#help-13
1 messages · Page 286 of 1
but here it doesnt
if youre evaluating then it doesnt matter as long as your limits are right
They are the same, but your answer is not correct if you write sin(u) where you meant sin(5x).
You have to clarify
"where u=5x"
and if you have to do that
note how they changed the bounds
you might aswell put it back in
Yah not if you change the bounds
so ur saying that the answer would be the same so long as you change the limits and correctly sub the u values with the lims?
in adefinite integral, you dont have to resub x if you change the bounds and solve the integral in terms of u
if you do it in terms of u and are evaluating, then the bounds must be in terms of u and that would be equivalent
if you are going to put x back in at the end
then use the original bounds
if i ask you to solve something in terms of x and you tell me the answer is "k + 1", that's not useful unless i know what k is
Yes and that's what I was getting at earlier before I realized it was a definite integral
if it is indefinite integration then your answer should be in terms of the original variable certainly
Closed by @vocal patio
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What am I supposed to do?
well you've found a,b,c and d right?
Well yeah
But how am I supposed to solve it an easier way
The last part
for b?
B and c
to find b since you already have a you can substiute it into g(x)=ax+b
and to find c since you already have b you can sub it into h(x)=cx+d
@steep pelican do you think you can do that
ok np
@steep pelican Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Could someone tell me all the step for this
what exactly are you being asked to do
Find all integer value of m from -5 to 5 so that y min value <-1
I stopped my work at derivate the function
Min value = -1?
<
Oh ok
Youre on the right track
Apply the second derivative rule to check for minimas
ye I tend to do y'=0 then use table but I was so bad at trigonometric 🥲
@small mural Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help in complex number
What do u not understand about that?
Multiply both denominator and numerator by it's conjugate
For ex: conjugate of a+b is a-b
thank you
Np 
the denominator is already conjugated right?
How?
The method is to rationalise it. For which u multiply both Deno and num to it's conjugate
Where
nvm I thought so
@urban mason Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @urban mason
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$\sqrt{x^2} = |x|$
when u apply - infinty squared it becomes postive
b
sqrt of infinty is infinity
right
so why does it equal -x here?
oooooooh
cause
x is -infinity
so u get - -infinity = positive infinity
right?
yee
alright makes sense
Closed by @peak salmon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i'm not sure how to set this one up honestly
still need help?
i got some parametric equations (set y = t) then if -1 < t < 1, you get the two points it gives you
yeh
okay, give me a few mins :>
im gonna need to type the steps down cus i aint got my phone with me rn, is that okay?
no the answer i got is zero, i was just writing down what the correct answer from the book is
you can simplify it using the green's theorem
oh my this cant be typed down
i'll try to take a pic
okay im back
give me a sec to take a pic
aight
is green's theorem just the only way to make it work?
obv not
theres many other diff ways
Another way would be just directly compute the line integral over the C
parametrization
could you tell where i went wrong with my work up there?
i never learnt the way YOU solved tbh
thats why i had to solve it in a different way than you
theres other ways i can solve by
but idk the method you used
i have to go grocery shopping, can you wait for like half an hour?
im glad :> text me private if youneed something. its always chaotic over here haha
its complicated tbh
i am not that advanced in calculus
mostly the basics
common sense and knowledge stuff--
Closed by @chilly rock
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi. How do I solve this problem?
log_pi (5) = log(5)/log(pi)
if that helps, using that log rule you can reduce that exponent to be a rational fraction
that is the change of base formula
it's equivalent to log4(5)
omg, I understand nothing, can you please elaborate?
$16^\log_{4}{5}$
mochaccino
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
look up change of base formula
$(4^2)^\log_{4}{5}$
mochaccino
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
can you give me a link to a website where I can read about it and see similar tasks?
uhh
idk
the formula should pop up
or just look up "logarithm properties"
that should do it
$4^{2\log_{4}{5}}$
mochaccino
$4^{\log_{4}{25}}$
mochaccino
$25$
mochaccino
@soft geyser Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @soft geyser
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Thanks
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how can I even go about solving this, wolframalpha and sympy both gave up
its an elliptic integral
yeah
but like whats with the complex numbers
@robust harbor Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @robust harbor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
so i already got the crossproduct just not sure how to show that resulten cross product vector is perpendicular to b
the cross product was 2i+8j+36k
i see, give me sec
can anyone explain me why is it (56/88)(55/87)(54/86) for question c.i. please?
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
nah it didnt equal to zero but 8, so i guess its not perpendicular
Bro
You are doing it wrong
The question asks the resultant vector is. Perpendicular to b
2 + 32 - 36 = 0
i am?
yeah that’s the dot product
oh did you do the dot product of the original vectors
ohhh mb i didnt read the question, sry lol
i just thought it was the original two.
thanks
.close
Closed by @lavish pendant
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi, can anybody help me sketch the graph, im pretty sure i can do the rest alone but im wondering how to graph it
should i simply take the basic exp function and transform it
by moving it 3 units up
and making it 2times more narrow
?
not narrow, 2 times taller
sorry
narrow would've been e^2x, you have 2e^x
i was confused with a parabola
but otherwise correct
so it would cross y=0 at 5 instead of 1 right ?
bc 1x2 + 3
the domain would still be R
the range would be 3;+infinity
and how can i find b without a calculator tho ?
and the horizontal asymptote is 3 right ?
insert 1
yes but i dont have a calculator
waittt
i only need the exact value
so i can keep e
as it is
its basically the same
b = 2e+3
3.0
wdym ?
@round ledge Has your question been resolved?
@round ledge Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @round ledge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is this correct? is it a typo where its meant to say 1/(2Fx) or am I tripping?
@ivory token Has your question been resolved?
@ivory token Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @ivory token
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hii, I'm stuck trying to solve this 1 problem from my book which is to prove $\sum^\infty e^{-n^2x}$ is of class $C^1$.\
I tried proving $\sum^\infty(e^{-n^2x})'$ is uniformly convergent but wasn't able to :c\
Is the thesis even true? Could you give me any hints?\
Thanks for having a look!
Clippy
@west berry Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185> any ideas?
@west berry Has your question been resolved?
@west berry Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @west berry
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
part d e and f
@lofty epoch Has your question been resolved?
@lofty epoch Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @lofty epoch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
use log base 3 of 12 = 2.262 and log base 3 of 2 = 0.631 to evaluate the logarithm log base 3 of 32
Is this possible using log base 3 of 12?
Only way I could solve was 5 (log base 3 of 2) but maybe I'm just not seeing it
with the given information only, no
youre completely right
Closed by @manic condor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
If expand this product
Why do only those terms stay, where the exponents of the a_k are all different, while all terms with at least one same exponent cancel out?
a_k are elements of a field
by "factor out", do you mean "expand"
yeah, sorry
its late here
im sitting on those task for hours haha
this is the last step for me to be done
so what do you know about a_k besides the fact that they belong to a field
Nothing, but it works notheless, like look at (a-b)(a-c)(b-c)=
yes I know how to expand parenthesis
All exponents are different, those terms with the same exponents like abc cancel
Yeah, i didnt want to assume that you dont know
sorry
no it's just 4 am and I'm trying to figure out what's going on
its 2 am over here lol
alright I think I see what you're saying
I dont think if that approach works:
sorry can't help good night
@cursive crystal Has your question been resolved?
@cursive crystal Has your question been resolved?
idk if this helps but the product in question is called the Vandermode determinent
nd is the determinent of this special matrix
notice how when you calculate the determinent of this you have to kind of cross out the column and row of the element you are at- so that means no other term in that product will have the same exponent
@cursive crystal Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i need help proving this
@forest escarp Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185> 😭
Try expanding left hand side
Nah wait it's 1/n above
this problem is under the topic of analysis and number theory
so im guessing ill have to treat it as a continuous function and look at growth rates
cs prev problems were like that
but the derivatives are all rlu weirs
wdym "split n into 1s"
There are n terms right
1+1+1...n times = n
U want n + h(n)
1 +1/n for every term
to get rid of the harmonic
U sure abt this approach
Usually in such questions U got to twist the terms
Compare it with the upper bound
Proove (1+n)^1/n < 2
oh k thx
Should be close I think I made some simplification mistake
This should be usual approach for such qs
Closed by @forest escarp
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
I got the mistake
The equality is reversed
@forest escarp
The one here
yeah i js realized that too
ru sure bounds is the method here bc the 2 are very close
.reopen
✅
I am unable to bind them 😦 let me think more bounds
It has different behavior when n is big n small
Equality keeps changing
I get it
Right side n is discrete
We can't take continuous n on left
@forest escarp
So it n can never go close to 0
N goes from 1 to infinity
🙂
💪
I think I proved it
@forest escarp
N > 1
For n = 1 they will be equal
👍
I am weak at limits...try solving the limits
This should be solution
i foudn the inf limits of both sides
oh classmate suggested binomial expansion
if you divide both sides by n and then ^n
I also thought of binomial first but this one looks simpler
I got solution
oh nice
Divide both side by n+1
U can prove left is less than 1
Easily
N divided by number greater than n
wait but if you divide by n+1
you would have n*(n+1)^(1/n-1)
N+1 is not 0
which can be greater than 1
plug in anything greater than 1
yep
This qs is rubbish
i have this
lmoa
Shouldn't it be monotonically increasing function
graphically it looks to be
Aaah I am dividing that's why
ohhg
(N+1)^1/n is just n^1/n
Which is 1
So it's n
And other side is n+1
what
Expand left side
Done
@forest escarp I couldn't solve simple limits for so long
I need to die asap
Here it works
No tricks involved clean sol
im havign a hard time reading that
yeah ive been trying limits and increase/decrease stuff for a while so i dont think theres anything there
Only expansion will work
Send me the solution if u get it as well
@forest escarp Has your question been resolved?
@forest escarp Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hii, I'm stuck trying to solve this 1 problem from my book which is to prove $\sum^\infty e^{-n^2x}$ is of class $C^1$.
I tried proving $\sum^\infty(e^{-n^2x})'$ is uniformly convergent but wasn't able to :c
Is the thesis even true? Could you give me any hints?
Thanks for having a look!
Clippy
x is all real numbers right?
$x>0$, sorry forgot to mention
Clippy
well
if we take a look at the supremum
,,\sup_{x>0} \abs{-n^2e^{-n^2x}} = \sup_{x>0} n^2e^{-n^2x}
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
e^(-n²x) is decreasing
yea
strange
nah i think it's correct
if x > 0 it goes suddenly
down
if your interval was x > p and p > 0 then it would be uniformly convergent because p would be bigger than 0 but constant
so the e^ term would not disappear
i think it might be enough tho
and e^(-nx) for any n > 0 dominates n²
because in that case we have\
$f(x) = \sum e^{-n^2x}$\
$\sum (-n^2e^{-n^2x})$ is uniformly convergent\
and if $f(x_0)$ is convergent for some $x_0$\
then we have that $f$ is $C^1$ in any $[p,b], 0<p<b$,\
so $f$ is $C^1$ in $(0,\infty)$
well it converges point wise for sure
Clippy
true
so I think I just have to polish it but it's roughly proven? or do I not see sth?
well for x > 0 it can't be uniformly convergent because the sup is not 0
yeah but this is not what we're trying to prove tho
well you tried that in the beginning
that's why i was here lol
true, but you made me realize it suffices to prove it for [p,\infty)
at least that's what I think
if p > 0 then yea you're right
because then the e^ term isn't gone
and it will eventually -> 0
the sup
,, \sup_{x>p>0} n^2e^{-n^2x} = \frac{n^2}{e^{n^2p}} \to 0 \text{ for } p > 0
Because Im trying to use the theorem that states that if $\sum f_n'$ is uniformly convergent on [a,b] to g and $\sum f_n(x_0)$ is convergent, then $\sum f_n$ is convergent and f'=g
i think so, I won't close for a bit until I'll make sure I understand everything but thx!
@west berry Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So there's a line between points A and B
and you divide that line in a ration of 2:1
and the point you have at that division, for it you need to find the position vector
Very arduously
There's probably a plug in formula for this somewhere lol
Hold on, lemme cook
Are you familiar with trigonometry?
yes
So here's my approach
we have points A(x1,y1) and B(x2,y2) right?
in the generic case
yes
yes
Let the angle between them be p
sin(p) = (y2-y1)/L
cos(p) = (x2-x1)/L
assuming B is top right in comparison to A
the signs might change if not, not sure how the angles would behave but it should still work
This ok?
Pardon, I mean the angle that the line AB makes with the x axis
You don't need trigonometry at all
AB = (8 - 2, 8 - 5) = (6, 3)
So 2:1 means that you need a point that is 2/(2 + 1) = 2/3rds of the way
2/3 * (6, 3) = (4, 2)
Can you figure out what to do now?
Notice that the vector (6, 3) is the same distance and direction from the origin
theres a formula if you want
(x1,y2) (x2,y2) m:n -> (mx2+nx1/m+n, my2 + ny2/m+n)
I'm used to using trig lol, would've messed with angles and stuff
@meager flicker Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @meager flicker
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
roughly made kite shape. can someone find the the remaining sides
6781 is the length of the entire diagonal btw
What remaining sides?
the red question marks
Oh the question marks lol
pythagorean theorem
Well can't you just find the heights of the left and right triangle
Isn't there like a rule that the diagonals for these things are perpendicular
correct me if im wrong but the lines inside the kite also form right angles so you can just do pythagorean twice
but i dont know one side
ur from the middle east?
u didnt help me yesterday 😦
I did you went offline, we pinged
follow the red circles on the side lol
why are right angle marks drawn?
because theyre right angles
that's one triangle
look at the bottom one
the left and right ? are the same length
this is also a property of these things I think
so the issue here is that 2232^2 + 6371^2 is not equal to 6781^2
So you really only have 2 unknowns
so we can see they cannot be right angles
2322 is an approximation
2322.136947
and the other numbers?
theyre exact
so how do i find them
is that an actual kite?
2 pairs of equal sides = yes
Shorter Diagonal - 4363.466889
Half of Shorter Diagonal - 2181.733445
Central Question Mark - 795.210146
great
how
u use kite area
no
maybe try this, Red×Blue=2232×6371 and you can get blue by pytagorean
do not do that
Don't mind my art skills
2232.something * 6371 * 2 = long diagonal * short diagonal
and u go from there
.
ok
how is 2232 x 6371 kite area
.
can you post the original question?
google says long diagonal x short diagonal /2 is kite area
because you have two right triangles
like what was known in the original question
the kite is 2 of the dark red triangles, so 2×1/2×2232×6371
the two triangles are the same
so see here
ohhh
i got area of kite
then what
@crimson sedge Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi?
.close
Closed by @tropic timber
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can anybody explain the answers to me
and what do these arrows mean
i believe the arrows mean "logically implies that"
These arrows mean "if... then..."
ohh
a should be true due to conjugate root theorem
i get the last one but dont get the others
if... then....
the one behind arrow is writtena after if... and the one after arrow is after then...
is that a theorem
complex conjugate root theorem
oh right
if z = a + bi, then z = a - bi is a solution as long as coefficients are real
you can't have one real and one unreal root for a quadratic equation can you?
not for this one
yep
as coefficients are real
complex conjugates right?
B is false
its not true and false it is always, sometimes, never
true
wait
you can think of counterexamples
but in general yeah its sometimes, never, always
I dont see one
its from the answer bank
complex conjugates can never be equal
i didnt understand
a+ib has a conjugate a-ib
now these are equal only when b=0
i.e. the root must be real (imaginary part equals zero)
oh wait coefficients are real right
now for the 'c' one, the answer bank makes it pretty clear ig
right
Closed by @lusty lotus
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone tell me how am i supposed to find arccos -√3/2 WITHOUT checking the calc
ik its in quadrant 2 bla bla but how am i supposed to know it during an exam like buhm
without wasting time
note: this is not for an exam
Is the exam banned calculator?
what's the answer to $\cos \theta = -\f{\sqrt 3}{2}$ where $\theta \in [0, \pi]$
In general, arccos(-x) = pi - arccos(x) and for arccos(sqrt(3)/2) you just need to know the trig ratios
uoǝu
no but im preapring for uni and idk whther theyll allow me
do i have to memorize them?
Pretty much
alr
shit
one more thing i saw a rule in the book but cant find it now
whats the thing for yk arctan(tan smthn
or tan(tan^-1x)
Not necessarily
explain
Nvm I was thinking of arctan(tan(x))
what is
tan^-1(tanx)
tan(tan^-1x)
its what im askin
and the otherwise
$$tan^-1(tan3\pi)$$
ghiolimer
$$tan(tan^-1x)$$
ghiolimer
tan(arctan(x)) = x
arctan(tan(x)) should be the equivalent of x in the interval [-pi/2, pi/2] modulo pi whenever tan(x) is defined
they are different
ghiolimer
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
ugh anyways
its -√3
i dont
then evaluate cosine of the angle
Knowing trig ratios for that one is not necessary
Draw a triangle where tan of one of the angles is sqrt(3), find its cosine
(Since cos(arctan(-x)) = cos(-arctan(x)) = cos(arctan(x)))
thats pretty much the trig ratio lol
It doesn't require you to know the angle though
@somber juniper Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @somber juniper
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello
trying to learn it
if i integrate the right side of this. i get x^2 + C
its abuse of notation to make seperable differential equations easier to understand
but what happens if i integrate dy/y and what does "dy/y" even mean?
yes
1/y * dy
what is integral of 1/y ?
there u go
Closed by @smoky willow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Topic: Combinatorics. I dont get Part 2
Idk how to do it without the deletion-contraction theorem
Deletion-Contraction results in sorta complicated polynomials that are difficult to simplify here
for example for C_5 it's k(k-1)^4 - k(k-1)^3 + k(k-1)(k-2)
A bit tedious to simplify that to (k - 1)^5 - (k - 1), unless they wanted us to do it that way which I seriously doubt
@balmy jewel Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @balmy jewel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can somone plz look to part a, i do not sure about the answe , since yn converge to 0 its mean the two term in the sequence will be close to each other and hence it will be contractive sequence since contractive sequence is cauchy then it is converge is it true my answer? If you have another answer plz let me know
@hot sandal Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@hot sandal Has your question been resolved?
@hot sandal Has your question been resolved?
"since yn converge to 0 its mean the two term in the sequence will be close to each other and hence it will be contractive sequence since contractive sequence is cauchy"
for example, the sequence sqrt{n} is such that the difference in terms goes to zero, but the sequence itself doesn't converge [to a finite limit] nor is Cauchy, it's unbounded
You may (i.e. really should!) use the fact that you're also told the even terms increase and the odd terms decrease
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I don't understand where these equations come from
I copied it in class and I am confused rn
The way I wrote it when I was copying slightly more sense than answer key on the right image because it shows the steps but I am having trouble seeing why those steps are like that like how do I know t_A consists of t_b and t_c
Would be great if I could be shown visually the path
Like with this logic shouldn't t_d consist of b and c?
@left gull Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @left gull
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello
So like I need help with these
We're not face to face and I don't quite understand 😭
Is it okay if anyone can give an example with activity A 1. And activity B 1. I'll follow up 😭
it's just finding the missing side with pytha. theorem
So like you just apply the pythagorean theorem??
yes
yes?
OH
a is the side opposite of angle A
and so on
you're given 2 sides already so just find the missing one with a^2 + b^2 = c^2
So like c² = 10 + 15
no
10²
yes
- 15²
Sorry I forgot to add ²
OH
SO KTS JUET LOOE THAT
OKAY
Sorry it's 3 am and I am functioning slowly
So is it the same at activity 2?
nop
you complete the triangle first by finding third side using pythageorean theorem
then use trigonometric ratios to find angles
solving a triangle does mean finding all angles and sides
but i think it's just finding the missing side
since the person here isn't too familiar with pythag.
what
i said find third side then use trig ratios to find angles
isnt that true
huh
"solving a triangle does mean finding all angles and sides"
Yes
bro
but i think because the person here isn't too familiar with pythag. , so it's just finding the missing side
It wasn't discussed much
Since our schedule changed
Our classes are mixed
Modular + f2f basically it's a self study lesson but how could I fully comprehend if there is no one to teach me 😭
Yup I'm done with the first activity
What about the second one 😭
Could you give one example :')
@ocean orbit Has your question been resolved?
@ocean orbit Has your question been resolved?
actuallly you have to do same thing
this
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I found 2 different points given the whole line of intersection from 2 different plane equations but I need to find a 3rd one that isnt parallel and I dont know how to do that just given that there is a plane perpendicular to the one I am solving for
so it needs to be perpendicular to the plane x + y - 4z = 3
the normal vector of x + y - 4z = 3 is i + j -4k
as the plane needs to be perpendicular, the normal vector can be just ANY vector that is perpendicular to i + j - 4k
so let the normal vector equal ai + bj + ck and set up a dot product equation = 0
and find any values of a, b, c that work
so I got <2,2,1> and then I used that combined with a point I solved for to get the equation 2x+2y+z-6=0 but it was wrong
its right
theres “infinite solutions” cause theres an infinite number of normal vectors perpendicular to i + j - 4k
it didnt work when plugged in but yea there are inifinite solutions
this website supposedly gives it to u if its right even if the answer was 5 and u put 1(5)(1)(1)
so im still stuck
what did you get for the line of intersection?
I just solved for 2 points instead of the line which should work but apparently not
its i-3j+k
<@&286206848099549185>
2x+2y+z-6=0 is what I have and it is saying its wrong
I guess I do it another day
.close
Closed by @true garnet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello
im wondering how i would solve:
y'' + y' = e^(-x)
i know there is two steps
first solve y'' + y' = 0
and then find one solution where u "guess"
and add them together
for this i get A + Be^(-x)
but this i dont know...
well what made you think of that
if Axe^(-x) dont work what would u try next
i mean if you differentiate this
you get different terms bc of product rule
and x isnt too crazy
like im not gonna test sometjing like Asin(x)e^-x
Closed by @smoky willow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
so should it just be uh
the spherical coordinate form of it?
as in rsin(phi)cos(theta),rsin(phi)sin(theta),rcos(phi)
Whatever you want actually
Since we are talking about a sphere it might be the right solution
Closed by @teal lake
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I go about solving this problem, they only give the tan(theta) = y/x property but idk what to do when tan(6theta) is the problem here
Convert r= 6 theta into rectangular
Like by drawing a right triangle and physically working it out?
Or do you mean something else
There's a video the question provided, and he applied tan to both sides
tan r = tan(sqrt(x^2 + y^2)
then the right side was tan(theta) = tan(y/x)
Then he used arctan
Mind if you attach the video?
It's through cengage so I'm not sure it works, but here:
Aight now your begining equation makes more sense
No it works fine
try moving the 6 to the other side as r/6
you would end with (sqrt(x^2+y^2))/6 = arctan(x/y)
Like this?
yep
You're able to move the coefficient out of the tan?
My PreCalc knowledge has always been really weak so I'm sorry if it sounds dumb
No
You're moving the 6 to the other side when r=6theta
Wait is this legal?
Forget about it
No way lol
ig you can cause it's not in the parenthesis on tan yet
tysm man this was actually beating my ass for an hour
have a great day
Next time try to move things to the simple side of the equation
same, have a great day
.close
Closed by @limber sparrow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how can I parameterize this surface?
I know its a triangle but I dunno how to parameterize it
Three line segments?
@crimson sedge Has your question been resolved?
yeah
oh wait
isnt there a more efficient way though?
instead of setting up 3 different integrals for it
Like I know im supposed to use uh
Stokes theorem I think for it
@crimson sedge Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @teal lake
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how would i go about finding the derivative of this? i know its simple but im just a bit cknfused
nothing to do but use the rules
you got chain rule, product rule, power rule
assuming you know the derivative of cos(x)?
thats all you need
-sinx right
it is
yea