#help-13

1 messages · Page 346 of 1

lyric narwhal
#

😭

#

because I don't know measure theory

#

i am familiar with young's inequality though

potent fractal
#

There're multiple proves on wikipedia, and none of them use Holder's inequality, because otherwise it would be circular reference

lyric narwhal
#

but I don't understand the statement of holder's inequality because I don't know measure theory

#

I got the basic idea but like..

lyric narwhal
#

isn't my inequality a special case of holder's inequality?

potent fractal
#

It is

#

But like

#

It's essentially the statement

lyric narwhal
#

I don't follow

potent fractal
#

Of course the general form requires measure theory and looks like this:

lyric narwhal
#

yep that's the part that scares me lol

potent fractal
#

But if you don't know measure theory then this is enough to grasp the idea:

lyric narwhal
#

okay

#

so you mean to say that I can in some way adapt the proof they've given to prove this inequality directly?

#

instead of using the measure theoretic stuff

potent fractal
#

yep

potent fractal
lyric narwhal
#

okay then

#

that's what I wanted, thanks

#

for our purposes S = R

#

I assume

#

so okay the step where they integrated

#

instead we want to sum

#

so $\sum_{i=1}^n |x_i y_i|\le\frac1{p}\sum_{i=1}^n |x_i|^p + \frac1{q}\sum_{i=1}^n |y_i|^q$

wraith daggerBOT
#

kheerii

lyric narwhal
#

so if we can prove $\frac1{p}\sum |x_i|^p\le\left(\sum |x_i|^p\right)^{1/p}$ we'd be done

wraith daggerBOT
#

kheerii

lyric narwhal
#

but this does not seem true

lyric narwhal
potent fractal
#

One sec I was adapting the first part

lyric narwhal
#

ahh

#

thank you so much

#

for doing all this lol

potent fractal
potent fractal
# wraith dagger **kheerii**

And here we seentially have $\sum_{i=1}^n |x_i y_i| \le \frac{1}{p}\lVert x\rVert_p^p + \frac{1}{p}\lVert y\rVert_q^q = \frac{1}{p} + \frac{1}{q} = 1$

lyric narwhal
#

What??

wraith daggerBOT
#

EQUENOS

potent fractal
lyric narwhal
#

Yeah that's the part that I didn't understand

#

Are we basically scaling all the values of xi and yi so that the sum of (xi)^p = 1?

potent fractal
#

yes

lyric narwhal
#

Hmm, alright...

potent fractal
#

After scaling both x and y the inequality stays unchanged

lyric narwhal
#

I suppose we can scale the quantities because the inequality is homogeneous

lyric narwhal
#

Okay now it makes sense

#

Turns out I was just intimidated by the measure theory stuff

potent fractal
#

Basiclaly we divided the inquality by $\lVert x\rVert_p \lVert y \rVert_q$

wraith daggerBOT
#

EQUENOS

lyric narwhal
#

Yess

#

That's awesome

potent fractal
#

indeed

lyric narwhal
#

So it's the young's inequality which is really important here

potent fractal
#

exactly

lyric narwhal
#

That's where the 1/p + 1/q = 1 thing comes from

#

Because I always found that super weird

#

I don't understanf thr motivation for this at all though like how and why did people think of this

potent fractal
lyric narwhal
#

how so?

potent fractal
#

There're so-called Banach spaces and dual spaces

lyric narwhal
#

oh I've heard of a dual space before

potent fractal
#

Banach spaces constitute a reasonable generalisation of finite-dimensional vector spaces with a norm

lyric narwhal
#

interesting

potent fractal
#

(bascially)

#

And there's probably the most used class of examples of banach spaces: so-called $l_p$-spaces

wraith daggerBOT
#

EQUENOS

lyric narwhal
#

it is not lol

lyric narwhal
#

I can't wait to study all this stuff

#

it sounds really cool

#

would this fall under abstract algebra?

potent fractal
#

You probably spotted a familiar sum here

#

And then mathematicians were like "hold on what's the dual of l_p"

lyric narwhal
#

ahhh

#

and it's just ||x||_q

potent fractal
#

Yeah it's l_q

lyric narwhal
#

yeah sorry

potent fractal
potent fractal
lyric narwhal
#

i haven't studied it at all lol sorry

potent fractal
#

oh that's okay

potent fractal
lyric narwhal
#

not much lol

#

we were taught basic manipulations with matrices and determinants and some vector algebra but that's about it

potent fractal
#

Oh that's enough to understand basic examples of dual spaces

lyric narwhal
#

I have encountered them once before

potent fractal
#

In a finite-dimensional euclidean space any linear function is just f(x) = (p, x) for some vector p

#

Here ( - , - ) is the dot-product and x is a vector

lyric narwhal
#

yep

#

so the dual space is just a space consisting of all such f?

potent fractal
lyric narwhal
#

okay

#

so what's the use of it

potent fractal
#

In finite-dimensional spaces this is incredibly boring

#

Becuase it's just R^n

#

But in infinite-dimensional spaces it's not so trivial

lyric narwhal
#

I think I came across an example where I created like a dual basis for a set of three vectors

#

in terms of their scalar triple product and stuff

#

let me see if I can find it

potent fractal
#

But that's another story

lyric narwhal
#

yeah I came across something called a reciprocal system of vectors

potent fractal
#

Yeah that looks like a dual basis

lyric narwhal
#

but how is this a basis for the space we defined above?

#

like how are three vectors in R^3 making up a basis of the dual space

#

you said the dual space was a space of functionals

potent fractal
#

It's not quite the basis, but there's a natural isomorphism that sends these vectors to the dual basis

#

Basically we say that f(x) = (a', x), g(x) = (b', x), h(x) = (c', x)

#

f, g and h act like a basis of the dual space

lyric narwhal
#

ohh okay, so then these three functions make up the basis

#

alrighty

#

it also makes sense why we define these vectors like this then

#

because i believe f g and h turn out to be orthogonal vectors

potent fractal
#

We achieved f(a) = 1, f(b) = 1, f(c) = 1

potent fractal
lyric narwhal
lyric narwhal
#

ooh but this means that a vector v in R^3 can be written as f(v)a'+g(v)b'+h(v)c'

#

right?

potent fractal
#

f(v)a + g(v)b + h(v)c

lyric narwhal
potent fractal
#

Let v = x a + y b + z c and use linearity of f, g, h

lyric narwhal
#

f(v)=x, g(v)=y, h(v)=z

#

oh yeah of course

#

my bad

#

okay that's kind of awesome actually

#

i'm still trying to wrap my mind around this stuff

#

it's so confusing but so satisfying when you get it

potent fractal
#

Yeah that's the beauty of learning mathematics :)

lyric narwhal
#

if you don't mind can you give me another concrete example of a dual space?

potent fractal
#

Hm we can try a finite-dimensional space with a different norm

lyric narwhal
#

sure :)

potent fractal
#

Let's say $\lVert x\rVert = \sum_{i=1}^n |x_i|$

wraith daggerBOT
#

EQUENOS

potent fractal
#

That's so-called l1-norm

lyric narwhal
#

oh it's the same as the l_p we saw before

potent fractal
#

Yep

#

p=1

#

Now we want to find all continuous linear functions on this space

lyric narwhal
#

yes

lyric narwhal
potent fractal
#

Continuous means that f^{-1}(open set) is open

potent fractal
lyric narwhal
#

oh yeah okay that makes sense actually

potent fractal
#

Trying to remember some stuff, 1 sec

lyric narwhal
#

all good

potent fractal
#

One can verify that the space of linear functions on a finite-dimensional space is also finite-dimensional

#

Because it's enough to define a linear function on basis vectors

lyric narwhal
#

but does it necessarily have the same dimension?

potent fractal
#

The interesting part is what's the norm on the dual space

potent fractal
potent fractal
#

Because we can construct the dual basis

#

Basically, if v1, ..., vn is the basis of X

#

Then let f_k(vk) = 1, 0 on other basis vectors

lyric narwhal
#

kronecker delta?

#

f_k(v_i)=delta_{i,k}

potent fractal
#

yep

lyric narwhal
#

is it necessarily that it has to be 1 or is that just some normalisation

potent fractal
#

It's not necessary

#

But it's convenient for our purposes

lyric narwhal
potent fractal
#

yes

lyric narwhal
#

alright that makes sense

potent fractal
#

Next we can prove that f_1, ..., f_n are linearly independent

#

(assuming you know what that means)

lyric narwhal
#

I do

potent fractal
#

splendid

lyric narwhal
#

I mean, intuitively it makes sense that these are lin. ind. but I do not know how I'd even start trying to prove that

potent fractal
#

Suppose there exists some non-zero tuple of coefficients c_k such that
c1 f1 + ... + cn fn = 0
Substitute v1 to both sides:
c1 = 0
Substitute v2 to both sides, etc.
c1 = c2 = ... = cn = 0

#

Contradiction

lyric narwhal
#

oh huh yeah

#

clever

potent fractal
#

So the dimension is at least n

lyric narwhal
#

and assuming the dimension of the original space and the dual space is the same this must be a basis

potent fractal
#

On the other hand, every linear function f can be represented as f = a1 f1 + ... + an fn and therefore the dimension is at most n

potent fractal
#

Anyways, currently we once again arrive at a boring dual space. It's of the same dimension

lyric narwhal
#

lmaoooo

potent fractal
#

However we can find the norm

lyric narwhal
#

do we not need the basis first?

potent fractal
#

nah

lyric narwhal
#

oh?

potent fractal
#

Well, we have it anyways

potent fractal
#

So the interesting part here is what's the norm in X*, given that X is endowed with l1-norm

lyric narwhal
#

ooh

#

hold on I think I can work this out

#

let me give it a shot

potent fractal
#

By definition, $\lVert f\rVert = \sup{|f(x)| \ : \ \lVert x\rVert \le 1}$

wraith daggerBOT
#

EQUENOS

potent fractal
lyric narwhal
#

are we assuming an n dimensional X?

potent fractal
#

Yes

lyric narwhal
#

alrighty

#

and I have to work out the norm of f in terms of its coefficients?

potent fractal
#

And we already proved that dimX* = dimX

lyric narwhal
#

wait it'll just be the largest coefficient

potent fractal
#

exactly

lyric narwhal
#

how is that a norm what?

potent fractal
#

That's so-called $l_\infty$-norm

wraith daggerBOT
#

EQUENOS

lyric narwhal
#

ahh

#

because it's the max

potent fractal
#

$\lVert f \rVert_\infty = \max|f_i|$

wraith daggerBOT
#

EQUENOS

lyric narwhal
#

yep

lyric narwhal
potent fractal
#

That's the special case of operator norm

#

There's a very natural way of endowing the space of operators with a norm

lyric narwhal
#

oh I think I've seen that

potent fractal
lyric narwhal
#

$$\norm{f}=\min{c: \norm{f(x)}\le c\norm{x}\ \forall x\in X}$$

wraith daggerBOT
#

kheerii

lyric narwhal
#

something like this?

potent fractal
#

Yeah it's equivalent

#

(I assume you meant c>=0)

lyric narwhal
#

does a norm not have to be non-negative anyways?

potent fractal
#

oh yeah the lower bound for c doesn't matter

#

mb

lyric narwhal
#

hmm alright

#

thank you so much for giving me a mini lesson on dual spaces eeveekawaii

#

and for answering the original question lol

potent fractal
#

You're welcome :)

lyric narwhal
#

looking at the wiki it seems like you are right, the infinite dimensional case is much more interesting

#

since the dual space has higher dimension than the original space

potent fractal
#

They're both infinite-dimensional but behave differently

lyric narwhal
#

the dual space is isomorphic to F^A, where F is the field the original vector space was over, and A is the indexing set of a countable basis of V

potent fractal
lyric narwhal
potent fractal
#

We proved that in a very special case

#

They're talking about a more general thing

#

(Which is amazingly also true)

lyric narwhal
#

yeah under any measure

potent fractal
#

L_p spaces are functional spaces

lyric narwhal
#

i don't get what the second thing is trying to say

potent fractal
#

The main point here is that (L_inf)* \neq L_1 as one might hope

lyric narwhal
#

LOL

#

the dual space of a dual space giving the original space

#

that would be funny

#

almost seems like it should be true

potent fractal
#

(L_2)** = L_2

#

(yay)

#

In fact, L_2 is almost too amazing to exist (it's a separable hilbert space)

lyric narwhal
#

wait, is it true that (L_p)*=L_q?

#

(where 1/p+1/q=1)

potent fractal
#

Yes, if 1 < p < inf

lyric narwhal
#

woahh

lyric narwhal
#

that is awesome

potent fractal
#

yes

lyric narwhal
#

is this fact related to the inequality we were talking about initially?

potent fractal
#

Yes

#

The fact that (L_p)* = L_q directly follows from Holder's inequality

lyric narwhal
#

oh

#

I thought it would be the other way around

potent fractal
#

Since interchanging p and q doesn't change anything conceptually, (L_p)** = L_p

lyric narwhal
#

very cool

potent fractal
#

yep, that's called being reflexive

lyric narwhal
# wraith dagger **EQUENOS**

so here considering $X$ to have $l_p$ norm we would have $$\begin{aligned}
\norm{f}&=\sup{|f(x)|:\sum |x_i|^p\le 1}\
&=\sup{|\sum a_ix_i|:\sum |x_i|^p\le 1}\
\end{aligned}$$

potent fractal
#

yep

lyric narwhal
#

clearly the max would just be when norm{x}=1

#

but what would f look like

#

hmmmm

potent fractal
#

Using the dual basis we can certainly obtain something

#

Oh and triangle inequality

lyric narwhal
#

I'm just kind of confused about what f looks like here lol

potent fractal
#

a1 f1(x) + ... + an fn(x)

lyric narwhal
#

I think we need to find the basis

lyric narwhal
potent fractal
#

Where fk(vj) = delta(k,j)

lyric narwhal
#

hmm

potent fractal
lyric narwhal
#

this looks right

#

not sure if it is

#

okay yeah it should be

wraith daggerBOT
#

kheerii

lyric narwhal
#

okay yeah this just follows from Holder's now

#

neat

#

$$\begin{aligned}
|\sum a_ix_i|&\le\sum |a_ix_i|\
&\le\left(\sum |a_i|^q\right)^{1/q}\left(\sum |x_i|^p\right)^{1/p}\
&\le\left(\sum |a_i|^q\right)^{1/q}\end{aligned}$$ so $X^*$ has $l_q$ norm

wraith daggerBOT
#

kheerii

potent fractal
#

Yep

#

An important remark is that the equality is achievable

lyric narwhal
#

yes, when a_i = x_i^(p/q) for all i, and sum (x_i)^p = 1

#

right?

potent fractal
#

a1=x1=1, ai=xi=0

potent fractal
#

Too lazy to check

lyric narwhal
#

lol it's alright

#

it's just from when equality holds in the normal holder's inequality, so it should be right

#

thank you so much once again!!

#

your help is much appreciated catking

#

.close

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @lyric narwhal

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

cedar kilnBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

tepid wyvern
#

Good evening, I've got this thing to resolve when K is -1.

tepid wyvern
#

Also, how do I make this system incompatible by just modifying the third equation?

#

<@&286206848099549185>

cedar kilnBOT
#

@tepid wyvern Has your question been resolved?

cedar kilnBOT
#

@tepid wyvern Has your question been resolved?

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

rustic storm
#

Is this right?

cedar kilnBOT
rustic storm
#

Cause twacher didint explained with triple things

#

And with doble i shouldve shown the space where the both are right

#

But here idunno

#

Got this too

#

<@&286206848099549185>

#

Its at the start

#

Blue letters

#

At the top i mean

cedar kilnBOT
#

@rustic storm Has your question been resolved?

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

static tree
cedar kilnBOT
static tree
#

can someone help me

cedar kilnBOT
#

@static tree Has your question been resolved?

cedar kilnBOT
#

@static tree Has your question been resolved?

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

olive dirge
#

hi

cedar kilnBOT
sweet bay
olive dirge
#

I need someone to correct me in this

#

this gotta be false right?

#

dosent the function need the intervals to have same value

sweet bay
#

Are you familiar with Roulle's Theorem?

olive dirge
#

kind of yeah

strange hamlet
#

Because it must exist, rolle’s theorem

#

Let me see

olive dirge
#

yeah i am kinda confused..

strange hamlet
#

Let f’(c)=2/2=1

#

I think it’s mvt

olive dirge
#

if its mvt it has to be flase then

strange hamlet
#

Yes

#

That’s why I felt a bit weird

dreamy void
olive dirge
#

yeah i think so as well. idk still confused

#

just to make sure i put it in ai 😂

#

chat gpt says false gemini says true

#

im like bro 🤣

dreamy void
strange hamlet
#

F’(x)=0 x in [-2,0]

surreal pivot
dreamy void
#

the second condition is not met, so the statement is not necessarily true

olive dirge
#

yeah it is false

#

thank you guys for the help, I appreciate it!

#

.close

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @olive dirge

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

cedar kilnBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

quaint scarab
#

so, this is probably stupid, but I'm not sure how to interpret this question:

Lunar astronauts placed a reflector on the Moon's surface, off which a laser beam is periodically reflected. The distance to the Moon is calculated from the round-trip time. (a) To what accuracy in meters can the distance to the Moon be determined, if this time can be measured to 0.100 ns?

quaint scarab
#

could anyone help me with understanding how I give an "accuracy in meters"?

crimson sedge
quaint scarab
#

well, even then, that's 10 sig figs and the answer I'm getting, (c*2.5)/2=374740572.5m, is only 10 digits total

dawn junco
#

well ok the laser travels at speed c alright

#

what distance does the laser travel in 0.100ns then ?

quaint scarab
#

0.0299792458m

crimson sedge
#

how is 0.100 10 sif figs?

quaint scarab
#

ns is 10^-9 s

crimson sedge
#

you would choose the least amount of sig figs in the quesiton

fair geyser
#

i'm just guesssing but it maybe means between 0.01499 and 0.04497 it gets rounded to 0.029979

#

so you can trust one digit after decimal?

#

0.1 m

#

are there options?

quaint scarab
#

there are not options, it's a blank input field

fair geyser
#

well 10 sigdigs is also 0.1 m

dawn junco
fair geyser
#

ah

dawn junco
#

that's how I understand it at least

fair geyser
#

of course

#

0.001 m then

#

idk

#

well ok, i guess it's what cka said

#

minimum between inifintite digits and 12

#

0.000000000001 m?

#

so confusing

#

actually it makes no sense that two zeroes count

dawn junco
#

why do you have those huge changes

dawn junco
crimson sedge
dawn junco
#

it's just a question of which accuracy you give

dawn junco
#

0.1ns vs 0.100000ns have very different tolerances

fair geyser
#

they don't matter

crimson sedge
#

they do matter. they are significant

fair geyser
#

why not say 0.001 then

crimson sedge
#

bc its not 0.001 its 0.100.

not 0.101, 0.105, 0.111 --> its 0.100

fair geyser
#

0.0299792458m makes sense, i can live with that, but it's ignoring the two zeroes

crimson sedge
#

this makes more sense

#

no one saw that right

fair geyser
#

i didn't save it

crimson sedge
#

good

#

ignore it

fair geyser
#

half of what i thought

crimson sedge
#

from my good friend ChatGPT

fair geyser
#

still the zeroes don;t matter

crimson sedge
#

i guess so

#

i didn't know if it was a sig fig question or what

dawn junco
#

we'll know when OP inputs something ig

fair geyser
#

oh shit

#

it's divided by 2 because it's roundtrip not because reasons

dawn junco
#

reasons = roundtrip

#

dang we managed to miss that

fair geyser
#

the problem is it rounded the speed of light

#

if it didn;t would this answer have around 10 digits?

dawn junco
#

but 0.100ns only has 3 digits precision as we argued before

#

so assuming the question gives a shit about sig figs, the answer should have 3 digits precision then

fair geyser
#

no i don't buy that

#

i can't explain why they say 0.100 instead of 0.1

#

but it's the increment, it doesn't have an additional precision to it

dawn junco
#

yeah that could make sense also

#

the only question is whether OP's answer grading program is a sig fig hardass or not

cedar kilnBOT
#

@quaint scarab Has your question been resolved?

fair geyser
#

@crimson sedgeask it to use the exact speed of light

crimson sedge
#

chatgpt is not the most reliable

#

so i'd take it with a grain of salt

fair geyser
#

thanks

#

no of course not

quaint scarab
#

I've now tried .149 and it's counted as wrong

fair geyser
#

.149 is wrong in any case

#

you would round to 0.15

#

(i don't know if it's 0.150)

#

i would try 0.15

quaint scarab
#

sorry, input -8 by mistake and didn't notice, not -9, answer is .015m

fair geyser
#

ok

quaint scarab
#

now to figure out part b....

fair geyser
#

i just noticed chatgpt messed it up the second time

quaint scarab
#

ehh, might need help with this part too...

#

(b)
What percent accuracy is this, given the average distance to the Moon is 3.84*10^8 m?

fair geyser
#

uh

quaint scarab
#

initial thought was to treat .015 as the top difference value and perform (0.015/3.84*10^8)

fair geyser
#

yeah

#

but you maybe divide by 2?

quaint scarab
#

bottom value? it's already the average distance

fair geyser
#

not becuase of the roundtrip

quaint scarab
#

ah

#

hm

fair geyser
#

because 5% is ±2.5%

#

but i don't know

#

it would be strange

fair geyser
#

wait wait

#

"top difference" is half of that

#

so yeah i guessed right

#

or at least your instinct was the same

#

or i misunderstood

quaint scarab
#

so we agree it should be (0.015/3.84*10^8)?

fair geyser
#

yeah

#

no complications first

quaint scarab
#

awesome

#

it was correct, value of 3.9e-9

fair geyser
#

cool

quaint scarab
#

appreciate all your help everyone, very weirdly phrased question I hadn't had to deal with yet, so I was a bit lost haha

#

.close

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @quaint scarab

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

cedar kilnBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

amber elk
#

derivatives of inverse, what am I even doing?

lime tartan
#

The function compositions

#

And it'll become immediately clear

amber elk
#

oh i see

#

thanks 🔥

#

.close

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @amber elk

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

cedar kilnBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

languid cypress
#

This is what I initially got stuck on

languid cypress
#

Trying to figure out Cot (22.5) without a calculator. I’m trying to do 1/tan(45/2) but I’m stuck in how to get the answer of Root square 2 +1

#

Perhaps something like this could work?

stable oasis
#

I think you're right , keep going

languid cypress
stable oasis
#

Do you want the final answer?

languid cypress
#

I have the final answer.

stable oasis
#

A/2 is 22.5° so A is 45°

languid cypress
#

That’s the final answer

#

Oh I have an earlier image, there’s two images.

stable oasis
#

Oh i think i did it wrong lmao , i got

languid cypress
#

Yeah I am confused

#

Ok my calculator does show that this makes the final answer. How would I solve it algebraically?

stable oasis
#

Strike out the 4 then multiply with conjugate of √(2-√2) which is √(2+√2)

stable oasis
languid cypress
#

I have no idea. I’m just trying to get to the key answer lmao

stable oasis
#

Okay , so what are you confused with?

languid cypress
#

The algebra mainly

languid cypress
#

Got stuck here since operating would just cancel it with the -Rad2 downstairs

cedar kilnBOT
#

@languid cypress Has your question been resolved?

languid cypress
#

Where did this 4-2 come from? When you moved the 2 from beneath the square root it counted as a power of 2 to multiply the 2 -> 4 and remove the square root on the other 2?

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

wraith rapids
cedar kilnBOT
wraith rapids
#

Why would this not be even?

#

if you plug in -x

#

you get -x^2sin(-x)

#

which cancels out to get back to x^2sinx

humble karma
#

$(-x)^2 = x^2$

wraith daggerBOT
#

Azyrashacorki

wraith rapids
#

Wouldn't -x^4 also equal x^4

empty bobcat
#

what?

dull oxide
wraith daggerBOT
cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @wraith rapids

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

dull oxide
cedar kilnBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

shell agate
cedar kilnBOT
shell agate
#

idk if I did tis right but it converges for certain a and p but not all so is that divergent or did I do it wrong

shell agate
cedar kilnBOT
#

@shell agate Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @shell agate

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

slim thicket
#

I have a study guide that I really need help running through even if its like one question per section please and thank you

slim thicket
#

.close

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @slim thicket

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

cedar kilnBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

vernal sentinel
#

'Surprise' boxes of chocolates each contain 15 chocolates: 3 lemon, 5 are orange and 7 are strawberry.
Petra has a lot of Surprise chocolates. She chooses 3 chocolates at random from the box. She eats the chocolate before choosing the next one.

"Find the probability that none of Petra's 3 chocolates has orange flavour."

Guys, i found the answer by 10/15 * 9/14 * 8/13 = 24/91

will i get the same answer if i multiply one by one like LLL, LLS, LSL, LSS, SLL, ... (etc)?

radiant scaffold
#

lemon and strawberry perhaps

vernal sentinel
#

bcs i didn't realize we can do 10/15 * 9/ 14 * 8/13 previously

#

and i counted it one by one, but i got it wrong

#

anyways thank you!!

#

.close

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @vernal sentinel

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

cedar kilnBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

cold dust
cold dust
#

Yes, but I haven't graphed it yet

#

I'm currently doing the waves

#

That's exactly what I want to do

#

Shade an area

#

I want to shade the red area with red and blue area with blue

#

No I want to shade them

#

I already did the calcs

#

Yeah

#

I have the bounds

#

I don't know how to shade them

cedar kilnBOT
#

@cold dust Has your question been resolved?

cedar kilnBOT
#

@cold dust Has your question been resolved?

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

gray isle
#

Suppose that m and p are real numbers for which the polynomial
f(x) = x^2 + mx + p
has two distinct positive real roots. Prove that the polynomial
g(x) = x^2 - (m^2 - 2p)x + p^2
has two distinct positive real roots

Hi, I ended up using vieta's formula to set m and p equal to the roots, then I subbed in those roots into the B and C terms for g(x), and found the discriminant which I got R_1^4 - 2r_1^2r_2^2 + r_2^4

gray isle
#

can someone confirm

pastel vault
wraith daggerBOT
#

south, just south

pastel vault
#

yeah you've massively overcomplicated the problem

gray isle
pastel vault
#

just use the fact the discriminants have to be > 0

gray isle
#

thats why it got so complicated

pastel vault
gray isle
pastel vault
#

GPT suggested a horribly inefficient method

#

you do not need to find the roots of f(x) explicitly to do this problem

gray isle
#

Thank you

#

.close

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @gray isle

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

cedar kilnBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

crimson sedge
cedar kilnBOT
crimson sedge
#

There are only one pair of values.

#

Use the factor theorem.

#

i am getting -23

#

i dont know whether it is correct

#

i am not sure

#

If (x-a) | f(x), then f(a) = 0

crimson sedge
#

a or b?

#

?

#

a = -23

#

well

#

a = 23

#

and b = -14

#

1 sec

#

wdym

#

yup

crimson sedge
#

,w subsitute x = 1 in x^3 - 10x^2 + ax + b

wraith daggerBOT
crimson sedge
#

,w substitute x = 2 in x^3 - 10x^2 + ax + b

wraith daggerBOT
crimson sedge
#

,w solve {2a+b-32=0} and {a+b-9=0}

crimson sedge
wraith daggerBOT
crimson sedge
#

well

#

you have made a mistake

#

where?

#

Ok bro

#

.close

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @rustic geode

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

crimson sedge
#

thank you bro

cedar kilnBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

#
Channel closed

Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

crisp halo
#

Hello!

I am trying to learn how to see what kind of infinite series I am analyzing

crisp halo
#

I think 2 is a geometric series

#

11-14 is telescoping like the instructions say

#

but i dont know what the ones to the power of n are called

crisp halo
#

and is 2 also geometric?

crimson sedge
#

yes

crisp halo
#

okay thanks

#

.close

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @crisp halo

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

dusk finch
#

everything else seems to be either geometric or a sum of 2 geometric series

#

if you do some appropriate manipulations

crisp halo
#

I will try!!

#

.reopen

cedar kilnBOT
#

crisp halo
#

I don’t understand how to see what r or a is

#

also i dont understand how to get it into the form so that the power says n-1

vivid wadi
#

$\frac{1}{(2 + \pi)^{2n}} = (2 + \pi)^{-2n} = ((2 + \pi)^{-2})^n$

wraith daggerBOT
cedar kilnBOT
#

@crisp halo Has your question been resolved?

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

cedar kilnBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

grave nexus
cedar kilnBOT
grave nexus
#

black is f(x) and red is f'(x)

#

is the f'(x) a correct sketch?

dull oxide
#

Acceptably close enough

cedar kilnBOT
#

@grave nexus Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @grave nexus

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

sullen wind
#

I have to solve it, dont have any certain idea

edgy sun
#

idk might not help much

sullen wind
#

yea, but what next...

cerulean sail
#

noticing 10 is 5 * 2 might help a bit too!

sullen wind
#

okey, maybe it's stupid question but after deviding like that what I should do with a "x"

#

it should be like (5*2)^x

#

or what

cerulean sail
#

You can then write that as 2^x * 5^x, and if you spot it, you can turn this into a quadratic (in)equation if you e.g. divide by something "nice" catThink

merry solstice
merry solstice
#

so he will let (a^x) be another variable so that this equation is easier to solve

cerulean sail
#

(you can and may find it easier to substitute, but what you'd make your "substitution" for probably isn't integer!)

merry solstice
#

a is a variable

merry solstice
#

and how should we manipulate the equation so that it is easier to substitute this variable

sullen wind
#

I think I should do something with 2^x

#

but I'm not sure

#

ah

#

omg I'm so stupid with this example

#

it kills me

merry solstice
merry solstice
#

or you could use two variables

#

I think

sullen wind
cerulean sail
wraith daggerBOT
#

@cerulean sail

merry solstice
#

I need to learn how to code TeXit lol

#

anyways

merry solstice
sullen wind
#

em 2^x and 5^x?sully

merry solstice
#

we'll denote 2^x as a and 5^x as y

#

so

#

what would this make our equation

#

I'll help you out

#

we can denote 2^2x as (2^x)^2

#

because of the identity (a^bc)=(a^b)^c

merry solstice
sullen wind
#

so it's gonna be a^2 - y^2 -(a*y)>0?

merry solstice
#

oops I meant 5^x as b

#

remember, there is a -2*(5^x)^2

edgy sun
#

I have a follow up question after he’s done

merry solstice
#

So it would be a^2-2b^2-ab=0

#

@cerulean sail

#

how would we solve this equation

merry solstice
#

in doing this

sullen wind
merry solstice
#

the term is (-2*5^2x)

#

which we can denote as (-2*5^x^2)

#

We get a^2-ab-2b^2<0

sullen wind
#

oh okey I get it now

merry solstice
#

sorry I had a brain fart

merry solstice
sullen wind
#

reduicng it to (a-b)^2?

#

oh no

#

no

#

we cant

#

fck\

merry solstice
#

good

sullen wind
#

we can XD?

merry solstice
#

another thing we can try is factoring

merry solstice
sullen wind
#

I'm suprised that we can simplify it to this form (a-b)^2

#

with 2b^2

merry solstice
#

we can factor the equation

#

not as (a-b)^2

#

but as (a-2b)(a+b)

#

do you get how I got here?

sullen wind
#

yea you just modify it right?

#

with

#

2b

#

bneacuse

#

we have it here

sullen wind
#

so it need to be in our

#

how we can say that in english

#

omg

merry solstice
sullen wind
#

formula?

merry solstice
#

well I find factoring easier if possible

cerulean sail
# merry solstice <@788085606483361802>

My original suggestion was more that e.g. if you divide through the $2^{2x} - 2\cdot 5^{2x} < 2^x \cdot 5^x$ by, say, $5^{2x}$, you then get $\qty(\frac25)^{2x} - 2 < \qty(\frac25)^x$, from where you could, say, substitute $u = \qty(\frac25)^x$ and solve the resulting quadratic inequality, making note that you must therefore have $u > 0$

wraith daggerBOT
#

@cerulean sail

merry solstice
merry solstice
#

Since you know how to do it chartbit's way

#

I"ll just show you my way

#

If (a-2b)(a+b)<0, then -b<a<2b

#

or

#

-5^x<2^x<2*5^x

#

If you divide by 5^x

#

you get

#

-1<(2/5)^x<2

#

and if you use a log, then 0<x

#

Hope that helps!

edgy sun
merry solstice
sullen wind
#

the answer should be something like that, sorry for not showing it before, I didn't see it

edgy sun
edgy sun
merry solstice
#

it's something like x^a*x^b=x^ab

#

but with the bases

#

I was just taught the formula and not how to derive ti

edgy sun
#

oh i might just be dyslexic

merry solstice
#

oh lol

#

it's ok

edgy sun
#

for some reason i thought you were saying (a+b)^2=a^2+b^2

merry solstice
merry solstice
edgy sun
#

so do you distinguish ab^2 and a^2*b^2 with parentheses?

#

like ab^2≠(ab)^2

edgy sun
#

like how do you know when it’s just b squared versus ab squared

sullen wind
merry solstice
#

so we go back to the part where (a+2b)(a-b)<0

#

do you understand how we get -b<a<2b?

sullen wind
#

yes, it's simple

#

why is that

merry solstice
merry solstice
#

so when we substitute out the variables, we get

#

-5^x<2^x<(2^x)*5^x

#

dividing by 5^x, we get that -1<(2/5)^x<2^x

#

sorry I mis-substituted the variable

#

to isolate the x, we put a log(2/5) on all terms

#

However, logs can't be negative, so that means that 0<x

#

also, we know the limit of log(2/5)of 2^x goes to infinity eventuall

#

so it's like 0<x<infinity

sullen wind
#

ok. I agree and then?

merry solstice
#

Hmm

#

I don't know how you get the log(2/5)2

#

as the lower limit

sullen wind
#

okey, I undestand it, don't worry

cedar kilnBOT
#

@sullen wind Has your question been resolved?

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

whole parrot
#

how am i wrong bro

cedar kilnBOT
lime tartan
whole parrot
#

what

lime tartan
#

e^4 + e^4.5 will tell you the sum of the heights, but we want the sum of the areas

whole parrot
#

i dont get it

lime tartan
#

We go from e^4 to e^4.5 when we split it in half, then e^4.5 to e^5 like you correctly identified. But this is only half of the work. We’re finding the areas of the rectangles, not just the heights

#

So, each rectangle is that tall, but what’s the width of the rectangle?

whole parrot
#

do they want me to multiply by deltax too

#

im lost

lime tartan
whole parrot
#

i hate math

#

thanks

lime tartan
#

Because that will give you the area of the rectangle

#

No problem

whole parrot
#

.close

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @whole parrot

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

cedar kilnBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

sacred socket
#

What am I doing wrong in calculating the time the ball is in the air for this problem? Sorry its messy I was using Word.

cedar kilnBOT
#

@sacred socket Has your question been resolved?

cedar kilnBOT
#

@sacred socket Has your question been resolved?

still ledge
#

hello

#

i’m here to help

#

This is just a kinematics questions, so we can neglect the mass here

#

(for A)

#

@sacred socket so what i’m looking at is that you were only calculating the time it was taking to only go up

#

not up and down

#

Also, are they counting for sig figs?

sacred socket
#

I don't think significant figures matters.

still ledge
#

I got a similar answer

#

but I think maybe just use more digits just like you did with the 2nd one

#

18.32390191 is a good approximation

sacred socket
#

Thanks for the help.

cedar kilnBOT
#

@sacred socket Has your question been resolved?

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @sacred socket

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

simple torrent
#

Hey I'm trying to prove that |zw|=|z||w| with the exponential form of complex numbers. Here's the supposed solution:

simple torrent
#

Isn't this self-referential? (step 4 separating one magnitude into two products)

cedar kilnBOT
#

@simple torrent Has your question been resolved?

dire geode
cedar kilnBOT
#

@simple torrent Has your question been resolved?

simple torrent
#

sqrt(r^2(sin^2+cos^2))=sqrt(r^2)=r

#

If r>=0

grand stone
dire geode
cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

sharp veldt
#

how is is 5,10

cedar kilnBOT
sharp veldt
#

for context, u have to derivate these functions and equal each to 0 or 10

#

so for second equation, dy/dx=10 and I have to solve for t

#

so wouldnt it be
10t - 50 = 10
10t = 10 + 50
10t = 60
t=6

vivid furnace
#

Why r u setting it equal to 10 if your looking for critical points

sharp veldt
#

heres the full answer

plucky merlin
#

I think those points are (x, y), following the parameterized functions
5t^2 - 50t + 83 -> 10t - 50 = 0 => t = 5, given x = t, y = 0 therefore (5, 0)
483 + 5t^2 - 50t -> 10t - 50 = 0 => t = 5 given x = t, y = 10 therefore (5, 10)
10t^2 - 60t + 83 -> 20t - 60 = 0 => t = 3 given x = 0, y = t therefore (0, 3)
83 + 10t^2 - 60t -> 20t - 60 = 0 => t = 3 given x = 10, y = t therefore (10, 3)

This is what I noticed, the (t, f) {as I am calling the output f here} is going to be (t, 0) but then consider the parameters. Is this not what is going on?

sharp veldt
#

no

#

actually u know what

#

u might be right

#

maybe my prof was explaining it wrong

plucky merlin
#

I was gonna say the next step has f(x, y) and uses those points meaning they have to be (x, y), not (t, whateva)

sharp veldt
#

yeahh ur right

#

thanks a lot

#

.close

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @sharp veldt

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

cedar kilnBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

bleak marsh
cedar kilnBOT
bleak marsh
#

I need help with a triple integral using polar coordinates, cause I am getting stumped on the bounds

#

:(

#

tried reworking the bounds and is still not given an answer

#

<@&286206848099549185>

cedar kilnBOT
#

@bleak marsh Has your question been resolved?

cedar kilnBOT
#

@bleak marsh Has your question been resolved?

cedar kilnBOT
#

@bleak marsh Has your question been resolved?

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

tender cipher
#

how would you determine the answer between B and C?

coral jewel
#

great solution, except you should keep it to yourself and let op do the work

#

give hints

cedar kilnBOT
#

@tender cipher Has your question been resolved?

tender cipher
#

aight i get that thanks

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @tender cipher

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

coarse junco
cedar kilnBOT
coarse junco
#

I can't see the connection between the cone's slant and the radius of the sphere (10cm).

#

Which topic should I revisit?

cedar kilnBOT
#

@coarse junco Has your question been resolved?

cedar kilnBOT
#

@coarse junco Has your question been resolved?

coarse junco
#

. close

#

.close

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @coarse junco

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

crimson sedge
#

Help me understand 2 math subjects.

Why?
I do not understand and Youtube doesn't help me (My opinion but I will try again if you suggest). I also have a quiz tomorrow with these 2 subjects.

What subjects?
General Chemistry - Alkanes & Cycloalkanes (Naming ang Drawing Line and Structural Formula)
Mathematics - geometry and data sufficiency

crimson sedge
#

Which do you prefer to start first?

crimson sedge
#

<@&286206848099549185>

cedar kilnBOT
#

@crimson sedge Has your question been resolved?

crimson sedge
#

<@&286206848099549185>

#

Come onnn

#

YES

crimson sedge
#

I just don't... understand the topic...

#

Uhh

#

Want me to grab the powerpoint...?

#

okeh

#

I can send you the photos instead

#

As soon as I saw Page 11

#

I didn't understand it

#

Wha

#

WHAT?

#

okay-

#

SORRY

#

BOI

#

I got into an argument in the gc

#

Anyways

#

Wait

#

NO

#

I UNDERSTAND THAT

#

I just.. don't know anything about the properties of triangle

#

GIRL

#

Focus

#

I need to know like

#

I don't understand the properties of triangle

lean lotus
#

basic properties?

#

or like trig properties

crimson sedge
#

DON'T JUDGE ME I HAVE A WEIRD PROBLEM WITH MY BRAIN OKAY

#

HOLY

#

Im 11.........

#

SHUT

#

IM STILL A MINOR GUYS

dusk goblet
crimson sedge
#

11

#

Now let's go back to the topic

#

:3

#

What the skibidi are they saying

#

What

#

How

#

yeah

#

OHHHH

#

Okay

#

What the 1 sum

#

I don't get it

#

So

#

A is 180

#

B is 180

#

C is 180?

#

Now I don't get it

#

What

#

Oh

#

90

#

90

#

Correct?

#

WHAT?!

#

Oh

#

oh.

#

Okeh

#

Yeah

#

Broading

#

Soo..

#

is that all the explanation?

crimson sedge
#

Really????

cedar kilnBOT
#

@crimson sedge Has your question been resolved?

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

cinder jay
#

"The solutions to the equation sin kv = a that are in the interval 0° ≤ y ≤ 360° are marked in the figure.
Determine the constants k and a."

cinder jay
#

I dont even know where to start tbh

#

<@&286206848099549185>