Channel closed
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
1 messages · Page 250 of 1
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is there a way to prove that a function is one to one without the horizontal line test?
whats g(x) when x is infinity
you gotta be more specific
wdym
it is +infinity
oh
now use the fact that g(x) is an odd function
and also the fact that x+sqrt(x^2+1) is an increasing function
isn't first step replace x with y?
yeah but i changed the form
to find inverse
before i do that
Hi
move over the square root first ig?
so it becomes e^x -sqrt(y^2 +1) = y ?
or keep both y on the same side?
hello?
<@&286206848099549185>
trying to do 2d
.close
Closed by @sick fossil
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have 3 problems like this (this is the first one) I am confused on how to solve it
usually we want to assign variables to things, so here you could say that you purchase C pounds of the cheaper chocolate and E pounds of the more expensive chocolate
and then translate the sentences into equations
4.1c+8.4e=5.4(25.8) ?
ok good that's one equation
is it the correct equation?
yep it looks good'
but you need another one
since we have two variables
we need two equations
do i need to have just one variable in the second equation
nope, you can have both of them
it just has to be, like, different than the first one
how much different can i just switch the order?
essentially different haha
so no, switching the order isn't good enough and multiplying both sides by something won't work either
need to go back to the problem and look for another constraint
you've dealt with the cost
what about the like
actual amount of chocolate

do i use the same variables
yep, you'll want to use C and E here
and would it still be 4.1c and 8.4e?
not necessarily
check this out -- you want to buy 25.8 pounds of chocolate right?
and you know that you're buying C pounds of cheap chocolate and E pounds of expensive chocolate
can you make that into an equation?
25.8/c+e???
what about just C + E = 25.8
ok
does that make sense how i got that?
since the pounds of c and the pounds of e add up to 25.8
yeah
so now we've got two equations
4.1c+8.4e=5.4(25.8)
c + e = 25.8
there's a bunch of ways to solve these but the simplest is substitution
take the second equation (it's way simpler) and solve for C
and then plug that into the first equation and solve for E
e=25.8-c
ok that's fine, you solved for E first but that's alright
now plug that into the first equation and solve for C
4.1c+8.4(25.8-c)=5.4(25.8)
yep
4.1c+216.72-8.4c=139.32
-4.3c+216.72=139.32
-4.3c=-77.4
c=18
and then 25.8-18=7.8
so e=7.8
is my math correct
I also have this problem
I think I can solve it the same way im gonna try to do it
for my math i have one more problem i got to see if it works with the same kind of formulas
i solved that one
now i got this one
can you apply the same formula if you doing same topic?
i did that for the second one but now its mph
whats mph
you can pretend it's meters per hour and they're just going reallllllly slow
how do i do it with miles and time and stuff
anyway this problem works fairly similar to the last one, have one variable for the amount of time he went Fast, and one variable for the amount of time he went Slow
would it be 14f and 7s?
14f and 7s are the distances yeah
ok this one was similar to one i did earlier
there were other mph ones but for some reason i was confusing myself
thank you for helping me
.close
Closed by @cinder saddle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Whas the domain for that one? i'm puttin it in desmos and thats where I got my answer
Ok sorry I can see
So you can't put 0 only because there function is undefined
1/0 form
Your answer is right
I think I know what I missed
you need to consider the intersection of the domain of f(x)
Why intersection
No
aight now im lost
f(x) needs to be defined for g(f(x)) to be defined
so this is right?
yeh
Closed by @lost osprey
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Am I missing a formula that I can use to find X from P?
What’s this?
Yea I only have angle
I don’t have either sides
Except for that 10 m between the poles
So I’m kinda confused

oh yeah i can actually get all the angles
cause its right angled anyways
alright thanks man
wait hold on
i dont have the hypotenuse or the adjacent though?

@crimson sedge
do I??
its in the form of x
mm hmm
aight man
whats thetha tho
interesting
well problem is i cant find any one of the sides
are you solving for them rn? @crimson sedge

but you see there are still 2 unknowns eh
idek what SR is
Oh
aight that makes sense now
ima just make em both x
aight thanks g

@twilit oxide Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @twilit oxide
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So the riemann integral of 0 is 0. The question as result has a contradiction i.e. false statement.
Also integral is indefinite??
Yea
this is an initial value problem
what they meant was I ' (x) = e^sin^2 etc
@lucid stump Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
have you thought of anything?
NEON
NEON
you'll see something cool happen (hopefully)
Um
I haven't done by parts for such complex eqns yet
hmm
give it a shot
try computing the anti derivative of that
(it might need a substitution)
@lucid stump Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @lucid stump
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Trying to find area using integrals and I got a negative result. Can't tell what the mistake is
@cerulean fiber Has your question been resolved?
The exercise says to find the area between the:
y = cos2x
y = 0
x = π/4
x = π/2
<@&286206848099549185>
The answer is supposed to be negative. It looks like your math is right, you just drew the graph wrong
You drew the graph taller but the 2 is on the inside of cos not outside so it actually causes a horizontal shrink
@cerulean fiber Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @cerulean fiber
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
yes
kilo = 1000
centi = 100
volume is cubed
nooo
What
you're asking if 1000m^2=1km^2?
Ye
S
it's not
Oh
What is it
1km=1000m
1km^2=1000m*1000m
oh mb, ray is right
Oh so when its area or volume
I have to times it
yes
So 1km2 is
What
1000000m^2
Wow okay ty
Thats a lot of zeros
yeah it's easier to calculate if you just write
1km=10^3m
(1km)^2=(10^3m)^2
=10^6 m^2
Okay thank you!!
.close
Closed by @sour flint
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
The answer to this question is Solve for X and X is 45 degrees, but I don’t know how my teacher got that answer.
You need to find x or x is already given?
I need to find X
My teacher said X was 45 but I don’t know how she got that
Can you help explain it to me pls
@ripe badge Has your question been resolved?
@ripe badge Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @ripe badge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
A sailor is with his boat at the point A=(1,3,5) and sails in the direction v=(3,1,1)^T. He intends to make a right angled course change to be able to pass through the harbor entrance at the point P=(2,4,7). In what plane pi is the water surface located?
I don’t really know how to solve this
it's basically asking you what plane the boat is sailing in
Yes okay but how do I solve it
you can find three points in the plane and then use that to find the plane
that's probably the most straightforward way of doing it
well you already have two...
Oh okay so can I do (3,1,1) * (x,y,z) - (2,4,7) = 0?
I don't think that works
(3, 1, 1) is not the normal vector to the plane
you have two points in the plane that are given by the problem
how might you find a third, given the remaining piece of information?
Hmm I don’t really know
well, first what's the remaining piece of information you're given?
That it sails in the direction of v = (3,1,1)^T?
yes
so would you agree that if I sail from point A (1,3,5) in that direction for a while, I'll end up at A + (3, 1, 1)?
yes that gives you a third point on the plane
Do I just ignore the T or do I do something with it?
T usually means transpose, so it's probably just some shorthand of writing vectors
can you find the equation of a plane with three points?
Do I just combine the three?
what do you mean by combine?
Take A + P + (4,4,6)?
that wouldn't make a whole lot of sense
that wouldn't even give you a point on the plane
Oh okay
do you know what the general form of the equation of a plane is?
like what do all plane equations look like?
Ax + by + cz = d
how were you taught how to find the equation of a plane? there are a few different approaches here
I don’t really know how to find the equation
hmm I guess I'll go over the linear algebra solution
well, let's first start with lines which might be easier to understand
Do you know what it means when someone says "the equation of the line is y = 2x + 4"?
Yes!
do you agree that it means that if you take any point (x1, y1) on the line and plug it into the equation, you'll see that it checks out?
For example, (1, 6)
Yes I do
so suppose I tell you that the general form of a line's equation is Ax + By = C and that the points (1, 6) and (10, 24) lie on the line.
Oh wait I think I have learned about this is it not that 1 in A is x1 and 2 in P is x2 and so on
Would you agree that
A * 1 + B * 6 = C
A * 10 + B * 24 = C
?
Yes I would
do you know how to solve systems of linear equations?
Yes I think so
okay, suppose I subtract these two equations (the first from the second)
now I have 9A + 18B = 0, right?
Yes!
doing a little more solving, I get A = -2B, right?
Yes
plugging this back into the first of the original equations (I could also choose the second, but whatever), I get -2B + 6B = C, and therefore C = 4B, right?
Yes right
in every case, you will be left over with one "free variable", which you can basically pick freely. In this case, it's B
so if I just pick a value for B, like 1
Then I get A = -2 and C = 4, right?
Yes okay
So plugging this back into the general form of the line's equation (Ax + By = C), you get that the line has an equation of -2x + y = 4
and indeed you can check that (1, 6) and (10, 24) lie on this line
Oh yes okay that makes sense
now suppose I picked a value of B = -3 instead
I would get the equation: 6x - 3y = -12
you can check that this is just a multiple of the previous equation
so basically the "pick freely" part comes from the fact that you can take multiples of an equation for a line and you still have the same line
does that make sense?
Yes it does!
now lines and planes are actually very similar in the mathematics, so much the same thing applies
suppose we have Ax + By + Cz = D
and we know that the points (1, 3, 5), (2, 4, 7), and (4, 4, 6) lie on the plane
Yes exactly!
Can you write out the three equations that must be satisfied?
Yes I can
A* 1 + B *2 + C *4 = d
A * 3 + B * 4 + C * 4 = d
A * 5 + B * 7 + C * 6 =d
you do not get that
you know that the point (1, 3, 5) has to satisfy the equation Ax+By+Cz=D
so what equation in A, B, C, D do you get?
A * 1 + B * 3 + C * 5 = d
So you get the equations
A + 3B + 5C = D
2A + 4B + 7C = D
4A + 4B + 6C = D
correct?
Yes correct
have you learnt about reduced row echelon form or matrices at all?
Not really yet no
have you learnt about solving systems of equations by elimination?
Yes we have
okay
so I'm going to eliminate D from all of the equations and get two equations without D:
Suppose we number the equations for ease of reference:
A + 3B + 5C = D (Equation 1)
2A + 4B + 7C = D (Equation 2)
4A + 4B + 6C = D (Equation 3)
Then eliminating D, we get:
A + B + 2C = 0 [Equation 2 - Equation 1] -- Equation 4
2A - C = 0 [Equation 3 - Equation 2] -- Equation 5
Do you follow so far?
Yes
I can use these two equations and eliminate C now:
5A + B = 0 (add 2 times Equation 5 to Equation 4)
do you agree so far?
Yes I do
So suppose I pick the free variable to be A this time (picking B is more convenient, but I picked B last time, and I want to show that it works with any of them)
we rearrange that last equation to B = -5A
Yes okay!
now I pick a value of 100 for A, again not picking the most convenient value, but it'll suffice
Therefore, what is B?
-500?
Can I put in those values in A + B + 2C = 0 or does it have to be one of the original equations?
you can put it into any of the equations listed, but only equations 4 and 5 will let you solve for C
Okay then I get c = 200
and can you find D?
-400
okay, so you get the equation 100x - 500y + 200z = -400 after plugging these variable values back into Ax + By + Cz = D, right?
Yes right
you can check that all of the mentioned points are indeed in the plane
Yes!
do you know how to find a normal vector of a plane from its equation?
Yes I do
what do you get from that?
N = (100, -500, 200)
do you agree that, no matter the captain's choice, a ship must sail on the surface of the water?
Yes
so in other words, the ship must sail perpendicular to the normal vector, right?
Yes right!
you can check this too
Yes I can!
you can check that (100, -500, 200) is perpendicular to (3, 1, 1)
so the answer is correct
Yes it equals 0!
a worthwhile exercise is seeing if you can solve the problem again but making different choices, like maybe eliminating C first and then A and picking a different free variable
it will all work out the same
Yes okay I will do that!
there is another method where you find the normal vector with the cross product, but it only works with planes
yeah 100x - 500y + 200z = -400 is a valid answer to the question "what is an equation of the plane that the ship sails on?"
Okay thank you so much!
if you make more natural choices, you might get something like x - 5y + 2z = -4
That was very well explained!
Yes I will try to solve it again now
But thank you
np
.close
Closed by @maiden venture
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Not enough context to tell
is there no standard order of precedence?
the text also mentioned linear congruence so idk if that narrows it down
if they are less than 2^n then it's definitely (...) mod 2^n
@glacial moth Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @glacial moth
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do u find the taylor polynomial if its not centered at 0
@gloomy crater Has your question been resolved?
taylor polynomial about $x=\color{yellow}2$ is\
$\sum_{n=0}^\infty\frac{f^{(n)}(\color{yellow}2\color{black})}{n!}(x-\color{yellow}2\color{black})^n$
matt07734
you can think of this as the maclaurin polynomial but translated 2 to the right
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
from that, the coefficient of $(x-\color{yellow}2\color{black})^{\color{cyan}4\color{black}}=\frac{f^{(\color{cyan}4\color{black})}(\color{yellow}2\color{black})}{\color{cyan}4\color{black}!}$
matt07734
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how 2 solve this ?
@burnt seal Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone tell me how to get the answer for this
dont u just find the equation of the normal line then add 1
for the first problem
Only the problems I circled
I got the answers but I dont know how to get them
is the answer y=1/3 x+1 for the first one in red
yup
How did u get it though
do u know how to get the slope of the line perpendicular to y=-3x
no but im assuming its the opposite so y=3x?
opposite and reciprocal
How can I turn 3 into reciprocal?
If the slope of the orignal line is $m$, then the slope of the perpendicular line is $-\frac{1}{m}$
mXd
ye
so the equation of the perpendicular line is y=x/3
and then u have to shift it up 1
so u get y=x/3+1
How could I get the second one since its not at origin anymore
@hollow crown Has your question been resolved?
@hollow crown Has your question been resolved?
One of your options would be to take two points on your original line, apply the transformation to those points, then get the equation of the line that passes through your two new points
@hollow crown Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Could I get help on this? There's a video assigned to it but it isn't really clear..
well like
a composition of functions is given by [
(f\circ g)(x) = \m f{\m gx}
]
jep its easier 4 me too lmao
now we want a function in terms of u
this is like the usual function
ya know
,align
\m fu &= \s u \
\m fu &= \f1u \
\m fu &= 4u^4 + 3u
how did u get those values though 😭
aa okeei lmao
pulling them out of my ass
fair enough
so like
they're diff rules or
we said u = g(x)
okeei
,align
\m f{\m gx} &= \s{\m gx} \
\m f{\m gx} &= \f1{\m gx} \
\m f{\m gx} &= 4{\m gx}^4 + 3\m gx
yeah
so thats your composed function
SO
the idea is
we want to retrieve our f(u) first
you have several choices
for your first question [
\m hx = \f1{(x^2+3)^8}
]
x^2+3?
and then f is ()^8?
LMAOO
for $\ds \f1{(x^2+3)^8}$
almost, but what happened to the fraction?
so your outside function is 1/u^8
aa okeei
and your inside function is x^2 + 3
yes
so like i used u just so i dont confuse you
but like you can make it x
so lets verify this works
right
for $\ds \m fx = \f1{x^8}$ and $\m gx = x^2 +3$ we have: [
(f\circ g)(x) = \m f{\m gx} = \f1{{\m gx}^8} = \f1{(x^2+3)^8}
]
so yes, turns out we are right
also, alternatively, you could have said
for $\ds \m fx = \f1x$ and $\m gx = \p{x^2 +3}^8$ we have: [
(f\circ g)(x) = \m f{\m gx} = \f1{\m gx} = \f1{(x^2+3)^8}
]
both are correct
this goes to show that the functions you choose are not unique
you could choose multiple functions as composition
Anyways, I am done with what i am saying, are you lost? @pine sun
aaa okeei I get it
noice
I'm not lost but just to confirm
LMAO
whats so funny?
aa okeei
I thought so
somewhere s can go into
orr
like think about it
i have no idea on what it could be
idk
can you tell me what an exponential function is
so u is 2(??)
what do you write when i tell you "2 raised to 3"
3^2
2^3
yes
so now if i told you "2 raised to x"
2^x?
2^sqrt?
just x?
yes
so u always has to have an x so s can go into the x?
aaa okeei lmao i get it now

Closed by @pine sun
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I've got no problems in this
But please clarify to me what does the highlighted part mean
it means the explanation on the right
"the vector space of continuous functions on the interval (-inf, inf)"
So you denote continuous functions like this
yes
Alrighty
C for continuous
sometimes we add a little 0 on top
C^0
to say that the 0th derivative is continuous
(0th derivative being the original function)
Thanks for the quick reply, wasn't expecting it so fast
Oh
Wait but the 0th derivative is the function itself right?
Right, it is
Thanks
.close
Closed by @south tulip
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What formulas do you know ?
How to do
I believe you can use KE = 1/2mv²
And PE = mgz
You find the energy with mgz
Then you use it to find V in the other equation
@timber plume
@timber plume Has your question been resolved?
@timber plume Has your question been resolved?
@timber plume Has your question been resolved?
@timber plume Has your question been resolved?
@timber plume Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Ik it’s graded already but I need to study that question for an exam, anyone know what I did wrong?
WITH QUESTION C
you simplified incorrectly
it should be 8
not 27
if i were doing it i would solve the fraction part first, by the rules of exponents, it becomes 2w^3
yep, then 2^3 becomes 8 and w^3 becomes w^9
you can do it your way too, you just have to watch out for simplification stuff
your way would become 6^3/3^3
where do u get the w^3 from?
oh yea
mb didnt see it
alr i see
so if another question is similar to this, i should do ur method as its way easier right?
depends on the question
but 9 times out of 10 probably
2^3 is easier to calculate than 6^3 right
100%
good luck!
ok appreciate it man
🙏 \
@vapid dove 1 more question if u distribute an exponent like the 3 there to an exponent its just 3x2 but if its to a base it would be 4^3 for example?
yup
yea i think thats where i got confused
expoent rasied to expoent just becomes product of two exponents
but coefficients/bases are going to be raised by that power
oohh ok
the two you are talking about are power of a power and the regular exponent
(regular like 2^2 or 4^9)
@fleet lake Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @fleet lake
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i tried powering both sides in the first equation
and changing coses and sec by 1+tan and 1+ cot
but im stuck
<@&286206848099549185>
@autumn lagoon Has your question been resolved?
@autumn lagoon Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello
got 3 hours, needa cram all of those xD
is that doable?
I have some knowledge on them
depends on how much you already know
Thats true
Im just gonna focus on the lhopital rule
is that a difficult concept?
honestly
I just cant get that much done in this much little time
Ill find a way to get a mark somehow
thanks
.close
Closed by @brave marsh
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
not especially
hardest thing is making sure the conditions are met before applying it
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Find the point on $y=e^x$ closest to $(4,-3).$
mXd
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
are you allowed to use calculus on this problem?
(honestly i don't even think you can reliably do this without calculus but i thought i'd ask anyway)
anyway, the easiest way to do this problem is probably by using the distance formula; see if you can figure out how to apply that and ask if you need further assistance
@gloomy crater Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
The first term on a geometric series is 20 and a common ratio of 0.2.
Calculate the sum to infinity of the series.
i have an MCQ with this question, but my answer isn't any of the options
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
what answer do you receive?
S(inf) = a/(1-r)
20/(1-0.2) = 25
that... seems right?
it seems either the question was flawed or you might have misunderstood it, but the problem and solution you've provided are definitely aligned
those aren't any of the options, though, maybe my teacher is wrong?
there's 110, 100, 80, and 120
the question i posted was just a copy and paste of what was sent, so i think there might be a problem with the question
yup, worked it backwards to determine that too, well, thanks anyway, sorry for wasting your time, i'll let my teacher know c:
no worries misunderstandings are what they are 😅
and welcome 🙂
@wispy bronze Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How can I compute nCr(x,y) % x == 0 for any x,y efficiently? x does not have to be prime and x and y do not have to be coprime.
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
!status 2
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
didn't someone link you a stackexchange post about this earlier?
It wasn't relevant
@wet gorge Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I was wondering if anyone could check my proof, I'm concerned that maybe I don't include enough explanation about which properties of a ring/whatever preserve each of my steps, but I also don't want to make it excessively wordy, if that makes sense
it's a good balance imo
i like that you don't consider 0 a zero divisor
makes things a lot simpler
It wasn't my decision but thanks
XD
We consider 0 a subring though
that truffles some feathers
Okay thanks for the feedback
.close
Closed by @royal loom
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
yeah AUSTIN
I FORGOT
Yes, I was wondering if the reasoning in my proof was 👌
just abstract algebra, rings
when will i do all this math 😋
highly doubt i will become a math major, the unis suck, the teachers suck and ofc the pay is like peanuts
but the math doesn't suck! That's the appeal after all of a math major
say a+b is nilpotent here, not just "this"
I think I meant thus
but yeah
you say “so 0 is in N” twice
0 is in N
but I have to prove that that 0
is the additive identity
in N
austin...
I already taken class about class algebra and this is my first time i hear about nilpotent element
the worst part is i believed it too until i looked at it the second time
lol ok
a^(mn)b^(mn)
my bad
😭
since m,n are naturals
nm geq than m (or n)
and so we can say it's
a^(m+j) b^(n+i)
for j, i in 0, ....
so it's 0 * a^j
my man being put down for not adding exponents, gotta love this server
i wouldn't do this to anyone else
i would
ok yeah true so would i
okay i take this back
but they mostly have green or purple names
Does my fix work :o

yeah i mean this is the key
we are friends :c

Okay so ignoring my horrendous exponentiation
it looks fine after the comments in this channel
how's the rest XD
i don't like this sentence idk
just like
you say the same thing five times
just say it once?
i actually just don't understand the last sentence at all
it’s a bit weirdly written but it’s ok i think
right....
so n^k+(-n^k)=0
what makes you think n^k = (-n)^k
and we have additive inverses
or like
n^k=0 => -n^k=0
what why
because you need to show that the additive inverse of n is in N?

i mean no you just have to show that (-n) is in N
like
since n is in N
and you need it to be closed under inverse
since n is in N we know n^k=0
consider (-n)^k
this is either n^k or -n^k
which is either 0 or -0
if you’re worried about that, n^k = 0 implies (-1)^k*n^k = 0
and thus (-n) in N
ok yeah i wasn't sure if that was allowed in an arbitrary ring but it makes sense bc this is a commutative ring
yeah thanks chmonkey
the even odd case thing is unnecessary
this is a simpler way to put it
Closed by @royal loom
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
plz i just need to get started with it thats really what i am lost with
Like do i multiply 5x^2 and 5y^2 on the numerator and denominator
for the x/y-y/x
and the same with the bottom
Ok i try and show
Uh
DOes anything cancel out
Like when im multiply
Ill just send the pci its prob wrong
you should be able to cancel quite a few things
the set up shoud like this?
look*
idk what would cancel here assuming this is right
what i would probably do here
is kind of treat the numerator and denominator independently
and for each of them, come up with a common denominator (so like for the top that would be xy)
and combine them into one fraction
and use this $\frac{\sfrac{\rsq}{\osq}}{\sfrac{\bsq}{\gsq}} = \frac{\rsq}{\osq} \times \frac{\gsq}{\bsq}$
hayley!
yes
Ok perfect thnx
ok i feel like i keep making mistake sry
5 more mins
i will be done
i keep messing up
I show
Lmfao, I got pinged instead of @solid juniper

Closed by @odd sierra
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is this correct?
looks good to me
@dense dawn Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @dense dawn
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Given are that plane pi: x-y+z =-4 and the line L: (x,y,z) = (2,1,3) + t(5,-2,1) a) determine the point of intersection P between L and pi. b) state the orthogonal projection L1 of L onto the plane pi.
You could find two points in L1 and then find the equation of the line
Oh okay great, how do I find the two points?
Choose a point Q in L, and then find the orthogonal projection of Q onto π. That will be in L1
Okay so I can choose (2,1,3) from L?
And do I find the projection of q by using a formula?
Yes, you can use a formula if you know it
We have a formula that says u’ = u•v/ |u|^2 * v
That works when u and v are vectors
Oh okay maybe it’s easier not to use a formula then
You could find a line l such that π and l are perpendicular and Q is in l
Okay I am not entirely sure how to do that
Do you know how to find a perpendicular line to a plane?
I have done it before but I am not sure if I remember
I think I am supposed to use n = (1,-1,1)
Why 2?
Oh sorry I meant 1 my z looked like a 2
So this line l will have as a direction n, because it is perpendicular
Why?
I don’t really know