#help-10
1 messages · Page 445 of 1
No
good
the way I have involves translating the function left to exploit symmetry but I am very sorry that I don't think I am in the position to explain this
It's ok, most of exprienced people here have failed to explain many things to me
Im special case
please don't say that. it's not you being bad or anything, I promise.
if you think I'm thinking that you're free to report me, idm
What
Whot
?
you're not allowed to use calculus?
nah chill, you're good
yeah no idea how to do this lmfao
No way
my idea involves shifting the function left 1 unit
Ok if people from here can't even solve this then I either need calculus or the author of the worksheets made these while drunk
so we use f(u + 1) instead
no it can be solved via algebra, but the process is of course longer
nah im not as goated as the helpers
Ill wait for a helper then
but if you're willing to try, you can do this
You need to expand
yes there is a crapton of expansion to be done
you can use the fact that the inflection point is the center of symmetry of the extrema (i.e. the smallest and largest values)
But I mean you need to expand your expalnation
oh lmao
What
I'll let Modus try first, cuz my method is bad

hey dont give up yet
Im not giving up
But still, you would have to be familiar with the formula for the inflection point of a cubic function (like x = -b/2a for quadratics)
Here it's simply x = -b/3a
I haven't been taught for cubic formula
In fact I never had cubic formula introduced yet
but we got this from calculus yes?
I don't think Modus is talking about the cubic formula
you also will not see the cubic formula in most syllabi
for a good reason
you can use Vieta's formulas, but calculus would be faster
x1 + x2 + x3 = -b/a
I haven't been taught vieta's formulas
💀
do you know am gm inequality
How does it look like
oh mb it's maximum
for a general quadratic $ax^2 + bx + c = 0$ with roots $\alpha$ and $\beta$, then
$$\alpha + \beta = -\frac{b}{a}$$
$$\alpha \cdot \beta = \frac{c}{a}$$
Towa
not useful here though cuz not a quadratic, but yes these are Vieta's formulas
No, don't kno wthis
hm, alright then. sorry for bringing it up
Buddy, don't be sorry
anyway I won't clog this channel any further. I'll let Modus handle this
Why are you sorry for
sorry for intruding and flooding
You aren't flooding buddy
hey man you're good 😭
You are showing me the things I am missing
wrong place and time
did they teach you that stuff?
No I don't know vietas something
idk how they're expecting you to solve this
I love it
I think we can find the inflection point and use symmetry from there?
TBH I don't know it shouldn't be that complicated
like the distance between the point of inflection and maxima is the same for minima
I wasn't taught that yet
damn
You know what I am just going to close this channel because this stupid question is creating destruction in my mind
I love everyone that appeared here and tried to help me
.close
Closed by @coarse birch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
\textbf{(c) Prove that if $a \neq b$, then $(a, b)$ has precisely two elements.}
\\
Choose any $a, b$, where $a \neq b$. Then by the Axiom of Extensionality, $a \neq b$, iff $\exists z(z \in x \land z \notin y) \lor (z \in y \land z \notin x)$
I am trying to prove this proposition
am i allowed to make logical negations like this?
Choose any $a, b$, where $a \neq b$. Then by the Axiom of Extensionality, $a \neq b$, iff $\exists z(z \in a \land z \notin b) \lor (z \in a \land z \notin b)$
toast
eh
i think that you got the second part wrong
But yeah, you are allowed to say that
kk
it follows just by logic
toast
so as long as i show there exists an element in the first set not in the second set, i am done right
yeah
you must suppose that a =/= b though
\textbf{(c) Prove that if $a \neq b$, then $(a, b)$ has precisely two elements.}
\\
Choose any $a, b$, where $a \neq b$. Observe that the sets ${a,b} \neq {b}$ by the Axiom of Extensionality, since $a \notin {a,b}$, but $a \notin {b}$, as $a \neq b$.
toast
is this too unrigorous
i mean its obviosu but idk if i formalyl proved anything
oops
\textbf{(c) Prove that if $a \neq b$, then $(a, b)$ has precisely two elements.}
\\
Choose any $a, b$, where $a \neq b$. Observe that the sets ${a,b} \neq {b}$ by the Axiom of Extensionality, since $a \in {a,b}$, but $a \notin {b}$, as $a \neq b$.
toast
do i need to show $a \ne b \implies a \notin {b}$?
toast
Hmm, what do they mean by "has precisely two elements"?
how did they define number of elements?
not exactly sure ngl
but i guess there are 2 things
in the set
\textbf{(c) Prove that if $a \neq b$, then $(a, b)$ has precisely two elements.}
\\
Choose any $a, b$, where $a \neq b$. Observe by the Pairing Axiom, we can generate some set ${b, b} = \forall w ( w \in {b,b} \iff (w = b \lor w = b))$. This is equivalent to $w \in {b,b} \iff w =b$. By the Axiom of Extensionality ${b,b} = {b}$. so $w \in {b} \iff w = b$. However, because $a \neq b$, then $a \notin b$. But $a \in {a, b}$. Thus by the negation of the Axiom of Extensionality, ${a,b} \neq {b}$, so the set ${{a,b}, {b}}$ contains precisely 2 elements.
toast
here is a more rigorous proof i wrote
Eh, if they didnt define it rigorously, why bother proving it rigorously
fair enough 😂
because a =/= b, a not in b?
oiops
typo
\textbf{(c) Prove that if $a \neq b$, then $(a, b)$ has precisely two elements.}
\\
Choose any $a, b$, where $a \neq b$. Observe by the Pairing Axiom, we can generate some set ${b, b} = \forall w ( w \in {b,b} \iff (w = b \lor w = b))$. This is equivalent to $w \in {b,b} \iff w =b$. By the Axiom of Extensionality ${b,b} = {b}$. so $w \in {b} \iff w = b$. However, because $a \neq b$, then $a \notin {b}$. But $a \in {a, b}$. Thus by the negation of the Axiom of Extensionality, ${a,b} \neq {b}$, so the set ${{a,b}, {b}}$ contains precisely 2 elements.
toast
have you proved that {{a, b}, {b}} exists?
i guess we cant set {b,b} = some logical statement eitehr
we assume it exiss i think
but i did it in a prior question
\textbf{a) Prove that for any two sets $a, b$, there is a unique $c = {{a,b}, {b}}$. We define this $c$ to be the \textit{ordered pair} $(a, b)$}
\\
Choose any sets $a$ and $b$. By the pairing axiom,, there exists a set ${a, b}$. Now by the pairing axiom again, we have the set that contains exactly the sets ${a,b}$ and ${b}$, namely $c = {{a,b}, {b}}$. Observe by the Axiom of Extensionality, if there exists $c'$ such that $c'$ contains the same elements as $c$, then $c = c'$ so $c$ is unique.
Sure, then why bother using the pairing axiom
toast
oh true
(a, b) = {{a, b}, {b}}, which has elements {a,b}, {b}. All you need is to check that they are distinct
i jut wanted to make sure i cant assume $a \ne b \implies a \notin {b}$?
toast
oops
yeah, thats false
i jut wanted to make sure i cant assume $a \ne b \implies a \notin {b}$?
toast
oh you mean not in {b}
Yeah, you can use that I'd say
The {} notation tells you all the elements the set has
so {b} has only b and nothing else (so it cant have a, since a != b)
ah right
yeah it should be obvious
i never really know what i can or cannot assume 🤣 especially cuz these questions are asked
so
"unrigorously" idk
if they didnt even define what "has 2 elements" means, or what the {} notation means, I wouldnt focus on full rigour that much
all you need is convince your prof that you know what you're talking about
kk
yep!
alr tysm
.solved
Closed by @zenith crest
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Prove that the set of all of polynomials with coefficients in F is a vector space of F^n
The set of all polynomials with coefficients in F is a vector space over F
@fringe blade Has your question been resolved?
$F[x] = { a_0 + a_1 x + \dots + a_n x^n \mid n \in \mathbb{N},\ a_i \in F }$
andre_al
<@&286206848099549185>
if F is a vector space, do you agree that if you sum polynomials with coefficients in F you obtain a new polynomial with coefficients in F ?
Yes
no no it's ok , if you have other question i can help
I was learning about linear combinations, I guess
@solemn mural, the zero polynomial
?
It is said that a polynomial is of degree m when a_m is not zero
a_m * x^m
So that means m is negative infinite?
I am confused by -infinity < m
The zero polynomial, basically
I have not taken abstract algebra courses
the only confusing thing for you is " -infinity < m " ? I want to make sure
“The polynomial that is zero is said to have a degree of negative infinity”
yes that is correct
That is confusing me
it's a convention, the purpose is to make some manipulations easier, the same as x^0 =1 , 0! =1 ....
i can show an example
Mmm, OK
if P,Q are polynomials deg(P*Q)=deg(P)+deg(Q) is still true with deg(p=0) = -infinity if we agree that -infinity + m = -infinity
When dividing one polynomial by another, if the divisor is of degree 0 (i.e., a nonzero constant), this simplifies the analysis of the quotient and remainder, as it ensures the degree of the divisor is always well-defined.
I must take a break off abstract linear algebra and go study abstract algebra, I think.
Is that a good move?
it depends how necessary is abstract algebra to linear algebra , do what you enjoy doing !
Closed by @fringe blade
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
For complex number, alpha and beta, when
____
alpha * beta == 2
, _____
alpha + (1 / alpha) == 3i
What is the value of
____
beta / 2 + 2 / beta
?
do you have a picture? looks like very poor formatting here
Given complex numbers a and b such that $a\overline{b} = 2$ and $a + \frac{1}{\overline{a}} = 3i$. Find the value of $\frac{b}{2} + \frac{2}{\overline{b}}$.
differential Towametry (Towa)
write a= 2/ bconjugate. replace a by b in the second equation from the first.
take conjugate of the first equation and similarly replace a conjugate.
@undone quest Has your question been resolved?
how does everyone know fluent korean wtf
It would only be a == 2 / (a b with bar)
can u translate pls?
is this the right translation?
When two complex numbers alpha , beta exists and alpha * (a beta with bar) == 2 and alpha + 1 / (an alpha with bar) == 3i
Find the value of beta / 2 + 2 / (a beta with bar)
((an alpha with bar) and (a beta with bar) is KyeolLaeBokSsoSu of alpha and beta each)
sans do you know how to express y' = y in terms of dy/dx
Is it 1` == 1 by division?
ok in the second equation write 1/a(bar)= a/(|a|^2)
Or does the symbol ` has something else I don't know
y' means derivative
..
No idea how the abs function appeared
its a property
u can try ur self
a.(a with bar)=|a|^2
But the abs function does not work on complex numbers
the abs of a complex number is the distance of the complex number from origin
thats the meaning of abs function
in argand plane an complex number x+iy will have the cord (x,y)
so the abs value of said complex number will be (x^2+y^2)^1/2
Is it simplified to (x² + y²) / 2 ?
no sqrt of (x^2+y^2)
@undone quest Has your question been resolved?
apologies for the intrusion
uhm
@undone quest is this a competetive programin thing
or r u jus doin maths
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
solve using similarity / bpt/ converse bpt please
ayy this came this year in the board exams didn't it
so, I'll tell you the first step
yea it did
draw a line frm D that's parallel to BY
Label the point it intersects with AC as Z or whatever
that'll give you your solution pretty fast
whatever you did yesterday followed by drawing a line from Y parallel to AD
insane for a board question though
@flat moon Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @flat moon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
u think its tough
aswell
no one was able to solve it
in our whole class
their whole class
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
ABCD is a rhombus and P, Q, R and S are the mid-points of the sides AB, BC, CD and DA, respectively. Show that the quadrilateral PQRS is a rectangle.
Is there any other way to prove that the angles of the quadrilateral pqrs is 90°
Other than using the perpendicular diagonals property of the rhombus
<@&286206848099549185> help me guys
!15min
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
anyways what do you use to prove PQRS is a rectangle?
Lemme send you a photo
If you prove the diagonals of the quadrilateral are equal on top of there being equal opposite sides, it is enough to prove it is a rectangle i think
midpoint theorem is the first thing that comes to my mind ngl
Well i also wanted to ask if to prove a rhombus do we have to prove all the sides as equal
how about proving PQRS is a parallelogram first
and then prove one of the angles are 90
Once you have that it is a parallelogram, you can prove it's diagnals are equal instead of proving angles are 90
I think it is easier
I mean idk
well
we have multiple ways
one way is that 2 pairs of sides are equal
i meant parallel
Closed by @white pendant
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
But does it make sense intuitively that it is true to you?
Sorry my internet is very bad
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Heres my working i dont know how to continue the second sum i posted this before but the bot auto closed the help
<@&286206848099549185>
Hello
I need help with dumb math 😅
Generating response
do u know the addition of two exponential random variables is another exponential random variable?
Yes
just calculate cumulative distribution function of X1 + X2
Thats not the question tho
Noah
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
you'll see a pattern
T_n is the sum of exponentials
But then u want K_m
Which is the sum of T_n
Up to m
$\sum^{n}_{i=1}$
All i need to do is compute the var of k_m the distribution of t_n isnt necessary
Noah
Km is the sum of Tns bruh
Yea but u dont need to find the distribution of t_n
To find var of k_m
u need to
No?
No
Var(sum) = sum i=1 to n of var + 2 * double sum i<j of cov
All i need help with is computing my second sum
Which im not sure how to do
k my brain is not functioning properly
Only thing I can think of is using the fact that Cov(X,Y) = E(XY) - E(X)E(Y) but idk how would that help
They gave a hint
Im just not sure how u use it
Cov(x,x+y)=var(x)+cov(x,y)
Maybe they want you to show T_n and T_i is also independent so you get Cov(T_n,T_i) = 0?
is T_n and T_i always independent?
They're both sums of independent exponentials
Hmm yeah, I'm currently procrastinating my ass in tutor while looking at this so I can't give much thought 😭
But I do think it might be that
Hmm ok
😭
No wait it cant be independent since if T_1=X_1 then T_2 literally contains T_1 =X_1+X_2
@split sluice Has your question been resolved?
@split sluice Has your question been resolved?
Yo can someone help me like hello
Okay, i'm back. I think I managed to get it. Let me just write it down (might take a while though)
🙏
Thx for coming back lol
yeah my tutorial just finished
I decided to make K_m be rewritten in terms of X_i as it's useful since X_i variables are independent. This isn't the full solution I came up with, just a hint.
excuse the big ass shadow though 😭
though my solution didn't use the fact that cov(x, x+y) = var(x) + cov(x,y)
it did use i^2 identity though
Wait so how would i find the var from this
Its fine lol 😭
I didn't think abt writing k_m as X_i's hmmm
Would it be sum i=1 to m of the bracket squared* var(x_i)
Alr ill try it one sec
But yeah as you said T_n can't be independent so I made it into x_i terms
Yea thats smart ima try when i get home thx
Hopefully i get the same answer as the markscheme
Alright nice, good luck with it though
Closed by @split sluice
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what does this question mean? and how do you solve the 3rd one?
You're supposed to find eigenvectors y of P and show that Py are eigenvectors of A
And also eigen vectors of PAP^-1
Sorry for you this looks tedious
This is what i understood at least
wait... IT'S THAT LONG?? first finding P inverse after that eigen vector of P? and then find eigen vectors of A???
I mean there do be a formula to find the inverse of 2×2 matrices but i don't remember it
i found the gauss inverse to be easier than finding determinant and adj of matrix
Idk what that means but if it works it works
Don't hesitate to ask quastions if you struggle
chaos
@outer dagger Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @outer dagger
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Does anyone knows Maths?
-# this is a math server so 99% of us knows math
maths? hardly know her
why are you whispering?
I don't think anyone does. Those guys like Pythagoras, Thales, Euclid just tried acting cool by making stuff up
Any one know how to learn maths

learn by understanding
you start from numbers
you should understand why those rules work
I want to make stuff up like them
What's stopping you
they used existing rules to make them
you can even make up new rules and from that you can make more rules
if you wanted to
1m = 0.001 b
that's why boolean algebra was born
I am billionaire I have $ 0.00000000000001b
i dont think this is helping...
@fierce harbor Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i need help with this question
im not use to the wording
let's try question 6 first
a fixed cost here, is just like the starting point
imagine you're on a taxi
then you would have a starting cost, for example $15
that $15 is the fixed cost
yes
and the cost that is proportional to blah blah blah
that is the initial value
that's like how much more money is being added for each kilometer
or miles if you're in usa
yeah
1 divided by 0 equals Infinity
right
I remember talking to u 1 year ago
uhm
U helped me 1 year ago
so far we got t as something
1 divided by 0 equals Infinity
right
so then the cost of making $x$ soap is?
1 divided by 0 equals Infinity
it costs 2
if there's no initial cost, it would be $xc$
2 bucks
1 divided by 0 equals Infinity
i am?
well we assumed the initial cost was $t$
1 divided by 0 equals Infinity
so the total cost is?
1 divided by 0 equals Infinity
first question done
1 divided by 0 equals Infinity
$2$ is a different story
1 divided by 0 equals Infinity
it's the cost of SELLING each bar
@inner sierra my wifi turned off im back
for the first information, you can plug in $x = 800$ and for the second information, you can plug in $x = 300$
1 divided by 0 equals Infinity
wdym one is positive and other is negative?
1 divided by 0 equals Infinity
2nd info it was derived from $y - 80 = 2(300)$
1 divided by 0 equals Infinity
ohhh
@slim ibex Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
.reopen
hey I’m trying to figure out what the last line is saying
does anyone have an idea?
z is in b?
oops before that
Also z in y, and y. in b, ????, => z in b
ordinal smth
i thought it said so alpha ordered but like tht doesnt make sense since alpha is already claimed to be an ordinal
also this step kindof confuses me
oh ig its not that confusing
we need to show z, y, b are elements of alpha, and we know alpha is an ordinal so the elements of alpha are transitive, We already claimed z in y and y in b, so because of this, z in b
then b is transitive
maybe they mean "so alpha ordinal implies z in b"
as opposed to "so alpha ordinal, and therefore z in b"
Closed by @zenith crest
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What is the span of an arch?
what's an arch
I don't see no span
oh wait do you just mean the distance between the two endpoints?
or is there some algebra thing Im unaware of 
@hidden dove Has your question been resolved?
Uhh my board exam asked me as there is a bridge
Adjust like this
are you in 10th?
And it give me points
Yeah
I heard the exam was cooked
!original
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
(-288.5,0) and (288.5,0) as the end of radius of semicircle
And it asked the span of arch
It gave concepts of class 11 and even the Google can't solve
A picture or screenshot is best
Yess wait
I mean google can solve it 
I believe they just asked the distance between the two endpoints
Span of arch means this dude
I did that
you did that?
Can you answer (i)
That's what the students are saying
It is out of syllabus
Answer (i)
yeah so they probably meant distance between endpoints no?
Yess maybe
😔
..
to solve 1 u can just use that vertex formula
they teach
it's in book
!noans
The purpose of this server is to help you learn; please don't ask for direct answers. Ask for guidance, explanations, or feedback instead.
this thing
Parabola is not in topic😭
Shitt got mark 1 cut
otherwise you can use symmetry ig
u see how they gave endpoints?
Bro in (i) I used logic as taking o is midpoint
I answer it (0.288.5)
Why
cause it's -238.5 and 228.5
so it's off centre
true midpoint is further to the left than 0
at -5
Literally the fucking cnse
Cnse
Cbse
I left 4 marks in their hand and
These case studies are also wrong
OMG😭😭
I mean they're not wrong..
Why
But this type of questions are not in any book
And it suddenly appears in exam we just got hyper and thought wrong
🥲
I do feel like not labelling the parts of an arch was a bit scummy on their part
If I didn't know vertex formula then how can I find the coordinates
Is cbse mad or what
symmetry then right
u did it yourself
I mean you got it wrong
but like you had the right idea
Yess
Still I can't find Y coordinates of A
why
I can just find X
Where?
y=p(x)
Fuck😭
No functions
Yes
usually they cover concept of a function there
No
just the basics
Not at all bro
No brother
they do, depends on the school
It's extra knowledge
how else would you graph stuff
Depends on cbse syllabus
do you have coordinate geometry in 10th?
Like there is no functions basic
Yess there is just distance and section formula
And no other things right there
Getting my point?
yeah i just checked ncert and there isn't anything about the function notation
Yess bro
That's what I'm saying
so it is unfair
🙂
Like even I studied for jee advanced from 9th i know some fucktions but forgot them
skell
As not revised since 6 months
U in which class
10th bro
yeah if you'd revised u would have got that question
Cool jee 2028 aspirant?
But I didn't thought cbse would make me feel like beggar of marks
Right! Got admission in allen kota
they should make the papers percentile based
how was the maths exam lol
Fucking bad bro
demm broo all the best yrr tske care
lol
so if a paper is hard your overall grade doesn't look worse
,redir
Today is english literature exam
I didn't even slept
fok the thing doesn't work
yea lol
why are you discussing math then 😭
Thanks
sleep gng
!redir
This channel is only for on-topic discussion. Please take casual conversation to #discussion or #chill.
This ^
Bcz itnis striking my mins
<@&268886789983436800>
gg
This isn't the right place to spam videos here
fr
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
.close
Closed by @hidden dove
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Im a bit confused from the statement underlined in red
I drew the blue and red arcs to maybe see if thats what they mean
if the answer you got was for example 3pi/2 you are instead supposed to say -pi/2
I see
but the question is saying find theta between 90 degrees and -90 degrees if cos(theta)=-1/sqrt(2)
between -180 degrees and 180 degrees
ah right yes
so practically its from 0 to 360 degrees
its actually hard to visualise it from a unit cirlce, do I need to use a graph?
also I assume ive drawn the unit cirlce correctly
@steel night Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
@spice trellis Has your question been resolved?
Can you work with complex numbers
oh nvm i suppose its not very helpful, my idea was to use roots to get a contradiction but there just too many options
probably just compare the coefficients then
oh it works
If you want a hint on how to work with this:
||Suppose r is a root, using the equation, what else is a root?||
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
one sec
can u send it as an image
im not sure about your base case
let the neighbours of the removed vertex be u and v
you want to apply the induction hypothesis
do you allow loops in your graphs like that?
in the definitions in my notes, for 'regular', and 'connected', it doesnt say anything about it needing to be simple
right now d(u) = d(v) = 1 and also you need some way to argue that the graph remains connected, can you see a quick way to get two birds with one stone
so, theres the possibility that u and v may already have an edge between them
hmm actually you may want to assume m > 2 so you don't end up with the degenerate case where u = v
ok
you could add an edge between the two?
which results in k edges
but what about what i said here ..
and also in a 2-regular graph, importantly
there is no problem with that
since you allow multigraphs, you can adjoin a distinct edge to the one that already exists
ok
otherwise if you're working with simple graphs your base case would be |G| = 3 anyway
In that case, the only way that could happen is if these 3 vertices (including the removed) one were in a triangle and weren't connected to anything else, so that contradicts connectedness
but isnt a triangle connected?
so how does that contradict connectedness?
did you mean to reply to them
connectedness to other vertices
yes sry mb
oh ok
For simple graphs, we would have m = 3 as a base case and then m > 3 for the induction, so there is 4th vertex to which that triangle wouldnt be connected
understood
Is there anything else required? Do we not still need to show that the graph with K + 1 edges is a cycle?
acc no that would be impossible right
since that doesnt make it 2 regular anymore
You should probably add something, yeah. At least sth like "Reversing the process, we can see that G is also a cycle"
wdym?
to reconstruct G from H, you would remove that edge and replace it with the edge-vertex-edge (the ones that were removed)
And that will obviously still be a cycle
idk if im tripping but if u have a 2 regular graph with k edges, surely adding an extra edge to make it k+1 would not make it 2 regular anymore
since two of the degrees would increase
its not adding an edge, you have to reverse the construction
When you went from G to H, you first removed a vertex and its edges and then added an edge between the neighbors
Now to go from H to G, we reverse the process
no but im saying that how does these starting lines make sense. if u have a 2 regylar graph with k edges, then how can u have a 2-regylar graph with k+1 edges. because the degree of two vetrices will increase by 1 by adding an additional edge
we remove that added edge, and add the 2 edges and the original vertex back in
nvm worded that poorly
youll add a new edge
that increases the number of edges by 1
yes
but youll also add a new vertex
you have to add it by first removing an edge, and then putting the vertex in between that
not just randomly append it
you're subdividing one of the edges
take a look at this (read it in reverse if you want)
ohh ok
sure yes that makes better sense
thanks
ok so if we reverse the process
ie
remove the edge, add the removed vertex back along with its two edges, we create a bigger cycle
hence G is a cycle
and that concludes the proof
To ask for mathematics help on this server, please open your own help channel or help thread. See #❓how-to-get-help for instructions.
Closed by @shell oar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
. @marble laurel you can ask your quesiton here now
do you know anything about infinite geometric series? (mainly the formula a/(1-r))
can you send your progress?
I thought it goes to infinity
oh okay
i wouldnt do that
1+x+x^2+x^3 appears in a certain algebraic identity
are you familiar with the x^n - 1 factorizations?
well then its probably the right time to learn about that
try multiplying it by (x-1) and see what happens
here is the identity btw
indeed
try using it to simplify the fraction
simplify is kind of subjective here, but just express it in a slightly different form that you think could be useful, so that we get rid of that long 1 + x + x^2 + x^3
Using power series after no?
yeah
not quite
(x-1)(1 + x + x^2 + x^3) = (x^4-1)
dont forget that (x-1)
and dont factor x^4 - 1 for now
no, its correct like this i think)
$\frac{1}{1+x+x^{2}+x^{3}}=\frac{1}{\frac{x^{4}-1}{x-1}}=\frac{1-x}{1-x^{4}}$
MathIsAlwaysRight
okay now it looks slightly more like the geo series formula
what is the question
mb bro u solve this guy's doubt but i want to know the q.
integrals?
.
check pins
thx boss
do you know what i mean by this?
binomial i believe but i shall no longer talk further. mathisalwaysright is goated
can it be done via binomial? i honestly dont see how, but maybe im just blind lol
i have encountered a similar problem of this sort (i forgot) but they did it via binomial.
If it went to infinity it could be solved with binomial
I thought that at first
wouldnt that be just 1/(1/(1-x)) = 1-x (the function)?
im not sure it has to go to inf
but ig it can be solved with binomial.
idk, gimme a sec
Split into fractions
dont give the ans.
im pretty sure math left it like that for bro to figure it out.
math gv it like that for him to figure it out
It should work like this as well, though i too originally intended it to be split
ik this may be stupid as heck but @trim portal if i diff it first, then 2nd time, then third then i may find a patter right
that may help
1/(1-x)
If I remember correctly, 1+x+x^2+x^3+.... Is (1-x)^-1
||eventh derivative of an odd function is zero at 0||
yeah, so 1/ that is gonna be 1/(1-x)^-1 = 1-x
is it so?
Easy to prove
Oh yeah I I got confused lol
not as deep in maths as yall
if only it was odd
It is gonna be 0 then
One part of the fraction is, if you split
Kinda fancy ngl
any itegration sums
well, true. Or you can just get the series explicitly, it shouldnt matter. It's just
||1-x + x^4-x^5 + x^8-x^9 + ...||
GENIUS
you just need the expansion for the left part of the fraction! ||since the right fractions derivative is 0||
1+x^4+x^8+…
Now you can just read off the derivative at 0
Perfect
np, i noticed the 1 + x + x^2 + x^3 and immidiately remembered the expansion (when u see sth like this, 99% of time you're gonna use it). When I tried plugging it in, i got that simple (x-1) / (x^4 - 1) and that looked like it could be solved with power series quite easily
the cruicial steps were noticing that expansion and then using power series
Closed by @marble laurel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how many attempts do you have
what have you tried
this is not really a maths problem is it
no, its a guessing problem
one picture cant be enough to guess what they mean
i'd literally just try numbers around 10 one by one
okay im blind then
count triangles
ah, i didnt think of the big one
infinite
try this then
random numbers above 15
unfortunate choice of a first guess
@green lintel Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @green lintel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
guys is this correct or is ts question done in some other way
is this a question off a youtube thumbnail titled "oxford entrance exam" with an einstein pic on it?
no
<@&286206848099549185>
Ig u can make a square inside the sqrt
huh
I also thought so, but seems not to work
so is it not answerable
Because 50 = 49 + 1 = 7² + 1 but there's that √6
Mhm ye
,w calc sqrt(50 + 14√6)
Failed to get a response from Wolfram Alpha.
If the problem persists, please contact support.
https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=sqrt(50+%2B+14√6) seems not, indeed 🤷♂️
i see ty
.close
Closed by @weak tinsel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone tell me what to think when i see a question like this
express the logarithm in terms of P, Q and R
In general, what is $\log{\left(\frac{A}{B}\right)}$ equal to?
Alberto Z.
the first thing I'd think is to see why the Find part has a 7 which didnt appear in the previous conditions.
which may have some trick on the 7 when using the specific based log
Umm
someone here good with calculus?
Log a + log b?
log a - logb
you can go to the (available) help channels
I think he meant for me
and ask my doubt there?
yes e.g. #help-33 is okay now
ok thank you
If you're not good with your log properties yet, keep a table of properties in front of you. You don't need to guess at them, you need to memorize them.
I know it i just have a problem with a question like this
U see this one is pretty easy
But
yea?
yea
Yea but the other one idk where did the 7 came from
think why 7 appears with log base 7
Okay why
hmm... lets say log base 10
Okay
what is log_(10) 10
1
1
there we go
yep
Okay and which is it
oh well, it's your turn
with log base 7,
log(7/9)=log7-log9=1-log9
which is?
C
HAAAAA
WAIT I FORGOT
ABOUT THE
when the 7s cancel each other it will equal to 1
Is it not true?
Okay
$y=\log_a x$ is like asking what number $y$ is needed so that $a^y=x$
Biscuity
e.g.
Yeaa okay ik that property
$\log_2 16$ is asking $2^?=16$
Biscuity
4
so basically $\log_a a$ is asking $a^?=a$
Biscuity
1
that's the reason
Wait wait i dont get it
so $\log_7 7 =1$
Biscuity
or $\log_6 6 =1$