Channel closed
Closed by @proven condor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
1 messages · Page 201 of 1
Closed by @proven condor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I am not really working on something, I just don't understand this equation.
the square root of (the coefficient ratio of specific heats × the pressure of the gas / the density of the medium).
I don't know what that means
I know it's for calculating the speed of sound
But I don't understand coefficients or square roots
From what I found, the coefficient ratio of specific heats is Specific Heat Capacity
Which i also don't understand
This is apparently the formula for heat capacity ratio
I am all over confused
Is this the right place to ask this question? Because it is some complex mathematics, so I came here first.
Where's the expression that uses square root
Let me find that
I can’t find a visible expression of it
You know what, I think I’m just trying to understand something when I don’t even understand what I need to understand it. I’ll be closing this channel and doing something else about my problem.
.close
Closed by @rare nova
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Would you say this is the right solution x,y,z = 0
For the equation on the picture in the gradient
is the way I solved it correct or am I just doing magic is what I’m asking I know the answer is 0,0,0
@merry nacelle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed by @upper quartz
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i am having problems with this question because i dont think we have ever done anything with anything multiplied by theta and the notes had nothing to do with this
sorry for cutting you off kami
double angle identities
I have tried turning cos(2theta - 30degrees) into cos2thetacos30 + sin2thetasin30 but that didnt work
we arent onto those yet
hold on lemme look just incase i forgot to put those in my little formula sheet thing
havent seen those yet
maybe i could
but i just end up turning it into like a slightly more complicated version of what i have now? or am i entirely missing something
i mean the standard way to solve for this is to use the sum and difference identities then double angle
well the problem is we havent learned double angle identities yet
although i can try them
i am not sure
i can also just straight up tank the 2 missed questions out of 20 but thats not math of me
like literally theres this compared to the next question being literally tan(pi/theta)
wait i dont think the double angles help much
so the only thing i left i could think of is just using the complementary angles
Closed by @twilit cliff
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Forgot to take the integral of kx
Expanding (x + 2)² is a strange choice, and it only makes more work
But yes, the idea is correct. You want to find the k that makes this integral 1
wait wdym iI added it
Whoops no you're right
4th line is unnecessary tbh
so just solve now?
And grab k!
Factor out k
what software is that
@pine crescent Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @digital cliff
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Try asking in #book-recommendations
Closed by @wicked swan
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Question If we use a p value cut off of 10% do we reject? Fail to reject? Or are we unable to tell using our confidence interval?
Help?
@fervent charm Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
2 col proofs
I need someone to teach me this badly
I know everything on my geo test expect 2 colum proofs
(geometry)
What mainly confuses me with this certain problem is
I dont know what comes after in the 1st row so
Therefore, I cant solve the 2nd colum which results to me failing this problem
@somber zenith Has your question been resolved?
No
@somber zenith Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
remember [
a^m\cdot a^n = a^{m+n}
]
Closed by @old fjord
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
general question, need help with studying
have midterms tomorrow, doing computer engineering
i have to study these, by tomorrow
how would i go about it?
thats kinda hard to answer without knowing how comfortable you are with the material
.close
Closed by @obtuse sierra
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
find the critical points of
f(x) = x^4 - 6x^2 + 8x
I have found the first derivative
and used the first derivative test
4x^3 - 12x + 8 = 0
x^3 - 3x + 2 = 0
x^3 - 3x = -2
x(x^2 - 3) = -2
but then
i get to x^2 - 3 = 02
-2
and its
x^2 = 1
but then the x's in the answer are only 1 and -2
Try some values.
?
Substitute small numbers to see if the equation works.
why dont you use x ≈−1.39?
idk
yo
how come i have to subsitute them afterwards though
Not after, you just try out a value to see if it works.
It wouldn't be that easy to solve this equation.
Closed by @snow leaf
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
After finding a value that works, use long division.
✅
how do i do this one
i used
first derivative test
and then reached
2x = 0
and then i got (0,0) as the relative minimum
i dont understand how they got
(2,4) as the relative max
do you just plug in the values from [-1,2]
into the original function
If the function didn't got restricted by interval, then the function would be as large as it could be towards -inf and inf. And those wouldn't be defined.
But when a function is restricted by interval, then the end values are included.
but then
i donget ti
dont get it
since
when i was finding the critical points i only got 0
You do indeed is correct, and this does apply to this question too. But this question also want's the relative and absolute max, and thus you need to see if the function is restricted by interval, and it does.
what do i do if it is restricted
You just see if the end points are usable.
That works, and so does drawing a graph to visualize.
A relative max is when the function turns from increasing to decreasing. And the end point is a absolute max, that's the same as a relative max in regular function, and this then is the same points.
I feel the explanation this time is pretty confusing
waittt
if a relative max is when a function goes from incerasing to decreasing
in this one
doesnt the function
not decrease
after (2,4)
This precalculus video tutorial provides a basic introduction into the relative maximum and minimum values of a function. It explains how to identify where the relative maxima and relative minima are located as well as determining the relative maximum and minimum values.
Access Full-Length Premium Videos: https://www.patreon.com/...
I'm not sure if this helps. If other has a better explanation, sure do explain.
bro i am so confused
now i went tothe next questions
and theres 2 absolute maximums
but then i searched
and it said there can only be 1 absolute maximum
nvm
all my classmates said my teacher made mistakes
thx
.close
Closed by @snow leaf
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What does it mean for the system to be 'consistent' here?
we say a system of linear equations is consistent if it has at least one solution.
Ok and how would I figure out if it is consistent or not in the state is presented? Obviously if it has something like 0 = 8 we know it is impossible (inconsistent?), but here or in other similar situations is it that obvious that it is possible?
well here they'vee straight up solved it.
You are right, idk wtf I was thinking my brain just disconnected I guess
Thank you
.close
Closed by @worn geode
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i plugged into things and it told me x was 0 but i dont know all the steps
id start by taking LCM or LCD to subtract the fractions together
i multiplied both fractions by the others denominator
ill senda picture of my working
,rccw
shift denominator to right side
to get rid of sqrt , take square on both side and solve
but it might be tough cuz so many terms
yea thats the step idk how to do
actually nvm theres only 2 terms and use the (a-b)^2 formula
is that difference of 2 squares
(a-b)(a-b)
also how did you spot that thers so many terms
wait i think i can factorise some of it
exam marke rbe like yeah im not reading all that shit
xd, they would probably read the answer only
also i think u get atleast 4 solutions for this question
apparently the answer is 0 so i guess 3 of those just don work because of fraction undefined
maybe
i checked the answer on symbolab and it goes up to the super long thing with the denom shited to the right and then it just says its "its 0 bro idk what to tell you"
ig i just pray this isnt in my exam tomorrow lol thats gonna eat up so much time
thanks for ya help
.close
Closed by @fallen hemlock
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have question about complex numbers.
!da2a
No need to ask “Can I ask…?” or “Does anyone know about…?”—it’s faster for everyone if you just ask your question! See https://dontasktoask.com/
you should ask your question directly @woeful dagger
So i have exercise
Re( Zcon * Z1 ) = 1 and
Im (Z/Z1) = - 3 /5
and i have a problem later on
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
okay 1 sec
my handrwirtnig sucks tho
so here it is
this is what i get for first one
And now im stuck in the second one when i wnat to exchange x or y
The i confuses me here alot
Like if i want tto do Y=1-2x
i have 2yi
do i do 2(1-2y)*i then its 2(i-2xi) -xi / 3
2i-4xi-xi/3
2i-5xi/3 and then i dont know what to do
ok fuck some of these are rotated
also the separation between problem statement and work is just gone
what do you mean
i don't know where the problem data ends and your work begins
So basically
Here i got the Re part needed
here i got the Im part
and now i need to find x and y bu ti dont know how
i got this, but i dont know how to do it after that
I dont know how to deal with i's here
<@&286206848099549185>
ping me if answer
fuck sorry i am busy in class
no worries all good
@woeful dagger Has your question been resolved?
@woeful dagger Has your question been resolved?
@woeful dagger Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@woeful dagger Has your question been resolved?
@woeful dagger Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @woeful dagger
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is this accurate?
Won't the sum end up being negative which makes no sense?
That works for -1 < a < 1
Okay
We call it a geometric series
That wasn't mentioned. Good to know
Thanks @upper abyss
Np. Feel free to ask if you have anything else
is there a way to find the nth factorial without having to calculate the n-1th factorial @upper abyss
what even is the "grown"
As mentioned, Stirling's Approximation is bae, and can be an easy way to get approximations of larger factorials
But no, multiplying them out is the only way to calculate factorials exactly
Do you have a series with a factorial in it?
No
that sounds miserable though
like series from i=0 to n i!
How do we get this?
I know this
But idk how they adapted it for n^2
is it as simple as changing n to n^whateverPower ?
@upper abyss
That formula works for any n, including n², cos(n), etc.
@glacial moth Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @glacial moth
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm having trouble understanding this proof, specifically at the step where they 'use the 1D mean value THM in both coordinates....'
I’m not seeing where the MVT is applied here. Could anyone help explain?
@royal loom Has your question been resolved?
Damn he didn’t write it out
It’s basically defining g(x) = f(x, a_2) then using the MVT on g to get some bounds on it
I think you can even do equality instead on that third line
@royal loom
I see what you said. I’ll have to think about it
If you e.g. defined $g(x) = f(x, a_2 + h_2)$ and applied MVT on $[a_1, a_1 + h_1]$ then there’s some $c_1$ between those points st $\frac{ g(a_1 + h_1) - g(a_1)}{h_1} = g(c_1)$
(had this mostly written out lol)
@cerulean sail
@royal loom Has your question been resolved?
do you mean g'(c1)
I think so
but either way, I still don't see how that gives us the next step
@hollow osprey Could you maybe elaborate some more ? I don't understand still
Yeah mb, and rather the c1 should be replaced with a1 + c1 too 
$g(x) = f(x, a_2 + h_2)$ and applied MVT on $[a_1, a_1 + h_1]$ then there’s some $c_1$ between those points st $\frac{ g(a_1 + h_1) - g(a_1)}{h_1} = g'(a_1+c_1)$
Austin
like so?
yea but basically the c1 is positive and less than h1, so that you get a1 + c1 between those points (rather than c1 itself, me
)
Of course then as $h_1$ goes to zero, your $c_1$ goes to zero, as you had $0 < c_1 < h_1$
@cerulean sail
@royal loom 
oh sorry I'm back
sorry working on multiple things here
Okay so I understand that
$$f(a+h)-f(a)=$$
$$=f(a_1+h_1,a_2+h_2)-f(a_1,a_2+h_2)+f(a_1,a_2+h_2)-f(a_1,a_2)$$
Austin
then we want to apply the MVT to this
so like just going one step at a time
let's do the one that looks likely easier
applying it to
Sure
understood
but then what?
this still doesn't look anything like what the proof just skips to next
atleast not to me
If it's for this one here, the $f(a_1, a_2 + h_2) - f(a_1, a_2)$ it's kinda similar in that notice how the $a_1$ is fixed between both terms, and yada yada apply MVT on $[a_2, a_2 + h_2]$ on similarly defined $g(x) = f(a_1, x)$
@cerulean sail
Gonna relabel your $c$ as $c^$ for a moment, multiply out by the $h_1$ and you get the equality $g(a_1 + h_1) - g(a_1) = h_1 g'(c^)$
@cerulean sail
but I'm starting to feel like this is above my head
I'm not sure I'll understand
so I don't want to waste your time
because I'm a bit lost already
I can ask my professor on Monday about this I think might be best to do in person
if that's fine
Sure if that would work better
it's really not too bad overall but whatever works best for you 
I'd be willing to try one more time if you want?
I'm just getting frustrated with this proof
and I don't want to take up your time if I'm not going to get it
sure sure
Okay
So
we want to show in 2 dimensions that if all the partials of f exist and are continuous in a neighboorhood of a, then f is differentiable at a
and then we go to apply the MVT to the two separate pieces
Which piece do you want to do first?
We can do whichever, they're basically the same idea for both 
Austin
we could simplify by subbing b=a2+h2 and ~~d=a1 ~~if that might help. Or what now?
Yep, for ease we can write $b = a_2 + h_2$ (noting that it's just a constant) so then we have
[
f(a_1 + h_1, b) - f(a_1, b)
]
@cerulean sail
Of course spying that the b is the same between them, but the first coordinate changes
Right
if we make g(x)=f(x,b)
then g(a1+h)=f(a1+h1,b)
so we can do that
make g(x)=f(x,b)
then we have
g(a1+h1)-g(a1)
by the MVT there exists a C in (a1, a1+h1) such that g'(C)*(h1)=g(a1+h1)-g(a1)=f(a1+h1,b)-f(a1,b)
so we can make that replacement. But g'(C) what does this represent?
f'(C,b)
so we can replace in the sum
with
f'(C, a_2+h_2) * h1
for that term
and then similarly for the other make a
f'(a1, D) * h2
replacement?
just guessing, I can repeat the process if it worked for the other one
last bit is - instead of + 
yep it's pretty much the same thing, also a tiny point too
We have our $C\in (a_1, a_1 + h_1)$, but basically in theirs they chose to note that because it's in that interval you could instead write $C = a_1 + c_1$ for some $c_1\in(0, h_1)$
@cerulean sail
sure
Either way, for the most part, that difference doesn't matter much tbh
I think let's keep the big C
they skipped so many steps and subsitutions omg
no wonder I could not follow that
Okay so then
f(a+h)-f(a)=................ big thing
and big thing
we've shown
is
$$f(a+h)-f(a)=f'(C,a_2+h_2)\cdot h1 + f'(a1, D)\cdot h2$$
Austin
this is true right?
Okay
so we are missing
the gradient term
and divided by the quotient of h
What happens next?
From that point, they basically put that into the thing here
$$\frac{f'(C,a_2+h_2)\cdot h_1+f'(a_1, D)\cdot h_2 -\langle c, h \rangle}{||h||}$$
Austin
But then the $\ip{\vec{c}}{\vec{h}} = \partial_{1}f(a_1, a_2) h_1 +\partial_{2}f(a_1, a_2) h_2$
@cerulean sail
Oh also remember that as f is a function of two variables here
$$\frac{f'(C,a_2+h_2)\cdot h_1 +f'(a_1, D)\cdot h_2 -\partial_1f(a_1, a_2)\cdot h_1+\partial_2 f(a_1,a_2)\cdot h_2}{||h||}$$
Austin
First term is $\partial_1 f(C, a_2 + h_2)$
@cerulean sail
$$\frac{\partial_1f(C,a_2+h_2)\cdot h_1 +\partial_2f(a_1, D)\cdot h_2 -\partial_1f(a_1, a_2)\cdot h_1+\partial_2 f(a_1,a_2)\cdot h_2}{|h|}$$
Yep (norm of h for the denom)
Austin
like terms 
$$\frac{h_1(\partial_1f(C,a_2+h_2)-\partial_1f(a_1,a_2))+h_2(\partial_{2}f(a_1,D)+\partial_2f(a_1,a_2)}{||h||}$$
Austin
yep, then what they did was just split the fractions into separate bits
sure
What they then did was say that because you know the partial derivatives all exist and are continuous, in particular the $\partial_1 f$ and $\partial_2 f$ are continuous
@cerulean sail
something to do with a limit here
yea
not seeing what the limit is though
lim of partial -> a point should equal partial at the point so we can make the top become 0
I think
Yep the top can become 0 as a result of that
They then send $\norm{h} \to 0$
@cerulean sail
oh as norm h-> h1/h2 -> 0
Which implies that you have to have $h_1 \to 0$ and $h_2 \to 0$ both
@cerulean sail
indeed
Yep 
but
we have C and D still
as norm h to 0 we have partial1 (C,a2)- partial1 (a1,a2) and something similar for the other one
how do we know C -> a1?
because
C was in (a1, h1+a1)
as norm h -> 0 h1 -> 0 C-> a1
and likewise
OKAY
U r the best chartbit
now level with me here
the proof presented in my lecture notes
complete ass?
Think they have a "you must struggle by yourself" philosophy (which can't lie I find annoying a lot of the times) 
struggle I did
but thanks to u I got it figured out
gonna write this all out formally now hopefully
ty very mcuh
my pleasure, happy it's all good! 
.close
Closed by @royal loom
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm having trouble with P1:a. I simply don't get how to solve it, do I solve it like a quadratic and apply log rules? Please help.
See e^2x as (e^x)^2
@dawn quest Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @dawn quest
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what is the smallest triangle the tangent of 9-x^2 can draw with the coordinate axes
Smallest area?
yes
and i was thinking can i create a function from this that has an input x then creates the tangent line at that given point on the function an outputs its zero point
.close
Closed by @lapis laurel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Since the 3rd row and 3rd column have all zeros, does that mean my variable x3 would be a free variable?
x3 is a free variable yes
explain
Both x3 and x4 are free variables actually
^
yeah true
is this an augmented or coefficient matrix
but im confused regarding the column filled with zeros
augmented
Ohhh, then ignore what I said
The column to the right represents what the linear equations are equal to. You’re dealing with a homogenous system
^
do you see how you identify free variables
x1 x2 both have leading entries
Exactly. A variable is a free variable if it doesn’t have what we call a “pivot” when put in rref
Which is just a leading 1
Nah, linear algebra can be a bit hard intuitively at first. Don’t beat yourself up :)
hold up
i get
x1=-3x3
x2=-5x3
x3=x3
its telling me that the co-efficients for v1 v2 & v3 are exactly the opposite
If you want to solve for whether v1, v2, and v3 are linearly independent, and if not, give a nontrivial solution to it, then I suggest putting the vectors in a matrix where the entries are put in separate columns
By that I mean a matrix with the following entries:
((-18, -7, 12),
(8, 10, -13),
(-14, 29, -29))
If the matrix row reduces to the identity matrix, then the vectors must be linearly independent. Otherwise, keep track of the elementary row operations you use to get a row of all zeros. The linear combination that leads to that all zero row is your answer
i actually had the right solution the entire time 😭
but thanks
I got a question though
Fs :) what’s up?
for a matrix to span all of all R^n, does its RREF form have to be an identity matrix?
Well not necessarily. A matrix can span R^n but have m rows such that m>n
And that certainly can’t row reduce to the identity matrix
Correct. If you have a set of vectors who’s cardinality is equal to the dimension of the vector space, then those vectors can only span the vector space if the matrix form of those vectors row reduces to the identity matrix
That way the matrix has to be n by n (given that the vector space is n-dimensional)
A better justification for why W2 isn’t a basis is that it has a 0 vector in it. Any set of vectors with a 0 vector must be linearly dependent, because a non-trivial solution is just multiplying the 0 vector by any non-zero scalar
@random kelp Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Could someone check my answers for some simple year 9 math, thanks.
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
.close
Closed by @royal loom
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Does this constitutes to a quadratic equation?
my intution would also say no, because there's still ln(a) in the second term
but I'm not sure how to solve it
which technique
It seems like rather uneasy thing to do
lemme check if its even possible
Wolfram didnt find any closed form solution
what do u mean closed form solution
closed form means basically that it can be writen using all the symbols you know
If it doesnt have closed form, then you can just aproximate the solution
So that means it's irrational? and the only way is to appoximate it
Yeah, its definitely irrational
but furthermore, it cannot be also written using logarithms, roots and all these things
its around 3.369
Seems like it could be a mistake in the calculation then
this equation actually stems from this question
where u would rotate the area between f(x) and a around the x-axis
rotate the area between f(x) and a around the x-axis or around the a-axis?
x-axis
I just figured I would subtract f(x) with a. so I would get g(x) = e^x - a
a-e^x might be better option
e^x - a would be negative
but it actually doesnt matter as much, since you will square it in the process
oh okay
So what would you do then?
so I would use the formula of integration around the x-as and have V= pi * integral (a-e^x)^2 dx
I tried subtitute, but that didnt really work, so I just workout the brackets and split them in multiple integrals
yeah, thats probably easier
Just one more thing, what are the bounds of that integral?
yeah the bound go from 0 until the point where e^x and a cross and that point is ln(a)?
right so
EmilyIsAlwaysRight
how did you solve that integral?
or what solution did you get
hmm it actually seems like you got it right, does your textbook provide solution?
Or can you send photo of the original question? To make sure you didnt misinterpret something
this was on an exam, so unfortunately I only have what I remember
How would one solve this if it doesnt have closed form?
If it doesnt have a closed form, then you cant solve it. You can only aproximate the solution
what techniques would you use? taylor series?
for the aproximation?
probably newtons method, i dont know much aproximation techniques
taylor series would give you polynomial of a large degree which would be probably unsolvable as well
Yeah probably
appreciate the help
yw, if you dont have any further questions you can .close this
Closed by @potent vector
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, everyone. I'm currently learning fuzzy logic (fuzzy sets, specifically), and I'm encountering this question:
I feel like my proof down there is not really much of a proof. I do know that (a) is true, but I don't know what to write. I would really appreciate some help, or at least a clue on what I should write in the proof
@mighty hawk Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@mighty hawk Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185> anyone?
<@&286206848099549185>
Maybe write them using set builder notation, then use a union symbol instead of the +
I don’t know what it means to multiply two intervals
But whatever it means, you can probably solve it in a similar fashion
Multiplying the two intervals lead to this:
I'll try doing that, thanks
all you need to show is that if x\in A.B then x \in E.F
A.B:={a.b|a\in A, b\in B}
then x\in A.B, means x=a_1b_1 for some a_1\inA, b_1\in B
and a_1\in E, b_1\in F
thus a_1b_1\in E.F
hence x \in E.F
similarly do the rest
@mighty hawk Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi everyone. I'm working with limits at Infinity. I'm stuck with the 5^x. I don't know if I need to apply Euler or distribute the limit to lim (5^x) - lim (1/x)
Distribute the limit, both these limits exist so you are allowed to do it
wdym "apply euler"
probably write as e^ln(..)
is it tho
x goes to -infinity, notice the negative sign
x goes to minus infinity
Ohh ok. It leaves to 0 - 0= 0 right?
Yes
Closed by @crisp rover
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
∂f/∂x * ∂g/∂z * ∂j/∂s + ∂f/∂y * ∂h/∂z * ∂j/∂s + ∂f/∂y * ∂h/∂s + ∂f/∂z * ∂j/∂s + ∂f/∂s
is this correct?
@long walrus Has your question been resolved?
I get to start with:
w(s, t) = f(g(j(s), t), h(j(s), s, t), j(s), s)
this is what I got from that
I start with z = j(s) and then put that into y(s, t) = h( j(s) , s , t) and x(s, t) = g( j(s), t). Hence for f(x, y, z, s) we obtain
w(s, t) = f(x, y, z, s) = f( g(j(s), t), h(j(s), s, t), j(s), s).
I tried to put spaces to avoid creating a massive jumble of letters.
yeah I think I got that
$\pdv{w}{s} = \pdv{f}{g} \left(\pdv{g}{s}\right) + \pdv{f}{h} \left( \pdv{h}{s} \right) + \pdv{f}{j} \dv{j}{s} + \pdv{f}{s}$.
stabulo
should you have ∂f/∂x * ∂g/∂z * ∂j/∂s in the first term
since g has z and then z has s
w = f( g(j(s), t), h(j(s), s, t), j(s), s)
We want to write x in terms of f, g, h, or j in some way due to the problem wanting that.
x = g so you could write both but they want it in terms of the above.
yeah I can change the notation but I don’t get why it’s just ∂f/∂g * ∂g/∂s
shouldn’t there be another thing in the product
so expanding them would give you ∂f/∂x * ∂g/∂z * ∂j/∂s + ∂f/∂y * ∂h/∂z * ∂j/∂s + ∂f/∂y * ∂h/∂s + ∂f/∂z * ∂j/∂s + ∂f/∂s right
$\pdv{g}{s} = \pdv{g}{j} \dv{j}{s}$
stabulo
ignoring the letters
I'll write it out in full and you can translate it I suppose to compare.
oh yes please
$\pdv{w}{s} = \pdv{f}{g} \pdv{g}{j} \pdv{j}{s} + \pdv{f}{h} \left( \pdv{h}{j} \dv{j}{s} + \pdv{h}{s}\right) + \pdv{f}{j} \dv{j}{s} + \pdv{f}{s}$.
Let me just do a bit of error checking though, etc.
stabulo
I think that's right.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hii
guys i have a question
if you have this function
Can you say that the derivative of this function is equal to the derivative of (x(x-2)(x-1))/(1-x) , -x(x-2) = -x^2 + 2x = -2x + 2 right?
Yeah you can
but if you do that , now 1 belongs to the domain of the derivative isnt that an issue?
It does not because that function would already be defined for x≠1
so imagine you have this function
And you want to study differenciability
( Other points besides one dont matter because for sure this function is differenciable there ) , what about in the point x = 1?
the =1 case is already included in the other part of function
yeah you right
so if f'(1) is equal on both, the function is differentiable
so one more question , if you do the derivative by definition would you get the same thing as -2x + 2?
Yes
The denominator would still give you the factors to reach at -2x+2
You can try it later
ok ty
@fervent arch Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @fervent arch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
P and Q are subgroups of a group G and |P|, |Q| are relatively prime, prove that P∩Q = {e}
consider the order of an element in both
@split pier Has your question been resolved?
😭😭 thank you, oh damn it was this simple
.close
Closed by @split pier
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi I need help !

How do you think when solving limits
wdym solving limits?
im french lmao
i meant what kind of problem?
well it depends
if you are talking about an epsilon delta proof
or just plugging in value and factorizing
@sleek condor factorizing it
idk how should I think of solving the problems
I can factorize it in many diffrenent ways
give an example
Lim x -> -5 = x^2 +3x-10 / x^2 + 6x + 5
I can write that like x^2 +3x-10 / x^2 + 3x + 3x + 5
and then x(x +3) -10 / x(x+3) + 3x + 5
and then -10 / 3x + 5
-10 / -10
= 1
But thats not correct
idk why
this doesnt cancel out
why not
@crimson sedge Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @sweet hollow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@verbal terrace Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@verbal terrace Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
number 4
its in romanian but you can probably decipher it
but what I dont get is
the woman says (as u can see on the second from last line) that because x is a part of R
then then the bigger parantheses (x+3-1)
cannot be equal to 0
what is the logic to this
I personally dont understand how thats possible
determine the real number a for which a o x = a (the 'o' operation is described at the top of the image) for any real number x
<@&286206848099549185>
can you clarify the question are you trying to find an a when x is real?
well first step would be to plug in the a and x
im trying to find an a so that a o x = a for any x, real number
im not askign about the steps since ik them
im asking about the question above
I dont really get it either
I believe it saying if the x value doesnt make that zero then we need to find something to make the other one zero so the whole thing works out
So basically you want the thing to equal zero no matter what x is, so if x+3-1 is not zero, then what would a have to be to make it zero
ok
right
np
.close
Closed by @peak salmon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I know that x_n = ((x_n)(x_n - 1)+1) and x0 = 2, x1 = 3, but is there any way to simplify more?
I was thinking something with factorials because the since xn is defined by 1/(x_(n-1))(x_(n-2))...(x_2)(x_1)(x_0) + 1
But I got stuck there
I would try find an induction
How does that help though
I dont even know what I would put for my inductive hypothesis
you're not being asked to find every solution, and there's obviously a solution when n = 1
Yeah I was gonna say just take 1
What do you think I should do for the hypothesis then?
I know base case is easy
but then what
play around with the n+1 case until you get something helpful
well yeah thats what im saying I got stuck there
I've not managed to find something myself yet
alright
I’ve not tried to get something and wish you good luck as I m falling asleep lmao
alright thanks
yes please
mh...
alright
for n=1 you can use a=2
what do you mean by a
a_1=a
yeah I know
x1 = 2
I know
x1 = 2, x2 = 3, x3 = 7, x4 = 43, x5 = 1806
or sorry x5 = 1807
the pattern is x_n is defined by (x_(n-1))(x_(n-1) - 1) + 1
alright thanks for trying
I missed something
aka this question
I thought you needed help finding xn at all
nah
for anyone else I think there is something with factorials because xn also equals (x_n-1)...(x_2)(x_1)
but of course the xns dont decrease by 1 so I dont know how you would define it with a factorial so maybe im wrong but it looks a lot like a factorial
<@&286206848099549185>
Yeah I took a break but i feel like there are too many patterns for there not to be a way to simplify
however its very simmetric
Yeah
I guess you could rewrite as ((x1 + x2 + ... + xn) + ((x1)(x2)...(xn))^2)/((x1)(x2)...(xn)) but I dont see anything to do from there
@scenic vale Has your question been resolved?
I think $(x_n)$ follows $x_n=x_1\cdot\ldots\cdot x_{n-1}+1$
everg
$x_1=2$
everg
Yeah it does I wrote that already
I was thinking though that maybe there is a way to have everything in terms of x1
Idont know maybe theres not
thanks for trying im probably just gonna give up
.close
Closed by @scenic vale
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
you said x_n=1/...
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
sorry replied to wrong message it was here
.close
Closed by @scenic vale
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
everg
where you put as many x_1 as it is n-1
No its more exponential
Doesnt work
it should be 1807
it expands exponentially I think thats what you missed
$x_2 = x_1 +1$
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
CuteAnimalLover52
and $x_3 = (x^2)_1 + x_1 +1$
.close
Closed by @scenic vale
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
and $x_3 = (x_1^2) + x_1 +1$
CuteAnimalLover52
$x_4 = x_1^4 + 2x_1^3 + 2x_1^2 + x_1 +1$
CuteAnimalLover52
so its exponential not linearly increasing x_1 +1 terms
okk
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
<@&286206848099549185>
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
<@&286206848099549185>
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
.
pls help woth both of them
10 more mins u spammed the helpers role too much for me :p
Can you stop abusing the ping? You pinged early and spammed it 3 times in a row
just help
Please wait patiently, and do not interrupt other channels with your question. Helpers in this server are volunteers, and the server cannot guarantee that someone will be able to help you. By being impatient or begging, you will only turn potential helpers away.
In the meantime, please make sure your channel contains the original question, clearly describes what you have already tried, and states exactly what you are having trouble with. This increases your chances of getting a good response.
.close
Closed by @gleaming glade
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Find the locus of z = (w-i)/(w-2) where w is purely real
Then find z if w moves around the unit circle
I made w the subject and got the line y=1/2 - x/2
I’m not very sure how to interpret when w moves around unit circle
.close
Closed by @undone star
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@swift bridge Has your question been resolved?
is anyone gonna help me?
Take the second derivative
can you explaine?
Do you know what derivatives are or na
yeah
Like how dy/dx is the slope of tangent line and d^2y/dx^2 is change in slope in the tangent line?
If you dont understand that I think it would be best to just watch a video explaining why
If you do understand that then I can try and explain how to apply it
Its best if you just look up what a derivative is, I think the most intuitive for this example definition is graphically, which is hard to show over text
Khan Academy always has good videos
But if you need to do it now, basically the if the second derivative is negative the graph is concave down, and if it is positive it is concave up
Well if you dont know what a tangent line is, you dont know what a derivative is fully
if the second derivative is negative the graph is concave down, and if it is positive it is concave up, and inflection points are when it is 0
do you know how to take second derivatives or na
I understand the tanget line is but i dont know its significance
if that makes sence
like how to find it
it's the graph of a quadratic if that helps
Just take the second derivative and if it is negative the graph is concave down, positive concave up, 0 means inflection point if you need to get it done quick
i just dont know how to find them
but you really should look at all this stuff later
link me?
Everything in that playlist will be helpful
okay
also you should look up and learn what the equation of common equations look like
like polynomials, exponentials, trig functions, etc
link me that too or already on khan?
memorize this
also look up the graphs for e^x and logx and memorize those too
and you should be fine for a while
so for my current question mind helping me with this so i can get it done?
Yeah ive said multiple times
Just take the second derivative and if it is negative the graph is concave down, positive concave up, 0 means inflection point if you need to get it done quick
okay
wdym by second derivative if you can simple explain?
please