x) = f(1)
f(4x) = f(4)
f(4x) is a compresses version of f(x)
Yes bassically the x values of f(x) are increasing faster
Same as sinx vs sin4x
You divide the period by 4 with sin4x because they get more compact, since f(x) increases at a faster rate according to the x axis
@trail dune Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im slow or is there no viable correct answer for this
if we take the ratio of the corresponding sides that arent the same??
10/12 = 0.83333
6/4 = 1.5
Try drawing both diagrams, AB≠PS because of the order
so one gives 5/6 while the other gives 3/2
so is it 6/4 = 3/2
BC & QR
Yeah you got it
ok the last 2 final questions ill ask
exams in 15 mins
the one above is SAS similarity right?
Closed by @tight totem
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
A group of 10 people visited a bookstore. It is known that:
1. Each person bought exactly 3 books.
2. For every pair of individuals, there is at least one book that both have purchased.
What is the minimum number of people who could have bought the most-purchased book?
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
Ahhh?
as a "stupid" solution would be everybody gets the exact same 3 books
Yay
Yeah
okay lets see if we can work that out.
so it needs to be of the form
a b c
a ? ?
a ? ?
a ? ?
b ? ?
b ? ?
b ? ?
c ? ?
c ? ?
c ? ?
right?
because out of the remaining 9 people
they must share one book with person 1 at least
and only 3 other people can have a book which the person has
and since there are 3 books
this is the only option
yeah you are right it doesn't work out
think this assumption is wrong?
no??
there are 3 books in person#1's hand
okay lets see if 5 works
6 work, but how could I know every possible 5 don’t
ah i read what you said wrong sorry
huh this is hard
i feel like 5 should work
oh yay i got it
1 2 4
1 2 4
2 3 5
2 3 5
1 3 6
1 3 6
4 5 6
1 5 7
2 6 7
3 4 7
5 works
out of curiosity, where did you get this problem from
@cold timber
Thanks!
is this an aops problem or smth
do u do competition math
oh ok 👍
.close
Closed by @cold timber
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Thanks
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
guys can anyone exxplain to me what the direction ratios are im totally confused what are ratios and proportionality at this point.
if possible explain in the terms of a simple line and coordinates and numbers not along vectors
<@&286206848099549185>
!15min
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
Can you give an example?
its not a question
its a
i mean im trying to understand it
what direction ratios are
So the term "direction ratios" is not one I'm immediately familiar with. Based on the fact you're talking about vectors, I'm assuming the subject is linear algebra, which is a subject I consider myself quite familiar with, so it might be a case where it's a concept I know, but not by that name, hence I'm asking for an example or a definition
ahmm how do i explain actually from my books its not from vectors tho it is from coordinates in 3 dimensional space
I'm sorry, what you're asking is just not clear to me. Can you please explain what you do know about this topic and ask a specific question?
ok wait
I'm not trying to be a hard ass or anything, it's just that you seem to be assuming I understand the context
And I just don't, I'm not even sure what course you're taking.
Ok, so I'm googling around and I have the following:
yea please show me
The direction ratios refer to the coefficients of a vector given a particular basis.
So if we are using the basis i-hat, j-hat, and k-hat, then if v = i-hat + 3 j-hat - 2 k-hat then our direction ratios are (1, 3, -2)
hey stop stop
can u explain in terms of simple line tho
i dont wanna enter vectors
So, when you say a "simple line," do you mean a special sort of line that carries the name "simple" as in something like "rational" number, or are you using it colloquially?
If colloquially, can you give me an example line?
a simple line defined on a plane (x,y,z) having direction cosines l,m,n and direction ratios a,b,c. getting to know what direction ratios are would single handedly be a great thing because im staring at this paragraph for hours
from origin to a point p
op(x,y,x)
Ok, specifically a line which passes through the origin
yea
So if a simple line passes through a point such as (3, 4, 5) then (3, 4, 5) are the direction ratios. Also any multiple thereof. So (6, 8, 10) and (1.5, 2, 2.5) are also direction ratios for this line
Ah, they're kind of throwing you into this a little hard
@urban abyss do you understand direction cosines?
If not I'm happy to explain
Yes I understand direction cosines
So let's think about the line segment in terms of its length. Let's say it has length r from the origin to the destination point (x,y,z)
From the Pythagorean theorem, we know r = √(x^2 + y^2 + z^2)
And from the definition of direction cosines we know that rl = x, rm = y, rn = z
Yes
For what
For what?
Huh
Ok so
I'm still trying to figure out what your confusion is
But you're not exactly being helpful here...
My confusion is about what direction ratios are or ratios and proportionality in general
Because you're telling me you don't understand anything on that page, but when I take the time to explain the first part of that page, you're acting like you understood it this entire time?
Ok let's try another tactic maybe
2d lines have a slope
Ohh god this my habit, like I know things but regardless yea I knew those tho
This slope is a ratio of rise over run
Ok
Let's reframe though
Instead of rise over run, we instead use two values, rise over length and run over length
These are equivalent.
We just need two pieces of information to characterize the line
Yes that's rise over run
So this method, of rise over run has a problem in that it cannot describe vertical lines
Yea
Because that would involve dividing by zero
Tan 90
We want to describe any line, so we reframe to do rise over length and run over length instead
So we get 1 and 0 for rise over length and run over length respectively for vertical lines for instance.
Now note something if you would
These are cosines, they will have values between -1 and 1
And further for any pair of two, we will have that they lie on a unit circle
For instance, for a slope of 1, these will be 1/√2 and 1/√2
I'm doing a 2D case
To give you motivation why we do things like this for the 3d case
So what we have lost is a single value, but we have gained the following:
- The ability to describe any slope
- A way of viewing the pair of cosines as a pair of points on the unit circle
Wait but I'm not understanding circle thing here
Sure no biggie
Can u just explain what direction ratios and how that relation is derived and also how proportionality had to do with it
@urban abyss can you stfu and listen, ive been watching this conversation and you are being unhelpful af
Sorry
So if we draw a line that goes through the origin and a unit circle, this line will pass through the unit circle in two places
If we take one of these points, (x, y) and perform y/x we will recover the slope
You get the same slope no matter which of the two points you select (can you see why?)
So we can go from a line to a pair of points on the unit circle this way
We are doing it this way, because once we go into higher numbers of dimensions this new method generalizes better
For 3 dimensions we map a line onto a pair of points on the unit sphere.
And if you deal with 4, 5, etc dimensions then you would map the line onto a pair of points on the 3-sphere and 4-sphere respectively.
(the hypersphere is called a 3-sphere because the surface is 3 dimensional, just like the surface of a regular sphere is 2 dimensional)
Yooo I am feeling dumb
But the key take away is that it generalizes.
Which is why we have a shift of perspective
Don't feel like you have to immediately understand.
Continue
That's it, the generalization from 2d to 3d is just generalizing from a point on a circle to a point on a sphere.
The direction ratios go from 2 to 3
Imm process this all wait
@urban abyss Has your question been resolved?
processing
@urban abyss in that case be sure to click on the ❌
i think i got it some i can take things from here
thanks bro
You're very welcome
Use .close
Closed by @urban abyss
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm a bit unsure about the kerL basis. Can somebody tell me if my work is correct?
@pulsar sierra Has your question been resolved?
the kernel basis seems reasonable
i'm not sure how you got vectors in R^4 for the image basis, though
i also don't really know how you got 4x4 matrices from generally
the initial matrix has a row of zeros
so it's rank cant be 5
I went to the next biggest minor matrix (4x4) and its det=/=0
which means that rank(l)=4
which is also the dimension of Im(l)
no?
yes
so you take the columns of the biggest minor whose det /=0
correct me if I'm wrong
you need to use columns of the original matrix
ahhhh
right right right
thank you for pointing it out
this would be it, right?
well that's a matrix, but the columns of that matrix would be a basis
Closed by @pulsar sierra
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i put this into the form 3^x
3^-1?
yes
Put everything in terms of 3^something
So sqrt 3 write 3 to the half and 9 is 3 to the -2
Then you can add the exponents onto base 3
im a bit confused how do i write the 9 into apart of the power
(1/3)(1/sqrt(3)) = 3^−1 × 3 ^ −(1/2)
this is the question btw
Yes
is the answer 3^-1/2?
$\frac{1}{3\sqrt3} = \frac{1}{3 \cdot3^\frac{1}{2}} = \frac{1}{3^{1+\frac{1}{2}}}$
no it's not
Nyxzore
so would that be 3^-1.5?
yeah
@marsh warren Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello
I need help with linear algebra diganolization question
I don't understand the solution process at all. can anyone explain simply ?
hi
@lament obsidian Has your question been resolved?
what did u non understood....?
the general idea
like we wrote the Diganolization formula
then we got it in terms of A then I got lost
like why did we get it in terms of A and what is this summation ? our teacher told us two application of eigen values and vectors would be differential eq and to solve power of something
i just know we can write A like that so we substituted A and got P , P-¹ out by distributive law and we added all matrices to get single one
and there is expansion of e^-x we replaced that with
okay imma check it again after some mins
@lament obsidian Has your question been resolved?
@lament obsidian Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
.close
Closed by @shell pendant
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
If graphing a cosecant curve do you guys draw dat sin line first?
Do you think cosecant and secant are harder to interpret than a sin or cos curve?
Ehh actually it's not bad honestly
to interpret? no
to graph
Word
sure
.solved
Closed by @trail dune
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is it a good idea to read about math on wikipedia?
honestly i would never do that
Closed by @mortal yarrow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Books 
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Does one period of cosecant have two curves, one at the top and one at the bottom, and that is the curves that repeat?
@trail dune Has your question been resolved?
Yes
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
For this question, I read online that the answer is 2^12. It seems that it's because for every student/time-zone, there are two options (left or right timezone). However, doesn't previous pairing constrain future ones? For example, if 2AM pairs with 3AM, then doesn't that mean 4AM must pair with 5AM (since 3AM is paired already), thus only one option?
yeah, i would say there are two options as well
GMT pairs with GMT-1 or GMT+1
then the rest get fixed
@lost kindle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Dumb question.
But i have this for example:
1
1 3
1 5 7
1 8 2 4
the total number of components in this tree is: 10
and it is in the row 4.
How can I generalized it?
For example, what is the total number of components in row n ?
Are you asking how many elements are in a triangular thingy with height n?
are the numbers supposed to mean something or are they just numbers
just numbers
yes
so in the nth row, there are n numbers
and then n-1 numbers in the (n-1)th row
and so on until you get to 1 number in the 1st row
you essentially want to find what n + (n-1) + (n-2) + ... + 2 + 1 =
yea i was just being dumb
(n+1)n/2
Closed by @bleak wraith
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
An object with a mass of 100g has been thrown upwards with a force of 300N. How high will the object reach
How do you solve this?
potential and kinetic energy is the easiest way i can think of
yeah that must be shortest
What would be the steps
avtually it doesn't looks sovleable
like you need to assume the time in seconds, like maybe it took 0.1s to do the throw
but what's the right number
Uh assume 0.3 ig
even 0.1s makes it go with the speed of an airplane
Wait so ig my solution isn't wrong after all
I got 900m/s as initial velocity lmao
i suppose maybe it wasn't hand thrown, maybe it was some explosion
Well I just thought of that problem
I mean I made this problem so ig there's lots of flaws in here
Just some random thoughts to try and solve
,calc 0.1(900)^2/2
Result:
40500
when it moves at 900 m/s it has this kinetic energy
it all gets converted into potential energy at the highest point
and then it equals 0.1 × height × 9.8
,calc 40500/0.1/9.8
Result:
41326.530612245
41 km
it's tiny, so air drag makes a lot of difference
Or maybe the duration of throw is the one wrong
i mean, it's light, if it's also very tiny, maybe it doesn't
plot twist: air resistance is not negligible
Isn't it neglegible if the object is a ball

no, it's negligibe when it's heavy for the size
a paper ball is not
so you can't throw it far
or like ping pong ball
dont you need the time which the force was applied to the object for to work this out?
Idk
im pretty sure you do
Isn't 100g heavy enough
we don't know the size
fyi this was a joke
Oh lmao
because you can work out the objects acc to be 2990.2 m/s² but we have no way to determine the objects initial velocity as all our kinematic equations for initital velocity require time of movement and if we consider impulse momentum theorem it requires the time which force F was applied for
and we need initial velocity to determine the height that it will reach
Can't u get initial velocity using F=ma
Make assumptions on how long is the force applied ig
did you come up with this question for interest sake?
I tried 0.5 but the answer doesn't seem to be reasonable
Yea
0.01 seconds seems more reasonable but idk if 46 meters is realistic
you want a practical answer? Lets say I throw the object instantaneously and we use 0.01
$F_{net} \Delta t = m \Delta v$
Nyxzore
$(300-9.8(0.1))(0.01)= (0.1) (0-vi)$
Nyxzore
,w calc (300-9.8(0,1))(0.01)
$2.9902 = -0.1v_i$
Nyxzore
Wolfram Alpha doesn't understand your query!
Perhaps try rephrasing your question?
Click here to refine your query online
u can use f=ma
then solve for a
after that use kinetic and potentioal energy
to figure it out
did that already
.
so its done ?
thats how i got that acceleration
wht do u need help with ?
its not me that opened this channel
Idk would 45.92 meters be a reasonable answer
300N implies that the force is capable of accelerating 1kg at 300m.s^2
your object is accelerating at 2990.2 m/s²
so its going to go farely far
Wouldn't it go farther when mass is smaller
I don't think 46 meters high in the air is small
but 300N is also not small
What's the average force a human can do
actually mass is irrelevant to projective motion
I could throw 2 different mass objects with the same vi and theyd reach the same height
Actually mass is directly relevant to projective motion if you consider the relative mass compared to the air resistance
yes its different when including air resistance
but we're not including it here to my knowledge
Yea
Tho how do u solve this using kinetic energy
that effects how far will it go up
I don't think kinetic energy would be helpful here
youd need initial velocity
we can assume u = 0
what is u, final velocity?
we cant assume that
we know that v=0 since we want to work out maximum height
but u != 0 as the object is given an initial velocity when thrown
if it is thrown with 300N force
3000 will be acceleration
so i think 3000m/s can be assumed
as initial velocity
but other than that
no value of "u" is mentioned
Likely we need to consider this as a stochastic process and use the brownian motion
this will let us ignore the lack of initial conditions
wht do half of those words mean
What level of physics is this?
random unpredictable process and brownian motion is the seemingly random movement of paricles in fluids, put in laymans terms
grad ?
9th grade ?
Oh
oh
in india
Yeah in India we do this in like 5th grade
so I assumed that he was higher up
nvm then
common that was a steretype
Not in Madras
If you're on track to be advanced AIR then they let you skip
..
but anyways
We can get back to this
doubt
wait wot ?
u got good rank in jee advance ?
i suppose from this msg
🤣
Yes... but it has not much to do with this physics doubt
no wait
who...are u ?
if u did this while "g" years old
"g" years old?
i thoguht you knew physics...
9.8.... idiot...
he is fake AIR 10
I was not 9.8 years old in 5th grade maderchod
Like I said
u skipped 5th grade ?
which grade u started in
I started in 8th
so u did 9th syllabus
Briefly
when u were 11 ?
I did the 9th syllabus
@void sage Anyways what is your physics doubt about this problem?
what was ur year ?
hollup , let him cook now
Like I said this is personal
what we gonna do
I don't know if you have any abusive intentions
sorry you are right
find ur house
why would we abuse
a jee topper
i am child
They treat me with salt and abuse
Are you gandhi?
Damn britishers
I typically also only wear a loincloth and shawl
and one day I will become a great lawyer
When I am done with my OCI stint
Did you go to law school in iit madras?
Guys i think we are supposed to be helping chronny and not trolling him
Who is trolling? I keep asking what the remaining doubt is
are they trolling me
Chronny what is your doubt
No, I did JEE adv and then became an OCI to pursue english educational studies abroad
Would someone who would be jealous admit that to myself?
I remember one man
Nawal
he threatened to shoot me
ayoo
You are studying English literature?
Among many things yes
Your parents must be disappointed
shut up will ya
He got rank 6.9 + 4.20 = 11.1 chronny what is your doubt
They are consulates. Too busy to concern themselves with my studies
but I also study law, mathematics, physics, and diversature practices
so they are satisfied
Overachiever I see
bro wot family u live in
this a next level of sharman ji ka ladka
You might have had a 0.01% chance of getting into the best college in the world, Lovely professional university
it is pretty seletive
It would endanger me to say such things here
(rhetorical question)
Ah
ur relatives must have reached absolute 0 when they saw ur results
What is your doubt, professional disco dancer
I think he is trolling, he refuses to acknowledge the physics that he opened this channel for
I have asked
what
i did not open this channel bruv
Chronny what is your doubt
t
You can't solve this without the length of the time period that the force was acting in
I forgot, what grade level are we assuming of knowledge for this?
You need the impulse
no particular level
The question is incomplete
This is my thoughts, if we are only assuming 9th grade
Chronny the force needs to be applied for some amount of time as you have stated about 0.3s
300N force is not enough information to find the total kinetic energy imparted, which is required to find the maximum height
We can complete the general case if we are allowed outside assumptions on the physical intent of the system..
holy sHIT what
please speak 9th grade
or impulse, if the time interval is given
Wow, nice profile picture sir
He must be a genius
how would you find this using kinetic energy
Kinetic energy = potential energy
This is the time interval
he was in this server, he left tho
E=mc^2+AI
0.3 seems to be very big
seems to make sense to me
i got like 40km with that
!xy
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
Many would say that .01 is plenty
He made it up
I agree
Please read the thread
So you know how to do it given a time interval....
Omni has been typing for a while
We could try expressing the unit impulse as a fourier system, to account for potential air resistance wave in different fractals
to do the general case
An analogy might be useful. Let's say you have a glass, and you tell me that a pitcher pours 30mL/sec. And you tell me you used this pitcher to put water into the glass. This glass is a cylinder with a diameter of 3cm
Now I ask you, "how high is the water in the glass?"
@ornate rune ^ hope this helps with understanding what the problem is, the issue is directly analogous, but using different units.
Is your question why a time interval needs to be specified or how to do this particular problem
how to do this
Sir is crashing oout
!original
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
How did you get 40km with a 0.3s time interval?
300/100*10^-3 = 3000m/s^2
then multiply it by 0.3
900m/s velocity
900-9.8t = 0
solve for t
4500/49
then sub the t in 900t-1/2(9.8)t^2
45.92 meters (i just said 40km cuz i dont remember exactly the amount)
well its the original question, the question is just some thought that came into my mind that i wanted to solve for interest sake
Sir
The question that came into your mind as you say
Does not have enough information to solve
yea i found that out later on
so i made assumptions
This is okay. So what exactly is your question now? (You do realise you have solved the questiom you made)
Kinetic energy lost due to gravity is exactly the same as the potential energy gained due to gravitational potential (neglecting air resistance)
So we can find work = energy, which is Force * distance. So we just need to know how far the ball travels when under the influence of the force.
Alternatively, we can use time instead, but converting between the two is a little tricky without calculus
And as I understand it, you're in the 9th grade
Anyway, because energy is conserved, the energy of the ball leaving the source of force is equal to the energy of the ball at the apex of the path. Assuming up and down movement.
So you have Fx = mgy so y = Fx/(mg)
(where "x" is the distance over which the force is applied)
Uh I think using kinetic and potential energy is more complicated
OK anyways thanks for the help
.close
Closed by @ornate rune
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what is her most likely position when the roundabout rotates through an angle of 2pi?
They are asking what her rotation is after 35.5 pie radians
1 rotation is 2 pie radians
so where will her shadow be after 2pi radians?
So to get the full rotations, it would be 35.5pie/2pie
Which gives us 17.75 rotations
17 rotations and an extra .75
yeah you can do it that way
And 0.75 radian is 270 degrees
From her original position
But something I don’t understand is
How can her original position and 270 degrees both be position B
.75 rotations not radians
Right mb
there are two spots where the shadow on the wall is at B
for the same reason if you block a light with your hand in front of your eye vs with your arm all the way out, the light is still blocked
I mean i can understand that, but that didn’t really help in understand what i was asking
if you mark the point on the roundabout where jenny is, its a similar story
jenny is currently closer to the sun, when she rotates 0.75 rotations, she is closer to the wall
Ow i think I understand, let me draw it for you and you tell me if am correct
Like this?
@celest flume
So it will still cast a shadow, but this time because she is closer to the wall the shadow will either be bigger or smaller (idk how shadows work xd)
Closed by @glass mauve
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
if you write the polynomial as (x-z)(x-z*)(x-r)(x-r) and only look at the constant term, you can compare coefficients
we can know b by expanding (x-r)^2
@crimson sedge Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how did they graph it
15d + 40r >= 9000
the other equation in "the first two inequalities" is
i solved for x and it seems accurate enough but i still dont understand how they graph it
nvm i think i get it
.close
Closed by @trim wagon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone explain whats been done here?
ping me pls
Sine addition formula
whats that
$\sin (a+b)=\sin a\cos b + \cos a \sin b$
sin(a+b)?
4573r01d|)d357r0y3r 45²
oh
Yes
They moved xy to the other side and then squared
Then its just algebra
Closed by @gloomy mica
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed by @gloomy mica
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What was the working
No cap the 5 looks like S
yeah my bad
Seems correct
wait i meant to write 33 for the denom on the last one
right?
i dont know hwy i put 22
15 i meant lol
My brain not braining
22/33 is 2/3
So 2/3 sqrt 15
I think
np
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
@marsh warren Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can anyone help me with integrals? They're very basic i just started learning them but I don't get it Idk what i am doing wrong
send your question
@frail cobalt Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can anyone help me with this qst pls
what is the question?
to pick the answer that can possibly be true?
to pick the answer that is necessarily true?
the latter i'm assuming
none are necessarily true
Can you explain why pls
