#help-13
1 messages · Page 230 of 1
that's the only option that allows P → FALSE to be true
(again, you can google "modus tollens" for more, that's the argument form i'm using here)
(there is a lot of philosophical writing on modus tollens — some philosophers DO reject it)
(but in an introductory logic course, they typically don't get into the philosophical weeds and just give you the simplest version lmao)
Isn't math just branched out logic from a set of axioms anyway?
well, thats a different discussion lmao
some philosophers would agree with you, but i think most would disagree nowadays
that perspective is known as "formalism" and it isn't totally dead
but a lot of philosophers and mathematicians think mathematics tries to capture something more "fundamental" to "the structure of reality" than just the consequences of axioms
i.e. our logical rules are made up by humans and kind of arbitrary. like, they seem to WORK, but we never had a divine entity come down to Earth and explain Modus Ponens and Modus Tollens to us
yet despite the rules being kind of... made up, we end up with a system that seems to correspond to real things in the real world
in other words, the logical rules and axioms of mathematics are just the abstractions humans come up with to try to capture what mathematics "really" is
the answer as to what mathematics "really" is is a more controversial one
sine philosophers believe that mathematical "forms" "exists" in some metaphysical sense
like 1, 2, 3 arent just random symbols, they are concepts that are somehow manifest in the makeup of reality
(this is known broadly as "mathematical platonism")
others argue that "mathematics" is just a social construct, and our classification of things into "mathematics" vs "not mathematics" is just an arbitrary one made by society and educational institutions
this doesn't mean it's a lie, just that its boundaries are determined by its societal circumstances
thats related to materialism vs idealism
these standpoints arent necessarily incompatible
correct, yes
you can see that this is a whole rabbit whole you can go down
probably beyond the scope of this server though, i am not an expert on this either
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/formalism-mathematics/ and https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/platonism-mathematics/ are probably good starting points if youre interested in reading more
formalism vs platonism was the dominant "split" of 20th century mathematical thought
(culminating in Russell-Whitehead's Principia Mathematica as an attempt at a comprehensive formalistic system for all of mathematics, and then Goedel's incompleteness theorems showing that this goal was an unachievable one)
nowadays most mathematicians have mellowed out on the issue
Actually I still don't understand Goedel
but it's still actively discussed in philosophy departments
goedel's first incompleteness theorem is basically saying, given a "sufficiently powerful and useful" axiom system for mathematical reasoning, there will be statements that are consistent with those axioms but are not proven by the axioms
"sufficiently powerful and useful" is doing a lot of heavy lifting here
i'm using it as shorthand for "consistent, first-order, recursively enumerable, and capable of expressing natural-number arithmetic with induction"
all of these assumptions are important — if you don't have any of them, then the statement is false
which is kind of why it's so tricky to wrap one's head around
by "consistent with those axioms but are not proven by the axioms", i mean that we could add that statement to the axioms and not "break" anything
we wouldn't introduce any contradictions
but that the axioms themselves can't prove it
I understand its saying that some statements in math are true but are unproveable
(so we could also add the negation of that statement)
i dont really like that wording since i think its kinda misleading
like, if you have an axiomatic system A and some consistent-but-unproveable statement S, we could just add the statement S to the axioms of A
and then the new system (which we write A+S) would be capable of "proving" S
its just that this seems kinda... arbitrary
and the new system would still have examples of consistent-but-unproveable statements
Yeah whenever mathematicians can't prove a statement they just add it as an axiom
i think it's a much easier statement to understand if you've seen any abstract algebra
like group theory
without that background i think it's easy to fall into a lot of "pitfalls" about what it means
So what was Goedels basically saying in summary
do you want the philosophical "point" or the mathematical meaning?
i wrote the mathematical meaning here, but i recognize that it's hard to follow if you're not familiar with the concepts (unfortunately i am not confident enough in myself as an educator to explain it more simply)
philosophically, the context of goedel's incompleteness theorem was that a bunch of formalist mathematicians wanted to "realize Hilbert's program" of setting up a system of rules (first-order axioms) that could express "all of mathematics"
"all of mathematics" is sort of like, intentionally vague here, since people didnt really know how to define that
like, they knew mathematics needed to be able to do arithmetic and algebra and geometry and analysis and stuff
statistics, etc
there was a rough communal understanding of what "all of mathematics" was
but no concrete definition
and they wanted to write down an unambiguous definition using logical rules and axioms
Russell and Whitehead even went as far as to publish an entire multi-volume book on this called Principia Mathematica
but then Goedel's incompleteness theorem rolled around and showed:
- these attempts do not model all of mathematics — there are statements that are mathematically independent of the axioms (i.e. can't be proven or disproven by them)
- it is impossible to have a "useful" axiomatic system that models all of mathematics
point #2 is particularly poignant since it's basically saying "even if you tried to fix Principia Mathematica by adding more axioms to cover more statements, new statements that it can't prove would pop up"
basically, it showed that the original goal of the Hilbert program was impossible
this didn't kill mathematical formalism as a philosophy, but it forced the formalists to reconsider/recontextualize a lot of things
I see
@glass moth Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @glass moth
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i do this, more specifically, what are the bounds?
i have the r bounds, just not sure what i should be using for theta, ive tried 0 to pi/4 and pi/4 to -3pi/4
@frigid stump Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@frigid stump Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello
can someone help me fix this ______
my friend gimme, and i can't fix it
just a little chalange
i should fill all the blank, and get the bottom value, and right value at right side
it might have more than one answer... let me see
it should be more than one answer
is there some criteria for the numbers
if the pic upside not good, i draw better one
no rule, but you should done it with the right value at right and bottom
there are infinitely many solutions
yea
because u can just say -1/2x+4y+6z=0 right
and there’s infinitely many different combinations
yes i only need 1 of it
formatting the blanks as
a b
c d
e f
you can choose any value of a and set the rest equal to these for a solution
can you fill it ?
this question is too silly for me to continue
@naive vigil Has your question been resolved?
@naive vigil say, where did this problem come from...?
If I were the one writing this question, I'd say that an additional paramater is that we want these to be positive integers in some "reasonable" range
so you can fix it if i said it should positive integers?
my college friend gimme a challange
can you show this "challenge" exactly as it was given to you
it said the blank answer can't more than 100 too
!original
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
the .... can't be negatif & the max value is 100
can't put decimal into it,
dang zorn you're so smart
also
@naive vigil what grade are you in?
or at least tell us if you are over or under 13
first year architecture
k
so then, the COMPLETE problem is this:
- you have those 3 multiplication problems
- the left blanks have to add up to 100
- the right blanks also have to add up to 100
- each blank holds an integer between 0 and 100 inclusive
did i get that right?
yeah
right right
and nothing else is given, yes?
yes,
okay
we have two equations:
x + y + z = 100
x/2 + 5y + 7z = 100
for which we want an integer solution with all unknowns between 0 and 100
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
✅
after that?
dunno, can you tell me?
do you know what an even number is?
2, 4 , 6 , 8
like that right?
0
those are the first few positive even numbers yes
but can you tell me the definition
half-right...
then i dont know what's more 😄
you overcomplicated it actually
an even number is a number that is divisible by 2.
that's it
ahhh ok
here you have x/2 as the right blank in the first line
x/2 must be an integer
therefore x is even
we might replace x with 2k for simplicity (ie to get rid of fractions)
2k + y + z = 100
k + 5y + 7z = 100
next i would observe that from the second equation there's not a lot of things that z can be
after that?
the fact you keep asking "after that?" as if you expect me to just hand you the entire solution is kinda offputting ngl
would really prefer if you at least tried to think for yourself here
can you tell me all the numbers that z could be, based on the fact that 7z lies between 0 and 100?
i think 7z is the even number that can make k to be even too?
no,
you don't know that 7z is even too.
in fact this has nothing to do with the previous argument about x...
,calc 46+5 * 1+7 * 7
Result:
100
@naive vigil Has your question been resolved?
yes, thank you to @tropic oxide for much help
Closed by @naive vigil
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I had a question on how to solve question 5 in this textbook because I’m always getting 111ish degrees while the textbook says it’s around 90 degrees more
@oblique pilot Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@oblique pilot Has your question been resolved?
I understand why you got 111, you are one step away but missing a piece.
-
The hypotenuse of the triangle is around 8.54km and you have this correct.
-
To find the angle in the triangle, you can use the fact that tangent of that angle will be equal to the ratio between the opposite and adjacent side of the triangle. From this you find angle to be around 20.56 degrees.
Let me know if this step was unclear, I don't really know how to use mathematical notation on discord, but I could write on a piece of paper.
- Because taxi travels south first, you instantly add 180 degrees (bearing is measured using a "clock method", so to go south you have to turn 180 degrees). Then you add the angle of 20.56 degrees which represents the angle to the west, for a total of 200.56 degrees.
so from south to west it is a addition of 20.56 degrees?
Correct
So in essence the bearing is just looking for this?
Wait this makes so much sense now
The from A in the question is saying it’s the difference from true North on a to the point of c clockwise
That's correct :)
Closed by @oblique pilot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why did he write b > M?
And why is it strict?
What difference would there be in the proof if b > M wasn't stated?
<@&286206848099549185>
@blissful saddle Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@blissful saddle Has your question been resolved?
@blissful saddle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can we find $x$ in $(x^2 + x)e^x = 5$ using the Lambert W function? It seems WA just gives an approximation, without using W.
Closed by @sand cradle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
blue was the correct solution but i got 2/5x
why do you have to add +1 when dividing 2 by 5x ?
With fractions, you can only cancel factors of the top and bottom, not terms.
So, (2 - y)/y isn't 2.
2 - y and y have no common factors, so you can't cancel any common factors.
You can do 2/y - y/y if you want.
so (2-y)/y
huh idk it just ask to get inverse of (2-x)/(5x)
wait chai can you draw it
Chai T. Rex
so i then i multiply 5yx with y?
Chai T. Rex
yep but then i have to group y with 5xy
so i cant just add y's to both sides ? and cancel out 2-y right
you said this earlier i tohught thats what you meant by it
Oh, I misread what you did.
Chai T. Rex
Chai T. Rex
You divide all the terms by y and then move that y outside.
And you can check that it's correct by distributing the y.
Factoring divides the terms by the factor and puts the factor outside.
It's like the opposite of distributing.
Chai T. Rex
ohh ok i see
So, if you continue with that, you'll have the + 1 they want.
ok thank you
.close
Closed by @ornate girder
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can do the Q, but is calculus always in radians?
For angle measure, we do need to use radians. This is because the limits calculated for derivatives must be in radians to work as they do
If you consider a unit circle then the arc length is x radians
,rotate
radians is almost always superior to degrees
No need for any confusion in this case though:
The derivatives and integral formulas for trig functions are only correct in radians. They're different if you're working in degrees
@native lagoon Has your question been resolved?
Interesting enough the answer was 4pi and I got 720, IF the values were angles they’d be equal, was interesting
Thank you both @mortal hemlock @upper abyss for your help!
@native lagoon Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @native lagoon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone answer question 1 for me I’ve already solved it but I feel like I’ve done something wrong I don’t get the concept so idk I tried
@ me when someone answers
first screenshot isnt clear, cant see value of f(x) at point x=-1
instead of taking screenshot from another device, take ss from that device directly
It doesn’t let me
Here
Question 1 and 2
Yeah it’s -1
since $$ f(-1) = -1 = \lim_{x \to -1^{-} } f(x)$$
we say f is left continious at x = -1
Cyrenux
$x \to -1^{-}$ means we are approaching point x from left
Cyrenux
and $x \to -1^{+}$ means we are approaching x from right side
Cyrenux
but it seems like you grasped that already
we say f is continious at x = -1
IF limit exists on point x= -1 and equals to value of f(-1)
Since the function isn’t right continuous at x=-1 then it jumps?
reminder that for a limit to exist at a point, left limit of that point and right limit of that point must be equal to each other
$$ f(-1) = -1 \neq 1 = \lim_{x \to -1^{+}} f(x)$$ so yeah
Cyrenux
its NOT right continious
which interval did you struggle on
for it to be continious on a interval, it must be continious on every point of that interval
oh also it seems like you confused part d with part e while solving @half jungle
Yeah
I mean like
I don’t really understand how to figure out when it’s left or right continuous
hmm, just to make sure, do you know definition of a limit
if u mean how to solve by the definition of a limit yeah
But limit itself
No
Like in an understanding way idk no
definition of limit itself
nope
hmm, do you know what left or right limit is?
no my teacher couldn’t explain the material clearly because we had to rush everything
So I just know the rules
few seconds, almost done
lets take a look at examples of this graph
lets take a look at graph 1 , f(x)
notice how this isnt a piecewise function
and f(a) is defined, and has a value
Yes
now take a look at example 2
here g(a) is not defined, we draw a ball on part of the curve where its and we leave inside of this ball empty
although its not defined at that point of curve, it can still be defined at another point, look at example 2.5, see the red point above the point x = a
so for example 2 we have g(a) not defined
for example 2.5 we have g(a) defined and g(x) = c (for some real positive value c)
(c is positive because on the graph i gave its defined above the x axis)
also notice the orange and light blue coloring shade on the curve g(x) ,as x approaches point a
light blue represents approachment from the left
while orange represents approachment from the right
to point a
here they exist and are equal since they are approaching the same value as you can see
on both example 2 and 2.5
on example 3, right limit DNE ( Does Not Exist)
and on example 4, left limit DNE ( Does Not Exist)
when left limit = right limit at point x=a , we say limit of f(x) exists at point a
$$ \lim_{x \to a^{-}} f(x) = \lim_{x \to a^{+}} f(x) $$
$\implies \lim_{x \to a} f(x)$ exists and
$$ \lim_{x \to a^{-}} f(x) = \lim_{x \to a^{+}} f(x) = \lim_{x \to a} f(x)$$
Cyrenux
existence of left and right limit doesnt straight up mean that limit of that point exists though, a limit exists only if left and right limit are equal:
look at point x=0,
left limit is 2 while
right limit is 1
since they are not equal
\ $\lim_{x \to 0} f(x)=$ Does Not Exist
Cyrenux
@half jungle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
@jolly island Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Prove that at least one number from the set of numbers $\sqrt{2}, \sqrt{3}, \ldots, \sqrt{1000}$ is irrational.
π = ∞
huh √2 is irrational
sqrt(2) is irrational
well known
!xy
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
in fact all are irrational except the perfect squares
sqrt (prime) is irrational
$\sqrt{n}\in \mathbb Q \iff n=k^2,$ for some $k\in\mathbb N$
everg
I think the issue is he has to prove it not know it lol
just prove √2 is irrational
Bros This is the IMO 1959 question
yes
well its not from IMO. so where is it from
wait lemme post rudins proof plz


Solution goes like this:
Assume, for the sake of contradiction, that all numbers $\sqrt{2}, \sqrt{3}, \ldots, \sqrt{1000}$ are rational. Then, consider the square of each of these numbers:
2
,
3
,
…
,
1000.
2,3,…,1000.
Now, consider the prime factorization of each of these numbers. For each number, the prime factorization is unique. Since these numbers range from 2 to 1000, they must include the prime numbers up to 31 (since
3
2
2
1024
32
2
=1024 is greater than 1000).
Now, consider the prime factorization of 2. It is
2
1
2
1
. Similarly, the prime factorization of 3 is
3
1
3
1
, and so on. Since each of the numbers in the list has a prime factorization consisting of prime numbers raised to the power of 1, when we take the square root, the resulting numbers will have prime factorizations with the exponents being multiples of
1
/
2
1/2.
However, the square roots of some of the numbers (like
2
,
3
,
…
,
31
2
,
3
,…,
31
) will have prime factorizations with exponents not equal to an integer. This means that at least one of these square roots is irrational, which contradicts our assumption.
Therefore, our assumption that all numbers are rational is false, and at least one of the numbers
2
,
3
,
…
,
1000
2
,
3
,…,
1000
must be irrational.
This problem illustrates the technique of proof by contradiction and relies on the unique prime factorization property to reach the conclusion. Keep in mind that while the solution may seem straightforward, the key is to recognize the appropriate approach and apply it effectively.
π = ∞
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)

very beautiful


bruh
.close
Closed by @untold moat
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how is it 7
do you know Pythagorean theorem
30 60 90 right triangle
or recognise it is that ^
can i send my working out
sure
@crimson sedge
7^2 is NOT 14
you also have to subtract not add
its okay we all learned first
and btw i have a question
when i was learning to parallel park i hit a parked car
lol
I have a pretty small car so I kinda have just always been able to parallel park
i did the first question correct and the second completely wrong cause i wasn’t concentrating
but the question
i have a 94 camry its the size of a boat. luckily i dont drive this year
im scared that cause im studying 2 days before the test i’ll forget everything i studied..
ok
i’ll update you’
anyways thanks for your help 💓
god bless you
,,afk
.close
Closed by @distant fern
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
👍🏻
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
wait
no it isn't.
hey Ann😉
i’ve heard that you add when the right angle is opposite of the longest side
!redir
This channel is only for on-topic discussion. Please take casual conversation to #discussion or #chill.
[
{\t{hypotenuse}}^2 = {\t{side 1}}^2 + {\t{side 2}}^2
]
you heard some kind of strange shortcut lol
blame mathswatch 🤷♀️
if there is a right angle, then the side across from it is ALWAYS the longest
Qylo
this is the general statement of Pythagorean theorem
.close
Closed by @distant fern
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
marulk
$\log_2$
artemetra
both sides
well
yeah
but don't learn it as a rule
actually try and understand
$\log_2(2^y) = y$
artemetra
look at this
marulk
marulk
there are also a couple of useful log rules
like restrictions ?
no, more like properties
the order is weird on the picture
but rule 6 here is what i talked about
in any case
for your problem you just log_2 both sides
Closed by @ornate girder
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Might just be me, but this question is worded a bit confusing. Any help on understanding what the question is even asking?
“Differentiate r^3 with respect to t, and somewhere you want that to be 12 * [what you get when you differentiate r wrt t]”
Closed by @wraith walrus
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im thinking about it
yes for both quests
okay, suppose some prime q divides a + b
then a = -b mod q
and you can expand $\frac{a^p + b^p}{a + b}$
Jelle
and look at it mod q
(modular arithmetic isn't strictly necessary, but it makes it a bit simpler I think)
this is equal to a^p-1 + a^p-2b .....
yeh
mhmm i'll try again bcs i already got into this point before
thnx
Can u help more pls
@opal basin
You can substitute a = -b mod q
how
a^p-1 - a^p-2b ..... = 0 mod q, if we assume q | gcd, right?
then you can substitute a = -b mod q, becuase q | a + b
ok i got it thnx
i just took number theory, where did you get this expansion?
👍🏻
@uneven hound Has your question been resolved?
@uneven hound Has your question been resolved?
@uneven hound Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @uneven hound
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hey
Closed by @slate lintel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Even helpfuls can
believe the helpers role lets you too
Really? Ill try it 
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
this is just a basic general question to see if anyone has an answer, are there any sort of problem solving books youd recommend, like "how to solve it" by g. polya?
@thick obsidian Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
the answer would be 2,16 no?
a good indication to check if a point is on f^-1 given a point on f(x) is to flip the coordinates of a point on f(x)
ok but i cant really tell if its 2,8 or 2,16
are A and B your only choices?
Actually the question is wrong because you cant really define an entire function with just 2 points
thats what im saying
anything could have happened at f(8) or f(16)
are those your only two choices?
that doesn't help 
yea
I think its a log function?
none of the options can be said to be correct or wrong, the function needs to be more well defined, and you just cant say that it is a log function unless it is mentioned to be a log
yea
welcome to AP bud
but if I had to guess it would be a log function
so 2,16?
yea
log base 4 to be specific will be a good guess and taking the inverse will give 4^x and 4^2 is 16 so yeah (2, 16) is a good guess
wait is this for ap exam


this is the 2 options i have
yea
for y = ab^x, ln(y) = ln(a) + xln(b), so the graph you should be looking for should look like y = ln(a) + xln(b), so find the line which touches the y axis at ln(a) and has slope ln(b)
i made a mistake previously which i corrected so yeah check that, and show me how option d looks like so that i can see if it passes through origin. The function cannot pass through origin
unless a=1 when ln(a) = 0
im sorry chatters but this is all i have sketchy screenshots
take your finest of guesses my brother
for this option c would be the safest option
i thought similar
i am paranoid and i will keep having questions if your willing to stick with me
ill be as funny as possible
i wont really be sticking around so sorry about that
Closed by @floral pumice
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i do b)
as this time theres a number with x^2
so quadratic formula?
@azure dock Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @azure dock
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
This is a problem from a practice real analysis exam that I’m struggling with.
@tough spire Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
Potentially: assume fnk is a uniformly convergent subsequence, use the definition of uniform convergence and see from there
@tough spire Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
8 b i don’t understand
@rapid topaz Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i do this
A newspaper is usually a rectangle. What is the formula for the area of a rectangle?
Once you have that, you can use the second bit of information for write the length in terms of the width, and since the area only involves those two values, you will be able to solve for one.
Make a drawing so it's easier to visualize
could i also use the quadratic formula,
?*
I mean you'll probably end up using it for solving at the end.
It's easy to say you can "use the quadratic formula", but you still have to set it up.
oh
?
this
like do i put it on all the sides?
Use those values (w and w+8) to get an expression for the area.
4 sides
alr
Yes.
273=(w+8)(w)
Distribute the right side and solve using the quadratic formula.
okk
so after doing the quadratic formula, i got 13, and -21, -21 doesnt work so its wrong so 13?
or wait is it
13, 21
Closed by @azure dock
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i am completely lost
Log b b = 1?
well, that holds for every b, so it does not give useful information
do you know how to change the base of a log?
I don’t think so?
you changed the base of a log from b to a ;D
this holds for any a(of course except negatives, 1)
now you may change the base and calculate freely with same bases
Closed by @full harbor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is there an easy way to do this question that I’m not seeing
,rccw
Define “easy” 
You have a regular pentagon - but also maybe think about the fact you have a couple of triangles in it…
Not quite - but
You basically know all the purple’s are 108 - but it’s the orange you want to find, right?
yes
And it’s parallel so are the other angles the same
Or not parallel
The other word
what kind of triangle is LMN
Isosceles
what else
yes there are two sides of equal length
but there are also two other equal things
hypotenuse is a term u use with right angled triangles
can u tell me which two angles are equal in triangle LMN above?
LMM and NLM
LMM?
you even noticed the equal angles before!
well then u have the answer
Closed by @raw egret
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is it x^2+4
No
Use factor theorem for roots of quadratics
Or fundamental theorem of algebra
(8+2i)^2 + 4 isn't 0 so no.
the answer is x^2 - 16x + 68
!nosols
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
!nosols
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
you should not begin with the answer lmao 
this is because if you use the quadratic formula, the part inside the root should evaluate to -4
(because we want it to be +-2i)
and we know that a is 1 (the question specifically wants the factor of x^2 to be 1)
so, the equation simplifies to $\frac{-b}{2} \pm \sqrt{(\frac{b}{2}) ^ 2 - c} = 8 \pm 2i$
kahve
there, we can see that $\frac{-b}{2} = 8$
kahve
so $b = -16$
kahve
honestly still kind of crap that you simply gave out the entire solution without so much as ensuring op is even listening
@stoic orbit Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$$4^{x}* 8^{x + 1} = 16$$
$$2^{2x} * 2^{3(x + 1)} = 2^{4}$$
$$2x + 3x + 3 = 4$$
$$5x = 1$$
x = 1/5
you wrote x+2 in the top line, it should be x+1
other steps look good though
holup
Maladroit
thats it
also, if i am to do this using logs, will the operation be multiplication or addition?
if you log the whole equation?
in the exponential eq, its multiplcition
yea
well, you did log it
$$(x \log 4) * (x + 1 \log 8) = \log 16$$?
Maladroit
you should use log base 2
since the expo eq. was a multiplication, is that how it is in log?
yea
but is this how it is going to look if i am to use logarithim
.
(x+1) is in the brackets
yeah cause $$8^{x + 1}$$
Maladroit
yep
if i unbrack it, its gonna look messy
[\log_2(4^x\cd8^{x+1})=\log_2(16)]
Pure
why did we group 4 and 8?
because they have a common base? (2)
no, because they are on the same side of the equation
Pure
wdym
you did it correctly, but formally you skipped a step
even if they have a different base, it still applied that way?
[\log_2(4^x\cd8^{x+1})<>\log_2(4^x)\cd\log_2(8^{x+1})]
Pure
is
[\log_2(4^x\cd8^{x+1})=\log_2(4^x)+\log_2(8^{x+1})]
Pure
ohhhh
so the rules for exponents are the same in logarithmic..
if product law you add exponents, just like in loga?
what law is the latter equation?
Well log is the inverse of exponents basically
First law
in exponent, you find the procuct?
product
in log you find how much the base needs to be raised to, to get the product ?
.close
Closed by @fiery valley
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, can somebody help me understand this problem?
Let $f: X \to Y$ be a map between two sets. Let $A \subset Y$. Verify that $f(f^{-1}(A)) \supset A$, but the set equality $f(f^{-1}(A)) \supset A$ does not always hold.
Tommy
Isn't $f^{-1}(A)$ by definition the elements in X that are mapped in A? And therefore $f(f^{-1}(A)) = A$
Tommy
WHat am I getting wrong?
lets say f:R->R and f(x)=x^2. what about A=R
also you wrote the wrong subset signs in your statement
should be the other direction
yeah that's what i think as well
prof wrote it the other way i don't know why
but in that case the two sets are equal (?)
are they?
R = R
is for example -5 in the left set?
@hollow storm Has your question been resolved?
for example for f(x) = x^2
we have {-2, -1, 0, 1, 2} --> {0, 1, 4}
in this sense the two sets are not equal?
yes
on the left there are only numbers >= 0
on the right there are all real numbers
which are not the same sets
if A = {0, 1, 4}, f^-1(A) = {-2, -1, 0, 1, 2}
but f{-2, -1, 0, 1, 2} = f(f^-1(A)) = A
???
well I said to pick A=R
what happens if you pick A={-1, 0, 1, 4}
then what is f^-1(A)
well -1 doesn't have an inverse
inverse is not quite the right word
it has no preimage
but that doesnt matter
intuitively, to calculate f^-1(A), you dont check every element in A and see which preimages you have
instead, you check every element x in the domain, calculate f(x) and check whether f(x) is in A
and if you do that, you get that f^-1(A) = {-2, -1, 0, 1, 2}
just like before
why include -1 ?
f(-1) is not in A (?)
f(-1)=1 is in A
ohh yeah now i see
so to prove that the equality of the sets is not always true i just need a counterexample, like f(x) = x^2
okay!! thank you very much
all clear now
.close
Closed by @hollow storm
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
number like 1,2,3,5,7 which can not be factored no more
what about them?
what they call
prime numbers?
prime
*Numbers like
*cannot be factored anymore (or you can factor no more)
*what are they called?
is it true that "perfect square is made up of two squared prime numbers"
💀
thank you
with some extra conditions
In number theory, the sum of two squares theorem relates the prime decomposition of any integer n > 1 to whether it can be written as a sum of two squares, such that n = a2 + b2 for some integers a, b.
An integer greater than one can be written as a sum of two squares if and only if its prime decomposition contains no factor pk, where prime
...
oh sorry I misread you
!original
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
ayy, I'm trying to make some statement
mathematical statement
to solve questions more easily
that's it
the claim(if it is true) will help me solving questions more easily
So it is true?
it is not true that every x^2 = a^2 + b^2 for some prime a, b
its prime decomposition contains no factor pk, where prime p ≡ 3 ( mod 4 ) p\equiv 3{\pmod {4}} and k is odd.
this is the condition, which is kind of awkward to work with
is it true that "x^2=a^2 * b^2"
not necessarily
...oh, we're at multiply
a counter example?
not sum
uh, x=0.1?
0.01 is not the sum of 2 squares of primes
unless you mean x belongs to the natural numbers
let constrict x to the realm of perfect squares
in which case x=4 gives x^2 = 16
your options are 3^2=9, 2^2 = 4 which is either 13 or 18
what's the question again
is it true that "perfect square is made up of the product of two squared prime numbers"
No
a counter example?
...x=4
x^2 = 16 and there are no a, b such that a^2 + b^2 = 16 and a and b are prime
oh product
the result of the product of two squared prime numbers will always ends up a perfect square
that is flawless
yes, that is true
im so proud of myself
$p^2q^2 = (pq)^2$
PrettyPrincessKitty FS
this is true for any p, q integers
is solved now
Closed by @civic coral
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
thats quite inappropriate
how so
nevermind, it is just me having a dirty mind

there doesnt seem to be a question in the image u sent
so a in these equations must equal g/3
that way u get a system of two equations with two unknowns
one unknown being t, the other being k
solve the system and u have the answer
Closed by @outer topaz
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can somebody please tell me how to solve this integral? Ive got it into this form
$$
\frac{1}{8}\int (1-\cos2x)^2(1-\cos2x)dx
$$
but dont know how to continue
konxmok
you mean into
$$
\frac{1}{8}\int (1-3\cos2x+3\cos^22x-\cos^32x)dx
$$
konxmok
yea now convert (cos2x)^2 in terms of cos4x and (cos2x)^3 in terms of cos6x
how do i do those conversions? i really suck at trig
no I misread what you said
i only know the basics of integration
oh ok
and