#help-10
1 messages · Page 423 of 1
Yeah natural number
But that is a numerical method isn't it
Brute force
it gives an exact answer in a finite amount of time, if such x exists
but yes, it is brute force
Isn't there an algebraic way
without knowing anything about f you cant make a better algorithm
even knowing f, if you cant even evaluate the sum without actually summing it step by step, you are out of luck
this is also a problem
sometimes you may be able to find precise asymptotic bounds which are good enough
So it's impossible to have a nonpiecewise nonnumerical algorithm
but those would depend highly on f
depends on f
but there isn't a general algorithm that could solve the problem for any f
I dont wanna say impossible cause maybe there is a smart way, but I would doubt it
hmm
Maybe something involving calculus
f could be any computable function
Let's say domain is reals
Just for simplicity
Oh wait there is a formula for polynomials
isnt the domain naturals? since i is always gonna be a natural number
Uhh yeah
and you only need f(i)
well, if the domain of f is the real numbers then you can do some tricks like approximating the sum with an integral
You're looking for an algorithm that has K and f as inputs and returns x, right?
And range is real
Yeah
if that bound is good enough it does actually allow you to solve for x
but it will depend very highly on how nice f is
in general this will not work
f is an input to the algorithm
Yes
there is no way that an alg that can solve this exists
do you realize how truly disgusting a general function f could be?
even if you assume that f is continuous or even smooth I doubt this will be possible
f's domain is naturals
powers are some of the nicest functions ever
and look how difficult even there the closed form is
I doubt this would be any helpful to actually solve
sum = K
and then it still amounts to solving a polynomial of high degree, which is quite literally impossible in general
Well I actually came up with this q just by thinking if theres a way to get such algorithm for f(x)=1/x!
maybe its possible here because of the very precise form of the polynomials but that would require quite a bit of research I would guess
so the actual problem is solving
1 + 1 + 1/2! + 1/3! + ... + 1/n! = K?
that might be possible because error bounds for e are very well studied probably
Yeah basically e
We start with I=0 so you get 1+1+1/2+1/6...
Additional 1
well still not easy. anyway, gtg. good luck
Thanks
do you always have a guarantee that a solution exists?
This is a specific case I wanted to come up with, yeah, but that general case is also a q I would like a response to
general case is impossible
For this you don't need to use brute force i believe
you could probably bound
$\sum_{i = n+1}^\infty \frac{1}{i!}$
MæthIsAlwaysRight
i meant more like finding a reasonable estimate for it
wait, i got an idea...
i just need to try it out rq
😯
nvm i probably dont
You could maybe define a function such that it's the function that provides the solution to this
But thats not a good answer
if you could find an n that's an upper bound on x, then you could make O(log(n)) algorithm
Still numerical
so you want O(1) algorithm?
Algorithm doesn't necessarily mean a numerical one; it's a process which I can apply to said equation to find the answer.
Like solving ax=c. The algorithm is to move a to the other side (divide by a)
My goal isnt to compute a specific value of K, but find how to do it for any K. And a guess-until-found doesn't satisfy me Truly, nor, I believe, many mathematicians
Because say a geometric series has a formula for sum up to nth term
Is there such a formula for when the ratio isn't constant, but part of harmonic series
straight up, no. there are sometimes bounds but thats literally it
even for the harmonic series itself there are only bounds
But wait, if harmonic series sum itself doesn't have a proper formula then a good guess is that
Yeah
you could use those bounds to speed up your search, but that's pretty much it
Hmm
Well the bottom of the fraction of harmonic series is n! If unsimplified
But what about the top
the top would be some ugly sum
sum of i! up to n! i believe
or sth like that
no
$\frac{\sum_{i=1}^{n}\frac{n!}{i}}{n!}$
MæthIsAlwaysRight
MæthIsAlwaysRight
it cant be simplified
@manic moon Has your question been resolved?
It can
It can be simplified a d that's the problem
Take n! Outside the sum and the n! Cancel, so no progress made
@manic moon hm what about taylor formula with integral rest ?
no problem!
u know this formula ?
how will it help...?
uh, and wheres the sum part
the one with the ...
ok, but here i need to find n?
so its the same as finding x in a sum from i=0 to x of f(i) that equals K?
where f(x)=exp
that could be good for this
it is just an idea, idk if it will work yet
n is increment
ill find an expression that use the sigma notation
i found this
so we divide K by e to get n! ?
uh wait, u want to solve for K or for n in this ?
1 + 1 + 1/2! + 1/3! + ... + 1/n! = K
yeah, find n
and K is a number u choose ?
take out n!
yeah
then u cant, because th sum of 1/k! tend to e, so if K>e u cant have this equality
what?
for example
with your provided equation, no
but that doesnt mean its impossible generally
if K<e its ok
well yes
i never said K>e
by the way, can i find people in this server who are willing to teach me, i. e. not help with specific problems, or answers, but teach me in order, mathematics?
i mean
you can use a whiteboard
for visuals
and text is the same as speaking except visuals
anyway it is not convenient, but the main probleme is probably the time needed to teach
<@&268886789983436800>
it would be more adapted by private message i think
too late
you probably wont find anyone willing to teach entire math topics
ye
if someone is willing to do that theyll charge money for it
no one will become your free personal tutor
come on, out of 200K
books are ..
well i know some stuff already there
so i dont want to read i t again
but then i skip stuff i might not know, if i choose to skip those topics
we get way fewer than 200k people checking this server on any given day (closer to a couple thousand). furthermore, most of them are not qualified to help you. it is highly unlikely you will find someone willing to do charity work for you among those who remain, considering that personal tutoring is usually a (fairly well paid) job
my home city has 1 million people, but if i go into public and start asking for $100, no one's gonna give it to me
i dont need extremely qualified
people
just so they understand the concept themselves
i think you fail to realize what a huge effort and time sink it is to be a personal tutor
i don't know how to explain to you that people usually don't work for free for people they dont know
ok, like?
unless you're targeting some highly esoteric branch
i would like specific examples of sources of enlightenment on YouTube
for wich language ?
language? english is ok
except for a few syntax differences, math is the same everywhere
say calculus
i dont know what there is to learn
i know some stuff already\
but i dont know what im missing out
you could try khanacademy or mit opencourseware
anyway u can still ask mods for channel for courses
i already pinged them
so channel for courses?
i dont know what this means
ask @timid silo
but thats for specific problems
no...
none of our channels are meant to teach courses
and thats the reason for the existence of the suggestion
yes i though of making new ones
oh wait math-pedagogy is kind of that ? by the name, im figuring?
having such a channel requires volunteers, probably paid, to run it
which goes back to the point on effort, time, and money
volunteers and paid dont go in one sentence
im not sure this is within scope of the server in any case
usually is the key...\
i though it would still be the same principe, like the questions channels. Pepole help for free here
we are a mathematics server, we're not trying to recreate a school
math server cant have math courses?
no, that channel is for discussions about how to teach mathematics on a broad scale
yeah, i saw by this point already
i mean, if you can find a miracle group of trustworthy people willing to commit to a project like this, let us know
somehow i doubt youll have much success
"usually" as in "you would be astronomically lucky to find one"
just because we're a mathematics server doesn't mean we facilitate literallyt everything mathematical
well i like to teach people when i have the time and will stuff i know and they dont
we do not run a mathematics journal and we do not run a mathematics school
we provide a space for the broad discussion of math and for asking and answering questions
as well as some off-topic social spaces
but the name is Mathematics, suggesting the broader implication of the word, that encompasses different mathematical stuff
i dont even know how to respond to that
i'd like to think that we satisfy the most obvious implications of "general-purpose mathematics discord server"
and would it be possible to try creating others channels, and after, see if it works ?
if you want to run an experiment like this you can make your own server and try it
could still delete it after
becaus it is already a big server
experimenting is the way to perfection
but ok
what is the problem
so you want to leech off us for your pet project?
hm yes ?
alright, maybe we should resort to my previous question
why not just make a channel, make a few roles, and try seeing what happens
its not like the server is gonna get hacked. .. ..
he said it is a lot of work
i mean, maybe there can be no rules, and the rules will be implied by the name of the channel
this would be a nightmare to moderate
except for other stuff that aplies to the server as a whole
i dont see how that would end up any different from #calculus or similar topic channels
the reason the topic channels are filled with questions is because thats the most common type of activity
you can hold general conversations in them if you want
and indeed people do frequently in the advanced channels like #foundations and #math-pedagogy
eh, 1 problem vs topics, examples, ways to understand,, ,
you can already ask for that stuff in the topic channels?
you could just ask about these things
general conversations doesnt include learning a topic continuosly, or does it?
i think u should elaborate more the things u want before proposing it
i dont see how you enforce that without a large moderation effort
well, id argue we should get back to my previous Q because its fading away in history
it was your idea, i was only helping you
yes, it was for the teaching stuff
alright, could you just tell me what the moderation effort mostly consists of because i might be in misunderstanding
hello
well hello there?
by far the bulk of our moderation activity on the server is trying to corral people into using the help channels the proper way
we have spent thousands of collective manhours trying to make it as clear as possible
and we still get people posting their questions in the wrong sections
by chance do you know synthetic division?
after this long conversation i still dont 100% understand what distinguishes your proposal from #calculus
so i would imagine the average server user would be totally lost
oh, is it not possible to use some AI bot that filters messages based on content, or does that not really exist
that would be very expensive to run and would probably not work very well
a bit'
please get your own help channel, see #❓how-to-get-help
this demonstrates your point very clearly i see
.
crunchy
@manic moon Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what are you stuck on?
How do I check if ps is parallel to qr
try angle chasing and see the (idk what its called) but the "rules" for parallel lines
Closed by @feral parcel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help me understand the farmat's last theorem?
it only says that there is no solution $a^n + b^n = c^n$ with n > 2 and n, a, b and c are natural numbers
FluxusX2
@stable briar
Im not sure but i would say it can be true for some cases but it does not count in general
@stable briar Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @stable briar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
guys
...?
@pallid linden pls ask your doubt
No need to ask “Can I ask…?” or “Does anyone know about…?”—it’s faster for everyone if you just ask your question! See https://dontasktoask.com/
@pallid linden Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what did they do to the end? i got the ln(2)/0.06=t
i get that they are putting it in measurement of a year but how can i do it in my head
nvm
.close
Closed by @junior hull
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Could someone help me with b)
And explain how you got to the answer
@hollow void Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
<@&286206848099549185>
@hollow void Has your question been resolved?
@hollow void Has your question been resolved?
@hollow void Has your question been resolved?
@hollow void what have you tried?
simple google search would tell you how to do the intervals right?
so is there a more specific problem here?
@hollow void Has your question been resolved?
i havent tried anything simply because Im not sure what it is
well what you have to put in the box are properties
you can google for examples and see how to measure them
there are so many youtube tutorials for measuring sign and slope too
it's all out there
maybe try something and come back, we can see how you did
alright, its pretty late where I am could I close the ticket and dm u in the morning my results?
or, ill keep it open whichever u want
I think you can leave it open
okay
@hollow void Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
More in depth
Quotient rule + Chain rule + product rule
Using logarithmic differentiation (I didn’t do it that way) is the one closest to my answer my best is that they factored out (3x-1)^4 ?
Looks like the calculator expanded the final expression
and logarithmic differentiation would be faster and easier
yup, havent dont logarithmic diff yet and isnt in the scope for the midterm
so my answer is correct then..... simplifying that would take a long time
yup but just recheck if you think you messed up something
checked multiple times, even did the chain rule part seperately lol thrice should be good i believe
Then yup you should be all set
Closed by @golden basalt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
need help with a math question pleaseeee
if x is an element of Z
when is x^2 ~2x +6 also an element of Z
how do you do this lol 😭
Im not really sure what are you asking. What is ~?
ouh sory
it's meant to be a minus sign
I'm trying to translate from french and I have problems sometimes inputting symbols
So if you have a number from Z abd you put it in the quadratic, what do you get?
wdym?
Z as in the set of whole numbers right?
Okay I see
Basically, if you take a whole number and you plug it in this, you need to figure out when is the fraction a whole number
yeah but how do you do that, aren't you not supposed to just plug in each number over and over?
So what I would do is set this equation equal for some whole y, and then try to get to a quadratic equation when one of the parameters is y
Closed by @cinder relic
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
,rccw
can someone check if I got it right
yes, but 3/3 can be simplified
Closed by @misty meteor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can anybody tell me if this is correct?
@ivory trout Has your question been resolved?
@ivory trout Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how to solve
i am not sure where to start with this
What are you solving for
You want to put all the y terms and x term’s together
So you can change the roots into y to the power of something
Then add the powers
Yes
but how do i express that on discord for the radicand
What do you mean
its y^(5/4)
that's how you write it? and it means the same as
Yes
okay
The root is in denominator of exponent and power is in numerator of exponent
Always
And another property of roots is that rt(ab) = rt(a) * rt(b)
So you can separate the third term into x^(10/4) times y^(15/4)
Then lastly you add the powers y
So the simplified term is y^(3 + 5/4 + 15/4) times x^(10/4)
Or y^8 times x^5/2
test
i am sorry i had to go for a second
am I going in the right direction?
<@&286206848099549185>
okay i am not sure where i go from here
Closed by @bright bobcat
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im really stuck and not sure what to do. can someone help me go step by step for this question? thanks
So we can already kinda prove this
Wait i misread nvm. It just takes a couple steps though
ok, thanks
The way I did it, was that because CAB and CBA are congruent, and a part of each of theirs are congruent, the other part of each must be congrunt to each other
ok, i have to show every single step to make it work
are there only 3?, i feel like there is more
@forest roost Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Help?
Hola
What with
I got a question about linear equations
Ok
y = mx + b
i need to give an example to show you what I am confused with
lets make two plots on a graph
y = 3x + 5
y = 3(1) + 5 = 8
y = 3(2) + 5 = 11
my question is about the slope
Ok
The plot gives us 3/1
Yeah
I want to understand how the y-intercept and slope connect with the graph. When I do the work I can verify that it is the slope, I want to understand why.
i had a hard time formulating this question
Its like, how would I make sense of y = mx + b
No problem.
The y intercept is what the value for Y is when x=0. If x = 0 in the question you sent, then we have
y=3×(0)+5, or y=5
Its like I know the how I really didn’t grasp the why yet if you don’t know what i’m saying lol
When x is zero, looking at the origin, its where it touches in the y axis right? Its why its called an intercept.
But what I didn’t really understand is the slope
The slope is how much y changes when x increases by 1
In your equation, when x increases by 1, y increases by 3
dude snatches purses
It does yes, but you can think of it like an initial value. Kinda like where the function begins
Notice how
y=3x+5 and
y=3x+2 have the same slope of 3. But they're at different locations on the graph because of that y intercept
I feel as though you are about to help me make a groundbreaking moment
About to
So the y-intercept doesn’t necessarily impact the rate of change, all it does it as you said place it somewhere else on the graph
Exactly
You are very welcome
Is there a way to say that with more clarity for my notes?
Its so that if I forget I can relearn easily
The best way I can think to say it is that the y intercept is where the graph is located when x=0
The graph itself will go up or down, based on what the y intercept is. The bigger that +b value, the higher on an x-y plane it is. Vice versa for the more negative that plus b value
Oh another question, how do you know if the rate of change is increasing or decreasing
Based on the function
second derivative
for example going up and down a graph
concavity
second derivative being?
the derivative of the first derivative
Are you in calculus
oh you’re in algebra
^
Yeah don't worry about derivative rn haha
concave up -> rate is increasing, concave down -> rate is decreasing
Definitely useful for that
Analyzing the data, but thats irrelevant to this
So slope is determined by the coefficient of x because it directly impacts y.
y = 3x
3 / 1 = 3
Correct
Correct
I have one more question if you have the time
Yes
So I know linear functions are constant but what about different types of functions. Ones that make a U shape etc
You'll actually learn about this in calculus if you decided to take it. Let's look at a "U shaped" graph, being a quadratic equation. I'll just go simple with y=x^2
Exponential graph?
One thing about non linear equations is that they have something called a "tangent line" at each specific point
at the origin?
A tangent line is a line that touches a graph at exactly one spot
It could be anywhere, including the origin
the same spot on the y axis?
Here's an example
You can kinda see how the linear equation only ever touches the quadratic at that one spot
Yep tangent
Oh its tangent
What about when it never touches it and it seems as though it is the same as a linear graph
It started with an A I believe
Asymdote something like that
Asymptote?
There it is
But whenever I hear about these different types of functions i’m just lost
I don’t know what I’m looking at basically lol
Yeah lemme finish my rant rq
So anyway
What we would say here, is that at that point of x=1, we would say that the graph has a slope of positive 2, as given by the equation. But that slope of 2 will never be seen again anywhere else on the graph, because it's only ever tangent at x=1
Here's a different point with a different slope
At x=-1, the graph has a slope of -2
Hopefully this isn't too much
Is it because when x is squared it can never have more than one similar point with a linear graph. Say x is 10 it’d be 100. It follows a pattern indifferent to a linear one.
I guess I can understand, I haven’t grasped the basics all that much yet other than y = mx + b
Yeah this kind of stuff is what you would learn in calculus
Not quite. It's actually what we mentioned earlier, finding the derivative
The main point I'm getting at is that non linear equations, like quadratic or exponential, have different slopes at each point on the graph
Can you elaborate on the different slopes?
Those are trigonometric functions and they could potentially be related, but those are functions mainly used with triangles and the unit circle
The angles of a triangle I think
Yeah. Remember what I showed up above, when x=-1, the slope of the equation of y=x^2 was -2. Because that's what the slope of the tangent line was. But when x=2, the slope was +2, again because that's what the slope of the tangent line was
Yeah
So in algebra 1 i’d just use a calculator for those functions
As long as I understand what it is i’m doing
I highly doubt they will ask you to find the slope of a non linear equation
Because this is higher level high school math
AP precalculus?
They might, that's a fairly new class but I wouldn't be surprised if they talked about this kind of stuff in it
Thanks for the help DoC
Of course
Thanks to you I have a somewhat better understanding
W
y + mx + b
b is the y-intercept (essentially the position of the line)
y and x are coordinate points that have a relationship with each other known as rate of change.
m is the slope because it determines the relationship between y and x.
Y / X
m affects y
Could you repeat how m is the reason for rate of change, or in other words is the rate of change
Hm
To be more specific i would say m is the slope and it determines the relationship between y and x
I see that
But m is the rate of change because it tells us how much y is changing whenever x increases
To put it figuratively, theres some fog and I can only see 4 miles through and I want to be able to see very clearly.
And y / x is the rate of change.
Kind of like distance/time
Yeah
30 mph
Mhm. That per is where the divisor is. M/h, miles divided by hours
so we’d substitute b for 0
Yea
What if there is no slope but there is a y intercept
Its not a function then?
y = x + 10
But it is possible for lines to be in the form
y=10
In this case, we'd say there's a 0 slope
y=0x+10, but since 0× anything is 0, we just get rid of 0x
Whenever there is a 0 slope, the line just goes completely horizontal
so x is 0
ohhhh so y = 10 infinitely
X can be whatever it wants, but it will always end up becoming 0
Yeah essentially
Technically there is no slope here
If x=4, y=10. If x=16, y=10. If x=193759504, y=10
Correct
How would a real life example result in that
Let's say you give away fliers for free. If you give away 50 fliers, how much money did you make
0
Yeah
So in this case, a product being free is represented by the slope being 0
You made 0 dollars per flier given away
When there is no slope in the equation is there an invisible 1 or 0?
Or is 0 the value of c
X*
y = x + 10
y = 1(x) + 10 or y = 0(x) + 10
When there's no slope in the equation there's an invisible x
No slope will always result in the form
y=b
If you at all see an x, that means there is a slope
This is when there's a slope of 1
slope determines the relation between x and y and where there is no slope there is no relation between them
its a horizontal line
Yeah that seems to work actually
Doesnt go up or down
Y is not dependant on x, we could say
Yep, on the y-intercept because it determines the position of the horizontal line
But i’m not quite sure why theres an invisible x
what if the prompt says x = 2
would that make it not a function?
Correct
How so?
I like to think about it this way
Let's say we have 5 people from ages 12-16, and we are measuring their heights.
Would you expect the 14 year old, for example, to have 2 different heights?
@warm depot sorry i was writing something else then realized it's too convoluted haha
No since there is only one 14 year old and he can not possibly have two heights simultaneously
Correct
Is this the climax towards the answer of the question, “So if there is no slope and x has a value is not a function why?”
So that's a sort of real world example.
In the math world, we could say that in every function, there should be exactly one output for each given input
Uh maybe
In order for it to be linear that is, or more importantly a function
Yep. For every single function, including quadratic, exponential, etc
That equation would exemplify a real-world scenario but it does not have a rate of change allowing for it to be graphed as a function
Yep
Certain applications such as desmos still allow these functions to be Graphed though
I think i’ll be using demos pretty soon
But we wouldn't necessarily call this a graph. It's just a bunch of ordered pairs put together
if x equals 4 wouldnt that mean y is equal to 4.
That shouldn’t be possible
Also y would be whatever b is plus x but that isn’t a function
Its just data outside of which can be used as a function
Yep, at one specific spot
But y is also equal to 5, 17, -32, -2747
Mhm
I don’t know what to say other than telling you the statistics. Nobody in my class learnt anything from him. He simply shows us the problem, assigns it, and grades it.
Yeah that's not a great way to teach
You have been very helpful, I learned a lot today
Great to hear
I’d argue you are overqualified to be a teacher lol
Oh I am a teacher lol
And a great one
I like tutoring for fun so I do this on the side because students rarely ask for help outside of class haha
I appreciate it
You're welcome. You as well
Know that you have a knack for this 🙂
So do I close this chat and say farewell
Goodbye 👋
.close
Closed by @warm depot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how would i go about deriving e^(x^(2)+tan(x)+x*cos(x))
chain rule
product rule
power rule
Closed by @round cosmos
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Woah oh someone call the popo
you’re not slick bro
I only saw 1 letter then disappeared
self promotion
i respect the hustle tho
dude really thought the "delete it and ping mods" scheme would work
😹😹
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
yo ;w; I'm struggling w my pre-calculus rn anybody help ;w;
you just need to keep adding or subtracting 360 degrees
until you get an angle between 0 and 360 deg
and convert rad to deg
how do i conver rad to deg?
yes so 1 rad = 180/pi deg
but theres no rad in my scientific calcu
so you can multiply by 180/pi to convert it to degree
can you send a pic?
remember your calculator doesn't think for you
there will definitle be a rad mode
yeah or you don't know how to do that function on your calculator
OH! THE MODE YEA
lol
yeah the mode button on your calc lol
yeah and what do I do now again? TAT
you need help in which part?
this
I keep forgetting lmao TT
how do I know if I should subtract or add?
well 736 is more than 360
so subtract 360
yes so subtract 360 again
yep!
what about the 2nd one ;w;
now you just need to convert b, c, d into degrees only
I'll go back to degree mode
ah can your calculator convert that to degrees?
yes
,w 28 degrees 48 minutes 65 seconds to degrees
oh yeah that looks right then
Result:
28.818055555556
lmao
it rounds for no reason
great so add 360
i need to add 360?
yeah
what about the 13pi/2?
convert that to degrees first
pi radians = 180 deg
so you can replace the pi
how do I do that with my calculator?
!help
To ask for mathematics help on this server, please open your own help channel or help thread. See #❓how-to-get-help for instructions.
cool
now we're going to use the fact that 2pi = 360 degrees
so multiples of 360 degrees
12pi = 6 * 360 degrees
that means we can just do 2340 - 6 * 360 degrees
or 13pi - 6 * 2pi radians
you're subtracting this time
when you have larger than 360 degrees, you subtract
when you have smaller than 0 degrees, you add
it should always below 360 right?
between 0 and 360
the lowest I got is 180
okay cool that's what I get too
okay finally for part d
oh nice
10- 2pi
,calc (10 - 2 * pi) * 180/pi
Result:
212.95779513082
and then convert to degrees yeah
no, multiply by 180 / pi
180 deg = pi radians
so (180 deg) / (pi radians) = 1
multiplying by 1 doesn't change the number
also you can convert to degrees
ah but you need to set your calculator to radian mode
and then use the degree symbol in ANS
212.95779513082 x 180pi?
then?
what is this about?
converting from radians to degrees
radians cancels with radians, so the radians is on the denominator here
leaving us with an answer in degrees
c is also used for radians, correct
I'm stuck at letter C
c is just 180 degrees
answer?
yes
The other says the answer is pi/2 rad
onto the next one help
<@&286206848099549185>
I'll wait TOT
Oh I just put the letter on the table?
I don't know how to draw it in TT
so i'll just put the letter on the side?
I meant in the table
OH
mb mb I'm rlly tired rn. but thank u!
oh-
dang
oh wait yeah pi/2 rad is not 180 degrees my bad
it was 13pi/2 - 6pi = pi/2 rad
Closed by @deep marlin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
yp
the goals can be at any time
e.g. GGGGGXXXXX is scoring five goals then five not goals
or GXGXGXGXGX
alternating scoring and not scoring
the number ways to acore 5/10 goals is by choosing 5 of 10 to be goals
aka 10 choose 5
so using the 10C5 gives us the posibility of getting any of those combinations, while leaving it out only gives the posibility of only getting one combination?
it counts all the different combinations
basically youre calculating the probability of GGGGGXXXXX then the probability of GXGXGXGXGX and so on, but since the probability of each are all the same, you can do (10C5)*probability of one case
and in d u leave it out cos u only want the probability of of one combination (all combinations have the same probability)
is that right?
in d?
yep the question below
you want a specific case for d
ye a specific combination
specifically GXXXGXXXGX
so you only want the probability of that
no multiplying by some nCr
Closed by @untold mirage
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello everyone! I was learning about polar coordinates and integration. Is my way of getting the length of an arc (1) correct? And can someone explain why 2 is correct?
@young depot Has your question been resolved?
@young depot Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
!15m
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
Do you know the expression for the general binomial term
say for (a+b)^n
do you know the rth term?
Yes
I did after simplifying it but it’s so complicated
Okay
so (x^k + 1)^b
yk the degree of x in this would be kb
example, (x^2 +1)^2
= x^4 + 1 + 2x^2
4 = 2*2
right?
Order?
no not order
Yes
degree
10-r/3
and we have x^(r/2) in the denominator
Yes
to have a term independent of x
these degrees should be equal
i think it's 4, option a
is it?
:(
It’s c
Wait they are asking term independent of x so ig the value
,w 10 choose 4
Also 1 more doubt arises if complete terms is to independent all of the components of expansion (x^1/3+1)^10-r has to be independent of x

Can you help me with this Ik it’s silly
well say the numerator's degree wasn't equal to the denominator's degree
they'd never divide to give an expression of degree 0
so I didn't even bother to think about that and just equated the degrees
,w (x^(1/3) + 1)^6
,w (x^(1/3) + 1)^6 / x^2
I mean if numerator is greater then it’s possible one of terms may be independent as the degree of one may be equal to one in denominator
thats true
valid point
good question
well if we expand the expression
whatever it was
also I think this ques is not meant to be expanded
and do the same thing we did, we'd also get 4 as the answer
can you elaborate?
write the general term (rth term) for this expansion
is that (10 - r C z) * x^z/3