#help-10
1 messages · Page 359 of 1
it uses SOH CAH TOA
so we call the opposite side "a", the adjacent side "b", and the hypotenuse "c"
How fo they get to question 2 I somewhat get q1
it is asking you to show, that for any angle A, it's true that [\sin^2 A + \cos^2 A = 1 ]
pnoןɔ
and this is proved using the pythagorean theorem
for any acute angle
the pythagorean theorem says that [ a^2 + b^2 = c^2 ]
pnoןɔ
Where does the (c•sinA)^2 come from
Isn’t soh A/C
by SOH we have $\sin(A) = \frac ac$
pnoןɔ
so what is a?
Adjacent
Oh sin A * c
So I’m subbing
Oooh
Okay
I think I get it now
Ty
I appreciate u
Thx
.close
Closed by @finite hawk
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What rules graph 2 out for this. They are quite similar I am having trouble seeing the differences here
Result:
0.54134113294645
But the slope should be pretty small
Closed by @tiny spire
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello
i believe it is asking to find the point of intersection
Line (blabla) is tangent to (blabla) in the point (a,b). For a < b, value of (a-b) is...
wdym "Nope"
Its tangent
Wait im indo ill do it
a tangent point is still a point of intersection...
KudaBangke
Tangent doesnt cross
I googled it
It says i need to down grade the fynction
Iy harus dicari turunannya
Fu(x)
Iy yang pertama jg harus diturunin relasinya jd
11+3dy/dx=0
dy/dx=-11/3
Nah dari sana 2 turunan ini harus sama pada titik (a,b)
Jadi kamu masukin ke fungsi yang sudah diturunkan
Ini varieblenya diganti a
= -11/3
Setelah ketemu a-nya tinggal lu masukin ke f(x) yg awal
Nanti a nya kalau di beresin bakal ketemu
a1=1 dan a2=3
Dr sini bisa dicari b nya
b1= -7/3 dan b2=5
Karena a<b
Yang dipake a2 dan b2
a-b=3-5=-2
How about this...
Kalau emang rumus (persamaan1) = (persamaan2) itu berlaku universal
Berarti sama ajah kalau 2 buah garis punya titik temu entah itu perpotongan atau singgung?
There 2 persamaan at play here
The f(x)=g(x)
And f'(x)=g'(x)
Yang kita pake disini itu yang kedua
Karena tangent
Dan kebetulan angkanya enak jadi gw pake yg kedua
Secara umum
Kalau soal grs singgung
Lu akan pake 2 2nya
Udh gitu jd persamaan 2 variebel
Jd beda dengan perpotongan
Karena kalau perpotongan cuma pake persamaan yg pertama
I must ask u are indo right bcs i'll feel real stupid here if u werent and u were helpin a friend out or smth
Lmao
11+3, turunannya -11/3
???
Bkn bkn itu tuh sbntr gw tulis dikertas
Jd gt
Turunan...
Derivative
Saya punya byk pertanyaan, tapi Bro yg satu ini bukan helper pribadi

Santuy weh
Klo mau add friend boleh
Mungkin lu lebih paham klo dr awal persamaannya diubah
Jd
Dr 11x+3y-48=0
Jd y=-(11/3)x+16
Baru yg ynya diturunin
Jd lu y'=-11/3
Iyes
Wkwkwkwkwkw
Tapi bener kan?
Iyh
@copper cape Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
this question is probably simple, but how would I tell if the bottom function gets smaller than the top function as n -> infinitiy
like it crosses over
Is it just by degree
what if the degree has the variable in it
like would y = 5^x be greater than x^10
is it possible to use a limit comparison test here?
that's true
but in terms of degrees, we can see that e^(4/n) approaches e^0 which would be 1, and e^4/n^2 will approach 0 as we go to infinity, quicker because of the degree
I was just wondering if there was a rule to see if a function is smaller than the other
i would just imagine the limit of each sub-function like 4/n, n, and n^2 and see how they relate to the whole of the problem, however, it may not be enough for a proof
@formal latch Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @formal latch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
thank you
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Tired to find the big triangles, its a no.
Since they arent the same size, still no.
well, the first thing to notice is that we have two small triangles in the big triangle
yeah.
what can you say about those two triangles?
We have 2 sides
well
2 90 degres angle.
similar.......
we can apply Pythagoras to many things here
Rlly?
Similar triangle
Use that to establish system of equations
y2 + z2 = 5squared?
Yeah thats works too
But the lengths arent the same.
Brb I will keep trying.
Oh,,
So put them in the same condition?
BRB, I will try by my self.
I will ping you soon, sorry for the disturb..
With 3 equations never done it before..
Its really easy
3 of those?
f
There's 2 in this system
Ik. I need 3
Solve for one, and fill others?
get x^2 term on one side, everything on the other side
Yep
Ok let me try.
Ok
into this
Thats weird
Lol, what did I do?
Where's the 4^2 goes?
Oh let me check.
Never seen these kinds of system.
So in a system if it doesent solve in first try, we try again?
No?
The point of such system is that we can turn them into 1 equation with 1 unknown
I mean in the second try it still have 2 unknown answears.
Wait...
A question: when we have something like this: (zsq - 15)+ zsq = 25, do i always have to switch sides to get -()?
I get it, but just for furture problems.
So how to remove prentecese
prentecese?
Yes.
A question: when we have something like this: (zsq - 15)+ zsq = 25, do i always have to switch sides to get -()?
where is the -() ?
If orenteces are on the other side, i can because - changes signa.
Is there any easier away, if the prenteces are necessary?
Then u have to switch zsqu back
(like when they cant just disappear.)
It will
If's not then there's no answer so either u make a mistake along the step or the teacher made a mistake when they made the question
Dont worry abt this @timid silo
If u not sure, u can use a calculator to solve it for u
Almost all calculator has this functionality but u should stick to do it by hand first
Make sure u sqrt them
But I was curious if I had an exact problem and would do something wrong...
U can use calculator to check
Take a pic of ur calculator
I will show u
I use photo math plus.
No idea
Photo math is an app that you take a picture of a math problem and it solves it.
An example:
Yeah I dont like using app that do all the stuff for u
Any advice before I thank you?
@timid silo Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @bronze elk
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
@tawny copper
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone explain how this is differentiated using the product rule?
why'd you want to use the product rule?
there's a very specific formula that can be applied here
you COULD use product rule, but like ren said, why
ren
You mean the quotient rule?
Ik, I was just curious
yes but this is faster
this is basically quotient rule with v = f(x) and u = 1
Oh ok
Do you mind explaining how it could be done using the product rule?
Just out of curiosity
you can use prod rule, but you would still have to use quotient rule then
^^
so purely product, no
since youre differentiating the reciprocal of lnx
yes
anyway, we get 2 log e / log x
then we gotta use quotient
bc we can't really differentiate log_x c w/o quotient
Oh ok
mhm
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
Closed by @tawdry vigil
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
np
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what is going on with this regression 😭
theres no other equation using the same variables
https://www.desmos.com/calculator/dgdbdzu5sv
this is the desmos link
(the equations and table under the first 3 entries are just some other regressions im trying with this section of data points)
@meager mortar Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @meager mortar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I do circles angles
??
circle theorems probably
wat
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
This kind of stuff. This is one of my example but I don’t understand it
How do I apply it?
i think u trying to find the equation of some circle
It did not tell me
center (h,k)=(4,7) and r=4
in that example, you are most likely trying to find the equation of a circle
Yes
since the center is (4,7)
and the raidus is 4
just substitute those values in the standard form of a circle
,,(x-h)^2+(y-k)^2=r^2
Renz
OH!!! Thank you
h will be the x-coord of your center, which is 4
k will be the y-coord of your center, which is 7
for raidus, just count it in the graph
Closed by @unreal marlin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have a 3D physics engine for rectangles but I need to make it apply rotational velocity based on the collisions I detect with SAT. I have looked and found that to do this I need to get the contact points but I cant find how to get them between two 3D objects. Pls tell me if you know how I could get them or if you know a better way to get the needed rotational velocity. I have the vertexes for all cubes, their normals, the normal of the collision and the depth. as well as their center location
@raw plinth Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi there, I have this integral which I'm sure should be simpler, but I've already tried different methods and I've always come to a dead end.
Argón
The limits part for evaluating if it converges or diverges is fine. I'm having trouble with the integration
not sure if this function has a nice integral
@frozen geode Has your question been resolved?
@frozen geode what level of education are you in?
This question looks like it might be solvable with Feynman's Technique (but that was with sin(x)/x and I've never learnt or used it myself so I can't be sure).
Otherwise, the closest thing I can think of is to use complex analysis
where you try to do this as a chosen contour in the complex plane and try to use Cauchy's Theorem/Cauchy Residue's Theorem etc. to find this real integral. But this requires you've learnt a lot of complex analysis knowledge. If you've never learnt it then this method is not recommended
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Decide which of the statements regarding the solution of the equation log3(6x−2)log3(x−3)=2
is correct.
Question 9Select one:
a.
None of the remaining possibilities is correct.
b.
The sum of all solutions is 12.
c.
The equation has two solutions and their product is 10.
d.
The equation has one solution.
e.
The equation has no solution.
@timid silo Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
yuh hello, i cant wrap my head around this 😭
uhhh theyre parallel?
yuhhh
yeaa
they are parallel
meaning that these 2 angles must add up to what?
these ones
they do
180
yea
yeahh
whats the angle on the top then
104
yea correcct
leme draw a new one
okokok
the pic is small to draw on
^
mhm, so what do we know about the angles in an isosceles triangle
OHHH TWO ARE THE SAME
the ones at the base right?
YEAHHH
combining that with the knowledge that angles in a triangle add up to 180, can you find the two angles in it?
yeah that works
38
these are 38, since they are comgruent like you said
since its an isoceles
now
mhm
ohhhhhhhhhh
and the bottom one is an unknown
ADDITION
THE BOTTOM MISSING ANGLE IS 80
but not the x
sooooo
76+80
then minus by 180
??
yea
WOOOOOOO
180-(76+80)
whats the final answer
correct
Closed by @spiral void
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
youre welcome
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how to find the minimum of the function $f(x) = \sqrt{(8-0.5x)^2+(x-4)^2} \times 60 + 50x$
General_Jacob
honestly i would just differentiate that
Differentiation
and how to solve this?
$\frac{1}{2} \times (8+0.5x+2(x-4)) \times (\sqrt{(8+0.5x)^2+(x-4)^2})^{-1} \times 60 + 50 = 0$
General_Jacob
@opaque mesa Has your question been resolved?
@opaque mesa Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi i need help please
what is the question?
@rugged mountain Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
ive tried to find the gradient of both functions and set them equal to each other but it said my answer was wrong. also that doesnt lead to two answers, so im really not sure what to do
Basically we are trying to look for such gradient that is orthogonal to the normal vector of the plane, right
im not sure, to be honest
because the final answer would be a point
or two points more specifically
the situation
yeah
i think i understand what the question is asking, jsut not how to go through with it
we need f_x f_y and f_z is my guess
yeah that would make the gradient, i just dont know what then to set it equal to
$\grad f = \begin{pmatrix} f_x \ f_y \ f_z \end{pmatrix}\$
$\ \begin{pmatrix} f_x \ f_y \ f_z \end{pmatrix} \cdot \begin{pmatrix} -4 \ 5 \ 4 \end{pmatrix} = 0\$
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
OHHH let me try that hold on
This would be a linear system
where would the second equation come from
scalar product
If our gradient vector is orthogonal to the normal vector
then it's parallel to the plane
like here orthogonal to the black normal vector would go along the blue plane (parallel basically)
so i got -16x+10y+40z=0 for the first one
i just did the dot product of the gradient of the surface and the gradient of the plane
can yoou tell me first you derivatives
f_x = 4x
f_y = 2y
f_z = 10z
and then i did g(x,y,z) for the plane so
g_x = -4
g_y = 5
g_z = 4
yeah thats what i put earlier
yea wait
hmm
what is next lemme think
my next step would be
to solve that for z
and plug that into 2x²+1y²+5z² = 1 for z
and then that would only leave x and y?
i would still need a system of equations since there are two unknowns
or
could i sub it into both f(x,y,z) and g(x,y,z) and then that could be my system?
that would be really nasty though it doesnt feel right
i would have like x and x^2 and xy and y^2 all at the same time
the point (0,0,0) is incorrect just checked
ofc it's incorrect
i just differentaited
i was just pointing out we dont have f_x, f_y and f_z to begin with
oh?
then it makes sense
yes
it's like
x² + y² = 1
here you treat y as a function of x
now analogically
z(x,y)
then solve for f_x YES
ok let's try it
so
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
do we do the same thing to the equation of the plane then?
ill tag you if i get it
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
We get y = 8x/5 basically
i got y=8x/5
multiply both sides by z
and then you have (8x/5)-y=0
so y=8x/5
oh yes
but then how do we find x and z is my question
so
if we substitute y for 8x/5 in the gradient
and then maybe we can choose x
and z
then we got one gradient
and plug in x and z into the original equation to get y
i will check it
but the gradient is a vector so how would substitute
or rather how would substituting help
unfortunately no 😭
weird
i think we need a second contraint
I subbed this into y=8x/5 intial equation and we get a circle solution
but that's not quiet it
yet
im honestly completely lost at this point LOL
we still have the derivatives
to get the tangent plane of f
$z = f_x(x-x_0) + f_y(y-y_0) + z(x_0,y_0)$
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
$-4x + 5y + 4z = 9 \iff z = x-\frac{5y}{4}+\frac{9}{4}$
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
@grizzled meteor Has your question been resolved?
still on it
youre good! im working on some other problems lol
nope
no idea LOL
but the point is in the equation
also i got more than 2 points so that's even weirder
yeah i really dont know
oh wait
sorry that was my mistake
the original z was correct i just accidentally put 181 instead of 905
yup
wait
I want to send my work so you can see what I did
i did a bit of research
but that wasnt enough
had to improvise
i really hope i never see a problem like that again but just in case id def like to see your work haha
it's not the problem but the fucking numbers
So our intial thoughts were correct, actually
to find the gradient of F we differentiate everything partially actually
Then now comes the trick
since we have the gradient
of F
the normal vector of our gradient has to be the same as the normal vector of our given plane to for some constant k
that constant k is very important
because if were to equate without a k like previously we wont find solutions
so we want to find such k so that everything is satisfied in our system
now the difficult part was k
in other problems sometimes x = 0 or y = z or some shit
so i didn't know what to do next since i got everything in terms of k
so i plugged instead k into F to get k lol
so i think what i really did was find such k so that i find the matching gradient
yeah yeah
then i got x and y which i need
and you get z by plugging in x and y from the gradient into F
and that's it
jesus christ
its been 2 hours exactly by the way 😭
that's nothing
i had worse especially when i didnt was on the level i am now lol
or had a helper
but i also learnt something new
so should i close it now?
you can if that's it x)
that should be it for now hahaha
thanks for your help its been nice hanging out with you lol
.close
Closed by @grizzled meteor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how would i convert this parametric equation into polar form, where it's r = something
so x=5+2.5cos(t), y=3+4.5sin(t)
[(x-5)/2.5]^2+[(y-3)]/4.5]^2=1
then x=rcos(theta), y=rsin(theta)
could maybe work something from there 
i used r^2 = x^2 + y^2 to get to this
was t a stand in for theta?
yes
ah, ignore my stuff then
it wasnt working with theta
i dont thnik i need to include the translation so i think it would be fine to just have it as (3.5cos(t), 4.5sin(t))
oh
well i asked my teacher and he said that its fine if i just consider it without translation when converting
so if it was just (3.5cos(t), 4.5sin(t)) how would the converting work
how you did it
because i just did the x = 3.5cos(t), y = 4.5sin(t), x^2 + y^2 = r^2
yeah but its slightly off for some reason ☹️
try it without ignoring the translation
no its like way off 💀
oh wow
i think ignoring the translation is best
this is what im confused about
because it should work right
any ideas?
just having a think
alr
YEAH EXACTLY 😭
maybe desmos problem?
approximation
probably not desmos is pretty good
huhhh
how did you get it to be a point
ohhhh
nvm
you set the inside to t
oh it does align
oohhhhh
wow tysm
ig it just isnt visible when still
ok thank you for everything
how do i close this
.close
Closed by @cedar oracle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone explain how he got to T1 = 8sin50/sin70?
@lusty spruce Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @lusty spruce
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, when doing mathematical induction, would it be possible to do P(k - 1) -> P(k) instead?
Base case would remain the same. But I assume the Induction Hypothesis would differ?
In this case, rather than 1^3 + 2^3 .... n ^3 = n^2 * (n+1)^2/4 , it would be (n-1)^2 * (n^2) / 4?
it would be the same really, but then i would think u'd have to show 1 more of the sequence after P(1) or 0 or whatever the 1st one is but idk
kk thanks
ight be thanks :)))
but I think im proving LHS, so wouldnt RHS stay the same ?
so no (n+1)^3 ?
(i have almost no idea of what im doing)
like why is there (n+1)^3 on the right ? I dont really get that part
induction u need to use (assume) P(k) is true to prove P(k+1) is true, u need to use P(n) in some way
yea I tried doing that but it is more complicated with the binomials
RHS is (n+1)^2(n+2)^2/4
yea but thats if you started with assumption of P(k) tho right
since I did P(k-1), then I would have normal "fomrula" on the right
ok so we chilling then I think
yea this is just practice so far
exam markers want to see easy layouts that they can skim through
and they dont want to have to double check if ur other method is correct or not
oof yikes LOL
maybe ill just stick with k + 1 then
yea better be safe than sorry
Closed by @knotty locust
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Just needed reassurance : >
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
am i right with everything here
i know the first pic is kinda blurry but its the best i could do
please let me know
<@&286206848099549185>
the whole process looks correct
thank you so much
@flat rune Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
need help verifying this
Do you know your trig identities?
only some
This could be useful
in class we were taught pythag identities, reciprocal identities, even odd identities
and we can only use those for now
ya
@granite dome
ok try rationalize the eqn
by multiplying and divideing by sint+cost+1
so just multiply by conjugates on num and denom?
ye
to get squared functions
take conjugate of denom
ye
use proper use of parenthesis generally during rationalizing you get a^2-b^2 format and (a-b)^2 or (a+b)^2 format
not getting you
because the conjugate of the numerator is equal to the denominator and the conjugate of the denominator is equal to the numerator would they end up being the same when u multiply it out
ye u are right but once we get in terms of higher degree it might be easier to cancel each other out
i told you the method of rationalizing cuz both are conjugate of each other
uhh i see just one sec i will tell you about this in detail
ima show my work one sec
tysm
you should multiply and divide by same conjugate
oh
you have just made the equation equal to one lol
anyone will do try denom
the conjugate should only change the sign of the one, not the trig functions yea?
explain what u mean
i could be wrong, but i did get the correct answer. conjugate of sinx+cosx-1 is sinx+cosx+1
just as the conjugate of -sinx-cos-1 would be -sinx-cosx+1
isn't the conjugate just changing the signs in between terms
i'm not familiar with trinomial conjugates but i'm pretty sure it would function the same way as binomial conjugates where the signs just change
as long as you only change 1 sign
oh
yes that
did not know that
wait what
that's the denom right
i'm just gonna try it
i'm gonna multiply by (sint+cost+1)
sorry for bad handwriting
here i have taken conjugate of denom then multiplied and divided it
then on numerator i have written in terms of (sint+1)+cost
in denom (sint+cost)+1
i think you have some missing terms
i did this since its easier to use (a-b)(a+b)=a^2-b^2 property
i dont think so
NICEU
now do you see in the denom we have sin^2+cos^2?
set equal to 1?
ye
then that will get rid of 1 right
yes
👍
now next step is little hard to see but if we use some trial and error of substituing we can cancel out 2 on numerator and denominator
in numerator we can write sin^2t as 1-cos^2t
one sec
not really sure how this leads to the answer
just one minute
you forgot one +1 term on numrator
oh ya
yup
you again forgot that one
here after you add +1 to num you get +2
just trace back to this step add +1 on num
ok did it
identity right
ye
sin^2t
yep
np
after the last test my grade tanked from 91 to 86
trignometric simplication is about trial and error
i got a 66 on an inverse trig test 😭
ya
alright bro take care
.close
Closed by @granite dome
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i need help understanding what a question is asking
ill send it one sec
i know about span and stuff
like i understand what i means
i just dont know what this question is asking me to do
i got the right answer
i kinda guessed though
i just thought that its basically s times (-5 1 -5)
and put that in
@brave moon Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @brave moon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How would I take the curl of this expression
the curl is in terms of spatial derivatives, just chug that?
But to me I'd need to specify the components along which the wave travels?
\vec r is just the position vector no?
does the euclidean basis not work for this problem
try it
@sinful crest Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do you do this
what have you tried
all i know is that i cna move it to 1/cos(x+45) =1
right
cause tis the recipricole
i usually work in radians its why im confused
.close
Closed by @red badge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi
hello
anything you need help with?
@south olive Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
@timid silo Has your question been resolved?
sqrt(x^2) = abs(x)
@timid silo Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @fluid sandal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi guys i have a question
sooooo
so what?
when u add two sides of a triangle it should be larger than the third side right?
yes