#help-10

1 messages · Page 267 of 1

ruby flame
#

then

latent walrus
#

what?

#

what is (sqrt(2))^2

ruby flame
#

Oh that suppose to be a 3

latent walrus
#

there shouldnt be a sqrt2 under it anyway, the dot is multiplication

latent walrus
ruby flame
#

So

#

i would this

#

208

latent walrus
#

why have you changed a minus into a multiplication

latent walrus
ruby flame
#

You said the dot is multiplying

latent walrus
#

im referring to the one after 13 root2

ruby flame
latent walrus
ruby flame
latent walrus
#

so what is (sqrt(2)^2)^3 * sqrt(2)

ruby flame
#

8 root 2

latent walrus
#

yes

#

so what is the answer

ruby flame
#

5 root 2

latent walrus
#

theres your answer

#

finit

ruby flame
#

Thank you

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@ruby flame Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

chilly crater
#

Need help pls

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

Please don't occupy multiple help channels.

chilly crater
#

?

vast willow
#

Ok so you know derivatives??

chilly crater
#

Nope

vast willow
#

Ok no problem

chilly crater
#

K

#

??

native inlet
#

do you know the formula for the vertex of a parabola?

chilly crater
#

Oo that

vast willow
#

So you are working examples on completing squares ?

chilly crater
#

Yh

#

Completing squares

#

Now??

#

@vast willow

vast willow
#

What did you get after completing squares

chilly crater
#

Not sure

vast willow
#

Do you know how to complete square

chilly crater
#

Complete the square
-5x^2 +80x=s

#

??

vast willow
#

No

chilly crater
#

Then for

#

S=5x^2+80x=5

#

??

#

@vast willow

vast willow
#

Wdym =5

chilly crater
#

Sry s

vast willow
#

What's s too

#

max distance ?

chilly crater
#

Yh

#

S=80t-5t^2

#

What equation

#

Then?

#

@vast willow

vast willow
#

Wait follow me

chilly crater
#

Alright

vast willow
#

80t-5t² you want to complete squares

#

So remember first that (a-b)²=a²-2ab+b²

chilly crater
#

K

#

Then

vast willow
#

Then look at 80t-5t²

#

Now 80t should be in the form of 2ab if you compare it with the one above

chilly crater
#

Okay

vast willow
#

Wait I made a typo

#

First take -5 as a common factor what do you get

chilly crater
#

16

vast willow
#

No

chilly crater
#

..

vast willow
#

You are taking -5 common factor from 80t-5t²

chilly crater
#

O

vast willow
#

So 80t-5t²=-5(...)

chilly crater
#

S= -5

#

Ohk

#

T^2-16t

vast willow
vast willow
#

So -5(t²-16t)

#

Now compare the inside of the paranthesese with a²-2ab+b²

#

You will notice that a=??

chilly crater
#

Hn

#

16

vast willow
#

t²-16 and a²-2ab+b² a=??

#

@chilly crater

chilly crater
#

T

vast willow
#

Correct

chilly crater
#

Ohkk

vast willow
#

And 2ab=?

chilly crater
#

16

vast willow
#

No

#

We already no that a=t

#

So 2ab=2bt

#

So 2ab=?

chilly crater
#

So not 16t

#

8

vast willow
chilly crater
#

Oohk

vast willow
#

Wait a sec

#

What is 8

#

You wrote 8 to refer to what

chilly crater
#

Not sure

vast willow
#

Then why did you say 8

chilly crater
#

I thought 2 x 8

#

Is 16

#

Something

#

Hn

vast willow
#

Look nvm

chilly crater
#

K

vast willow
#

So 2ab=16t did you understand why

chilly crater
#

Yh

vast willow
#

We have a²-2ab+b² we know that a² is t² we want to which of the other 2 refers to 16t

#

Since b² doesn't contain a in it then it doesn't have t

#

But 2ab on the other hand has a

#

So it has t

chilly crater
#

at

vast willow
#

So 2bt =16t

#

Thus b=??

chilly crater
#

8

vast willow
#

Great

chilly crater
#

Now

vast willow
#

Now what we want is to reach a form c(t-d)²+h

#

That's why we were talking about (a-b)²=a²-2ab+b²

chilly crater
#

-5(t-8)

vast willow
#

No

chilly crater
#

O nvm

vast willow
#

Wait dont be in a rush

chilly crater
#

Ok

vast willow
#

So we found out that a=t and b=8

#

So (a-b)²=(t-8)²=??

#

Expand

chilly crater
#

(T-8)^2 = t^2-16t+64

vast willow
#

Ok nice

#

We have t²-16t we are still missing +64 to get (t-8)²

#

To get this number we can simply add and subtract 64

#

So we are basically adding a version of 0 which doesn't change anything

chilly crater
#

Hm

vast willow
#

So we get -5(t²-16t+64-64)=-5((t-8)²-64)=-5(t-8)²+320

#

Is everything clear till now

chilly crater
#

Yh

vast willow
#

Ok nice

#

Now we got to the desired form

chilly crater
#

Hm

vast willow
#

Now look how does this form lead us to the solution

#

You have -5(t-8)²+320

chilly crater
#

Yh

vast willow
#

You want to maximize this

#

Now what's the sign of -5

chilly crater
#

A

vast willow
#

What's the sign of -5

chilly crater
#

Negative

vast willow
#

Ok what's the sign of (t-8)² for any t

chilly crater
vast willow
#

=0

#

It might be positive or 0 not just positive

chilly crater
#

Ok

vast willow
#

What's the sign of 320

chilly crater
vast willow
#

Ok

#

Now -5(t-8)² is either negative or 0 bc negative multiplied by positive gives negative and negative multiplied by 0 gives 0

chilly crater
#

Yh

vast willow
#

So there is no way to exceed 320

#

If -5(t-8)² is negative then -5(t-8)²+320<320

chilly crater
#

Yh so it's 0

vast willow
#

And if -5(t-8)²=0 then -5(t-8)²+320=320

chilly crater
#

Yh

vast willow
#

Now when is -5(t-8)²=0

#

For what value(s) of t

#

??

chilly crater
#

.

vast willow
#

?

vast willow
chilly crater
#

Yh

#

8

vast willow
#

Ok what is/are the solution(s)

vast willow
chilly crater
#

Hm

vast willow
#

Now for t=8 we reach the max distance

#

And we know that 0<8<16

#

We are done

chilly crater
#

That's it

#

Omg thank you so much

#

Bro

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@chilly crater Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @chilly crater

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

obtuse dust
obtuse pebbleBOT
obtuse dust
#

trying to find the cofunction in radians

#

i got sin 22.5pi/90 by

#

3(180)/8 getting 67.5, getting 90-67.5 to get 22.5 for the cofunction

#

so assuming thats all right trying to figure out a way to simplify sin 22.5pi/90

#

it twas not right that simplifies into pi/4 of course

#

so where did i mess up?

#

lol nvm 90 is supposed to be 180

#

its right

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @obtuse dust

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

light condor
obtuse pebbleBOT
light condor
#

hi people can I get some help with this

#

I graphed the 2 functions, what do I do after that

static marten
#

you know what (f∘g)x means?

light condor
#

yes

#

f(g(x))

static marten
#

so we just need g(f(3))

#

no need for graph because the information's there

light condor
#

ohhh okay

#

lol

#

so how do I find f(3)? I don't have the function, I need to make one?

#

I'm guessing y2-y1/x2-x1 isn't gonna work here

static marten
#

huh

#

it gives different points for f(x)

light condor
#

yes

#

what do I do with those

static marten
#

like (-3,8), (3,1)

#

and we want f(3) first

light condor
#

so um f(3) = (3, 1)?

static marten
#

f(3)=1

light condor
#

OH

#

okay

#

and then you do g(1)?

static marten
#

yeah

light condor
#

hmmmm

#

-1?

static marten
#

yeah

light condor
#

it's that simple?

static marten
#

yeah

light condor
#

okay I think I probably got the rest

#

you're the mvp chlamydia!

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @light condor

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

chrome crypt
#

Hi guys I am currently learning about application of derivatives and had a question on concavity, so I understand concavity, but to picturize it better I made up a scenario. Here is my idea. Lets say we have a wonky function with numerous turns where the Y axis represents Revenue relative to time. The goal is to sketch the function efficiently. If we had a humongous polynomial function it would be difficult as we would have to input numerous points to get an accurate representation of the graph which is not efficient. However if we take the first derivative and we will get information on the behavior of the function between certain intervals for when the derivative is equal to 0 or DNE. Now we come across a problem although we find the behavior of the function between certain intervals we could argue for each individual sector (interval) that the function can be drawn concave upwards or concave downwards and the behavior would remain the same. To understand whether or not its concave downward or concave upwards we need to take the second derivative which will give us the instantaneous rate of change of Revenue. Now throughout the function there exists a point where we have possible inflection points at f''0 or f'' DNE. Now after the possible inflection points we test points nearby the interval to observe the behavior of the slopes. If f'' > 0 I picturize as instanteous change in revenue being positive, so I think of that as our loss in revenue minimizing and becoming increasingly positive. If f'' < 0 the instataneous change in revenue is negative which means are losses will be increasing. After we conclude the concavity for all the intervals for f'', we can then determine the inflection points.

chrome crypt
#

The importance of inflection points is that if we think about it in terms of revenue we can determine the moment we start making positive revenue and the moment when revenue becomes negative.

#

I'd like some feedback. Perhaps I could have simplified what I wrote as it does seem a fair bit long, but in essence when we find the behavior of the function for intervals there are 2 arguments we can make, concave up or concave down and we cannot assume as it could be incorrect and we would be changing the data of the function which would lead to incorrect conclusions, this is where the concavity test is vital. I associate f'' > 0 in terms of revenue I picturize that as revenue becoming increasingly positive and f'' < 0 as our revenue dropping, instantaneous change in revenue negative, hence losing.

grizzled shore
#

First thing, polynomials are infinitely differentiable everywhere, so you never encounter a point where its derivative DNE

chrome crypt
#

I should have said functions my bad.

grizzled shore
#

Inflection points don’t determine the sign of the value

chrome crypt
#

I know that.

grizzled shore
#

It tells you when the sign of the rate of change change

chrome crypt
#

Its a transition point.

#

yeah I know that.

grizzled shore
chrome crypt
#

I know it doesn't tell you, but I was asking myself what is the importance of it asides from the fact that we know its it the transition stage where the f'' sign changes

grizzled shore
#

Sometimes we aren’t too concerned with the places it transitions

chrome crypt
#

and because we know that an inflection point must be continous and have concave upwards and concave downwards before and after the point. So I was questioning how can I apply it.

grizzled shore
#

A big use of the 2nd derivative is telling us if a critical point is a local min or max

chrome crypt
#

Basically what I do is a bit strange at times but I like to apply real world scenarios a lot, cus my goal is to retain the info.

grizzled shore
#

If it’s concave down it’s a max

#

If it’s concave up it’s a min

chrome crypt
grizzled shore
#

The sign of its concavity tells us the nature of critical points

chrome crypt
#

I have a question Frost I'd like to ask. I'd like you to tr and prod my analytical thinking to come up wit answer for the DNE.

#

Basically for the second derivative ik it says inflection point where f'' = 0 or DNE. I'm trying to think abt the DNE aprt and am thinking of a function where when we differentiate it from both left and right the derivatives don't match one another.

#

I'm just confused on pinpointing an exact function to show this, I can't think of one off the top of my head.

grizzled shore
#

,w graph y^3 = x from -5 to 5

chrome crypt
#

ahhh yes vertical tangent

grizzled shore
#

This function has an inflection point at x = 0

chrome crypt
#

Ooooooh thanks man.

grizzled shore
#

A more readily available example for 2nd derivatives is in physics

chrome crypt
#

i do love physics

grizzled shore
#

This is because the 2nd time derivative of position (given as a function of time) is acceleration

#

So you get a lot more problems regarding 2nd derivatives

chrome crypt
#

yeah i was thinking of using that scenario to explain concavity which helped.

#

One way that worked for me tho was thinking abt concavity in terms of revenue wit a wonky function.

grizzled shore
#

Well in SHM you have

#

$\ddot x = -k^2x$

chrome crypt
#

what is shm

warm shaleBOT
#

Frosst

chrome crypt
#

also r u using newtons notation for the derivative?

grizzled shore
#

Simple harmonic motion

#

No this is more common physics notation for time derivatives

#

Dots for time derivatives

chrome crypt
#

hmmmmm can I use higher order derivatives using Leibinz's notation?

grizzled shore
#

You can easily inspect that the acceleration is 0 when the object has position = 0

chrome crypt
#

Not familiar with harmonic motion.

grizzled shore
#

You can but physics uses a shorthand for time derivatives as they appear frequently

chrome crypt
#

Gotta learn that unit

grizzled shore
#

If I put something on a spring

#

And it moves or “bounces”

grizzled shore
#

It moves like this

chrome crypt
#

so ur analyzing the motion of the spring

#

hmmmm what comes to mind is sine waves and cos waves.

grizzled shore
#

Not the spring itself

#

But the actual particle on the spring

#

Or the end of the spring

chrome crypt
#

so if the particle is oscillating?

grizzled shore
grizzled shore
chrome crypt
#

that is rlly god damn cool.

grizzled shore
#

Simple harmonic motion is things oscillating

chrome crypt
#

so what abt ocean waves or ferris wheels?

grizzled shore
#

Same thing

#

Well

#

Ocean waves are more dimensions

#

The differential equation solution is writing x(t) = ???

grizzled shore
chrome crypt
#

Wow.

#

I am gonna defintely look into that.

grizzled shore
chrome crypt
#

I rlly like ur passion man. I too am passionate abt this, but a slow learner.

#

But I am very hardworking.

grizzled shore
#

Haha yeah this is all very fun and interesting stuff

chrome crypt
#

especially the proofs.

grizzled shore
#

The more you know the more it connect together

chrome crypt
#

The more you understand and struggle on a question is where the true learning occurs.

grizzled shore
chrome crypt
#

i needa learn abt complex numbers n stuff.

#

Right now I am completing calculus 12 and am hoping to do Calc BC, although I think calc 12 comprises of calc ab and calc bc content.

#

kinda confused tho cus i keep hearing different stuff.

grizzled shore
#

Due to $e^{ix}=\cos(x) + i \sin(x)$

warm shaleBOT
#

Frosst

chrome crypt
#

i stands for imaginary number right?

#

never learnt complex numbers before but briefly remember from a video

#

sqrt-1 = i

grizzled shore
# grizzled shore

You might be able to see how you could get the cos and sin combinations in here

chrome crypt
#

or something like that.

grizzled shore
#

Yeah

chrome crypt
#

gotta learn this.

#

thanks mate for your time and assistance, just one last query. Yk for the local min and max points?

grizzled shore
#

Yeah what about them

chrome crypt
#

So basically when taking the second derivative I know its useful for pinpointing whether a function is concave up or down, but for maximum and minimum points I remember u said that its especially useful for determining max and min points.

#

All I have seen so far is that max points are just the critical points where the slope is 0 or DNE, but is there any application

#

of these local max and min points that I will later find in application of derivatives?

grizzled shore
#

Max points are not necessarily DNE

#

For continuous functions they are necessarily 0

#

Or on the boundary then it can have any slope

#

Well not really

#

On left side boundaries it’s non positive

#

On right side boundaries it’s non negative

#

The point of concavity is that when you find a place where your function has 0 slope

#

You know it’s a critical point

#

But you don’t know if it’s a local minimum or maximum

#

Concavity tells you this

grizzled shore
grizzled shore
chrome crypt
#

Mhmmm.

#

that makes sense.

#

but is there any application

#

in word problems

#

for these points?

grizzled shore
#

Have you done the classic question about maximising ratio of volume of a cylinder to its surface area?

chrome crypt
#

not yet just a beginner yk what don't reveal spoilers for me ima figure it out.

viscid gull
#

don't spoil the manga for the anime only

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@chrome crypt Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

quartz lantern
#

I need to solve for x so that it makes the quadratic formula. I’m stuck on step 4. I need to complete the square but I think I’m doing it wrong

native inlet
#

nope that's right :) what would be that missing chunk?

quartz lantern
#

like that?

native inlet
#

make sure you add it to both sides of the equation

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@quartz lantern Has your question been resolved?

quartz lantern
#

I know I need to square root both sides, but then what happens to the a/bx?

#

wait nvm

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@quartz lantern Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @quartz lantern

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

jade summit
#

im stuck, could someone help me finish this? (gaussian elimination)

nocturne minnow
#

You need to eliminate this 1 now

jade summit
#

yeah, but i just can't find a way to eliminate it

nocturne minnow
#

Use the third row

jade summit
#

if i subtract the third row, I'll get -1 on the other side, do I just revert it? idk if that would make sense though

nocturne minnow
#

Wdym other side?

jade summit
jade summit
#

okay

#

but if i add r3 again I'll just get the 1 back

brave bramble
#

Why isn't it fine to have a -1 there?

jade summit
#

what is it called again

#

i forgot the name

#

the first number after the zeros

brave bramble
#

You can multiply that line by -1 to fix it

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@jade summit Has your question been resolved?

jade summit
brave bramble
#

You're allowed to multiply a row by a constant

jade summit
brave bramble
#

Yes!

jade summit
#

so I can just divide by -1?

#

R4

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@jade summit Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @jade summit

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

unreal whale
obtuse pebbleBOT
unreal whale
#

how do i do part b

tacit scarab
#

Notice that g(x) and h(x) are constants

unreal whale
#

yea

tacit scarab
#

so substitute the values in the inequality

unreal whale
#

how about f(x)

tacit scarab
#

You should have $-8<f(x)\leq7$ now

warm shaleBOT
#

WhereWolf(ping if needed)

unreal whale
#

ye

tacit scarab
#

What's the x values that satisfy this?

#

You should be able to see it from the graph

unreal whale
#

7

tacit scarab
#

No

unreal whale
#

anything from -8 to 7

tacit scarab
#

Umm no

#

That's the range of y values

#

We want the x values

unreal whale
#

0?

tacit scarab
#

We want a range

unreal whale
#

mhm

tacit scarab
#

Ok let's forget the numbers

#

Do it graphically

#

g(x)<f(x)<=h(x) means that f(x) is between g(x) and h(x)

#

And when is that true

unreal whale
#

left side

#

or middle

#

??

#

@tacit scarab

tacit scarab
#

Yes the middle part

#

We want the range of x values of the middle part

unreal whale
#

so what would it be

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@unreal whale Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

timid silo
#

need some help simplifying this

obtuse pebbleBOT
timid silo
#

unsure of how to handle the square on the last term

errant lark
#

Well, that should be taken care of, with the coefficient that you have in that ln term.

timid silo
#

so it would be -2ln for the last term?

errant lark
#

Why -2?

timid silo
#

cause i thought i was supposed to do something with the 1/2

errant lark
errant lark
#

That'll get rid of 2.

timid silo
#

overall cancelling leaving a - right

errant lark
#

Yes

timid silo
#

then just ln laws?

errant lark
#

Yes.

#

Show your work once you are done. Just in case.

timid silo
#

yeah im writing it out right now

#

i was just left on my last submision ill get back in a sec

#

Along the lines of this?

#

Can I cancel across the fraction like that?

errant lark
#

Show the full work. I dunno what you have done with 1/2 ln(x) term but it seems wrong.

timid silo
#

ill rewrite it so its more clear

#

?

#

do i have to distribute the 1/2 throughout the bracket?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@timid silo Has your question been resolved?

errant lark
#

Your major error is here:

$$\frac 1 2\left[\ln{(x)} - 2\ln{(x^2 + 3x +2)}\right] \neq \frac 1 2\left[2 \ln{\left(\frac{x}{x^2 + 3x + 2}\right)}\right]$$

warm shaleBOT
#

Enemagneto

errant lark
#

Basically, identity $\ln{(a)} - \ln{(b)} = \ln{\left(\frac a b\right)}$ only works when there are no coefficients(more precisely coefficient is 1) with $\ln{(a)}$ and $\ln{(b)}$.

warm shaleBOT
#

Enemagneto

timid silo
#

ohhhhhhh

errant lark
#

Or they must have same coefficients.

timid silo
#

ahhhhhh

#

ok

#

i see the fault

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@timid silo Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @next warren

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

visual ridge
#

e,f, and g. How do I find the domains if I don't even know what the functions are?

visual ridge
#

For e i got [-4,3] though i'm not sure if thats right

#

still not sure what to do for f

#

g is also ?

#

<@&286206848099549185>

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@visual ridge Has your question been resolved?

visual ridge
#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @visual ridge

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

bold brook
#

which one should I calculate first?

obtuse pebbleBOT
static marten
#

what do you mean by this

bold brook
#

inequality

static marten
#

there's one inequality there

bold brook
#

is This problem cannot be resolved?

static marten
#

no it can

bold brook
#

🥲

static marten
#

i just don't know 'which one' you're talking about

bold brook
#

8x-3 or x + 1

stable barn
#

,𝐴𝐷𝐶 = 𝐴𝐵𝐶. basically how do I prove b and d

rich plume
#

This channel is already occupied

rich plume
# bold brook which one should I calculate first?

That is a single inequality and there is nothing as such 'which one should I calculate first'. After simplifying both sides simutaneously, you get an interval for x
To start with, multiply BOTH sides by 5

bold brook
#

thank you my friend

#

is 8x-3 > x + 5 ?

fossil crag
warm shaleBOT
#

rafilou2003

fossil crag
#

then, if you look at what the right hand side gives...

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).

#

@bold brook Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@bold brook Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@bold brook Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @bold brook

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

grave harbor
#

From this page is Russian: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binomial_theorem Why is the last step in the proof by induction possible?

In elementary algebra, the binomial theorem (or binomial expansion) describes the algebraic expansion of powers of a binomial. According to the theorem, it is possible to expand the polynomial (x + y)n into a sum involving terms of the form axbyc, where the exponents b and c are nonnegative integers with b + c = n, and the coefficient a of each ...

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@grave harbor Has your question been resolved?

grave harbor
#

<@&286206848099549185> Could you briefly explain why the summation can be expanded like in the part of my notes marked with ?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@grave harbor Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@grave harbor Has your question been resolved?

grave harbor
#

nvm so the first two in the sum are re-written a^(n+1-k) and b^k and also there's apparently the rule as above, and that's it

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @grave harbor

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

cloud sparrow
#

A car travels from C to E in 6 seconds, how long will it take to travel from E to B (refer to the diagram) note that $EC \neq 6$

warm shaleBOT
#

SirGareth

vestal marsh
#

What'd do is make |AB| = 1

#

And then see what ratio of |BE| is of |EC|

#

And then you should be able to figure something out

cloud sparrow
#

what do you mean by those "| |"

vestal marsh
#

Just means distance

cloud sparrow
#

ah

#

is the answer $\frac{2}{\sqrt3}$?

warm shaleBOT
#

SirGareth

vestal marsh
#

On my phone rn so can't verify

#

But it should be whatever the ratio is ×6

cloud sparrow
cloud sparrow
obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@cloud sparrow Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

quartz wave
obtuse pebbleBOT
quartz wave
#

okay, firsly, very dumb question

royal basin
#

better a dumb question than one not asked at all

quartz wave
#

ok sooo

#

firsly

#

why can't we use the bernoulii

#

like for example for the P(X = 0), why can't we write it as 3C0 * 0.4^0 * 0.6^3

#

@royal basin any ideas>

civic zealot
#

probability isn't independent. Once you choose one tv it's taken out of the population changing the prob the next tv is defective or not

royal basin
#

was showering sorry

rocky oak
#

the sign on the blue oval, is that implies sign guys?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@quartz wave Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

lethal surge
obtuse pebbleBOT
lethal surge
#

why isn’t this the same?

#

I thought x/a/b was the same as x/ab

#

in the same way that 10/2/2 = 10/4

lethal surge
# lethal surge

second equation is supposed to also say x= instead of just x

nocturne minnow
warm shaleBOT
#

dldh06

lethal surge
#

but following that 10/2/2 would be 10*1

#

so what’s the difference between the 2?

nocturne minnow
#

Is that (10/2)/2 or 10/(2/2)?

#

Because one results in 5/2, the other 10/1

lethal surge
#

ahh so there have to be a set of parantheses

nocturne minnow
#

Yes

lethal surge
#

you can’t just equalize them like with multiplication

nocturne minnow
#

No

lethal surge
#

that explains everything, thanks

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @lethal surge

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

amber axle
#

so i got these right

obtuse pebbleBOT
amber axle
#

but i uh

#

dont understand why the sets of {A,B} are the same as the OPs of {A,B}

#

i also uh am not sure about this one

#

this is right

#

but im not sure how to count out the fact that the dupes are 2^n

#

<@&286206848099549185>

#

<@&286206848099549185>

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@amber axle Has your question been resolved?

amber axle
#

<@&286206848099549185>

olive kite
#

sorry I can't help but also don't just spam the @

amber axle
#

i thought its fine to ping every 15 min

#

which is what ive been doing

#

if you check the timestamps :P

olive kite
#

pretty sure it means if no one responds within 15 minutes you can send out an @ only once

#

try asking about it in one the channels like proof-and-logic

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@amber axle Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@amber axle Has your question been resolved?

tall ore
#

hi

#

@tall ore

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@amber axle Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@amber axle Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@amber axle Has your question been resolved?

candid sigil
#

ordered pair of sets?

blazing forge
#

and there are 2^n subsets of U

#

if you didn't know that the cardinality of the powerset is 2^n, its because for each element in U, either its in A or its not in A. so for each element there are 2 choices, giving 2^n total possible subsets

amber axle
amber axle
#

im not sure why every OP of (a,b) where $a \in b \in U$ corresponds to every set {a,b} where $(a,b \in U) \land (a \in b \lor b \in a)$

warm shaleBOT
#

aidanlok

amber axle
#

??? why are you doing this in my help channel

slim cove
#

Please stop

#

!occupied

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).

slim cove
#

In the future, please use #bots to test the bots

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@amber axle Has your question been resolved?

blazing forge
# amber axle dont understand why the sets of {A,B} are the same as the OPs of {A,B}

There is a bijection from the set of all ordered pairs (A,B) with A \subseteq B to the set of all sets {A,B} with A \subseteq B; it's defined by (A,B) |-> {A,B}.

Its definitely surjective. If (A, B) and (A', B') are two different ordered pairs that get mapped to the same set {A,B}, then {A, B} = {A', B'}. Thus, either A = A' and B = B' or A = B' and B = A'. We can't have the first case because then (A,B) = (A',B'), contradicting our assumption. But we also can't have the second case--if it were true, then B = A' \subseteq B' = A. This means that A = B = A' = B', so (A,B) = (A,A) = (A', B'), a contradiction as well. Thus, the map is injective, too.

#

Since there's a bijection, the cardinality of all such ordered pairs equals the cardinality of all such sets

patent umbra
# amber axle so i got these right

Every ordered pair obviously gives you an unordered pair.

Conversely, every unordered pair has an unique ordering unless $A = B$. In which case $(A, B) = (B, A)$.

Equivalently, even though ${A, B}$ is unordered you can always order it by saying WLOG B is the larger set.

warm shaleBOT
#

chencking

steep rock
#

Hello

amber axle
#

okay I kind of get this

#

kind of

#

I got my friend to explain surjectives and stuff

#

I kind of get it

#

I’ll do some rereading and re read

blazing forge
#

the bijection just means for every ordered pair (A,B) there is exactly one unique set {A,B} and vice versa. so theres the same number of the pairs (A,B) as the sets {A,B}

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@amber axle Has your question been resolved?

limber pine
#

.reopen

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@amber axle Has your question been resolved?

dusty canopy
#

wait how do i use you

latent walrus
#

whats even going on down here

gilded ferry
balmy mortar
static patio
#

can someone verify my proof from ToC?

keen garnet
obtuse pebbleBOT
static patio
#

uff, i didnt noticed bad chat

#

thx

modern cedar
#

how can i test this integral for convetgence or divergence using lct or dct?

#

do i use lnx<=x<= ex?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).

modern cedar
#

ah i see thx and sry

trim grail
#

.close

amber axle
marble oar
brazen viper
#

@amber axle is there still an open question? It's unclear to me.

amber axle
amber axle
brazen viper
#

@amber axle the originally posted question?

amber axle
#

the original OP -> S(Subsets) question

brazen viper
#

If we take the answer to Q3.8 as true, then we can consider the cases A <= B and B <= A, with each contributing 3^n by Q3.8.

#

But you notice that we have double counted the cases where A = B.

#

And those are 2^n (rather than 3^n) because we can only choose to include in A and B or neither A nor B.

#

I'm literally just restating the "explanation" section of the question, so I'm not quite sure if this is helpful.

#

@amber axle if this isn't sufficient, can you explain where this line of thinking loses you?

amber axle
#

I feel really dumb that’s a really simple tuple count

#

what are we including?

#

and why can it be in neither??

brazen viper
#

@amber axle members of set U (in sets A and B)

#

Sorry, I stepped away for a moment

timid silo
#

closed???

brazen viper
#

No, still open

brazen viper
#

@amber axle you still here?

amber axle
brazen viper
#

No biggie

amber axle
brazen viper
#

Yeah

#

As long as A = B = C

amber axle
#

hmmm ok

#

the guys above mentioned stuff about bijections

#

which we're just getting into

#

but maybe i just leave it as is with ur counting which is good

brazen viper
#

The bijection stuff isn't wrong or anything, I just thought the counting argument would be more understandable

amber axle
#

it is, for what ive learned so far

brazen viper
#

👍

#

Great, let me know if you have other questions

amber axle
#

yeah i do actually have some more counting questions lol

#

let me find it

brazen viper
#

Ping me when you find it please 🙂

amber axle
#

@brazen viper

#

(posting 4.2 for context, i understand that one fully)

#

when writing my explanation for 4.3

#

i was unable to explain precisely why we use the product rule to create the divisior we see in the formula

brazen viper
#

Sure, let's take the bookkeeper example

#

Because each e is indistinguishable, we need to divide by the number of ways we could distinguish it, which is 3!

#

And we also need to divide by the 2! ways to arrange the k, and the o

#

Because we are dividing by multiple things, this is the same as multiplying them, and dividing just once.

#

(a/b)/c = a/(bc)

#

@amber axle

amber axle
#

okay that makes sense

#

just to quote my rubric...

#

independence???

brazen viper
#

Ah,

#

Meaning the arrangement of the es is independent of the os and ks

amber axle
#

oh whaaaaat

#

okay

brazen viper
#

The internal arrangement that is

amber axle
#

so because the arrangement of each of the letters is independent we have to multiply their possibilities, but whats the other option? its not like we'd add...(?)

brazen viper
#

Like, if I labeled the es as e1 e2 e3, and the ks as k1 and k2 whatever order I put the es in, (e2 e1 e3 for example) I can still freely choose the order of the ks

#

If there was some rule where (for instance) maybe the k1 couldn't go before the e1 then in some configurations we couldn't use all possibilities

amber axle
#

OH

#

i see

#

okay

brazen viper
#

@amber axle were there any other lingering doubts?

brazen viper
#

Well, I think we've addressed everything, so I'm going to try to close this. Just open another help channel if you still have other questions. 🙂

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @brazen viper

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

timid silo
obtuse pebbleBOT
timid silo
#

how exactly would I solve this

#

the y(0)=1 and y'(0)=0 is confusing me

#

what would I do

#

I know the homogenous equation is y''-4y'-12y = 0

timid silo
alpine raven
timid silo
#

yes sorry

alpine raven
#

characteristic equation

#

r² - 4r -12 = 0

#

,w x² -4x -12=0

timid silo
#

right

alpine raven
#

then the homogeneous solutions are :
y(x) = A exp(-2x) + B exp(6x)
with A and B some constants

timid silo
#

right

timid silo
alpine raven
#

they are just initial conditions bro...

timid silo
#

Ok

#

im supposed to solve it with the initial conditions but dont know how to

#

its says solve this IVP

alpine raven
timid silo
#

initial value problem

timid silo
timid silo
#

so those would be the constants

#

?

#

still confused sorry

brazen viper
#

@timid silo before you do that you need to find the particular solution

alpine raven
brazen viper
#

But once you do, you can use the two initial conditions to find A and B explicitly

alpine raven
#

but we need the particular solution first

timid silo
#

Ok ill try to work on this now

#

and will be back with questions

alpine raven
#

take y = Cx exp(6x) and find C 🤔

timid silo
#

this would be the general solution

alpine raven
#

no, its the homogeneous solution

timid silo
#

homo

#

sorry got it confused again

timid silo
#

Ok now im working on particular

alpine raven
timid silo
#

working on it

#

im stuck here @alpine raven

alpine raven
#

what is t tho

timid silo
#

t is x

alpine raven
#

then stick to one

#

dont work with both

timid silo
#

ok

alpine raven
#

also, what are you trying to achieve ?

#

🤔

timid silo
#

im trying to solve the particular solution

alpine raven
#

yea but why taking Ax exp(x)

#

🤔

timid silo
#

this is what im trying to do

alpine raven
#

yea but it doesnt mean you should always take A x exp(x)

#

nice try

#

you have exp(6x) in your equation

timid silo
#

right

alpine raven
#

6 is a root of the characteristic equation of our diff equation

alpine raven
timid silo
#

C= y/exp(6x)

#

right?

alpine raven
#

?

timid silo
#

I solved for C

alpine raven
#

if it was that simple :/

timid silo
#

im confused sorry

alpine raven
#

y'' - 4y' -12y
plug y in this

timid silo
#

so it would be the double derivative of exp(6x) -4(derivative of exp(6x) -12(exp(6x))?

#

double derivative of exp(6x) -4(derivative of exp(6x) -12(exp(6x))

alpine raven
#

woaw can you write in maths ?

timid silo
#

...

#

im trying to figure rhat out

#

would it be right?

alpine raven
#

write it in a better way, its hard to read how you wrote it

#

or take a paper and take a picture of what you did

timid silo
#

Ok

alpine raven
#

eh i dont download files

timid silo
#

resending

#

I understand

#

me either

alpine raven
#

where is the Cx in front of exp(6x) ?

#

y = Cx exp(6x)

#

$y = Cxe^{6x}$

warm shaleBOT
#

Herels

timid silo
#

better?

#

@alpine raven

alpine raven
#

cant it just stay C :x

timid silo
alpine raven
#

?

timid silo
#

I plugged in C everywhere

alpine raven
#

yea but what are those C1, C2 and C3

#

👁️

timid silo
#

Thats just C

#

ik its extra

alpine raven
#

remove the 1, 2 and 3

timid silo
#

Ok whats next

alpine raven
#

calculate it my dude

timid silo
#

and then that would be the answer to the particular

#

right?

alpine raven
#

keep your calm, the goal here is to find C

#

:x

alpine raven
timid silo
#

Ok

#

ill brb for a while but Ill work on it

alpine raven
#

i'll be asleep tho

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@timid silo Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

steel goblet
obtuse pebbleBOT
steel goblet
#

i have that velocity is <-6t + a, -4t + b, -4t + c >

#

and i know that r(0) is (7,8,5) but not really sure where to go from here

#

and i know that a^2 + b^2 + c^2 = 16, but that doesn't really help much

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@steel goblet Has your question been resolved?

steel goblet
#

<@&286206848099549185>

quaint wing
# steel goblet

doesnt the fact that the original position + acceleration = final position imply that like

#

a= -6w

#

b= -4w

#

c=-4w

#

where w is some number

#

basically the initial velocity vector must be proportional to the acceleration vector

steel goblet
#

i have no idea. But i did discover this, idk if its helpful.
So the velocity vector is <-6t +a, -4t + b, -4t + c>
since we know the intial condition for the position, we know that the position vector is
<-3t^2 + at +7, -2t^2 +bt + 8, -2t^2 +ct +5>, right?

quaint wing
#

yeah

quaint wing
#

I got from line 3 to 4 by taking derivative with respect to time

steel goblet
#

wait im really confused. I have no idea how you got those equations, and i still don't know how to find a, b, and c

quaint wing
#

from the big 5 equations

#

we start at (7,8,5), then go to (1,4,1)

#

so the displacement is (-6,-4,-4)

steel goblet
#

right

quaint wing
#

and its given to us that the acceleration vector is (-6,-4,-4)

steel goblet
#

right

steel goblet
quaint wing
steel goblet
#

yes

quaint wing
#

its one equation you can use when a is constant

#

lemme remember how to derive it

steel goblet
#

okay i understand that

#

wait no i dont never mind

#

but am i supposed to be using that formula?

#

i never learned that in class. And i looked that up and saw that its a formula used in physics but the class im taking is multivariable calc

quaint wing
#

there might be some other way to solve it

#

i was kinda approaching it the physics way

steel goblet
#

do you know if there's another way to solve it?

#

oh

quaint wing
#

idk

steel goblet
# quaint wing

so im trying to understand this. Is the initial velocity -6, -4, -4?

quaint wing
#

but its proportional to -6,-4,-4

steel goblet
#

oh now i see it's multiplited by t

#

but how does that help?

quaint wing
#

so you use the fact that at t = 0

#

|V| = 4

#

so switch -t to w just for simplicity

#

(-6w)^2+(-4w)^2+(-4w)^2=16

steel goblet
#

okay. so | <-6w, -4w, -4w> | is 4, right?

quaint wing
steel goblet
#

wait, how do you know all those w's are the same?

#

wait do you calculus at all? like integrations?

quaint wing
quaint wing
#

from there to there i took derivative with respect to time

steel goblet
#

but integrating the acceleration vector gives us <-6t +c1, -4t+c2, -4t+c3 > where c1, c2, c3 are all constants that may not be equal

steel goblet
#

right

#

but c1, c2, c3 may or may not be equal

quaint wing
#

so <c1,c2,c3> is proportional to <-6,-4,-4>

#

from this line

#

and c1^2+c2^2+c3^2=16

steel goblet
quaint wing
#

but this is really three different equations we can split up

#

cuz yk if two 3d vectors are equal

#

all their components have to be equal

steel goblet
#

random question, but do you know at what time the particle is at point (1,4,1)?

quaint wing
#

because we get that 68w^2=16

#

so w = +/- 4/sqrt(68)

#

and we know -t=w

#

and t has to be positive so t is 4/sqrt(68)

quaint wing
#

But because the third derivative is zero we can just write it like that

#

So it’s really just saying f(x)=f’(0)x+f’’(0) x^2/2!

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@steel goblet Has your question been resolved?

timid silo
obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

timid silo
#

is there an easy way to solve non homogenous ODEs?

timid silo
#

like a chart to follow?

#

or a specific method

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@timid silo Has your question been resolved?

timid silo
#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @dawn lotus

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

dawn osprey
obtuse pebbleBOT
dawn osprey
#

how can I find x

proven veldt
#

how do i find domain and range and what points do i draw the upside down U

crude coral
dawn osprey
#

how though

crude coral
#

We have
Base = x
Hypothenuse = x+6
Angle = 67

proven veldt
#

ngl i went to the wrong channel my bad

crude coral
dawn osprey
#

just regular Cos?

crude coral
#

Yeah

dawn osprey
#

so

#

x/x+6

#

wait

#

OH

crude coral
dawn osprey
#

wait

#

nvm i got it thanku

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @dawn osprey

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

mighty pilot
obtuse pebbleBOT
mighty pilot
#

asking for me to convert to standard form, when it already is?

#

idk if im missing something

#

<@&286206848099549185>

quaint wing
#

idk

mighty pilot
#

i did, came up wrong

#

im on my last attempt, used up 4/5 lol

quaint wing
#

hm

mighty pilot
#

some are saying its a()^2+c

#

idk

quaint wing
mighty pilot
#

yea

quaint wing
#

might as well try it

mighty pilot
#

yea ig

#

came up wrong, oh well

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @mighty pilot

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

late roost
#

hi, im trying to find the readius and intervial for this problem, any idea where I may have messed up the limit?

late roost
obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@late roost Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

long hedge
#

im stuck on 312

obtuse pebbleBOT
long hedge
#

so if i use the chain rule

#

$sec^2(xy)(y+\frac{dy}{dx})=1\frac{dy}{dx}$

#

is this right

warm shaleBOT
#

putridplanet

tardy epoch
#

Right now use algebra to solve for dy/dx

tardy epoch
long hedge
long hedge
#

divide sec^2(xy) ?

tardy epoch
#

It's just algebra

#

Set z = dy/dx and solve for z

long hedge
warm shaleBOT
#

putridplanet

tardy epoch
long hedge
tardy epoch
#

Wot

long hedge
#

i distributed it into (y+x dy/dx)

tardy epoch
#

a^2(b+c) = a^2 * b + a^2 * c

warm shaleBOT
#

putridplanet