#help-13
1 messages · Page 140 of 1
@heady mountain Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @heady mountain
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Empirical rule
also why is 106.2 rounded up and but not 133.8?
well it's "a number of students between 106.2 and 133.8"
106 and 139 are both not between 106.2 and 133.8
ohhh thank you
ah i got it now thanks
.close
Closed by @jagged stag
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@median plover Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
It feels like I don't have enough given stuff to plan out masses
@vital valley Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185> I gained negative mass while solving this problem, now I can't find my center of gravity
@vital valley Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How to derive
a²= b²+c²-2bc cos(A)
b²= a²+c²-2ac cos(B)
c²= a²+b²-2ab cos(C)
Can it derived from single triangle? I checked so many video and they only focused on deriving one side anyone any idea or I'm just dumb
yeah
You do the same construction but focused on a different side
it looks a lil wrong tho..
Like?
Wait I will fix jt
For cosA, draw perpendicular from either B or C. For cosB draw perpendicular from either A or C. And similar for CosC
Like this?
Yeah
@lethal sequoia Has your question been resolved?
Is this correct?
YES
Oh
@lethal sequoia Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
why are you reopening this
@lethal sequoia Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hey just curious what a vector function with multiple variables is called,
im trying to google some stuff about them but cant find the name
dont quote me on it, quite new here but my best guess would be a "vector transform function", but im sure someone will correct me if im wrong
usually defines a surface
Can you be more precise? You might mean a map of sets, or you might want the vector space structure, in which case you mean a linear map.
Like which function do you care about
Honestly I'm not sure, I'm reviewing parameterized vector functions and thought what if there were more variables, not sure what it would mean geometrically or what it's goal would be
it is still a vector valued function
the domain has just changed from a 1 dimensional space to 2 dimensional
geometrically, it usually defines a surface as opposed to a curve
Ah ok thats interesting I didn't know that, is there not a name for these specifically though? They're just called vector valued functions?
All I'm trying to do is get search results and learn off of that
are you trying to generalise something like a map from R to R^2 where V(a) = <x(a),y(a)>?
a parametrized surface
it’s a specific kind of vector valued function
Like I said I have no idea, just thought what if there were more variables ^
Oh yep I'm finding stuff for that
That works out, thanks!
.close
Closed by @storm junco
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, I tried to solve this problem but I don't understand how to solve it
you integrated it instead of differentiating
partial derivatives are incorrect
again incorrect partial differentiation
Can you explain it a little more about intergrating it?
what do you mean
you did integration instead of differentiation
it's asking for $\pdv{P}{y}$
kenfps
and $\pdv{Q}{x}$
kenfps
oh, I read that wrong, I thought you meant to intergrate than differetiation
I did this for the equation 2x-5y, which would be x^2-5xy+g(y)
but it was wrong
Because you are NOT supposed to integrate
is differetiation rate of change?
A vector field $F(x, y)$ is conservative iff $\pdv{P}{y} = \pdv{Q}{x}$
kenfps
Do you agree?
yes
Then why are you integrating the P component of the vector function?
Is it possible you can give me an example?
@agile linden Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
F(x,y) = Pi + Qj
read step 1 here
Yeay
now in step 2, begin by identifying P and Q
and let us know what you think those are
wouldn't P be (-5x+12y-4) and Q is (2x-5y)?
by P?
(2x+5y)
2x+5y
dx/dy
maximofs
given P = 2x + 5y
2?
just 5?
would that become 5?
yeah it's been awhile
but yeah anyway, we now know the partial of P with respect to y is 5
now take the partial of Q with respect to x
would it become 1?
what is Q
Oh, are we on a different equation?
(-5x+12y-4)
no
no
wouldn't we treat y as a constant?
-1/6x^6?
ok let’s take a step back
and go to P again
because we missed something very slight
P is not 2x + 5y
P is 2x - 5y
so now
what is $\pdv{P}{y}$
maximofs
it's 5
-5
-5
-5
Closed by @agile linden
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@slate lintel
lemme add the qns here one second hahah
i was thinking for time shld i be using displacement?
Please don't ping specific people
er she was helping me earlier? and i got their permission to cont and ping em btw!
I think you have the tools you need for this! you had the velocity vector and you can use that to figure out when the ball lands, and then use that to figure out how far it goes
(yeah ik it lands 18m in this case but like in general for an angle theta and velocity v)
okay so the velocity vector was <14cosθ,14sinθ>
hmmm
yeah but i think it wants you to prove it for an arbitrary velocity v first
so just vcos / vsin
hmm i dont understand?
it wants you to prove this first, right?
yep
that works for any velocity, not just 14 m/s
mhm
ohh so ur saying i shld use v instead of 14 so that it cld be applicable for any t along the travel?
ahh i see
so it wld be <vcosθ,vsinθ>
from this do i er get r by integrating what i have here?
like the position?
time hm
$p_y = p_0 + v_0t - gt^2$
Hayley
because the only vertical acceleration is gravity
ouh
may i know what p stands for here?
position
i think some books use s for position for some reason
so we want to figure out when the y-position is 0 (when it hits the ground)
ooh
so this is like py = 0 when its on ground right
yeah
how exactly issit written out tho? like 0 = 0 + 14t - 9.8t^2?
yeah we'll get to that but for now just leave it as v and g
well it'd be v sin(theta) because we're talking vertical
g is always 9.8 but you can just leave it as g since the target uses g, see it?
ooh okie got it!
but yes you can put in 0 for the p0 since it starts on the ground
yep! because we wanna know when it hits the ground again
i got t = v/g
i didnt get the v^2 tho its normal right o.0
cus i will prob multiple it later with smth else ig
did you remember the sin theta?
sorry i forgot to put that in there we want to use $v_y$ not just $v$
Hayley
like this thing should say vsinθ*t in the middle
hm btw why are we doing dis im a bit confused
we're trying to figure out how long the ball is in the air
so we can figure out how far it goes
okok
bc like there's nothing slowing itt down horizontally
mhm
so it'll keep going until it hits the ground
hmm i get $t = \frac{v\sin\theta}{g}$
Hayley
or is that what you mean
so im guessing i have to us <vcosθ,vsinθ> here smwhere
yeah so now we figure out how far it goes in the x direction in that time!
so its easier to visualise
and yeah displacement = velocity * time
issit like what we have here times vcosθ?
yeah

ur really patient lol appreciate ur time & help ^w^
okok then the next part is pretty easy just put in the numbers and crank the wheel
hhaha i did that first alr lol xD
yeah that makes sense haha
so i need to rewrite cus the current one is messy
AHHA
okie imma close the channel so others can use it
tysm have a grt day ^w^
.close
Closed by @echo sinew
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what is the integration of e^-2x
I have to do this one
You can use integration by parts
for that one also?
You can use integration by parts here
For this one, you can use the integral of e^x
Yeah for that I need to know what is the integral of e^-2x
@dreamy sleet ??
@safe violet Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
It is 1/(-2)e^(-2x)
#help-13 message
isn't this?
did you say something?
If you diff, it becomes -2e^(-2x) and idk where the c is from..
But if you integrate it is -1/2e^(-2x)+C
ok I confused myself on it
so can you check my complete answer?
Ok, here's the issue, with integration by parts, what you have is $\int udv=uv-\int vdu$.\
So it should be:
$\int x^2e^{-2x} dx=x^2(-\frac{1}{2}e^{-2x})-\int-\frac{1}{2}e^{-2x}2x dx$\
Where we've chosen $u=x^2$, $dv=e^{-2x}$ so $du=2x$ and $v=-\frac{1}{2}e^{-2x}$
qingfengmingyue
Yes, for the first time you apply it
You need to apply it twice in total
Yes
Yes, that looks right to me
thank you sir
.close
Closed by @safe violet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, i am reading a textbook right now and i dont understand this simplification. Can someone explain it please
the first step is an arithmetic progression
This turns into a diophantine equation, solutions of which are written below
The bottom one is the first equation
They did the factorization because (not stated but as it seems) a and k both are integers. So you can solve for them easily by factoring
Write all the a's together and the numbers next
Since 2000 is to be expressed as product of two terms, we would get a limited cases (here 20)
a+(a+1)+(a+2)+...+(a+k) = (a+a+...+a) +(1+2+3+..k)
There are k+1 a's
and there is sum up to k natural numbers
You can simplify this
Also you could think of an A.P.
The given series is an A.P. with first term=a and last term=(a+k) and common difference=1 and there are (k+1) terms
So apply the formula of sum which is (n/2)(a+l)
You would get ((k+1)/2)(a+a+k)
Where are the dots?
Sorry but i dont get it
from 1 to k there are 'k' numbers and there is one 'a' for every number. Also there is one extra 'a'.
So in total there are k+1 number of 'a's
So what is (a+a+...+a) when there are (k+1) number of terms?
(K+1)*a
I dont know
Which part don't you know
.
yes
Because we havent learnt it in school yet
To continue from our work
= (k(k+1))/2
yes
.
Where does this formula come from?
You prove it with induction
@valid shuttle Has your question been resolved?
Thanks for everything guys
Closed by @valid shuttle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Show that nc0 + nc1 + nc2 + nc3...ncn = 2^n
they find |P(S)| in two different ways
how do they count teh subsets of S
in a different way
can you explain that to me
there are two ways
- count nCk for the number of k-element subsets of S, sum for k from 0 to n
- two options for each element: either it belongs to the subset or it doesn't => 2 * 2 * ... * 2 [n copies]
which one do you want explained
@wanton summit Has your question been resolved?
both
wait no not the sum one
which one first
bruh what
see me saying they did this
"i dont think they did that"
are you trying to piss me off on purpose here
sigma notation is just that: notation
they wrote it the longhand way
it doesnt change the fact that theyre still adding some shit up
which one first
start with 1
k
and forgive me but
for any k between 0 and n inclusive, the number of k-element subsets of S is equal to nCk
im not familiar with sigma
you dont NEED to be
do you agree or disagree
yes thats one of the definitions
the possible sizes for a subset of S, which has n elements, are all integers from 0 to n inclusive
agree or disagree
yes
the number of 0-element subsets is: nC0
the number of 1-element subsets is: nC1
the number of 1-element subsets is: nC2
.........
the number of n-element subsets is: nCn
adding all this up, we get that the count of ALL subsets of S is
nC0 + nC1 + ... + nCn
agree or disagree
yes
by the way can i also think about this as how many ways you can arrange n digits into a number with up to n digits
and showing that that is 2^n
is that word problem equivalent to this series
no and yours is poorly stated enough that i dont want to touch it
dont ask me to either
does this explain method #1? yes or no
you misspelled "ok, now on to method 2?"
anyway
there are n elements in S
when constructing a subset of S, for each element you make a binary choice: either it belongs to the subset or it does not
agree or disagree
ok
since these choices are independent of each other, we multiply their counts together
to get the product of n copies of 2
agree or disagree
yes thats the multlipication principle
agree
does this explain method #2, yes or no
yes
you find the number of subsets from 0 to n, add them up
deduce that something is either part of it or it isnt
and use multlipication principle n times
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I know which is a min and which is a max?
Mininmum would be smaller than Maximum
true
@crimson sedge Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is it jus me or textbooks wrong/wording of q is scuffed
if you win the 10% of $20
u gain $18 dont u ?
and if u win nothing $-2
cuz $2 spend
it's the worked solution that is scuffed
but when calculating the expected, they only included the -2 when losing, but not 20-2
should be yes
Closed by @boreal trail
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I know which equation is suitable for the question?
I still don’t understand
@crimson sedge Has your question been resolved?
is y = -sqrt(x + 1) + 2 suitable?
you can check this by putting y = 3 and seeing if x is real
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
X=0 then
Can you show your working
@dreamy sleet
the fifth step is wrong
-1 ≠ sqrt(1)
Huh
because the square root function only gives the positive output
So then how would I solve it properly?
Can you rewrite your working?
Why, you’re right
Can you solve this for y = 3?
No?
Why not
this is right
by the way I think it’s meant to say ”y >= 2” instead of “x >= 2” for part ii
so with that in mind, can -sqrt(x + 1) + 2 ever output 3?
No
so what is the correct inverse?
Sqrt(x+1)+2
So this is for y<=2?
@dreamy sleet
yes
So if I want to find the suitable equation I just see if each equation is true for a value in the given domain or range?
@dreamy sleet
Oh sorry
not sure what that means
has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @low wadi
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i got this log question i dont even know where to begin cant see anything
Let us assume
🤔
the question is either ugly or just unsolvable
either way you should talk to your teacher and clarify
Ajax try solving it twice
One with ³√2 as base and one without
Do you need help in any?
what do you mean without the base?
here
all right
so i got $log_2^{1/3} {(a)} = b$
and $ log_4 (a^3) = log_{2^2} (a^3)$
oop
2 power 3/2
ajax4074
you mean
$log_2^{3/2}$ ?
ajax4074
by this:
i got 3/2 (log a-log2 )
-log2 ?
wait not that
im soo lost rn...
@vapid knoll Has your question been resolved?
the answer would be pretty ugly
still stuck?
well how ugly are we talking..?
i got options
oh interesting
i suppose its 10
cant we figure out what they meant to write depending on the options?
with those options, I'm pretty sure it's $\log_{\sqrt[3]2}a=b$
biscuityxd
instead of that
how do you see that?
because with the original one, the answer is way uglier than these answers
i cant see a relation between $\sqrt[3]2}$ and base 4
ajax4074
i cant see a relation between $\sqrt[3]2}$ and base 4
```Compilation error:```! Extra }, or forgotten $.
l.57 i cant see a relation between $\sqrt[3]2}
$ and base 4
I've deleted a group-closing symbol because it seems to be
spurious, as in `$x}$'. But perhaps the } is legitimate and
you forgot something else, as in `\hbox{$x}'. In such cases
the way to recover is to insert both the forgotten and the
deleted material, e.g., by typing `I$}'.
Preview: Tightpage -1310720 -1310720 1310720 1310720
[1{/usr/local/texlive/2020/texmf-var/fonts/map/pdftex/updmap/pdftex.map}]```
and if it's this, one of the answers is correct
try to use $\log_ba=\frac{\log a}{\log b}$
biscuityxd
intriguing...
do tell if you are still stuck @vapid knoll
so $\log_{\sqrt[3]2}a=\frac{\log_4a}{\log_4\sqrt[3]2}a}$
ajax4074
so $\log_{\sqrt[3]2}a\=\frac{\log_4a}{\log_4\sqrt[3]2}a}$
```Compilation error:```! You can't use a prefix with `\endgroup'.
<to be read again>
\endgroup
l.57 so $\log_{\sqrt[3]2}a\=\frac
{\log_4a}{\log_4\sqrt[3]2}a}$
I'll pretend you didn't say \long or \outer or \global or \protected.```
lol
ok
now i could go on and say this:
but is it really necessary
nvm if i do say that:
nah nah
where
the second step is incorrect
how
try mutliplying the numerator and denominator by 3
u mean take its cube or?
$\log_ba=\frac{\log a}{\log b}≠\log a-\log b$
biscuityxd
whaat
you ask how
but i dont see how multiplying by 3 would help
use $n\log a=\log a^n$
biscuityxd
nah, you're brain stuck only 😛
oop a got lost there
use this
girl r u writing on your floor 😭
lol
looks good
lol
log_4 (2) means 2=4^(?)
oh yeah
1/2
as ^
so sqrt
i was going by heart
it's not taught that way here exactly
ok so that's $2 log_4a^3$
ajax4074
if this is b than $log_4 a^3 is b/2$
yes
ajax4074
holy shit this took so god damn long
use \log btw
thanks for suffering w me
ajax4074
?
$\log_3(x^5)$ vs $log_3(x^5)$
Hayley
what's the difference?
it's not slanted and doesn't look like three variables being multiplied together
it's a small thing
ooh
looks like i actually am blind now...
nvm thanks @fallen moat
also @slate lintel for the contribution...
biscuity did you just-
lmao
ok that's it for today...
.close
Closed by @vapid knoll
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello
@hollow wharf Has your question been resolved?
draw a quick sketch
30° is a special angle that you should know the side length ratios
@hollow wharf Has your question been resolved?
@hollow wharf
to determine the length of each tile needed for the gabled roof we can use some trigonometry heres how we can calculate it
1consider one side of the gabled roof we have a right-angled triangle formed by the slab (base) one side of the roof (height) and the slope of 30°
2Since we know that both sides of the roof have an angle of inclination of 30° this means that both sides are congruent.
3Let's label the length of each tile as x meters
4 using trigonometry we can find out that x = height/sin(30°)
to find the height which is half the width or slab length since it meets in exactly in middle divide 24 m by 2: height = 24/2 = 12 m
now plug these values into our equation: x = (12 m) / sin(30°)
alculate sin(30°) ≈ 0.5 and substitute it back into our equation x ≈ (12 m) / 0.5 x ≈ 24 m
therefore to order tiles for this gabled roof before its structure is finished you will need tiles with a length approximately equal to 24 meters each
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
so...
what did you get when you tried the change of base formula?
$/log_2 (7) = /{log_5(7)}\frac{log_5(2)}$
ajax4074
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
toby____
$\log_2(7)=\frac{\log_5(7)}{\log_5(2)}$
great thanks
yeah then we add the bottom:
$\frac{\log_2(7)}{\log_5(7)}=\frac{\log_5(7)}{\log_5(2)\cdot \log_5(7)}$
ajax4074
if they simplify (i dont remember if they can)(they being $log_5(7)$ 's)
ajax4074
then we would get $\frac{1}{\log_52}$
ajax4074
yea, and this is the simplified form of a
log5(7) is just a number so yes you can divide top and bottom by it
oh we CAN simplify??
ok great
,tex .log rules
Hayley
hmm this one doesn't show but there's a way to simplify it a bit further
yeah the fives go we get 7s and they simplify each other i guess
but this didnt help
1 = log5(5)
yeah right right
come on hayley im not that bad...
so i need the argument to be 10 that's why im so confused
hint2:2*5=10
i was so confused
hint3: (log_5 (5))/(log_5 (5))=1
use all 3 hints on this.
this is wrong btw
ok great 2*5 =10 it is
yeah that's why i said that
i see
use all 3 hints on this
and i am trying to
oh right you're the one that writes on their desk
floor if you will
where does the 2 go if i multiply it by 5?
i'm trying to figure out why you need it to have an argument of 10
im trying to figure out how i dont
anyway you have $a = \frac{\log_5(5)}{log_5(2)} = \log_2(5)$
Hayley
go sleep sir
final hint:
yeah i see
$a=\frac1{\log_52} \implies \log_52=\frac1a$
biscuityxd
i get 1/5a which is wrong
oh to get 10 i multiplied the argument with 5
but that would go in front thus wouldn't give me $\log_510$ but $5\log_52$
ajax4074
Scheiße
so the question is now:
how do i get $\log_510$ out of $\log_52 $ which is $\frac1{a}$
ajax4074
$\log_5(10) \neq \log_5(2)$...
Hayley
I'm very confused on what you're trying to do
im trying to write $log_510$ as $a$
ajax4074
which we simplified to be $\frac1 \log_5(2)$
ajax4074
are we even capable of changing the argument of a logarithm
could i explain or is it still confusing
shit this is wrong
what do you mean write $\log{5}(10)$ ``as'' $a$?
Hayley
isn't that what the question says?
it has the same 'question sentence' as the one we did before
oop i didnt write it there previously...
well maybe the options of the question will help you understand
1/(a-1)
1/a
a-1/a
you get the idea...
the others are similar as well
i cant believe im stuck HERE.
ahhh
ok um i guess what I would do is now that we have a value for a, try putting it into each of those and do more log rules
to see if it results in something equal to $\log_5(10)$
Hayley
by the way, in english we'd usually say ``write $\log_5(10)$ in terms of $a$''
Hayley
but i tried that already?
well i couldn't get to 10 when it was the base so i changed its form to get it in argument
well not 10 but 5
let me show it
$\log_5(2) = \frac1{\log_2(5)}$
ajax4074
do it the other way, take your a and plug it into the choices
but then again it doesn't give me 10 but 25
ooh that's what you meant...
well when i do that i have to do $\frac1{\frac1{log_5(2)}-1}$
ajax4074
here's a useful thing: $\frac1{\log_ab} = \log_ba$
Hayley
now that i think about this
what if i added $\log_5(5)$ to this
ajax4074
👀
so the arguments would be multiplied?
5*2 giving me 10
so a + 1 ?????????
that is not an option...

is this wrong
did we say that $a = \log_25$ or $a = \log_52$?
Hayley
ok we'll go your way ...
no you had the right idea
just the wrong values
this option is so close that im starting to develop trust issues with myself rn
,rotate
you saw earlier that $\log_5(2) + 1 = \log_5(10)$, right?
Hayley
yeah!
ajax4074

.close
Closed by @vapid knoll
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have no clue how to actually solve this
I know the scale factors but I don’t get how the scale factors help with solving
ratio of areas = ... (?)
ratio of volumes = ... (?)
The ratio of areas is a weird decimal
yes but I mean it's scale factor squared and if it comes to volumes is scale factor cubed, right?
Wait how do I find the ratios of areas?
just area of the bigger solid divided by area of the smaller solid
(or the other way around)
Divided the areas
Idk
okay lemme explain
so we know that ratio of the areas is equal to scale factor squared
let's say scale factor is "k"
hence, 3.3344 = k^2, you agree?
Yes
from here, what's the value of "k"
1.826
Closed by @unborn bolt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is this good enough?
Unless your teacher asks for that much detail, you don't need that many steps for computations. Doing a few simple steps at once is fine
ngl i just be worried because sometime my TA deducts marks because the "proof isnt clear"
but other then that is it correct?
We have shown that (the sum up to n+1) = (the fraction in n+1), not (the fraction in n) + the cube
Because that's the hypothesis, not the conclusion
Look at the way you should write it
You should state you indeed successfully arrived at the conclusion, hence proving P(n+1) follows from P(n)
Yet you wrote basically P(n), not P(n+1)
in my conclusion right?
so thats wrong too?
You mistated the goal of the inductive step
shit i dont rlly get the mistake
should i have done
k^3 + (k+1)^3 =
not
1^3 ...... k^3 + (k+1)^3
Is this your first proof by induction?
That's a big computation to start with
You should state what you want to arrive at
Which is the same as the hypothesis, but replacing k by k+1
So that you get this
Yes
Closed by @limber snow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can I get a hint for this one
im stuck
never heard of it before i can look into it if it helps
if you’ve never heard of it then you probably can’t use it
oh yeah true
but it would be nice
so should I
snow why are you hmming me so much?
flt seems too complicated for this 
it’s not that bad T_T
you should consider using the induction hypothesis
maybe consider the remainders modulo 5
you can reduce 64 and 9 mod 5 then just check n=1,2,3,4 or something by flt
isnt it just -1 + 1 though 
9k^+1 -1 ?
anyway we seem to be doing it induction way so you should insider the induction hypothesis into your calculation 
i did that before
(64(64^k)) + 9k) but got stuck with that aswell so idk
ok you got me there
The strategy I would use is to notice that 64-55 = 9 and 55 is a multiple of 5
64^k + 9^(k - 1) is divisible by 5, write it as a multiple of 5
wait where did u get 55 from doe
alr
so i can rewrite it as 5m where m is an integer
right
but its k+1
well your next step makes it 64^k and 9^(k-1)
64^k + 9^(k-1) = 5m
wait what
how
i dont see it at all
yes
substituting 64^k + 9^(k-1) = 5m into that would do you a lot of good
im sorry but im confused right now.
how would i even transform my equation into that
64^k + 9^k-1
what to do
ok got it


