#help-13
1 messages · Page 328 of 1
Result:
96.610169491525
then
x = vot + 1/2at^2
and you’re solving the quadratic
1/2at^2 + vot - x = 0
solve for t
you’re welcome
@odd sierra Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I do this problem for precalc
Do you know what causes a "hole "
No
Just at the bottom
oh okay
It must not necessarily be on top too
No it’s just the both yea
To be clear by hole you mean where it is not continuous?
no removable discontiny
Oh ok
Then factor the bottom
Then use the remainder theorem to find which factor of the bottom is a factor on the top
@merry basalt
.close
Closed by @merry basalt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why is this so hard
@chilly portal Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @chilly portal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Teacher did this in class, I'm trying to understand why he pulled those numbers specifically to multiply on each side
I don't understand what that symbol is
is it 2r?
or is it 2 multiplied
oh okay I understand
He didn't really pull any numbers
So, to be able to add these two terms together, they have to have the same values in the denominator
So the trick he uses is that he multiplies the values with 1
If you look, he multiplied with 2b both on the numerator and denominator
and 2b/2b is 1
but that way he can rearrange so that on the bottom he gets 20(a^2)(b^2)
oh i just noticed
yeah tysm
i understand it now
And then on the other one he does the same, but with 5 instead
He wanted the denominator to be the same like you said
Ya
yuh i get it now tysm
And you can always utilise this trick
😭
yeah
haha happens, it was weird
he seperated the b and 2
instead of writing 2b
and put them each on seperate side
I know how to mulitply and divide Rational Expressions easily
addition was a little weird but i get it now
Methods are different
Ya, addition the denominator always has to be the same
Hence why you need to play around with the equations a bit
i might aswell ask, wb substracting?
Ah ok
Then you just substract the numerators
thanks a lot, i appreciate the help
.close
Closed by @naive hill
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do you do this? I even asked a Math AI and it said none of the answers are correct
use the fact that sec is 1/cos
yeah same thing
arcsec ≠ 1/sec
when did i say that?
I tried to do implicit but I don't think I did it right
I think the question is just absolutely horrible
I tried using the derivative of arcsec I memorized but that didn't help much either
Use that d/dx sec = secx tanx
Then you can sub in y, for the secy term. This won’t work well for tany though so you need to use another identity
@drowsy rock Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @drowsy rock
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm not sure whether this matrix represents the two matrix the question presented
also the entries for the fist matrix seems to be unclear, because $T(v_k) \neq v_k ?$
eurgene114514
@mighty summit Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @mighty summit
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, I’m working on calc hw and could use a sanity check because I just fat-fingered my way onto the “right” answer and now I’m confused. I thought the answer should be -e^22+4, not 44? Can someone provide a second pair of eyes? 😅
Like…I’ll take the point on my homework, but…it’s hurting my brain lol
Ok, so my math was good. Maybe the person who programmed the homework made the exact same keyboard fumble I did.
Thanks for confirming I’m not crazy lol
.close
Closed by @trail agate
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@twin dune Has your question been resolved?
@twin dune Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how would i evaluate this to change base?
∛3x × 81^(x-4) = ∛9⁶
4.6 is not an exact value
fraction
tysm !
okayz
2more questions
Q2
I'm struggling to understand how it's a
tbh I didn't understand how I got b either
I tried making it into log form
b = Log 2a C
but still confused
i think ur right tbh
with b?
wait I think I read it wrong
d is correct answer
😭😭 still dk how
okayz I got that one
nvm
ahaha
last one
<@&286206848099549185> sorry to ping but I'd like guidance
@wet warren Has your question been resolved?
Maybe this would be helpful? I've never had to really deal with base 2 logarithms in mathematics but this came up
And then these
Well I tried to change it to exponential form before asking here
ik how to change it but in that example there's only 3 variables
in my example there's 4 if it makes sense
So you have an extra equation?
extra exponent that I've not had experience with
An extra variable means you are just going to rearrange the same expression but in a way to find the extra variable
usually as an example it'd be like 5³ = c or so which is ez to transform
but I have no experience w 5³ = c²
yk
idk where to make room for it
Also, btw that example is already in exponential form. You should try changing it to logarithm form.
yesyes it'd be log 5 n = 3
but idk how to convert with the extra ^2
So is this the question you are trying to solve rn?
Or is this a different question?
So you got:
log2(5^m) = 3m-1?
I actually don't remember what my attempts were
its packed away but I thibk that seems correct
Okay, so after log2(5^m) = 3m-1, what do you think you should do next?
Wait, are you sure this is what you got? I might've made a mistake.
Do you have the equation to transform exponent to logarithm?
not sure as it's away rn
I haven't made a full attempt at the question anyways I struggled at the first step
the only equation we have is the first image u sent
Okay, let's just go with it being correct because I did some further research and found this:
So, what do you need to first do to isolate the m?
log2(5^m) = 3m-1?
don't forget that u can use this to ur advantage
yesyes js give me a sec I'll try pitting it into log form as well
I got
(3m - 1 ) Log 5 2 = m
log5?
Can you show me your steps?
So it seems like we maybe got the wrong form from the get go.
The formula above is right. But is it 5^m or is it 2^m?
This is the problem we are doing, right?
2^3m-1 = 5^m
We are trying to write this as m = 1/(a-log2(c)), now do you think we should do the conversion into logarithm from 5^m side or 2^3m-1 side?
If we convert into log from 5^m side, what do we get as a result? Write it out.
I see where we got confused
okay
what result do u want?
I've gotten (3m -1 ) Log 5 2 so far
Is that 3m-1 = log5(2)?
it's basically Log 5 2^3m-1 = m
Mhmm, that is correct conversion. But, in the form m = 1/(a-log2(c)), do we see a log5?
mhmm, looks good. Now let's simplify further to solve for a and c
ik those rules but I don't think it'll be useful in this
Why do you think that?
I've used it before and it's for expanding
but there's nothing to expand here
example
Yes, but if u expand, it can help you simplify at times.
If we had Log 2 (3)(4) then we can expand it to Log 2 3 + Log 2 4
but there's nothing multiplying or dividng
wym repost?
Can you reiterate at what point our equation is
okay
Like, we just converted from exponent to logarithm, can you show that
The logarithm form
like explain how we got this ?
I just meant like repost it
ah
Okay, so we got log2(5^m) = 3m-1.
Now, how can this help us get closer to m = 1/(a-log2(c))?
Why do you think that?
3m -1 isn't in log form
when we did it both shpuld end up having a log
like what u do to one side of the = u do to the other
Let's relook at this
Okay.
Hmmm, okay, but this is incorrect logarithm form
Exponent form is:
2^(3m-1) = 5^m
Now, if we look at exponent form, what is K and what is N?
.
this log form is used when exponential form only had one exponent not including the one over n
wait just lemme cook a bit
This isn't a matter of algebra but more so following the equation/rule we have
Where does it say that the log form is only used when there is one exponent on one side and not the other? That's not what the rule is saying. It just says if you have 2^K = N, then you can rewrite that as log2(N) = K.
It doesn't matter what K and N are, those are variables. It's just relevant to your equation.
I'm just saying as past experience working with these logs
I'm super close to solving it
idk how to explain it but it's a process I've gone over before
the issue was the logs in the beginning but when I distributed it on both sides it started working out
I just have to change the 2/5
ah thank you so much for the help !
I got it solved
Well, this is in the incorrect form to begin with. You are solving the wrong question from the beginning. This is what you are solving right now:
2^(Log(5^m)) = 3m-1
Because, you've set K = Log(5^m) and N = 3m-1
🙏🏽
altho u did get the right answer somehow 🤔 That's so weird lol
ahaha if it ain't broken don't fix it ig 😭
Here, I think this is how u solve it
move m to the outside of log2(5^m) because of the logarithm rules. The rest is just distribution and factoring and rearranging
😋😋🙏🏽 ty for the help I'll try figuring it out ur way too
Just giving u this ahead of time in-case ur teacher gives u shit for that other work lol
I'm glad it worked out still, idk how it worked out but the start looked shaky ngl
Closed by @wet warren
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
I just realized your algebra is wrong
Log2() / 3(Log2() - Log2(5))
The Log2s can't cancel each other out
why not
That is 3(Log2) - 3Log2(5), you can't cancel one out with the numerator because it's not like the entire denominator is being multiplied by Log2.
😔 yikes
Like:
a / (b+c), you can't just say if let's say b = a, you can't do 1 / c. That's not right lol.
I'll try ur way in the morning then
After I sleep maybe a fresh set of eyes will help
😭 I think it's too late for me to think properly
Sounds good, I think it was the incorrect form from the get-go, hope u feel better tomorrow lol
I feel that 😭
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone explain quotient groups to me? i don't quite get how they work.
@hot crag
- Consider a subgroup H in a group G. If we multiply H by some elements of g on the left, we will either get H or a set gH that doesn't intersect with H.
Similarly, we can multiply by g on the right
then surely you know quotient rings?
mhm
take just the additive part of that
okay
thats a quotient group
as in
If we now consider the set of those non-overlapping subsets of G, we may want to endow it with a group structure
The most natural way would be to inherit the group operation of G somehow
In each of H, g1 H, g2 H, ... we can choose one element and say that (g1 H)*(g2 H) = (g1 g2 H)
We now want to prove that this operation doesn't depend on the choice of g1 and g2.
In order for this idea to work we have to ask for gH=Hg
yes i do get the bit about the quotient ring having the cosets of H as elements
as in forget that the multiplication exists
uhmmmmmmm
okay
what i don't get is how H is the identity
in what sense is it the identity?
in the quotient ring the coset 0+H is the identity of addition
denascite btw can you explain further? the way i'm used to thinking of quotient rings is essentially remainders
and i don't quite get how those'd work in groups
well it doesnt quite work
oh.
I mean remainders also only work in like integers or polynomials
hm
Think of it as of cutting the group into many pieces
hm okay
Each piece is similar to the subgroup H
And the operation on those pieces is naturally inherited from G
.
yeah i got that bit
if we quotient by an ideal H, then two elements x,y are equivalent if x-y is in H. in practice for you thats often that y is the remainder when x is divided by whatever generated H
sorry if i'm not being descriptive
i'm trying to figure out what exactly my problem is too
mhm
if you write that condition multiplicatively then you would have xy^-1 in H. which you should recognise
yeah
oh i think i might be getting it
so essentially when i quotient by a group G, all elements of G are essentially made identities?
that makes sense
sort of
what
when you quotient by an ideal such as <p>, you say that elements are the same "up to multiples of p"
yeah...
in other words, up to addition of an element in <p>
or in multiplicative group speak, up to multiplication of an element in H
*head spins*
hang on lemme try to make sense of this
so for xy in G/H, xy = e if xy is in H?
essentially
you are messing up what type of things the elements of G/H are
that certainly doesnt help
sorry
:(
i think i'll go watch a youtube video instead
i think what's mainly confusing me is that the elements of a quotient ring are going to be the same as the parent ring; not the case w/ quotient groups
no no
the elements of a quotient ring are also cosets
often also called residue classes or something
written as [f] or \overline f or f+H or something if you want to be precise with your notation
yeah no i feel like i have no idea what i'm confused about. just that i am
lemme go watch a video and come back
.close
Closed by @hot crag
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How can I prove it
My process was naming the radii
OB and OD and OP all =1 then I just couldn’t think of a way for it
If you want a hint ||inscribed angle theorem||
try to represent the tan (theta/2) in terms of the sides in this diagram
In fact you can try writing all the sin, cos, tan mentioned in the formula in terms of the lengths of relevant sides in this diagram
OB and BP ?
thats because you have this down wrong
Can you write the basic definition of sin here?
as in ratio of what sides?

Cuz I thought y=sinθ so used that without thinking
Closed by @oblique flare
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
so far with 7a) thingking about the left most side if i place a left slanted tile i get Fn-1 but when it comes to the other two oreinetations i do not know what to do
@calm depot Has your question been resolved?
i have been told that it is a recursion which gives the answer as the sum from 1 to n
uh do they mean F1 = 5
F1 = 3 as in the number of certain tiling combinations possible
oh ok yes I see it
@calm depot Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I stuck at b
do you have any thoughts?
@fossil berry Has your question been resolved?
I have zero thoughts
see if you can construct even one injective function
let's say you start with f(1) = A
now there are two possibilities for f(2) because it can't be A
either f(2) = B or f(2) = C
say you chose f(2) = B
then f(3) has to be what
Can you please first explain what injective and surjective means. I read the definition but still didnt get it
injective is the same as one to one
the function can't assign the same "output" to two different "inputs"
so you can't have say, f(1) = A and f(2) = A
A can only appear once
surjective means that all three of A,B,C are used as outputs
so for example:
f(1) = A and f(2) = A and f(3) = B and f(4) = B and f(5) = B is not surjective because it doesn't send any input to C
whereas:
f(1) = A and f(2) = A and f(3) = B and f(4) = C and f(5) = B
is surjective
because A, B and C all show up as output values
So surjective means every element in Y have have something
every element in Y is equal to f(x) for some x in X
in words, every element in Y is the output for some input
in fact i cannot
it's impossible when there are more input values than output values
Why
you have five inputs
Why it need to be equal
and they all need to be assigned to different outputs
so you need at least five output values available
Can you get another example apart from the current problem
sure
if X = {1,2,3,4,5} and Y = {A,B,C,D,E,F,G}
then there are multiple solutions
for example,
f(1) = A, f(2) = B, f(3) = D, f(4) = F, f(5) = G
A,B,D,F,G are all different
so f is injective
How do you calculate that
wdym by calculate
I mean count the injective functions
to specify a function i just need to tell you what the output value is for each input
oh to count
well you can argue as follows
f(1) can be anything so 7 possibilities for f(1) (any of A,B,C,D,E,F,G)
then f(2) has 6 possibilities, it can't reuse the value you assigned to f(1)
f(3) has 5 possibilities
f(4) has 4 possibilities
f(5) has 3
so in total:
7x6x5x4x3
nice
just gonna recopy it here for reference
ok first of all, can you give an example of a surjective function
for this X and Y
just to make sure you understand it
Sorry. We havent had a lecture about this topic but our homework from seminar was this
f(1)->A , f(2) -> B, f(3) -> C
I just have to use all A B C right?
f(4)-> A , f(5) -> A
@flint plinth
@fossil berry Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @fossil berry
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why does my method not match da quadratic formula?
it does
sqrt(16)=4
(-2 pm 4)/6=(-1 pm 2)/3
your answer is
(-1 pm sqrt(4))/3=(-1 pm 2)/3
same thing
Sqrt(16) is 4, but da sqrt(4) is not da sqrt(16) doe
Calculate da numerator, mine gives you 1, the other gives you 2
i just showed you how theyre the same thing
Oh my bad, ok I understand but I don't understand the sqrt(16) how it balances out w/ da sqrt(4)
youre just looking at the numerator, not the whole fraction
the whole reason theyre the same is because they simplify
I put in da lowest form, n that one is just a step above lowest form yeah?
Ohhhhh okay okay
I get it
Thank you bro
One more question tho, why doesn't the quadratic formula give da lowest form?
it would, you just didnt put it into its simplest form
I se
the quadratic formula gives an answer, but any form fitting has to be done manually
Closed by @trail dune
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i dont even understand what that third step wants
never seen it written like that
work^
.close
Closed by @pliant fulcrum
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
need help understanding
how this simplifies
expand out the entire expression at the start and you can rewrite to get what you see on the bottom
@cerulean sail

sigma^2 + Npsigma^2 - psigma^2 / N
Which is like
I'm not sure how the middle n drops out
Unless it just does since N/N=1
yes
It's just weird that the ^1 dies and then the ^2 also dies when reduced
So the left right n cancel but then the middle n also cancels
Whatever
@austere brook Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @austere brook
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help with this question
State whether it is True or False. If True then give a proof. If False then give a counterexample.
I feel like this is false based on contrapositive: "If sqrt(x) is rational, then x is rational"
Wot
that's not a counterexample to the contrapositive
What are you providing with the counter example
what is sqrt(pi)
I can still give counter example with this? If sqrt(x) is rational, then x is rational
p -> q has equality with ~q -> ~p
if sqrt(x) = a/b with a,b integers, then can you express x as a ratio of integers?
1.7724538509
in terms of an integer over another integer
( 1.7724538509 ... ) / 1
its irrational
do u know what is an integer
1.7724538509..., my favorite integer
what is your train of thought with what u are doing anyway
i'd recommend considering this question
this is the contrapositive yes and
it says for all
i gotta show all irrational numbers?
you have to prove it for all irrational numbers, u cant pick a specific example
u were saying about the contrapositive
i can prove with this?
If sqrt(x) is rational, then x is rational
am I on the right track here?
What is the question 💀
u have to show its true for all x
only Nitro subscribers can see it
u shouldnt be using exists here..
You could assume √x is rational, then we know rational times rational is rational and so x is rational. But it's not so hence proved
proof is annoying
i dont get how u got that sqrtR=R nor how it is relevant
i'm just grasping at straws here, i really have no clue where to start with the proof
without using an example, that's not good enough
what is a rational number
1,2,3,4
Did you read my answer?
ya but you said "not so hence proved"
what is the definition
definition
See to prove that √x is irrational, we start by letting √x be a rational number and we prove THAT wrong. And hence come to conclusion that it is irrational
a rational number is a number that can be expressed as the quotient or fraction p/q of two integers, a numerator p and a non-zero denominator q.
thank you
so now suppose that sqrt x is rational
what equation can u write from this
getting closer?
or should i use R, not Z
i said suppose that sqrt x is rational
my definition says integers but the question says real
POKÉDANCE
yes x can be any real number
and we are trying to show the contrapositive statement which states
if sqrt x is irrational then x is rational
like this?
(a/b)^2
and is that rational?
yes
so the contrapositive is true
and what does that say about the original statement
is this fine? should say *contrapositive for last word, Goodnotes still catching up to syncing at screenshot
its fine except that statement where u said the contrapositive statement
maybe say the contrapositive is...
because it seems as though you are just stating the contrapositive as true
other than that its fine
this a bit better?
i mean at your third line
add something like
contrapositive:
this is equivalent to...
or something that denotes it is something you are trying to show rather than it being already true
we want to show..
@marsh pond Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone help me with this have no idea where to start
I think I could make a variable a = x/t
Don’t know what to do about the square root divided by t
I think if I could get rid of the x the rest of the problem will be straight forward
The x is in the radical being divided by t
@late rapids Has your question been resolved?
@late rapids Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @late rapids
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
where exactly do i go from here?
@polar marsh Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@polar marsh Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @polar marsh
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
which
where?
Do you want to know how the M is positive instead of negative?
if so it's just the distributive property
that would just be the distribution of the -1, if that's what you're asking
Closed by @high plume
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
np
happy cat :]
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
aaa
<@&286206848099549185> idk how to start or do this its been 1 day
Ok I think I have an idea
Let UP=x and RQ=y
Total fencing used is 4y-2x=30
Total area=y^2-x^2
so it is maximizing y^2-x^2
Hmmmm
Actually no let me take a different approach
Let QP=x
2y+2x=30
And it is maximizing 2xy-x^2
So from equation 1
There is y+x=15
Thus y=15-x
Substitute that into equation 2
You get
2x(15-x)-x^2
30x-3x^2
Now it is completing the square
-3(x^2-10x)
-3(x^2-10x+25) +75
-3(x-5)^2+75
So when x=5, the area is maxed
The dimension will be PQ=5, QR=10,RS=10 ST=5,TU=5,UP=5
There solved
so the area of the thing is
You can see the area of the thing
two rectangles of lengths x and y with an extra square of length x
This it is xy +xy-xx
2xy-x^2
I need to go to sleep in 5 minutes so if you have question quick
@tepid delta Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @tepid delta
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i got ||13|| as the answer because the only time the roots r integers is when its factorable(?)
so i assumed p and q would be 3 and 2 respectively
but is there any other way to get that
yeah, prime number q would have 2 factors q and 1
p and q are prime numbers means that the product of roots is a prime number. That means that the roots have to be +/- 1 and +/- q
1 is not a prime
mistype
yea
p and q are 2 and 3
.close
Closed by @maiden fractal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
BhokTjiang
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
BhokTjiang
@calm yew Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@calm yew Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, I am learning math from scratch because I’ve never been good at it. I failed and barely managed to pass using grace marks. I am watching Organic Chemistry Tutor videos for pre-algebra, and in one of the videos, he talks about PEMDAS. I began to understand the priority of order of operations, but then I got confused. He mentioned that multiplication and division have the same priority, and you should solve them from left to right to get the correct answer. However, in PEMDAS, it seems like multiplication (M) has more priority than division (D). Why is that? I’m very confused. Can anyone help me?
PEMDAS is just a general guide for beginners
In reality multiplication and division have the same priority
BODMAS is another one used
You should solve
Brackets
Multiplication and division
Addition and subtraction
no
PEMDAS should really be PE(MD)(AS) where the parts in parentheses have equal priority
Okay, so you mean multiplication and division (MD) have the same priority, while multiplication with addition or subtraction has a different priority? The same rule applies for division, right?
basically the priortity is:
- parentheses
- exponentiation
- multiplication and division
- addition and subtraction
going left-to-right on operations with equal priority
Okay understood 😊👌🏻
.close
Closed by @deep burrow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm unsure how to factor this polynomial
@candid finch Has your question been resolved?
Will someone help me?
Im really sorry for the late reply 😔😔
@candid finch
That's okay
So is it correct ?
Closed by @candid finch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, I need help proving the surjective part of this. I can't for the life of me figure out how to.
do you know the definition of surjective?
my understanding of it is that
every element of the codomain has a preimage in the domain
or, the range is equal to the codomain
yea good
so take an arbitrary element in the codomain
say (a,b)
can you always find an n such that (2n, n+3) = (a,b)?
depends
do i declare an integer n?
are you proving that it is surjective or that it is not?
well
is it
i legit dont know
that's where i'm trying to lead you
worry about how to prove it after you work out whether it is or not
you need to find n such that (a,b) = (2n, n+1)
that's equivalent to two equations:
a = 2n
b = n+1
and you need to find an n that solves both
oh but i think it fails in a = 2n
since n = a/2
which isnt guaranteed integer
am i right
yep
oh ok so its not surjective
so good
now you know it's not surjective
the way to show it formally is to just show one counterexample
like a particular (a,b) that doesn't work
yw
.close
Closed by @drifting turtle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I've been doing this problem and I got stuck, I need help
,rotate
@blazing carbon Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
btw all A's in the picture are the same thing
Can i just say that ${x} \subseteq \mathbb{R}$ ?
ω
@blazing carbon Has your question been resolved?
@blazing carbon Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @blazing carbon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@odd verge
Bro just do what he said
<@&268886789983436800>
k
Seems the situation is resolved?
Closed by @dire geode
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Aw dang it
Can you close this channel?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi
b) from A3
that 1/n ln
i have to calculate lim n -> infinity
ive taught of just applying Cezar Stolz but doesnt simplify
clustering criterion doesnt really work either
.close
Closed by @ocean idol
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
ok nvm chat gpt said bullshit
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
.close
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, i'm trying to understand, how we go from left to right? what does it mean to integrate d(sqrt(2+y)) ? and where did the 2 on the denominator go? Thanks
$d(f(y))$ is shorthand notation for $f'(y) \cdot \frac{dy}{dx}$
riemann
where f is explicitly a function of y
but y is a dummy variable anyway so it doesn't matter to integrals
$d(f) = f' dy$
riemann
,w diff sqrt(2+x)
riemann
Guys can I have any sources to take notes from and explains Algebra at an in-depth level along with practice questions. I know the basics I just want to get a refresher on Algebra 1 and master Algebra 2 and jump straight into solving polynomials, functions, precalculus, and all the bigger stuff.
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
i should just solve it normally instead of focusing on this weird notation
sure sounds reasonable
the point of the weird notation is to "undo" the integral
$\int d(f) = f$
riemann
physicists eat that shit up
Closed by @twilit plume
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help
In your head try rotating the triangle XYZ
Thought you want to solve but yea it is 2
The reason is what polygon is scale
Polygon 1 is scaled by 1/2 to become like polygon 2
is the scale factor 2 or 1/2 then
It is 1/2 from polygon 1 to polygon 2
I just read the question wrong
can you explain how it is 1/2
It states what is the scale factor of polygon 1 to polygon 2
So kp1=p2
You can see that in polygon 2, one of the sides is 15.
That 15 has to have a s.f with one of the sides
One of your sides is 30, 15 is half of 30
Now, you technically can't be 100% sure whether 15 was scaled from 30, so you try imagine what it would be like if it were half.
If it were half, then y would be 8, because half of 16 is 8, and x would be 17, because half of 34 is 17
Put it in your pythag formula a^2 + b^2 = c^2, and see if it works, if it does, then there you go, your s.f is 1/2
np
@arctic heart Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
could anyone please explain the steps to solve this problem I've been trying for 2 hours now and nothing seems to solve correctly
Liner algebra and gaussian elimination
how do I identify what to eliminate because I can't get the correct answer
You know gaussian elimination method right?
I know what it is but my professor didn't really explain it
so I know I can use it I just struggle to do so correctly
It is kinda complicated to explain it so what about a video on YouTube
This precalculus video tutorial provides a basic introduction into the gaussian elimination - a process that involves elementary row operations with 3x3 matrices which allows you to solve a system of linear equations with 3 variables. You need to convert the system of equations into an augmented matrix and use matrix row operations to write it ...
This might be good
It explains it for 3 variables but the concept can be applied to bigger or smaller grids
If you didn't like it you can check other videos too
ok thank you I'll look into it
@sly wyvern Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@exotic oracle Has your question been resolved?
show the entire question
@exotic oracle Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @exotic oracle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Prove:
$\forall k,l\in \mathbb{Z}^+$ the $kl$-th Fibonacci number $f_{kl}$ is
divisible by both $f_k$ and $f_l$.
hamr
I am thinking of a proof by induction for this one
what I like to do is think of the values mod f_k
f_0 is 0
f_k is 0
Try to show that f_k being 0 (mod f_k) basically "resets" the sequence
and so if you write k more terms you'll get another 0 (mod f_k)
Ok i will try this
i thought you were a random person
i am

@celest otter Has your question been resolved?
Ok this is kinda what I have so far,
Prove:
$\forall k,l\in \mathbb{Z}^+$ the $kl$-th Fibonacci number $f_{kl}$ is
divisible by both $f_k$ and $f_l$.
[\text{or}]
[
P(k) = \left(f_k | f_{kl}\right)
]
And we w.t.s that $P(k)$ holds true $\forall k\in \mathbb{Z}^+$. From
it is symmetrically true that $\forall l\in \mathbb{Z}^+, : f_l | f_{kl}$
\textbf{Base case($k=1$):}
[\begin{aligned}
f_1 &| f_{l}\Leftrightarrow 1 | f_{l}\
f_l &= \frac{f_l}{1}, : f_l \in \mathbb{Z}\
\end{aligned}]
Thus, $ | f_{l}$ is true.
\textbf{Inductive step($P(n)\Rightarrow P(n+1)$):} Now, assume that
$n$ is a positive integer such that $P(n)$ is true. (In the base case,
we have just seen that $n = 1$ is such an integer.) We will now show
that $P(n + 1)$ is true.
$Proof$: by hypothesis $P(n)$:
[
\forall n,l \in \mathbb{Z}^+, :\left(f_n | f_{ln}\right)
]
Using the assumption, for $P(n+1)$:
[
\forall n,l \in \mathbb{Z}^+, :\left(f_{(n+1)} | f_{l(n+1)}\right)
]
Rewriting $f_{l(n+1)}$:
[\begin{aligned}
f_{l(n+1)} &= f_{(ln+l)}\
&= f_{ln-1}f_{l} + f_{ln}f_{l+1}\
&=
\end{aligned}]
Rewriting $f_{(n+1)}$:
[\begin{aligned}
f_{(n+1)}&= f_{(n-1)}f_{1} + f_{n}f_{1+1}\
&= f_{(n-1)} + f_{n}
\end{aligned}]
hamr
@celest otter Has your question been resolved?
@celest otter Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
<@&286206848099549185>
<@&286206848099549185>
@celest otter Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185> pls

