#help-13
1 messages · Page 340 of 1
Closed by @plush wharf
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
The teacher had never taught this before and the book does a poor explanation on how to do it, could someone explain what it's even asking me to do?
did they teach vectors?
direction and magnitude
We are supposed to be teached vektors but the teacher had rarely been to class this few weeks
I see
well they're pretty easy at this level!
Basically, you'd be taught the difference between a vector and a scalar - a scalar is a quantity, so it's only got magnitude - for example, 60 km/h, because we only have the value/magnitude, not direction. Vector's have both direction and magnitude, so 60km/h in the east direction is a vector.
What they want you to do here is draw an arrow that represents both of those things - direction and magnitude - to show a car going east at 60 km/h. The length of the arrow will represent the magnitude - 60 km/h - and the direction represents the direction in cardinal - East.
So I'm just supposed to draw an arrow with the length of 1cm for the 60 km/h?
To the east :P?
If that's how you'd like to define 60km/h, yup! It seems like they may want you to define your scaling
so 1cm/(60km/h)
It did say that the 1cm is representing a km/h and since the only thing the question said about km/h is 60 huh?
But for some reason my classmates is telling me it's 20km/h
?
Yeah, and the axes seem pretty small, so I'd say they're probs looking for 1cm/(60km/h)
I didn't get how they got 20km/h that's why I'm asking :P?
If you wanted to define the scaling as 1cm/(20km/h), it would be a 3cm arrow
so maybe that's it?
Wait what, so is it 60 km/h or 20? Bcz if it is 20 how did they get to 20?
Well, this all depends on how you want to scale your axes, really
The answer to the question is just a drawing, no? So the definition can be whatever, for example, yours as you defined it is 60km/h per centimenter - a 1cm arrow
But if your friend wants to define it as 20km/h per centimenter, they'd have to draw a 3cm arrow
Huh, so both answers are correct?
Depending on if they drew the right length arrow, yup
Ohh alr, ty ^^
np! if you plan to go into physics, engineering, or machine learning, vectors are super important, so good to learn them well
Sorry, extra question, It says to use a name for the vector, what name does it mean?
West east thing?
That is a bit tricky depending on what they want, but I'd say they want the starting point, which is (0,0)
And then the ending point, which is (0,1cm) - or (0,60km/h)
If they haven't defined anything else in relation to that, you'd start at the center - (0,0) - and then your arrow would end 1cm up - (0,1cm)
Depending on what they want, it could also just be (0,1cm)
but this seems more likely

.close
Closed by @analog jackal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
this correct?
I agree with 27/8
Closed by @still scarab
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi quick question why are the 5 triangles equal to 180 are there not 180 degrees in each triangle
or i just heard thinfs ewrong
All triangles should have 180 degrees interior angles
yeah but like in a certain video i was watching it said all 5 triangles in the star ewual to 180
wait let me rewatcu it again
there are no triangles in that star
yyyyyesssss i think
nevermind i got it i hust needed a nap
.close
Closed by @supple iron
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I tried setting f(x) = 0 and showing using a negative example that the solution is not unique but have failed with that
Here is what it says in the answers but I couldn't really understand this
@sterile wedge Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@sterile wedge Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @sterile wedge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Hold on
Oh hey
hey
.reopen
✅
Alright, so setting f(x) to 0 is correct
Because if u(x) and v(x) are both solutions of that ODE, then w(x) = u(x) - v(x) satisfy w'' + w' = 0
Amazingly, it's solvable
Do you know how to solve such ODE? w'' + w' = 0
yeah using the r^2 + r = 0
yes
so the homogenius solution is Ae^-x + B
alright
w'(0) = w(0) = 1/2 (w'(l) + w(l))
what does w'(0) = w(0) tell you about A and B
Not sure? It seems like useful for laplace transformation but nothing more
oh sorry
not sure what you mean here
Substitute x=0 to w(x) and w'(x)
no need for laplace
it means A + B = -A
yep
so -2A = B
We also have w(0) = 1/2 (w'(l) + w(l))
that would mean A + B = 1/2 (-Ae^-l + Ae^-l + B)
which then gives
A + B = 1/2(B)
Yes, which automatically holds due to this
so to verify the boundary condition
you only need B = -2A
is there a unique solution?
Yep, and therefore we have a 1-parametric family of solutions, instead of 1
yes given by A(e^(-x)-2)
yeah great I just probably did a miscalculation
Cause I already tried it and I got taht A != A some gibbrish like that
happens all the time
Closed by @sterile wedge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
you're welcome
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
beat me to it lmao
idk if this is allowed
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
difficult question man
it is not.
ok 🙂
for multiple reasons
we dont allow unsolicited ads and we dont allow opening help channels for non-help
ah okay
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I find out how many three digit numbers there are with their digits arranged in descending order?
It's wast no?
Just 3 digit do manually
assuming repetitions dont count as descending, you can just divide the total number of 3 digit numbers without repetition by 3!
@clever ore Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Does this look right? im new to factorization. I know that x-2 is a factor of P(x).
,rccw
ren
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
ikr :D
:D
wholesome
have a great day/night
you too man
.close
Closed by @ripe oar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
!15min
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
Sorry I forgot
Who called me here?
what does this mean?
So the picture is obviously a graph
And every graph obviously has a cycle
I mean not every graph
But generally
And a cycle is that you can start moving from one vertex of the graph
And you are able to return to that exact vertex
but what does "with only 10 vertexs" mean
It is possible to return to each vertex with only moving through ten vertexes
Ten moves basically
there are 10 vertices on the graph
And ?
are you asking for something different than a cycle in the graph
Prove that there's a cycle in this graph that you can achieve it with ten moves
Do you understand it now ?
do you have the original question
That's the original question
It's ok bro I'll do it myself lmao
😂😂
i do not believe the question was verbatim:
Prove that it has cycle with only 10 vertexs
Does this make any sense?
sure
this is 3 "moves" right?
1 - 2 - 3 - 1
in other words you want a length 10 cycle
Yeah
Yep
@full notch Has your question been resolved?
i don't think this has a length 10 cycle
Yep that's the point it doesn't have it lol
But we should prove that it doesn't have any
bruh why did you ask
Prove that it has cycle with only 10 vertexs
and then insist that was the original question
That's the question
You reach a point that you realise that it has none
.....
Then you gotta prove that it has none
you were asked to prove it has a length 10 cycle but really the writer's intention in asking that was for the students to realize that it doesn't have one and say the problem is erroneous and explain why rather than prove it has a length 10 cycle
Yeah lol
<@&286206848099549185>
Omg is there anybody here lol
Yes
pls help lol
prove that in a petersen graph
First, realise that if it has length ten, then it contains all vertices
we cant have a cycle with the lenght of 10
It is also known as a Hamiltonian cycle
Second, realise that it must start and end at the same point, hence among the five edges that join the inner and outer cycle only an even number of them can be included in the cycle
So now we have two cases: either two of those edges are included, or four are
why tho
Because if it's odd then you end in the other part
Each time you go through those edges you change from outside to inside
Or from inside to outside
oh daammmmm
i get it
If you have four, you can assume wlog that the missing edge is the one at the top and then easily chase which edges must / must not be in the cycle until you reach a contradiction
wlog ?
Without loss of generality
oh lol
but whats the contradiction ?
You have to "chase" which edges are in the cycle and which are not
That's a pretty standard procedure, have you never done anything similar?
like you mean brute force my way ?
No
You color for example green the edges that must be in the cycle and red those which must not be
oh
And then for example if a vertex has all edges red except for two, then those two must be green
nope ive never done smt like that
You use arguments like that one and at some point you obtain a vertex with too many red edges
Well, then you have to do it now for the first time
You begin with this
Now consider the edge at the top
The cycle must go through it, so it must have two green edges, one whe the cycle enters and another one where it leaves
Thus
oh thanks i get it
And that's the case where we have four edges
Of the ones between the two cycles
If we have two, I think you can do pretty much the same, but there is another argument
Since there are only two edges, the 10-cycle must enter the outer cycle, go through all five vertices, and then leave, as it won't return there
Hence, the first and last vertices must be adjacent
Same with the inner cycle
But you can't choose the two edges such that both pairs of end vertices are adjacent
@full notch Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @full notch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
guys how do I do the one above 6
nvm I got the answer 😅
kk
@vapid gyro Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @vapid gyro
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Find the extreme
values
of the function 𝑓(𝑥, 𝑦) = 4𝑥^2 + 10𝑦^2 subject to the
constraint
𝑥^2 + 𝑦^2
= 4.
Can someone solve this and let me know the solution I wanna check if I did it correct or not.
Have I made error in the partial derivatives?
Ur derivatives seem to be correct
I found lambda
Then substituted in the other equation to get y and then substituted in g(X,y) to find x
But I feel like it's wrong
Could U solve it for me and send the solution so I see if I did anything wrong.
x(4 - lambda) = 0
y(10 - lambda) = 0
are the equations u get by setting the partials equal to 0
So either x = 0, or lambda = 4
At the same time, either y = 0, and lambda = 10
What combination of these can happen at the same time
x =0 and y=0
Then that's ur answer
So no extreme points
Closed by @opal venture
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
you should already have the eigenvalues of A
and just like Trace(A) = sum of eigenvalues of A
you'll find that, since A^k has eigenvalues lambda^k, with lambda the eigenvalues of A
Trace(A^k) = sum of (eigenvalue)^k
Closed by @iron forum
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I want to kms
Oh dear
U cud probably try multiplying by the conjugate of the denominator first before differentiating
yea man wth you should've simplified 😭
How does it help
Still have to use quotient rule
And it makes it more complicated
If it was limit then sure but idk if rationalization will help
What does rationalising give u?
Numerator will be denominator whole square and denominator will be numerator whole square?
Ohh
(A-b)²/(a-b)²
No wtf am I on abou5
(numerator)/(a + b) = [numerator*(a - b)]/(a² - b²)
The conjugate of a + b is a - b
I asked u to multiply the top and the bottom by that
I've been doing long ass derivatives for the whole day I want to die
But u can't so that lmao
It's an angle
U can't simplify theta
It's taninverse ( theta)
Cant change it
Rught?
U can simplify theta
Does multiplying theta by 1 change theta?
Theta = theta*1
1 = (a-b)/(a-b)
@upbeat pike Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how can I find the closest point in the line from (-3, 3)
I need to find (x, y)
you have the equation of the line right
Closed by @livid trellis
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help
I think I see a triangle forming
i got it now
lol
I mean
if you think about it
they don't want you to use formulas
so intuitively
i don't know if it can be done that way
i was just kidding in reference to a message you sent in another channel
yea i understood that
if you take two points of a parallelogram and then take a third, the difference from that third to the closest is equal to the difference of the fourth to the second point
it said without calculating the distance
I mean
what distance formula exactly does it refer to
I just want to subtract pairs of points
and check it works out
challenge: give me the $\frac{y_2-y_1}{x_2-x_1}$ for every pair of 2 points
оωo
like subtract point 1 from 2 and that should be equal or sign flipped equal to point 3 from 4
and same with 1 and 3, 2 and 4
this formula has to be applied
its not distance, just vectors
.close
Closed by @smoky finch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
here: we can clearly see the 2 pairs of parallel lines
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi can someone help me with this
Because the left side equals to the right sudd
What I would do is put them beside each other like I typed out
And try to single out n on one side
Because the bases equal the same as well sooo
7
i would expand the brackets
How
laws of indices
uhhh idk how to use the bot to get it up
ill send you an image
oh shoot hold up
so use the bottom left one
and then use logs
yeah add the like termzies
shoot what do you do next 😭
you dont get to cancel out the 3 right?
do you subtract
YES
divide
so you do (3^21n)/
oh shoot you ant
cant
OH OH
TAKE LOGS OF BOTH SIDES
i just took over this mans chat
i was interested in the questions
yeah you can uhh
DAMMIT
you can uhhhhhh
since the bases are the same
you can set the exponents equal
then just do
21n=16n-11
and then just solve for n
so 5n =-11
yeah i got it
it should be divdes no
(3^7n)^3
nope
cause its (3^7n)^3
and so
you multiply
7n by 3
to get 21n
do you get it ?
yeah i kind of get it
good :]
i wish i knew the logs technique tho
taf do u know how to rationalize the denominator
yes
please help me
whats the question
@torpid solstice Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi could someone explain System of equations?
you are supposed to learn it from book... perhaps we can help you here to understand some specific part that you couldn't figure out
well yea i skipped 8th grade and messed up. now i need it and its hard. anyways the part im struggling with the most is after i understand what x stands for. Example
2x+3y=6
x-y=1
X=Y-1
i usually mess up after this part
you know x is y-1
so you replace x with y-1
in the first equation
and you obtain an equation where only y appears
2(Y+1)+3y=6 ?
@tough mist Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @tough mist
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
the question is on samping distribution and chi square distribution
I'm struggling to understand the answer
so the probability of the chi squared being over 7.841 is 0.25, why is that not unusual?
@hazy dawn Has your question been resolved?
@hazy dawn Has your question been resolved?
I suppose it depends on interpretation, but that's 1 over 4 tests getting that result, if the company runs a lot of tests(and it probably does) that could just be bad luck. At least on my stats class we usually considered something unusual when its below 5%
yeah, I think the most common significance is 95%
I could be wrong though
did you professor ever mention what's the "default" significance they will use?
0.05
oh that's just because to calculate P(X > k) if X is not the normal distribution with average 1 and stdev 1 then you have to do some scaling to get there
I see
you use $P(Z > \frac{k - \mu} \sigma)$
Sires
here sigma is 1 so you just look up the difference to the average
isn't that the error? or am I confounding the terms
oh yeah I'm mixing it up
but yeah, if he said 0.05 and its 0.25 then its way above the threshold of unusual
np
.close
Closed by @hazy dawn
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i have a question
i made this plot of the gamma function using matplotlib, is it mormal that the phase abruptly goes from -π to π in some places?
@open peak Has your question been resolved?
@open peak Has your question been resolved?
can you show the code? might try it on matlab or py
@open peak Has your question been resolved?
No
It's not normal to have discontinuities in a continuous function.
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I do these
<@&286206848099549185>
what have you tried
Rationalize the denominatior
and what questions
I don’t know how to do it
I was out the day she taught it 😭😭😭
how would you simplify 1/sqrt 2
What
ok
so if I told you to simplify 1/sqrt 2, how would you di t?
*do it?
no it's just an example
It's an example
Oh
2 ^-1?
Oh
1/sqrt 2 *(sqrt2/sqrt2)= (sqrt 2)/ 2
You see the 1/√2 and √2/2 are the same
I guess-
Check it
or mutliply the denomiator by a square root value that makes it a whole number
@humble comet
do you want to explain it or should I
You do bro
alr
now
I'm not good at teaching
lets take your problem
Walk me through this step by step as blatantly as you can
6/(-6-5sqrt6)
I’m autistic and it’s most likely the only way I will understand what you’re explaining
we know that
🧍🏻 how-
Yes
so, how do you think we should do this
Well my teacher said multiply by the inverse
yes
Idk what that is tho
do you know the difference of squares
I think..?
Uh..I don’t think that’s how she did it-
this is perfect for eliminating both sides because it makes both squares
let me finish first
I have an example of hers if you’d like-?
so
Ok-
we have -6-5sqrt6
Yeah
Sure-
that means that the (a+b) part is -6 + 5sqrt6
because it is +b
but it also means we have to multiply the numerator by -6+5sqrt6 for the expression to be equal.
6/(-6-5sqrt6) * (-6+5sqrt6)/(-6+5sqrt6)
is
equal to the original expression
Ok..
multiplying it ut
6(-6+5sqrt6)/(-6+5sqrt6)(-6-5sqrt6)
now apply difference of squares to the denominator
Ok..
Please
which one
Do it with me
ok
so we know that (a+b)(a-b) = a^2-b^2
we have a as -6 and b as 5sqrt6 from above
so
that expression is equivalent to
(-6)^2-(5sqrt6)^2
that is equal to
36- 150
or -124
Ok- now do you want me to show you how she did it or..?
sure
so 6*(6+5sqrt6)/-124
or 5+sqrt6/-24
Oh wait the whole thing is negative
so final answer -5-5sqrt6/24
yes that's understandable
do you understand now?
Ok hold on let me put this on paper
alr ping me when ur done
Right so like that
Then I multiply..something on the bottom
The notes are unclear
And multiply everything on top
Top and bottom..?
-6(-6+5sqrt6)/(6-5sqrt6)(6+5sqrt6)
Huh..
...
you multiply the original thing by 6-5sqrt6/6-5sqrt6
So both of the bottoms-
no the numerator and denominator
But they’re both the same?
yes
but we need them to rationalize the denominator
Ok-
Sorry
can you explain why we should multiply by the reciprocal thingy to itself
to make the denominator rational
Yeah you dont want irrational numbers to be in the denominator
it's fine I was like this at one poin
milo doesn't quite understand why though
just explain the little bit about why
Actually we do rationalize to make the equation look simple
Mhmm
Do I just treat the square root like a variable-
@pallid atlas what you don't understand?
What am I multiplying
Actually you're not solving the problem, you just simplify it
Well
And do I treat the square root like a variable
Wym?
My example doesn’t have 3 numbers so I’m a lil confused on what to do with 3 numbers
Send the problem
17?
You're approach is right go ahead bro
What am I multiplying 😭😭😭
(-6+5√6)/(-6+5√6)
Well
Use this formula
For denominator
(A+b) (a-b) =a^2-b^2
Well you see it's clearly in this form
Uh..sure
Well in the numerator you should have to multiply
Just 6 • -6 -5 square root 6
Yeah for the numerator
Does the square root act like a variable or no?
Wym give an example bro
Like does it stay the same but the 5 gets multiplied
Yeah yeah
Yeah
Use this formula
I think my teacher said there was a sort of shortcut but idk if it applies with 3 terms
She said just…multiply like that-
That's what the shortcut I'm talking about
(6*6) -(5.5.6)
What is the second one-?
Second one?
The second parentheses
You can see it clearly in the formula (a+b). (A-b) =a^2-b2
So
B=5√6
What would it become if you square it
(5√6) ^2
It's a typo
It's 36 and 25.6
You didn't apply the square for √6
I'll be back in 10 minutes
Ok
Not yet
I was using the bathroom 🧍🏻
So 36 25sqrt6
That can’t be the answer tho right..?
how did ug et that
ur multiplying by the conjugate
nvm in looking at the wrong problem
???
u didnt square this properly
the deominator?
denominator?
u multiply (-6-5sqrt6) by its conjugate (-6+5sqrt6)
which gets u -144
36-(25*6)
RHATS WHAT I FHOUGHT
I already did the top
okay nice
36 + 30sqrt6/-144
pretty sure the + is a -
?
36 - 30
Ohhhhh
cuz -6(5sqrt6)
Closed by @pallid atlas
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
free body diagram then analyse the forces
@crude sable Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @crude sable
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
The angle doesn't seem to be 90
ah, then I am right
U can use the angle tool in geogebra to actually measure the angle if u want
@lone lagoon Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello! does anyone know the overall parent functions I need to know to solve exponential and logarithmic functions? this one is apparently exponential decay but it would really help me out if someone could provide the parent functions to remember. i have a test tmrrow and im trying to cram
update; the HA is now y=2
i’m trying to solve for the y intercept as that will get me extra credit now
y intercept is when x=0
yeah but the exponential rules is screwing me up
so 1/4^-1??
i’m not sure how to solve that
when u have a negative exponent just find the inverse
so u could do 1/(1/4) which is just 4
then plus 2
ohhh crap i really have to remember the properties
by any chance do you know the overall parent functions i have to know?
i know 2^x is one
just know how an exponential function would look like
and generally how logs look like
but this one is supposedly exponential decay, do i have to remember that one too?
its just an exponential function but decreases
well u can know its decay since it’s a fraction to the exponent
no matter what u do, it’s gonna get smaller
u can plug in values of x to see if it’s decreasing or increasing and check ur work that way
i believe so
domain for exponentials is mostly always all real numbers right?
i see, thank you so much
perfect, i appreciate it lots
the origin would move to (1,3) right?
i tried graphing it and this is what it looks like for me, is that correct?
and the range is from (2, positive infinity) ?
graph looks right
thank u
i’m confused on how to get from step three to step 4
i understand why we keep the same base
but what happened to the 4x
and where did the 3x come from
and why does the 9 now have no x
😅
oh gosh i think i may have written it wrong
okay i tried fixing it, now im confused on why the exponent for 3 is a -2
on step 4
oh I see
like how did i get from (1/3)^2 to (3)^-2
they are the same thing
yes
ohhhh
that makes sense
so then step for step number 4, it would be 3^ 9+x instead?
yes
thank you :( you guys are seriously being life savers rn, it takes me a tad bit longer to learn stuff because i constantly need to ask questions
i appreciate it
nw
is this correct? it’s the same exercise i just want to make sure i didn’t mess it up
check the signs in ur exponent when u combine them in ur fourth step
step 4 is wrong
got it! just fixed that
thank u
also i haven’t gotten to question 8 or 9 yet but when do i know when i have to check for the answer?
when ur answer feels wrong?
oh i just remembered my professor saying that there was a specific thing that we would have to check obligatory, and others not rlly nvm
on this exercise, i’m confused to why it’s vertical shift up by 2
u can write it as -ln(x+4) + 2
and what would a horizontal reflection look like instead in a logarithmic function?
oh okay so he just wrote it in a confusing way for no reason 🥲 ty
reflect along x axis
separate and put to e^
like this?
okay the problem might be that i’m quite unfamiliar with log rules, it’s been a while since i’ve seen them in hs 🥲 imma try it out
$a^{\log_a (k)}=k$
pppoopoo
instead of a u use e
would this be correct?
no
i meant + ln(x+4) to left side lol
-2 also works its just that i don't like to see negative numbers lol
so its personal preference i guess
me neither i think i get what u mean
Hello Everyone ✋
Any experienced Mathematician here ?
hi, plz go open ur own channel, this channel is occupied
but i’m trying to isolate for x right?
yes
but it has to be e^(x+4)
idk if i did that right
good question, i thought it reminded me of the exponential property
i mean e^2 - 4 = x is the answer, but what u did was wrong
how can i get to e^2 then?
so it was ln(x+4) = 2
you can rewrite it into e^ln(x+4) = e^2
and use log rules to get rid of the ln
so it would just be x+4 = e^2
ohhhh i think i get it
thank you tor your help, i’m gonna try to get 3 hours of sleep and then go back to the grind i appreciate it
@misty gazelle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
this is what i have so far, im pretty sure i’m supposed to use lagrange multipliers but tbh i’m not sure on how to solve the system of equations or if this is the right technique to even use
@quiet storm Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185> help a brotha out with calc 3 hw
@quiet storm Has your question been resolved?
i think ur system looks correct
i’m not quite sure how to solve it though
well $2x-3\lambda x^2y^2z=x(2-3\lambda xy^2z)=0$
SilverSoldier
x = 0, or the other thing is 0
do the same thing with the other equations
see which combination of results works together
u also need x^3 * y^2 * z = 1 to hold
so for example u can immediately reject x = 0 as a solution
i see, i will try in a moment
sorry, a little all over the place,
but instead of setting them equal to 0, i set them equal to lambda and tried my best to solve y and z in terms of x to put in the constraint equation
ended up getting 4 points and the numbers r hideous
@quiet storm Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @quiet storm
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hey
@manic nova Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @manic nova
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Could someone talk me through the steps for this question please?
Its been a long time since i last did histograms and am unsure how i would go about this question
so in a histogram, the bars touch
each bar will just be labeled as the sales revenue for each range
and their heights will be the frequency
Oh... i was putting the heights as the frequency density
Something like that, just without fd on y axis?
yes perfect
thanks eve
How would one go about finding the fd from the histogram?
theoretically it should look the same when u change it to frequency density since it’s the same thing
oh ok
lowkey idk
i believe it’s the frequency divided by the “width” aka the range for each bar
to make it look neater, might i put on the x axis "Class width $1000's"
so for the first one, it’s 4/5
Oh, yeah that makes sense
Okie, tysm!
i been having a mini heart attack everytime i get a different looking histogram
ur lucky to be able to do it digitally
cuz on paper my bars always end up crooked and ugly 😭😭
teacher doesnt like having to read our handwriting, made us do it using word and excel 😢
it is much faster than digital though
