#help-13
1 messages · Page 159 of 1
yes because your original answer is wrong
wherever h is lol
I’m dead confused
What are you confused about
this a tets
Bruh is that a test?
i got it, u gotta write h in terms of r from the total surface area equation
H= A- 2pi r^2/ 2pi r???
then before differentiation, u shd put the h in terms of r while writing the vol, it will avoid the dh/dt thing
H= A- 2pi r^2/ 2pi r??? Correct?
wut is A?
Surface area
then put the value to A and get it only in terms of r
A= 100pi
cancelled from denominator
Out
yea
Sorry yes
So r= 2 sqrt5
check again
Sub it in the
Yea
do u understand y we are substituting it before deifferentiating?
thats the main part
Wait what are we substituting in V?
This
in this eqn we sub h in terms of r
yea
we did it bcuz we dont have any data regarding dh/dt which we get after differentiating with product rule without sub h as r
so we sub it
Ohhh 😯
u got it?
after subbing it u might equate to zero n stuff, then you'll get linear eqn in r, solve for r, then when u get r
sub r in this eqn
u got h, u got r wut else do u want? a million dollars?
I got them as 2sqrt5
What did you get
I got different because maybe I did it wrong
calci mistake check it
my eqn is 50π - 9πr²/2 - 2πr² = 0
a freak i didnt diff it sry my bad
really sry for wasting ur time
That’s alright, can you fix it?
its 50π - 9πr - 4πr = 0
yea
was just curious, wuts the value of k u got? sry for wasting so much time
That’s okay, my mind is crazy right now, so I can barely understand at this moment. Is it okay if you show me your working that way I can feel a relief
I’ve done so much questions for this revision in a really busy house
Hence I requested
sry i did it in mind... i dont have paper pen, im in a bed rest rn
Then can you type it?
this is kinda rough.. hope u understand it
wlc
Ok so now, do I restart all of my working out and consider yours?
yea u can get the idea from my work and try to do it on ur own, thats much better
Ok
So what you did was get h interms of r and got the volume
Now, after that, do I differentiate?
yes, after sub h interms of r
After differentiate?
no no, i mean u sub, then u diff
Ok
always remember, dont sub any value after diff, do it b4 diff
Ok
What exactly do I need to do?
What exactly do I need to do
sry?
Like after you wrote it on paper
What do I do
Like did you answer the whole question?
So the whole question is answered?
numerical value?
Nvm nvm
ok
I saw
also u might think
This here all of it answered the whole question?
we had h = 100 - 3r² / 2r already but it was not like h = kr form (this prob is common with most of us)
yes but dont just copy it, it was just a doubt u had that was cleared i hope, so that now u can solve it by urself
Yes
and btw is this ur channel? like everyone gets their own channel?
Yes
how?
It was available so I got in
May I ask how you got 3r^2? It was 2
ok so look up the total surface area i wrote
Ok
Oh yes I saw
I missed that
Sorry
Yes, have a great day, it was so lovely working with you
Thank you very much
Just one more question. Did we get a maximum volume?
u can put the r and h values if u want the max vol
Yes
I have a different question
I have done many questions about z scores but this one is complicated
@smoky whale Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i want to learn how to do mental math, to start i would like to learn how to do addition super quick.
what should i do
practice
start with pen/paper
you can try using the abacus mentally
oh
what i would do before was this
34
+63
in my head
but is this not the best way
?
I'd add the ones place
first
anything that carries over, you can add to the tens place
so here you'd get 4+3=7 easily in your head
nothing caries over
and then do 3+6=9
but remember this was the tens place
so it is really 90
so then 90+7=97
@worldly arrow Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @worldly arrow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
The question is to make an expression for these (roots of polynomials).
this is my work so far
but I am unsure as to if I have come to the right conclusions

also, if it is right is there a pattern depending on the degree of polynomial and the power to which you are raising the sum of pairs, triplets ect. of roots?
also, I may have used non standard notation: the z is just the number of terms.
nahh this has to be a prank
how so?
a lot of notation to be explained imo
How? apart from the z, the rest is standard. The rest is just what I have been taught + websites, textbooks ect. The concepts used are multinomial expansion and roots of polynomials
redpenbluepen has a good vid on this
I presume if you have the advanced role you should now what multinomial expansion and roots of polynomials are
The general definition looks the same to what I have done
i'll try to rewrite it better then
you say polynomials here, but later define cubics. can you define the variables you use
@crimson sedge Has your question been resolved?
@crimson sedge Has your question been resolved?
I checked with some numbers, to which I had the answer to. I got the right answer using the results I got, so I am probably alright with this one. Sorry for torturing you with what my brain decides to come up with lol.
Closed by @magic yarrow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do i do question 1 in exercise 2?
both terms must be 0 for the expression to be zero
both terms also have a factor in common, so set that factor to 0 and solve for x
Why ?
wait true, they could be additive inverses
Yes
my bad
what does setting the factor to 0 mean?
because i think the common factor is (2x-1) right?
yas
so how do i set it to 0?
@toxic crag Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @toxic crag
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$\frac{1}{\frac{a}{b}} = \frac{b}{a}$
riemann
what is your question
which part
this fractioN?
well i dont understnad how that correlates to that
well yeah but how does that correlate in any way to the problem
,tex .sohcahtoa
riemann
i know this
write tangent in terms of sine and cosine
then use this
uh
oh
so
its cos/sin>?
is that the only solution
do you know how to write cotangent in terms of sine and cosine?
what abt it
you really don't need to ping me so often
yeah
this is correct
compare it to this
wdym
compare means to look at them and find similarities or differences
i was explaining the word "compare" for you
wasn't that your question
the answers are the ones that equal to 1/tan
yeah and how do we find ghat
which one of these four equal what you found
this is your answer when i asked you to simplify 1/tan
first
is that the only answer
compare that to cotangent
i did
cotangent is the last choice here
cot x = cotangent of x
Closed by @distant pecan
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin
2. I have begun but got stuck midway
3. I got an answer but I'm told it's wrong
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked
5. I have a question about someone else's worked solution
6. None of the above
yes can you simplify it further
yes
there are other ways to solve this
but this one works too
you know this identity sin(x) = cos(90-x)?
sin(x ) = cos(90 - x) = cos(y)
that makes sense
you have it write there
no no no no
sin(x)= 6/10
x is not equal to 6/10
Closed by @glossy ore
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
so i know the solution for this
i just need to know what exactly is the process going on here exactly
i.e. what am i actually picking as my stars and bars
like, i guess the 3 warehouses are the bars?
but that doesnt make much sense since they are all indistinguishable...
The warehouses or the books?
the books
So why would the warehouses as bars not be correct
okay so you will have 3 groups
separated with two bars
oh so ig it would be 3002 choose 2
hm
fair enough okay
Yes that seems right
Closed by @stray spruce
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey, been stuck on this question for a while (multivariable calc) and while I've tried reading the solution I don't really understand it - it suggests using a parametric transformation that looks like this, but why are you not able to just convert it to spherical coordinates and then move on? Shouldn't the values for y be enough to decide an angle 0 and the angle for rcos(phi) be decided by the z > 0?
I don't really understand what you accomplish with the parametrics either, is it needed to calculate the jacobi-matrix? 🤔
ah wait I guess it's because going to spheric would mean you'd be calculating the volume rather than the surface area, is there no way to calculate the volume as a integral of 3 variables and then get the surface area from that? Considering the derivative of the equation for volume is literally the area equation
@wispy forum Has your question been resolved?
@wispy forum Has your question been resolved?
@wispy forum Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
This is a computing question, but it is related to Fermat's Little Theorem. The task is to calculate a^b^c (mod 10^9 + 7) efficiently, but I am having trouble understanding their solution. The solution states "Fermat's Little Theorem tells us that a^(p - 1) ≡ 1 (mod p), so we can calculate a^(b^c (mod 10^9 + 7 - 1)) (mod 10^9 + 7)."
For example: a = 3, b = 4, c =5,
Let x = b^c (mod 10^9 + 7 - 1), then the answer is a^x (mod 10^9 + 7).
I don't understand how they can do it this way.
Could you help me try to understand it better? I don't get how the answer can come out like that
the way they presented the theorem is kind of misleading ig
what the theorem says is $a^n \equiv a^{n \pmod{p-1}} \pmod{p}$
kappa
wait... I've never seen it in that form
when n=0 you get a^{p-1}==1 (mod p)
wait how does it become a^{p-1}==1 (mod p) when n = 0?
$0 \equiv p-1 \pmod{p-1}$
kappa
and a^0=1
right
thats really not what the theorem says
oh thats the way it was presented to me
i would imagine that follows from the theorem
Let me see if this works:
Fermat's Little Theorem
tells us that
$a^{p - 1} \equiv 1 \pmod{p}$
, so we can calculate
$a^{b^c \pmod{1e9 + 7 - 1}} \pmod{1e9+7}$
with modular exponentiation.
Qang
Right, so how does that transition into $a^{b^c \pmod{1e9 + 7 - 1}} \pmod{1e9+7}$?
Qang
Use it on n=b^c
reduce the exponent b^c modulo (10^9 + 7 - 1) instead of modulo 10^9 + 7
wdym reduce it
what did ΣΑC mean that the theorem doesn't say that
find the remainder b^c is divided by (10^9 + 7 - 1)
what kappa said just wasnt the standard statement of FLT
the way i wrote it isnt FLT,
bc of euler's thm
now whats going on is that if you want to reduce the exponent you have to reduce mod phi(p) = p-1
Sorry I don't really understand that
youll learn it later, just use the thing i wrote for now
what pokemon is that
if yorue curious search eulers totient theorem
axew
ok thx
.close
Closed by @crisp brook
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
i meant the platapus but ok
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So first find the ratio of the sides
is 3/4
wait
for the first one
RS = 18 and UT = 36
so wouldn't it be 1/2?
since 18/36
when you compare similar figures, you are comparing the left to the right
so its 18/14
thats equal to 36/DC
ohhhh
ye
i have one more question
for this one i have a possible answer and im not sure if im right
but thats just for the ratio of the sides
i know
one sec
oh hell no bro
this is a five minute convo
aint no need for a break
WHAT
tiem is money
whats
the
...
im lowkey lost
:)
ok to figure out why
we must look at how area is calculated in relation to how sides are calculated
how would i find the area if i don't have the height?
no height needed
disregard that figure
imagine a line
lines are 1 dimension
adding on a plane, like a trapezoid takes 2 dimensions, length and width
okay
when you scale a figure, you're multiplying both dimensions by the same factor. For example, if you double the size of a rectangle, you're doubling both the length and the width. So the new area is the old length (doubled) times the old width (doubled), which is four times the old area.
so, the area ratio is what????
you got this
24/48
DC is 48
NONONONO NO TRAPEZOID
DISREGARD THE PROBLEM
OH
OH
MB
I AM TEACHING GEOMETRY MORE IMPORTANT
this is why im confused
i was literally just learning geometry
and then suddenly it switched to trig
and now its whatever tf this is
So, when you scale a figure, you multiply both dimensions by the same factor
yes
so double a rectangle, you double both length and width
so the new area is the old length doubled times the old width, so four times the old area
so the area ratio is the square of the side ratio
thats why sides are denoted as for example 3 inches
while area is 3 in^2
and volume (3 dimensional) would be 3 in^3
👯♂️ 🎉 👯 🥳 👯♂️ 🎉 👯 🥳 👯♂️ 🎉 👯 🥳 👯♂️ 🎉 👯 🥳 👯♂️ 🎉 👯 🥳 👯♂️ 🎉 👯 🥳
if ur doing geometry, the best book is geometry by ray c jurgensen
i have
5 days left.
to finish.
everything.
bruh what did u do
now i am interested
add me, i need to see the journey unfold
there is no journey.
if i dont finish
youll never hear
actually nevermind, i probably wont commit bc im lazy
from me
ever again :D
wait how much have u completed
uh
i dont want to tell u
youll make fun o fme
i need to scoop sis
40%..
BUT.
ok u still have 5 days tho
NO
5 DAYS ISN'T ENOUGH FOR SOMEONE LIKE ME

my schedule is packed
like rn
i gtg
can’t finish that question
are u like the child of those asian moms on yt
because i have practice
yes
gl
thats insane
you know what u should tell her
wgat
its like people at the movie
like involution u know
one person gets up in the movies
THEN EVERYONE GETS UP SO THEY CAN SEE
and in the end people are climbing skyscrapers and renting apartments to see the screen
in the end you and your mom suffer
ok goodluck
LOL
i need to find
one of those people
that enjoy doing math
and treat it like an activity
and ask them for answers
that would double my speed
No because we aren't here to give you answers
yeah i had an asian mom but she never breathed down my neck bc i was naturally good at math and able to skip grades and stuff
ur lucky
if u had my mom
she would still breath down ur neck
even if u are good at math
yeah
i know that
i know like my cousins
its like really scary
bc they go to high schools or places like that where there is high suicide rates
its super scary seeing those stories
goodluck tho
bounce back
ultimate mood killer srry
i didnt even realize it lol
goodluck tho
@crimson sedge Has your question been resolved?
please let them work it out themselves if possible
!nosols
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
The more the helpee works out on their own, the better! :)
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone explain what do they mean by what yhe result implies
i got 0 for the definite integral
i think it means area above x axis is = area below x axis
maybe
thanks so much!!!
.close
Closed by @eternal locust
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin
2. I have begun but got stuck midway
3. I got an answer but I'm told it's wrong
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked
5. I have a question about someone else's worked solution
6. None of the above
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
I think the question can be rephrased as what is the probability that a male person will watch the world series
Which indicates you would have to find the number that will watch among males
The total of males
Which is 121
Maybe
Hmm interesting
So go with it
Closed by @winged kelp
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I guess might be a bit of a weird question; but for pigeonhole principle questions, what's a good way to recognise what are your 'boxes' and 'pigeons'?
i kind of struggle with recognising which one is which sometimes
oh hm i think i got an idea
.close
Closed by @stray spruce
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
dude i cant understand
i do everything right
ane the variables arent orthogonal
ive done like 10 of these
and cant get it right
I project 5,0,-7 onto 0,4,2
so dot them together over dot 0,4,2
-14/20
to (5,0,-7) - (-14/20) (0,4,2)
and the result is not orthogonal to 5,0,-7
here's a secret
you can row reduce before you do gram schmidt
this makes things a lot easier
,w row reduce ((0,4,2),(5,0,-7))
🙏 🙏 🙏
@crimson sedge Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I got a question..
If 1000 elves compete for a place at the Christmas meeting, the selection process goes like this.
There is a Elder elf which stands at the start of the row of the 1000 elves. The counting begins at the elder elf. There are 1001 elves in the row (including elder elf).
So every 2nd elf (including elder elf) is disqualified. Then with the left overs, this process repeats until elder elf is disqualified. The left over elves are the ones that get to attend the meeting.
Thus, how many elves attend the meeting?
I said 200…
wait so the elves stand in a circle right
Yes
why does this seem like LR? 
eh nvm
its not
so we start counting with the elder elf (who let's say is #1), then elf #2 is out, elf #3 is in, #4 is out and so on
then elf #1000 is out, #1001 is in, and ...
Yes
we get right back to the elder elf who is out
1001# would be elder elf again.. right?
oh yeah 💀
just curious where did you get this question from?
i just did one that's almost identical to this 2 days ago
it's .close
.close
Closed by @onyx grail
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how is answer 0?
who's saying the answer is 0?
the site lol
i'd like to disagree with them
i have 1 right?
111 = 3*37 in prime
so this one works and all others are multiples of 111 so they have at least one factor more
so answer is 1
111 is 3*37
yeah
so 1 is the correct answer right?
yes
Y'all remeber that??
Or just pure magic
Oh nah you divided by factors okay
lol i used primality test
111 is divisible by 3
Yes yes yes
I thought they used the table of 37 ☠️
well it is clear that the rest are divisible by 111 and either 1,2,3,...,9. So it is really the only like important one to check
since i could've just added 1+1+1
btw can you show where on the site it says the answer is 0
Sue them
@primal lodge Has your question been resolved?
i'm guessing they just had a typo
and wanted a prime instead of 111
here
hm
anyway it's okay not a big problem
you guys confirmed it
i was not sure myself since i had 37*3 as well
thanks
.close
Closed by @primal lodge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What is cos30/cos33?
I mean
Using binomial approximation, since theta is very small, cos3 is 1
Sin 3 is uh π/60
i mean if you just want to do that why not plug it into a calculator
lol
and see how close you are
you are using an approx.
Closed by @eternal patrol
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
i dont have pen/paper right now, but if you dm me ur working out as screenshot i can glance over
GL
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Solution please
what have you tried ?
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin
2. I have begun but got stuck midway
3. I got an answer but I'm told it's wrong
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked
5. I have a question about someone else's worked solution
6. None of the above
i see an error in your work, $x(x+3)-2(x-3) \neq (x+3)(x-3)(x-2)$
FireBlazer
Send me solution please
solution to the problem or the proof of my last message?
Solution to the problem
!nosols
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
also, the solutions are very ugly, just saying
most likely there's a typo in the problem statement
if the 6 was -6 in the third radical, the equation would be nicer i think
@rancid cloud Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone explain to me what the arrows mean?
I'm having trouble trying to figure out the significance of the arrows
I know $f$ means function, but what does $GL_{2}$ mean as well?
Nanners
Does it mean $GL_{2}\mathbb{R}$ implies all the real numbers except 0?
Nanners
That being said, why is the bottom arrow different from th e top...
$GL_{2}(\mathbb{R})$
rbit
oh is the 2 significant of a 2x2 matrix?
this is the set of all invertible 2x2 matrices over the field R
which forms a group under matrix multiplication
okay i kind of get it...
Wait okay so...
i know it has something to do with how
if the det is not equal to 0
then the matrix is invertible
rbit
this declares that f is a function that maps elements from set A to set B
OH and i GET IT (i think) the fact that $(ad - bc) \in \mathbb{R}$ means that it IS a homomorphism because the matrix on the left can be both mapped to the same thing
Nanners
$x \mapsto y$
rbit
also this actually defines the function, how elements are mapped exactly, you may also often see this as just f(x) = y
wait first of all, do you know what a group homomorphism is?
Not conceptually but I kind of know the definition
but you know groups right?
yes
in general homomorphism can be seen as structure preserving maps/functions. So we can actually define homomorphisms for all kinds of structures like groups, rings, fields, vector spaces, ...
As for groups, a group homomorphism f: G1 -> G2 needs to satisfy the condition that f(g*h) = f(g) * f(h) for all elements g and h in G1
@zealous summit Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm stuck on making it a perfect squared trinomial, i tried using complete the square but I'm confused on how to get the third term
use the formula
using complete the square
Do you know what to do?
i tried taking the half of 16 then square it with 2
but im kinda confused after that
What do you mean square it with 2?
uh (b/2)^2
And what value did you get?
This is right
This is it
Ah so the third term is 64?
well show the steps up to this point perhaps
on paper
square it with 2
Is a redundant statement, "square it" already means raise to the second power, so you didn't need to say "with 2"
oh
mb but this is the third term or no?
You applied the formula, and that's what you get, so what are you confused about?
Closed by @autumn bane
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Let $f(x)$ be a real polynomial, and assume that $a$ is a real root with multiplicity $\geq 2$. Show that $a$ is a root of $f'(x)$.
Michael
Dunno how I can show this. Any ideas?
I understand it of course when I look at some specific graphs, but it's just to show it mathematically which is difficult
Say the multiplicity of $a$ is $m \ge 2$, then [f(x) = (x - a)^mg(x), ] right?
A Lonely Bean
Aha, yes
What's f'(x) then?
Yeah, what would that yield?
Correct, except that x should be m in the very beginning
oh yes, oops. That was a typo
Michael
And when we plug in x = a, what does f' become equal to?
0
Yup
since both terms become 0
As a sidenote here, it may look like the fact that m >= 2 was not used
here's a question: at what point in that proof did we rely on that? ^
was already typing that when you said it lol
Hint: ||When would 0^(m-1) be undefined?||
Uhm
Ah yes, then if m is less than 2, it becomes 0^0 or 0^negative which is undefined
Alright so it fixes itself basically?
Yup, so the case m = 1 has to be considered separately
Yeah
And you will see that the term (x - a)^(m - 1) just becomes 1
Hence the conclusion there is different
Closed by @unkempt scarab
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Okay I give up. I tried solving this one complex analysis excercise for 30 mins now. I think I'm making a mistake with the singularities I think! I basically have to integrate funciton along the curve. I first trie to use residuetheorem but didn't manage to fufill al the conidtions to use it. The correct solution is a btw. second picture is residue theorem!
My problem is that no matter how I integrate I always get 0

I tried applying resiude theorem by splitting the integral with partial expansion to (i/2)/(z+i) and (-i/2)/(z-i) but I can't use residue theorem since the curve isnt around i
why do you think an answer of 0 is a problem?
- it's not an option the mulitple choice so wrong
and that would be only true for sets without a singularity
and I have singularity +i/-i
there's no singularity within the curve though
you are right
huh
the thing is the solution says a)
and I don't think that they would make such a mistake
hmmm
doesn't seem right, there's a language issue I guess but I think that should be 0...
that's a simple closed curve right?
yeah the function is holomorphic in the region they gave you
but I think they meant for it not to be
or wait
is that supposed the be an i
because in the multiple choice
there is also that weird thing
and why would the say pi*1
that did seem strange to me
oh yeah they write it like that in the answers
that is
also
you don't need to do partial fraction expansion for stuff like this
here you could calculate the limit of (z - i)/(z^2 + 1) as z -> i or for simple poles you can just differentiate the denominator (idk if you've seen that yet)
Closed by @placid flower
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
I have seen that actually you are right
just in another context
we looked at finding the order of poles
yeah it's smart to also do that here
.close
Closed by @placid flower
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I find Laurent-Series around 3i of this function?
Should I start by doing +3i -3i
or getting out the 4
out
I think I got it nvm
.close
Closed by @placid flower
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Ab//cd
Ab=bd
How to proove
<@&286206848099549185>
Prove that abd is equilateral
Yes
Can u help me
Thxx
hmm were there no other givens?
Is that parallel or some other notation
Parallel
No
U guys think there's something wrong with the question?
you can prove the two triangles congruent but i’m not sure if you can prove them to be equilateral triangles..
Ad bd are equal so isosceles triangle so angle dab=abd
as far as i know to prove a triangle to be equilateral you need to prove the 3 angles to be congruent or the 3 sides to be congruent
you can’t do either of them here
How do I prove the 2 triangles are congruent?
so can you find 2 angles that are congruent here?
it's not fully constrained i think, can't you do this?
Abd =bdc alternate interior angle
my wifi is really bad so i can’t load the image LMAO
wait it loaded
i’m not sure what you mean by that though?
Continue parallel lines to left
And draw
Can u show the diagram
And name points on the drawn parallel
E and f
wait how does that help prove them to be equilateral
Then adf=bad and adf+bdc+adb=180 but adf and bdc are equal
And equal to the the 2 angles of the needed triangle
After substitution all 3 angles will come as equal and triangle is equilateral
what.. i’m getting confused by the diagram now
where even is c and e and f
wait ignore c
just e and f
This
is e on top and f on the bottom?
Yes well I guess e had no use tho
I will end up confusing you more so I guess wait for someone else to answer sorry
isn’t adf an obtuse angle while bad is acute
Can you post a diagram with construction
Wait I took wrong sides as equal bruh I solved another question I solved for ad and db equal
@junior wasp Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @junior wasp
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone explain how second option is correct
hmm what makes you think its not convergent?
hmm i am clueless actually
i just saw solution f ta
I just ask because to me this looks like an unweighted average
and it doesnt appear that any of the terms are gonna be greater than 1
means ?
so assuming it doesnt bounce around
yea, its a mean
the subsequent term in the sequence is the average of the previous two
right
and it looks like the terms are gonna be capped out at one
just hold on one thing in this sol is not getting into my head
ohh
so just to me, id be skeptical if i was told this did not converge
capped out ? what does that mean ?
no term of the sequence will be bigger than one
are there more than the two options you're showing?

yeah
yea i was curious too
i will post that
it is mutiple correct question
i understood why the 4th option is correct
but unable to understand the second last line here
lmao how did you know this
he referenced the fourth option earlier
in the solution ta says 4th option
yeah
im not really sure why they carried on writing after showing that (4) was true
oh i see
idk but does this thing like hold true for any sequence ?
or does it just apply in this particular question
uh that should just be true for any sequence
if you loosen what "equals" should mean for limits tending to infinity or not existing
you youre adding all the terms together, and then you get the telescoping right
then assuming youre adding up to some $m$, you have $a_{m-1} + 2a_m = a_0 + 2a_1$
ohh
jan Niku
he uses this property to get the limit
ohh then ig i understood why it converges to 2/3
i mean they havent really shown its convergent
just that if it is convergent, it must converge to 2/3
from what I can see, its hard to follow bc you're sending fragments of the solution
ohh, that sounds confusing
my bad just hold on i will send all at once
@crystal raptor @violet flume this is the whole solution
from start to end
yeah so they've really only proved this
for example if i had the recurrence $a_n = -a_{n-1}$
ΣΑC
show that its ||bounded and increasing|| ?
its not monotone it bounces around
yeah that original
yeah checked first 4 values, the valuses like oscilated
isnt monotone
up and down
oh 
yeah
so is the fucntion converging ? or are we assuming it converging and then finding what it might converge to ?
in what they've written they've assumed it converges and found what it would converge to
ohh
it is atleast not clear to me that they have actually shown it converges in the first place
idk just google like recursive sequence limits
where is there even a division happening
consider what the limit of that second piece is
wait
2 + 86^n/100^n ?
so 2 + inf/inf ?
focus on the angles
idk i feel i am dumb or something, lately i am not even applying basic simplifications
ohh
is it same for series of r^n for r < 1
is what the same
limit as n tends to inf
limit as n tends to inf of series r^n for r < 1
$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}r^n\ , r < 1$?
ΣΑC
would this be converging ?
yeah
you actually need |r| < 1, but then yes
Closed by @untold shadow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
it does not converge to zero, it converges to something else
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello. Is it possible to create a function for the following wave pattern?
If so, how? I don't know where to begin
it is possible
May I know how?
Because I have no idea about how to make functions out of a drawn wave form
no one does
it is complex to form a function from a graph
i don't know..
Well, from this,, it appears that after the first two oscillations, the frequency doubles
but in alternating oscillations themselves
lagrange interpolation formula
it could give close approximate of function but not exact
yeah..
Closed by @subtle yew
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
