#help-13

1 messages · Page 140 of 1

heady mountain
#

ah nvm this is wrong

#

um

#

<@&286206848099549185> (sorry for ping)

cedar kilnBOT
#

@heady mountain Has your question been resolved?

heady mountain
#

.close

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @heady mountain

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

jagged stag
cedar kilnBOT
jagged stag
#

where did the propability of 95% come from'

#

?

muted bear
#

Empirical rule

jagged stag
#

also why is 106.2 rounded up and but not 133.8?

astral bay
#

well it's "a number of students between 106.2 and 133.8"

#

106 and 139 are both not between 106.2 and 133.8

jagged stag
jagged stag
#

.close

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @jagged stag

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

cedar kilnBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

cedar kilnBOT
#

Please don't occupy multiple help channels.

cedar kilnBOT
#

@median plover Has your question been resolved?

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

cedar kilnBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

vital valley
cedar kilnBOT
vital valley
#

It feels like I don't have enough given stuff to plan out masses

cedar kilnBOT
#

@vital valley Has your question been resolved?

vital valley
#

<@&286206848099549185> I gained negative mass while solving this problem, now I can't find my center of gravity

cedar kilnBOT
#

@vital valley Has your question been resolved?

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

lethal sequoia
#

How to derive
a²= b²+c²-2bc cos(A)
b²= a²+c²-2ac cos(B)
c²= a²+b²-2ab cos(C)
Can it derived from single triangle? I checked so many video and they only focused on deriving one side anyone any idea or I'm just dumb

muted bear
#

You do the same construction but focused on a different side

inland ocean
#

Yeah

#

It's a lot wrong

lethal sequoia
hard ember
#

For cosA, draw perpendicular from either B or C. For cosB draw perpendicular from either A or C. And similar for CosC

hard ember
#

Yeah

lethal sequoia
#

What's next step?

#

Next step like this something?

#

,rotate

wraith daggerBOT
cedar kilnBOT
#

@lethal sequoia Has your question been resolved?

lethal sequoia
#

,rotate

wraith daggerBOT
lethal sequoia
#

Is this correct?

analog kelp
#

YES

lethal sequoia
#

Oh

cedar kilnBOT
#

@lethal sequoia Has your question been resolved?

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

heavy mortar
#

.reopen

cedar kilnBOT
#

dire geode
cedar kilnBOT
#

@lethal sequoia Has your question been resolved?

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

cedar kilnBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

storm junco
#

hey just curious what a vector function with multiple variables is called,
im trying to google some stuff about them but cant find the name

tranquil maple
#

dont quote me on it, quite new here but my best guess would be a "vector transform function", but im sure someone will correct me if im wrong

cunning loom
#

Can you be more precise? You might mean a map of sets, or you might want the vector space structure, in which case you mean a linear map.

#

Like which function do you care about

storm junco
short blade
#

it is still a vector valued function

#

the domain has just changed from a 1 dimensional space to 2 dimensional

#

geometrically, it usually defines a surface as opposed to a curve

storm junco
#

Ah ok thats interesting I didn't know that, is there not a name for these specifically though? They're just called vector valued functions?
All I'm trying to do is get search results and learn off of that

crystal raptor
#

are you trying to generalise something like a map from R to R^2 where V(a) = <x(a),y(a)>?

short blade
#

it’s a specific kind of vector valued function

storm junco
storm junco
#

That works out, thanks!

#

.close

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @storm junco

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

agile linden
#

Hi, I tried to solve this problem but I don't understand how to solve it

agile linden
#

these are the tries I did

crimson sedge
crimson sedge
crimson sedge
agile linden
crimson sedge
#

what do you mean

#

you did integration instead of differentiation

#

it's asking for $\pdv{P}{y}$

wraith daggerBOT
#

kenfps

crimson sedge
#

and $\pdv{Q}{x}$

wraith daggerBOT
#

kenfps

agile linden
#

oh, I read that wrong, I thought you meant to intergrate than differetiation

agile linden
#

but it was wrong

crimson sedge
#

Because you are NOT supposed to integrate

agile linden
crimson sedge
#

A vector field $F(x, y)$ is conservative iff $\pdv{P}{y} = \pdv{Q}{x}$

wraith daggerBOT
#

kenfps

crimson sedge
#

Do you agree?

agile linden
#

yes

crimson sedge
#

Then why are you integrating the P component of the vector function?

agile linden
#

I was following the notes I took in class

#

that's why I was a bit confused

agile linden
cedar kilnBOT
#

@agile linden Has your question been resolved?

agile linden
#

<@&286206848099549185>

potent wave
#

Do you know what function is P?

#

For step 2

agile linden
#

I do not

#

I thought it was P because of the equation

#

thats why I chose it

short blade
#

F(x,y) = Pi + Qj

short blade
potent wave
#

Yeay

short blade
#

now in step 2, begin by identifying P and Q

#

and let us know what you think those are

agile linden
short blade
#

F = Pi + Qj

#

what is i being multiplied by

agile linden
short blade
#

and what about in the problem they gave you

#

what is in front of the i

agile linden
#

(2x+5y)

short blade
#

so what would be the logical conclusion

#

what is P

agile linden
#

2x+5y

short blade
#

yea

#

now do you know how to compute a partial derivative?

agile linden
#

I believe so

#

might need a refresher

short blade
#

well what is dP/dy

#

(as in the partial)

agile linden
#

dx/dy

short blade
#

let me ask it again

#

what is $\pdv{P}{y}$

wraith daggerBOT
#

maximofs

short blade
#

given P = 2x + 5y

agile linden
#

2?

short blade
#

no

#

take the derivative with respect to y

#

treating x as a constant

agile linden
#

5

#

well 5y

short blade
#

yes

#

no

agile linden
#

just 5?

short blade
#

just 5

#

what is the derivative of 5x with respect to x

agile linden
#

would that become 5?

short blade
#

yes

#

probably want to get a refresher on derivatives yeah

agile linden
#

yeah it's been awhile

short blade
#

but yeah anyway, we now know the partial of P with respect to y is 5

#

now take the partial of Q with respect to x

agile linden
#

would it become 1?

short blade
#

what is Q

agile linden
#

Oh, are we on a different equation?

short blade
#

no

#

remember F = Pi + Qj

#

we figured out P = 2x + 5y

#

what is Q

agile linden
#

(-5x+12y-4)

short blade
#

yes

#

so take the derivative of that with respect to x

agile linden
#

that why I was wondering if it's a different equation

#

it would be 5

short blade
#

no

agile linden
#

wait no

#

it would be 12

short blade
#

no

agile linden
#

wouldn't we treat y as a constant?

short blade
#

we’re taking the derivative of -5x + 12y - 4

#

with respect to x

agile linden
#

-1/6x^6?

short blade
#

ok let’s take a step back

#

and go to P again

#

because we missed something very slight

#

P is not 2x + 5y

#

P is 2x - 5y

#

so now

#

what is $\pdv{P}{y}$

wraith daggerBOT
#

maximofs

agile linden
#

it's 5

short blade
#

no

#

what is the derivative of -5x with respect to x

agile linden
#

-5

short blade
#

yes

#

so what would dP/dy be

agile linden
#

-5

short blade
#

yes

#

now back to Q

#

Q is -5x + 12y - 4

#

what is dQ/dx

agile linden
#

-5

short blade
#

yes

#

that’s it

agile linden
#

Ooh okay, I need to practice my derivatives more

#

thank you!

#

.close

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @agile linden

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

echo sinew
#

@slate lintel

cedar kilnBOT
echo sinew
#

lemme add the qns here one second hahah

#

i was thinking for time shld i be using displacement?

obsidian coral
echo sinew
slate lintel
#

it's fine in this case

#

we were talking in DMs

echo sinew
#

cus they had to leave due to personal reasons ^^

#

mhm!

slate lintel
#

I think you have the tools you need for this! you had the velocity vector and you can use that to figure out when the ball lands, and then use that to figure out how far it goes

#

(yeah ik it lands 18m in this case but like in general for an angle theta and velocity v)

echo sinew
#

mhm

#

okie lemme try

echo sinew
#

hmmm

slate lintel
#

yeah but i think it wants you to prove it for an arbitrary velocity v first

#

so just vcos / vsin

echo sinew
slate lintel
#

it wants you to prove this first, right?

echo sinew
#

yep

slate lintel
#

that works for any velocity, not just 14 m/s

echo sinew
#

ohh so ur saying i shld use v instead of 14 so that it cld be applicable for any t along the travel?

slate lintel
#

yeeee

#

exactly

echo sinew
#

ahh i see

#

so it wld be <vcosθ,vsinθ>

#

from this do i er get r by integrating what i have here?

echo sinew
slate lintel
#

figure out how long it's in the air

#

like what time does it hit the ground again

echo sinew
#

time hm

slate lintel
#

$p_y = p_0 + v_0t - gt^2$

wraith daggerBOT
#

Hayley

slate lintel
#

because the only vertical acceleration is gravity

echo sinew
slate lintel
#

position

#

i think some books use s for position for some reason

#

so we want to figure out when the y-position is 0 (when it hits the ground)

echo sinew
#

ooh

echo sinew
slate lintel
#

yeah

echo sinew
#

how exactly issit written out tho? like 0 = 0 + 14t - 9.8t^2?

slate lintel
#

yeah we'll get to that but for now just leave it as v and g

echo sinew
#

its not wrong to write it dis way right?

#

ouh

slate lintel
#

well it'd be v sin(theta) because we're talking vertical

echo sinew
#

Oh ya cus when its landing v might be diff

#

but g is always 9.8 right?

slate lintel
#

g is always 9.8 but you can just leave it as g since the target uses g, see it?

echo sinew
#

ooh okie got it!

slate lintel
#

but yes you can put in 0 for the p0 since it starts on the ground

echo sinew
#

oki

#

and py can be 0 too right?

slate lintel
#

yep! because we wanna know when it hits the ground again

echo sinew
#

i got t = v/g

#

i didnt get the v^2 tho its normal right o.0

#

cus i will prob multiple it later with smth else ig

slate lintel
#

did you remember the sin theta?

#

sorry i forgot to put that in there we want to use $v_y$ not just $v$

wraith daggerBOT
#

Hayley

echo sinew
#

oop icic

slate lintel
#

like this thing should say vsinθ*t in the middle

echo sinew
slate lintel
#

we're trying to figure out how long the ball is in the air

#

so we can figure out how far it goes

echo sinew
#

okok

slate lintel
#

bc like there's nothing slowing itt down horizontally

echo sinew
#

mhm

slate lintel
#

so it'll keep going until it hits the ground

echo sinew
#

okie now i got v/g(sinθ) = t

#

Displacement = velocity . time

slate lintel
#

hmm i get $t = \frac{v\sin\theta}{g}$

wraith daggerBOT
#

Hayley

slate lintel
#

or is that what you mean

echo sinew
#

so im guessing i have to us <vcosθ,vsinθ> here smwhere

echo sinew
#

i placed the constants tgt xD

slate lintel
#

yeah so now we figure out how far it goes in the x direction in that time!

echo sinew
#

so its easier to visualise

slate lintel
#

and yeah displacement = velocity * time

echo sinew
#

issit like what we have here times vcosθ?

slate lintel
#

yeah

echo sinew
#

OOOH I understand

#

i got the thing proveddd

#

tysmm!!!!

slate lintel
echo sinew
#

ur really patient lol appreciate ur time & help ^w^

slate lintel
#

okok then the next part is pretty easy just put in the numbers and crank the wheel

echo sinew
#

hhaha i did that first alr lol xD

slate lintel
#

yeah that makes sense haha

echo sinew
#

so i need to rewrite cus the current one is messy

#

AHHA

#

okie imma close the channel so others can use it

#

tysm have a grt day ^w^

#

.close

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @echo sinew

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

safe violet
#

what is the integration of e^-2x

cedar kilnBOT
safe violet
#

I have to do this one

dreamy sleet
safe violet
dreamy sleet
safe violet
dreamy sleet
safe violet
#

@dreamy sleet ??

cedar kilnBOT
#

@safe violet Has your question been resolved?

safe violet
#

<@&286206848099549185>

crimson sedge
safe violet
#

did you say something?

crimson sedge
#

But if you integrate it is -1/2e^(-2x)+C

safe violet
#

so can you check my complete answer?

crimson sedge
#

Ok, here's the issue, with integration by parts, what you have is $\int udv=uv-\int vdu$.\
So it should be:
$\int x^2e^{-2x} dx=x^2(-\frac{1}{2}e^{-2x})-\int-\frac{1}{2}e^{-2x}2x dx$\
Where we've chosen $u=x^2$, $dv=e^{-2x}$ so $du=2x$ and $v=-\frac{1}{2}e^{-2x}$

wraith daggerBOT
#

qingfengmingyue

safe violet
#

damn

crimson sedge
#

You need to apply it twice in total

safe violet
#

oh

#

so I chose v instead of dv

#

hah?

#

dv = e^-2x

#

but I let v = e^-2x

crimson sedge
#

Yes

safe violet
#

let me try one more time

crimson sedge
#

Yes, that looks right to me

safe violet
#

thank you sir

safe violet
#

.close

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @safe violet

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

cedar kilnBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

valid shuttle
#

Hi, i am reading a textbook right now and i dont understand this simplification. Can someone explain it please

valid shuttle
crimson delta
#

the first step is an arithmetic progression

vague rapids
# valid shuttle

This turns into a diophantine equation, solutions of which are written below

valid shuttle
#

The bottom one is the first equation

vague rapids
#

They did the factorization because (not stated but as it seems) a and k both are integers. So you can solve for them easily by factoring

frosty ocean
#

Write all the a's together and the numbers next

vague rapids
#

Since 2000 is to be expressed as product of two terms, we would get a limited cases (here 20)

frosty ocean
#

a+(a+1)+(a+2)+...+(a+k) = (a+a+...+a) +(1+2+3+..k)

#

There are k+1 a's

#

and there is sum up to k natural numbers

#

You can simplify this

vague rapids
#

Also you could think of an A.P.
The given series is an A.P. with first term=a and last term=(a+k) and common difference=1 and there are (k+1) terms
So apply the formula of sum which is (n/2)(a+l)
You would get ((k+1)/2)(a+a+k)

valid shuttle
frosty ocean
#

Where are the dots?

valid shuttle
frosty ocean
#

SImplify further

wraith daggerBOT
valid shuttle
#

Sorry but i dont get it

frosty ocean
#

Repeated addition is multiplication

#

For example, 2+2+2+2 = 4 times 2 = 8

vague rapids
#

from 1 to k there are 'k' numbers and there is one 'a' for every number. Also there is one extra 'a'.
So in total there are k+1 number of 'a's

frosty ocean
#

So what is (a+a+...+a) when there are (k+1) number of terms?

valid shuttle
#

(K+1)*a

frosty ocean
#

Right

#

What is sum up to first k natural numbers?

valid shuttle
#

I dont know

dire geode
dire geode
#

1+2+3+...+k=?

#

Have you learned arithmetic progression sums

valid shuttle
#

Not yet

#

Is this good?

vague rapids
#

yes

frosty ocean
#

This is the AP sum

#

Why did you say "not yet" to riemann's question? thonk

valid shuttle
#

Because we havent learnt it in school yet

frosty ocean
#

To continue from our work

frosty ocean
valid shuttle
#

Is it this formula?

wraith daggerBOT
vague rapids
valid shuttle
#

Okay now i get it thank you guys

#

Just one more thing

valid shuttle
dire geode
cedar kilnBOT
#

@valid shuttle Has your question been resolved?

valid shuttle
#

Thanks for everything guys

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @valid shuttle

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

wanton summit
#

Show that nc0 + nc1 + nc2 + nc3...ncn = 2^n

wanton summit
#

i dont really understand what they did here

tropic oxide
#

they find |P(S)| in two different ways

wanton summit
#

how do they count teh subsets of S

#

in a different way

#

can you explain that to me

tropic oxide
#

there are two ways

#
  1. count nCk for the number of k-element subsets of S, sum for k from 0 to n
  2. two options for each element: either it belongs to the subset or it doesn't => 2 * 2 * ... * 2 [n copies]
#

which one do you want explained

cedar kilnBOT
#

@wanton summit Has your question been resolved?

tropic oxide
#

which one first

wanton summit
#

i dont think they did that

#

2

tropic oxide
#

bruh what

#

see me saying they did this
"i dont think they did that"

#

are you trying to piss me off on purpose here

wanton summit
#

sorry but

#

doesnt that involve sigma notation

tropic oxide
#

sigma notation is just that: notation

#

they wrote it the longhand way

#

it doesnt change the fact that theyre still adding some shit up

wanton summit
#

right

#

could you please explain both

tropic oxide
#

which one first

wanton summit
#

start with 1

tropic oxide
#

k

wanton summit
#

and forgive me but

tropic oxide
#

for any k between 0 and n inclusive, the number of k-element subsets of S is equal to nCk

wanton summit
#

im not familiar with sigma

tropic oxide
#

you dont NEED to be

wanton summit
#

okay im just

#

letting you know

wanton summit
#

yes that makes sense

#

its how we define nck isnt it

#

from n elements choose k

tropic oxide
#

yes thats one of the definitions

#

the possible sizes for a subset of S, which has n elements, are all integers from 0 to n inclusive

#

agree or disagree

wanton summit
#

yes

tropic oxide
#

the number of 0-element subsets is: nC0
the number of 1-element subsets is: nC1
the number of 1-element subsets is: nC2
.........
the number of n-element subsets is: nCn

adding all this up, we get that the count of ALL subsets of S is
nC0 + nC1 + ... + nCn

#

agree or disagree

wanton summit
#

yes

#

by the way can i also think about this as how many ways you can arrange n digits into a number with up to n digits

#

and showing that that is 2^n

#

is that word problem equivalent to this series

tropic oxide
#

no and yours is poorly stated enough that i dont want to touch it

#

dont ask me to either

#

does this explain method #1? yes or no

wanton summit
#

yes

#

but how do they get to 2^n

tropic oxide
#

you misspelled "ok, now on to method 2?"

#

anyway

#

there are n elements in S

#

when constructing a subset of S, for each element you make a binary choice: either it belongs to the subset or it does not

#

agree or disagree

wanton summit
#

yes

#

agree

tropic oxide
#

ok

#

since these choices are independent of each other, we multiply their counts together

#

to get the product of n copies of 2

#

agree or disagree

wanton summit
#

yes thats the multlipication principle

tropic oxide
#

the product of n copies of 2 is 2^n

#

agree or disagree

wanton summit
#

agree

tropic oxide
#

does this explain method #2, yes or no

wanton summit
#

yes

#

you find the number of subsets from 0 to n, add them up

#

deduce that something is either part of it or it isnt

#

and use multlipication principle n times

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

cedar kilnBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

crimson sedge
cedar kilnBOT
crimson sedge
#

How do I know which is a min and which is a max?

vague rapids
#

Mininmum would be smaller than Maximum

vestal bear
#

true

cedar kilnBOT
#

@crimson sedge Has your question been resolved?

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

boreal trail
#

is it jus me or textbooks wrong/wording of q is scuffed

boreal trail
#

if you win the 10% of $20

#

u gain $18 dont u ?

#

and if u win nothing $-2

#

cuz $2 spend

tropic oxide
#

it's the worked solution that is scuffed

boreal trail
#

but when calculating the expected, they only included the -2 when losing, but not 20-2

boreal trail
tropic oxide
#

should be yes

boreal trail
#

k ty

#

.close

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @boreal trail

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

crimson sedge
cedar kilnBOT
crimson sedge
#

How do I know which equation is suitable for the question?

#

I still don’t understand

cedar kilnBOT
#

@crimson sedge Has your question been resolved?

dreamy sleet
#

you can check this by putting y = 3 and seeing if x is real

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

crimson sedge
#

.reopen

cedar kilnBOT
#

dreamy sleet
crimson sedge
#

@dreamy sleet

dreamy sleet
#

the fifth step is wrong

crimson sedge
#

How?

#

@dreamy sleet

dreamy sleet
#

-1 ≠ sqrt(1)

crimson sedge
#

Huh

dreamy sleet
#

because the square root function only gives the positive output

crimson sedge
dreamy sleet
crimson sedge
#

Why, you’re right

dreamy sleet
crimson sedge
dreamy sleet
crimson sedge
#

Idk Im confused

dreamy sleet
#

by the way I think it’s meant to say ”y >= 2” instead of “x >= 2” for part ii

dreamy sleet
dreamy sleet
#

so what is the correct inverse?

crimson sedge
#

Sqrt(x+1)+2

crimson sedge
#

@dreamy sleet

dreamy sleet
crimson sedge
#

So if I want to find the suitable equation I just see if each equation is true for a value in the given domain or range?

#

@dreamy sleet

dreamy sleet
#

you keep pinging me after I don’t reply for a few seconds

#

can you not do that

crimson sedge
#

Oh sorry

crimson sedge
#

All good

#

Thank you

dreamy sleet
#

has your question been resolved?

crimson sedge
#

.close

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @low wadi

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

cedar kilnBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

vapid knoll
#

i got this log question i dont even know where to begin cant see anything

vapid knoll
tropic oxide
#

this looks mistyped

#

is that cube root of 2 meant to be the base of the log?

vapid knoll
#

i wrote it in this machine from my book

#

i dont think so

#

i'll send the original

proven thistle
vapid knoll
proven thistle
#

Naww

#

That's not base lol

vapid knoll
#

🤔

tropic oxide
#

the question is either ugly or just unsolvable

#

either way you should talk to your teacher and clarify

proven thistle
#

Ajax try solving it twice

#

One with ³√2 as base and one without

#

Do you need help in any?

vapid knoll
#

what do you mean without the base?

vapid knoll
proven thistle
#

Put ³√2 as a coefficient of a

#

In 1 case

vapid knoll
#

so i got $log_2^{1/3} {(a)} = b$
and $ log_4 (a^3) = log_{2^2} (a^3)$

#

oop

proven thistle
#

2 power 3/2

wraith daggerBOT
#

ajax4074

vapid knoll
#

you mean
$log_2^{3/2}$ ?

wraith daggerBOT
#

ajax4074

vapid knoll
proven thistle
#

Yes

#

Yes

thick hill
vapid knoll
vapid knoll
vapid knoll
#

oh i see

proven thistle
#

They're doing the Second case

#

But im 100% sure you just need to do case 1

vapid knoll
#

what was that for

proven thistle
#

?

#

You could do it any way lol

vapid knoll
#

im soo lost rn...

cedar kilnBOT
#

@vapid knoll Has your question been resolved?

fallen moat
vapid knoll
#

i got options

fallen moat
#

oh interesting

vapid knoll
#

ugliest is 3b/2

#

4b
2b
b
b/2
3b/2

fallen moat
#

is that log is of base 10 or e?

#

anyways

vapid knoll
#

i suppose its 10

#

cant we figure out what they meant to write depending on the options?

fallen moat
#

with those options, I'm pretty sure it's $\log_{\sqrt[3]2}a=b$

wraith daggerBOT
#

biscuityxd

fallen moat
vapid knoll
fallen moat
vapid knoll
#

i cant see a relation between $\sqrt[3]2}$ and base 4

wraith daggerBOT
#

ajax4074

i cant see a relation between  $\sqrt[3]2}$ and base 4
```Compilation error:```! Extra }, or forgotten $.
l.57 i cant see a relation between  $\sqrt[3]2}
                                               $ and base 4
I've deleted a group-closing symbol because it seems to be
spurious, as in `$x}$'. But perhaps the } is legitimate and
you forgot something else, as in `\hbox{$x}'. In such cases
the way to recover is to insert both the forgotten and the
deleted material, e.g., by typing `I$}'.

Preview: Tightpage -1310720 -1310720 1310720 1310720
[1{/usr/local/texlive/2020/texmf-var/fonts/map/pdftex/updmap/pdftex.map}]```
fallen moat
#

try to use $\log_ba=\frac{\log a}{\log b}$

wraith daggerBOT
#

biscuityxd

vapid knoll
fallen moat
#

do tell if you are still stuck @vapid knoll

vapid knoll
#

so $\log_{\sqrt[3]2}a=\frac{\log_4a}{\log_4\sqrt[3]2}a}$

wraith daggerBOT
#

ajax4074

so $\log_{\sqrt[3]2}a\=\frac{\log_4a}{\log_4\sqrt[3]2}a}$
```Compilation error:```! You can't use a prefix with `\endgroup'.
<to be read again> 
                   \endgroup 
l.57 so $\log_{\sqrt[3]2}a\=\frac
                                 {\log_4a}{\log_4\sqrt[3]2}a}$
I'll pretend you didn't say \long or \outer or \global or \protected.```
vapid knoll
#

what

#

im not even gonna try to edit that shit wait a second

fallen moat
#

lol

vapid knoll
#

consider that 3 up there

fallen moat
#

ok

vapid knoll
#

now i could go on and say this:

#

but is it really necessary

#

nvm if i do say that:

fallen moat
#

nah nah

vapid knoll
fallen moat
vapid knoll
#

how

fallen moat
vapid knoll
#

u mean take its cube or?

fallen moat
wraith daggerBOT
#

biscuityxd

vapid knoll
fallen moat
vapid knoll
#

nah nah ok i see that

vapid knoll
fallen moat
#

use $n\log a=\log a^n$

wraith daggerBOT
#

biscuityxd

vapid knoll
#

oh... right...

#

im so blind ?

fallen moat
#

nah, you're brain stuck only 😛

vapid knoll
fallen moat
vapid knoll
#

ok 1 sec

slate lintel
#

girl r u writing on your floor 😭

fallen moat
#

lol

vapid knoll
#

no this is paper guys

#

wait

fallen moat
vapid knoll
#

but then it gets fucked again excuse my french

fallen moat
#

lol

vapid knoll
#

is that equal to that

#

i bet not

fallen moat
#

log_4 (2) means 2=4^(?)

vapid knoll
#

oh yeah

#

1/2

#

as ^

#

so sqrt

#

i was going by heart

#

it's not taught that way here exactly

#

ok so that's $2 log_4a^3$

wraith daggerBOT
#

ajax4074

vapid knoll
#

if this is b than $log_4 a^3 is b/2$

fallen moat
#

yes

wraith daggerBOT
#

ajax4074

vapid knoll
#

holy shit this took so god damn long

slate lintel
#

use \log btw

vapid knoll
#

thanks for suffering w me

vapid knoll
#

trial /log4

#

trial $/log2$

wraith daggerBOT
#

ajax4074

vapid knoll
#

?

slate lintel
#

$\log_3(x^5)$ vs $log_3(x^5)$

wraith daggerBOT
#

Hayley

vapid knoll
slate lintel
#

it's not slanted and doesn't look like three variables being multiplied together shrug it's a small thing

vapid knoll
#

ooh

vapid knoll
#

nvm thanks @fallen moat

#

also @slate lintel for the contribution...

#

biscuity did you just-

#

lmao

#

ok that's it for today...

#

.close

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @vapid knoll

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

cedar kilnBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

hollow wharf
#

hello

cedar kilnBOT
cedar kilnBOT
#

@hollow wharf Has your question been resolved?

slate lintel
#

draw a quick sketch

#

30° is a special angle that you should know the side length ratios

cedar kilnBOT
#

@hollow wharf Has your question been resolved?

olive gust
#

@hollow wharf

#

to determine the length of each tile needed for the gabled roof we can use some trigonometry heres how we can calculate it
1consider one side of the gabled roof we have a right-angled triangle formed by the slab (base) one side of the roof (height) and the slope of 30°
2Since we know that both sides of the roof have an angle of inclination of 30° this means that both sides are congruent.
3Let's label the length of each tile as x meters
4 using trigonometry we can find out that x = height/sin(30°)
to find the height which is half the width or slab length since it meets in exactly in middle divide 24 m by 2: height = 24/2 = 12 m
now plug these values into our equation: x = (12 m) / sin(30°)
alculate sin(30°) ≈ 0.5 and substitute it back into our equation x ≈ (12 m) / 0.5 x ≈ 24 m
therefore to order tiles for this gabled roof before its structure is finished you will need tiles with a length approximately equal to 24 meters each

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

vapid knoll
#

so...

cedar kilnBOT
vapid knoll
#

oops

#

tried the change of base formula

slate lintel
#

what did you get when you tried the change of base formula?

vapid knoll
#

$/log_2 (7) = /{log_5(7)}\frac{log_5(2)}$

wraith daggerBOT
#

ajax4074
Compile Error! Click the errors reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)

#

toby____

$\log_2(7)=\frac{\log_5(7)}{\log_5(2)}$
vapid knoll
#

yeah then we add the bottom:

#

$\frac{\log_2(7)}{\log_5(7)}=\frac{\log_5(7)}{\log_5(2)\cdot \log_5(7)}$

wraith daggerBOT
#

ajax4074

vapid knoll
#

if they simplify (i dont remember if they can)(they being $log_5(7)$ 's)

wraith daggerBOT
#

ajax4074

vapid knoll
#

then we would get $\frac{1}{\log_52}$

wraith daggerBOT
#

ajax4074

fallen moat
#

yea, and this is the simplified form of a

slate lintel
vapid knoll
slate lintel
#

,tex .log rules

wraith daggerBOT
#

Hayley

slate lintel
#

hmm this one doesn't show but there's a way to simplify it a bit further

vapid knoll
#

yeah the fives go we get 7s and they simplify each other i guess

vapid knoll
slate lintel
#

1 = log5(5)

vapid knoll
#

come on hayley im not that bad...

#

so i need the argument to be 10 that's why im so confused

fallen moat
#

hint2:2*5=10

vapid knoll
#

i was so confused

vapid knoll
#

idk which one you meant but...

fallen moat
vapid knoll
fallen moat
vapid knoll
#

ok great 2*5 =10 it is

vapid knoll
fallen moat
#

i see

fallen moat
vapid knoll
slate lintel
#

oh right you're the one that writes on their desk

vapid knoll
#

where does the 2 go if i multiply it by 5?

slate lintel
#

i'm trying to figure out why you need it to have an argument of 10

vapid knoll
#

im trying to figure out how i dont

slate lintel
#

anyway you have $a = \frac{\log_5(5)}{log_5(2)} = \log_2(5)$

wraith daggerBOT
#

Hayley

fallen moat
#

opps

#

haha, my bad

#

it's 3am, i guess i need to sleep soon

#

thanks @slate lintel

vapid knoll
fallen moat
#

final hint:

vapid knoll
fallen moat
#

$a=\frac1{\log_52} \implies \log_52=\frac1a$

wraith daggerBOT
#

biscuityxd

vapid knoll
#

oh to get 10 i multiplied the argument with 5

#

but that would go in front thus wouldn't give me $\log_510$ but $5\log_52$

wraith daggerBOT
#

ajax4074

vapid knoll
#

Scheiße

#

so the question is now:
how do i get $\log_510$ out of $\log_52 $ which is $\frac1{a}$

wraith daggerBOT
#

ajax4074

vapid knoll
#

i CANT SEE

#

wait

#

do i change the bases

#

again

slate lintel
#

$\log_5(10) \neq \log_5(2)$...

wraith daggerBOT
#

Hayley

vapid knoll
#

ok hayley i need to write it that way thoo?

slate lintel
#

I'm very confused on what you're trying to do

vapid knoll
#

im trying to write $log_510$ as $a$

wraith daggerBOT
#

ajax4074

vapid knoll
#

which we simplified to be $\frac1 \log_5(2)$

wraith daggerBOT
#

ajax4074

vapid knoll
#

are we even capable of changing the argument of a logarithm

vapid knoll
vapid knoll
slate lintel
#

what do you mean write $\log{5}(10)$ ``as'' $a$?

wraith daggerBOT
#

Hayley

vapid knoll
#

isn't that what the question says?

#

it has the same 'question sentence' as the one we did before

vapid knoll
vapid knoll
#

1/(a-1)

#

1/a

#

a-1/a

#

you get the idea...

#

the others are similar as well

#

i cant believe im stuck HERE.

slate lintel
#

ahhh

#

ok um i guess what I would do is now that we have a value for a, try putting it into each of those and do more log rules

#

to see if it results in something equal to $\log_5(10)$

wraith daggerBOT
#

Hayley

slate lintel
#

by the way, in english we'd usually say ``write $\log_5(10)$ in terms of $a$''

wraith daggerBOT
#

Hayley

vapid knoll
#

ooh

#

thanks

vapid knoll
#

well i couldn't get to 10 when it was the base so i changed its form to get it in argument

#

well not 10 but 5

#

let me show it

#

$\log_5(2) = \frac1{\log_2(5)}$

wraith daggerBOT
#

ajax4074

vapid knoll
#

i went back to this this

#

then i tried multiplying the denominator and numerator by 2

slate lintel
#

do it the other way, take your a and plug it into the choices

vapid knoll
#

but then again it doesn't give me 10 but 25

vapid knoll
vapid knoll
wraith daggerBOT
#

ajax4074

slate lintel
#

here's a useful thing: $\frac1{\log_ab} = \log_ba$

wraith daggerBOT
#

Hayley

vapid knoll
vapid knoll
wraith daggerBOT
#

ajax4074

slate lintel
#

👀

vapid knoll
#

so the arguments would be multiplied?

#

5*2 giving me 10

#

so a + 1 ?????????

#

that is not an option...

slate lintel
vapid knoll
#

is this wrong

slate lintel
#

did we say that $a = \log_25$ or $a = \log_52$?

wraith daggerBOT
#

Hayley

vapid knoll
#

biscuity wrote it up there somewhere

slate lintel
vapid knoll
#

duck

vapid knoll
slate lintel
#

no you had the right idea

vapid knoll
#

just the wrong values

vapid knoll
#

,rotate

wraith daggerBOT
slate lintel
#

you saw earlier that $\log_5(2) + 1 = \log_5(10)$, right?

wraith daggerBOT
#

Hayley

vapid knoll
#

yeah...

#

oh so $\frac1{a}+1?$

slate lintel
#

yeah!

wraith daggerBOT
#

ajax4074

vapid knoll
#

ohhhhh thank youu

#

@slate lintel catlove

slate lintel
vapid knoll
#

.close

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @vapid knoll

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

crimson sedge
cedar kilnBOT
crimson sedge
#

I have no clue how to actually solve this

#

I know the scale factors but I don’t get how the scale factors help with solving

long arrow
#

ratio of areas = ... (?)
ratio of volumes = ... (?)

crimson sedge
#

The ratio of areas is a weird decimal

long arrow
#

yes but I mean it's scale factor squared and if it comes to volumes is scale factor cubed, right?

crimson sedge
#

Wait how do I find the ratios of areas?

long arrow
#

just area of the bigger solid divided by area of the smaller solid

#

(or the other way around)

crimson sedge
#

3.3344

#

1,755/3.3344 =526

long arrow
#

3.3344 is the ratio of the areas

#

that's true

#

and now explain what you did

crimson sedge
#

Divided the areas

long arrow
#

yes and then? (2nd line equation)

#

why volume divided by this

crimson sedge
#

Idk

long arrow
#

okay lemme explain

#

so we know that ratio of the areas is equal to scale factor squared

#

let's say scale factor is "k"

#

hence, 3.3344 = k^2, you agree?

crimson sedge
#

Yes

long arrow
#

from here, what's the value of "k"

crimson sedge
#

1.826

long arrow
#

yep

#

what we also know is that ratio of the volumes is equal to scale factor cubed

crimson sedge
#

Oh so

#

Basically then cube 1.826

#

And divide 1,755 by that

#

Thanks

#

.close

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @unborn bolt

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

limber snow
#

Is this good enough?

cedar kilnBOT
mighty drift
#

Unless your teacher asks for that much detail, you don't need that many steps for computations. Doing a few simple steps at once is fine

limber snow
#

ngl i just be worried because sometime my TA deducts marks because the "proof isnt clear"

#

but other then that is it correct?

mighty drift
#

Except

#

The conclusion sentence

limber snow
#

oh

#

whats wrong with it

#

isnt it for all n in N?

mighty drift
#

We have shown that (the sum up to n+1) = (the fraction in n+1), not (the fraction in n) + the cube

#

Because that's the hypothesis, not the conclusion

limber snow
#

ssorry i dont get it

#

wym not the cube

#

i did it

#

(k + 1)^3

mighty drift
#

Look at the way you should write it

#

You should state you indeed successfully arrived at the conclusion, hence proving P(n+1) follows from P(n)

#

Yet you wrote basically P(n), not P(n+1)

limber snow
#

in my conclusion right?

mighty drift
#

Yes

#

Oh

#

I read too fast

#

You did the same at the start

limber snow
#

so thats wrong too?

mighty drift
#

You mistated the goal of the inductive step

limber snow
#

shit i dont rlly get the mistake

#

should i have done

#

k^3 + (k+1)^3 =

#

not

#

1^3 ...... k^3 + (k+1)^3

mighty drift
#

Is this your first proof by induction?

limber snow
#

yes

#

we just started

mighty drift
#

That's a big computation to start with

limber snow
#

wait

#

the assumption

#

one second let me fix n send again

mighty drift
#

Which is the same as the hypothesis, but replacing k by k+1

limber snow
#

like this?

mighty drift
#

Yes

limber snow
#

thanks alot

#

.close

cedar kilnBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @limber snow

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

limber snow
#

Can I get a hint for this one

cedar kilnBOT
limber snow
#

im stuck

solid juniper
#

fermat’s little theorem might be helpful

#

or maybe that will overcomplicate it

limber snow
#

never heard of it before i can look into it if it helps

solid juniper
#

if you’ve never heard of it then you probably can’t use it

limber snow
#

oh yeah true

solid juniper
#

but it would be nice

limber snow
#

so should I

solid juniper
#

snow why are you hmming me so much?

sacred grail
#

flt seems too complicated for this hmmCat

solid juniper
#

it’s not that bad T_T

sacred grail
short blade
#

maybe consider the remainders modulo 5

solid juniper
sacred grail
#

isnt it just -1 + 1 though hmmCat

limber snow
#

9k^+1 -1 ?

sacred grail
#

anyway we seem to be doing it induction way so you should insider the induction hypothesis into your calculation hmmCat

limber snow
#

i did that before
(64(64^k)) + 9k) but got stuck with that aswell so idk

solid juniper
still barn
#

The strategy I would use is to notice that 64-55 = 9 and 55 is a multiple of 5

sacred grail
#

64^k + 9^(k - 1) is divisible by 5, write it as a multiple of 5

limber snow
limber snow
#

so i can rewrite it as 5m where m is an integer

#

right

sacred grail
#

yes

#

then insert that into your calculations

limber snow
#

wait uh

#

which calculation

sacred grail
#

this one

limber snow
#

but its k+1

sacred grail
#

well your next step makes it 64^k and 9^(k-1)

sacred grail
limber snow
#

how

#

i dont see it at all

sacred grail
#

i am talking about this

limber snow
#

yes

sacred grail
#

substituting 64^k + 9^(k-1) = 5m into that would do you a lot of good

limber snow
#

im sorry but im confused right now.

#

how would i even transform my equation into that

#

64^k + 9^k-1

wraith daggerBOT
sacred grail
#

what to do

limber snow
#

ok got it