#help-13
1 messages · Page 147 of 1
het hoeft niet een verschilfunctie zijn, je kan dit ook doen met gewoon f(x) of g(x), dit geldt voor alle functies
bij de verschilfunctie weet je dan gwn extra waar f>g en waar f<g
dus eerst bereken je alle snijpunten
ja
en dan vul je m in op de format die ze willen
dan zet je die erbij en zet je een 0 in het stukje van de functie
en dan doe je een testwaarde voor elk stukje na een 0 iykwim
ook voor de eerste 0 en na de laatste
dit is idd vrij logische wiskunde
alsje wilt moet je me maar dm'en alsje nog wiskunde vragen hebt
is goed zal ik zeker doen
ik denk dat ik toch echt een docent moet nemen
al is het maar 1 uurtje per week
want dit is niet te doen
ik moet nog 18 hoofdstukken
van circa 50 bladzijdes per
ik wil gerust helpen maar afhankelijk van hoe zwaar de wiskunde is denk ik dat het misschien wel nodig is
waarom hebje geen docent?
of doe je thuisonderwijs
nee
ik heb mn havo diploma gehaald
maar nu wil ik graag naar de universiteit
daarvoor moet ik wiskunde b doen en een jaartje hbo
ik weet niet of je weet wat die shit is
maar in ieder geval ik moet dus wiskunde b staatsexamen doen
om naar de universiteit te mogen
ik kan de wiskunde zeker want ik ga in september naar de universiteit maar ik weet niks over die Nederlandse examens
dus dit is eigenlijk gewoon totaal los van school of iets
als je op zoekt wiskunde b eindexamen vwo
dan kom je op examenblad.nl
en dan staan er opgaves.pdf
als je erop klikt
dan kan je zien waar ik naar toe aan het werken bent
dat is wat je moet kunnen?
Ja
oke lemme check brb
dat is het eind doel
maar ik doe het hoofdstuk per hoofdstuk zodat ik de basis heb
ik heb een jaar om dit te kunnen
nja tot mei
3 uurtjes per dag
hebje verder nog dingen of is het echt enkel dit
dit is het ongeveer
het is zeker pittig
ongeveer wat ik moest kennen maar dan wel in 1 toets natuurlijk
hebje nog fysica en wetenschappen en gewoon school? of is dit echt het enige dat je gaat doen
nja hbo
maar daar doe ik niets
het is behoorlijk makkelijk
qua echt heel makkelijk
dus het enige wat het kost is tijd maar geen inzet
daarom 3 uurtjes per dag 's avonds
ahja zo
Mijn concentratie is nog goed 's avonds enz want ik doe vrijwel niets behalve komen op dagen
en dan 's avonds hier veel tijd in stoppen
ik denk alsje zeg maar minimaal werk doet voor je hbo dat het wel kan
het is wel beetje dom plan van me
maar ja ik wil echt graag universiteit doen
dus dan maar zo
nja heel erg bedankt man
ik snap m
.close
Closed by @red basin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, I need help in understanding how step 1 has proceeded into step 2
Why and how did the variable change from t to x
it doesn't match with their substitution but variable in general does not matter, it's still same integral
and bounds are still same even after coming back to the x
as you can see
(already changed according to the previous one)
Closed by @shadow kite
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
x^n + (-x)^n is 0 if n is odd and 2x^n if n is even
Idk how they got rid of the negative
reindexing
I'm not sure what that is
right so how do Ik what to put
Ann
$e^{-x} = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^n x^n}{n!}$
Ann
with me so far?
yes
$\cosh(x) = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{1 + (-1)^n}{2} \cdot \frac{x^n}{n!}$
Ann
agree or disagree?
idk what you did there
i added e^x and e^-x termwise and multiplied the 1/2 in
where did the 1+ come from
did you factor out x^n
actually nvm I see what you did
agree
ok
$\frac{1 + (-1)^n}{2} = \begin{cases} 1 & n \text{ is even} \ 0 & n \text{ is odd} \end{cases}$
Ann
agree or disagree?
yeah so
what happens from here is that all the terms with odd n are killed
and the ones with even n stay
so you get $\sum_{n \text{ even}} \frac{x^n}{n!}$
Ann
oh I see they're killed becuase it results in 0 right
is that why the negative disappears?
why did they get x^2n
yeah sure
you understand this?
yes
well the first even number is 0 eh
@viscid pendant Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
,w variance(4, 1, 5, 2, 8, 6)
Do you guys have some tips to speed up the proccess?
var(X) = E[X^2] - E[X]^2 is probably faster to compute than the other definition
are you able to calculate the mean of (4, 1, 5, 2, 8, 6)?
yeah
now calculate the mean of the squares
of the data
hmm wolfie calculated sample variance
did you want a sample of population variance?
mean of (4^2, 1^2, 5^2, ...)
ah ok, thats population variance then
,w population variance(4, 1, 5, 2, 8, 6)
put commas between the numbers and use a decimal point instead of comma
yes
,w population variance(.4, .2, .5, .15, .75, .5)
the sample variance version is not as nice
E[X^2] is the mean of the squares. E[X] is the mean of the original data
yes
,calc 24.333 - 18.777
Result:
5.556
,calc 4.333^2
Result:
18.774889
should be 18.7777 (remember to use enough decimal places before rounding)
its the same as wolfie
^
yes, population variance is 5.555 for the first one
thats for the second set you had
yw :)
Closed by @karmic jungle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how to integrate 7/5^x
Ignore the constants for a second
how do you integrate 1/5^x at least
That's for 1/x
$\int a^x dx = \frac{a^x}{ln(a)} + C$
despairful_deltoid
Yeah you take the natural log of the base
like ln 2 is .69
$\frac{1}{5^x} = 5^{-x}$
despairful_deltoid
how do I do that
sub u = -x
so 5x^u/ln 5
idts
?
i dont think so
Oh
mb
,tex .int rules
rie.mann
the bottom row isn't familiar?
Ok so
When we sub u = -x
we need to differentiate both sides
so u becomes du and -x becomes -dx (because d/dx(-x) = -1)
du = -dx
Closed by @tropic glacier
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@viscid pendant Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
It is correct, yeah, though you can cancel that 2 out in the end
How do I change the indices
You want to start from n = 1?
Basically replace every n with n-1
right
Yup, and (-1)^(n-1) is the same as (-1)^(n+1)
how come
Oh and it should be n=1 in the upper summation since you did the replacement there
right
(-1)^(n+1) = (-1)^(n-1) * (-1)^2 = (-1)^(n-1) * 1 = (-1)^(n-1)
Yeah and starts with the same sign as well
@viscid pendant Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @viscid pendant
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i do ii?
What did you try?
well i put it into combination notation and thats just messy
Okay, what's the probability that Linda hits a bulls eye in 1 shot?
1/5
Yeah, and the probability of missing?
4/5
oh im talking about part 2
Oh
Yeah the logic still holds. Say it it takes n hits
What's the probability of taking exactly 1 shot in n hits?
(1/5)^n
Why?
That's the probability that she takes all the shots bulls eye
She needs to take EXACTLY one and miss the rest
oh yes
Or better yet, what's the probability that she misses all?
(4/5)^n?
Yes
ohh
So what's the probability that she takes atleast 1? Are the events of taking atleast 1 and none mutually exhaustive and exclusive?
No, 0.9=1-(4/5)^n
Yes
So (4/5)^n=0.1
You can work it out now ig
Closed by @hard yoke
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can anyone tell me the Basic linear graph skills?
@severe flume Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @severe flume
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how did they cloncluded first function and second function
what do you mean?
imean why is f(x) is first function there
first function where
the notation man
you sent a picture of an entire page of math
when you say "there"
it is hard to tell which of the 20 instances of f(x) you are referring to
in the question where roman numerals are written
those roman numerals are first and second function
as in pic mentioned as 1 and 2
and i want to know how they concluded which to be the first and which to be second function
they chose the first function to be the function that isn't being differentiated, and the second function to be the function whose second derivative is being taken
@steady elk Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
unable to solve it.
ℝamonov
oh yeah. I'm sorry.
or in your other attempt, where's
$$\frac{-b^2}{4x^2 -9}$$
coming from
ℝamonov
yeh
Closed by @shy pebble
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I don't know what to do after finding the scale factor.
@shy pebble Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, I have these formulae regarding the transformation of the standardnormal distribution, the transformation from normal distribution
and the calculation of the distribution funktion for the standard normal distribution
I tried inserting 1 for x, and the result is not 0,841
What am I doing wrong?
You shouldn't replace the variable of integration with 1
How can I make it so it's not an absolute number, but a relative amount (I suppose that 0.8 means it's an 80% of the total)
Oh, what would I insert for x then?
Now you have nothing more than a glorified constant function being integrated
Just let it be x
I think you're only supposed to change z
Here on the 2nd picture, you can clearly see he is using the same symbol, and as argument inserting a 1
Which would be the z in this formula
So excuse me, what should I change?
I don't have much experience with integrals
Ahh I'm dumb
I get you now
the x and z are different variables
I treated them as the same
mb
damn why is my result exactly twice as much as the result I'm searching for?
yes
Closed by @rapid harbor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I am watching a video that helps me go thorugh my question book but I am confused why is he drawing the coloured in brackets when the question doesn't use a greater or equal to sign
where exactly
x =< -1/2
this is to find the domain
is written at the top
because thats their choice of cases
they chose to first consider
x =< -1/2
then -1/2 < x =< 3
then presumably 3 < x
why is it their choice of cases
look at the original inequality
the original just has <
how else can you solve if not split into case?
nothing to do with this.
but the original inequality shows that
the original question could be any of <, =<, =, >, >= signs
and you still need to split into cases
x+1 = 1 and -x-1 = 1

> not =
But thats not all.
You are splitting into 2 cases based on the sign of x+1
in particular you should recall definition of absolute value
yes
@vapid sand sorry so this ^ you familiar with it
yep
For |x+1| > 1, we apply the definition on |x+1|
,, \abs{x+1} = \begin{cases}x+1, & x+1 \geq 0\-x-1, & x+1 < 0\end{cases}
you see how this splits into 2 cases based on the sign of x+1
if you look at this
oh so it can just be >
we include the equality case
inside x >= 0
but we could instead include ot on x < 0
x =< 0
and the definition is valid
oh I see
you need to include the equality case somewhere
does the >= exist to say "this number is also included don't forget it"
Your original question does these 3 cases
x =< -1/2
-1/2 < x =< 3
3 < x
because if it was x>0 -x<0 it would have like a gap in the middle
you need to include all real numbers however you chop your cases up
notice the union of all 3 intervals is the real line
mhm
This is also valid
x < -1/2
-1/2 =< x < 3
3 =< x
ok I see
so let me summarise this
you have the >= to show that that number is included in the whole total segment of the number line correct?
because it if were all >
there would be gaps in the graph if we were to plot it
@jaunty mural
You have an equality you want to solve over all real values of x
however you split your cases, the cases must still encompass all possible real values
like you say, no gaps.
perfect then
I get it now
and thats how they split the cases
Green, Black, Purple
It must encompass all of the x-axis
Closed by @vapid sand
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Please help
have you found the inverse yet
btw that's not how it works
you need to find the inverse of f first, in this case g
THEN you can differentiate it
I mean, you can't always find the inverse just like that. And the result g'(b) = 1/f'(g(b)) also is correct for as long as g = f^-1
So you don't really want to find the inverse...
So im looking for a really smart way to rewrite that function ?
you find the inverse first
right?
eh
letse see if you made a mistake while differentiating
yup
you did
spot the mistake
wait

no
ur right
lol
we kinda do need to know what g is here tho apparently
seems to ask for it in terms of g
Eh, there's a way.
I’ve had a similar question but it was way easier there it’s unfortunately in German but the idea was the same
sub x -> g(x) in the original equation.
And you'll get the result.
Without having to find g.
Though of course, if you'd like to find something like g(x) you're free to do so. But it's unnecessary.
what do you mean by sub x -> g(x) I don’t have g(x)
f(x) = e^(x-1) + 2 + 2x
f(g(x)) = e^(g(x)-1)...
That's what it means to sub.
If you get g(x) anywhere, write it as g(x) only.
You don't need to know what it is.
ok what would be the next step then ? I just don’t see any way to eliminate the e since i cannot pull a ln() out of the air ?
The solution they asked you to show doesn't make sense to begin with. The function f' is a function of x, then you are evaluating it at g. There is simply no way to have an x floating around in the denominator like that. You're never going to get around the fact that at some point you are plugging in g into all the x's.
The whole idea is to get e^(g(x)-1) because that's in your working. And you need to remove it.
From here you can get its value in terms of other terms.
What are you talking about?
I mean ok I subed the g(x) in f(x)
Now I have
f(g(x)) = e^(g(x)-1))+2+2g(x) how does me having the e^help tho
Do I maybe have to integrate the derivation of f‘(g(x) and see if I get anything ??
e^(g(x)-1) +2+2g(x) ?
no, other than that.
Do you remember the proof for g'(x) = 1/f'(g(x))
Yes
How does it begin?
By finding the derivate of f ?
f(g(x)) = ??
f'(g(x)) * g'(x) = d/dx(??)
That's how it goes.
You should check your notes...
So I am looking for the derivation of f(g(x))
Just check your notes, please.
Is this what I’m looking at coach ?
This should be the same I somehow should now be able to just transform them they must be equal 100%
Are we just going to ignore everything I said so far?
g(x) = f^-1(x)
f(g(x)) = f(f^-1(x)) = x
Do you want me to transform the f(g(x)) so I will result at the to g(x)=..:?
I want you to transform the f(g(x)).
But because then you'd get the result e^(g(x) - 1)
=
g(x) is fine because you need it in your final answer.
Think for yourself. Why do you want to get rid of g(x). We're working only because we NEED g(x).
...
Let's back up for a moment.
This is it when I put it in
X
👍
What's up with discord recommending these random stickers ...
Now I need g(x) on one site right?
You'll put that in the last line here.
...
And you're done.
Dude thanks a lot for taking that time and being a tremendous help
Honestly I was going to leave much sooner. But because it was I who said you don't need g to prove this. I kind of stayed. Lol.
.close
Closed by @hearty flint
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Let A, B and C be sets such that A is a subset of C and B is a subset C prove that A union B = C if only if A =C or B=C. How should I approach proving this problem
Usually equality of sets is proved by showing an arbitrary element taken belong to both sets
suppose $A \cup B = C$. Show $A = C$ or $B = C$
to prove A= B, we have show both cases, ie A is a subset of B and B is a subset of A
yeah my issue is that when I try to prove C is a subset of A or C is a subset of A I do not know if I am doing anything wrong because I would say that let x be an element of c meaning x is an element of B or x is an element of A which would show the subsets?
If x element of A then x element of B implies A subset of B
you can think, every arbitrary element you choose from A belongs to B.
yeah I know that but I guess I am more so worried that my proof is wrong
Do you see the iff statement here?
yea I do
I know if implies that you have to prove both directions
I am just mroe so saying that
when I am proving --> way
because we are already given one way
yes I agree with that
Let x element of A U B, then x element of A or x element of B
yep I agree with that
no its show A=C or B=c
If x element of A, x element of C. ( given A subset of C)
yep I agree with taht
since A U B = C, if x element of C then x element of A or x element of B right?
since they are equal
so we need if x element of A, x element of C aswell if x element of C x element of A
which is A= C right?
since it’s OR, there is one more similar case
not here
Given A U B = C, so both sets are subsets to each other
using this we can show A= C or B= C
notice OR
okay
yep I think so
maybe write the proof and post here
I will type out what I think is correct and tell me if I am right
Latex?
yep I am typing ti out right now
let x element of A, then x element of A U B right?
let x be an element of C. B/C we know that C=A union B then we know that x is an element of A or B which shows that C is a subset of A or C is a subset B.
did I do it wrong?
okay
First to show A= C
we need to show that C is a subset of A
let x element of A, then x element of A U B, since A U B= C, x element of C
similarly the other way for A= B, if x element of C, x element of A U B then x element of A or x element of B, if x element of A then A = B
if not other case
that’s why we see an OR
x element of C can either mean x in A or x in B
yep
yea
if x in A or x in B both cases it’s in union always
ok
so the only cases is when x in C
i think you get a sense of
write it, prolly i can help from that more
okay so you were saying that there are two cases
Can you attempt a proof?
yea
I can help you make it rigour on the go dw
i dod do it
let x be an element of C. B/C we know that C=A union B then we know that x is an element of A or B which shows that C is a subset of A or C is a subset B.
for the -->
because not st sifference
where did we get B/C here?
b/c standign for because
dotdoc.
You can only suppose A U B= C
I mnetion a is asubset of C and b is a subset of c by the givens
you cannot assume that now
why cant i
Well what you have is a two way implication
what I am sayign is that we already know that A is a subset of C always and b is a subset of C always so we only need to prove that C is a subset of A or C is a subset B
You have suppose A U B = C and then prove either A= C or B = C, similarly suppose A= C or B = C show A U B= C
yea I was more so meaning --> for that direction only
When proving the —> direction, only think we have is A U B = C
we don’t know if A subset of B or any of that matter
we need to show it
no A subset C
is given before hand
no, that’s what we need to prove
supposing A U B = C
that’s our —>
$A \cup B = C$ iff $A = C$ or $B = C$
dotdoc.
Let A,b and C be sets such that A is a subset of C and b is a subset of C prove that A Union B =C iff A=C or B=c
I might of typed the question wrong
This is your statement right?
no
Why do I think this problem is wrong? Because its not necessary for A or B to be equal to C for this to hold.
For example, A={1,2}
B={3,4}
C={1,2,3,4}
A and B are subsets of C here and their union is C. And neither of them are equal to C
so the problem is false?
Where did you get this problem from
I was basing it off of another problem
about power sets
and I want wondering if I could provei t using the knowledge that
Well...
if x is a subset of y, then power set of x must be a subset power set y.
the orginal problem was
I have the solution for it
I was more so wodnering if there was another way using that idea but i guess not
how do I end the help section
/end
.close
Closed by @steep sinew
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can i solve this by taking the cross product of the two vectors supposedly spanning, and see if it is the normal?
The set of vectors is obviously linearly independent since they are not scalar multiples of eachother
Just check to see if they lie on the plane
i can do that by just subbing them in correct
Yes
Closed by @torpid urchin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Help
Here is my work
@celest heath Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@celest heath Has your question been resolved?
@celest heath Has your question been resolved?
Umm... You have made a few errors in calculation.
Firstly while calculating the length of major axis, you have written 11 -5, while it must be 11 - (-5) which will compute to 16. Thus, major axis will come to be square root of 256 which is 16.
Also, you aren't properly computing the expression. You have to square the terms inside and then take root. While calculating minor axis, (10-6)^2 is 16, whose square root will be 4. Not square root of 4.
If you rectify those, i believe you should be reaching to the answer correctly.
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have this equation and I want to animate it unrolling. Any ideas how I can do this?
it makes this shape
it is also modeled by this equation on the complex plane
I have calculated its perimeter to be 4
@limber stag Has your question been resolved?
@limber stag Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why do they have it as -log(cos x)
does the function change if you move the -1 inside the log?
Desmos shows the same graph
Does it have something to do with domain/range?
they are the same thing
Closed by @sand locust
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello,
I am trying to find a way to meaningfully display a set of given data. It's about plane crashes and their affects on the pilot. I have the amount of G's experienced and the time they were experienced for. I assume I would want to refer to this data based on the force the person experiences, but how would I used the data I have to do that? I could cancel the seconds in acceleration, but that leaves me with the change in m/s which doesn't really mean much in this case as far as I am aware
you need to figure out when the emergency took place by referring to the g-force experienced by the pilots/passengers?
Not necessarily, sorry I worded it kind of poorly. I have the g-force experienced by the pilots and for how long at the point of impact, I am trying to find some way to manipulate that to show the force (in newtons) they felt so I can compare that to other data points
For example, one crash they may have felt 40 G's for 0.05 seconds and in another they felt 75 G's for 0.032 seconds
Which pilot experienced a greater force (And therefore most likely sustained greater injuries)?
I don't know if newtons is really the units I'm looking for here, that's just what makes the most sense to me
do you know how much the pilot weighs?
It's arbitrary, so I'd just go with 175 pounds
for example: if a pilot weighs 200 lbs and pulls 10g’s, approximately 2000 lbs of pressure would be exerted on his body
That's calculated with F=ma I assume?
Is time ever a factor when considering the force?
Because from what I understand, you can experience high amounts of G's but for only a short period of time before blacking out or further injuries
So there must be some connection between the amount of G's and the time experience that affects you
the longer you experience the amount of g’s for, the more likely you’ll be severely injured
you can spend an entire life time experiencing 1g, but you can only last a short period of time alive at, for example, 10g’s or 20g’s, the body can’t withstand that much force
but a person did survive 214g’s, iirc
Yeah, that was during an F1 crash I believe
So what would be the best way to write that given the data I have?
hmm, you can multiply the amount of g’s by the pilots weight and then include the total time spent by the pilots body exerting that force
If I multiply G by 9.81 to get m/s^2 and then divide by the time I get m/s^3
That's a value I can compare, but I can't really decide what that means physically
Not a bad idea, though that would be difficult to graph I'd imagine
Since it's not just one value
it’s two values, so you could have the force on the y-axis and then time on the x-axis
m/s^3 is jerk
i think
Oh true, I think you're right
Using the two examples from before I get this:
So clearly the second pilot experience a lot more jerk
Hmm, possibly
that should be good enough
Closed by @real crypt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help please
@crimson sedge Has your question been resolved?
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin
2. I have begun but got stuck midway
3. I got an answer but I'm told it's wrong
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked
5. I have a question about someone else's worked solution
6. None of the above
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need some help
Jean puts 12 books on a shelf in random order. Three are by the same author.
What is the probability that those 3 books will be next to each other?
this is a permutations and combinations question but i dont know how to get it into probability
i might be good
I am not good
dear god its evolved
Chloe's bookshelf has 6 books by Smith and 8 books by Jones.
If she removes 4 books at random, what is the probability of removing 2 by each author?
i still have no clue where to start if someone could give me an equation that'd be great
alr nvm this class is awful
.close
Closed by @floral vigil
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can somebody please verify that I did this correctly?
@crimson sedge Has your question been resolved?
you evaluated du/dx incorrectly
d/dx(1+x^3)=3x^2, so the coefficient in front of the integral should be 12pi
@crimson sedge Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
still confused by this
what did you learn from the last time you asked this question
No one's bullying you
Just answer the question so people don't tell you what you already know
i learned that S_0 is in units of meters
the si unit of length is meters
so s= meters
t= seconds
if the _0 means nothing
then a) should = meters
now P_0 is being multiplied by t^2
so that means its seconds are being multiplied by seconds ^2
thats about all i understand about it
To finish p_0, you know
[meters] = [units of p_0] [seconds^2]
Do you know how to solve for [units p_0] using division
yeah would i multiply both sides by seconds^2
That would get you seconds^4 on the right
Read the last word here
so for k_o
so what else was this question asking?
just for that?
like its asking for the si units
i understand that the primary one is meters
the second one is seconds
and then the dimension is m/s^3
What
is this all that this question was asking for?
there is hardly any reference to it in my book
P_0 is not seconds
this because its in second^2?
.
so its because the meters are divided by the seconds?
so its less than a meter?
or because its seconds being divided?
so its double the seconds?
meters / seconds^2 is in terms of SI already
so i dont gotta touch it anymore?
?
Yes
so aslong as i got those variables by themselves they good?
?
I already said yes?
.
Closed by @hybrid wren
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
(f(b)-f(a))/(b-a)
oh
note that this is pretty asking you for the slope between two points
ohhh
what is average rate of change?
(11+4)/(3+2)
15/5 = 3
wait- why did they say it as 'average rate of change'?
as opposed to what
.close
Closed by @inland blade
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
ty I got it
as oppose to the slope
if your function was anything but linear you could not talk about its "slope"
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello can anyone help me find the length denoted by ‘?’ ?
I don't know how to start
may be blind but i don't see a question mark
lmao
<@&286206848099549185>
Can someone confirm my answer
$? = \frac{(l^2-b^2)\sqrt{l^2+b^2}}{3}$
lmaowhat
!show
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
I didn't find any geometrical way of doing it so I used polar from and rotated the point by an angle theta where theta is the angle of inclination of the plank
I needed to find rsin(theta + alpha), but you get the point
? comes out to be $\frac{2}{3}lb\sqrt{l^2+b^2}$
lmaowhat
Made a stupid mistake here, it's supposed to be $\frac{1}{3}\frac{l^2-b^2}{\sqrt{l^2+b^2}}$
lmaowhat
@gusty mason Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @gusty mason
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I don't exactly need help I just need an assurance that this doesn't make sense right?
@lethal summit Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How would i "solve" this?
I think you can make use of the fact that since sum of two odd numbers is even, then at least one of a or b has to be an even prime that is 2.
Basically, if a and b both are odd - then a^x and b^y will be odd as well for any x and y. Then two odd numbers can't sum to an odd number i.e. 129 in this case.
okay makes sense
we want odd + even to get odd
only way to get even is exponentiating even so 2 is the only even prime number hence b or a has to be 2
Yes.
Now, you can just make different cases and solve.
There are only 7 cases to be checked.
Wait. Not even 7 cases. there are only 4 cases.
There are only four primes for x i.e. 2, 3, 5, and 7 for which 2^x is less than 129.
oh i forgot the exponents have to be prime too lol
Perhaps. However, i think that these problems are often solved this way.
cuz a^x can never = 1 unless x = 0
Yeah
Check for these three cases one by one.
b^x = 125
b^x = 121
b^x = 97
Yes.
Exactly.
i did get 2^2 and 5^3 before but wasn't sure how to systematically approach these type of questions
tbh
but okay this makes some sense i guess
Okay. Well, i think that in these questions - you rule out the possibilities and constrict the solution space until it's small enough to check manually.
hmm okay makes sense
Here, only 121 = 11^2 and 125 = 5^3 are possible.
you have another question in mind with similar theme?
Using that, you can get two possibilities:
(a, b, x, y) = (2, 11, 3, 2) and (2, 5, 2, 3)
mhm makes sense
didn't notice b^x = 121 lol i'm blind
Well, not exactly on primes.
anything works
that's somewhat related
obviously lol
It's okay. Actually, you can go systematically about this too.
Biggest number is 121, so if y has to be 2, you have to check for primes less than or equsl to sqrt(121).
So 4 primes to check there.
For cube, range will be even smaller. Primes less than or equal to cube root of 121.


