#help-10
1 messages · Page 538 of 1
Wut
So how would we write it on the solution set indicator?
$well I tried some numbers and got that \sqrt{-1}=1$
.,..
but im dumb
yes
No clue how and what that is
The line thing
.,..
if x=1 it is sqrt1=-1
So it wouldn’t be infinite?
correct
But how would you graph it?
I know the range but I'm trying to figure out how to do it by hand
We went through these like 6 months ago but I don't think I saw one like this
How about number 7
What do you think it is
Can’t be c or d
And why is that
Is it b?
Damn it’s d
Could we do one more ?
sure
the first one?
Yeah it’s with question 7
What you thinking
I think b is solution
thats one of them
E is another
what about D
It wasn’t a solution for D?
how did ypu get E
I simplified X^2 - 4^2
Could we do the last one?
Wait wouldn’t C be solution?
hmm
?
sorry i gtg
Closed by @gray creek
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i cant get this, i mult
divide by √(ab) on both sides
its a positive value anyways
$\frac{ab}{\sqrt{ab}} = \frac{(ab)^{1}}{(ab)^{\frac{1}{2}}}$
kinglacto
use exponent laws
i will try thx
@lilac loom Has your question been resolved?
yeah and now simplify further
(rt(a)-rt(b))^2>=0 right?
now expand it
yes a, b > 0
seems like youre trying to prove the A.M G.M inequality?
ye
this is the exercice;
^
@lilac loom Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Working on 102, I’m not sure how to continue. Do I plug in t between 0 and 2pi?
<@&286206848099549185>
@sly folio Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@sly folio Has your question been resolved?
dackid
The arclength formula of an ellipse is famously one that can not be solved directly, as there is no known antiderivative
dackid
@sly folio Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @jade hornet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
if i have to integrate 1/(x^2 + 9)
can i not just get the reciprocal and integrate that?
or do i have to use substitution
Hear me out, you can substitute x=3u
No you can't just integrate the denominator haha
Take out 1/9 and then you have the derivative of inverse tan
So $\int {\frac{1}{x^2+9}dx = \int {\frac{3}{9u^2+9}du = 3/9 \int {\frac{1}{u^2+1}du = 1/3arctan(u) +c = 1/3arctan(x/3) +c$
Max..
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
yeah well you see our professor told us nothing bout that so it would be pretty weird for me to use such method on a assignment
like ive got no clue what arctan is
the actual question is a definite integral if that makes any difference
Are the bounds in terms of pi?
That can be done via partial fractions
@jade hornet So there is no perimeter formula of an ellipse?
$\int \frac{1}{ x^2-9}dx$ we can use the fact $\frac{1}{ x^2-9}= \frac{1}{ (x-3)(x+3)}= \frac{A}{ x+3}+\frac{B}{x-3}$
Max..
Then you can find A and B by reputting the fraction together and equalling the numerator
Also @jade hornet, it asks for the area??
right yeah
i always understood that part but never understood what id do with A and B after finding them
Well you can split the integral
No, there certainly is not
$\int \frac{1}{ x^2-9}dx= \int \frac{A}{ x-3}dx+\int \frac{B}{ x+3}dx= A\int \frac{1}{ x-3}dx+B\int \frac{1}{ x+3}dx$
Max..
Okay. But the formula I should be using is $\int ydx$, right?
And then the integral of 1/(x+a) = ln|x+a|
FivePixels
Between 0 and 2pi
Based on what it says, yes
No, polar form is good. But use the one for the area, not the perimeter.
ahhhh i seee
I'm confused, polar form? What formula would that be?
okay that makes much more sense appreciate it 🙂
Np
do i close the channel lol or let the other guys keep going
Nvm, that's not helpful. I think $2\int y dx$ is the way to go. I have $2$ there becaue that integral only evaluates half the area
dackid
Let us finish. He was here before you (I closed it earlier)
So the form I suggested is just half of the ellipse, doubling gives the full ellipse? On an example I found online, it suggests that $\int ydx$ only gives 1/4 of the circle
FivePixels
You are NOT in polar coordinates here
Right, these are cartesian
I guess I don't understand how that's relevant to the problem though.
The bounds 0 to 2pi don't mean jack since you aren't in polar coordinates
Should we be in polar coordinates?
Not necessary
Then if 0 to 2pi doesn't matter, what should our bounds be?
Just take the indefinite integral?
Feel free to start there
@alpine trout Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
That's not how integrals work
An integral of a product is not the product of integrals
You just want to find the antiderivative of sin^2(theta)
The antiderivative of that can be found in 2 ways right
Just cos 2theta substitution
Or reducing it as 1/2- sinxcosx/2
Yes that works
Simplified = -theta + 1/2 divided by sin(2theta)
Small mistakes
I think I see it
You forget to multiply the -2 into -cos(2theta)
-2 should be multiplied across both integrals
Yes. Make sure you can understand your own writing.
Right sin(2theta) should have been on top, since we're multiplying the whole thing by it.
No we are not
Well
I meant on my original solution
Where I had the mistake
sin(2theta) should have been in the numerator is my point
In my picutre
Right?
When I say the whole thing, I just mean multiplying (sin(2theta)/1) times everything. So it multiplies the top by that.
@jade hornet
That negative concerns me a bit. I understand the logic, but your area should end up being positive
Oh, actually it's right. So because you multiplied by 4, your bounds are from 0 to pi/2.
However, if we integrate with respect to x, then that is going from right to left. So the true area starts at pi/2 and ends at 0
Then you'll get the area
I don’t understand this. What makes this the bounds?
Think about it. The original integral evaluates $\int_0^a y dx$. But once you change your parameters, $a\cos(\frac{\pi}{2})=0$ and $a\cos(0)=a$. So your new bounds go from $\frac{\pi}{2}$ to $0$.
dackid
@alpine trout Has your question been resolved?
@alpine trout you can respond yes so you stop being pinged
but it would close the channel no?
No, the other way around
Right, since the definite integral should return positive
Yes, but also setting $x=a\cos(\theta)$ gives us our bounds for $\theta$ with u-substitution
dackid
Could you explain further?
This explains it further
What do you mean by parameters?
Ah wait. So cos(pi/2) = 0, and cos(0) = 1, okay. So the arithmetic is checking out now.
Yes, more importantly, acos(pi/2)=0 and acos(0)=a
Right
So the bounds reverse
We just plug in what I typed.
We evaluate the integral from pi/2 to 0 instead of from 0 to pi/2
Right, because when we evaluate the x at the original 0 to pi/2, we get the inverse as the result of the bounds.
Yep, right idea
I kind of understand that but it doesn't seem the most grounded. Is there a different way of thinking about it?
You're misunderstanding. If we solve acos(theta)=0 for theta, we get theta=pi/2. Similarly, acos(theta)=a gives theta=0
Well, there is a periodicity thing, but we only care about the range [0,pi) for inverse cosine
So what happens to a in the case of the first one? We just divide 0/a and are left with cos(theta) = 0 right? And take the inverse cosine of 0, to get the theta of pi/2?
Right, so we wouldn't need to worry about -pi/2 since it's not in the inverse cosine range
@alpine trout Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @alpine trout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help on this problem
I solved it I just don’t understand the graph part
How would I plot X^2 - 4x + 4 = X^2 - 4x + 4?
Oh wait
if theyre the same function, its just all numbers
basically
<---------------------------------------------------------------------------->
well no
actually
because you have a square root
Oh
what are the x intercepts of $x^{2}-4x+4$
Umbraleviathan
(x - 4) (x-2)
Oh no it’s (x-2)^2
Yeah it’s been a while since I’ve done this 😞
Is it the intercept
Well yes
But its also the vertex
and because x^2 has a positive coefficient, 0 is also the abolsute minimum
Meaning that for all x values, $x^{2}-4x+4\ge0$
so you verified that
which is good
hold on
God it’s been a while since I’ve done this
Umbraleviathan
yeah you need to check for extraneous solutions
so, that means youve verified that x can be all numbers
so it is <----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->
You want to make sure that some numbers will not make the sqrt function have complex solutions
What’s the difference between closed and open again?
closed is inclusive of the endpoint
open is not inclusive of the endpoint
but because x is all real numbers
its just gonna be a line
two rays, per se
So how would the rays be on 2 and go to the right?
.close
Closed by @gray creek
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i prove that 0 < a*b < 1 when 0 < a < 1 and 0 < b < 1?
it should be obvious
if two numbers
lie between 0 and 1
then obviously there product will be between 0 and 1
But for what reason?
is it because you're essentially doing a fraction multiplied by a fraction
I guess I'm a bit confused putting it into words or a statement that proves the reason why
Result:
0.08
Then would my justification be for the proof that my values are two fractions less than one being multiplied reducing their values?
If $0<a<1$ and $0<b<1$ then $a=\frac{m}{n}$ where $m<n$ and $b=\frac{p}{q}$ where $p<q$ $ab = \frac{mp}{nq}$. Since $m<n$ and $p<q$ then $mp < nq$ and hence $0<ab<1$
azeem321
ohh I see this makes a lot of sense thank you!
@vital brook Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @vital brook
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
(ii)
So for this, I got $(z_4-z_2)e^{i\frac{\pi}{2}} = z_6-z_3 \implies (z_4-z_2)i=z_6-z_3$
azeem321
Is this what they are after?
@strong vale Has your question been resolved?
if this is true then that directly implies they are perpendicular
Closed by @strong vale
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Someone help pleasee
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
@timid silo Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @hushed plinth
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
guys i cant simplify this question
i need to solve it, but idk how to remove the sqrt inside a sqrt
you need to express whatever is inside the outer sqrt in the form of (a+b)^2
try to think how you can do it
hint: || 6root2 will be the 2ab term ||
Closed by @plush valley
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi again. When two lines intersect, the opposite angles are equal, agreed?
So, y (the yellow angle) is made up of two angles. We know one is 90 degrees because it's opposite from a given 90 degree angle.
The other angle making up y is opposite from x, so it is also x.
oh
So 90 + x = y
all makes sense now
🙂
Closed by @versed zinc
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi
.close
Closed by @unkempt swift
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
The division you're doing is finding out how many cups you need for 5l of oj.
Try writing out an equation and introduce a variable for the number of cups.
Closed by @raw sparrow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
for this question
to make it equal to f1
what do we state type of transformation is required??
Well in order for 1/(4x^2) to become 1/x^2, what do we have to do to 1/(4x^2)?
@crisp dune Has your question been resolved?
multiply it by 1/4
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can anyone help me prove this theorem?
@rugged void Has your question been resolved?
did you try using fubini's theorem?
Yes but Fubinis theorem only works if intergral is finite
Tonellis theorem works for non-negative functions
fubini's (or tonelli's) applied to |f| and |g|?
For the second part we can use Tonelli but how do I change \int|\int f(x-y) g(y) dy| dx to \int\int |f(x-y)g(y)| dx dy
to
$\int \int |f(x-y) g(y)| dx dy = \int |g(y)| \int |f(x-y)| dx dy = \int |g(y)| |f| dy = |f| \int |g(y)| dy = |f | |g|$ and the RHS is finite since f and g are integrable. Then observe that $\int |fg| = \int |\int f(x-y)g(y)dy| dx$ is less than or equal to the LHS of the first equation I wrote. Therefore $|fg|$ is integrable so in particular it is finite a.e.
OurBelovedBungo
Thank you that solves the second part of the theorem. Do I prove the first part by using fg < |fg| and hence is finite then we can use Fubini's theorem?
yeah, integrability of |f*g| implies integrability of f*g (assuming you've established that f*g is measurable), so Fubini applies with f and g (not just with |f| and |g|)
Also, in the theorem it states f, g measurable and integrable implies f*g is measurable. Is it some famous result that I don't know of?
ah, I couldn't recall how to prove that f*g is measurable, it's in several of my textbooks but that's not easy to copy/paste here. but you can check this PDF on page 16: https://people.math.gatech.edu/~heil/6338/summer08/section4c_convolve.pdf
Closed by @rugged void
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i solve a quadratic equations
there's a number of ways
if it's factorable, that can help, you could factor and use the zero product property
if applicable
you could use the quadratic formula, which never fails
you could also complete the square
i dont have that formula
hmmm
ok?
bc i have a qestion that is 3x2+3x-6=0
the 2 is like tiny and beside the x and its over it to idk
?
why are you working with quadratics if you don't know what an exponent is
well if you don't understand the basics, don't expect to understand things that rely on knowing the basics
you can't learn something without having a foundation
if you want to learn concepts, go to youtube
ok
i'd suggest a review of arithmetic
what is arthmaetic
ok
You should probably learn the other material that leads up to quadratics
@lyric rune Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@bright geyser Has your question been resolved?
Consider the function f(x)-x
Why?
We can show via intermediate value theorem that this function definitely achieves value of 0 for some x in [0,1]
I don't really understand or see how
How did you conclude f(0)≠f(1) ?
Suppose there is no c in [0,1] such that f(c)=c. That means f(0)-0>0 and f(1)-1<0. Precisely our function f(x)-x evaluated at 0 and 1
isnt that the definitiion
Why does that mean that?
I dont really understand
Not necessarily. Consider the function f(x)=0 for all x in [0,1] it satisfies all the conditions in the question
huh
that doesnt make sense then does it
if f(x) = 0
Nowhere in the question does it say f(0)≠f(1)
then f(a) and f(b) bound nothing
Is it not implied by the actual definition of IVT that im using?
But it is a valid continuous function from [0,1] to [0,1]
That doesnt mean that f(c) = k
i don't think we're on the same page im quite confused now
IVT does require f(a)≠f(b) sure. But not necessarily the question
reposting q for referencing
from the intermediate value theorem
we have to show that f(a) < k < f(b) or f(b) < k < f(a) right
We are applying IVT on the function f(x)-x as i said earlier
Why?
Ok then tell me how does that show f(c)=c for some c in [0,1]
thats my point idk lol
it's not some specific constant value analogous to "k" in the IVT
But if we do show there is some "c" in [0,1] such that f(x)-x achieves 0 there it is equivalent to saying f(c)=c
hmm maybe im starting to get it
so youre proiving that f(c) - c = 0 essentially
which is equivilant to f(c) = c?
In our question, we need to show f(c)=c for some c in [0,1]. IVT directly on the function f doesn't work
hmm okay i am kinda understanding the goal ate last now
And now, we start with this
proof by contradiction?
Well, you could also do direct proof
maybe id like to try direct proof
im not completely sure where the inequalities are from im sorry
They are easy to see actually. Codomain of our function f is [0,1]. Which means f(0)≥0 implying f(0)-0≥0 but if f(0)=0 we already have a contradiction. Thus we assume f(0)-0>0. And similarly for f(1)-1<0
1≥f(x)≥0 for all x in [0,1]
Try this
is this the direct proof>
?
No. It was my attempt to explain the proof by contradiction earlier. Direct proof is also similar to this actually.
Ignore all that lets start the proof from scratch
Thank you for your patience btw 🙂
First of all, f(0)≥0
Well ofcourse that's where f(0)≥0 comes from
okiee
Well, 1>=f(0)>=0
Anyways, if we do have f(0)=0, we already have our required c
Ye sure
So we assume f(0)>0 which is same as saying f(0)-0>0
sure
And ofcourse this also comes from 0≤f(1)≤1
okie dokie i get that
And that's equivalent to saying f(1)-1<0
yee
Now, we consider the function f(x)-x on domain [0,1]
ye]
Now we actually have f(1)-1<0<f(0)-0 combining the two inequalities from earlier
Which means we also have f(1)-1≠f(0)-0
All the required conditions for IVT are satisfied for our function f(x)-x on [0,1]
f(x)-x is a continuous function on [0,1] where f(0)-0>0 and f(1)-1<0. It means there exists some c in (0,1) such that f(c)-c=0
@bright geyser
It looks just like the IVT here
alright this is what i dont understand
why are you assuming this
Well, we definitely have f(0)≥0
Yep
It was just broken into two cases f(0)=0 or f(0)>0
ahh
the goal here is
f(x) - x < 0 < f(x) - x right?
sorry
f(0) - 0 < 0 < f(1) - 1
Well, yes just the other way around
f(0)-0>0>f(1)-1
so youre saying ignoring the cases where f(0) = 0 and f(1) = 1
we have that^^
Now i dont fully understand why we ignore those cases
Well, we did address those cases so it's not exactly ignoring
hmm
so like f(1) <= 1 and f(0) >= 0
ahh i understand that there is a f(c) = c from the cases where f(1) = 1 and f(0) = 0
but i dont understand the function of the exclusion
or how you can just freely do it
By definition, a ≤ b means a < b or a=b
yep
So it naturally breaks into cases
omg wait okay okay okay
one sec lemme try and write this out
Case 1: f(1) = 1 or f(0) = 0
In one case we address f(0)=0 and in other we can take f(0)>0 with worrying about f(0)=0
we automatically have f(c) = c if this is the case
the next case
f(1) < 1 and f(0) > 0
implies
f(1) - 1 < 0 and f(0) - 0 > 0
which omplies
f(0) - 0 > 0 < f(1) - 1
which now for the function f(x) - x
f(0) - 0 > 0 > f(1) - 1
implies that there is some c such that f(c) - c = 0 by IVT
and therefore in this second case f(c) = c?
is that it
Yep you got it!
Glad I could help
Also, saying c in [0,1] is important since that's where f(x)-x operates
ttytytytytytytytyytytytytytytytytytytytytyytyyt\
.close
Closed by @bright geyser
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
!close
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone check if my answer is correct?
What is 'they'
where
Your description of the discontinuity is almost there
But in general I think you need to be more specific in what you mean
The function is not correct by the way
What is the charge for someone who parks 4.4 hours?
Your function does not correctly specify that
Also, the charge does not linearly increase (for any part of its domain) like how your function is currently being defined
So first, I'd think about how to define the function
Im lost on how to add 6 dollars additionally after half an hour
Are you aware of $\mathbb{N}$
pepper
no i wasnt taught of that :(
ik the floor and ceiling onee
I park for
25 minutes - what is the charge?
45 minutes - ?
70 minutes - ?
100 minutes - ?
500 minutes - ?
Ah good, you'll need it
Try these values
ok hold on
idk how to subtract 5 mins from the 6 dollars
It's not 'subtract 5 minutes'
25 minutes is 6 dollars
45 minutes is 12 dollars
70 minutes is 18 dollars
isnt it 30 mins 6 dollars
may i suggest a slightly different way of looking at this pricing scheme
yes plss
you pay $6 for each half hour of parking time, rounded up to the nearest half-hour multiple.
is that supposed to mean that you don't get what i am saying at all? or do you not get why my phrasing refers to the same thing as the problem? or do you not get how to translate my phrasing into a formula?
phrasing into formula
have you heard of the floor and ceiling functions?
yess
okay
so now just to be clear, what unit do you want to measure time in? hours or minutes?
neither choice is less valid than the other but it'll affect what the formula will look like
im not sure but the problem says half an hr im assuming hr?
it didnt tell me what specific unit
kat, do you think that was a question with a right and a wrong answer?
because it wasn't.
i specifically said there was no wrong answer here.
i guess hour
if you want to go with measuring time in hours then just say hours lol
okay, hours it is
ok sorry i wasnt sure huhu
now the following is a question with a right and a wrong answer:
since we are rounding up, what rounding function do we use? floor or ceil?
ceil
correct
sure
ok ty!
we didn't really get to the part where the unit matters anyway
well, we were about to get there but you stopped just moments prior
but ok, minutes it is
now we need to find how many half-hours there are in x minutes
as i am sure you know there are 30 minutes in a half-hour, so...
yes
when you convert x minutes into half-hours, what do you get?
30
60
90
no, that's nowhere near it
well
are you familiar with the concept of unit conversion at all
so you do not know how to do things such as convert lengths between feet and inches?
so you are familiar with this concept. ok
yes
so let's try to jog your memory a little
there are 12 inches in a foot.
if you have a measurement listed in inches and you want to convert it to feet, what do you do?
"divide the number by 12" and "always say it's 1 foot no matter what" are very different things to do, don't you agree?
yes
"a measurement listed in inches" does NOT mean "a measurement that says 12 inches" despite the presence of the number 12 in the previous sentence...
okok
would recommend not latching onto the first number you see out of desperation to use something as the input to some arithmetic.
but other than that, yes, to convert a measurement from inches to feet you divide the number by 12.
now in the same token
okk
there are 30 minutes in a half-hour.
if you have a length of time listed in minutes and you want to convert it to half-hours, what do you do?
30 = 1 half hr
60 = 2 half hrs
so basically i divide it by 30
those two first sentences were entirely unnecessary
i was intending for you to follow purely by analogy with the foot/inch thing.
i meant divide by 30
two units, one of them a multiple of the other.
but yes, so to convert from minutes to half-hours you divide by 30.
and now, to bring in the "rounded up" thing
a parking time of x minutes is counted as ceil(x/30) half-hours.
is your teacher requiring you to write it as a piecewise function?
yes
that's strange.
i mean, you could shoehorn a piecewise definition in, but there's no need to
the price for $x$ minutes of parking is simply $f(x) = 6 \ceil{x/30}$
Ann
this works regardless of whether x is less than 30 or greater than 30
she prefers me to put a piecewise function and conclude what the discontinuities mean
so just to be clear, despite this, your teacher is FORCING you to write down a PIECEWISE FORMULA for the function, and will REJECT OUTRIGHT any answer that doesn't write it like that
is that correct?
am i understanding you correctly?
yes
okay, then i guess we will have to do something stupid like this:
my friend put like
6 ; 0<x__<__30
so on
$f(x) = \begin{cases} 6 & 0 < x \leq 30 \12 & 30 < x \leq 60 \ 18 & 60 < x \leq 90 \ 24 & 90 < x \leq 120 \ \vdots & \vdots \end{cases}$
yeaa
Ann
like this
and this despite your class knowing about the existence of the ceiling function
presumably
ooo ok tysm i get it now
what is there to get? i didn't write anything new.
i just didnt know how to form the piecewise function
all i did was transcribe the definition that you just said your friend wrote down, no?
i guess this one has the benefit of explicitly highlighting the first few points of discontinuity in the pricing function.
namely the ones at x=30, x=60, x=90, etc.
yess
every half hour the price jumps up by $6
thank you so much for the help! sorry if i wasted any of your time
Closed by @lament osprey
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, Im struggling a bit with this problem
problem description/context:
Silvia has n dresses and decides which one to wear by flipping a symmetric coin. If the coin shows tails, the dress is ready for the next turn, however if the coin shows heads then it goes back into the wardrobe. This is repeated for all n dresses until the first turn is over and repeat for the dresses left in the selection.
question:
Determine a random variable X (in terms of X_i, i € N) that counts how many times Silvia flips her coin totally (NOTE: it is already n times the first turn).
my attempt:
but it feels like i have done something terribly wrong
feels like it should be way simpler
I'm not sure if I'm right, but consider only 1 dress. What is this distribution?
It generalises to n dresses by independent sums.
binomial?
1 dress is binomial?
@tired gull Has your question been resolved?
oh, yeah sorry.
So is that a yes or a no?
well my reasoning was that it is always binomial, no matter the amount of dresses
By the binomial random variable
I suppose you mean the number of success and failures for a turn
Instead of that
focus on the total number of coin flips
Consider one dress
What is the random variable
That represents how many coin flips there are?
n coin flips representing n dresses
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hei, how do I go on to solve these problems
@wispy brook Has your question been resolved?
@wispy brook Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help with this question
@wanton dagger Has your question been resolved?
this misprint makes the question impossible to solve
one of the four inequality symbols (<, ≤, >, ≥) was mistakenly replaced by °
but there's no telling which one it was
Oh
so the only correct course of action is to let your teacher know about this so that they can tell you what the inequality symbol was.
Closed by @wanton dagger
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
mainly looking for someone who can look over my answers, pretty sure this is right since if your under 30 it doesnt matter, andsince charlie has feature A it doesnt matter if they are below 30
yes, that is correct
@swift heart Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @swift heart
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why is it that when you square root both sides the 2 on the denominator is under the square root and not the whole fraction?
Closed by @tulip aspen
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What I've tried so far:
I moved the triangle to the origin (see attached image)
Where I'm stuck:
I don't know what to do next
can't you literally just count the boxes?
I wrote this equation ||$z-3-2i=e^{i \theta}(3+4i).$|| trying to relate $z-3-2i$ and $3+4i$
Prem
no because its not exactly on a point
Since no one is helping, I'll throw out a suggestion, but I don't know if it will work. Write the two equations for distance from z to each of the other points.
@timid silo Has your question been resolved?
Yea, that's all it is this time around. @timid silo you can find the point just like you would by finding an (x,y) pair: determine the real part,which corresponds to the x-axis, and the imaginary part, corresponds to the y-value. Since the grid is there, it is pretty easy to determine what z is
what do you even have to do
They need to determine what z is
oh
The problem is generous, since all you need to focus on is the grid.
No need for any fancy equations, just count the boxes
But z is slightly off of it being 2+5/2i or whatever it iw
so just \approx 2+5/2 lol
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
for 5a is the only way to find the eigenvector of A^2 - 3I to calculate A^2 - 3I and then use the eigenvalues we know to figure out the eigenvector?
<@&286206848099549185>
@vague scroll Has your question been resolved?
@vague scroll Has your question been resolved?
@vague scroll Has your question been resolved?
@vague scroll Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can you show work?
sin(x) is not equal to 1 at x=0
your answers for when sin(x) = -1/2 are fine, but you don't need the +(2 pi k) because only for k=0 will those values be in the interval [0, 2pi)
ik i didn't include it. i just wrote it as a habit
i don't understand what is happening starting at the line with the 2*sqrt(3), where did that come from?
look more to the right under the graph. those are my solutions
that's another problem dont mind it
i see
well as @short spruce said, x=0 is not a solution
the other three are fine
is that my only mistake?
the x=0 solution needs to be replaced with a correct solution
i don't really get the [0, 2pi). I thought it should include 0
there is only one correct solution for sin(x) = 1 in that interval, no?
pi/2?
right
which is already listed
but sin(0) is not 1, so x=0 is not a solution
(it's not a solution to 2sin(x) + 1 = 0 either)
so just get rid of 0 from my list of solutions?
correct
Closed by @inner raft
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is the 8 positive in this equation: -3 - 8
i think so
why would it be positive
uh
no theres space between the minus sign and 8
it's the same thing
exactly
whitespace doesn't matter
you can read it as -3+(-8)
ohh
-3+(-8)
which makes 8 a negative
thanks
yeah
don't just tell people answers :/
.close
Closed by @royal valley
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how can i make an implicit equation for 3 dimensions out of 2 points?
i know the vectorial form for a plane in 3 dimensions is something like t(a,b,c) + s(d,e,f) + P where P is a point
so, if i have these two points P=(-2,3,4) and Q=(-1,3,1) i could maybe start from one of these two points, say, P a,d build something like t(a,b,c) + s(d,e,f) + (-2,3,4)
but how could i find the scalars t and s and the directors (a,b,c) and (d,e,f)?
if it was in 2-d i could just calculate the slope and it would be easy but i don't think there's such thing as slope for 3d
@neon loom Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @neon loom
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
given that cosB=5/9, how'd i get sinB
is it possible to get the value of sinB with all the information on this picture
the final goal is the area of triangle ABC
and i know heron's formula could be very useful in this case
but i want to do it another way
the area will also be (1/2) * 6 * 3 * sinB
in order to get the answer, i have to get the sinB
do you guys have any idea about sinB
could you do reverse sinB to find the angle of B
angle B would be 56.4427 degrees
can you recall an identity linking sin and cos?
sin^2+cos^2=1
nice, that would work
how'd you get angle B would be 56.4427 degrees?
that sounds fantastic, let me try
I did sin^-1(5/6) but I realized thats not a right triangle so im wrong
5/9 = 25/81?
They like to trick ya like that
(5 * 5)/(9 * 9)
you cancel out those 9 and 5 on both denominator and numerator
then you get 5/9
cuz i have to multiply those first right?
yup, I was verifying if that was what @brisk arrow meant
And no, that logic is wrong Grammar
the 9 and the 5 can't be cancelled out like that
Sounds like dino's got this. I'll leave y'all be
if that were the case, does 1/2 = (1^2)/(2^2)?
no
you can only cancel out factors that are present in both the numerator and denominator
i think i got it, i have to follow the calculation rule
i think the question is solved
i have found either the sinB's value or the area of the triangle
thank you guys
.close
Closed by @brisk arrow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is $f: \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}$ a bijection if $f(x) = x$? I mean, $f(a) = f(b) \implies a = b$, and for every $b \in \mathbb{R}$, there is an $a \in \mathbb{R}$ (which is $a = b$) so that $f(a) = b$
Taiga
yep
:o
so there's always a bijection $f: X \to X$ whether $X$ is an infinite set or a finite set?
Taiga
yea, the identity function works
Closed by @lapis mural
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
np 🙂
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
so if I want to prove that 2 sets have the same cardinality, I set up a function, I show that it is one-to-one , and onto. But here is the problem. How do I come up with this function (f(x) = ??) ? Do I have to use my imagination, or is there something I am missing?
sometimes coming up with a function for that can be tough 😵💫
yes thats why im confused
so yea, I'd say you have to use your imagination sometimes
there isn't one trick that will always work
how do I do that on a 1 hour exam lol
maybe the problems that could come up on your exam will be somewhat related to other problems you've seen already?
there aren't any universal tricks but some of the same ideas could work for different problems
what kind of class is this for?
discrete math
any examples in particular you are struggling on?
ok, cool
an idea you could have for this is to make a linear function that sends a to 0, and b to 1
what?
one thing that might sounds a little off about what I said is that 0 and 1 are not in S, and a and b are not in W
is that confusing or is it something else?
but the idea is that W and S are both like lines
if you think of them on the real number line
and you can transform one into the other by sending the endpoints of one to the endpoints of the other
and transforming all the other stuff in each of the sets
but that part kinda happens naturally when you do this
so f: W -> S and f: S -> W are the same?
hmm I'm not sure exactly what you are asking?
how would you solve this?
kasparov