#help-13
1 messages · Page 270 of 1
35^2 / 2= v^2 / 2 +mgrsin(theta)
which i can rearrange to get v^2 = 35^2-25g sin(theta)
so using mv^2/r that should get me R right?
youll get mgsin theta
yeah
yeah
Have a great day!
same to you!
.close
Closed by @nimble ibex
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed by @marsh pond
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
big hint: the normal of the parallel plane is also the normal of the plane you want to find
.reopen
✅
wait so couldn't I just copy the exact same plane equation and just change the constant?
or would it only work with a certain constant
due to the point
I think I understand now
we just need to find the constant, that's all that will change
but not any constant
i will do the math to find that
.close
Closed by @marsh pond
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Did I do this right?
sounds good
sounds
good
can anyone expain the logic behind it ? i can't understand how he did it
consider a rectangle

Alr thanks everyone

.close
Closed by @winged grail
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed by @meager pike
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do you show that in a normed space $(X, |\cdot |)$ over the field $\mathbb{K}$, the sequence $(\alpha_n x)_n \to y$ where $\alpha_n \in \mathbb{K}$, $x\in X$ must mean that $y$ is a scalar multiple of $x$
CoolShot
i.e. a sequence of scalar multiples of a vector (if it converges) must converge to a scalar multiple of the vector
this is equivalent to saying that a 1D vector space is closed
there's many ways to go about proving this
for instance, that linear maps are continuous, and for every subspace, you can represent it as the kernel of a linear map
i attempted a basic proof but couldnt really finish it
i should have probably mentioned K = R or C this would probably simplify it
but then i think i can show that a_n is convergent
would this approach work?
do you know that ax -> a is continuous (with domain the line generated by x) ?
if you can show this, it works
well |a_n - a_m| ||x|| = || a_n x - a_m x || = || a_n x - y + y - a_m x || ≤ || a_n x - y || + || a_m x - y || which is bounded by some positive number after some N, so |a_n - a_m| is cauchy and C is complete, so convergent
i feel like im making some mistake here but i cant find one
it's not the sequence of differences that is cauchy
oh oops its just a_n that is cauchy
being explicit about that "some positive number" being any positive epsilon, no matter how small
Otherwise it doesn't imply Cauchy ?
yes right
i guess the problem is that ||x|| must be positive here
if it is zero then it works anyway but this works for positive
ok then thanks i figured the proof out
.close
Closed by @tranquil arch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
A+b+c
original problem pls
(a+b+c)^2
!xy
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
do you need to simplify
Yes
hint: (a+b+c)^2 = ((a+b)+c)^2
first consider (a+b) as an atomic thing
then use (x+y)^2 = x^2 + 2xy + y^2
@smoky heart Has your question been resolved?
этот сервер предназначен для плохих слов
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Differentiate the equation for the track, in terms of t.
Closed by @charred hedge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
so i think it helps if you think about multiplication of the complex numbers as being a dilation (like a streteching) together with a rotation
and when you write the numbers in that re^i theta form you can see immediately what the stretching factor is and what the rotation is
so if you have two numbers and you multiply them together (z and w) you would basically be multiplying their "r's" and adding their angles
so z * z would become r^2 e^(i (theta+ theta))
so what would be the magnitude (the r) in front of z^5 ?
yeah exactly, but the problem is also giving that z^5 = 2z which we can write as 2re^itheta, so this basically gives is r^5 = 2r
so we know from one hand the magnitude of z^5 is r^5, but we are also that the magnitude is 2r
since the magnitude of the number 2z is just twice that of z
i dont understand the left side of your equation
$z=re^{i\theta}$
Soosh
so when we raise to 5th power, because of thinking independently of the "dilation of the magnitude and addition of the angles" we can think of it as:
$z^5=(r)(r)(r)(r)(r)e^{i(\theta+\theta+\theta+\theta+\theta)}=r^5e^{i5\theta}$
Soosh
but we are also given z^5 = 2z, namely z^5 is a complex number that if you think of it as a R2 vector is in the same direction as z, which isn't trivial because most complex numbers when you are raising them to a power will be rotating them to some other random direction, but the magnitude is twice as much
$r^5e^{i5\theta}=2z=2re^{i\theta}$
Soosh
so all were doing now is like matching up the magnitudes (r^5 = 2r)
you can factor
and keep in mind r is real and positive
r^5 -2r = 0
r(r^4-2) = 0
now use diff. of squares:
r(r^2-sqrt 2 )(r^2+sqrt 2) = 0
so the right factor can't give us any real positive roots we can ignore that as well as r = 0 so look at
r^2 - sqr 2 = 0
use diff of squares again
(r - 4th root of 2)(r + 4th root 2) = 0
and the only positive real root seems to be r = 4th root of 2
now for theta, probably technically i shouldnt write theta on the right side of this, cause really whats happening is we are rotating by theta and we've gone all the way through 2pi and now come out to the same angle if that makes sense
and the problem gives you some range of values for theta
0 < theta < 2 so you know you are rotating counter clockwise (positive radians direction) with every multiplication
so you have something like 5theta = theta + 2pi
or 5theta = theta + 4pi
etc
but if theta < 2 you can't get all the way up to 4pi so basically the only option is
$5\theta = \theta + 2\pi$
Soosh
and thats easy to solve for theta
so basically z is some complex number where the angle is in first quadrant
when we are multiplying it by itself, we basically are adding some counterclockwise rotation of theta and also styretching (see every z^2 etc is growing in length until z^5 will be in the exact same direction as z but twice as long)
yeah so if 0 < theta < 2
then 0 < 5theta < 10
4pi = ~12 something so, this angle cannot possibly have made 2 full turns (4pi) is what i was trying to say
theta < 2 is given in the problem statement
so the only equation that would be valid would be 5theta = theta + 2pi
and that just gives us theta = pi/4 which checks out (i drew it with pi/4 in mind also, that's just at 45 degrees between the axes)
anyway long story short, this problem shows why this re^itheta form is useful and interesting with complex numbers, because when you are multiplying two numbers together you can directly see oh i just multiply their magnitudes together, add up their angles and thats the result of the multiplication, which you cannot see in the a+ bi form directly
but geometrically this is what multiplying two complex numbers is: a dilation/stretch + a rotation
oh im dumb lol
ok actually do the math correctly on this ^
4theta = 2pi, theta = pi/2 lol
i dunno why i was drawing pi/4 but was doing rotations of pi/2
but er yeah z is actually along y axis and then yeah its angle is pi/2 and each rotation is pi/2, oops
😅
it isnt though!
pi is 180 =\
but degrees are kinda crappy
worth getting used to radians
after basic geometry everything is just radians and for good reason 😄
its nice because for example:
if you have some angle theta around unit circle, then the arc length associated with that is the exact same measure
arc length of pi/2 radian angle is also just pi/2 length etc.
circle of radius 1, what the whole sin \ cos thing is based on
cos being the values of x of points on the unit circle and sin being the values of y of the points
for the unit circle yes

Closed by @vagrant sedge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
<@&286206848099549185>
@scarlet prism Has your question been resolved?
@scarlet prism Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @scarlet prism
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i dont really know what to do
This is new to me
<@&286206848099549185> I don't get it
@crimson sedge Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why is pt s not x,-y but x,y?
,rccw
any clues 🥲
"Just because", basically(!) It's the point they chose to start off with, so they chose to label it as (x,y)
So it doesnt matter, i can treat it as x, -y?
Wellllll, for the purposes of what they're asking you, not really: you're starting at S, not P
(if it was more general, then you could)
So what would the other coords be 😭
Like would point p be the opposite of s and it would be x, -y… 😭
Yep, point P would end up being (x, -y)
I suppose q is -x, y then
-x,-y
Yep 
Closed by @limber basin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help guide me im not sure what to do exactly. I suspect i need to take the laplace transform of P(D) but im not sure where to start. if someone could give me the first few steps i think i may be good...
well they tell you how to do it
use induction
consider the case where P(D) is of 0th order and prove the equality is true
then assume the above is true for P(D) of nth order, and prove it is true for n+1th order
i forgot how to use induction
https://www.khanacademy.org/math/algebra-home/alg-series-and-induction/alg-induction/v/proof-by-induction
if you feel like watching a video about it this is a good one. otherwise you can wait and hopefully someone will explain induction
Wait so for 0th order wouldnt it be equivalent to the laplace of y wrt s? Which eould just be equal to t? Is this related to the laplace transform of polynomials which is n factorial over s to the n plus. 1?
@long crow Has your question been resolved?
@long crow Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @long crow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hint: at its peak the velocity is 0
no
so first of all
take the derivative of h(t) so you can get the vertical velocity
no
or 0=-4.9t^(2) + 361t+304.
oh...I am really dumb give a sec to look everything over again
,, \dv t\9[\Big]{-4.9t^2 + 361t +304} = {???}
74.50 is my new time so do I plug that tim for t? is that what your saying?
do you know derivatives
or no
kinda
so we know h(t)
but we don't know v(t)
v(t) = h'(t)
so we take rhe derivative of h to get v(t)
and then we find t from v(t) = 0 which is t_1 for example
and then evaluate h(t_1)
ok
that's the entire question's steps
so like, i guess i need to ask you again what do u think this is
this is also a kinematic equation if you dont want derivatives
witch kinematic equation? I know that better.
I need to say this just be sure but what I am working on is Graphing Quadratics
you dont need to graph anything
yeah but this is a Graphing Quadratics thing that it falls under
i mean the question seems purely algebraic. You can directly find the vertex of the quadratic without all the stuff we did but that doesn't seem really intuitive for me
but you can graph h(t) in desmos and see where it peaks if you want that
ah if it will help get the answer then sure
for the quadratic $\6fx = ax^2 + bx + c$ the vertex of the quadratic is [
x_{\t{ver.}} = -\4b{2a}
]
if you want like a direct plug and chug you can do this

is that wrong?!?!?!?
you missed a - there
where?
a = -4.9
aight
there we go that looks better
ah!
t = 36.837
but Round answer to 2 decimal places it be 6953.03
,w evaluate 681397/98
I will put that in lol
now pray your school's obsession with significant figures and rounding doesnt bite you in the ass
try with the .03
WOOOO
Sorry for being so dumb! 😂
nah its okay
69 saves the day!
btw you know the vertex of a quadratic so this was like a direct plug and chug but if you have some random function instead here and you need to minimise/maximise it you havr to use derivatives and whatnot
so you shuld learn that

nice
Who are you?!?!?!?!
Austin
lol well, bye Austin and Qylo I will close now. Thank you for helping a dumb person like me! ❤️
Glad I could help
/close
.end
?close
/end
.close
Closed by @feral heart
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi guys. Please can someone help me solve this?
It’s basically sum of previous two terms + 5
I think you got that
Whats the problem
Okay thank you very much I was just making sure that I’m on the right track. Thank you kindly I’m extremely grateful for your help 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼
i think you need to double check the top 2 rows though (the first row you wrote in seems fine), you have 26 and 28 there so what is 26 + 28 + 5?
It would be 59 🙏🏼
The handwriting is beautiful
Then 28+34+5 will be 67
Really bad so sorry about that
It’s ok as long as the answer is correct
@lavish perch Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @lavish perch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone please tell me what i am supposed to do here I cant sit here and answer a million questions i have an exam in two days and i really need to move on from this practice exam question
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
<@&286206848099549185>
IDK
!15m
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
please don't ping us that early
it would also help if you posted the whole question 😐
all you've posted is some premise without a question
what are r1 and r2
@timid tiger Has your question been resolved?
U can apply the formula for magnitude of cross and dot product.
there is an equation that relates a dot product to the angle between the vectors
do you know what that is?
ok yes i did this but there is always a piece missing
for example if i use the cos one
its root 2= [v][u]costheta
if i use the sin one its
root6=[v][u]sintheta
right
Divide both
yes
Respectfully there is minus too
missed that, but yes there is a negative sign on the root2
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey
@still fable Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
what this.
Integral
not clear. the number and X
i mean. is there a clear and complete integral. i cannt see
I mean this option was given to us by the teacher, I don't know how to proceed. I wanted to decompose the denominator, but I can't do it
correct?
Yep
wtf. so complex https://www.integral-calculator.com/
Solve definite and indefinite integrals (antiderivatives) using this free online calculator. Step-by-step solution and graphs included!
I did the first and second task
but I can't do the third and fourth
Ohh
<@&286206848099549185>
@still fable Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@still fable Has your question been resolved?
@still fable Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I was able to show and conclude all that, I was just wondering, if I have T(x)=Ax, can I write
T^-1 as T^-1(x)= A^-1 x ?
it might be a rlly basic question, im j making sure
@rugged kestrel Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do you do normal distribution on your fx-991ex calculator for this question:
@dim terrace Has your question been resolved?
@dim terrace Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
you're not nawal..

do you know $\ds y = y_0 + v_{0y}t -\412gt^2$
damn physics
its a kinematic equation yes
so basically, you want to find when the ball hits again
meaning when y = 0
(vertical height is 0 metres)
so your problem is $\ds y_0 + v_{0y}t -\412gt^2 = 0$
set the origin to be 0 and y_0 disappears
you want to find the time now
initial height
you can define it however you want, y_0 = 0 is fine here
yes
v_0y is the initial speed in the vertical direction specifically
since velocity is a vector
you flipped them here
yeah
also
it's not -9.8
the - next to the 1/2 already implicitly deals with the direction of gravity
,w 27sin(60 degrees)t -1/2(9.8)t^2 = 0
u messed up
Closed by @vagrant sedge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how to do this im losing my mind
@thin compass Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
Is T just defined as the transpose or the matrix to the power of T?
transpose
the nullspace of transpose is just a single matrix
and i think you can just use the standard basis for the range right?
because transpose reaches everything in M
the nullspace is all vectors x1 x2 x3 where all those entries are equal to 0
x1 + 2x2 = 0
and x2 +x3 = 0
and -x1 + 2x3 = 0
any vector in R3 satisfying those equations is in the nullspace
and then using those equations you can find a proportion of the entries
and then define a basis for them using independent entries
you now have 4 equations to solve
and solving those will give you the proportions for x1, x2, and x3
which in that proportion
for example, not the answer, but it would be something like any multiple of (2,3,7)
which in this case immediately gives a basis
but in your case it might not
and you have to decide on a basis
for example you could have
that in order for the image of the vector to be the zero vector there is a relation between x1 and x2 which might be 2:1 so one of the basis vectors is (2,1,0) and then the other one is just (0,0,1) to complete the basis
in your case there is a single basis vector spanning the entire nullspace
i hope that helps
ok so your image of the map
is a matrix
with the four entries
and in order to get the 0 matrix
all entries need to be 0
and when the output is the 0 matrix the input is the nullspace
aka kernel
of a map
that make sense?
yes
right so you know that the output matrix has to equal 0 in all entries
meaning
$x_1 + 2 x_2 = 0$ and $-x_1 + 2 x_3 = 0$ and $x_2 + x_3 = 0$ and $x_1 + 2 x_2 = 0$ again
Katharine
still good?
ye
ok so in order for the vector $(x_1, x_2, x_3)$ to be in the nullspace of $L$ the entries: $x_1$, $x_2$, and $x_3$ have to fulfil those equations
Katharine
ye
Katharine
Katharine
that make sense?
ye
Katharine
meaning the vector is of the form
ah ok
$(-2 x_2, x_2, - x_2)$
Katharine
what do you mean?
like this part can have different answers
yes as long as they fulfil this
this is because you are asked to give a basis
and a basis multiplied by 2 is also a basis
or -1
or 7985034752098347509283475
although the last one might be completely infuriating to work with
okok
as long as your answer is
wait quick recap of how i do these type of questions
$\lambda \begin{pmatrix} 2 \ -1 \ 1 \end{pmatrix}$
Katharine
if your answer can be written as this
then you have given the correct basis vector
a correct basis vector
and the correct basis
okk
what you want to do for these type of questions
is figure out what the nullspace is
in terms of relations between entries of vectors
or maybe it is clear that only a single matrix can give you the 0 matrix
like in the first question
try to find the nullspace
what about the range
and after you understand what it is
similar idea
try to find it and understand it
and when you understand it you can try to find a basis for it
ok
what you did in b23 was not bad
how would u do it
for the nullspace i would do it like i explained
for the range i would basically try to do what you did
okok
and look for linear dependency
i don't know if you saw it but you can represent 1 of the 3 found matrices as a linear combination of the other 2
which is why the basis of the range has 2 matrices
instead of three or more
because you get three out
and 1 is linearly dependent on the other 2
@thin compass Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how would we factor 10w^2 - 31w + 15
no but basically were taught to find it by finding the possible factors
i’ll send an image
but i don’t get
like i did all the factors
oh
wait
hold up
gimme a sec
ik what i did wrong i think
wait yea no i don’t get it
ok wait i gtg actually
@eager wraith Has your question been resolved?
no you educational brat
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
You could reasonably add the 15 terms here
Oh wait, that says k = 5 on the bottom. That's weird, there's no k in there
Or maybe 3n + 26 is supposed to be a constant, and you're adding that constant to itself 15 times
Closed by @slender bridge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello i need help with bernoulli equation
@echo cedar Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Someone help
Try this
Ok
Try to bring rhs to LHS and try proving it to be 0
Uh
ur generally not allowed to do that
Oh.
My teacher always showed us to make one side equal to the other
for these kinds of proof problems ur supposed to only manipulate one side
I’m lost
Cot²x is?
Cos squared over sin squared
Cos²x/sin²x right?
on LHS i suggest convert everything into sine and cosine
after that u can prob do it on ur own
in general, when working with tan/cot/sec/csc, it is a good idea to convert into sine and cosine
Ok but can you stay with me just in case
Now take cos²x common on the numerator
What do you get?
This
Should I get common denominators
Say (a³/c)+(a²/d)
ahh i just joined i didnt know
Nah I’m kidding
im very sorry. my apologies
Ah
What do you call it in your country?
What I mean to say is that a/b+a/c is the same as a(1/b+1/c)
Perhaps paper might help?
Yes
Now that we're clear, let's proceed
You have (cos²x/sin²x)-cos²x
You can have cos²x common
Hey Vincent
Uh my mom is calling me
Thanks for helping me have a great night

@sturdy ferry Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @sturdy ferry
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
need help solving this
@lean oar Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Idk how to find the explicit form.
The implicit form is : (5y²+4)½/5 = x²/2 + C
from 2- a)
<@&286206848099549185>
i just explained it ...
the problem looks like calculus with derivatives
do you mean implicit differentiation? or...
I'm not sure what' you're asking about
yes
I want the explicit form
did u do the differential equation ?
what do you mean did I do the differential equaiton?
Which question from the page, I don't seem to find it
The question is not that important.
I already find the implicit form.
But i got stuck to find the explicit form.
That all is left is to simplify
Imma send a photo of what i did
Yes please
u see well right ? I see well from my computer.
when i check the answer
it said like this and i dont understand how
This is the answer given by the computer?
no by the book
it is the one where it writes « solutiion explicite » in 2- a)
What's wrong with that exactly?
idk where it comes the /20
You got the same implicit answer, I assume?
yes
Ok, let me try
k
It's just algebraic manipulation
ik but idk how to do at the end
yea
When you put for (x,y)
Closed by @lethal burrow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
they just joined the cos(x) terms and the sin(x) terms
oh yess i can see that now
what ab the right side though?
oh
is it because we are given a value with the cos on the orignal equation? but there is nothing mentioned for sin so its just zero for sin?
yes
Closed by @atomic tendon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i’m not sure if i’m solving for y correctly
This is the same for solving e^-x
i’m not following
are you saying e^-y is the same thing as solve for that, if so I know that i’m just not sure if i’m solving it right
the steps i’m not to sure about
You’ll get -e^(-y) +c
@hexed vortex Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do you even begin to solve this?
divide both the numerator and denominator by x
watch out, as x approaches -inf, |x| = -x
why divide by x?
thats the standard way to do rational limit
divide in the sqrt as wel
Fungus 34A05
ohh i thought i couldnt just take it out if its being subtracted from
You are right
so what should i do different from this
another way to look at it is $\sqrt{x^2-2} = \sqrt{x^2(1-2/x^2)} = \sqrt{x^2}\sqrt{1-2/x^2}= -x\sqrt{1-2/x^2}$
err
slayla
doing that here, the x’s cancel
Thats correct
what should I do after this point?
But x goes to negative infinity right
yeaah
since x < 0, square root of x^2 is -x
riight i see
So
Holon imma just show you
Lemme write
Here @prime island
At this point you can substitute the x
c/infinity is 0, where c is a constant
did we put in the square root of x^2 because there's a square rooted x in this problem?
yeah, there’s a square root of x^2
so since thats the highest power
we used square root of x^2
To make the other numbers be in the form of 1/x
then you can use this property
Mhm
wait so
if you divide the root x^2-2
by root of x^2
you can put them all under the same root?
yep
ooooh ok
Learn the radial rules
square root of 7 x square root of 4 is square root of 28
You can multiply them if they’re under a root
Closed by @prime island
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im not understanding why the lower limit of dy is x^2 and upper limit is 2x
and not vice versa
when doing dy, we are taking small increments in the y axis and seeing how x changes with y right??
the bounds of integration tell you what area you want to integrate over
note that we want the area between y = 2x and y = x^2
if you plot this out on the xy plane, you whould get something resembling this
where the blue line is y=2x, and the red is y=x^2
now you always implicitly assume x is moving right and y moves upwards
yes
Closed by @tough karma
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi I was wonderinghow to do part c and if i did a and b correctly
@marsh rain Has your question been resolved?
@marsh rain Has your question been resolved?
@marsh rain Has your question been resolved?
@marsh rain Has your question been resolved?
@marsh rain Has your question been resolved?
@marsh rain Has your question been resolved?
Hey @marsh rain I was playing around with this on stream today. I think I can help with (a) and (b) but was unsure what (c) was asking tbh
So I feel confident based on your work that you understand part (a). For part (b) what did you end up getting?
Also there is likely an error in part (c), the third term is missing a $\sin$
Hello! I actually just woke up rn so it'll take a little bit for me to get back to you . Thank you so much though!
Ohh in that case would you know how to solve it?
for (b) my answers on the far bottom of the age. product of a bunch of quadratic factors following the rule (z^2-2cos(2npi/(2n+1))x+1)
How would you do Part c
im wondering too. i think i just need to know where to go from b since it says hence
Yeah I wasnt sure what was going on in part (c) but my chat definitely thought there was a potential error
Right this seems good!
Im sure the cosines I got simplify somehow, I was just too lazy to do it 😅
thats all good. i might ping the helpers to see if anyone has any idea
<@&286206848099549185>
whar is this written on
@marsh rain Has your question been resolved?
N belongs to?
For part c
is this a question about the question itself. bc i have no clue sorry
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
B is a matrix of order (3*2), where aij= 3i-2j
1<=i<=3
1<=j<=2
Express B in matrix form
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
Nope but I might just close it atp
hmm
i might be able to help
i saw how you proceeded it
its actually right
like i have a more of a solution mindset
and 3rd expression also rings a bell
but i wanna know do you have the answer
like the expression?
the thing is if you have to do the cube root of 1 its possible
or if you have to do 4th root of 1 its possible
but its too vague
but worry not i have solution for that as well
its basically asking about the roots of 1
Yeah I'm just blanking on what exactly to do 😭 also I might be a bit unresponsive right now since i have an English essay due tomorrow but pls give some insights if u have any
ok no problem
i can totally help with this
im sure
so i think you shouldnt keep this channel held up anymore
Are you asking if we can work with it in the solution? I think we can
coz its been open for quite some time
i like to do it that way
Yeah it's been a couple of days lmfao
coz i can get whether you can understand it properly or not
so close it for now
and open it later or
dm me
i can help
take your time no rush
im just giving you options dont think of me as a creep pls
lol
Okayy tysm is it okay if I get back to u tomorrow
ok no problem
Lmfao no worries just want help
Thanks!
.close
yeah thanks
Closed by @marsh rain
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
What I have done in the above steps is, first I've broken down -5x into two terms in such a way, that if I multiply the two split terms I will get the same product as if I multiplied the square and constant.
I.e. (-2x)(-3x) = 6x²
And (x²)(6) = 6x²
Then, I've taken common terms between the first two and last two terms.
And the last step is taking common the terms again
u need help?
or is ur doubt solved?
@warm jackal do u need help?
No need, thank youu!
!done
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
@warm jackal !done
The channel is already closed
It was never opened for Hylexia
@mortal forum @orchid field
@rawra .close this channel
@bleak flax
.close
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do you do differentials?
@chilly raft Has your question been resolved?
@chilly raft Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
<@&286206848099549185> sorry to be a bother but can I please get help I don't get any of it
@chilly raft Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello all
How to solve: cos(arcsin(sqrt(2)/3)
NO idea where to begin this one…
Please help. Struggling. -Joebeard
@idle tusk
Spoke to Moses. He said you might be able to help. Moses says: “Hello Arte”
🙂
sssssssssssvvvvvvvvvvccccccccccc
@tight thorn Has your question been resolved?
