#help-13
1 messages · Page 130 of 1
uhhhh
okay so hold on
f(x) = a + 2b arccos(x)
isnt the domain of this unambiguously [-1,1]
Closed by @vagrant elbow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
need help with law of sines no. 5-7
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin
2. I have begun but got stuck midway
3. I got an answer but I'm told it's wrong
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked
5. I have a question about someone else's worked solution
6. None of the above
1
According to the law of sines, $\frac{BC}{\sin{\angle{BAC}}} = \frac{AB}{\sin{\angle{ACB}}}$, right?
A Lonely Bean
Ah, you are stuck at 5th too?
yeah
What's the sum of angles in a triangle generally?
arent they suppose to sum total of 180degree?
Yes, do you think that helps us solve for the angle ACB?
That is a problem when considering the triangle ABD
But when you consider the triangle ABC
Then you have 2 known angles and 1 unknown angle which sum up to 180
Meaning you can solve for that unknown angle, namely, the angle ACB
48 + 55 + ACB = 180
ACB = 77, right?
isnt theres a 2 unknown angle C and D?
We will get to angle D later
yes thats corrrect
Another thing is that the angles ACB and BCD should add up to 180 as well, so BCD is supposed to be of measure 107
Which is the answer to no.5
uhm i dont think i was able to comprehend
This?
yes
ACB and BCD are complementary angles here, right?
yeah
So they should add up to 180
ACB + BCD = 180
We already know the measure of ACB, it is 73
73 + BCD = 180
BCD = 180 - 73
BCD = 107
theres also no 107 in the choices
Ah, ACB is 77 instead, not 73
oh
ohh wow okay i understand now
Moving onto no.6
In order to solve for BC, we need to apply the law of sines in the triangle ABC, which yields [ \frac{BC}{\sin{\angle{BAC}}} = \frac{AB}{\sin{\angle{ACB}}}]
Right?
A Lonely Bean
yeah
We know the values of AB, BAC and ACB
So, why not solve for BC using that equation
Can you do that?
uh i'll try
uhm is this the formula for BC?
Yes, we can solve for BC starting with that equation
Make sure to plug in the known values and then isolate BC
might take me more than 5minutes huhu wait
Shouldn't be too hard
i cant im lost again😭
Alright, let us start by plugging some values in
That yields $\frac{BC}{\sin{48}} = \frac{18}{\sin{77}}$
A Lonely Bean
Now, we need to isolate BC by getting rid of that sin(48) on the left hand side
Which can be done by multiplying both sides by sin(48)
Finally getting us the answer for $BC$: $BC = 18\cdot\frac{\sin48}{\sin77}$
A Lonely Bean
wait uh how did it become BC/sin48? isnt its like all of angle BAC?
We can't manually calculate the values of sin(48) and sin(77),
(Well, we rather are not expected to do that*)
So we put that expression into a calculator
BAC = 48, so BC/sin(BAC) = BC/sin(48)
Similar thing happened on the right hand side, ACB = 77, so AB/sin(ACB) = AB/sin(77)
We also know that AB = 18, so that turns into 18/sin(77)
Ultimately, we get this
is sin48 from angle A? because thats where im kinda confused
Yes, it's coming from the value of angle A
,w calculate 18 * sin(48)/sin(77)
Yes
Now, moving onto no.7
Let us apply the law of sines once again, but instead in the triangle BCD this time
It yields $\frac{\sin\angle{D}}{BC} = \frac{\sin\angle{BCD}}{BD}$, right?
A Lonely Bean
is angle D still unknown or have we already solved it that i just dont notice?
No, D is still unknown and we are on the way to solving it
oh wait uh i think i'll try this one
Alright
uh is BD still uknown?
BD is given as 25
uhm i think theres something wrong with my equation
im not sure how to proceed now
is there something im doing wrong?
Should be 13.7 instead of 17.3
the sum i got?
This, yeah
so like arcsin 0.5339
Yes
the closest answer in the choices is 32degree16'
uh is this right?
what is the 16' for in the choices?
Yup, matches up
Closed by @sullen quest
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Got a question,
ABCD is a Kite
A = (-2,10)
B = (-27/5, 4)
C = (4, -5)
AB = AD
CB=CD
find coordination of D
So I tried
setting BC = AD
do not drop the parentheses from a coordinate specification
and find intersection
do you know distance formula
Can you show all your steps?
And by the way, always write a point’s coordinates as (for example) (-2, 10), not -2, 10
ok gotcha
did you swap them?
you can send it first
I am redoing it, because it is wayyyy too messy
It’s all around the place
Sorry
oh
I think I got where I went wrong
I forgot to squareroot
On finding AD
I skipped a step ahead at the end
I set them equal together and got rid of the sqrt
Nvm I got it
n.close
close
n’éclose
.close
Closed by @pastel sonnet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey, I'm 8th grade and need help with this structured question, it's really the whole thing because I don't really understand squat. So please if anyone willing to help me with this please help
Y and t?
do you mean Y and x axis?
so x = 50 right
yes
would y be 120?
no
💀
100 ?
draw a line up from where x=50
how'd you get 120
ok hold on
yes
where does it intersect the curve
roughly 196
and then you subtract that from 200
to get the number of students stil taking the test
how did you know it was 196 ?
indeed
Yes
holy it was that easy?
so guys how do I solve the medium?
do i add everything up and divide it by 2
no
at what time have half the students (100) solved the problem
i.e. where does y=100?
33 minutes
yes?
o
Draw a horizontal line crossing the spot where 100 is on the y-axis
ok 🫡
yeah 33 mins
33 minutes 🫡
yep
wait that's the answer ?
yep
oh waw am stupid
that”s when half the students have solved
So how do I solve probability?
random took at most = 28 minutes
what number of students had solved by 28 mins
hm is there a way to show this in step wise manner ?
no
its just increments of 4
and the closest is 64
so 64/200 = 8/25 is your probability
da?
last time I did this I tryhard but got 0
ez
just subtract f(10) from f(20)
alright hold on,
how
ok w h a t 😶
let me break this down
x = 20
ok brb when i get it
y would be
27?
no
x is the midpoint, not time
?
what
about 34ish
sorry didn't look at the table
so f(20) is 34
do u want me to find for f(10)?
yes
ay before you go would it be 15.5 x 22 ?
oh he gone gone Don't worry depreeestri.
I will solve this and make u happy
@graceful ether Has your question been resolved?
f(50)
f(40)
f(50) = 196
f(40) = 160
f(50) - f(40)
196 - 160 = 46
@graceful ether Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @graceful ether
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
If a particle collides with a wall and has coefficient of restitution e, do you multiply the initial velocity of said particle by the coefficient of restitution (e) in order to find the rebound velocity?
I understand that coefficient of restitution = velocity of separation / velocity of approach
Wait if it’s a wall then it’s constant
So e x velocity of approach = velocity of separation
Ah okay that make sense
Okay so if
The particle is moving
And it collided with another particle moving
And you knew the initial velocity of both
Then let’s say they coalise
Wait then the velocity of separation = 0
So there is no coefficient ah that makes sense
Okay well what if the two particles do not coalesce
So both particles collide while moving
You’d have to know more information than the initial velocities of both
So let’s simplify the e equation
So it’s (v2-v1) / (v1-v2)
Oh rightttt
No you don’t need more information
Because you can form an equation using momentum
As the momentum before = momentum after using vectors
Giving you an equation for both velocity of 1 and 2 after
Then you can form an equation using e
As you know the initial veclotieis
*velocities
This setting up a simultaneous equation
So all you need is the coefficient of restitution and the initial velocities
Wait but that only applies if e = 1 as otherwise surely there would be a loss to the objects
So the momentum’s are not consistent
Apparently that is not true
So it works
.close
Closed by @median burrow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I keep getting 148 for this
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
But im not sure what im doing wrong
I mean do Z^X first
Then W*Z
Then just carry through with the answers from that left to right
basically I did 5 * 3-3 = 12^2= 144+4= 148
What on earth
This is how I did it
You're reading it wrong
Tbh I don't blame you, questions like these shouldn't exist - they test more on your reading skills than actual math
(w * z) - (z^x) + y
@clear gyro Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I evaluated these sets correctly, right?
yeah
Closed by @dull oxide
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I am currently working on a little project that involves real world coordinates and its giving me some issues as I am not very good with math. I am attempting to draw a circle of points with radius r around a given coordinate with latitude and longitude. To do this I have found two formulas online, one that helps produce evenly spaced points on a circle:
(xk,yk)=(x0+rcos(2kπ/n),y0+rsin(2kπ/n))for k=0 to n−1. (pasted from the internet so styling is a little off)
The other formula is to basically add meters to a coordinate:
latitude + (dy / r_earth) * (180 / pi) for latitude and: longitude + (dx / r_earth) * (180 / pi) / cos(latitude * pi/180) for longitude
where r_earth is the approximate radius of the earth (I.e. 6378137) and dx/dy are the distance want to shift the point.
The way I have currently combined them is as follows.
y = origin.Y + ((radius / r_earth) * (180/ π)) * sin(2kπ / n)
and
x = origin.X + ((radius / r_earth) * (180 / π) / cos(origin.Y * π / 180)) * cos(2kπ / n)
where origin x/y are the center point and radius is in meters.
This is very close to working, but the result is always an oval instead of a circle as show in the attached image. I have checked and the latitude seems to be the correct distance away from my center point according to google maps so I am assuming something is going wrong in the longitude calculation but I do not know what.
What am I doing wrong here and how do I correctly adjust for the curvature of the earth in a calculation like this?
@white radish Has your question been resolved?
I'm not 💯 % sure about whether this is the problem, but the Earth isn't perfectly spherical. If you didn't account for this in your calculations then it might be stretching the circle by some factor along an axis.
nah it's almost perfectly spherical, so it doesn't explain that amount of stretching
yeah it's a small area
I would assume it has to do with the fact that coordinates don't equal the same amount of meters depending on how far along the x axis you are, right? But from what I gathered, the / cos(latitude * pi/180) part of the longitude formula was meant to account for that.
What programming language are you doing this in?
yeah it is
C#, but I didn't copy past my current code into the original question so as to keep it purely math. Here is what the actual code looks like. Ignore the return statement, I'm just attempting to have it print the correct values first.
My guess, and this is just a guess, is that because you're doing so many degrees-to-radians conversions, somewhere you're not multiplying it correctly idk
also the order the factors are arranged is a little weird
Thanks for the insight. I'll go make sure that everything is happening correctly and in the correct order as well. I'll just leave this open while I do it.
How so?
Like the straightforward way I would imagine computing it would be:
angle = 2 pi k / n
dx = r cos(angle), dy = r sin(angle)
point.x = latitude + (dy / r_earth) * (180 / pi)
point.y = longitude + (dx / r_earth) * (180 / pi) / cos(latitude * pi/180)
also there's a slight small angle approximation here for some reason
it's supposed to be arcsin(dy/r_earth)
but that doesn't change too much
Could you explain what an angle approximation is?
small angle approximation means that one takes sin(theta) = theta for small angles theta
And what is theta in that instance (I'm not english by birth so I used different like names for stuff in highschool trig haha).
$\theta$
Saccharine
Saccharine
I guess this is a first-order approximation anyway so it doesn't matter
Oh right so you're saying it doesn't make much sense to even do the sin since the angle is so small?
the proper way to go about it is considerably more annoying
actually wait no it's exact
it's not supposed to be arcsin(theta)
because you're actually talking about traveling the great-circle distance
in any case, it doesn't matter
but yeah try computing the intermediate quantities like I listed and see if any of them don't make sense
the formulae look mostly correct
Yeah I'm on it in the mean time. Haven't discovered anything yet but I'll keep on it.
One weird thing I'm noticing that, to me, indicates I'm doing it wrong is when I completely remove the / Math.Cos(origin.Y * Math.PI / 180) part from the x/longitude calculation the only thing that actually changes in my output is that the oval becomes slightly less tall even though that part should be adjusting the width, right?
North is up.
yeah I can't see all of your code or understand how it works, so that would be strange
but there's also a possibility that you've just changed the zoom level; the division by Math.cos is supposed to make the thing fatter
I'm a little confused. It is possible that the tool I'm using might be interfering with results here. I'm using this website the check the polygon I've drawn: https://www.keene.edu/campus/maps/tool/ but for some reason requires coordinates to be written latitude, longitude instead of longitude, latitude. When I input the results of my function as x, y (longitude, latitude) it does result in a circle, but not in the correct location on earth (it doesn't recognize the location at all) while if I input the results as y,x it does display it at the right location but as an oval.
latitude, longitude is the standard way of writing it
isn't that what your code is supposed to print too?
Yeah that's why I'm printing it that way.
Really, why does google maps do it the other way around then?
Oh shit
I think I fixed it.
I changed from the first to the second.
the tool asks for longitude, latitude
I thought Y is latitude?
You're right... How come when I changed the two around then it was all the way off near afrika?
I clearly made some base level mistakes here in x/y long/lat which messed it up.
not sure, but you probably transposed the two somewhere wrong
I suggest renaming variables to latitude/longitude instead of x/y
because x/y doesn't actually make a whole lot of sense on a sphere
Yeah, that would probably make it clearer. I'm also just going the document the shit out of this so no one else makes my mistakes xD.
Thanks so much for your help!
I'm glad I got this cleared up. Been working on it all day.
Haha
In particular, these lines are fairly bugged in that your circle is rotated if you think of "y" as north
In my mind Y is the same as latitude. So that would be correct, would it not? The higher Y is the further up from the equator, right?
If that's the case, then this code makes no sense, because the first line computes the longitude of the point
Yeah, that's why the cos was on the X first haha. So I guess that assumption of mine is wrong actually. I think I should just play around some more and print the values until I'm 100% on which value is actually what.
I spent some time reproducing the correct code before I went to paste it in the tool and saw the order was different
import math
def compute_points():
r_earth = 6371 * 1000
n = 50
r = 100
start_latitude, start_longitude = 42.92541974089839, -72.28108600708926
for k in range(n+1):
angle = 2*math.pi*k / n
dx = r * math.cos(angle)
dy = r * math.sin(angle)
lat = start_latitude + (dy / r_earth) * (180 / math.pi)
lng = start_longitude + (dx / r_earth) * (180 / math.pi) / math.cos(start_latitude * math.pi/180)
print(f"{lng}, {lat}")
compute_points()
your problem is that the variable names in your code (at least if you use y to represent latitude, x to represent longitude) indicate that you're printing latitude, longitude
but you've changed the code around so what you're really printing is longitude, latitude
and there's the whole rotational symmetry of the circle
and somehow you've made all of the mistakes cancel out
the tool requires you to print the stuff out in longitude, latitude format
Hahaha, leave it to me to make so many mistakes that it comes full circle and is almost right again.
That's actually crazy btw because origin is from a geospatial library and it stores its long/lat as x/y so it is also doing it wrong like me haha.
It's really common in a lot of code, because if you want to reuse some vector libraries or whatever, you're stuck with that
but would highly not recommend confusing yourself with stuff like that
Yeah I'll remember this for sure. I aint ever making this mistake again haha.
Hey I'm just going to brush this up a little and then quit working on it for the day, but thanks so much for your help again! I wouldn't have figured it out alone. This has been great :).
good luck
.close
Closed by @white radish
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How Do I solve the system of equations to find the critical points?
im stuck on the algebra
🐸
You can multiply them both together to get $25sin(x)cos(x)sin(y)cos(y) = 0$ which is equivilent to $sin(2x)sin(2y) = 0$
That might help getting solutions
WeAreIngram
@inland gust does that look right?
also -pi/2 since the range is from -pi to pi
im also confused on how to match them up to find actual (x , y) pairs
Look good
You could manually check them all 🙃
Closed by @eternal knot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@tall mica Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@tall mica Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
What's your question
this is "the" question
dont know how to use the hint abt the Fourier coeffs of sin^2
@tall mica Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have no idea how to start this
do you understand what information the problem gave you?
Yes
you might want to start labeling sides with the lengths they gave you
i'm trying to get a nice picture on geogebra, you can give it a try yourself: https://www.geogebra.org/m/aY75dEkf
Thx
so some triangles you can draw now include LAB, LHD, and LEH
they might help you find some side length relationships
since ultimately you want an expression for AL:LD
there's more triangles you can make which may be useful, but i haven't solved this yet
i'm guessing it's just spamming the pythagorean theorem and using similar triangles
I still can't see anything
keep playing around with the different triangles you can make: there are more than the three i suggested
yeah i'm struggling with this too, maybe see if anyone else can help
i think the side lengths all have to be (1+r)(1+s)(1+t) though
i'll let you know if i figure it out later
👍
@glossy shoal Has your question been resolved?
@glossy shoal Has your question been resolved?
@glossy shoal Has your question been resolved?
@glossy shoal Has your question been resolved?
@glossy shoal Has your question been resolved?
is this proving?
you better start by writing out the equations
$$ \frac{AI}{IB} = \frac{1}{r} $$ $$ \frac{DJ}{JH} = \frac{1}{s} $$ $$ \frac{FK}{KG} = \frac{1}{t} $$
The synthetic solutions seems difficult, it seems best to place the cube on the 3D cartesian plane and find the equation of the plane in terms of x,y,z,r,s,t and find where it intersects AD
Bring Back Beatrix
and you know if you draw a line from K to perpendicular to BC, you know that for example name this point K_1, then BK_1:K_1C=FK:KG
but wait
since it uses r, s and t
you could write this
$$ \frac{IB}{AI} = r $$ $$ \frac{JH}{DJ} = s $$ $$ \frac{KG}{FK} = t $$
Bring Back Beatrix
then its just a matter of substitution
you just reverse engineer the equation
fuck latex
ms word equation is much better
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Does anybody know how to solve this? It's database task, but someone maybe know it? It says "Find keys: relation"
there's a cs server in #old-network
still here ?
Yep
have you tried anything or not ?
c determines d
yeah alright
could you draw the graph of dependencies in this relation ?
at least it's gonna be visual it's more fun
yeah p much indeed
I'll say the cycle has shocked me a little at first lol
so now I guess the thing you forgot is, what does it mean to be a key from the dependencies ?
I also forgot tbh had to look it up
HAHAHAHAHA
bro honestly i don't know really, im watching indians on yt
it's explained so bad in school presentation so im pretty much hopeless without any help
I mean the idea behind a key, is that you can identify which tuple you have only knowing the key right
aight
i.e. if you know the key, you can deduce all the other attributes in the relation
yea i get that
(the key can have multiple attributes inside of it btw)
now let's have fun with the graph a little bit
if we suppose we know AB, can we deduce all the other attributes from that ?
yeah you can know C cause AB->C
and since C->D and we know C we know D
so we won
AB is a key
we're not finished tho
there could be other possible sets of attributes which are also keys
hmm
have fun with this cycle mate
exactly lol
that cycle thing makes it fun lol
nah it's ok
let's see that thing
maybe, i dont know how to translate it correctly
exactly yea
so we have written here, that:
we look left side of arrows
so we look b, e, c ,d
and we check is the letter part of a) B, b) D...
you get me?ž
am i doing it right
yea
from there we try to see if there's dependencies we can apply
for example B -> DE is usable here
now we know new stuff
yea right
we know B D and E
etc..
and you continue this process until your state doesn't grow anymore
the final state is your answer
so for a) would answer be BDE or should i continue procces
can you apply some rules knowing B D and E ?
yea ok, so first step is to see left side of B -> DE, E -> C.. so i look for first letter, which are B, E and others
then i check if B is part of Bf
B is part of Bf
and then i check if there is DE there, if there is not, i add DE
that's written in my presentation, so i HOPE it's right
sounds about right yeah
Oh, so i can add C also, because E -> C, then i can add A, couse C -> A and finally add B couse D -> B
?
yeah exactly
so it's pretty much all the letters? :)
you can do the others, i can check if you want
imma do b) D, and then i'll need your help with d) AC couse i don't know with 2 letters
so with D, it's all numbers again, because D -> B, B->DE, E -> C, C->A
So ABCDE, right?
yeah
<3
you have D->(a key) so you can deduce everything
yup
thank you bro you are savior
really thanks for explaining me in 20mins which this guy couldn't in his 2000 words document
yup sorry for that xd hope you do well bro wish you best
good luck with your exam ig
.close
Closed by @dawn junco
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm not sure what to do or where to start solving...
I first did 18 + 4.50 : 4
And I didn't know what to do from there and that's probably wrong 😅
do (18 + 4.5) / 4 = 15 : 8 so it would be 8 x (18 + 4.5 ) = 15 x 4
good luck :)
ok so let weeks be x
so 4.5x
it would be 8 x (18 + 4.5x) = 15 x 4x
then yu have 144 + 36 x = 60x
then you have 60x - 36x = 144
24x = 144
x = 6
you get it? xd
I'm trying to understand how u got that answer by trying to do it myself with ur guidance - might take some time
.close
Closed by @mint moth
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
The question circled in green and pink,
how would you go about solving it?
It’s 1 mark so it should only take a minute according to exams but I’m not too sure how 500 is the answer.
just look at the recursive definition straight in the eyes
Sorry?
it relates very closely to the sum you have
that's a cute problem
funny indeed
@hasty dagger you need to substitute
certain given information
as one does in math
Alright, thank you!
Another, question, how would you resolve the problem? Currently written the forces but not sure how to find speed, would you calculate GPE loss and then KE gain?
@hasty dagger Has your question been resolved?
that's how I'd do it yeah
Closed by @hasty dagger
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I am stuck in a
hm?
So, i am stuck in a
You're missing a lot of information
Read what you sent again and see if anyone besides you can understand
what i meant
was that i am stuck in finding out the solution to A or 5x-35
Sorry again!
can u send a picture of the question
how to?
use your phone
sign into discord on your phone
or email the picture to yourself, that's a trick I've always used
as a what
product of two or more terms
So, do you know what product means?
yes
Do you see any product there?
i do not think so
what does 5x means to you?
x+x+x+x+x
isn't that the definition of product?
or 4x+1x
yes
i think we just need to factor the term
which product is inside 35?
7x5
5
do you know how to factor out?
no
read this carefully
a * b + a * c = a(b+c)
a * b - a * c = a(b-c)
What do you have?
first or second?
second
write everything replacing with your numbers
5x35-5x7=5x(35-7)
that's not what you have
you have 5x + 35
we agreed 5x = 5 * x
and we agreed 35 = 5 *7
also, never use "x" as multiply symbol
use asterisc *
ok
?
535 - 57=5x(35-7)
leave a space between asteriscs
5 * 35 - 5 * 7=5x(35-7)
ok but read the exercise
The second thing you typed is correct
- 35 is equal to - 5 * 7
but the first thing is 5x
5x is NOT equal to 5 * 35
5x is equal to 5 * x
x is a number you don't know
it's not a symbol
5 * x - 57=5x(35-7)
i guess you meant 5 * x - 5 * 7
sorry
this
but after the equal you are wrong
this is incorrect
remember what I wrote
a * b - a * c = a(b-c)
Tell me who is "a", who is "b", and who is "c" in your exercise
a=5 b=x c=7
5(x-7)
that's correct
when you put a parenthesis after a number, you don't need to use multiply symbol, it's there even if you don't put
so that's it
now you do it with part b
find what's in common
and do the same
that's close
-2m(6n-1)
perfect
Closed by @mighty topaz
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can somoene please tell me if i have done this problem correctly ? my prof gave us examples to do but didnt give us an answer key.. here is the problem: https://preview.redd.it/z4gkgu5lx25b1.png?width=1640&format=png&auto=webp&v=enabled&s=eec1cd94d5f8df0cb8ec5b23a1c0bea851844ecb
and this is what ive got so far: https://flic.kr/p/2oGcy4s
looks right to me. I don't think you needed to actually do the computation, but that can help to prove that it is indeed what you think it should be (dollars per month)
Closed by @pallid ether
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Are both x's and angles equal?
They have the same name...
I have used the name to signify
I can redraw it with different names
is alpha = beta
and x = y ?
do x and y represent the lengths?
then yes
Is this the reason why we can say that 120 = 90 + 30
Therefore, use 30 degrees
In calculations?
Yes they are necessarily equal sorry
(with appropriate sign of course)
you can show the triangles are the same via ASA (one of them is a right angle)
well you don't really use
30 because of 120=90+30
Beta represents 180° + alpha actually
the angle marked is congruent to alpha
Yeah it does, and I removed the 180 degrees part for the very reason to ask if they are the same
So to check whether that's why they are used
Congruent?
They are the same
ALright xd
the use of references/related acute angles simplifies the values in the problem making it easier to evaluate
congruent triangles, vertical angles, angle sums
@dense basalt from your example you can say that sin(alpha + 180°) = -sin(alpha) and cos(alpha + 180°) = -cos(alpha)
Again, that doesn't "prove" what I asked
This does
I suppose
Thank you very much!
.close
Closed by @dense basalt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm confused why different expressions are returned?
Please read #❓how-to-get-help
my guess is that those are equivalent based on the (implicit) definition of y(x) but I haven't checked
what do you get if you multiply the numerator of the first one by $x^2(y^2+2y-1)$, which equals 1?
kitten.in.a.teacup
Closed by @viral mural
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi can someone help me with an easy thing please
I have (x+1)(x-2)<0 (inequalities and stuff)
And the answer is -1<x<2
Can someone explain it to me?
It's a multiplication between 2 factors
Idk why the x is bigger
Than the -1
Because i separate the two parentheses
And i have x<-1 and x<2
positive × positive = positive
positive × negative = negative
negative × positive = negative
negative × negative = positive
But the answer says that the x is bigger than the -1
i'd recommend sketching the parabola and marking where it crosses the x-axis
(x + 1)(x - 2) is negative, so we have to see the bold cases
Ye ik but you only have to substrate or add the 1 in the two sides right?
Oh fuck
YOU'RE A GENIUS MAN
lol
But wouldn't be there
Two possible answers?
If a is positive and b negative
And viceversa
Let's try to solve it first
Let's start with positive × negative = negative
Which means that (x + 1) is?
Yeah u right
But you get it?
x + 1 < 0
x < -1
And
x - 2 > 0
x > 2
But x can't be less than -1 and greater than 2
Second case is invalid
No problem lol
Yeah I understand now
