#help-13
1 messages · Page 39 of 1
man you are exposing
No need to bother about such things
Just tell already
i am very tensed for exam bcuz in last semester i got degraded performance in math
can you help me out?
Yes
any tips?
Go and study properly
Solve more and more questions
Don't panic
Be calm
Think logically
That's it
drink water and sleep 8h
i am not able to solve questions ine exam but when i take a look at paper at home and i can solve them!
what?
don't study new topics
that's 80% of the work
Your heartbeat normal when you give exam?
20% is you putting that work in
"dont panic" sometimes doesnt just work, so i would recommend you meditating for 5 mins before the exam
Wether u will pass fail score good marks etc.
just close your eyes and try to focus as much on your breath as possible
what exam is it
also do mock tests
like University or school?
breath slowly and calmly for 2 mins when you start to panic
if school
math
okay
school
And drink water too
🙂
plenty?
Yes
is there a square for 28?
How much you feel like drinking
root?
not like 2*2=4 like this
root 28 = 5.29150262213
,tex 28² ?
haygiya
nope
bruh
,tex \sqrt{28} ?
got it
:sadge:
woman
ye
im also a man
and non binary
and ask pronouns
thanos basically
i have all the crystals
if i become good at math can i also become a helper here?
Yes boi you can even become now
joined yesterday
im not good in math so i wont help out people lol
im kinda good at latex thats why i help people out
how can i learn latex?
.close
Closed by @undone sage
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
idk i just started typing and learned it
.reopen
lol
maybe try ,help if you want to learn faster
i dont know a thing
type whatever you want to type between $ symbols
i am currently preparing for exam... i will learn latex in june
$hi$
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
haygiya
cuz f(x) = f(-x)
aint 6 supposed to be even
cuz f(x) = f(-x)
looks like it
so the answer key is wrong?
yeah
though it might also be a typo in the question, because there are two constant terms
maybe it should be -5x, in which case the answer would be right
Closed by @short dome
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
why did they add that term below
isn't Γ (p+u+1) enough to desribe whats in the denomenator up there
There's no reason for the product to stop at 1+mu
so we want it to stop at 1
so we multiplied then devided by Γ(u+1)
if thats right than that equality isn't correct
wait i'll write what i understood
wait no
it did stop at 1+mu
Mehdi_Moulati
i don't understand the bounds
we didn't learn gamma function using the product so im not very familiar with it
(p+u)! = (p+u) * (p-1+u) * (p-2 + u) * ...* 3 * 2 * 1
wouldn't it only end to 1 if we add u!
but you made a mistake in the numerator
i forgot the first term
Mehdi_Moulati
yes
this is what we got
so in order to write (p+u)! as Γ(p+ u+1)
it must end at 1
yeah , Γ(p+ u+1) is the product of numbers from 1 to p+u
anytime
.close
Closed by @lavish jolt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
given these
are the vectors orthagonal, also is the family ortonormal
A set of vectors S is orthonormal if every vector in S has magnitude 1 and the set of vectors are mutually orthogonal.?
and i just realized that is is orthogonal, so disregard that question.
my book, says that it is orthonormal if the set of vectors are orthogonal with regards to the inner product and consists of unity vectors with regards to the inner product
Well what are their magnitudes
Closed by @autumn notch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
With the usual dot product this is just the standard formula for length of a vector
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I.e. sqrt(sum of squares of entries)
Closed by @crimson delta
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
need help idk
I think the question is incomplete
Find the direction and magnitude of... What exactly
u + v... maybe?
of the vector maybe
wat it needs
I think your teacher forgot to put down the resultant vector lol
Lol
yeah i'm sure it's resultant vector
I mean your teacher's gotta specify the resultant vector
It could be u+v, v-u, u-v, 2u + 627272v
Etc etc
Use parallelogram law
$|{R}|=\sqrt{A²+B²+2AB cos\theta}$
Arnab Pal
@abstract abyss Has your question been resolved?
Put the values in
y i need the equation here
isn't it pythagoras theorem
You need equation to find v+u
Nah
Pythagoras theorem was a²+b²=c²
$|{R}|=\sqrt{A²+B²+2AB cos\theta}$
Arnab Pal
wat u got there is the law of cosines
$C=\sqrt{A²+B²-2AB cosC°}$
Arnab Pal
Law of cosine is this
so wat equation is here
i need to know the point so i can work it out again
The parallelogram rule says that if we place two vectors so they have the same initial point, and then complete the vectors into a parallelogram, then the sum of the vectors is the directed diagonal that starts at the same point as the vectors.
You should watch it
Duration of the video is 2 min
alright
This video explains how to use the parallelogram method to find the resultant sum of two vectors. You need to be familiar with law of cosines formula in order to make this work.
You could also watch this
You would know everything about parallelogram law
That you need to know
it's got the magnitude but not the length 😦
What length?
Yupp
To make the thing easy
You could use triangle law
I have to go for dinner
Ask anyone else for help
ok eat well
@abstract abyss Has your question been resolved?
Should watch this derivation
Wait
,w √(6²+10²+2×6×10×cos(50))
Ok
Law of sine is
$\frac{sin (a°)}{a}=\frac{sin (b°)}{b}=\frac{sin (c°)}{c}$
Arnab Pal
This is law of sine
Yeah you could use law of cosine for angles
No no no
You couldn't use exterior angles
You have to use int angles
i wanna know y it's 15 and 130 degrees and 6 and 50 degrees
oh ok
but the side is fine
but y is the 130 degrees not the angle of b or c idk
You know what I was thinking
wat
In your question v=6 and u=10
yeah
And in this question one side is 1 and the other is 6
maybe it's a 10 just mistake
bro y is sinA/a = sin130/15
Yeah
If you use parallelogram law you will end up with same ans
You have to assume it in your mind
but i don't know
If you take a side then you have to take opposite angle
cause corresponding angles
Not really
all i needed to know ty
Yeah
i'm just a bit confused here as well
to inverse it
and 6/5(sin130) isn't 18 degrees anyway
ah ok
,w sin^-1(6/5×sin130°)
yeah and my teacher said it's 18 wat
Wait
see ugh
Result in radian
wat is he on
nah bro radian is -0.372
not 18 again
wat
Everybody makes mistakes
18 is right
i don't know wat i need to inverse it for
You need to inverse it for theta
Like suppose
x=6/15×sin 130°
AND
um 6/15
$c=\theta$
Arnab Pal
yes
Here
And if you want to take out the c
so you have to move the sin to the RHS
RHS = right hand side
When you will do that
alright so x/c
No no you don't have to move the c
c = sin/x sry
You have to move sin
x/sin
Not sin/x
Yeah but we don't write sine function like this
We use ^-1
For sin
Or any other Trigonometric functions
So
$sin^{-1}(x)$
Arnab Pal
Inverse Trigonometry is another level of thing
right so to got sin u just need to divide by theta
You got inverse sin you got theta
And you don't need anything else
Yeah
Maybe
But not more than "her"
so true my friend
🥲
ty so much bye
.close
Closed by @abstract abyss
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey, so I had more of a quick question. This isn't specifically to this picture but whenever a set is defined like this I don't really get why it's written in this format. Could someone explain it?
Another example would be
A = {x | x is every positive integer}
don't really get the x | x
part
What does all x mean?
its a placeholder variable
here its an element of either A or B
np
.close
Closed by @zenith fiber
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i need to solve this differential equation with substitution, i feel like i’ve solved it properly but my answer is wrong, i can’t spot my error, can someone please help? i’m lost and exhausted
initial conditions are y(0)=1
p.s. i know it’s seperable but the question asks to solve it with substitution
elalem nelerle ugrasiyo allahim
@royal river Has your question been resolved?
eyv.
@royal river Has your question been resolved?
@royal river Has your question been resolved?
@royal river Has your question been resolved?
what's the equation ?
Hello, do you have the correct answer?
nope
Oh I wanted to check my answer, nvm
Substitution method to solve differential equations is what you do in i). Then in ii) you don't have to just use substitution all the time, that's substitution for solving integrals which is not what they mean
Well that's what I think
Otherwise the solution is too tedious, sorry I couldn't follow it 😵💫
@royal river Has your question been resolved?
yes, i end up with an annoying integral so i have to do lots of u substitutions, but i’m still using substitution to solve the differential equation
I forgot to add that the integral in the fifth line can be solve by partial fractions
I've already checked my answer with wolfram alpha 🤔
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
It's asking me to find the value of x for which i have the min and max of the function
If i do the derivative of the function i find x > -24 as
yet when my teacher does the same he finds x < -24
why is that?
can you show your work?
Be careful, as the derivative of |(x+3)(x-4)| has discontinuity points
x= -3 and x= +4?
There are three cases you need to distinguish:
x < -3
-3 < x < 4
4 < x
Okay, how should i do so?
This is the answer i got from my teacher, i don't understand what he does either
so, by intuition, since f(x) >= 0, the only minimums you can ever hope to find are f(x) = 0
since f(x) = g(x) for x>4 and x<-3, (and f(x) = -g(x) for -3<x<4), you study g(x) instead
since g(-3) = 0 = g(4), those are the only global minimums you can find
I see, now its much more clear thank you
finally, since g'(-24) = 0, -24 is either a local minimum or maximum of g
so in any case, it's gonna be a local maximum for f
Closed by @tulip river
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can i show someone in vocal a few analysis 1 exercises i made for training? there's some tricky stuff my teacher put i think i didn't get right
i have a laptop im using to write exercises on with my pen that's y i'd rather screenshare than send the pics here
to give context it's about the convergence of some series, continuity and derivability
and a limit that i have to do with either taylor or de l'Hopital
im in the 384kbps channel waiting if anyone is up
<@&286206848099549185>
also one thing i just found out is can't screenshare in any voice channel so if u could help me with that tho that'd be awesome
italian real analysis (that's y i wanted to do voice call)
♡LexQa♡
i only use log 
yeah i think we can just use L'H
actually you dont need the >0
[ a \textqq{text} b ]
[ a \textQQ{text} b ]
[ a \textlq{text} b ]
[ a \textqr{text} b ]
.close
Closed by @low wagon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.


(i swear snow wasnt talking to herself)

Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Directional derivatives - In understand the entire initial solution for the first example, but in the second example, where and why do you need the unit vector in the direction of A
Like in this example, we do not use the unit vector
Anytime
.close
Closed by @raven sandal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
please can I get some help finishing this proof?
Max..
so suppose m and n are odd?
Your next step is then correct but from there I think there is an easier route.
Our goal is to show both m and n are multiples of 3. Which contradicts that the gcd(m,n)=1
Can you show that m is a multiple of 3?
Something using this?
or something like: m has to be a multiple of 3 because of the factor 3^x
something like this^?
@toxic flame Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone explain to me how the 5 disappeared in the first line and where did the +1 come from in the second line
Closed by @grim lantern
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, if $n \geqslant 2$ integer, $f: [1, + \infty[ \mapsto \mathbb{R}$ such as $f_n (x) = x^n - x - 1$; $a_n$ is the solution to $f_n(x) = 0$; what is the limit of $(a_n)_{n}$ ?
approach infinity
Max..
yeah ik that
and yea as n approaches infinity
Probably useful to note that $a_n^n = a_n + 1$
ΣAC
really, how so?
yes
Why is it true?
lilisworld
Or why is it useful? (I don't know)
why is it useful
No idea, but it's the only info you have about an
i also know that $(a_n)_n$ is a decreasing sequnce srry i forgot
lilisworld
Well then it's almost certain the limit is 1
whyy
Your sequence is decreasing and bounded below by 1
A good guess is 1
Happens to be correct
ok so a_n is never 1 for sure
so it's not the min(a_n)
@crystal raptor could u give me a hint
<@&286206848099549185>
.
how do i do that
No idea, give it a try
There can be multiple solutions to f_n(x)=0
yes and now we need to prova that these solutions are never smaller than 1 
no wait
of course it is but why 1 and not 1.2 for example that's my problem
Domain of fn is restricted
i dont get it 
<@&286206848099549185>
in order to find the solution of x^n - x - 1 = 0 when n is very big;
that slution is bigger than 1
not bigger than 1.61...
1 < a_n <= 1.61
<@&286206848099549185>
<@&286206848099549185>
@marble ermine Has your question been resolved?
@crystal raptor what's the link with this: a_n ^n = a_n + 1 ??
@marble ermine Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
when i have vectors v,w and metric tensor G, does the metric tensor also applies while calculating the norm such that:
$$\langle\vec{v}|\vec{v}\rangle=\vec{v}^TG\vec{v}$$
marejak023
.close
Closed by @oblique lynx
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How would I calculate the cartesian equation of a plane through the point (2,3,1), when the plane is equidistant/the same distance from the 3 points (1,3,5) (1,1,1) and (3,1,3)?
@steady fossil Has your question been resolved?
Do you know vectors at all?
If the plane is equidistant from 3 points, then the plane is parallel to the plane described by those 3 points
ah, I get it now ty
it means they have the same direction vector right @dull oxide ?
the two planes?
ye
@steady fossil Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @steady fossil
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
When we want the Taylor expansion of $\ln(1 + \frac{1}{x})$, we can substitute $u = \frac{1}{x}$, then take the Taylor expansion of $\ln(1 + u) = u - u²/2 + u³/3 - ...$ and substitute back $\frac{1}{x}$.
Why are we allowed to do that? We are taking derivatives to get the Taylor expansion, and
$f(x) = \frac{1}{x} + \frac{1}{x^2} = u + u^2$ for $u = \frac{1}{x}$, then $f'(x) = 1 + 2u = 1 + \frac{2}{x}$, but that is not correct
It's the Taylor expansion at a = 0, so the Maclaurin series
There is no Maclaurin series for that, yes, there are Taylor series for it though, where a is not equal to 0
then why are you saying a = 0
For ln(1 + u) = u - u²/2 + u³/3 - ..., that is the Maclaurin series, so the Taylor expansion at a = 0
By substituting 1/x = u, we can get the Taylor series of ln(1 + 1/x) at a = infinity, but my question is, why is that allowed?
$f(x) = \frac{1}{x} + \frac{1}{x^2} = u + u^2$ for $u = \frac{1}{x}$, then $f'(x) = 1 + 2u = 1 + \frac{2}{x}$, but that is not correct
When finding the Maclaurin series of ln(1 + u), we are taking derivatives too
And substituting back in the end is still valid, but why?
it should read f'(u) not f'(x)
the expansions for these functions are usually unique
so you can find them in whatever fashion you'd like
you're guaranteed by uniqueness to get the same result
Closed by @sand cradle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
The first step is to understand your function f and g
Okay
given here is f and g as a set of ordered pairs
where the ordered pair (a,b) can be viewed as an input, output pair
so, if you want to evaluate f(18), by definition of the function it's f(18)=-12
because (18,-12) is an element of the set f
Right
so when you have an inverse function by definition, you have the output of the function f and you are tracing back to it's input
i'm wording it in a way that it gives intuition first
or say f(18)=-12
f^-1(12) means, for what output of f does the input is 12
so clearly we can refer the ordered pair for it's mapping
Yeah
if f(18)=-12 then f^-1(12)=18
Yeah that's the inverse
inverse function is the mapping from the set of outputs of function f to it's input
Oh right now I see what your saying
Great, so I think you have a start now
so clearly now you can figure out f^-1(77)
It's 23
Think about it
Just a point, if you have two inputs mapping to single output, then the inverse will not exist
because it breaks the condition of being a function when considering f^-1
the first condition is that all the inputs must have distinct, unique ouput
Yeah, i first thought I'd have to sub in 77 for every x value and solve
or for inverse to exist for f, f must be a bijection
But I figured that wouldn't make sense
Great
Good job.
.close
Closed by @slim viper
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
,rotate
you can use the Pythagorean theorem to find the hypotenuse of the triangle
and to find the distance, you can add up the two streets
FinnaganFox
this is for helping, instead of doing the work for you
In particular, how comes the friend can't make the post here themselves?
No
.
Right there
Have you ever seen that equation?
That's a geometry related equation
So you're saying you haven't done geometry?
No one is here to do work for others
Also, why are you asking for help for another person? If it's their work, they should be the one to do it
you can use the Pythagorean theorem to find the hypotenuse of the triangle
and to find the distance, you can add up the two streets
That's what you need
With that
If you don't recall Pythagorean theorem, then two things, either look up videos or don't do the work for other people and let them do it on their own
They are going to learn if you do their work
Then the real question is, how can you teach it to someone else if you don't know it yourself?
this video can teach it to you, these channels are more for helping with specific problems
Sounds like you teaching but with extra steps
You watched the entire video in 2 minutes?
You have fingers and a wifi, you can look up Pythagorean theorem
That's other videos, key word other. Maybe this video will help
If you can't explain why you're lost then how do you expect people to help
Did you tho
It's a 10 minute video, I literally just scrolled through it and it explains it really well
And is not complicated at all
And pretty neat
It's "complicated" due to the fact you don't know what Pythagorean theorem is in the first place
Just get your friend to ask on here themself
So if you, yourself, can't recognize those terms, then you're going to have trouble yourself
Hence why the video would help you understand it
You don't understand it due to the fact you don't know what Pythagorean theorem is in the first place
So back to this statement
If you don't recall Pythagorean theorem, then two things, either look up videos or don't do the work for other people and let them do it on their own
The video explains it
^
.
No
Then look up other videos
We're not google
You didn't look hard enough
This geometry video tutorial provides a basic introduction into the pythagorean theorem. It explains how to use it to find missing sides and solve for x. In addition, it provides examples of solving word problems using pythagorean theorem for shapes such as right triangles, squares, rhombuses, and trapezoids. This video explains how to calcul...
Ace your next test: https://bit.ly/2VAnjTb
---RECOMMENDED STUDY RESOURCES---
Genetics: https://amzn.to/2BzK1S2
Biology I: https://amzn.to/2SasaIl
Biology terminology: https://amzn.to/2BBHuXo
How to Become a Straight-A Student: https://amzn.to/2VCfWdG
---DIVE IN---
Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/2MinuteClasroom
Get Involved with...
Literally multiple resources I just provide using google
what
pftt if your going to harrass me im going to block you
im sorry, but I cannot help you any further, please dont contact me further.
<@&268886789983436800>
Closed by @peak relic
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
thank you!
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed by @dire geode
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
,rotate
.reopen
✅
Are you the other guys friend?
9A, most likely you're them again
Well you've just sent the exact same question so don't feign ignorance
Unlikely
Wow such insight
u didnt have to repost the quesion then
<@&268886789983436800> possibly ban evasion?
Lol
it's actually the same question, huh?
cute
"just cuz I'm black"
let's not even get into that one
Ty ryc
Closed by @peak relic
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi guys. I'm a bit unsure about eigenvectors and how to determine them.
So for your matrix A, an eigenvector v will be a vector such that Av = λv for some scalar λ
From this definition & what the question's asking, would you have ideas about how to proceed?
Would we substitute what we know into the formula and solve for the Scalar?
Well the idea is you test whether for each of these vectors v, Av returns a scalar multiple of v
So you'd try A times each of these vectors and see which outputs a scalar multiple of the vector in question
I see
Should we know what the scalar multiple is?
Or would any constant it spits out work?
(Constant which is a multiple of the vector)
Or should I find λ given a vector
Oh hang on I've worked it out
Using the characteristic polynomial, it says it on the bottom there
Thank you for the kickstart tho!!
.close
Closed by @blissful pagoda
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i dont really understand why she shaded the left, like what was the reason to do so, and what does it mean to “shade above” or to “shade below”
You want the region where y≥7x+4, so you take the line y=7x+4 and shade the region above that line (you could get confused if you say right/left, it's better to say above/below) since you have to find where the y is greater than or equal to that expression
Every point that is above that line satisfies the condition
Because taking a point above that line is like taking a point which has the same x as one of the points of that line, but has a greater y
So being “above the line” would mean to shade where though
Thats what I dont get
because its not really “above” the line
If the line was less steep you would get it
Try imagining a line that's almost horizontal, there you can distinguish better between above and below
ohhh okay, i see
Here the line is steeper but the concept is the same
oh no, im not confused about the graphing
initial meaning when the line touches the y coordinate when x is 0
just the above and below part
wym
Closed by @vivid cargo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hel
,rccw
1. I don't know where to begin
2. I have begun but got stuck midway
3. I got an answer but I'm told it's wrong
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked
5. I have a question about someone else's worked solution
6. None of the above
which stage are you on?
||this problem, taken at face value, contradicts itself. if MNOPQR really was a regular hexagon, then NQ would be exactly twice as long as OP, but it is explicitly stated not to!||
@hollow sleet
I am not on any stage
chapter is about trapeziums
by "stage" i mean "one of the 6 items on the list i just posted"
i.e. how far along you are with solving the problem
okay
right
yeah, then the first step would be to point out the self-contradiction in this problem.
i'd skip it outright and tell your teacher that the problem is screwed up.
I have bought a book to practice so i am teacher 😂
I think the point of regularity was that the two triangles were supposed to have equal sides and hence equal area
well, then you should have no qualms with skipping the problem @hollow sleet
i don't think a hexagon that isn't regular should ever be called regular.
if triangles MNO and RQP were supposed to be congruent, then the problem should've stated that outright, or provided us with the data necessary to conclude it.
True, ture they could have explicitly mentioned if this were the case
Alright.. so evidently the problem is messed up
@hollow sleet Has your question been resolved?
it is 8th class problem
Well according to the contradiction you are right an NQ should be 26 cm instead of 23 cm. Then whatever you can correct it since you are a teacher and at sometimes people do make mistakes when typing
And some questions are just wrong, like this one
Take it from us and change the question so it has accurate phrasing if you're giving it to students
What is wrong here please make some effort to explain
A regular hexagon cannot have the lengths as stated
On what basis you are saying please explain that too
Because all internal angles are 120 degrees, drawing a vertical NQ intersecting MO at a point (call it A) means that triangle MNA is a 30-60-90 triangle
This implies NA is precisely half of MN
But the same argument can be done for the bottom triangle, which means NQ must be twice of any edge length, so twice of MR
I see you joined NQ it intersects MO at A, how is MNA 30-60-90, i get that angle NMA= 30 but how did you conclude the others?
As 60,90
Is NA perpendicular to MO
If yes then prove it beforehand
it has to bisect MNO, standard property for regular hexagons
@hollow sleet Has your question been resolved?
Yes you are correct i didn't check that I calculated it earlier the area and it matched with the answer ,by basics of congruency and Pythagoras. When i see now yes it's incorrect sin theta =5/12 (theta=MNA in your case), it should be 1/2
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
If i sqrt 4p^4 it would be 2p^2 right?
yes
Closed by @meager glade
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
no
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
good morning, i've a question
How can i proof that the graphs 0!/(x! * (-x)!) and sin(pi * x)/(pi * x) have the same graphics?
rewrite 1/(x! (-x)!) in terms of the Gamma function and apply the gamma reflection formula
i was thinking in something about prod
because in some place i've seen a sin definition using this
Yk what. a sin graph looks like
i'll try this
ty
.close
Closed by @bitter panther
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
the quistion is to intergrate using cylindrical coardinates i understand how this is done but i dont know how to get the lower and upper bounds for dr d_theta
@rose dragon Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
.close
Closed by @rose dragon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
claimed
How do i take the inverse laplace of this?
I know the answer but just not how to get there
Use a table of transforms
Highlighted prt is what i dont understand
They've times by 1=3/3 to make it look like a familiar transform
how do you know to do this?
You look at your table and see which it's most similar to and then get it in the right form
Yeah i see that is sin(at), What i'm trying to say is how do i step by step change 1/s^2+9 into 1/3*3/s^2+3^2
Times by 3/3
All of it? some of it?
ΣAC
Replace x with whatever you want
@tender cobalt Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @tender cobalt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how can i solve this
Have you done any working?
Step by step is still doing it
no
sec(x-y)=1/cos(x-y)
no not show anything
Now solve further by yourself
just instruction one at a time
idk what else to do
ill give you 1 step but you do it ]
ok
show me it and if its correct we go next step if it aint ill tell you where you went wrong

show u what ?
HELLO
Hint: can we divide and multiply with something?
ayyyo
ill give you the step
then you do what it says
and see if you do it correctly
Both numerator and denominator
1+1=11?
idk
Don't troll
ok give me the step
oki xc
so try get the L.H.S and R.H.S to = a number
what should you divide sinx siny to make tanx tany?
dude thats what im trying to do
by giving x and y a value
Just divide the numerator and denominator by cos(x).cos(y)
Think of dividing by some term here
.
Nicely spitted
sec(?) = 2
we can divide it by cos x cos y
Yes
Control ur urges
nah we cant do that
i tried that
i gac
Hence proved
Just try what he said here
No shit sherlock
