#help-13
1 messages · Page 256 of 1
@strong dawn Has your question been resolved?
It’s a specific coordinate transformation, Normally they’re written in the form x’ = Ax but it looks like this is already solved https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_common_coordinate_transformations
But actually not really because it’s a projection onto the sphere not redefining the coordinates, so something is normalized, presumably rho=1
yes but, this formula was created to have a more uniform distribution of points, I've used it in my project for school and if there is like someone who invented it I should probably refference it. but I don't know how it's called
Where did you find it?
@strong dawn Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @strong dawn
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
for this problem wouldn't I technically be able to convert it into a diff equation and solve it normally
because y prime is dy/dx right
,rotate
you could, but that's not what the question asks lol
but that is just a separable ODE
yeah ik I was just curious
thanks though
.close
Closed by @lone dune
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im a little confused about how to use the wronskian to show linear independence of t and t^2
so i calculuate W(t) = t^2 wehich makes sense, but there is this idea that my professor mentioned in class that if there is a t0 is in the interval s.t. W(t0) = 0 then W(t) = 0 for all t in I (and likewise for not equal to 0) but i am confused since t can take on values that both equal to 0 and not euqal to 0? For instance W(0) = 0 but W(1) = 1.
Let me know if you know whats wrong with my reasoning, thanks!
@undone onyx Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@undone onyx Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi, im trying to find $r_x$ given $r(x,y,z) = \sqrt{x^2 + y^2 + z^2}$
lewis_f04
i assume i can set $f(x,y,z) = x^2 + y^2 + z^2$, and then $r_x = \frac{1}{2}f(x,y,z)^{\frac{-1}{2}} \cdot \frac{\partial f}{\partial x}$
lewis_f04
is this correct? as in does the chain rule work this way in partial derivatives, ive consulted google and my lecture notes but they use examples where x y and z are functions of t, which is not the case here which makes me doubt
<@&286206848099549185>
Okay, respectfully, what the fuck is that math (I’m not saying it’s wrong I’m just shocked lmao) 😭 sorry but I couldn’t even begin to help with this. This makes me feel so dumb lmao.
weirdness 🙂
@jade sonnet Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
In the second to third line where does the h at the complete bottom disappear
Cause at first everything is over h
Then the h goes away I don't understand why
The h is at the very end of the denominator.
@slow rock Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
any function just defined on positive integers can be extended to the real numbers and be continuous
but there are many ways to do it
like one thing you can do is just connect the points with lines
but is that any use to you, idk
hmm.. i just wonder how imaginary number works
that equation is same as this
here's some examples
any positive number converges, but negative is not
It sounds like natural but it interests me
it generates random numbers!
my point is, i want make this to continuous function like a gamma function, but i don't even know how to approach this problem
Is there anyone who can solve this problem?
.
i forgot one more thing, that this equation results in different graphs depending on the initial value
It's not a hardest problem on you guys, right...?
i think it seems there's no pattern even when using Taylor series
@devout frost Has your question been resolved?
@devout frost Has your question been resolved?
@devout frost Has your question been resolved?
I guess that all difficult problems stem from simple ones
even an elementary school student can calculate this problem, so can you solve?
can you find a pattern?
My math skills are worse than a patrick
i found something funny!!
this equation
is same as
this!
because of substitution
i think this is a big hint for this problem
it's chaos
this equation term graph looks like this
it has a pattern
i am waiting for you guys...
i really really want to make continuous function with recursive equation terms
@devout frost a different recursive equation that might help you come to terms with this question is the logistic equation.
$$
x_{n+1} = r x_n (1 - x_n)
$$
This particular recursive equation's behavior varies as a function of the free parameter $r$.
全能の存在
And exhibits chaotic behavior if r is large enough.
You have simply discovered another chaotic, nonlinear recursion.
Essentially. Because of your recursion's sensitivity to initial conditions.
Though
.close
Closed by @devout frost
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
If you really want to try hard
You might be able to do at least some investigating using generating functions
But I doubt you will make much headway
Best of luck!
👍
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@wraith mauve Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @wraith mauve
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
<enumitem>
We are given the following five facts about a discrete-time signal $\bm xn$ with $z$-transform $\m Xz$:
\begin{enumerate}[label=\alph*), font=\bfseries]
\ii $\bm xn$ is real and right-sided
\ii $\m Xz$ has exactly two poles
\ii $\m Xz$ has two zeros at the origin
\ii $\m Xz$ has a pole at $z = \412e^{j\omega \ff\pi3}$
\ii $\ds\m X1=\483$
\end{enumerate}
We need to determine $\m Xz$ and specify its region of convergence
Okay, so my logic with this is that: Since x[n] is real, the two poles must be complex conjugates of each other
So like
I am thinking something like [
\m Xz = \4{Az^2}{\p{z-\412e^{\ff{(j\pi}3}}\p{z-\412e^{\ff{(-j\pi}3}}}
]

A is a constant to be determined™️
but is this right structurally so far 
™️

anyways doing some
algebruh
you get A = 2
for the region of convergence im guessing its like
$\abs z >\412$
because its right-sided

ok i think its right
bonk me if im not @sacred grail 
.close
Closed by @lone wigeon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
i dont remember how this stuff works so good luck 

Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
for number 2,
ive created a set Ap = {|u| in X | f(|u|^p > c^p}
then i say integral_x f dm >= 1/c^p (integral_Ap f dm) >= m(Ap)
Could I also say this is an increasing sequence of sets that converges? so i could create a simple function that goes 0 <= g <= u
These are both, in fact, just an application of Markov's inequality, and a potential simplification
By that I mean there's simpler than what you're trying to do
Which I either didn't understand, or understood to be wrong
im just following my notes from a proof that uses the markov inequality from lecture
i get i made a mistake with the set notation
Well then try to correct it
doing it
ive created a set Ap = {x | f(|u(x)|) > f(c^p)}
then by markovs inequality right? m(Ap) <= 1/c^p integral f(|u(x)|)dm
That's one f too many but yeah
show me please, so i can be precise
im not sure where the one too many f is 😛
f(c^p) is just f(c) or c^p
Closed by @meager pike
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do you find the standard deviation?
@upbeat token Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
isn't it the average distance each point is away from the mean?
so you take the square of each points distance from the mean, and sum up those values. Then divide that by the number of data points, and take the square root of it.
so if you had a set like: 1, 2, 3, 6. it's average is 3.
Then (3-1)^2+(3-2)^2+(3-3)^2+(3-6)^2=4+1+0+9=14. Divide that by the number of values which is 4, so 14/4 or 7/2. Then you take the square root of 7/2 which is around 1.87 and that's your standard deviation
now do that but with your data set
@upbeat token Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
<@&286206848099549185>
Its not an option
What are the options?
I got 15√17
9 root 17
wait a mint i'll send you a full solution
kk thx
yes its true
.close
Closed by @real tree
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
alrighty so as long as I am not stupid Ive set up the Lagrangian functions and differentiated in regard to x, y and lambda but I am kinda stuck on how to solve this set of 3 equations.. i assume its simple as hell and im just being stupid but im like actually lost rn haha
@vast fable Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185> :3
it won't always be simple. it goes long pretty often
it was a mock exam question with 10 points so it should be solvable within 10 minutes - the solution is x=20 and y=24 but im struggling to get there...
sure thx
it didn't take even 2 minutes here lol
alright so first differentiate the equation wrt x.. and then differentiate the constraint wrt x and multiply the value by lambda
then equate those
that'd be your first
(its the exact same thing but it just goes faster)
do the same with y, same variable lambda
equate both by taking y/x as t and then you get a value of t, which you use to develop a relation between x and y (which I did get), then substitute in the constraint and you'll get the x = 20 and y = 24
try what I said first, else ill simplify it
because I did that and it happened
aight ima give that a try, only problem i see is that my prof made it very clear that we need to use the method he told us to use and not go different routes if we want to score points on the exam
so id assume he would want me to actually write it down the way i did in the 2nd pic and go from there
its lagrange multipliers but just simplified it down
ok
Closed by @vast fable
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help with this sequence im stuck with this question for almost 2 hours now
i tried arithmetic sequence but it doesnt work
hint: explicitly express 1 and 2 as fractions with a numerator of 2
hmmm
wait
alr
misread the value
yea maybe its meant to be 1/2? there are nothing i could think of with this little terms thats not crazy
there doesn't actually seem to be a clear rule here
thats why im stuck here for almost 2 hours trying to figure this out
potentially some typo somewhere,
skip imo
lmao i think they wanted to write 3/2 and 5/2
yeah i think its 50.5 if switched
interesting
Closed by @fickle arrow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone please help with this question?
do you know about AM-HM inequality
I don’t think so no, could you please explain?
what about AM-GM
Also no, sorry
None I think 😓 I haven’t done them formally, I’m trying to do that now with a textbook. So far all I’ve been taught is that I should try using square numbers, knowing they are greater than 0 and rearranging
The hint tells me to let 1/x = u etc and go from there, but I don’t see how that would help me?
@gaunt badge Has your question been resolved?
@gaunt badge Has your question been resolved?
@gaunt badge you know the fact that x+1/x>=2?
Its the same as
$$ (x+y+z)(1/x+1/y+1/z) >= 9 $$
A shot
Opening it you get $$ 3+x/y+y/x+x/z+z/x+y/z+z/y >= 9 $$
A shot
And it is easy to prove
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how come?
Yes
let me try
(a^x)^y = a^(xy)
Np
@crimson sedge Has your question been resolved?
@crimson sedge Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
am I supposed to give an explicit formula?
How do I start this question
do I do prove by induction and prove n+1?
hm
I found some videos that might help
I'll try it out first
@fervent pike Has your question been resolved?
working on it now
there's a reasonably obvious pattern
try making a formula for the pattern and then proving that it's the correct formula
by induction
the bottom left, I tried to write a formula based on the relationship between numerator and denominator
I need to replace n with somth else
n is just placeholder for now
either that, or on the right side, I tired writing a formula based on relationship between the terms
Im sort of stuck on that idea, so Im going with the bottom left idea... trying to find smth to replace the placeholder rn
that ain't it
here's a hint: look at the differences between the terms and 1
notice the pattern
difference is alternating series
and denominator of each term is doubled from previous
ok
so can you try and describe that with a formula
almost right
wait no that is right, i thought it would start at n = 0 not n = 1
wait no
ok
so try n = 3
then that would be -1/2^2 + 1
which is 3/4
so it's not quite
sure
then in fact you can also say (-1)^(n-2)
and make it just
(-1/2)^(n-2)
because (-1)^(n-2) = (-1)^n, to be clear
ahh ok
(-1/2)^(n-2)+1 now I should do a proof by induction to verify the formula
would you assume an with the formula I found? or use the given..
@azure horizon
yeah just shove it in
so suppose an=(-1/2)^n-2+1 and prove an=(-1/2)^n+1-2+1?
oh wait
let me try it out first
damn
ism making some sort of error
@azure horizon
I dont know I cant see it???
@fervent pike Has your question been resolved?
skipping that question for now..
would this be a fibonacci sequence? and finding an explicit formula... its prob best to just remember it right
<@&286206848099549185>
also, if someone can please help with the last one it'd really appreciated
AHHHHHHHH
I got it
I think for both questions
ohhmyyygooodness
yea so for the last one, I was supposed to use n-3 not n-1 for exponent (you can see at the start of calculation) and this one, yes its fibonacci, I use char root method to solve the recurrence relation
BOOM
lol okokkokok
@fervent pike Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @fervent pike
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how can i prove values of p
What have you tried
tbh i dont even know
how to start
i thought of doing the integral test
then isolating for p for values that converge maybe?
not really sure though tbh
Integral test is the right idea
alright ill do that from 2 to inf
ok i have no idea if i did this right at all
i got lim n approaches inf of p(ln((lnx)^p) bounded by 2 to n
nvm
i got 1/1-p of the integral bounded by 2 to inf of u^1-p
thats definitely right now
Not really
The bounds should have changed
And you did u = lnx right?
So it's not u^1-p
its ln x^1-p yes
Where does the 1 come from?
So don't say 'integral' when you ve already integrated
Just .... evaluated at bounds ....
alright cool
Closed by @blissful summit
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how did they get from this to that?
and i dont understand how to use little o notation
i know what it is but i dont understand how can it be useful
<@&286206848099549185>
Easy
So first I want you to get in the zone, mentally prepares
Train your mind, jog ur memory with some meditation for 5 mins
After that
what
Watch this video
he's trolling, ignore him
All explained above ^^
isnt this bannable
Chill
I'm just joking
So first you wanna make it integrative right
Integratable *
So u know ur limits right?
what they did here is used $\sum_{i=1}^{\infty}x^n = \frac{1}{1-x}$
doaby
replace x with $-t^{-1/2}$
doaby
this should start from i = 0, my bad
hmm
ohh
ok so they took out the t^-1/2
and they used taylor on that
but why is there little o?
i dont understand how to use it
yep! but that formula is only valid for $|x| < 1$, so gotta be careful
doaby
careful of what
like if your range for t is outside of that interval, equality doesn't hold
so depends on your bounds of integration
but that's being pedantic lol
little o notation goes like this. say you have this series:
$\sum_{i=1}^{\infty}x^n$
you can rewrite this as
$1 + x + x^2 + x^3 + o(x^3)$
this was the question
doaby
little o is just like saying ... after the x^3
it means powers higher than 3 in this case
using taylor series here is actually a bad idea
huh
so
it is a way to say like ...
like 3 dots
pretty much
why
because that formula i showed you here is only valid if |x| < 1
but your bounds of integration depend on x, which is going to infinity
so if x is like 10 for example, your integral goes from 0 to 20, which is outside of this interval
im not rlly understanding the reasoning
so ifu get that question
from the beginning
what would u notice?
i would start by probably just multiplying by the conjugate
since i see something added to a square root in the denominator
or you could try some u-substitution shenanigans, just anything to eliminate the square root
so the steps i sent at the beginning arent the best?
no, and in fact they'll give you the wrong answer
huh rlly
by the reasoning i gave above
my prof did this
is he trying to approximate the integral? or find an exact value?
this is the most handwavy argument i've ever seen lol
it might've worked out in the end but it could've easily gone very wrong
so u saying that guy is a lucky boy
or myb he just saw its gonna work
but ye i dont understand anything and i wanna cry but i got no time to cry
i just did the integral in like 2 seconds using u substitution
so u r saying that i should try to get rid of the square root
i tried to use u sub before but i got nowhere
myb i didnt do it correctly idk
should i try multiply by the conjugate
oh where did you get
hmm
worked for me
ok then im just bad
i'm sure it was just an algebra mistake
wanna hop on a call rq
it happens
imma share my screen
no i'm busy irl
no im just bad cuz idk how to do this stuff
aight
just send a ss of your work
wanna hop on a call no mic just so u see my screen
imma do it on paint with a graphic tablet
just the integral
nah man i got it wrong cuz idk how to actually do it
thats the way i did it but its obviously wrong
i cant have a sqrt(t) there
but idk how to do it
@mortal grove ping
almost but you want everything in terms of u. so what is sqrt(t) in terms of u?
ohh bruhhhh
ye aight imma try it
??? does this make sense
am i still missing sometihng
oh ye lmao
wait
i got this?
now i think its correct
and now i got that does it make sense
@mortal grove i hope its fine if i ping u
that looks right to me. now just substitute t back in and plug in your limits
nice so its good
dont i have to do the integral before?
everything you did is fine. but now you have to evaluate that at your limits. to do that, you need to convert back to t since your limits depended on t
alternatively, you can change your limits of integration using u = 1 +sqrt(t)
so at t = x, u = 1 + sqrt(x)
and at t = 2x, u = 1 + sqrt(2x)
those would be your new bounds
both ways are valid
i got that plugging in t
oh so now i just plug in 2x instead of t
minus the same but with x
and then i do the limit
im stuck again
i got to here
(there's missing a 1+ in the log)
@vocal mauve Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
At
Except from these two green points, that you are able to find it after putting in a corresponding inputs.
.close
Closed by @civic coral
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone help me with logarithms?
I’m looking for a simple explanation I can give ya a precise example 😭
alright
You know how it is in math class when the teacher got a thick accent?
yuh
I’m struggling
right
Alr alr hollup
These are my teachers notes, do you think you could explain it to me a bit?
All good

I’m trynna see if I can find any other notes
Text is blurry asf golly
This what I’m looking for?
This algebra math video tutorial focuses on solving exponential equations with different bases using logarithms. This video contains plenty of examples and practice problems and is useful for students who are taking algebra 2, college algebra or precalculus.
Logarithms - The Easy Way!
https://www.youtube.com/watch...
@rigid dust Has your question been resolved?
No
@rigid dust Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone please check my work
<@&286206848099549185>
@fast arrow Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @fast arrow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone tell me how can I even start this?
apply factor theorem
Closed by @gloomy delta
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
idk what I'm getting wrong here
should just be a number right?
should be t
t?
yeah because where did the x come from?
think the derivative is wrong too though
actually nvm
but yeah, your stuff has t's, there was never an x
oh
wrong variable
used to doing math with x
is there a diff between f'(a) and f'(t) then?
yeah
just replace t with a
its like if it asked for f'(5)
a is just some number
what??
oh
mb
how do I start?
ik it's smth along the lines of finding a slope but along where?
Im assuming 40-60
you could ig, i would just draw the tangent line, if thats possible
but since its quite straight there, relatively
itll give a good enough estimate
Id only get the slope out of it no?
or is that enough info to proceed?
slope is 25
@digital cliff ?
Result:
25.5
so the slope is f'(50)?
well, the slope of the line joining the the points at x=40 and x=60 is an estimate for f'(50) which is the slope of the tangent to f at x=50
its an estimate, not the value itself
it only works because f is almost linear between 40 and 60
@sick fossil Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @sick fossil
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey just wondering where I went wrong in this problem. I did not get the right solution doing the problem this way but doing it a different way I did find the right solution. I just want to know what is wrong about this way.
This is the way that yields the correct answer and the only difference is factoring one more time in the denominator before moving to partial fraction decomposition
If you substitute $x=sec(\theta)$, you get $\int \frac{sec(\theta)tan(\theta)dx}{sec^{2}(\theta)-1}$
smidgin
Yep
is there a way to solve that integral using trig sub or nah
i mean i know that integral is equivalent to inverse tanh but i forget how to get there
$\int \frac{sec(\theta)tan(\theta)dx}{sec^{2}(\theta)-1}=\int \frac{sec(\theta)tan(\theta)dx}{tan^{2}(\theta)} = \int cosec(\theta)dx$
smidgin
would i use u sub sec maybe?
ah real
so just go about it without the root
makes sense
Yes, and don't mind the dx instead of dtheta
nvm this is stupid this would take me back to where i was
Yeah, you just did the sub x=sectheta so you'll just undo your u sub
yep
Yeah so then I get this
only difference is inside the natural log but you can flip the sign of the numerator and denominator due to the absolute value right
so then you get the same answer as the other method
Alr cool thanks just a simple mistake in the end
.close
Closed by @rose tinsel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
1
Do you know that when speed is constant, speed=distance/time?
sure
Use that here, write what is given into equations
what is the distance and speed
They have given us a relationship between the times taken, in the second case.the time taken is 4.5 hours lesser when his speed increases by 2kmph
Ok, so first start off by rearranging this to get
time = distance/speed
ok
Ok, so suppose the time taken in the first case is x and in the second case, it is y
What is the relation between x and y?(hint: it takes 4.5 hours lesser when the speed increases by 2 kmph)
idk
We aren't told what the speed is either, so let's say the speed is s
aight
x=108/s
yup
Do you agree?
yuhh
Now let's increase the speed to s+2. we know when the speed is s+2, the time taken is y
So y=108/(s+2)
ye
Put x and y here
ok
(108/s)-4.5=108/(s+2)
Can you solve this equation now?
Closed by @rocky thunder
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do u find the distance between the intersecting points of red and blue?
the pic is just an example
what do you mean by distance
like the difference in x values, or the length of the curve
distance of each intersecting point between each other
-5<x<5, 8sinx+3=0
i mean like a picture
its the answer
why did you send me the answer
because i dont know how to do it?
i mean
i asked you to send me the question
and you sent me the answer
i dont understand what is happening
this is the question
@marsh lake Has your question been resolved?
@marsh lake Has your question been resolved?
@marsh lake Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
do you have any x values that meets 8sinx+3=0?
Find the x values of the intersection points, say x1 and x2, and the distance between them for this particular instance (one of the functions is a horizontal line) is |x1-x2|
@marsh lake Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What is the solution to this?
I got one answer, wolfram got a diffirent and my professor got a diffirent
well show your working
The answers may be same, it could be possible that the way of representation is different
this is same as wolframs answer
replace n by n+2 in the first set of solutions WA gave you to convince yourself of that
ok, but what is my professor doing that i am missing?
and in your working, the reason why your answer is different is because (2x+pi/3) = arccos0 + 2pin or
-(2x+pi/3) = arccos0 + 2pin
you forgot to distribute the minus sign
or wait let me rewrite it
very much likely because arccos0 = pi/2
and 5pi/6 very much cannot be written as pi/6 + 2pin
And i guess i can rewrite that as 7Pi/6
yes, mod 2pi
I dont know what mod is
But it seems like its the most basic answer for a periodic function
Ok but still now
I dont have the same solutions
At the very last part of my professors solution they have +Pi/2n, where does that come from?
what?
Before we continue, you now have the solutions on the left of "eller" correct?
Correct
so start from the right, x = pi/12 + pi/2*n
if n is even, n = 2p
and so x = pi/12 + pi*p
if n is odd, n = 2p+1
so x = 7pi/12 + pi*p
here are the two cases, brought into a single one
Wait so the left side of ”eller” means the same thing as the right side?
yes
Ahhhh
Thank you
Ahhh that was confusing
He basicly said: ”its ok to answer like this too”
?
yeah
because in both cases you give explicitely the correct values of x
it's just that the second answer (right side) is more compact
it's like answering "x is an even integer or x is an odd integer" instead of "x is an integer"
@undone crypt Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can somoen help me with 2
@subtle hinge Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @subtle hinge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
can someone pls solve that
@subtle hinge Has your question been resolved?
@subtle hinge Has your question been resolved?
the no. of distinct terms will be the highest power of x +1
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
sqrt(n+1) + sqrt(n) > 2sqrt(2) might help you, try and see why
oh wait
yea so deno is bigger hence why the value is smaller
damn
ok
thanks
.close
Closed by @fervent pike
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
✅
so I’m going to go back to a question I did yesterday
I used a different method to find a closed formula for the recurrence relation
and now I’m trying to prove my formula is correct by induction
I would like some guidance as to if my methods and process are correct
and how I can simplify my equation to get a_n+1
wtf are you doing
where did 12 come from
what is 5
what happened to the other formula
yea so im trying a new method I found on youtube, characteristic root technique
the thing isn't right though
like try n = 1
wait no
wait yeah
try n = 2
12 (-1/2)^2 + 5 = 3 + 5 = 8
check your workings
n=1, n=2 is provided tho
this formula needs to work with the given values too right
yes
wtf so this method is wrong??
no
you probably did the workings wrong somehow
so the characteristic root method lets you say
a_n = A(-1/2)^n + B right
you got that?
did you get that
so you just need to substitute
i see
did you get it?
4 and 1
should be an = 4(-1/2)^n+1
yea
thats right
also, this is gonna sound really stupid but how can I simplify this? to match 4(-1/2)^n+1 +1
,tex .exp rules
riemann
i cant get it to match for some reason🥲
oh
YASSSSSSS
ok
we good
lol thank you guys soooo much
@fervent pike Has your question been resolved?
@fervent pike Has your question been resolved?
if a sequence (an) has finitely many terms outside the interval (a-eps, a+eps) and infinitely terms inside, that would be convergent?
and divergent is if the above property does not hold?
is eps fixed?
what do you mean?
is there a $\forall \eps > 0$ somewhere
riemann
or is it a fixed number like $\eps = 0.01$
riemann
Im trying to understand what its saying here
Im gonna try to read more about it...
not really understanding whats happening here
What they're saying is that if you have this, that there are only finitely many terms of a(n) outside the interval, the sequence converges to the limit a...
But saying that there are infinitely many terms in that interval doesn't necessarily imply that there are only finitely many outside the interval
Assumedly they took the sequence (-1)^n as their example 4.1? Note that for that, you have all the even terms as 1 and the odd terms as -1
So you have infinitely many terms "close to 1" and infinitely many terms "close to -1", but, if you shrink your interval small enough (say being within eps = 1), then you have infinitely many terms that are in each interval, and infinitely many terms that aren't
that would be divergent tho, no?
Yes, (-1)^n is not convergent
so what I'm saying here is true?
If you can't find any a so that you have this true (for any eps > 0), then sure
(however, be a bit careful: if you have a specific "a" such that it isn't true, that doesn't mean the sequence doesn't converge, all it means is that it doesn't converge to the specific "a" you chose)
ok, so then that would just mean you chose the wrong 'a' then
so by definition, convergent sequences that converges to a has infinitely many terms inside (a-eps,eps+a) and finite outside
and if not, then its divergent or you chose the wrong a
Not convergent to [that] a
(it might be, either you chose the "wrong" a, or that there might be no such a where it's true, it could be either one)
if you have no such a where it is true then wouldnt that be divergent then?
made an edit
Better 
and if you have set of numbers in a sequence denoted like this, {an}, its not the same thing as a set right? because you can have numbers repeating
no it is written like a set
right
thats what was confusing me
Strange they're mixing their notation, the (a(n)) and {a(n)} 
You are right that terms in a sequence do not need to be distinct
back in an hour or two
@fervent pike Has your question been resolved?
@fervent pike Has your question been resolved?
i just went to a meeting and then took a longggg break
damn i really need to get back to work
exam tmr😱
would this be right?
again theres no solutions to the textbook im using
I dont know what to doooo
<@&286206848099549185>

idk😭 😭



