#help-13
1 messages ยท Page 146 of 1
that's the first thing you should clear up for yourself
because 1+2 makes 3 and not 2
yes and just "crossing out the 2's" does not get you the correct answer
,,\frac{1+2}{2}=\frac12 + \frac22
Are you aware of this?
yeah
You can distribute division over addition
That's what you should be doing in the original
and eventually end up with this
You mean (1 - sin^2)/cos^2 ?
yes
Yeah and just replace 1 - sin^2 with cos^2
cos^2/cos^2?
a/a = 1 for nonzero a in general
How does what happen exactly?
I meant to ask how do you get to that point
@crimson sedge Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @mossy socket
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
please factorise x^3 pluse 6x^2 pluse 12x pluse 16
Use photomath
how can you tell
x^3+6x^2+12x+16
it is 12 x
Rational root theorem?
he means use a calculator to solve this kind of question. or you get try (x+a)(x+b)(x+c) and slowly guess out what are a,b and c.
nah don't use no calculators you won't learn or you could
but RRT it
or equate (x+a)(x+b)(x+c) to your expanded cubic
Youre right i forgot rrt existed lol
How would this help?
two of those constant will be complex btw
so it's really uneasy
and unhelpful
please help
To speeden up the RRT process, notice that every term of x^3+6x^2+12x+16 is positive for positive x, hence all the roots will be negative.
Do you know what's rational root theorem?
you can solve this by identities but which identity i dont know .yes i know
by identities? What kind of identities
I dont know any identity that could be applied to this
i mean algebric identities like a pluse b the whole square
methisalwaysright
It's quite non-trivial way to solve cubics though
yes brother thank you.
actually yes but there is factor theorem which can also help
in order to apply the factor theorem you'd need to have a root
@hollow pewter Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @hollow pewter
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how does that get b
Well how did you get E
i had like 2 seconds left on timer i guessed randomly
wait i was trying to get one leg of CFB
i think bc it's 45-45-90
wait no that's not it
i just assumed since cb is 8 that b had to be 8 above since the distance was that long but i guess tahts the hyptonuse
actually idk i'm going to go again
yeah i think it's because 8 is root 2 * one of the legs
so you find the sides and follow it to where it would go on the plane
no cfb is a triangle itself
i meant cfeb
do they split in fb?
i get that when we do that fb becomes 4sqrt 2
yeah
ohh it has to be same if its origin
when we split triangles does it have to be one point to another what if we split it from f to 8
then it would just be more steps to find fb
since we still would need to split fb into a line i think
oh well i was doing the exact same steps just on cfb i didn't know you wre on the other one
nvm i just figured out we just divide 8 by sqrt 2 then ti gives side
yes that was exactly what i was going to say
and its same as 4 sqrt 2
yes
thanks for help
alr now i have to do my own work
.close
Closed by @hearty oak
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can i help you i have found theanswer
@hollow pewter Has your question been resolved?
@hollow pewter Has your question been resolved?
don't open a channel to help other people who aren't available
.close
Closed by @dire geode
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how would you do this
@haughty python Has your question been resolved?
!show
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
ummmmm thing is i dont even Know how to start this
use definitions of consistent estimator
like i know u gotta get plim y = y
but like
i dont know how to like approach it
should i start by expanding the summation or
ok so then itd be limn-> infinity P(|yn-y| >e) = 0
(where lambda = y cuz idk how to type it on the keyboard)
the second definition of consistent estimator here is the more useful one
Ok Wait but then what ๐ญ
plug your definition of gamma_n into this
use all the information you're given from the problem
ok one sec
but like even when you do that like what are u supposed to like simplify it
Simplifying is generally a good thing to do in math
oops i meant how*
lmao
so like expand and then sub in gamma into wherever theres a exi^3
wait wait
hang on
Nvm ๐ฆ
@haughty python Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
alr so the way i think of it is like
its 3:1 which is 4 total
20 is divisible by 4 easily
with the model they do that times 20/4 bc that's how many times you can fit it
that's how the model works basically if taht's what you were asking
pretty sure
@leaden shore Has your question been resolved?
alr cool
Closed by @leaden shore
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im working on d)
i cant seem to get the induction step right
i need to show the last part of the inequality to then link it back to the start to show that its valid for K+1
okay so you know what you have to show right
yes exactly
so i expanded the left
and got this
but i dont know how to proced from here
maybe squaring both sides?
yeah thats worth a try
okay yeah this problem is a bit annoying
ur prof is using products?
he just use sigma notation cause thats what we were working on at the momment
so he used it as a example of how it can be summed up as a summation
yeah it looks like ur prof just rewrote the problem
didnt really provide anything useful past that
everything from before is restating this
okay i don't want to give you too much but this can be done with relatively simple algebra
note that everything here is positive
yeah thats what i was thinking
is just state that $2 \sqrt(k+1)$ is greater then $\sqrt(k)$
omfg how do u use this
close enough
but the issue is, is that you need to show that the statement is true for the 1/sqrt(k+1) case
,help
A brief description and guide on how to use me was sent to your DMs!
Please use ,list to see a list of all my commands, and ,help cmd to get detailed help on a command!
i found a way thats horrible but works so rn im looking for a nice elegant way
@inland fossil
just so we are on the same page
this is all we need to show right
yea
its a ridiculously tight bound
i cant find any nice inequality approximation tricks that work
ill email my prof
if you want i can show you my horrible way
but i doubt thats what ur prof is looking for
yeah he really wants elegance
ill tag u in #discrete-math once i get a solution if u want lol
hmmm yeah idk if thts exactly what we are looking for
he did it in those pictures and it was super clean when he did
ofcourse he scribbled it and skipped steps in his writing lol
ยฏ_(ใ)_/ยฏ
Closed by @native shuttle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello i just need someone to verify my solution
one second
this is the question
this is the solution for a
this is the solution for b
the answer for B was 1.51 for anyone who is confused on the hand wriring
hmm why do you have a different formula for P in part b than you do in part a?
because it says to begin at 12
for B
oh shoot
i jus realized
i think B is incorrect
but what about A
Result:
1.9978307742067
but you have $P = 100(2.9)^{t/0.65}$ in part b which isn't what you had before
Hayley
you start with 12g, so after one half-life there would be 6g left
the equation
what
no, do it by percent because itll be easier
if you have 1g left over out of 12 starting grams, what percent do you have left?
8.3 percent
okay, so forget about problem (a), look at the question and set up your eqn
there's a negative sign but yes
wait no
P is percent left over after t days
why did you replace 100 with 8.3?
$P = 100(2.9)^{-t}$
Hayley
and you said there would be 8.3% left over right?
so its this but P = 8.3
yeeeeee
thanks a lot ๐
,calc 100*2.9^-2.3
Result:
8.6394203453389
,calc 100*2.9^-2.4
Result:
7.7668479839676
yea
@eager grove Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @eager grove
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Its on non-homogeneous poisson process. This is an assignment Question. I did part (a). I would like a hint or blue print to get started on (b). I am completely lost.
@jovial snow Has your question been resolved?
@jovial snow Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@quartz salmon Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm currently working on a problem involving a water tank that contains 30,000 liters of pure water. The tank is being supplied with water containing 0.008 g/l of a contaminant at a rate of 600 liters per minute. Additionally, 800 liters per minute of the well-mixed contaminated water is being removed from the tank.
I'm seeking assistance in graphically representing the variation of the contaminant's quantity in the tank over time. Specifically, I would like to create a graph that illustrates how the contaminant's concentration changes within the tank as a function of time.
@quartz salmon Has your question been resolved?
@quartz salmon Has your question been resolved?
@quartz salmon Has your question been resolved?
@quartz salmon Has your question been resolved?
err
what have you tried?
hmmm how to add spoiler to picture?
@quartz salmon Has your question been resolved?
when you send an image you click to the eye button then it makes it as spoiler
oh thanks!
๐๏ธ
.close
Closed by @grizzled geyser
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Shivangi deposits Rs. 500 every month in a recurring deposit scheme and receives Rs. 16550 at the end of 5/2 years. The rate of interest given by the bank is ?
@fluid anchor Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
"Stop that."
?
@fluid anchor Has your question been resolved?
@fluid anchor Has your question been resolved?
is it compounded monthly?
@fluid anchor Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm trying to prove the forwards direction of Wilson's theorem: if p is prime then (p-1)! = -1 mod p.
My argument is that if I take all the elements of $\mathbb{I}_p^x$ and multiply them, I'll get the class [-1] since [-1] is the only order two element in the group. The result follows immediately.
zander_a
Does this work?
why does order two have anything to do with that?
Cause I'm multiplying everything together, a = a^-1 iff <a>=2. Thus, the other elements will be cancelled by their inverses
ok and why is -1 the only order two element?
Cause If I'm squaring to 1 mod p I'm either 1 or -1, and the identity is special
why are those the only two?
Hmmm.
My first thought is to look at it as a class like if [a]^2 = 1 then [a^2]=1, so like a^2 = 1 mod p. Or (a-1)(a+1)=0 mod p. As far I see, this implies that it's just 1 and -1 cause division mod p is nice
@wicked brook Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Would this be correct?
i think they want you to use numbers, not a, b, c
because right now i could say (a=-2) and this wouldnt be right
it says sketch tho-
Why wouldn't -2x be right?
As long as its the ax^2+bx+c formula, wont it be all good?
if a = -2 in your eqn then it would point up not down
^^
just pick some numbers
or bound your variables but thats harder
does that go up or down?
does that have any x intercepts?
I think it does
it absolutely does
oh-
its upside down and you shifted it up
it shouldn't
hmm, how about -2x^2 + 4x - 7?
I think that works
Cause its no x-int
it's quadratic so it's a parabola
it's not centered at the axis like your drawing but whatever
Do you know how to check?
you want to see when its equal to 0
so does 0 = x+3 have any solutions?
then it does have an x int
wont there always be a solution for it to equal 0 tho?
lines will always have both a y and an x intercept unless they're horizontal or vertical
the coefficient of x^2 should be negative
b=0 for it to be centered at the y-axis
discriminant must be negative
It says no x-int tho?
there would be 2 solutions
these three combined will give a solution
okay this is true but they are both imaginary so they are not x intercepts
right this is a line though (but I think you just forgot the ยฒ symbol maybe)
-2x^2 + (-3)?
yep a=-2
(since the original thing was -ax^2+bx+c)
no
oh
you put -ax^2+bx+c for some reason?
i thought x^2 was negative?
ah either way put it such that the coefficient of x^2 is -2
yeah so if a=-2 (-ax^2) works out to 2x^2
OHHH
ok first are you going with y=ax^2+bx+c or y=-ax^2+bx+c
So -2x^2 + (-3) is the equation that would work?
Does it satisfy the other condition tho-
what other condition
any quadratic with negative coefficient of -x^2 satisfies the x->inf, y-> -inf thing
dont worry about it
as x approches negative infinity, y will too
yeah that too
does -2x^2 + (-3) satisfy that?
as x approaches plus minus inf, y will approach -inf
it will approach inf instead of coefficient of x^2 is positive
but x should only aprroch -inf
yes since the coefficient of x^2 is engative
yeah im saying IF the coefficient was positive
its like additional info
OHH, that makes sense
Ty! :>
Its just a downwards parabola right?
Because its supposed to be a function
And a parabola wont count as that
yeaah
wait what why not
its a quadratic function
it says on google that a parabola isnt a function-
what
wrong kind of parabola
those that open left or right are not
@crimson sedge dont be confused
OHHHH
it says those arent functions
Okayyy! Thanks!
@crimson sedge Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @next raptor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im supposed to explain why this is false but do not know how: Let n โ N. If n is not prime, then it has a divisor d with 1 < d < n
If n is not prime, then its composite
or
||its 1||
contradiction
assume that there exists a natural number n that is not prime, but it does not have any divisors d with 1 < d < n.
because n is not prime, it must be composite (product of integers). consider n the product of two primes, p and q.
since n = p * q and we implied to not have divisors then n must be also prime and not composite but this goes against our initial assumption that n is not prome
Closed by @cunning tangle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
in this example, we did we add pi instead of subtracting pi like what we do with sine and cosine?
Is this asking why you added pi?
it has nothing to do with the trig function, you just need all the answer between [0,2pi)
and since tan has a periodicity of pi, you can add and subtract pi to get more valid answers
so in this case we need to add it to get another valid answer in the domain
and in what case do we need to subtract pi?
When you do part b, you will find that there are infinite solutions
you need to only find the ones between 0 and 2pi
1.3... + pi is less than 2pi
but 1.3 - pi is less than 0 so its not valid for this
and 1.3 + 2pi is greater than 2pi so its not valid answer
@hard pawn Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin
2. I have begun but got stuck midway
3. I got an answer but I'm told it's wrong
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked
5. I have a question about someone else's worked solution
6. None of the above
1
i think u should start by simplifiing the fractions
first step would be to sub in your values
to decimals?
no
keep fractions as they are
don't feel the urge to convert everything to decimals
so 2 x (4/5) x (2/7) + root (4/5)(2/7^2)
okay
where?
so 2(4/5) (2/7) + root (4/5)(2/7^2)
$2\br{\frac 45}\br{\frac 27} + \sqrt{\br{\frac 45}\br{\frac 27}^2}$
โamonov
yes
2(4/5) (2/7) + root**((4/5)((2/7)^2))**
missing those bolded () to clearly reprsent that in text
u must put ur answer in a single fraction
$\frac{16}{35} + \frac{4}{7\zqrt{5}}$
โamonov
use $
yes, whether you factored out that 4 is optional
$\frac{4\left(4+\sqrt{5}\right)}{35}$
$\frac{4\left(4+\sqrt{5}\right)}{35}
Arctic
Closed by @fallow oracle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have absolutely no idea where I am going wrong I keep getting 3.66460663 but since i round to two decimals i get 3.37 which is still wrong
are you sure your answer is also in radians
3.664 rounds to 3.66
Apologies i get 3.3664
Im actually so dumb
thank you
np
.close
Closed by @short crater
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
โ
So I got 0.00102548 and I dont know if i just risk it and put 0
and this is my last try on the question
no don't do that
the angle in between them is very small
so it could be correct
but I'll check first
Thank you so much
you can also just visualize the angle to give yourself a sanity check
something like this could never hurt
this is wrong
so what would it be then?
austinu
That one
ok
plug in
and then take arccos
the result is not 0.001
tell me what you got for u dotted with v
and for the magnitudes
austinu
now take arccos of the right hand side to find theta
so arccos=17/sqrt29 times sqrt10?
what
wdym right hand side
^
Oh wait so you want me to put all that into an arccos?
if $$\cos{(\theta)}=\frac{17}{\sqrt{29}\sqrt{10}}$$ Then $$\arccos{\cos{(\theta)}}=\arccos{\frac{17}{\sqrt{29}\sqrt{10}}}$$ Then $$\theta=\arccos{\frac{17}{\sqrt{29}\sqrt{10}}}$$
austinu
note that in all cases arccos(cos(x)) is not necessarily equal to x, but in this case it doesn't matter
Do you understand the difference between degrees and radians?
not really to be completely honest I always thought it was just another way to put degrees in
or vice versa
if you put arccos(whatever) into a calculator in radians mode
then the result will tell you the degree in radians
it doesn't "become" the radians
like that is just the angle
if you wanted to see if your result makes sense
you could confirm that 0.0587... radians is about 3 degrees
and then you can look back to your picture
and be like
yah that's about 3 degrees
Ohhhhhh alrighty that makes alot more sense actually thank you
mhm
.close
Closed by @short crater
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have tried to study the functions my points made, like when they intersected and etc., to maybe combine some expressions to get the value of the parameters (I checked those with Wolfram Alpha again and again, of course).
The problem is, I got an expression for the x value of the inflection point of f(x), and an expression for the intersection point of f(x) and f'(x).
I got a domain of both of them and when I combine them, there is no solution. I am right in both expression, I can see with my eyes that these 2 conditions can co-exist, but somehow the equation says they can't. Where am I wrong?
f(x) = a/(1+be^(-cx+d))
An expression for the x value of the inflection point of f(x): 0.15 โค ln(be^d)/c < 0.2
An expression for the x value of the intersection point of f(x) and f'(x): 0.85 < ln(b * e^d * (c-1))/c < 0.9
f(x): https://imgur.com/a/opSSyLM
integral of f(x): https://imgur.com/a/5Ik7HxB
f'(x): https://imgur.com/a/fSm7ov9
@night forum Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@night forum Has your question been resolved?
can you explain what the problem is again? i cant really understand
you got f(x)=a/(b+e^(-cx+d)) and you have found (somehow) an expression for the inflection and intersection point
Indeed
I will try to explain it
f(x)=a/(b+e^(-cx+d))
The x value of it's inflection point is when f''(x)=0
So I found the second derivative of f(x), made it equal to zero, and got the value of x (which is ln(b*e^d)/c)
Now from the points I have, I can see that the inflection point is between 0.15 (or equal to) and 0.2
Same for the intersection, calcualted the first derivative of f(x), made it equal to f(x), got the value of x, and from the points I can see it's between 0.85 and 0.9
ln(b * e^d * (c-1))/c
Now I can get a range of values for d from both equation:
ln(e^0.15c/b) โค d < ln(e^0.2c/b)
ln(e^0.85c/b(c-1)) < d < ln(e^0.9c/b(c-1))
But there is no value for d that can satisfy both ranges of values
And I can't understand how
from this you conclude that the inflection point is between 0.15 and 0.2?
Not from this
Inflection point of f(x) = Extrema point of f'(x)
This is f'(x)
You can see pretty clearly that there is a minimum point
Maybe it's on 0.15, and it can be after that, but it's before 0.2 for sure
i dont see any 0.15 or 0.2 on the numberline...you do that just by looking at it?
Right because it's really zoomed out, but I have the exact coordinates of every point, so I can check
alright
i dont think this is completely true
if the minimum you are talking about (which i cant see) is at the edge of the interval (or whatever than means for a function that consists only of points) then f'' isnt necessarily defined at that point
and also
Wait I will draw it
Ignore my drawing skills
The extrema can be on this exact point
But it's also can be a little bit after that
Like that
yeah that is an inflation point ok
You mean inflection?
yeah lmao
and also?
what i was going to say is that if f'(x) has a minimum or maximum at the edge of the interval then it isnt an inflection point
but thats not the case so
Oh right
But this is not the case
Do you have any idea why I get this weird situtaion? Of no solutions for d?
I must be wrong somewhere, because there is clearly a solution
so this is 0
considering a,b,c,d arent 0
a=0 and c=0 dont make sense anyway
so as you said x=ln(be^d/c)
so e^0.15<=be^d/c<=e^0.2
They aren't
I can tell you more, all of them are positive except of a which is negative
I can tell by how they change the shape of the function
How you got this?
0.15<=x<=0.2
i dont see how you got this for the intersection point though
I asked wolfram alpha
He said so
I trust him
Try it yourself
Is it?
how do you get the expression for d from this?
yeah it is
I am sorry I have a feeling I am really weak at log rules
Again, wolfram alpha
I wrote
0.85 < expression < 0.9
And it gave it to me
this is =ln(b/(c-1)*e^d)/c so ln(ab)=lna+lnb
Wtf
I don't get it
How
I will trust you that you wrote the same but in different form
But how you got a solution and I didn't?
no idea
but u got 3 variables it s kind of weird if you couldnt just choose some for it to work
let me try to find some values to make it work ig to make sure we got it
Imma do the same
it s the same
Or maybe I am dumb?
i checked
Oh fuck
I wrote the original function I was trying to work with
i was confused too u just multiply up and down with e^2cx
I changed it a little but I didn't write it here
So the function and the range of d don't match in what I wrote
Ok fine
Wait where the range of c came from?
Something during the calculation?
I mean c must be in these intervals or it's just some of the solutions?
it just gives values for when the 2 inequalities are true at the same time
it says we got 3 cases
b>0 1.47<c<1.49 and the restriction of d
So they are true at the same time just in those values of c?
and then the other case for c=1.49...
well yes it seems so
if c is below 1.49759 or above 1.52205 we dont have any solutions
Understandable
Why you wrote b=1 and c=1.48? just as an example?
yes
Ohhh ok
so yeah everything makes sense
Yea
weird problem
You just did some kind of witchcraft and wolfram decided to work
you gotta check if wolfram is doing what you are telling it to do...most times it s pretty easy to realise something is wrong
but for example wolfram may decide that a is dependant on x or something crazy
and then you gotta realise that it s doing that and type the question in an other way
Closed by @flat oracle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone explain to me why 8 isnt correct?
if t is 8
then t + 1 is 9
try drawing a triangle with sides 8, 9, and 17
because thatโs what triangle D would look like if t were 8
have you done this?
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
Good luck in that, a triangle like that doesn't exist
That was the point of my message
@ember geyser Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @ember geyser
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
๐ญ
Could anyone tell me how +infinity works in integrals?
northsteve
lol
these integrals fucking me up in statistics, why they gotta be so hard
U using speed of light in statistics?
c is just a parameter, but wolfram thinks its that
thatโs why there isnโt a solution
if you use a different variable it should show
@steady fossil Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is it really necessary to do all this working just to prove this identity?
since tan is sin/cos, could i just do
(sin/cos)^2 + 1 = (1/cos)^2
therefore tan^2 + 1 = sec^2?
i dont see how the first and second steps are necessary
Sure but you then need to show why (sin/cos)^2 + 1 = (1/cos)^2
Yes you start with sin^2 + cos^2 = 1
the one that says cos^2 + sin^2 = 1
so for the 3rd property, will we also have to use this property to prove it?
why choose the first property to prove this tan property(the one in the ss)?
also, sorry if im asking too many questions
i need to get a solid understanding
Yeah
In a proof you usually start with what is known/assumed to be true
And the fastest way here would be to start from the Pythagorean identity
i see
Cuz you just divide by cos^2 and simplify
wait
in the first step, whyd we only use cos^2 + sin ^2 for the left side, and not the entire first property? (cos^2 + sin ^2 = 1)
is it because the cos and sin are relevant to the equation, and not the 1 from the first property?
Not sure what you mean by that
ok so like
If sin^2(x) + cos^2(x) = 1 can be used
in the first property, the cos and sine squared is equal to 1. so im wondering why we didnt bring back that 1 into the left side. as in, the '1' from the first property isnt used to prove the 2nd property
ill take a look at this
The 1 is still there though, it's just divided by cos^2
a = b -> a/c = b/c (for nonzero c)
sin^2 + cos^2 = 1 -> (sin^2 + cos^2)/cos^2 = (1)/cos^2
wait
so is the 1 in the 3rd step the same '1' from the first property?
If you are talking about the second '1' then yes
The first '1' is just a result of cos^2 cancelling itself out in cos^2/cos^2
OHHH
I get it now
the 1 has been there all along
thank you sir
or ma'am
.close
Closed by @hard pawn
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help
x^3(x-7)(x+7)
A polynomial of the form [
\map f x = a_nx^n + a_{n-1}x^{n-1} + \hdots + a_1 x + a_0 ]
Is said to have degree $n$
@versed fjord Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
โข Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
โข Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
โข After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
โข Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
โข Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #โhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So i calculated the formulas and also resulted in x -5 v x 3 and i also understand the <= sign but i do not understand where the 0 <=x comes from
if the formula is needed to explain do let me know but it's kinda hard time typing it over and i've seen this coming back literally every time
@crimson sedge wait uh do we know f(x) and g(x) or
or what exactly do you need to do
yea
ill send them i guess thats easier for sure
but it's not really related to this question
i'm more needing to understand as to how 0<=x<=3 came to be
i understand the x<=3
but not the 0<=x
well i suppose the 0<=x can only be explained if we have the functions right
like i dont know how to calculate it or whatever how it works i dont knwo what it is at all
ive only worked with x<=3 v x<=-5 kind of format
but one sec
ill send u the formulas
i alreayd got them
great
f(x)=x^3+2x^2-8x
g(x)=7x
i understand i put them like
x^3+2x^2-8x=7x
and then sqrt
x^2+2x-8=7
x^2+2x-15=0
i put them in the abc formula, got -5 and 3
i reckon i see the mistake rn
sqrt so - or +
it's 7 or -7
so -1 or -15
but i still don't really get where the 0 comes from
sqrt?
yea i used that i think
i am told i can just make x disappear everywhere
sqrt (xยณ) is not xยฒ
I suppose in this case it's <= right? instead of =
yes
so that's where the 0<=x from?
because 2 solutions
so solution 1 <= x <= solution 2
uh i'm not entirely sure, i'm doubting myself
Hm okay yeah i've never got teached anything so self taught but this is kinda the problem of it
cause these tiny must know things i dont know
self taught? gl
yea
it's not great idea
but it is what it is
no other options
i do have an exercise book with answers
they do list the steps
but the 0 is nowhere to be found in there either
urgh i wish i had a piece of paper i hate doing stuff in my head
if you have f and g, you can calculate where f is above (so >=) g or vice versa
i'm belgian i can read it dw
oh that's great
uh yea so the 0 <= x <= 3 is the problem
i know now the 0 where it comes from okay
oh you can use the graph?
but i dont understand how the heck it ended up in the answer at that place
yea but i never do that
i dont know how to ๐ญ
u don't know what website to use?
Wdym what website to use
for graphs
oh
can you show me the graph if possible?
ill need to take a pic with phone idk how good that is
i only got the answers online
the book is on paper
dw just try your best it'll be more than fine
the xยณ+2xยฒ-15x = 0 stuff just calculates the places where f=g equals 0
I know how to calculate all the numbers
like the 0 is just a stupid mistake
i couldve known
like finding the numbers is fine
f=g means that on the graph, they cross
the answering format with ...<=x<=... i dont understand
so f<=g means that the y value for g is bigger than the y value for f
look at the functions between x = 0 and x = 3
yea
Yea
it's below
and after 3 it's up
is that how th ey answer the format
0 <= x <= 3
you see that the blue line is under the red, so f<=g
Yes
yeah this means
f(x) is less than or equal to g(x) when x is between 0 and 3
i could write it out better in dutch if it helps for u
Yes
idt it's allowed here
that's much better
okay
sure
dit betekent dat de functie f(x) op de grafiek onder de functie g(x) ligt wanneer x tussen de 0 en 3 ligt
Oke dat snap ik dus maar om op deze manier te beantwoorden heb je de grafiek ook echt nodig
visueel
anders zou je het niet kunnen beantwoorden?
ik denk dat je het zelf kan berekenen ook
of moet je hem anders gewoon tekenen
nee je kan een verschilfunctie opstellen
verschilfunctie is f(x) - g(x)
dus per toeval is dat die xยณ+2xยฒ-15x
snapje?
Ja
Dus vul je 0 in bij y en x?
wacht benje nederlander of belg want het heeft misschien een andere naam
nederlands
je kijkt of de functie negatief is of positief in een tabel
daar heb ik ook nooit iets van gehoord
uhhh ik kan proberen het te tekenen in m'n notes alsje wilt
brb
ik heb wel 5 jaar les gehad in wiskunde
havo diploma gehaald
maar moet nu certificaten vwo wiskunde b halen
heb geen idee wat dit betekent sorry hahaha
dit ding dus
geen probleem
dus je vult de formule op je rekenmachine in bij de table functie
en dan krijg je dit
en met die nummers kan je zien wanneer het boven of onder is
en als die positief is, dan is f(x) > g(x)
en als die negatief is dan is f(x) < g(x)
dus jij had f(x) < g(x) nodig
Ja
dus je kan in die tabel zien dat dat is tussen 0 en 3, en alles onder 5
hoe je dit doet:
- nulwaarden berekenen en die erbij zetten ( de -5, 0 en 3)
- een testwaarde (dus iets dat er tussen ligt, bij 0-3 bijvoorbeeld 1) invullen in de functie
het antwoord geeft aan wanneer f(x)<=g(x) is
ja de <= of de < is gewoon of je de nulwaarden erbij neemt of niet
en dit is wanneer x is tussen 0 en 3 of kleiner is dan -5
ja