#help-10

1 messages · Page 404 of 1

fathom kindle
#

oh so theres a horizontal asymptote but

#

no vertical one?

#

i thought it just goes up infinitely

#

or it still like goes to the right

#

ye

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @fathom kindle

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

tribal bloom
obtuse pebbleBOT
tribal bloom
#

I don't understand this one at all

#

Do I multiply each coordinate of the vertex?

#

Which is (8,-6)?

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @tribal bloom

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

strong kestrel
obtuse pebbleBOT
latent walrus
#

hm?

strong kestrel
#

ik a

#

but some guy was helping me out with the following

#

but b is what got me the most

latent walrus
#

whats up with b

strong kestrel
#

so I know that g(a) is 4, however it isn't define in this case. but limg(x) is. So I am confused into like finding the limit of this

#

or the point

#

or whatever Im looking for

restive gorge
#

i also dont know why the channel got closed lol

strong kestrel
#

yeah that's what I was thinking too

#

oh yeah mb

#

G(4)

#

right?

restive gorge
#

for b) in simple terms look for a value of x where from both sides you approach the same limit, but at that limit the value has a circle

restive gorge
strong kestrel
#

a I mean

restive gorge
#

yes

#

for a) correct

#

a = 4

restive gorge
#

No

strong kestrel
#

or 2

restive gorge
#

don't guess

#

Again

strong kestrel
#

yeah mb

#

5?

restive gorge
#

yes

#

but explain

#

i cannot make it more simpler

#

limit exists if from both sides your approach the same value

strong kestrel
#

bro

#

so

#

omg

#

thank you for telling me this

restive gorge
#

what

strong kestrel
#

my professor hasn't told me that

restive gorge
strong kestrel
#

ok so im getting it know

#

the fact that its 5 is due to the fact that both sides meet up at a undefined point

restive gorge
#

yea lmao

#

what happened to you

strong kestrel
#

bro

#

Im literally on my notes looking for this infoormation

restive gorge
#

brain sparked

strong kestrel
#

I mean yeah

restive gorge
#

well then c)

strong kestrel
#

its 2 and 4

#

2 is the one coming from the left, while 4 is the one coming from the right

#

or 2 is the minus and 4 is the plus

restive gorge
#

yes you are right

strong kestrel
#

ooh

#

you got me thinking hard for a seccond

restive gorge
#

i read c) wrong

#

you are right

strong kestrel
#

i have a question tho

restive gorge
#

sure

strong kestrel
#

oh wait nvm

restive gorge
#

brain sparked again

strong kestrel
#

I was about to ask why couldn't it be a singular value since their coming from both ways

restive gorge
#

what

strong kestrel
#

but lim g(x) DNE

restive gorge
#

ah

strong kestrel
#

yeah

#

and then

#

d

strong kestrel
#

is 4

restive gorge
#

yea

strong kestrel
#

because it's a plus and g(4)

strong kestrel
warm shaleBOT
strong kestrel
#

yeah

#

and if isnt

#

then its DNE

restive gorge
#

in case your professor has another profession

restive gorge
strong kestrel
#

dam well thank you man

restive gorge
#

thank yourself

strong kestrel
#

I appreciate your help

restive gorge
#

thanks

strong kestrel
#

wait btw

strong kestrel
#

cause I have a calc exam next week. Do you know any good youtube videos about calculus

restive gorge
#

uhm

strong kestrel
#

or any other resources

restive gorge
#

calculus is kinda big and vague

strong kestrel
#

ok

restive gorge
#

is it calc 1 or calc 2?

strong kestrel
#

well specifically like limits, laws of limits and discontinuity

#

calc 1

restive gorge
#

oh

strong kestrel
#

Im like in the intro of calculus

restive gorge
#

The Organic Chemestry is good

strong kestrel
#

he's pretty good

#

thanks for the suggestion!

restive gorge
#

good luck

#

with your calc exam

strong kestrel
#

thanks man

#

hope you have a great day

restive gorge
#

you too

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@strong kestrel Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

rich dust
#

hello

obtuse pebbleBOT
rich dust
#

i need help

#

on epsilon delta proofs

#

i am very lost

#

i have not begun this problem

#

<@&286206848099549185>

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@rich dust Has your question been resolved?

rich dust
#

someone pls help me

rich dust
#

<@&286206848099549185> someone pls

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@rich dust Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@rich dust Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

primal moon
#

can someone help me

obtuse pebbleBOT
primal moon
#

i know this is really easy, i kinda forgot if the answer would be 3 or dne(does not exist) since the points arent touching

terse pivot
#

f(3) = 3

#

but lim as x approaches 3 is dne

primal moon
#

so it would be does not exist

copper bough
#

yes

prime swallow
#

Yes

terse pivot
#

this is a peicewise funciton, as we approach from the left, negative values, we approach 5, as we approach from the right we approach -2, so DNE

primal moon
#

ty ty this is review and i forgot the case for these

copper bough
#

if the graph approaches different values from each side it is DNE

terse pivot
#

hehe wait until you get to multi variable with limits, im stuck on a problem right now

#

infinitely many ways you can approach a point

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@primal moon Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @primal moon

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

odd plover
obtuse pebbleBOT
odd plover
#

Yo help pls how do I solve question 21?

copper bough
#

JH bisecting WJM means WJH and JHM will be the same angle

odd plover
#

But how do I solve it???

#

I mean solve for x

copper bough
#

which also means 2(HJM)=WJM

#

since it gives you HJM and WJM you can just plug in each

#

2(4x-19)=2x+7

#

and go from there

odd plover
#

You’re very intelligent and bright

#

Let me try this out rq

#

One question

#

Would the x= 15/2?

copper bough
#

yes i think so

odd plover
#

Alrighty

#

Thanks bud

#

🫡

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @odd plover

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

vale vapor
obtuse pebbleBOT
vale vapor
#

i don’t know what to do

#

help me plss😢😢

gaunt helm
#

do u see any right triangles

vale vapor
#

FCB

#

CF=10, FB=6, BC=8

gaunt helm
#

u can find DE as well

vale vapor
#

yea

#

and then?

brazen viper
#

Consider DCP and CPE would be the next thing I tried

#

Because DP + PE = 10

#

So you can get two equations and two unknowns

#

PE and CP

vale vapor
#

then how to get CP

brazen viper
#

You have a^2 + b^2 = c^2 for Pythagorean theorem on both triangles DCP and CPE.

#

These are your two equations.

You know all data except for DP, PE, and CP. But you also know that DP + PE = 10

#

So you have:

DP^2 + CP^2 = DC^2 = 8^2 = 64
EP^2 + CP^2 = CE^2 = 6^2 = 36

DP^2 - EP^2 = 64-36 = 28
DP^2 - (DP - 10)^2 = 28

Etc

surreal forge
brazen viper
#

Huh TIL

surreal forge
#

it is not very well known theorem ye

vale vapor
#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @vale vapor

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

dusk coyote
obtuse pebbleBOT
dusk coyote
#

How many pairs of internal "parallel" diagonals does a "Rhombicosidodecahedron" have?

#

<@&286206848099549185>

surreal forge
#

that seems unfortunate

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@dusk coyote Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

spice chasm
#

how do u come up with the answer

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@spice chasm Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @spice chasm

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

velvet sparrow
#

I've watched quite a few videos explaining the Monty hall problem and I genuinely cannot seem to understand it.

To me the information that there were prior doors dosent practically change anything, at the end it's always a simple 50/50 chance, it's whether you pick one door or another, can anyone try and explain why the fact there were prior doors matters?

In the example where there are a 100 doors I understand that the first time you picked a door you had a 1% chance but that's irrelevant to the fact that you now only have two doors to choose from is it not?

velvet sparrow
#

Is there any actual proper maths to back it up?

#

To me it seems more psychological than statistical

rich dust
#

.reopen

#

how to dhtis

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@velvet sparrow Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

hollow adder
#

i need help with 10th grade eu Arrays

obtuse pebbleBOT
hollow adder
#

i need to do this without a calculator

worthy birch
#

does the comma denote decimals

hollow adder
#

yes

worthy birch
#

ok

#

try to convert those decimals into x/10 form

#

or x/100

hollow adder
#

okay

#

alright what next

worthy birch
#

write 1.5 as 15/10

#

also

#

simplify

#

like 10^7/10^8 is just 10^-1

hollow adder
#

thanks

worthy birch
#

did you get it?

hollow adder
#

i got 3*10^-6 which is correct

worthy birch
#

yep

hollow adder
#

i think i have one more

worthy birch
#

alr

hollow adder
#

I dont quite get what i am supposed to do.

#

the sqrt of 5 is 2.236067978 and then where is it in the 1 and 0.1 unit lengths

worthy birch
#

do you know any ways to calculate approx values of square root of any number

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@hollow adder Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @hollow adder

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

sterile kayak
#

for positive integers m and n is the following true: $\exists m \quad \forall n \quad m<n$

warm shaleBOT
#

syecko

sterile kayak
#

this would be false yes

shadow dagger
#

yeah (as in it's false)

sterile kayak
#

because i can choose n = 1

#

thus there are no such positive integers m

#

that are less than 1

#

ok thank you

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @sterile kayak

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

wise sluice
obtuse pebbleBOT
wise sluice
#

theres a relative extrema around this interval

#

how do i solve for this?

#

should i do derivative test

restive gorge
#

Do y' = 0

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@wise sluice Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

waxen swan
#

hi, does anyone know how to use the TI-84 Plus CE Python Calculator? I have a question about normal distribution

waxen swan
#

I'll just ask it first:

for the normalcdf function

#

when entering lower and upper limits, how do I factor in <= or >=

#

because for P(a<X<b) you use normalcdf(a,b,mean,standard deviation)

#

so I'm confused how to add "=" into the limits

#

But in here it just ignores the “=“

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@waxen swan Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

scenic lake
obtuse pebbleBOT
restive gorge
scenic lake
#

How did I get the wrong answer when I kept u and changed the limits? Only got the question correct when I subbed x^2+1 back in

restive gorge
#

it's still 5

#

2²+1=4+1=5

scenic lake
#

Oh I’m a little special. I must’ve thought 1+4 in my head and wrote 5 instead of 1

restive gorge
#

yep

scenic lake
#

This is why I should probably use a calculator for everything lol

restive gorge
#

no

scenic lake
#

Thank you bacc!

restive gorge
#

haha

#

no problem Rujee

scenic lake
#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @scenic lake

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

uneven otter
#

I dont fully understand the lipschitz continuity mathematical definition $|f(x_1) - f(x_2)| \leq L|x_1 - x_2|$. This is what I understood so far:

If the function doesnt change too quickly (small changes in the input => small changes in the output) then the function is lipschitz continuous. What I dont understand is since L isnt bounded how do I tell if L is too big or if L is too small.

warm shaleBOT
#

Calc III Victim (Pt. 2)

uneven otter
#

brah

icy wren
#

ah shoot m

#

sry

#

i delete

uneven otter
#

all good lmao

tardy epoch
uneven otter
#

the maximum rate at which the function can change

#

the lipschitz constant

tardy epoch
#

that's gonna change depending on the inputs x1 and x2

uneven otter
#

I still dont understand

tardy epoch
#

the lipschitz constant depends on the function

uneven otter
#

Say for some function if we took two inputs x_1, x_2 that resulted in

|f(x1) - f(x2)| <= 50|x1 - x2|

#

how would I tell

tardy epoch
uneven otter
#

I didnt really understand mb

tardy epoch
#

depends on the function mean you need to give the function to find the lipschitz constant

uneven otter
#

so something like f(x) = 100x wouldnt be lipschitz continous?

tardy epoch
#

wot

#

all differentiable functions are lipschitz continuous, at least locally

#

In mathematical analysis, Lipschitz continuity, named after German mathematician Rudolf Lipschitz, is a strong form of uniform continuity for functions. Intuitively, a Lipschitz continuous function is limited in how fast it can change: there exists a real number such that, for every pair of points on the graph of this function, the absolute valu...

uneven otter
#

alr

tardy epoch
dapper sedge
#

they have to be C1

tardy epoch
#

Yea C^1 is what i was thinking of. thanks

dapper sedge
#

all good mane

zenith raft
tardy epoch
#

oh yes that's why locally is important

#

should also depend on X the set where the inputs come from. thanks stranger.

zenith raft
#

stranger? damn

uneven otter
#

Ah so its not a lipschitz cont function if there is no single finite constant L that could control the rate of change for the whole function?

zenith raft
#

never dming you again

uneven otter
#

mhm alr Imma get back to this after class

#

ty

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @uneven otter

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

calm hornet
#

can anyone help with some stats

obtuse pebbleBOT
calm hornet
#

some guidance how how to even start this:

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@calm hornet Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@calm hornet Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

scenic ledge
obtuse pebbleBOT
scenic ledge
#

alright so

#

for this

#

prior they had added one in order to make a perfect square

#

what confuses me is

scenic ledge
#

they removed the power of 2

#

isolating X

#

and solving for ONLY x alone

scenic ledge
#

and that by solving for that you would get the answer

#

so what im guessing is they

#

then use that root and put it into the original equation

#

and that what this is saying

#

is that you dont need any of the other X

#

if you can manage to remove them and just solve for one X that is fine

#

because you can still use that root for all of them

#

is this true?

#

well i mean this must be true as they did square it in the end

#

but something that doesnt make sense to me and this is probably an identity issue

#

is

scenic ledge
#

but

#

theres a kind of an issue in that

#

well

#
5 + 10 = x (x is 15)
5 + 10 = 15
5^2 + 10^2 = 25 + 100 = 75
#

this then leads me to

#

well the answer that

scenic ledge
#

in the sense that if you did the sqrt to all operations the result drastically changes and trying to find a very specefic result of zero would not seemingly work since all operations would differ in result and equivalency

scenic ledge
#

if you were trying to isolate X....

scenic ledge
scenic ledge
#

and thatit was separate

#

what a mess

#

ill make a new channel

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @scenic ledge

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

timid silo
#

hi

obtuse pebbleBOT
timid silo
#

is A^2 + B^2 equals to (A+B)^2 ?

junior granite
opaque dome
#

Only if a or b is zero

timid silo
timid silo
opaque dome
#

Otherwise you have to add 2AB

timid silo
#

now i am doign some weird questions,
and getting condused between

opaque dome
timid silo
#

a^2-b^2
and (a-b)^2

#

can you guys explain

opaque dome
timid silo
opaque dome
#

xd

timid silo
opaque dome
#

!original

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.

opaque dome
#

It depends the context for sure

timid silo
#

the question is totally unrelated

#

i am not able to get the idea of which one to use

#

i faced this issue in calculus as well

#

probably some learning gap

opaque dome
#

But it just depends on how its written

timid silo
#

yeah that's what i am asking

opaque dome
#

And we can't help you since we don't see how its written

#

Like if you have (a+b)^2 = a^2 + b^2 + 2ab

#

But if you have a^2 + b^2, theres a specific but useless one identity

#

Involving the one above

timid silo
#

okay

#

how about this

#

(a+b) * (a-b)

can i call this (a-b)^2

opaque dome
opaque dome
#

Develop both and see

#

(a-b)^2 = a^2 + b^2 -2ab

timid silo
#

yeah we are getting extra 2 ab

pallid orbit
#

1+1=2

timid silo
#

a^2 - b^2 it is then

opaque dome
#

So you have 2ab in more and a b^2 changing sign

timid silo
opaque dome
#

Stop

pallid orbit
#

ok

timid silo
#

bro, im not sure how your parents handle you

#

i might lose it if it was me

#

lol

pallid orbit
#

lol

timid silo
#

actually, that shit makes sense now, i need a break

opaque dome
#

Fine, have a good break then

timid silo
#

making basic mistakes

#

literally one fucking sign

#

rip

timid silo
#

hi

#

guys wait

#

one last thing

pallid orbit
#

ngl I am so bad at math

opaque dome
timid silo
#

sqrt a+b * sqrt a-b

pallid orbit
#

bruh

timid silo
#

what will that bcome

#

become

timid silo
opaque dome
pallid orbit
opaque dome
#

Oh wait

timid silo
opaque dome
#

Yes

#

It can

#

Only if a>b

pallid orbit
#

what does this mean?

#

😭

timid silo
#

in some cases my b will be lower than a

#

something like this it will be

#

yeah

#

i got it

#

thanks everyone

#

i am an idiot

opaque dome
pallid orbit
#

My 13 year old brain might just die 💀

timid silo
#

nah it is easy stuff

pallid orbit
timid silo
pallid orbit
#

😭

#

I aint readdy for highschool

timid silo
opaque dome
timid silo
pallid orbit
timid silo
opaque dome
timid silo
#

yeahhhhh

#

good point

opaque dome
#

Thats why

timid silo
#

ask some maths questions here

pallid orbit
#

If there is a black hole then should there be a white hole to?

timid silo
#

yup

pallid orbit
timid silo
#

thank you

pallid orbit
#

bruh

#

ok

timid silo
#

hahaha jk

pallid orbit
#

alr

#

lol

#

how old is the water in my body

#

2 million years old?

#

idk

feral ember
#

hi guys

#

its me

#

alvin

pallid orbit
#

hello spider

feral ember
#

from alvin and the chimpmunks

pallid orbit
#

💀

feral ember
#

@timid silo

#

whats 20 devided by 37.9 squared

pallid orbit
#

tbh

#

I have no clue

#

im not liein

feral ember
#

ima leave

#

give me a reason to saty

pallid orbit
#

your spider

#

there for you should stay

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@timid silo Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

dawn falcon
obtuse pebbleBOT
#
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
dawn falcon
#

1

hidden compass
#

If you had to find the vertical asymptotes of that function, how would you do it?

dawn falcon
#

u set the denominator to = 0 ?

#

but arent the asymptotes already given to me

#

oh wait i got it

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @dawn falcon

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

naive kindle
#

max(0,x) can someoen explain how this is equivalent to the relu

naive kindle
#

how would i read this

tardy epoch
#

what's the definition of relu

naive kindle
#

piecewise function, if x is neg its cut at 0

#

otherwise x

radiant oxide
#

who here knows their combinatorics very well

wary badger
obtuse pebbleBOT
radiant oxide
naive kindle
#

$$\text{ReLU}[x]=\begin{cases}
0 ~~~~~~\text{if }x<0
\
x ~~~~~~\text{if }x\geq0
\end{cases}$$

warm shaleBOT
#

pyrate

wary badger
#

if x<0 then the max(0,x) is 0

#

because 0>any negative number

zenith raft
#

it is the exact same thing as max(0,x)

#

oh

wary badger
#

if x>0 then max(0,x) is just x

zenith raft
#

you asked why

naive kindle
#

yee im just trying to understand the notation

wary badger
zenith raft
#

🥩

wary badger
#

🥩

naive kindle
#

so for the max function, you pass x in and it compares the two (0 and x)

#

and returns whichever is max

#

or greater

tardy epoch
#

indeed

naive kindle
#

kk cool

#

ty

zenith raft
#

so many bending_skulls

naive kindle
#

indeed

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @naive kindle

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

tardy epoch
zenith raft
tardy epoch
zenith raft
obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

shrewd comet
obtuse pebbleBOT
shrewd comet
#

help check if correct

unreal musk
shrewd comet
#

ok wait

unreal musk
#

Then of course, you can (re)do the tangent and normal gradient from there sadCatThumbsUp just multiply them both by -1, cause that's the only difference between them

shrewd comet
#

so grad tangent is pos

#

grad normal is -2/3

unreal musk
#

Yep, which visually matches up, as per yesterday's comment KL1LoveHug

#

The normal is going down so should have negative gradient, the function at P is increasing so should have positive gradient there SCgoodjob2

shrewd comet
#

ok so eqn would be y=-2/3x +4/3

#

how to start

unreal musk
#

It seems they want you to do this one by working out the area under the curve, so this blue area, first - do you know how to find that?

#

The area under y = 8/(1 - 3x) and above the x axis between x = -1 and x = 0

shrewd comet
#

erm no what formula should i use

unreal musk
# shrewd comet

Yep, that gets you the area catokay do you know how to integrate 1/x?

#

(this one is a little bit special nyaNana)

shrewd comet
#

lnx

unreal musk
#

Yep, though keep absolute values just in case, ln|x| SCgoodjob2

#

So you can work out that integral $\int_{-1}^0 \frac8{1 - 3x} \dd x$ fine?

warm shaleBOT
#

@unreal musk

shrewd comet
unreal musk
#

You just need to work out that $-\frac83 \ln\abs{1 - 3x}$ between the limits of 0 and -1 now! (you don't need a $+c$ for definite integrals, they'll cancel out anyway!)

warm shaleBOT
#

@unreal musk

shrewd comet
#

oh ok

unreal musk
#

The limits are 0 and -1, aren't they? sadCatThumbsUp

shrewd comet
#

oh shoot

#

where did i get that

unreal musk
shrewd comet
unreal musk
#

Number seems about right SCgoodjob2 you don't need the outer absolute value bars here, and the line above it is 0 + (8/3)ln(4) anyway catLove

unreal musk
#

Hopefully that's easier to find SCgoodjob2

shrewd comet
unreal musk
#

There you go KL1LoveHug well done GentleHug

shrewd comet
#

thanks!!! last qn hehe

#

how to start

#

do i just equate the LHS to the A earlier

unreal musk
#

Just work the integral out and find out what the bottom limit needs to be SCsnuggle

shrewd comet
#

not this?

#

oh wait i didnt see the x

#

on the integral

unreal musk
#

,rccw

warm shaleBOT
shrewd comet
#

how do i get the Q

unreal musk
#

The x coordinate of Q is the value for x you'll find when you work the integral out catokay

shrewd comet
unreal musk
#

Yep happyCat

#

Then expand both sides, that should be nice to solve, $\frac83 \ln(4) = \frac83 \ln(4) - \frac83 \ln(1 - 3x)$ (the absolute values removed because $1 - 3x$ would be positive when $x < -1$)

warm shaleBOT
#

@unreal musk

unreal musk
shrewd comet
#

isnt it already the 2nd line

unreal musk
#

Oh yeah, so it is catThink then just simplify the insides of the log and don't factor it catokay

shrewd comet
unreal musk
#

Yep SCgoodjob2

shrewd comet
#

erm whats after

unreal musk
#

And that's all equal to $\frac83 \ln(4)$, that is:
[
\frac83 \ln(4) = -\frac83 \ln(4) + \frac83\ln(1 - 3x)
]

warm shaleBOT
#

@unreal musk

unreal musk
#

So solve that for x catokay

shrewd comet
#

eh how

#

u said we dont factor

unreal musk
#

Don't factor the right hand side nyaNana it makes it easier to move stuff around now to get the stuff that has x in it by itself!

unreal musk
shrewd comet
#

oh we're able to transpose?

#

i thought we need to prove LHS=RHS lol

unreal musk
#

Noooo catGiggle you're just solving an equation here, rather than proving they're equal SCsnuggle

shrewd comet
unreal musk
#

,rccw

warm shaleBOT
unreal musk
# shrewd comet

Yep happyCat you take the x = -5 one here of course, because if you look at the graph, you "clearly" want x to be less than -1 SCsnuggle

shrewd comet
#

got it

#

what about the next line?

#

its the same

unreal musk
#

You can ignore that cause you ended up with that before anyway KL1LoveHug

#

(also ping replies please KL1Ping just in case I don't see them LoveYou)

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@shrewd comet Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

tulip zodiac
#

Hello, I was trying to solve the birthday problem, and my intuition was: Since we want to find the probability of at least one match, then I could find the probability of each pair of people P(A intercept B) = 365/(365*365) multiplied by nCr(n, 2) minus all the times the interception has been taken into account which would be (n-1) (365/365^n) so the whole formula would be

but this doesn't match with the results ive seen online

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@tulip zodiac Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@tulip zodiac Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@tulip zodiac Has your question been resolved?

tulip zodiac
#

Update: I have been using this formula because I noticed some flaws in my train of thought

for n = 4:
$\operatorname{nCr}\left(4,2\right)\cdot365\cdot\frac{364\cdot363}{365^{4}}+\operatorname{nCr}\left(4,3\right)\cdot365\cdot\frac{364}{365^{4}}+\frac{365}{365^{4}}$

warm shaleBOT
#

Edsel Di Meo

tulip zodiac
#

This almost matches the calculation
$1-\frac{\left(365\cdot364\cdot363\cdot362\right)}{365^{4}}$

warm shaleBOT
#

Edsel Di Meo

tulip zodiac
#

There's some combination I'm not taking into account in my formulation

#

but they are reaaaaally close

#

My formula yields 0.01633345586 the correct one 0.01635591247

#

for n = 5, it's the same thing

my formula: 0.02702411102 the correct one 0.0271355737

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@tulip zodiac Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

crude cape
#

How can i simplfy this expresion?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.

crude cape
#

How can i simplify this expresion? or i cant simplify this more

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

timid silo
obtuse pebbleBOT
last pilot
#

what exactly is your question @timid silo

timid silo
last pilot
#

for derivatives?

boreal cliff
#

It's not readable either

#

not for me at least

last pilot
#

i can

timid silo
last pilot
#

okay

#

so the top

#

i.e. f(n + delta n) - f(n)

#

is simply the change that occurs in f(x)

#

when you change x by delta n

#

and delta n is simply the change in x

#

so this is really just (change in y)/(change in x)

#

aka slope

#

it's just that we add a limit

#

to get instantaneous slope

timid silo
#

Slope means

last pilot
#

...

boreal cliff
#

...

last pilot
#

like the rate of change of the graph

#

the rate at which it curves, you could say

boreal cliff
#

$\frac{\text{Rise}}{\text{Run}}$?

warm shaleBOT
amber snow
boreal cliff
#

not me latexing that for no reason

boreal cliff
last pilot
#

^

#

let's forget tangents

#

that'll confuse OP

boreal cliff
#

yes

amber snow
last pilot
boreal cliff
#

if you're british, it's gradient

#

we mean gradient

last pilot
#

i think op is indian

timid silo
iron edge
#

How steep a slope is

last pilot
#

how steeply the graph curves

boreal cliff
amber snow
boreal cliff
#

op are you indian and if so in what class

last pilot
amber snow
last pilot
#

main hindi bol sakta hu agar aapko vo aur aache se samaj aayega

last pilot
#

;-;

timid silo
boreal cliff
#

bro thinks he's op ;-;

last pilot
amber snow
boreal cliff
timid silo
boreal cliff
#

original poster.

last pilot
#

*sighs*

timid silo
last pilot
amber snow
boreal cliff
obtuse pebbleBOT
#

Please read the channel description before posting, and stay on topic.

last pilot
#

@amber snow

timid silo
boreal cliff
#

ykwim

#

except here it need not be a line.

last pilot
#

^

boreal cliff
#

just the rise over the run

timid silo
boreal cliff
#

you're an indian in 11th grade

last pilot
#

okay percy

boreal cliff
#

dhikkar /lh

last pilot
#

no stereotyping

#

i see where you're going with this

boreal cliff
#

im joking obvs

last pilot
timid silo
boreal cliff
#

ah

timid silo
last pilot
#

do you understand the basic concept of slope

timid silo
last pilot
#

slope is basically how steep a graph is

#

if a graph has very high slope

#

that means the "y" of the graph increases very quickly

#

if you increase the x only a little

#

if a graph has low slope that means that the graph's y value changes slowly in comparision

#

a graph with 0 slope is a flat graph--the y doesn't change; it's a constant graph

#

and a graph with negative slope decreases with increases in x

timid silo
#

Oh ok ty i understand some point

last pilot
#

good

#

i suggest you get a bit comfortable with slope

#

before you do derivatives

#

because derivatives really require you to fully understand slope

timid silo
#

Can u teach me slope

last pilot
#

tbh im not a very good teacher

#

this guy is tho

iron edge
#

I was about to send this 🤣

last pilot
#

watch it and lmk if you need help

last pilot
timid silo
last pilot
timid silo
last pilot
obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@timid silo Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

lone bobcat
#

What am I doing wrong?

obtuse pebbleBOT
lone bobcat
obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@lone bobcat Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

lament iron
#

Honestly no idea what this even means? Big ask but can someone help my explain this as I don't even know what to search up to learn this?

lament iron
#

like I vaguely understand what one-to-one/onto mean, what a modulus is but as a whole idk

solar meadow
#

It said here that M(x) is a function such that if x is an integer, M(x) is also an integer

vale pelican
#

M is an integer-valued function, taking an integer x and computing the remainder of (2x+5)/7

#

a function is called one-to-one (injective) if every input corresponds to a unique output, i.e. M(x) = M(y) implies that x = y

solar meadow
#

(2x + 5) (mod 7) is the remainder when 2x + 5 is divided by 7 (Number Theory).

vale pelican
#

a function is onto (surjective) if for every element z in the codomain, there is some x in the domain for which M(x) = z

#

to show that M is indeed a function, it must provide only one output for each input, i.e. if x = y, then M(x) = M(y)

solar meadow
solar meadow
vale pelican
lament iron
#

ok so it's the domain stuff that's confusing me rn

#

m(x) is a function that calculates the modulus of the sum (2x+5)?

vale pelican
#

mod 7, yeah

lament iron
#

errr

#

and there's a certain amount of ouputs that map to something?

vale pelican
#

the outputs are what's being mapped to

#

inputs map to outputs

solar meadow
lament iron
#

right right I think I'm getting it

#

so there's 2 "fields", inputs and outputs? and each input maps to a certain output?

vale pelican
#

yeah

lament iron
#

and I assume I'm trying to prove that that there's a limited amount of outputs?

vale pelican
#

inputs live in the domain, outputs live in the codomain, and the function maps each input to one output

lament iron
#

okok

vale pelican
solar meadow
lament iron
#

I would assume since there's only a limited amount of answers the mod can be

#

0-6?

lament iron
#

then I'm just trying to prove that it's either one-to-one or onto? or are those different things

vale pelican
#

1-to-1 says that each output is reached at most once

#

whereas onto says that each output is reached at least once

lament iron
#

aaah

vale pelican
#

actually I don't mean "output" here

#

I mean each element in the codomain really

#

so each codomain element is an output for at most one / at least one input, respectively

lament iron
#

ok right I think I got it

#

so would I not just assume that it's onto? given there's an infinite domain?

#

how would I figure that out?

vale pelican
#

M is onto if for every z in the codomain, there is some x in the domain for which M(x) = z

#

in this context, for every integer z, there is an integer x so that M(x) = (2x + 5) mod 7 = z

#

and you must determine if this is true or false

lament iron
#

riiiight I think?

#

uhhfgjhjkf

#

ok I think I understand conceptually at least, but idk how I'd do that mathematically

#

my first instinct of understanding is that I'd solve for x = 1 in the original formula or something, then find the output?

#

then like throw both the input and output into those formulas or something?

solar meadow
#

1: 7 inputs has to have 7 unique outputs
2: 8 inputs has to have 8 unique outputs|
3: infinity > 8
4: take out any 8 inputs from the infinitely many integer inputs
5: Notice you need 8 outputs but you only have 7
6: QED

lament iron
#

right I understand that. but how should I demonstrate that? do I literally just type something to that effect? Do I manually test the case for 8 inputs? or is that something I'm demonstrating with the formulas above?

solar meadow
#

Just prove it logically with the statements

  1. 7 inputs has to have 7 unique outputs
  2. 8 inputs has to have 8 unique outputs
  3. infinity > 8
lament iron
#

okok gotcha

rocky goblet
#

i mean tbh what i'd do here is just

#

"onto" means for each element of the codomain, there's some element of the domain that gets mapped there

#

so to show it's not onto, find some element of the codomain, and show that no element of the domain is mapped there

#

we know that the only possible outputs are 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, so you can just give like, 7, as an example, and prove that M(x) can never be 7

#

and then that implies M isn't onto

lament iron
#

Alright this is what I've written as my answer:

As the function m(x) = (2x + 5) mod 7 always returns values between the set (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) we know that there’s a limited codomain.

We can also understand that there’s an infinite domain, as the input, x, is not restricted.

Logically, one-to-one demonstrates that for each element of the codomain it matches to exactly one element of the domain. Automatically, we can understand that M is not one-to-one, as there’s far greater elements in the domain than elements in the codomain. This mean that M is onto.

Would this work?

rocky goblet
# solar meadow ???

...well that's valid if you've proven all of the facts about cardinality that you're implicitly invoking there, although my way does actually seem like a shorter proof and also follows directly from the definitions

rocky goblet
#

they said M : Z -> Z, so the codomain is Z

#

the set of outputs that the function actually has, which in this case is {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6}, is called... ok well i call it "range", but according to wikipedia people sometimes use that to mean the codomain, and the people who do that instead call it the "image", which i use to mean something else, ok so basically the terminology is a mess actually

#

but it's definitely a different thing

lament iron
#

lmao

rocky goblet
#

by your logic here all functions would be onto

lament iron
#

hmmm

rocky goblet
#

but the fact that its range (or whatever we're calling it), {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6}, isn't the same as its codomain, Z, ...is just what it means for it to not be onto, so

lament iron
#

so my assumption is that there's 2 seperate things, codomain and range? but in this scenario they both just have the same values?

#

and you're saying I can't equivocate them?? or something?

#

I'm kinda lost

rocky goblet
#

no in this case they're completely different

#

one is {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6} and the other is Z

lament iron
#

sooo

rocky goblet
#

"M : Z -> Z" means its domain and codomain are both Z

#

a function is onto iff its range is equal to its codomain

lament iron
#

aah right ok

rocky goblet
#

the range of this particular function is {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6}, which is not Z, therefore it's not onto

lament iron
#

nvm i'm lost lol

#

so you're saying it's not onto?

rocky goblet
#

yes

lament iron
#

but it can't be one-to-one either?

#

logically one-to-one is that one element map to another, but with infinite inputs and finite outputs, that can't be possible?

rocky goblet
#

yep, it's not one-to-one either

#

(i don't know why you're specifying "logically" here)

#

for instance M(0) = M(7)

#

wait it's called M why did they call it M

lament iron
#

I say logically, cause that's how my brain is doing it logically, I literally have only learnt of these concepts 30 mins ago lol, I could be entirely wrong :P

#

but regardless, doesn't it have to be one of the two?

#

the question itself states onto OR one-to-one

round rock
#

A function in general doesn't have to be either even if the question implies it is

rocky goblet
#

as an even simpler example, the function f : Z -> Z defined as f(x) = 0 is not one-to-one and is not onto

#

it sends everything to one value, so it's not one-to-one, and it doesn't send anything to any of the other integers, so it's not onto either

#

and yeah the phrasing of the question is maybe not ideal but they just meant it as two separate questions

#
  1. is it one-to-one
  2. is it onto
lament iron
#

yeah true I guess

#

it says "determine IF IT IS one-to-one or onto"

#

mb

#

so how do I actually go about solving this then

rocky goblet
#

...well we just did?

#

it's not onto, because it can only ever output values in {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6}, which isn't all of Z

#

it's not one-to-one, because M(0) = M(7) but 0 is not 7

lament iron
#

suuuuure ⁉️

lament iron
rocky goblet
#

...no, i have no idea what you're talking about

#

i meant that {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6} and Z are different sets

rocky goblet
#

for instance 7 is in Z, but it is not in {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6}

#

also 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, etc., are all in Z and are not in {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6}

#

so they're different

lament iron
#

and I'm tryna ask what z is

rocky goblet
#

it's the set of all integers

lament iron
#

wha

rocky goblet
#

...if you didn't know that then that explains a lot of why you've been finding this confusing

lament iron
#

ok now sure maybe I get it

rocky goblet
#

$\mathbb{Z}$

warm shaleBOT
#

bee [it/its]

round rock
#

Iconic symbol

lament iron
#

yah

#

like I said I've never learnt of any of this stuff till now, I just assumed z was standard notation for domain/codomain, like x or y, like I originally thought that I was trying to find the (co)domain and that's what the (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) was

#

or i,j, k

round rock
#

Imagine X & Y in this picture are both Z

lament iron
#

yeah yeah

round rock
#

And f(x) is your M(x)

#

The picture would have an infinite amount of dots pointing in the red section to the yellow section (ie, many to one)

#

And no dots in the red pointing to anything in the blue (not all onto)

lament iron
#

as in the yellow section would be in the red section?

round rock
#

No, the yellow section represents the set {0,1,2,3,4,5,6}

lament iron
#

I gotta drop out bro

#

uhhhhhhghgsdkfk

#

alright I think I vaguely understand

round rock
#

Red section is Z and blue section is also Z

#

Yellow section is inside the blue section bc {0,1,2,3,4,5,6} is a subset of Z

lament iron
#

sure

#
 As the function m(x) = (2x + 5) mod 7 always returns values between the range (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6).

We can also understand that there’s an infinite domain as the input, x, is not restricted. And as M: Z > Z, we understand that there’s also an infinite codomain.

Logically, one-to-one demonstrates that for each element of the codomain it matches to exactly one element of the domain. Automatically, we can understand that M is not one-to-one, as there the set of answers is only 7. However, it’s also not onto as not every codomain is in use either, as the set of answers is far smaller than the codomain.

Revising my previous asnwer, does this sound vaguely correct

#

ignoring my incomplete sentences

#

smh

round rock
#

Adding examples for your reasoning would be good too

lament iron
#

but it's vaguely correct?

round rock
#
 However, it’s also not onto as not every codomain is in use either,
#

"not every element in the codomain is in the range"

lament iron
#

aah that would prob be better wording yeah

round rock
#

Domains and codomains are usually defined depending on what type of numbers you are "playing with"

#

In this case all the numbers we are using are integers which is why they both Z

#

If I were to make a function that turns an integer into decimal then it would be like f: Z -> Q

#

And what's Q?

lament iron
#

uh

#

uhh

#

irrational numbers ⁉️

#

or rational numbers ⁉️

round rock
#

Yeah so you need to learn your definitions for sets of numbers

lament iron
#

I only remember R cause Real numbers

round rock
#

it's rational aka quotients (hence the Q)

lament iron
#

ah gotcha

round rock
#

You'll be seeing them a lot so it's good to remember

lament iron
#

yeah nah I learnt that stuff like 3 years ago in late high school lol

round rock
#

Well good is an understatement, it's necessary

lament iron
#

right

round rock
#

Yeah sometimes things you think aren't helpful pop up years later

lament iron
#

real asf

#

doing computer science and didn't realize how much math was involved

round rock
#

I did computer science and switched to maths actually haha

#

Preferred the maths side of it

lament iron
#

that's kinda real tbh

#

learning maths beats my ass but once I've learnt it or just learning certain fields in general are really interesting to me

#

coding/network side is boring asf though :(

#

took a coding class and hated it in high school but I just thought it was cause the teacher sucked </3

#

BUT REGARDLESS

#

Thanks for the help the four of you :3

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @lament iron

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

idle plume
obtuse pebbleBOT
idle plume
#

calc 3 book problem

#

i cant figure out how to find the limit of the sequence

median dome
#

so we wish to find $\lim_{n\to\infty}\sqrt[n]{5^n+3^n}$

warm shaleBOT
#

kheerii

median dome
#

first what do you feel like the limit should be?

idle plume
#

well i kinda cheated and checked the graph 😭

#

its 3 or 5