#help-10
1 messages · Page 336 of 1
its x + y = 85 btw my bad
i forgot to multiply the 2 that i got from the 4 square root with the 2 from the formula
oh
now i just do the thing
ok
ok now i have (x-y) . 85
i know that √ x - √ y is 9
ohh
its 85 squared?
the answer
can u solve it real quick and verify my answer
√x - √y = 9
And x . y = 4
Find √x³ - √y ³
i mean 85 . 87
not 85 squared
i looked at the wrong side of paper
wait i just want to know something
is (√x - √y)² equal to (x-y)
oh its not
dang
i really got it messed up
im stuck here
can i relate (x-y) with the information √ x - √ y = 9
.close
Closed by @dire nimbus
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help solve this
@old wadi Has your question been resolved?
@old wadi Has your question been resolved?
@old wadi Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @old wadi
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
aw u coulda just used cosine rule
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi! Trying to find the exact place Frechet constructs this embedding, a couple searches through the referenced paper yielded nothing
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kuratowski_embedding
In mathematics, the Kuratowski embedding allows one to view any metric space as a subset of some Banach space. It is named after Kazimierz Kuratowski.
The statement obviously holds for the empty space.
If (X,d) is a metric space, x0 is a point in X, and Cb(X) denotes the Banach space of all bounded continuous real-valued functions on X with the...
paper in question is https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF03018603
Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo Series 1 -
Have seen multiple sources refer to this paper, but annoyingly not with any more specific locator (so this is probably not a wiki problem)
And lecture notes for a different course I'm taking refers to the finite-dimensional version of this as the "Frechet embedding"
Checking mathscinet yields two reviews by Hahn, checking if he mentioned anything
Nope, not as far as I can tell
<@&286206848099549185> , do you mind?
@sacred siren Has your question been resolved?
Possible sighting: Item 51, part 2 of the theorem
We consider $\epsilon_p=\inf_kd(A_p,A_k)$ for a sequence $A_k\in E$ a metric space
gesh (on break)
hrm. doesn't seem to be going anywhere near an embedding
OK, so Item 62 defines a sequence space with a weighted pointwise bounded l1 metric
Item 68 seems to be defining $\ell^\infty$, and not liking it:
- because for the norm to be well-defined we need to limit ourselves to bounded sequences
- because it is very incomplete -- the subspace ${0,1}^\mathbb{N}$ has no limit points in it
gesh (on break)
Closed by @sacred siren
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Calc 2
Closed by @forest lake
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I just need a reminder on how to get the derivative, we started introduction to differentiation recently
What does the h stand for again?
a small change in x
that small change becomes infinitely small
(f(x+h) - f(x))/h is the 'steepness' in y, for that small change in x
Closed by @gritty bloom
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
need help with simple integration
oof ok let me think about this on my own its been a while since i did calc
power rule as in int (x^2)dx = (x^3)/2 +c
.close
Closed by @abstract solstice
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help solving this question. I am aware of a solution that uses Schwarz's Reflection Principle but I believe that I am expected to solve it without that result. I have deduced that f(0)=0 and am trying to show the coefficients of all even powers in the power series expansion is 0 but am having no luck
@warm quarry Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @warm quarry
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i'm prolly being stupid here but... if we just take the n=1 case (so f(x) = Qx^2 with Q>0) the inequality is equivalent to ||2Q(x-y)|| <= Q||x-y|| right? but that's false?


I can help if you wait for me to study real analysis 
ok i'll keep it open until then 
i think in this case, youd have to take Q = L > 0
to my head that a constant is its own eigenvalue seems ... right
oh wait
i see what you mean 
i noted Q > 0 already in my original message but that doesn't even matter
yea i get the problem youre saying

@zenith raft Has your question been resolved?
is that L in the question meant to be the eigenvalue or just the lipschitz coeff
then certainly that's just wrong
should be f(x) = 1/2 x^TQx or something
welp the deadline already passed and i'm doing this so late so not sure how nobody pointed this out already and it didn't get corrected
probably. if not that then maybe the square root. but what's up there looks wrong fs
this is odd lol
then i like how this part has a 1/2 when it's completely unnecessary
like there's no issue with it there but the problem would make just as much sense and the answer be just as significant without it
but now idk if i should answer this one as if f(x) = 1/2 x^TQx or as it is written in the problem

.close
Closed by @zenith raft
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
tried 56/98 * 42/97
@ripe hazel Has your question been resolved?
huh ill try
Closed by @ripe hazel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Help
What's the problem?
No
The route is same and the driver goes faster than usual so don't u think it will take less time than usual?
Assume he goes with a speed of xkm/hr usually
Ooooo yes i didnt think of it like that
Ok
I’m doing same question yeah that makes sense
Write the second equation
270/x+6). + 1/2?
Can I do this: 270/x= 270/(x+6)+1/2?
Exactly
What happens from here @tacit pewter
I think @jaunty wadi has a question
Help if a pipe can empty a swimming pool 20hrs and another pipe can fill the pool in 32 hours would it be -x/20 +x/32
Ask where didn't u understand it
Sorry my wifi cut out I get the other question
Lemme think
What's the equation for?
Solving rational equations
What's the complete question
That is it
Oh wait it’s not but I’m just asking
The question is the part before
Can I do -x/20 + x/32 = 1
How long would it take for the pool to drain
Oh
Is it right
It seems that you posted this question twice, but I don't know if you looked but I gave you the answer for it, and I am convinced it's right.
Were you not satsified with my answer, or do you think that it's stupid?
@surreal bone Has your question been resolved?
x+y=12 implies that x=y-12
Why is it 1/x - 1/(12-x) and not 1/(12-x) - 1/x
U can use both?
Yes
If you do the first equation that means x>y
Sorry x<y
What is y?
So I got to do both ways if I get like a negative first time?
Wdym
Wdym
$a + b = 12$\
$\frac{1}{a} - \frac{1}{b} = \frac{2}{9}$
Roman_Garland
$a, b = ?$
If i do b+a
Roman_Garland
Wdym
$a + b = 12$\
$\frac{1}{a} - \frac{1}{b} = \frac{2}{9}$\
Here, find a and b
Roman_Garland
K
Yes.
One sec
Okay i got answer
For doing 1/x first
Answer key says two pairs possible
Ok
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
@surreal bone Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i need help with fractions
hello?

i have yet to see said fractions
its hard to help if you don't post specific questions
@swift valve Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what's the difference between y = kx + m and y = mx + k?
i see people use both and i dont understand the difference
there is no difference, they are just different choices of which letters represent which numbers
there's also even y = ax+b in some places
they're the same thing, just with different variables
.close
Closed by @delicate tartan
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can a circular motion occur without jerk?
Because I heard centripetal acceleration is always towards centre which means it has to be changing direction continuously which means jerk ≠0
Acceleration can be constant in circular motion
Do you have an example
Acceleration is change in velocity, that includes changing direction
but if velocity changes direction, the one responsible for the change is centripetal acceleration and I was taught that it's always toward the centre, so being a vector, won't the direction of centripetal acceleration be changing as well?
what about earth orbiting the sun? assuming it's always same speed
The force (hence acceleration) is always acting towards the center of the circle of the motion
And if at any one instance I draw centripetal acceleration, I would draw it towards sun and at another instance I would do same...I would notice that centripetal acceleration is changing direction
Yes
But acceleration is vector so it's not constant in direction
From the frame of reference of the moving body its always in the same direction
Ohh
That's true
Wait, from the reference of moving body, I would see the sun instead revolving around earth and again it will not be in same direction
So does that mean acceleration can never be constant in circular motion ?
Non inertial reference frames are whack from whatever I remember. Acceleration in one frame may not appear as acceleration in another
Yeah
So I have studied they applied pseudo force
Still I can not imagine how would it be like
Thank you both btw
.close
Closed by @west sierra
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how did they get A=1/4
dividing the equation 1 = 4A by 4
(1+1²)² = 2² = 4
Then i dont understand your question buddy
how are they putting 1 in equation number 2
1-x=0…. x=-1
oh
☠️
btw how did they write A-B with x4 when x4 is only with A
there is also the term Bx^4 by expanding the second term
Closed by @silent furnace
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi
I need help

Closed by @dark hedge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Trapezium is all u going to do in the exam tmrw?
Ohh wow hi
And midpoint
It's a unit test?
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what does the notation in yellow mean?
Ok
oh
yh it is im sure
yes i do
And about the expansion of sin(x) ?
Okay. So O(N) is called as the big O notation which determines the speed at which a code (or generally, a proces) is being run. When we use a for loop, the big O will be O(n), a linear rate, due to the for loop being a linear function (it executes one iteration at a time).
Now if you expand sin(1/n) in terms of taylor series, the first term is 1/n. So you use the definition of limits to prove that it converges at a rate of O(n).
Note here that O(n) does not have anything to with the value of N in it. O(N) simply indicates what behaviour a process is following. If it is logarithmic, it will be O(logn). That's it. Nothing much
oh i see
ok so does O(whatever) just tell as how quickly something coverges basically?
so O(1/n) would converge faster than O(logn)?
👍
.close
Closed by @shell oar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
something just doesnt work for big numbers here. maybe there is no limit but im having hard time to prove it
nope
and tried it still and it made it so much worse
wait
maybe I can make it work for the denominator
no nvm it doesnt work
yup
but the numerator is also approching inf but still after about 140 it starts to break for some reason
PajamaMamaLlama
im listening
The point is you can ignore the 3^x
for signficiantly large x x^x+3^x -> x^x
ok not a problem. it approches infinity either way
After some algebra what you have is $\left(\frac{x+4}{x}\right)^x-\left(\frac{x-4}{x}\right)^x$
To formalise this notion, just factor out an x^x and do whatever you want to do
PajamaMamaLlama
yes i see this
this is simply the limit definition of e^x
oooooooh i under stand i think
$\left(1+\frac{4}{x}\right)^x-\left(1+\frac{-4}{x}\right)^x$
PajamaMamaLlama
i cant remember the limit definition by heart though
$e^x=\lim_{n\to\infty}\left(1+\frac{x}{n}\right)^n$
PajamaMamaLlama
so your limit is e^4-e^(-4) :)
yes thats more or less what I remembered
for significantly large x, (x+4)^x - (x-4)^x is also infinity so just because it approaches infinity is not a reason to believe this, you have to see that while it is true it approaches infinity, which infinity it is
x^x + 3^x not just approaches infinity, but it's an infinity that in itself approaches x^x is what you should think
yes ofc. just because the numeretor and denominator approach infinity that doesnt say much about the limit of the whole function
its a little more complex
.close
Closed by @astral grove
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Which is the answer for the question 6?
My reasoning was to subtract the number of possibilites that may contain queens with the number of possibilities that doesn't contai queens, so I arrived at the solution: (52!/47!)-(48!/43!)
Is it correct?
Do you know the actual answer ?
Of course this is wrong
No the book doesnt show it
For somereaso the book just show the answers for the odd numbered questions
52!/47! is all the cases possible ($52C5*5!$)
Solomaniac
and 48!/47! is all the cases when there is NO queen.
This means the subtraction will yield all the cases when there is ATLEAST one queen
We want EXACTLY one queen
That is $4C1 * 48C4 * 5!$
Solomaniac
What is C
Solomaniac
Do you want me to explain it properly ?
@elder vortex Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @elder vortex
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi
@ornate merlin Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@queen sand Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @queen sand
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
whats the limit as x approaches 0 of tan^2 3x / sin^2 2x? you're only allowed to solve it using trig limits
every time i do it i get 1/4 and the actual answer is 9/4
!showwork
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
for tan^2(3x)
divide and multiply with 9x^2
lim x to 0 tan x/x is 1
similarly for sin^2(2x) , divide and multiply with 4x^2
lim x to 0 sin x/x is 1 too
9x^2/4x^2 = 9/4
how did you make 3x/cos 3x tend to 1?
i used the denominator of 3x/3x for the sin3x to make it equal 1 and i used the numerator of that fraction to get 3x/cos3x
ye so what happened to 3x/cos(3x) then?
how did it turn to 1?
the 3x cancelled the 3x and then it was 1/cosx
and cosx is equal to 1
wdym?
how did it become 1/cos x?
Bro did u solve it or need help?
solved it but he has issue in his solution
here's his solution
when i multiplied sin3x by 3x/3x i used the denominator of the fraction for sin3x and then i used the numerator of 3x/3x for 3x/cos3x
yeah my calculus teacher sucks
i've been teaching it to myself
yes , then what happened to the 3x/cos(3x) next?
Examples
i don't have any text books
my high school can't afford them i think lol
Bruh don’t rely on internet buy books hard printed
Mark your mistakes using pencil
i cancelled the 3x of the 3x/cos3x to get 1/cosx
So u don’t repeat it
i dont money for that stuff
is that haram
Bro
does allah not allow you to do that
or u can just "find" pdfs of books :)
U need trigonometry
you can't cancel the arguments of a trignometric function with a function outside omg
math allah is not proud rn
its an angle
Nah there’s a reason libraries still exist
ITS BEEN A LONG TIME SINCE I DID MATH OK
yeah but he just said he doesnt have the money to buy books
chill
why can i cancel the sin3x with 3x then!?!
it doesn't work like tha
you don't cancel them
oh
There’s a reason you read the Quran from a book not a pdf while praying
i've been doing this completely wrong then
Use library
i whip out my amazon kindle and start reading from there
Ayush , what college are you in?
how do you make sin3x/1 equal 1 then?
I’m not in college
lim x tending to 0 sin(x)/x is 1
your profile says undergrad
ik but what about the 3x?
In which I am
because its sin3x/x not sinx/x
Do u know u can expand sin 3 x and take sin x common
@quaint bone
wdym?
Oh no 😭
my math teacher is horrible
bhai tu shaant hoja @karmic ridge
i know nothing
chill
i learn calculus from the organic tutor on youtube
listen
Tu hi bata de
He’s good
for your question
which is lim x tending to 0 tan^2(3x)/sin^2(2x)
you see the tan^2(3x) part?
mhm
yo guys can someone help me with a question please
Yes
Open a new help room
so that tan^2(3x)/(3x)^2 tends to 1
Question 8 a i
and the 9x^2 remains intact
How do I open a new help room
similalry for the sin^2(2x)
we divide and multiply with (2x)^2 i.e. 4x^2
when sin^2(2x)/(2x)^2 tends to 1
Go to suggested channel section send a hi
and the other (2x)^2 remains intact
so now its 9x^2/4x^2
now as x tends to 1
its 9/4
Wait what I can't find it 😆
Just tell me what you got please
Take the one in side the root = t^2
yes please
thats what I did
@karmic ridge
how do i write all of this out?
i understand the math now but idk how to write it
oh I used u instead of t
Same same but difflent
and also I made the entire square root equal to u (or t)
I got 2u^5/2/45 + 8u^3/2/27
ok one sec
its taking a long time
@karmic ridge sorry bro it's taking a long time
@quaint bone Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @quaint bone
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi help
i dont get how we can deduce the 8 in camping and the 6 in hotels
ping me when you answer
@karmic ridge forget it, my computer is too slow
nuh uh 😠
Bro
sorry bro -- maybe tommorow
because my computer is very slow bro, very sorry indeed
bro get out of my help channel, delete your messages
@native oasis
@karmic ridge
now the pictures are far away
yo bro how do you make a help channel in the first place
wdym
just chat in the help channels that are available
oh ok
those are available
as soon as you send a message it will be put at your name
now help me
@native oasis
how we can deduce the 8 in camping and the 6 in hotels
no
@fickle nymph Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Need helping determing how much more Markos made
box plot
I know markos made more
but it seems like I'm having trouble caculating how many more markos made
@wispy acorn Has your question been resolved?
Lmao
@wispy acorn Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
ok its like a big curly bracket { bc EC^2 - CD^2 is DE^2 (pythagoras)
apologies for the even blurrier image
@kindred basalt Has your question been resolved?
what else was the question?
so de^2 = ec^2 - cd^2 bc of pythag
and then i just swap around with the equation abovei
to prove the question
yeah the triangle above shows that ec^2 - cd^2 = de^2
so you can replace it
and then it is the equation you need to prove
Closed by @kindred basalt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@kindred slate Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$x^2+x-2$
factor
putridplanet
$x^2+2x-1x-2$
putridplanet
putridplanet
Dyk about vieta’s
It’s super overkill
But could be good if you wanna expand past deg 2
Polynomials
@long hedge Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @long hedge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
the textbook says the answer is false and I'm not sure how to prove it
if this is false then all you need is a counterexample
consider the definition of D_vf
check the definition in your textbook
I can't find a definition for either of those in the book
that is surprising
as far as I understand Du_f = the dot product between the gradient at a point and (v/IIvII)
but Dv_f and Dv/IIvII are completely new to me
@maiden trail Has your question been resolved?
@maiden trail Has your question been resolved?
@maiden trail Has your question been resolved?
you should consult the definitions in the textbook (assuming this is a question from the textbook)
this kind of question is wholly dependent on the definition they use
@maiden trail Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
MINE
no
cause of the commutative property ik
but
order still matters
💀💀
Multiplicand comes first
like how much does the order matter
how much does the order matter, coz when i think it matters, i get confused since it shouldnt matter coz of the commutative property but u can calculate faster sometimes w a specific order so it does matter?
True
Multiplication (often denoted by the cross symbol ×, by the mid-line dot operator ⋅, by juxtaposition, or, on computers, by an asterisk *) is one of the four elementary mathematical operations of arithmetic, with the other ones being addition, subtraction, and division. The result of a multiplication operation is called a product.
The multiplica...
it is second
wdym
it does matter cause u can calculate faster sometimes w a specific order
Who is “you”
“You” is relative
Maybe you calculate faster 25x7 doing one direction and i do faster the other direction
..
bro samuel u just macde me more confused and i dont trust u anymore as u got the order wrong
wdym
noo
like, 77x5x2 is faster calculated as 77 x 10, not 385 x 2 (not my eg)
I didn't get the order wrong
Your country has different order of calling the things
again, it depends on the country
anyways, that's not the important thing about your question
yes
as I told you, your capabilities to multiply faster in a specific order depends on you
wiki is same for everyone doe
i mean 385 is a bigger number
oooooook
.close
Closed by @crisp swallow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
If the determinant is = 0 in a 3x3 matrix. Does that imply that there exists no inverse?
yes
1 0 1
0 1 1
1 1 0
This was the matrix i was given but i got the determinant to 0
However the book says it's possible to find the inverse of that
the determinant is not 0
$1(10-11) -0(00-11)-1(01-11)$
Merineth
= 0
https://youtu.be/YvjkPF6C_LI?t=89 I tried applying this method to find the determinant
Thanks to all of you who support me on Patreon. You da real mvps! $1 per month helps!! :) https://www.patreon.com/patrickjmt !! Please consider supporting me on Patreon! Be a Patron of Mathematics! https://www.patreon.com/patrickjmt?ty=h
Finding the Inverse of a 3 x 3 Matrix using Determinants and Cofactors - Example 1. Besides using row red...
-2
this matrix
transforms the standard basis vectors in R3
scales them all by sqrt(2)
don’t trust these christian matrix propaganda videos
why?
never mind that video is fine
so the effect on the volume of the parallelopiped that they form is going to scaling by 2
that is too advanced for me to understand lol
dont mind my buddy he is a little paranoid
Closed by @fallow widget
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
the thumbnail looks like they are blessing the matrix or something
it goes to a different size cube
one that is 2 times bigger
that's the idea
the matrix takes it there
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
uh
i am no math expert
but can i get a yes or no
this, is the equation i copied and gave to ai
and it solved it while the website said its unsolvable
idk if it made any mistakes ( i am dumb )
AI says a lot of stuff which seems reasonable
doesnt mean that it is correct
you cannot trust it
i know, i am a dev.... testing it
your AI will not have solved an unsolved problem within 5 seconds
it doesnt help that you wrote 2(2^127)-1 instead of 2^(2^127)-1
your AI probably just looked at the first one. which isnt prime obviously
because its a difference of squares
@inner basin Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @inner basin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
not sure how to show 5c
im not too sure if i can use this formula specifically for c
Is tan^-1 arctan or cot?
arctan
$$\tan^{-1}(\frac{1}{7}) + \frac{1}{4}\pi = \tan^{-1}(\frac{1}{7}) - \tan^{-1}(\frac{-1}{1})$$
$$\theta_u = tan^{-1}(\frac{4}{3})$$
Rub05
You have to proof that $\theta_u = \theta_z - \theta_w$
Rub05
should i use the same formula
Rub05
.close
Closed by @candid yarrow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
Sorry
It looks like dots that slope towards the x axis
slope?
they should all be inside the real line
Its for 1/k where k are integers
Yes
So they would have discrete representation on each integer value
well, this is what I get
yeah
so, is it open?
no
@lofty hare Has your question been resolved?
and is it closed?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi
Could I please get help with this
Why is the answer that
Shouldn’t it be 3x + 2y = 20
You need 4 strips of length y because there are 4 vertical strips in the diagram?
Why 20?
Because there are 20m of strips total (first two words of problem)
where did you get this answer from?
Oh, I see now
@hardy gale Has your question been resolved?
Why isn’t it 6x then
where did you get this answer from?
It's 3x because there are 3 horizontal strips
no, there are 6
There’s 6
There’s also 2 vertical strips
OK, I'm not seeing 6 in that diagram, just 3.
Well, 4 vertical strips since you count the ones on the left and right side
Oh, a strip goes all the way across. The thing where it says x refers to the entire strip going across, not just the middle section
Wdym
The top strip goes across three windows per row
And what about y
each strip goes from top to bottom (2 windows) and there are 4 of them
@hardy gale Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Mr x can walk up either 1 step or 2 at a time , he needs to walk up to 16th step but should not step on the 8th one how many ways

totally, how many ways can he go up the stairs
how many ways can he get to the 8th step?
uh
how many ways can he get from the 8th step to the 16th?
im laying out the number of ways and it gets messy
see if you can put all of that together
ok
the total
i think im doing it long way
Case1 16 1 steps 0 2 steps
Case 2 14 1 steps, 1 (2 steps)
And permuting so so
This is too lengthy
ok is ir
It
The 1st one
1 + 15c1 + 14c2 + 13c3 + 12c4 + 11c5 + 10c6 + 9c7 + 8c8
Idk how to sum these is there a formula
@chilly scroll Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @chilly scroll
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i got d(lnx)/dx as ln(1+1/x) using first principle, is it correct and is there any other way to solve it?
that's not right
how did you get that
if you used the first principle , you forgot to do something with the h in the denominator
that's why it's wrong
ngl i think they got multiple things wrong
hmm
i'm not sure binomial approximation necessarily works if the power is changing
lemme think
because the second coefficient would be like
(1/h)(1/h - 1)/2 * (h/x)^2 which doesn't go to 0
non-trivial
so i don't think you can use binomial approximation here
hint: (1 + 1/x)^x
i dont get u
do you know what $\lim_{x \to \infty} \left(1 + \frac{1}{x}\right)^x$ is
Kaisheng21
but i have an x multiplied to the 2nd term
sure
but try and make it into something of the same form
for example
$\left(1 + \frac{h}{x} \right)^{\frac{1}{h}} = \left(1 + \frac{1}{\frac{x}{h}} \right)^{\frac{1}{h}}$
Kaisheng21
anything?
yeah i don't think i would have necessarily gotten that if i hadn't seen it before
well, maybe
Closed by @twilit meteor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
wait can u allso give me a hint on how tofind indefinite integral of lnx
IBP
for that one you just IBP
i havent learnt that
by parts
is there another way
yea i havent learnt that yet
yeah idk then
Why am. I here
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
lmao funny that the prrson asking the doubt sends this
yea
yeah that would work
dy
that requires IBP
can be done without that, i just did
so you know whats special about e^x
derivative of e^x is itself so integration is too
d/dy (y.e^y - e^y) is exactly what we have
yea
and you got e^y y in your question
so u get x(lnx-1)
