#help-13
1 messages · Page 281 of 1
Ye so u do the brackets first? Then multiply?
Thx ig sorry for being dumb
@lean ledge Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @lean ledge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how does -4^2x * ln(4) * 2 become (1-2*4^x)
they r first factoring 4^xln(4)
Closed by @subtle jolt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I don't understand part a i
So I intergrated the square root of 8x to get 16x/3
(I manipulated the square root of 8x to get (8x)^1/2 and then integrated that).
So it says that a=x So that means I can just replace my upper limit of a with x. I got :
16x/3 - 16(1)/3 = 10
Then i rearranged to find x and I did not get 20 root 2
Your integral appears to be incorrect
When you apply the power rule to an exponent of 1/2, what is your new exponent?
Ohhhh yeah...I think I see where I went wrong now. So i add one to the power of a half and then divide 8x by that so I actually get 16/3 x^3/2 , right ?
Not quite.. notice that your 8x is being multiplied under the radical...
the 1/2 exponent applies to both terms
not just the x
And since we can remove constants to the front of the integral...
i recommend just taking sqrt(8) out of the integral tbf
as you’ve done here (i didn’t read this far before i sent that)
Wait sorry how does that work ? If we're integrating 8^1/2 and x^1/2 then how can we times root 8 by the integral of x if we're integrating 8 along with x also ?
root 8 is just a constant
Rules of integrals
so you can take it out of the integral
Ah ok, but we can't take out the x right as that isn't constant ?
yes!
gives you the same answer either way
just makes ur life easier if you take it out
Ahhh alright, so we could keep the 8 as an integral but we just take it out to speed up computation ? I guess what i'm trying to say is; is it still mathematically correct if we keep 8 as an integral ?
Yes, it's still correct if you keep the sqrt(8) on the right, inside the integral
You just have to remember that the 1/2 exponent applies to it, as well
But honestly? When you start playing with fractional exponents, it'll save you some headache to simplify
Especially when the integrals start getting harder
Speaking of headaches... do you know how to integrate (8x)^1/2 ? Because I don't really know and it's giving me a headache lol. In my mind I keep getting 16/3 x^3/2 but that's wrong and I don't really know how to do it correctly...
So, let's move the sqrt(8) outside the integral and just integrate x^.5
1/6x ^6 ?
oh wait I noticed a point 5 do you mean 1 half or literally x^5 ?
1/2 = .5
Yep!
It is, but we can reduce things a little bit
2 * 4 = 8.. so sqrt(8) = sqrt(2 * 4)
4 is a perfect square, so we can take that out from under the radical
sqrt(8) = 2 sqrt(2)
Ok, is that it for reducing it because i have no idea how we would reduce 2/3x^3/2 ?
Ohhhh I see it's our fully simplified expression
Yep
Ahh alright that makes sense.
Well thanks a lot to you and @crimson sedge for the help. I really get this now and thanks for the tip about being able to remove the constants. Anyways, this was my last question of the day so I'm Gunna go and get some sleep but thanks again for all the help !
That's your indefinite integral.. looks like the problem still has you doing a few other things with the definite integral
You good on that?
Yep I should be. It's pretty much just the same process but with sqrt(x)
👍
So x^1/2 and that becomes (as an integral) 2/3x^ 3/2
Yep
And our lower limit is 0 so it's literally just:
2/3x^ 3/2 = 10 (I believe)
and then solve for x
Not quite
oh... In that case I didn't know this as well as I thought have lol. Let me go look at the question real quick
OHHHHH
You plug the value of your upper limit into your indefinite integral, and then subtract [the value of your lower limit plugged into your indefinite integral]
So have you integrated from 0 to a and taken the integral from 0 to 1 away from it ?
Oh wait.. I don't think it's asking you to find the value of a
.
Well I think since a=x then finding a value of a or finding a value of x should just be equivalent I think ?
Well, you've got all the x values from 1 to a
I'm not sure exactly what your problem is asking you to find.. either the indefinite integral, which we did earlier, or the actual value of a, which is.. where I might be taking you too far down the rabbit hole
Have you guys done definite integrals yet?
Definite integrals is when we integrate with limits right ?
Sorry it's been a while since i've done integration so I'm a bit rust with the terminology
No.. it's when you integrate with defined upper and lower bounds.. a and 1 in this case
Oh yes we've done that.
ok.. it might be asking you to find the actual value of "a" then... in which case, that's the equation I wrote out above
If you can, ask your instructor exactly what is wanted..
If not? Ehh.. put both and ask for extra credit if there's too much info 😉
Lol sorry this literally made me laugh out loud for a couple of seconds straight. Anyway, I just found this question from this google drive on the internet, here's the google drive if you're curious...https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1QEmHel9tNGPnsiRRu0NgXGTA4HeTfawu
Also, in the mark scheme it integrates with a upper bound of a so I would say your approach is correct
because like why would they integrate with a and not solve for it right ?
That was my thinking 👍
Anyways, thanks again for your help, I'm Gunna go get some sleep and give my brain a rest from calculus...
np - night
@crimson sedge Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I solve for this?
Says it need to be in a decimal
keep in mind that $\sqrt{x}$ is defined when $0 \le x < \infty$
Dork9399
I am so confused
okay
so $6-7x \ge 0$
Dork9399
$6 \ge 7x$
Dork9399
$x \le \frac{6}{7}$
Dork9399
I see
so you just have to choose values in that interval
so any decimal in between would work
.25 and .50 for exmaple
and not in the domain would be outside
yes
for the first part you could have also chose numbers like -5 or -10
because they are also in the interval
Dork9399
yeah because it's on the outside
thanks broski that really helped my understanding
.close
Closed by @quartz crypt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
you forgot something
the right term
product rule
it needs another 2x
otherwise you can do it piecewise and separate into 2 cases
ah sorry i mean chain rule
like this
Ransik
Ransik
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
@crimson sedge Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
so when looking for the missing parts of the triangle right the angles right, how do I know If im going to use sin,cos, or tan
see what information you know, then look at soh cah toa
if you have the angle and its opposite and want the hypotenuse, then you would want sin, since its sin, opposite hypotenuse
if you have two sides and want the angle, see what those sides are in respect to said angle, then choose the one which involves them
etc
@wary fern Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @wary fern
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Parametric to Rectangular conversion, I don't understand part (b) of this question, can someone explain it to me?
is the answer, but I don't understand the process of finding the "z" variable at all
@simple seal Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185> 😭
Can someone explain why they took the trace to find a circle, and why the radius is x?
@simple seal Has your question been resolved?
@simple seal I agree that the solution key is a bit unclear. I have the following picture
so the idea is when we project onto the xz-plane we should get circles (since were working with a paraboloid) of the form x^2+z^2=r^2. The radii of the various circles are exactly x (the distance we move along the x-axis)
This gives the relationship that x^2 + z^2 = x^2
Using the fact that y = 1 + x^2/4, so x^2 can be replaced with 4y-4.
This gives $x^2 + z^2 = 4y-4$, or that $\frac{x^2}{4} + \frac{z^2}{4} + 1 = y$.
ohhhhhhhhhhhhh, that makes so much more sense
thats why it's a circle
thank u so much man 🙏
.close
Closed by @simple seal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@crimson sedge Has your question been resolved?
@crimson sedge Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@crimson sedge Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @wintry plover
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
do you have any practical application of eulers theorm (the mod one)
yes in RSA encryption
@broken knoll Has your question been resolved?
are you asking for a practice problem?
Yup
uh
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
find the last two digits of 53^21348-71^34751
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
"In which points and for which/which choices of the constant d does the ellipsoid have
2x^2 + 7y^2 + 3z^2 = 57 and the plane 2x + 14y + 9z = d a common tangent point?"
can someone help me solve this?
2x^2/57 + 7y^2/57 + 3z^2/57 = 1
is this the correct first step?
I think you figure out the gradient first and then equate it to the tangent plane
4x = 2k
14y = 14k
9z = 9k
2x² + 7y² + 3z² =57
2x+14y+9z = d
So we have to find a common point that has also the same slope
In both the function and plane
@maiden venture Has your question been resolved?
Okay I get x=1/2, y=1 and z=3/2?
@maiden venture Has your question been resolved?
@maiden venture Has your question been resolved?
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
This should be our system of equations @maiden venture
k is any constant
6z = 9k*
sorry i was gone
Yes okay but am I not supposed to solve out x y and z now?
We gonna go this through hold on
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
So here
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
You follow?
I think so?
Ok
Now the same thing when we differentiate the tangent plane equation
Let's call it g
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
Ahh okay!
Yes I am
ok good
we need a constant because like in vectors
we need to find a certain scalar so that they not only have the same tangent plane
but also a common point
because the tangent planes can be parallel
but then not touch each other
Yes okay
hope u understand
I think I do
So this is how I came up with the first 3 equations
the other 2 are given
Yes that I understand!
Now we want to find a k so that they have at least the same tangent plane
So we solve the 3rst equations for x, y and z
$\begin{cases}
4x = 2k \iff x = \frac{k}{2} \
14y = 14k \iff y = k\
6z = 9k \iff z = \frac{3}{2}k \
2x^2 + 7y^2 + 3z^2 = 57 \
2x + 14y + 9z = d
\end{cases}$
Yes is x not k/2?
yes!
Oh yes!
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
Now we plugin x,y and z into the 4th equation anyway
because in the last one we would have one equation and two variables
so first we figure out the "matching k"
Okay so we get k + 14k + 9k = 24k?
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
Oh I put it in the wrong one
X=1?
go on
Or +-1
yes
Okay the first one is d=57
yes!
And the other one -57!
yes!
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
Also you already know your tangent points 🙂
Since we figured x, y and z
That should be it!
Okay so the answer is just when x= +-1 and so on for you and z?
And the common tangent point is +-57?
no that is the value for d
Oh okay
these are the common tangent points
look at the picture
Ohh I see!
yea you better see!
Haha thank you!
np!
.close
Closed by @maiden venture
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
!help
To ask for mathematics help on this server, please open your own help channel or help thread. See #❓how-to-get-help for instructions.
so a^2 +b^2 = c^2 right?
for a right angled triangle with c as the hypotenuse, yes
i need to prove for natural integers
a^n + b^n = c^n when n is greater than 2
prove or disprove
In number theory, Fermat's Last Theorem (sometimes called Fermat's conjecture, especially in older texts) states that no three positive integers a, b, and c satisfy the equation an + bn = cn for any integer value of n greater than 2. The cases n = 1 and n = 2 have been known since antiquity to have infinitely many solutions.The proposition was f...
that was pretty famously proven lol
ty
Lol
just normal hw
might also want to clarify your definition of N
cuz 0^3 + 0^3 = 0^3 lmao
no
how do i type : properly ?
thats not the question
but still
like x/y
?
its there a better way?
how do you type a division symbol?
yeah so its horizontal
like you would normally write
2hrs of sleep
anyways...
2 natural integers N and Q in a way so N/Q= 1 - 1/2 + 1/3 - 1/4 ...-1/1318 + 1/1319
prove that N is divisible by 1979
but i havent figured out the trick
i did
its close to logE I think
lan i mean
but sum/q isnt divisible by 1979
ty
any other question? maybe finding the nontrivial zeroes of the riemann zeta function that isn't along the critical line?
that too
pfft
we can split the prize money if you help me solve
i once read a book which says that anyone who is trying it for the money will 100% never solve it
that's the hardest way to earn a million dollars btw lol
i read a book that clams the red sea was split in half? and
if kai cenat has 10 grimace shakes and ishowspeed has 7 grimace shakes how many grimace shakes aidn ross get fanum taxed on?
only w answers get accepted
chess 1v1?
what elo are you
wanna guess?
too high
what is your lim
if your elo is any higher than 1600 im not playing
he's been playing for 1 year
no
based on his chat logs
I am up for that
im hypixel lvl 247
damn the chess player got summoned
yay
I am the chess player for a reason
let see what u got
poor guy lol
why delete the link?
@dapper heron Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Suppose s(n) denote the sum digit of n. If s(xy) >= y . s(x), can I say that s(yx) <= x . s(y)?
@swift saffron Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i am solving b, and answer for a is 278
I can get the angle ADB and the lengh of BD
and I am not sure how i am supposed to solve for the depression angle
@full forum Has your question been resolved?
@full forum Has your question been resolved?
@full forum Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why is the standard deviation based off of the mean and not the median? I am confused because the mean can be thrown off by an extreme outlier. Why isn't it based off of the median and then that extreme outlier is just deviating further?
as far as I know it's by definition
But why. I want to know why.
https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/448807/standard-deviation-around-mean-rather-than-mode-or-median#:~:text=I believe it is because,mean)%20of%20the%20random%20variable.
@worldly cedar Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I feel like this is wrong. A margin of error associated with the mean can only describe the mean values of the entire population, right?
Closed by @worldly cedar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I go from here?
I am trying to find out why the derivative of ln(X) is equal to 1/x by making use of integration by parts
Heya folks, I am trying to figure out why the derivative of ln(x) is 1/x and doing so by making use of integration by parts. Does anyone know where I can go from here?
<@&286206848099549185>
you’re integrating ln(x)
if you want to prove it, you can do it using the definition of the derivative
Integrate 1/x to ln(X)
I must do it by integration by parts
use the defintiion of e
What is that?
well you can't just assume the result you're tryna prove, to prove that result
uh
first principles
so f'(x) = lim x --> 0 ((f(x+h)-f(x))/h)
i mean you can try but
My teacher said so 😭
not sure if it’ll work
even if it will work
How come?
this aint the approach
since if ur tryna prove lnx = 1/x
you have to assume that you dont know it
and hence you really can't be using it in your proof
i mean you can def try it
choose 1/x to differentiate and 1 to integrate
but i’m not sure if that’ll go anywhere
yh
you need to use the definition of e somewhere
or the fact that e^x derivative is e^x
Why is my teacher like this
yeah so see, this doesn’t work
but this feels like cheating
But how can I do that to prove this
you are assuming that you know the derivative of ln(x) is 1/x
Yeah
definition of the derivative
That was what my teacher said
to clear it up, I have a presentation about partial integration
integration by parts*
there's a VERY elegant solution
which is why im doing all of trhis
I know I know
ok here
x = e^t
y = t
dx/dt = e^t
dy/dt = 1
(dy/dt)/(dx/dt) = dy/dx = 1/e^t = 1/x
use parametric equations
I already involved xe^x
boom
in my presentation
again I feel like this is cheating since ur basically getting the derivative of e^x for free
but i that the same as ln(x)..?
but it works
yes
Could you please explain how?
convert those parametric equations to cartesian coordinates
I see that you got 1/x as a solution
uhh
im not sure my class knows what that is
so the 2nd equation
im still in grade 11
arent cartesian coordinates the thing with complex numbers?
I saw it in a uni course at some point
just the xy plane really
but i dont think its a level material
do you know this formula
wait ur in a level
how is grade 11 a level
uhh
my a levels are next yeart to be fair
but here in Germany grades 11 and 12 are prep for a level
so you just say it like that
ok then I literally don't know how to help you prove lnx
you need either the limit definition
what other uses are there for integration by parts?
how do you know integration by parts but not the limit definition of a derivative?
other than integration products in which one is a polynomial
literally any integral with a product
that’s kinda weird ordering
yep
THIS IS WHAT IM CONFUSED ABOUT
but it kinda sucks unless one is a polynomial
prob weird syllabus
fr
I think I know the limit definition
but I learned it differently
one sec let me show you
(f(b)-f(x))/b-a
something like that
this I did last year already
with the lim x->a
that’s for f’(a)
but the one 2cap posted is more general
See me personally
the one you have wouldn’t help
odd
and my class is not exactly the brightest
our teacher is leading us into failure ngl
my grades have been dropping like crazy with her
but it is what it is
I have been sitting here brainstorming like this for the past hour or so
seems to be my only option
so in conclusion, there is no way to prove or exemplify the integration of 1/x to ln(x) via integration by parts whatsoever?
don’t think so
uh
if there is
it's prob WAY out of the spec
Probably
I'm pretty confident it's impossible to prove the derivative of lnx without either knowing the derivative of e^x and using it in your proof, or without the definition of e
so I should just stick to the integration of xe^x and xsin^x etc
What do you mean by the definition of e?
uh
the limit as x approaches infinity of (1 + 1/x)^x
oh yes
I did this in uni
but idt my class knows this 😭
yh so if you use the definition of derivative
this
and instead of f(x) if you put lnx
you can achieve a form similar to the definition of e
I can send you a vid of how to prove it in dms
could you explain to me how integrating x^2sin(x) works if I do integration by parts twice?
yes please
uh
ill definitely look into it for my personal understanding of the topic
but I doubt my class will be able to do anything with it
and you get uv - integral of vdu
x becomes 1
then the integral of vdu can be done by another IBP
oh yes
could I try that then send you my solution?
just to make sure that it is correct#
true
yh ill send you in dms
Wdym?
...
whatever ima still check
Closed by @fringe gust
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what is the area in the first quadrant bounded by y=e^(-x^2/4) and y=0
can use calculator
so write this as an integral
no need for calculator here
it's the integral from 0 to inf of e^(-x^2/4)
what do you mean?
yeah this is like a weird fresnel integral thing
unless op is aware of the gaussian integral
yh
or gaussian
fresnel is sin(x^2) or cos(x^2)
the answer choices just arent lining up though
yeah
firstly you want to make this like the gaussian integral
so you wanna take x/2 to be u
so that u^2 is x^2/4
it’s not from negative infinity to infinity
yh it's from 0
is it not just the integral of 0 to infinity of e^(-x^2/4)
yep
so u = x/2 will make this in the form of the gaussian integral
so this is 2 * the gaussian integral but from 0 to inf
ok can you guys compute it too, since its not coming up on any answer choice here
i mean then you can technically use the fact that $\int_{0}^{\infty}e^{-x^2}dx=\frac{\sqrt{\pi}}{2}$
y0shi
ye
that's what you'll end up doing
but then it's twice of that due to our substitution
no calculator needed since this is a standard result
whats the answer then, I dont even know what you guys did
so use u sub to get the integral we have into this form
ah gotcha
so the answer choices are wrong then, since none of these show up
1.7724538
@sweet marsh Has your question been resolved?
yes
Closed by @sweet marsh
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Could someone please explain this to me in an easy manner, I don’t understand what to do at all
Is this for a test?
Are you allowed help with it?
Yes I am
She told us to reach out to her if we don’t understand but she’s not responding to my email and it’s been over an hour 💔
I don't think that the circle is relevant here
imagine it as just the triangle, redraw it and label the sides
do you know SOHCAHTOA?
Yes
Okay, so once you've done what I've suggested, let me know if you are still stuck
and actually, this will just use the pythagorean theorem I believe, so not much trig.
Wait..
10 is the hypotenuse of this triangle, so how is the other side length 14?
that is not possible
Hmm
Perhaps they mean that the total side length of the hypotenuse is x+10
and 10 is just the upper portion outside of the circle
pythagorean theorem
np
.close
Closed by @half vigil
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
just ask the question bro
plug in 3 into x
and see if the LHS is equal to the RHS
for x = 3 to be a sol
putting 3 instead of x should make the equation true
I guess that's one way to do it
but
yes
upon replacing x with 3
if the left hand side does = to the right hand side
then x =3 is indeed a sol
otherwise no
Closed by @lucid kernel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why doesnt it equal purple? Purple is what i thought it should equal below that is what it equals
the -x in the numerator and the x in the denominator cancel out
I don't exactly know why you think it's what's written in purple, but that's what the next step was
combining the fractions and cancelling the x's
Alright what about this? I dont get how they get all of that. I would understand if it was just 2+x repeated 3 times and then -8 on all of it but this makes no sense
@void sand ^
Yeah but where did that even come from? How was (2+x-2) derived from (2+x)^3 -8
looks like a difference of cubes
x^3 - y^3 = (x-y)(x^2 + xy + y^2)
that's where it came from
man wtf our teacher didn't teach us that
.close
Closed by @pulsar turtle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
claim
Can I please get some help. I got suspened from school and now I have a test tomorrow
I dont undertand anything please help
Hey, for a quadratic we typically want it in the form ax^2 + bx + c
where a, b, c are constants
so a=1
b=2 (or 4)
c=9?
like solve?
Just do the math, no sense using a calulator
but yes (x-2)^2 is x^2-4x+4
add that 9 we had
and we now have ax^2 +bx +c
is -4 b?
the y axis you take what number you got from -b/2a and plug it in for x in this
thus we get the vertex
we have x^2 -4x +13 right
just generally agree
a b and c are the constants right out front of the variables
so
a=1
b=-4
c=13
(ax^2+bx+c)
Got u
cool
for x coordinate
for y coordinate
for maximum and minimum its also super straightforward
Yo I think i am the one thats cooked lmfao
and then we take this and plug in for x
i mean you can plug it into that yeah but its (2-(-2))^2 + 9
keep track of ur negatives
and remember it originally had a 9 on the outside
you can
Okay so just 2,9?
no
what is negative 4 divided by 2
-2
there ya go
^
why 9?
is (2-(-2))^2+9 = 9?
wack what
Am i cooked
I hate cpm so much bro like
anyways to solve b
Its so confusing
x^2 is a parabola, if the constant out front the x^2 is positive, it opens up (because it is all the positive y values) and if its negative, its all the negative y values so it opens down
so if a>0 it opens up, a<0 it opens down
imagine a parabola in your head. You just found the vertex, if it opens up is the vertex the minimum or maximum? If it opens down is the vertex the minimum or the maximum?
Is our vertex a minimum or a maximum?
sorry not b
part 2 of a
Its a minium
and b is just because a is positive it opens up, so our vertex is a minimum
Minimum
and minimum with positve x value coordinate mean it never cross x axis
ez stuffs
lastly
to find the roots of a quadratic equation we use to quadratic formula
classic equation, plug and chug
not fun by hand but most teacher allow you to use a calculator
useful to know so u can plug it in on a calculator without a button on it like a TI-30
anyways I hope you took a little away from this
if anything
ax^2 + bx + c for quadratics
i gotta do some limits for lin transforms of multi var calc problems sry, tedious stuff
i just hop on rarely to help a lil
i believe in you man
bro u just got all the info u need 😭
try googling a little
"how to find vertex of a quadratic equation"
bam
bam
Im just worried about this test ngl
If i fail i have another unit but I dont want to fail bro 😭
@smoky barn Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why?
Idk, this is the mark scheme
Sure but there's no minus, it was a mistake
It's just a +.
You do the conservation of momentum
Since the initial momentum is 4u, and new momentum is 2v + 4v (see graph), those momentums are equal
So 4u = 2v+4v = 6v
You computed v = 3
So 4u = 18
Are you able to help me?
There was no mistake, the CoM is in the direction to the right whereas CoM of A is pointed to the left
Slow internet
Ohhh
TYSM
@mental trail Thank you!
.close
Closed by @misty thistle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how would i do this
i wqas studying for my calc ab finals for saturday and doing practice problems and came across this
it doesnt seem to simplify nicely with u substitution
oh thuis is calc 2
thats why ni couldnt do it
wait
yeah this is bc material
idk how to do this then
.close
Closed by @kindred granite
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Is there a way you could do it with trig identity?
I don't think so
Okay. Thank you.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
,rotate 270
from the definitions
the relationship between first derivative with local extrema
and
inflection with second derivative
okk
don't forget that (2,11) and (1,5) are also points on the graph
I.e.
f(2) = 11
f(1) = 5
giving you two more equations to work with
solve the system
but the point of the system is to eliminate a variable
you have 4 equations with 3 variables which should be more than wnough
use a combination of Gaussian elimination or substitution
is this wrong
hrlp
@formal pasture Has your question been resolved?
you have two equatiions
7a + 3b = 6
6a + 2b = 0
solve that to get a and b
Closed by @formal pasture
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Point of inflection is (3/2, 30) because its the point where the second derivative is zero @formal pasture
but usually
its like cubic
and it shows how it changes
Yea original function is cubic, so the first derivative is quadratix and second derivative is linear
Quadratic*
no like
the point
of intersection
is usuallu shown
as a cubic
or smthn
to show it goes from smthn to smhtn
I dont understand what you mean could you explain
Closed by @formal pasture
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone walk me through this?
do you know law of sines
$\frac{x}{\sin\angle X}=\frac{y}{\sin\angle Y}$
BuboBlakistoni
i think you can plug the values into that
alr ty lemme try
law of cosines
I got 170 degrees for angle y using that equation which isnt possible
any other ideas?
So recall that sin(180 - x) = sin(x): this is true for any x
jesus christ, the deleted msg
Also you should get 160 degrees and not 170
so wouldnt that make this triangle impossible?
Yes, the triangle is impossible with 160 degrees
But sin(160) = sin(20)
