#help-13
1 messages · Page 218 of 1
really it's the derivative of 2x + 1
if we think of y = f(g(x))
then
f(x) = √x
g(x) = 2x + 1
then by the chain rule:
dy/dx = df/dg • dg/dx = f'(g(x)) • g'(x)
that makes sense to me
why do we multiply this by dx/dt though
I think I'm just confused on how y is a function of t if t isn't present in y(x)
because x is a function of t
so we start by finding dy/dx, which is
dy/dx = 1/2(2x+1)^(1/2) • 2
then we have
y(x(t)), since x is a function of t
so
dy/dt = dy/dx • dx/dt
@deep otter Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @deep otter
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So I don't know if I need to put a specific equation in or not but I need help learning how to solve quadratics for a test tomorrow and this is where I thought of to ask for help first.
.close
Closed by @green meadow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
isn’t the average value of a function tbe same thing as rienmums sums but just in intergal notation?
You mean if rienmums is the same thing as integral?
average of a function as in ( \frac{1}{b-a} \int_a^b f(x) \mathrm d x)
Pure
Oh
ya
@turbid isle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what test would i use to solve this?
Try any
could i use root test?
sure, i dont think l'hopital was necessary though
was there a better way to do it
wihtout that rule
its like my go to rule for limits
In my opinion if it works for you and you find it easy keep at it. (It’s probably better to find more ways though just in case)
yeah i never said it was wrong, youre in the clear
oh alright thx
im doing one more problem but ill like it if u could check it
should i keep this help open?
sure
@hearty mist Has your question been resolved?
To ask for mathematics help on this server, please open your own help channel or help thread. See #❓how-to-get-help for instructions.
would just be 2<x<4
have you checked that?
you know it converges for |x-3|<1 ie 2<x<4
you havent checked to see if it converges at 2 or 4
so am i correct?
what have you done here, youve shown the terms tend to 0, you havent strictly shown the series do, though i can say they do
im showing the terms for alternating test
so im using b sub n to prove that the series converges
oh right, sorry, its been a while
yeah i think youre good to go
@hearty mist Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
In how many ways can a rook from the bottom left corner of an 8 x 8 chessboard reach the top right corner in exactly 4 moves? (The rook must not be on the top right corner prior to the 4th move.)?
The answer key was 532 how did they arrived with the answer
@crimson sedge Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can somebody help me with this please? Prove that the R^2 plane cannot be written as a finite union of lines. Prove that it is not even a finite union of circles.
it's google translated sorry
Circles one is easier than lines as a finite union is bounded
both finite union of lines and circles are bounded?
no, that's the point, only for circles
oh so
the circles themselves are bounded
or the union of circles
sorry if i am dumb
the only thing I can think of for lines is that their union isnt open. but that seems rather overkill, surely it should be easier?
I suppose we can check that for some other line you can have at most n intersections
how do you write this in terms of a function?
why a function
uh i dont know
but if a line has a dimension of R and the plane has a dimension of R^2
can we prove somehow that R --> R^2 is not surjective and so the plane cannot be written as a union of lines
no wait i am tripping
R and R^2 have the same cardinality,, right?
yes
dumb question
if R^2 is infinite and the union of lines is finite
well the lines are still infinite
oh right
Hello how can i Create a frequency distribution, Create cumulative frequency distribution, Calculate mean, median, mode, STD and variance from this data set .
Im so confused (like no clue & i lost my notebook so im even more screwed)
Thanks
@hollow storm Has your question been resolved?
sorry, the translation was faulty. it wasn't circles but circumferences. can we still prove that the plane can't be written as a finite union of circumferences?
@hollow storm Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @hollow storm
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
May I ask for help in this matter
,rccw
Ccw?
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
1
First, name the center as O
hint: consider angle WOS and angle VOT
how are they related (in measures)
yes
Something is VOU I think
and with that, you can find VOU
That's where I got stuck
how?
12x-2-5x+10 right?
nope
How then
12x-2=5x+10+VOU
then
12x-2 -5x -10 = 5x+10+VOU -5x -10
next
Ok
180?
good
What is it?
Oh that's just an indication that it has the same angle with WOS
i am thinking
with the same angle notation
is meaning they are of the same measure
(which may have covered in class, but I don't know if that true)
i.e. TOU=VOU
does this make sense?
I don't get it
I ask my teach she said that the red mark indicates that WOS=VOS+TOU
for isosceles triangle, we have the base angles equal
Yes
i thought it's about the same as this one
same marking means angles of same measure
I think Its different
oh ok
if that's the case
my help ends here, since I don't know how to proceed.
Oh
Hmm
sorry man
It's fine
but I would personally suggest to ask a bit more about the 2 angle notations with the same color
I really think they are somewhat related to something crucial
I can't ask her rn since it's already late sorry mate
it's okay, in case you wanna continue with that question, treat those two red notations as equal in measure.
if not, you can just wait to ask her tomorrow
Let us continue
after this VOU we find, we know that
VOU=TOU
so we have....?
hint: TOU=5x+10
2(5x+10)?
nah
They are both 5x+10?
Oh
hence we can find x
Ohh
and with this, we can find all measures of other angles
Is X=11?
Closed by @golden relic
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what is the total lenght of the wire
60
the total length is 60
the area is 120
and its a rectangle
now what's the area of a rectangle?
Lw
width im guesing
now, what's the perimeter of a rectangle?
gotcha
2l + 2w
no?
no
its in multiplication
Oh ya
so... l = 210 (?) w
210/w
e substitute
Got it
quadratic in w , solve the thing
Thanks
cool
.close
Closed by @spice torrent
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i think im sort of confused, could someone explain the definition of the quotion of a set?
are you sure that's a correct question?, first time hearing something like "quotion of a set"
quotient set?
yeah, basically all the elements of a set that have the same relation right?
Yep pretty much - all the related elements
The quotient of a set under an equivalence relation is basically the set of all the equivalence classes you can get
So e.g. taking the integers and the equivalence relation to be the modulo 2 one (two elements equivalent if their difference is divisible by 2) then you have only equivalence classes [0] and [1], so the integers “quotiented” out by that equivalence relation is {[0], [1]}
(Which I’m sure is somewhat familiar!)
oh i gotcha
Does that at least help a bit? 
of all the equivalence classes you can get --> i think im confused about this
so basically you know like with the previous example I said
You could consider [2], but that equivalence class is the same as [0]
Similarly [3], [5], [7] etc etc is really just [1]
[0] and [1] belong to the same equivalence class, a quotient or whatever is just the set of all elements belonging to the same equivalence class?
[0] and [1] are in the quotient of Z (with respect to the “difference divisible by 2” equivalence relation)
(That’s partly why the notation Z/2Z is used for it)
But of course [0] and [1] are distinct equivalence classes
Basically you have the equivalence classes, which is the set of all elements that are equivalent to some representative
Then go through all possible equivalence classes (there may be finitely many, or infinitely many), and put them in a set
The quotient is that set you get
yeah i think the part that there are multiple equivalence classes in a set confused me
Yeah
it’s like a set of sets there (but of course those equivalence classes in the set don’t need to be the same!)
like it could also include other modulo equivalence classes?
For another example of an equivalence relation, you can define one on the real numbers by saying that a pair of them are equivalent if their difference is an integer, and there are infinitely many equivalence classes you get from that one
It would contain different equivalence classes - but under the same equivalence relation you’re considering
because there are infinitely many differences?
Basically yeah, in fact each real number would be equivalent to one within [0,1) and you have infinitely many numbers in there (I’m sure someone will come around and elaborate on what that becomes, better than I can!)
like the equivalence class of integers pairs that have a difference of 0 and have a difference of 1
Yep basically 
okay thanl you that makes a lot of sense
But if e.g. you changed it to be “difference divisible by 5” the equivalence classes you get will change and as I’m sure you know, Z/5Z and Z/2Z are different
z/5z --> set of elements congruent to mod 5 right
congruence --> a = bmodn => a - b is divisible by mod n
Yep, basically
congruence being one of the typical equivalence relation examples!
also this is the integers modulo 4 right
honestly im ngl im still really bad with congruences, and understanding why a = bmodn is so useful
I’m assuming that’s what they mean 
Awww
they are something and can take time to get used to 
Yep sure! 
can you help me go over this proof
the equivalence relation is juse that there is a bijection between A and B
Are you happy with the part where they basically say that two sets are equivalent iff they have the same number of elements?
yes
Cool cool
and how they found the equivalence class [{1,2}] as well?
no not really
Alright, so from the part above, a subset of X is equivalent to {1,2} if and only if it has two (distinct) elements
So you want to find the subsets of X that have two elements in them
{1,2} is one of them quite clearly
You can get the other by picking two of the three elements from X to make your subset
Does that make it any better? 
As the subsets are equivalent iff they have the same number of elements
ohh
The possibilities are having a subset with no elements, a subset with 1 element, a subset with 2 elements and a subset with 3 elements (all of those will be in the same respective equivalence classes!)
so like {2} is equivalent to 1
{2} is equivalent to the set {1} yep
Both having 1 element
Similarly {3} is equivalent to both!
so thats why you do like [{1}] ~= in P(x)/ ~
so you could have included {2} instead of 1 there right
Yep, you can choose whatever you want (in the equivalence class) to represent it, and remember that equivalence classes are identical or disjoint
So [{1}] = [{2}] = [{3}]
im also sort of confused about the role of the powerset here
also can i brb in 15 mins, i need to walk to class
Basically you’re defining the equivalence relation on the power set, not X itself
Sure, ping me when you’re back 
also the bijection is solely to do with the size of the set
ie like p({1, 2}) --> p({3, 4}) maps to eachother because their powersets are the same size
Yeah, the bijection you make basically is based on the size of the set you’re trying to make a bijection from
If you had a set of two elements, you need to pick two elements to map to as per the previous example
are you using p to represent the power set here?
It is a true statement sure…
@errant wasp Has your question been resolved?
yeah is there a flaw in this?
because once you take the power set, you want to check that every element in the powerset maps to an element in the other powerset?
because wouldnt it be p(a) --> p(b)
@cerulean sail
Well, erm, you want to consider that in the power set, that any two sets you find will have a bijection between them if they have the same number of elements
You’re more wanting to e.g. think that there is at least one bijection between {1,2} and {3,4}
between the set or the elements in the set
Between the elements within the set* sorry
then whast the binjection of the elements of {1,2} and {3,4}
You can e.g. define f(1) = 3 and f(2) = 4, which is clearly invertible (you can also do, say, f(1) = 4 and f(2) = 3)
gotcha
i also forgot invertability is a way to define injections/surjections/bijections
then idk still why is the poweorset important
Because you're defining the subsets of X as equivalent, not the elements of X themselves
thanks, can i also ask about partial orders
Erm I may not be the best to answer about those
you might be better off starting a new channel and asking there, don't want to explain anything poorly for you 
thank you for helping!
Always a pleasure to 
.close
Closed by @errant wasp
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Given point P, (a, b, c) how would I find the distance from the x axis?
is it just distance to (a, 0, 0)?
yes
.close
Closed by @cold briar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
8x - 5 = 2x + 6
You have to solve for x?
Awkward question
You can "move" both of them 🤔 it probably wants you to have the x on the left side, and the numbers on the right side
right
First of all we still don't know the objective so right now I don't see the point in "moving" anything. Second of all we don't "move" terms. We add or substract on both sides.
Are you sure thats the whole exercise?
@small raptor Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
not sure how to do
You can find the length of BC by using cosine law
Then, apply sine rule to find the measure of angle B.
sooo would i use the 11 and 10 or the 34
Find BC using second equation first
Then u should be able to calculate cos of the angle using first equation
soooo it wouldnt be C i assume
wdym?
like the answer cause the number is too small
idk if i did this right but i got a^2=121+100-2ac.cosB
a² = 121 + 100 -2×11×10×cosÂ
You mixed 2nd and 3rd equation i think
ah yes that what i meant
There's no need to use the 3rd equation
If we add 1st and 2nd equation we get:
$\ a^2+c^2=a^2+b^2-2ab \cos B +b^2+c^2-2bc \cos A$
Adam Chebil
.close
Closed by @marsh turret
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, can somebody please help me with this?
Let f : R → R be a function defined by the formula f(x) = ax + b. Prove that if f fixes two points of R then f is the identity on R
So this means that if it fixes two points like f(x1) = x1 and f(x2) = x2 then for all x f(x) = x ?
@hollow storm Has your question been resolved?
Might be worth noting that $\frac{f(p_1) - f(p_2)}{p_1 - p_2} = a$ for any choice of distinct $p_1, p_2$
@cerulean sail
@hollow storm Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @hollow storm
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
thank you
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have these 3 vectors and I'm trying to find the basis
seems to me like a_1, and a_2 are linearly independent
but then a_2 and a_3 are also linearly independent
can I just choose a_2 and a_3
or a_1 and a_2
oh wait they are linearly independent to each other
so
they form the basis
a basis for a subspace means that we have vectors v1, v2, v3 etc.
such that av1 + bv2 + cv3 + ... = (x, y, z, ...) where a, b, c... are not all 0
so they're finding the column space of that matrix
there's a typo: the first vector in the basis should be (3, 6, 0)
the first column of the original matrix
no
only (3, 6, 0) and (2, 1, 3) are the basis vectors
for the subspace
@bright sorrel
right, how did you see this?
taking the first coordinate from each vector?
cause the answer states the first and the third columns are pivot columns
so you go back to the original matrix
and read off the pivot columns from there
can you pls point it out?
in the RREF
I think I'm confused from the language barrier
you look at the RREF to find the pivot columns
can you pls point it out using a software or something? :c
right, those are linearly independent
yes
but aren't second and fourth column also?
😭
Is this chatgpt...
yes
shit
well thats ur first issue
right so
I have the vectors
(3, 1, 2, 4) (6, 2, 1, 1) and (0, 0, 3, 4)
using a matrix I deduce it to
PLEASE STOP USING CHATGPT
oml
okay the pivot columns have a 1 in each column in RREF
(3, 1, 0, 0) (0, 0, 1, 0) (0, 0, 0, 1)
so the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd columns are actually pivot columns
anyways that's not the point
just read off the rows of the RREF to find the basis
as you've noticed they're all linearly independent
so the basis is just the original 3 vectors
(3, 1, 2, 4); (6, 2, 1, 1); (0, 0, 3, 4)
chatGPT sucks at stuff related to maths
Closed by @bright sorrel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can anyone help
What are the common differences for the first sequence in section A
hm
Also the "nth term" column, the answer should not be a number
Do you know the answer to this?
The difference between one number in the sequence and the next
3
I shouldn't have said "common"
2nd right?
Eventually
is it 3
yes
so what's the next difference
5
brb
alr
same wanna continue this in 7 min?
currently doing a tutor class but tutor is delaying answering the ques so came here.
search up quadratic sequences
Yeah since then I have made some progress but wondering if they are correct
Do you want to confirm with me
I will confirm if u send
no
same
For the second sequence on section A , will the 6th term be 38 and 7th 51?
yeah
yeah let me think about it for a sec
alr
do you know what those constants are for
No
ok so your learning about quadratic sequences. A quadratic is anything of the form an^2+bn+c (n is a variable, a,b,c are constants)
If we can find a,b,c, you plug them into that representation and thats is the formula for the nth term
so for the second sequence , what would the constant be for?
Do you know what the 2nd difference would be
nvm I was trippin but thats the next part
Ah ok
yeah
lets now do the 2nd part. Whats u2-u1 (2nd term - 1st term)
we need to solve for a,b, and c before we get the formula
2nd term - 1st term
So would those terms be
the 3,5,7,9 or the actual sequence terms?
actual sequence
so 3+b=3
a = 1
b+3 = 3
3+b is equal to 3
I dont know what to do after the stpe
step
What number does b have to be in order for 3+b=3 to be true
B has to be 0
yeah so a=1, b= 0
In order for 3+b equal to 3
Pass me the equation for c , ill see if i can do it. Also , any quicker ways to find it?
plugging in the values we already know we get 1+0+c=3
I do not think there is any quicker way to find it using a 100% process. If you pay close attention you will probably (not 100% sure) find the solution has the same form as the last entry for each section and could skip a bit but its better to go through the process
if n2 means n squared yeah
here we find c=2
we have a=1, b=0, c=2, so plugging that into an^2+bn+c we get n^2+0b+2 aka n^2+2
I gotta go now but it should be exactly the same process for all the problems. Solve for a using 1st formula in the picture im replying to, solve for b using 2nd, solve for c using 3rd
@static loom Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I begin
$\frac{x^a}{x^b}=x^{a-b}$
Anton Yakunin.
?
Apply it to your question
What do u mean
Ok lets do this differently
30 = 3 * 5 * 2, x^4=x * x * x * x, y^6 = y * y * y * y * y * y
20 = 2 * 2 * 5, x^3 = x * x * x, y^2 = y * y
Ok
How would you simplify $\frac{3\cdot 5 \cdot 2 \cdot x \cdot x \cdot x \cdot x \cdot y \cdot y \cdot y \cdot y \cdot y \cdot y}{2\cdot 2\cdot 5 \cdot x \cdot x \cdot x \cdot y \cdot y}$
Anton Yakunin.

you know how a number divided by itself is 1? use that to simplify this
If it appears on the top, and on the bottom, then you can just delete them
for example we can cancel a 2 from the numerator and denominator to get
$\frac{3\cdot 5 \cdot x \cdot x \cdot x \cdot x \cdot y \cdot y \cdot y \cdot y \cdot y \cdot y}{ 2\cdot 5 \cdot x \cdot x \cdot x \cdot y \cdot y}$
Anton Yakunin.
Keep doing this until you cant anymore
dw I will start much simpler then we'll get back to this
Ok
You know what $\frac{7}{7}$ is
Anton Yakunin.
Yea
What is it
1 whole
Yeah how about $\frac{38}{38}$
Anton Yakunin.
yeah so whenever a number is divided by itself, it is equivalent to 1
Ok
Lets move on. What is $\frac{10}{2}$
Anton Yakunin.
5
Anton Yakunin.
Yes
Anton Yakunin.
Notice we can get 5 as the result by cancelling the 2s
Yes
Anton Yakunin.
X?
10?
Use this
10
Yeah
As long as x is not 0 of course because we cant divide by 0
That doesnt really matter though
Ye
Ok whats $\frac{5 \cdot 5 \cdot 5 \cdot 5}{5 \cdot 5}$
Anton Yakunin.
yeah thats the long way of doing it. Although that works for now, thinking that way will make it harder to do it with variables (also its 5^4 but im pretty sure that was typo)
Remember what I did here
I did not do 5*2=10, then do 10/2 = 5. I just immediately cancelled the 2s and found the answer to be 5. I never multiplied anything
We can do the same thing here
Ok
I will look for a video on this I think it will be more helpful
This math video tutorial explains how to simplify fractions.
Fractions - Basic Introduction: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3TklZi6MeJ4
Simplifying Fractions: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PcEwj5_v75g
Adding Fractions - Unlike Denominators: https://www.you...
Watch this first
Then watch this after
This Pre-Algebra video tutorial explains the process of simplifying algebraic fractions with exponents and variables. It discusses how to simplify algebraic expressions with powers & exponents by factoring.
Algebra For Beginners: ...
do you know how to solve it now ?
good for you, just keep trying
This was my question btw
i would give you the answer but i will wait for your guy that helped above, if he doesn't respond in a while i will help.
Hmm?
?
What is that
Uhh
Along with the videos I sent, you should look up more about variables and unknown constants. The message I am replying to (same thing as the first message I sent), is a formula/rule. If you can understand what variables and unknown constants are, you can apply formulas like these and solve the problem in seconds.
btw (x^2) is the same as (x to the power of 2), just if its confusing
.close
Closed by @verbal spruce
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
1.5x^0.5 = 12x^-2
whats x???
i tried to use log but idk
log is usualyl for when something is raised to the power of x. In this case you can divide one of the variables on both sides and use exponent rules
$\frac{x^a}{x^b}=x^{a-b}$
Anton Yakunin.
is that (1.5)x^(1/2) or (1.5x)^(1/2)?
how would you remove the power for smth like x^2=1? Do same thing here
umm the first part
1/2 in each side
so do i do -1/2.5 in each side?
yh ok
@crimson sedge Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
3x =0 in mod 18
so i know that x is equal to 0,6,12 but i need to solve it for all possible solutions
im using the euclidean algoritm but having difficulties
well I mean that is all solutions
but i havent proved that thats all possible solutions
its asking to prove it and i dont feel like writing every number out
so ik to use the euclidean algorithm
well ok
you are looking for solutions to 3x+18y=0
equivalently, x+6y=0
and from there its easy
you dont need eea
ok uhh 😅 i just started this topic so im not sure but how would this give the all 3 solutions? so we have x+6y=0 and thus also x=12y
but negatives cant exist in mod no? so -6=12 in mod 18
well I started with 3x+18y=0
there I meant integers x,y
this then turns into just x=0,6,12 mod 18, yes
first solve it in the integers
then restrict to mod 18
Closed by @bold pond
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Oops sorry didn't see you typing 😭😭
I don't get what im doing wrong
@fossil thorn Has your question been resolved?
Yeah tough one
I think I got it tho
It's 92/47 K
U forgot the K
@fossil thorn
Closed by @fossil thorn
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Systems of linear equations with 2 variables, i have a few of them that I'd appreciate if someone could explain to me
- |3x-y=13
|2x-3y=-4
- |3x+2y=4x-5
|3x+2y=y+1
- If |x+3y=4
|2x-7=1
Find x-y=?
^
@crimson sedge Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
Yes
You can rearrange 3x - y = 13
By isolating for example -y
so by subtracting 3x on both sides
so you have -y = 13 - 3x
And times it by -1 to remove the minus
so it will be
y = -(13 - 3x)
Now try and insert this known y, into -2x + 3y = -4
Ok wait
I have a simpler method
I just realized
3x - y = 13
-2x + 3y = -4
Let's multiply the first equation by 3 so that the coefficients of y in both equations are opposites:
That'll be
9x - 3y = 39
-2x + 3y = -4
And now
We add the two equations to get rid of y
(9x−3y) + (−2x + 3y) = 39 + (−4)
Removing paranthesis:
9x − 3y − 2x + 3y = 39 − 4
That is simplified to
7x = 35
Simply divide both sides by 7
to find x
x = 5
And now insert the value of x into one of the original equations
and isolate y
I dont have time you can now, I think you got it now
I know you're smart enough
basically just
3x − y = 13
3(5) − y = 13
15 − y = 13
-y = -2
times both sides by -1
to get rid of minus
y = 2
All in all:
x = 5
y = 2
You can confirm these by inserting both values in original equations to see if they add up
no problem 😊
@crimson sedge Has your question been resolved?
@crimson sedge Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
On a recent test for Geometry 1, there was the question "What goes up must come down. The ball went up. It will come down. Decide weather inductive reasoning or deductive reasoning is used to reach the conclusion." I answered deductive reasoning because it does not use specific observations and pattern recognition, it uses existing theory (newtons 2nd law) to formulate a hypothesis. I was marked incorrect on this question, but I would like to argue for my grade because I believe it is deductive reasoning. Am I correct?
what a weird question
Yeah
This teacher adds a lot of non objective questions, it's super annoying
Oh yeah also this 1 question would push me from a B to an A
<@&286206848099549185>
hi
Hello, the question is the long message above, 15 minutes thingy
Can you help me sir
alr
lets see
im from canada, so the currciculum might be a bit different
my math teacher is absolutely dogwater
he doesnt teach anything
he jsut writes questions and expects us to do it
lol
Its alr, mine is also terrible
im in math 9 enriched
so we learn like 1 unit in like3 days
rn we're doing imaginary number and polynomials combines
anyway what u need help with
This
first of all, its "whether", not "weather"
I'ma math kid not an English kid mb
ok
Given the exact wording of the prompt, the question may be searching for a contrast between inductive and deductive thinking.
and i see ur using newton law
if u r not sure, u can always ask ur teach
also, why do i feel like this is physics
It's a geometry bruh moment
mmm
If the question emphasized the idea of observing a specific instance (the ball going up) and making a generalization (it will come down), they might be looking for an inductive reasoning response.
My teacher puts random shit that isn't related to standards on the tests
my teacher asked us the janitor's name at the very end of a test...
That was the entirety of the question
and that was worth 30%
Yeah
But in general I feel like I don't agree with the teachers awnser on this
Because it isn't pattern recognition
i dont agree with the treachers answer on this because it is not math
And it's presented not in the context of a scenario
and ur teacher is dogwater
By that I mean that they don't say "a ball goes up and comes back down"
They say what goes up must come down
Which makes it sound like it's a law
m
And not a specific observation
Yeah I'm gonna double check the standards on that for my area
Oh is that precalc?
That doesn't look complicated
thats our curriculum
Fr
Wish me luck, my teacher is very stubborn
She barely ever admits she's wrong
Even though she's wrong a lot
She just blames us
this our new cyu
simple
as i said
the whiteboard
i feel like american curriculum is so different
like, its not even related
its clearly physics
she needs jesus
ye
@tough dock Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @tough dock
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
To approximate the length of a lake, a surveyor starts at one end of the lake and walks 245 yards. He then turns 110 and walks 270 yards until he arrives at the other end of the lake. Approximately how long is the lake?
do u know law of cosines
@jolly swan Has your question been resolved?
Yes
Thats why I labeled them
b^2 = a^2 + c^2 - 2(a)(b)cosc
Or something along the lines of that
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@faint yoke Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hey guys
is this true or false?
i try to prove X is finite iff dim is finite
and the direct part is easy since there now could be only a finitely many functions
but how to prove the converse part ?
.close
Closed by @shrewd forge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, for question (a), I used the definition of Taylor Series
$f(x) = \sum_{n = 0}^\infty \frac{f^{(n)}(0)x^n}{n!}$
XO
For (b), am I expected to use this same formula?
And do the ratio test
Setting $a_n = \frac{f^{(n)}(0)x^n}{n!}$
XO
Yeah
Using nth derivative, all that?
Yeah ig
I thinku can find a formula here for the nth derivative
Can you actually?
Well
f(0) = 1
f'(0) = 1
f''(0) = 2
f'''(0) = 6
So I would say that nth derivative at zero is given by n(n - 1)
Check for the 4th too
Wdym
Oh
Are my derivatives correct
Till second it's correct
