#help-13
1 messages · Page 310 of 1
but either can be used
whats more important is
this formula is easier to use and is usually what you learn
but in matrix multiplication u cant just multiply two 2x3 matrices right, they need to be 2x3 and 3x2
yes
the * is dot product
the * does not mean matrix-multiply
matrix-multiply does not have a symbol
ive only done dot product when its like (1,2) dot (2,3)
does this extend to larger matrices as well
(1, 2) and (2, 3) are vectors
yeah
oh
u * u is between two vectors
nothing new is happening
oh wait
@chilly bolt I made a big mistake
u^T u is u * u
u u^T is something else entirely
lets say $u=\begin{bmatrix}1\2\3\end{bmatrix}$
mtt
so $u^T=\begin{bmatrix}1&2&3\end{bmatrix}$
mtt
now $u^Tu=\begin{bmatrix}1&2&3\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}1\2\3\end{bmatrix}=\begin{bmatrix}1\cdot1+2\cdot2+3\cdot3\end{bmatrix}$
mtt
when you matrix multiply u^T and u together, you get what is essentially a single number
that single number is the same thing as dot product: u * u
oh yeah they will be diff cause matrix multiplication isnt commutative
yea
,,\begin{bmatrix}1\2\3\end{bmatrix}\cdot\begin{bmatrix}1\2\3\end{bmatrix}=1\cdot1+2\cdot2+3\cdot3
mtt
so u^T u is u * u
compare this to doing u u^T instead
,,u;u^T=\begin{bmatrix}1\2\3\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}1&2&3\end{bmatrix}=\begin{bmatrix}1\cdot1&1\cdot2&1\cdot3\2\cdot1&2\cdot2&2\cdot3\3\cdot1&3\cdot2&3\cdot3\end{bmatrix}
mtt
you get a 3x3 matrix out of u u^T
for reasons you can ask me later, uu^T v = (u * v) u
uu^T is matrix multiplication
u^T v is also matrix multiplication
u * v is dot product, which gets you a number
(u * v) u is multiplying u by a scalar, which gets you a scaled version of u
ok
yeah
yeah
now I u on the left on both sides
u u^T v = u (u * v)
since theyre both equal, attempting to multiply them by u should also remain equal
on the left, u^T v is technically a 1x1 matrix, so multiplying by u gets you a 3x1 matrix
on the right, u * v is a number, so multiplying by u gets you a scaled version of u, also a 3x1 matrix
so u u^T v = u (u * v) in general
do you believe that
oh ok
yea
then u (u * v) = (u * v) u
(u * v) is a number so this is valid
u u^T v = (u u^T) v, so you can do the u u^T first
you get a matrix out of that
is this to do with assoicative property
yep
ok that makes sense
now what this all ends up meaning is
we have two different formulas that do the same calculation
weve shown that they are the same
however this is a number
and this is a matrix
ok
so the bottom one is a matrix way of doing proj_u(v)
uu^T / ||u||^2 is the matrix you multiply v by
is this projection of u onto v
you can think of it as u being what you base things off of
and v being some vector that could partly face parallel or perpendicular to u
proj_u(v) lets you see how "u-wise" v is
anything else?
nah all good
Closed by @upper laurel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I understand how it works for a single variable (one dimensional x and y) but I dont seem to understand how it translates to multiple dimensions, can someone explain the proof to me? and why the equality holds?
I especially dont understand this part
I get that probability density functions must be positive so we take the absolute value, but why do we take the determinant?
@fervent jackal Has your question been resolved?
Notice first that\
$F_{\mathbf{Y}}(\mathbf{y}) = P(Y_{1} \leq y_{1}, \hdots, Y_{n} \leq y_{n}) = P(g(X_{1}) \leq y_{1}, \hdots, g(X_{n}) \leq y_{n}) = P(X_{1} \leq g^{-1}(y_{1}), \hdots, X_{n} \leq g^{-1}(y_{n})) = F_{\mathbf{X}}(g^{-1}(\mathbf{y}))$\
Then you can use that\
$F_{\mathbf{Y}}(\mathbf{y}) = \int_{-\infty}^{\mathbf{y}} F_{\mathbf{Y}}(\mathbf{s}) ; \dd \mathbf{s}$\
To deduct the rest
Mikkel Angelo
With $\int_{-\infty}^{\mathbf{y}} F_{\mathbf{Y}}(\mathbf{s}) ; \dd \mathbf{s} = \int_{-\infty}^{y_{1}} \hdots \int_{-\infty}^{y_{n}} F_{\mathbf{Y}}(\mathbf{s}) ; \dd s_{1} \hdots \dd s_{n}$ that is
Mikkel Angelo
Ah so thats where you get the jacobian matrix when you differentiate afterwards
but where did the determinant come from
@fervent jackal Has your question been resolved?
@fervent jackal Has your question been resolved?
@fervent jackal Has your question been resolved?
Where did the determinant come from? 🗣️🗣️
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
this is false right?
@river latch well, with true false questions you have a 50/50 shot of guessing correctly. Why do you think it is false?
Btw
!nosols
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
Oh lol
Yes, it's obviously false because the proposed tangent line is not a line 🙂
Closed by @river latch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@sturdy island hi
It would be helpful if you divide it in cases
1 WC 3 B
1WC 4B
2WC 3B
2WC 4B
For all cases you can calculate ways and add them
@sturdy island Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how to start this guys
@still moss Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @still moss
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How did we end up with a single R variable here? I cannot figure out what they did inbetween these steps
$$\frac{1}{\sqrt 2} (R+h)=R$$ $$\frac{1}{\sqrt 2} R+\frac{1}{\sqrt 2}h=R$$ $$\frac{1}{\sqrt 2} h=R-\frac{1}{\sqrt 2} R$$ $$h=\sqrt 2 \left(R-\frac{1}{\sqrt 2} R \right)$$
Civil Service Pigeon
distribute the squareroot 2 and then factor out the R, yes I see it now
thank you
.close
Closed by @rare magnet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is solving for theta possible
cant tell if there is insufficient information or i am insufficient
You've just described exactly how I feel right now. I can not help, but I wanted you to know that you are not alone.
thanks for the support
how should i approach this
considering i feel like there is either insuffiecient information, or it is 4:50 am
Help
sunrise duration = 11:55 am - 06:58 am
that's 4 hours and 57 minutes
correct
now estimate the time frame that the whole ferris wheel will be in sunlight sicne the ferris wheel is likely to be in sunlight for a portion of the day so we can assume that it will be in sunliught for approximately haft of the duration of the sunrise
because the entire question is that there is a ferris wheel and tower kind of blocking it
but thanks for explaining
@river ivy Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I got this question in my online pre-calc course and I don't know how to combine the 4x with the rest of the expression when finding the equivalent expression:
"Which of the following is equivalent to 4x+5lnx-ln2xy?
A: ln(8x^7y)
B: ln(4x^6-2xy)
C: (5ln4x)/(ln2y)
D: ln((2x^5)/y)"
I know that I can turn the term 5lnx into lnx^5, and that you can turn the logarithms being subtracted into a division, so my guess is that it would be D, but I can't figure out what happened to the 4x.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
4x can be written as ln(e^4x)
ok, so then I can turn everything into ln(((e^4x)*x^4)/2y), but what can I do after that?
you could take out the exponent of 4 on the numerator but i don’t know what you’d do with the denominator
like 4ln(xe^x) - ln(2y)
so the program is saying that $ln({2x^5\over y})$ is correct, and it is the one that made the most sense, but I don't understand why it works and the graph doesn't look the same to me.
adjxst
if you mean $4x+5ln(x)-ln(2xy)$ and:\
A: $ln(8yx^7)$\
B: $ln(4x^6-2xy)$\
C: $\frac{5ln(4x)}{ln(2y)}$\
D: $ln(\frac{2x^5}{y})$\
Then there is no correct answer, as a counterexample consider $x=e$,$y=1$\
$4x+5ln(x)-ln(2xy) = 4e+6+ln(2)$\
A: $ln(8e^7) = 7+ln(8)$\
B: $ln(4x^6-2xy) = 1+ln(2)+ln(2e^5-1)$\
C: $\frac{5ln(4x)}{ln(2y)} = \frac{20}{ln(2)}$\
D: $ln(\frac{2x^5}{y}) = 5+ln(2)$\
As you can see none of A,B,C,D matches $4x+5ln(x)-ln(2xy)$, for $(x,y)=(e,1)$, so there can no be any equivalent expressions among the alternatives.
Crystopher
Closed by @gritty oxide
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
2
Are you to calculate the number of possible cricket teams
yup
Doy you know how to do this
I try to do this with ombination
combination but not working
@sturdy island Has your question been resolved?
Notice a certain amount of players must be included
1 wicket keeper right and at least 3 bowlers
ya
Lemme solve it
Isn't it meant to be 7c5
????
there are total 13 players so i subtract 4
and from 11 i subtract 4 also
?
did i do that wrong?
And 2
there are 2 wicket-keepers so if we are selectinG 1 then WE do not know which one we are selecting like K1 or K2
btw 22 is right answer
<@&286206848099549185>
@sturdy island Has your question been resolved?
do not worry
it ok
What you are doing
Like which level you are in
Graduate
Are you Graduate?
I am like in 11th but I am taking undergrad engineering math physics and chemistry
Are you Indian
I was rushing I Couldn't find neater paper or ise better handwriting 😞
No
, rotate
Neither
Nigeria
Cool
Why 7C7 or 7C6
Select the required remainder of people from the unselected people
Lol
Yes
Yes from the available people
We already select 4 player in which 3 are bowler and 1 is keeper
so 13-4 = 9
wdym Available one
?
Aall 13 player are available
No we use the available combination required
Which is why i split it into total players or available and required players
i know you are saying that there are 4 bolwer in total and 2 keeper in total so when we subtract 13 -4-2 it is 7
Yes
but why are we taking them all toghter and make 7 pepole out 13
Lemme re dolve with details
Ok?
ok
but why are we taking the remaining player 7
Like if we add 3 bowler and 1 keeper in team
We have to find no of ways for selecting each group of players from the available
Ok
@ ..... Please do contribute if there are mistakes
No your answer is correct
Yessir 😊
now
we are given 4 bowler and 2 keeper
We have constraint that we must have to add 3 bowler in team
and 1 keeper
If we add 3 bowler and keeper in team
We must consider 3 or more bowlers because it says at least 3
ya i am taking about case 1
if we take 3 bowlers and 1 keeper then 7 places left for other players
right
Yes
so to find these 7 players we subtract selected players
right or worng
wrong
So if we select B1 ,B2 ,B3 and K1
11-3-1=7slots remaining
13-4-2=7 residual players in the original team
No 😔 its 13-4-2
We selected these four from a total of 6 players
We select B1 ,B2 ,B3 out of B1,B2,B3,B4
6=no of wickets + no of bowlers
what??????????
Unassigned
not worry
Look at the solution you'll see I separated the team into required and total
The thing is we have assigned 4 and 2 to be selected to fill other spaces
So the remaining 7 is unassigned
You can check 3B1B and organic chem tutor for combination and permutations
ok
which one is great
cuz i sometime watch Organic Tutor
what is 3B1B???
.close
Closed by @sturdy island
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
bro is about to be mind blown from 3b1b
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What does the following article mean by the highlighted statement?
@dense tide Has your question been resolved?
@dense tide it means if you have a polynomial given by $\sum_{i=0}^n a_i x^i$ you can write it as $a_n \prod_{i=1}^n (x - r_i)$ for some sequence of coefficients ${a_i \in \mathbb{C} }$ and roots ${r_i \in \mathbb{C}}$.
OmnipotentEntity
thank you
No worries. Is it clear? Or too convoluted?
well, could you elaborate please?
Sure thing
Essentially, if you have a polynomial with real coefficients, in order to solve all of them, such as x^2 + 1 = 0, we need to use complex numbers.
But if we have polynomials with complex coefficients, we can solve them still with only complex numbers.
If we limited ourselves to real numbers only, there would sometimes be quadratic factors that cannot be split further.
But for complex numbers we can always get down to linear factors.
To be more explicit.
If you have ax^3 + bx^2 + cx + d with a-d complex numbers then there exists r1-r3 such that ax^3 + bx^2 + cx + d = a(x-r1)(x-r2)(x-r3)
Where r1-r3 are also complex
This is true for any degree polynomial.
The idea is with real numbers there was "something else" we needed to solve polynomials, and the something else is complex numbers.
So it's not closed.
But with complex numbers we can't make something else using polynomials. We can only make other complex numbers. And because we can only make other complex numbers, and not other things, it is closed.
I hope that's clear?
yes that's clear. Thank you
and a linear factor is essentially just a polynomial of first degree?
Yes, it's the (x-rn) that I've been writing everywhere
Closed by @dense tide
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
in part a, I got 1/2 but it is incorrect for some reason
there are 18 even numbers out of 36
18/36
=1/2
<@&286206848099549185>
0 is even
It's 19/37 I'm pretty sure
!15m
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
ye
The way I like to approach this kind of problem is to do it for 0 to 2, then 0 to 4, etc
See if you can spot (and of course verify) a pattern
That way you can be more confident
I can see the patern
0 to 6, 0 to 8
etc
yes, I dentify the pattern
what's next?
there are 18
I didn't use the ping also I am not helper
Sorry I fat fingered
there are total of 37 possible outcomes because the 0 doesnt count
It's ok
nvm I got it
0 is an even number
so it's 19
this case is dismissed
.close
Closed by @abstract thicket
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do we do b ii
@vernal kite Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @vernal kite
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
Ok, got it
soooo?
this one you don't suppose to find what R and r is, but write it so that the form change into something usuable
first we know the formula of the annulus as this
if you look closely, you can factor it
can you try factor it?
use pythagorean theorem on the triangle
yeah that will come in the later part, when we're dealing with diagram
but how??
I mean it's already drawn our right there
so then what's R and r?
R and r
pi (R^2 - r^2)
correct
and how does that help us
Use pythagorean theorem on the R, r and 7 triangle
See what comes up and how it can help
look at this diagram and tell me 1 Pythagorean theorem equation
thx
Are you folding kidding me?
yo chill
he's trying, geometry is hard when you don't see the connection yourself
i see R^2 = r^2 + 7^2
yes
now back to this area formula
Put 49 into the this
np
sorry if I come off as aggrsive
yeah I was the one helping
no no i thought I was telling you to apply the equation and you kept sending me closer pics 😭😭
i was getting annoyed at you for now reason lmao
Sorry
This is funny as hell 💀
np, it's all fun and game, and our friend got the answer now so all good 😂
@vernal kite sorry😭😭
I'll be going then, don't forget to close channel
Closed by @vernal kite
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
"Finding the limit of an undefined integral" seems too vague
they're called improper integrals
Sorry, I should've been more specific. I meant evaluating an integral over an interval with a singularity
there's not really a term for that specific step
it's pretty much just computing an improper integral
nothing specific for this case
Not really, $\int_{-1}^1 \frac{dx}{x}$ doesn't really exist
7aman
oh yea this one does diverge
but somthing like $\int^{1}_{-1} \frac{dx}{x^2}$ should give you an answer if i remember correctly
890s
no nvm im just tweaking
@teal geyser Has your question been resolved?
Cauchy principal value
Tysm
And is there a name for this one too?
$\int_{-1}^1 \frac{dx}{x} \to \lim_{\epsilon \to 0} \int_{-1}^1 \frac{dx}{x+i\epsilon}$
7aman
@teal geyser Has your question been resolved?
@teal geyser Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
During the proof of Lagrange's Mean Value Theorem we assume a function as F(x) = f(x) + Ax
Why do we assume it only this way? I understand that this form leads us to the proper conclusion of LMVT but why not just f(x), what's the point of also taking Ax?
Does this form or type of a function have some name?
@visual pasture Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I was wondering how to do this? I don't even know where to start. Do I do the bottom and get the restrictions? It can't = 0 or be -1
Whenever either the numerator or denominator is a + sqrt(b) it's worth trying 
@stray pilot Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @stray pilot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Furry animal!
I would like to check if there’s a part of my attempt is incorrect that leads me to a wrong answer.
Furry animal! <@&286206848099549185>
@civic coral not math, but ops on eminem?
Also
Why am I female?? 😭😭
I'm literally male
Accidentally clicked the wrong pronouns role probably
the slope of the line is 2 not -2/3
its making an acute angle with the positive x axis right so how can the slope be negative
Smart people
The solution provided by khan using calculus to solve it
Smart people
That’s too much, no?
Inefficient
Time-consuming
Exhausted
Furry animal
useless, just do what you were doing
you know that the perpendicular is the shortest distance from the origin, they just derive that using calculus
That’s quite a singular approach
Uncommon
@civic coral Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i need help
can u factorise any of the denominators?
\begin{align*}
\frac{2z(2z-1) + 4z - 3(2z-1) + z}{2z^2 - z} &= \frac{2z(2z-1) - 3(2z-1) + 4z + z}{2z^2 - z} \
&= \frac{(2z - 3)(2z - 1) + 5z}{2z^2 - z}
\end{align*}
Gizmo_siz
u didnt have to work it all out from the start
\begin{align*}
\frac{2z(2z-1) + 4z - 3(2z-1) + z}{2z^2 - z} &= \frac{2z(2z-1) - 3(2z-1) + 4z + z}{2z^2 - z} \
&= \frac{(2z - 3)(2z - 1) + 5z}{2z^2 - z} \
&= \frac{(2z - 3)(2z - 1) + 5z}{z(2z - 1)} \
&= \frac{(2z - 3)\cancel{(2z - 1)} + 5z}{z\cancel{(2z - 1)}} \
&= \frac{2z - 3 + 5z}{z} \
&= \frac{7z - 3}{z} \
&= 7 - \frac{3}{z}
\end{align*}
Gizmo_siz
fuck gpt
no u cant cancel that
why?
did u just copy from gpt..
no
that's mine
i telled gpt to do my latex thing
...
i dont know latex at all
oh
wait
i can still factor out
$\frac{2*7+3}{2}$
esthesia
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
u cant just cancel the twos
2z(2z-1)-3(2z-1)+4z+z/2z^2-z
i can still factor out
4z+z
z(4+1)
\begin{align*}
\frac{(2z-3)(2z-1) + z(4+1)}{z(2z-1)} &= \frac{(2z-3)(2z-1) + 5z}{z(2z-1)} \
&= \frac{(2z-3)\cancel{(2z-1)} + 5z}{z\cancel{(2z-1)}} \
&= \frac{2z-3 + 5z}{z} \
&= \frac{7z-3}{z} \
&= 7 - \frac{3}{z}
\end{align*}
Gizmo_siz
nah damn
this is wrong latex
it's supposed to be like this
(2z-3)(2z-1)+4z+z/2z^2-z
you can still see i can factor out 4z+z right?
so
(2z-3)(2z-1)z(4+1)/z(2z-1)
which cancels the denominator
and I'm left with
(2z-3)(4+1)
I've got 2 minutes before helper
can i ping??
1 minute left
<@&286206848099549185>
Tip: if you type it into desmos you can just copy and paste it and it gives you the latex
need help...
there's no fraction thing??
$2+\frac{4}{2x-1}+\frac{3}{x}+\frac{x}{2x^{2}-x}$
Max
$\frac{8x^{2}-4x}{4x^{2}-2x}+\frac{8x}{4x^{2}-2x}+\frac{3\left(4x-2\right)}{4x^{2}-2x}+\frac{2x}{4x^{2}-2x}$
Max
$\frac{\left(8x^{2}-4x+8x+12x-6+2x\right)}{4x^{2}-2x}$
Max
$\frac{8x^{2}+18x-6}{4x^{2}-2x}$
Max
$\frac{4x^{2}+9x-3}{2x^{2}-x}$
Max
Is this what you were looking for?
max as a helper you need to help the person get to the answer themselves not answer it for them
oh ok
Oh, I just used the wrong variable
by comm. and assoc.
2z(2z-1)-3(2z-1)4z+z/2z^2-z
this is the part where im freaking confused
because i can factor out 4z+z
(2z-3)(2z-1)z(4+1)/z(2z-1)
look i can cancel the denominator because i have z(2z-1) in my numerator
and I'm left with
(2z-3)(5)
= 10z-15
Yes if it's this equation
?
The one you got it right
but
But the latex shows a different equation
if i put it up in Google rn
the answer is different
i really need help with this...
is there anyone??
[4z - 6z + 3 + z / 2z-1(z) ] +2
Gizmo_siz
[-3/2z-1] + 2
??
$-3 + 4z - 2 / 2z - 1$
Zc
You can do the rest ig
Which step?
ok so listen to me and imma take you from the top
out of the z/2z^2-z what can you factor out of that?
specifically the denominator
z(2z-1)?
great
Oh it seems I made a slight mistake
now you have z/z(2z-1) and you can cancel the z
ah nvm i think i found my error in here
(2z-3)(2z-1)+4z+z
that right?
but there's a plus (+)
theres two terms now that have the same denominator, combine the like terms
in here
yea
so you have
imma have to write this in paper cause idk how to use the frac bots
Same
same
They mess it up
Right?
you can factor 4z+z
yes
= z(4+1)
Yes you can
Don’t get ahead of yourself, take this step by step
should it be (2z-3)(2z-1)z(4z+1) or should it be (2z-3)(2z-1)+z(4+1)?
...
$2z^2 - z + 5z - 6z + 3 / 2z^2 - z$
Zc
Look so you can make a common denominator by multiplying
yeap
well anyway i alr got my doubts
lemme show you mine
ok
Yes you get the above equation if you solve this
$4z^2 - 2z + 5z - 6z + 3 / 2z^2 - z$
Zc
Yes
i skipped some few thing in there...
You are close but not exact
you have some signs wrong
what sign?
i alr did cross out my mistake
Wait no I messed up ignore me
Ur correct. Mb I actually had a wrong sign.
Closed by @grave sphinx
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello
Closed by @grave sphinx
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can you help me with a question about linear combination
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
find the unique value of
𝑎 that makes a set not a generator of
𝑅3
@wooden summit Has your question been resolved?
@wooden summit Has your question been resolved?
Put into a matrix, row reduce. You want the case with less than 3 pivots.
Remember that you cannot divide by 0, so watch out for specific values of a when dividing.
so a value that dividing for a is equal zero?
no, just that when you divide by certain numbers involving a, make sure it wont be 0, or at least keep account of what values of a your row reducing doesnt work for when you potentially divide by 0
@wooden summit Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone explain to me the solution? I dont understand how if gamma is an empty set it can be true?cause its saying gamma proves A but how can it prove A if its empty?
.close
Closed by @open vine
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, this is abstract algebra and I would like help on how to prove why U(16) to itself given by the mapping from x to x^3 is an automorphism
Here is the question
I tried using the four separate steps of an isomorphism to prove that a group G is isomorphic to a group G bar
Don’t know how to prove why it’s operation preserving
@west scarab Has your question been resolved?
@west scarab Has your question been resolved?
@west scarab still here ?
aight
what are your four steps ? (just to know what they are)
do you have a clear idea what it means for that specific mapping to be operation preserving ?
first step: prove the mapping of a function phi from G to G bar, second step: to prove how the function phi is injective, third step: to prove how the function phi is surjective
last is pretty much operation preserving
ok
sort of
dont know whether it should be phi(a+b) or phi(a*b) for all a and b in G
well what's the operation in the group U(16) ?
oh its multiplication mod n
so in this case it would be multiplication mod 16 then
i dont know how to prove that based on the mapping from x to x^3
hm okay
phi(a * b)mod16 = phi(a)mod16 * phi(b)mod16 for all a and b in G
forgot to mention the mapping from x to x^3
phi(a^3 * b^3)mod16 = phi(a^3)mod16 * phi(b^3)mod16
right, drop the phi's, you already computed it here
ok
and you're going a bit fast
dont know if i have to show anything else
phi(a*b) = a^3 * b^3, that's what you're saying ?
you're gonna have to justify that a little bit
that doesn't follow straight up from the definition of phi
would i have to show anything else that its an automorphism
i failed this a year ago so i dont remember too much if there were any properties/steps
there's no extra steps in your 4 step list I'm adding all of a sudden
I'm just not convinced by that part
again, what's phi(a*b) ? just apply the definition of phi, don't do anything else
ok
To justify, the operation U(16) is preserved under multiplication from the mapping G to G bar for all a and b in G. Phi in this case would be a function defined as an isomorphism mapping onto itself after verifying the four steps.
i honestly suck at abstract algebra so im not that skilled at this yet
well anyways thanks for the help
i think i had most things figured out
.close
Closed by @west scarab
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I am just starting calculus
Can someone send step by step
I tried conjugate but idk what to do after
!show
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
xd_senBugha
I got this after the conjugate
How did you get that conclusion
Is it undefined?
.
you want to approach x=0 right? try for a small x, like x=1
you will get a negative in the sqrt
its not uhh -3,3 its -inf to -3 and 3 to inf right?
senBugha meant that you have R without (-3,3)
It's the same thing
ye i understand mb
I see that it’s incorrect now
How did you guys get the conclusion
Can you figure it out without finding the domain of the numerator thing
basically put 0 and the square root is becoming negative
i know its wrong to do that since the limit is becoming undefined
Put something else really close to 0
yeah works as good
it's not about the 0, it's about the values close to 0
,w limit of x/x as x approaches 0
here we have an example of how the 0 doesn't really matter
i know 0+ and 0- blud didnt know what domain was so i just told him to check with 0
@runic river Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @runic river
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can anyone help me with 3.34 and 3.35?
,rccw
What is that?
command to rotate the last posted image counterclockwise
just rotating the image
it stands for rotate counter clockwise
I could help with 3.34
Well i tried finding 9! First
Then dividing it with 3! And 4! And 2
That is where I got stuck
you have to draw one black ball somewhere
lets say it happens first
so first, you draw a black ball.
how many ways can we draw the remaining 2?
2 ways
no
Oh sorry
how many balls are there left after we draw the first black ball
no
4!
how many balls are there to start
9
Yes
now we need to draw 2 more balls
we can draw any of the 8 for the second draw
and now, 7 are left
we can draw any of the seven
there is only one slightly tricky part to check
we might worry that, if we draw the black ball last, we have to restrict the possibilities of the first 2 draws
to make sure there remains a black ball for us to draw on the 3rd draw
is it a concern?
I wouldnt say so
yea, me neither
because there are 3 black balls
we could draw black - black - black and be fine
so we dont need to restrict anything
why?
There is a repetition of 4 red balls and 2 black balls and 2 white balls
oh are the implied distinct 
No
lemme think
We might get many permutations in the same order
right
Soo i will divide now
is this a concern
i get the same answer both ways
ohh sorry we need to use 8c2 dont we
ugh this is turning into more f a nightmare than i thought
because some of the ones between black ball second isnt actually distinct
maybe its easier to enumerate all possible combos
and remove the ones with no black balls
video 
Make that a 3.5
What’s wrong
unusual
Video or working?
Why 8C2 tho?
We can permutate and divide it by the no. Of repetitions factorial
Can you explain why
When selecting items where the order isn’t important, combinations are the right choice.
@tidal sierra Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help me determine what lim x-> -3 |g(x) - f(x)| would be
from my understanding this would be the limit as x-> -3 g(x) which is = 1
and x -> -3 f(x) which is 4
so 1 - 4
yes
i think so?
That all looks 100% correct to me
but the solutions provided
or the like multiple choice solutions only have 4, -2 , 6, 0, -3
yeah lemme get it
There might be a part that you missed that we might be able to point out
It's not abs
those don't look like abs bars
Just square brackets
just square brackets
It is quite small to be misleading
Yeah completely understandable
why do people even use square brackets smh
looks right
its the same ish concept except now its the limit as x approaches 1 for both functions
because it is useful to visually distinguish different brackets
But if you are working with absolute function, your intuition is correct. To further point out, absolute function is continuous. Therefore, limit of absolute of something is absolute of limit of something.
Approaches -1, not 1.
No worries. Just wanted to make sure it was a typo rather than a reading mistake.
These are my last two can y’all just double check it
i think i got the concept im just worried
i made a careless error yk
Lgtm
Looks good
Closed by @covert island
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, I'm not looking to solve an existing equation but rather need help finding it. Also it might be a bit more rudimentary than what this discord is used to..
I hope that's okay and I drew a diagram if my explanation sucks.
I am intending to engineer a box where a push-solenoid (a small electronic piston) will:
push a door of a known length,
with known distance pushed, and distance of the pushing from point of rotation.
With these I hope to find the angle which the door will swing to, ignoring resistance.
Thank you. In the diagram the red represents the unknown variable.
can you clarify what you mean by "distance of push"
imagine you put your finger on a doorknob of your door. you push forward(assuming the door is unlatched), 3 inches. the door probably opens a small amount.
ah i see
i think it's just a trigonometric ratio
let the angle be θ
sin(θ) is the distance pushed divided by the distance of the pushing from point of rotation
so to find θ we use the inverse of sine
$$\theta = \sin^{-1}(\frac{d_\text{pushed}}{d_\text{from rotation point}})$$
aZxc
Closed by @warped spear
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I feel like I'm missing something trivial here, but why is the RHS continuous depending on x?
I'm aware of the result that the iterated integral of a continuous function is continuous, but that's only for a compact interval. But here the iterated integral is on all of Rn, so why is it still continuous??
@eternal rain Has your question been resolved?
I don't know much but did you say its true on a compact interval? You do know that R^n is compact by the Heine Borel Theorem?
sorry I meant to say bounded interval
Closed by @eternal rain
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I found that both A and C are false but the mark scheme says that only C is false, where am I going wrong
Is it that the lim x-> 2 approaches the same answer from both sides despite the point (2,1) being defined
Yes essentially
Closed by @ornate radish
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello
