#help-10
1 messages · Page 242 of 1
yeah, sure it does.
No I just meant I haven’t seen limit of a set even in probability
ok so with how inf is defined, that means the limit could be an element of the sequence or maybe not right
or am I misunderstanding
See how it says ℕ
I proved with induction that a_n > 2 for all n in N
yes
Infinity is not in ℕ
the limit of a sequence need not appear as a term in it even once
it CAN but it doesn't need to
Closed by @merry vault
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
which means the sequence has a min and min = inf ?
Yes
so I assume all sequences with n in N have either inf=min or sup=max
For similar reasons to max and sup
???
What

...
nvm
you're overthinking it so hard tbh
Why does n in N imply there exists a min/max
n in N means n is always finite
what even are you asking at this point
this entire exchange has confused me severely
can you repeat the question you want to ask, please
There are an infinite number of terms, but you never get to the limit
There’s no term that is the limit in the sequence
Well there could be but on accident
But that goes back to this point
Sorry I don't understand because there's lim n->infty (a_n)
This evaluates to a number
Let a_n be some sequence with n in N. If a_n has a lower bound, it's inf a_n = min a_n. If a_n has a upper bound, it's sup a_n = max a_n.
Is that right?
But $a_{\infty}$ doesn’t exist
Frosst
Ah I see what you mean now
I think
because you count up forever
infinity is not a number
anyway
don't worry I was just thinking about stuff randomly
it's not important
.close
Closed by @merry vault
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So uh I've been going through my textbook and I'm confused on why it does something at one point.
It's gonna take a while to type this so bear with me...
This is the question
It explains it in 3 steps
I understand the first step, which is...
Now I'm a bit stuck on the second bit...
I understand the formula r*e^iθ = (cosθ + isinθ)
but why does it multiply by
Silly Little Twat
instead of $e^{-i\frac{\pi}{n}}$
Silly Little Twat
Which is the actual congugate
For reference, here is the 3rd step
I see pi/2n is used in the final answer, but I can't see how it came up with pi/2n
Maybe I'm tired and missing something really simple and obvious 🤷♂️
I've been trynna figure it out but I couldn't so I'm going to take a tiny rest from it, ping me when you get it please
@vale forum Has your question been resolved?
no idea sorry
ok
Just because your end goal involves π/2n
So in step 2 they're making sure all the angles are π/2n
Closed by @vale forum
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
it is d because if you have number
less than -2
the square of those numbers
is also greater than 4 so function will exist
why can't it be e
wdym?
because x can be a negative number
it works with - 1, -2, -3 and so on
How
oh I se
numerator is a semicircle, x can be any number but anything between (-2, 2)
wait i just don't get whats the point of the absolute value
turns any negatives into positives
|-2| = 2
|2| = 2
nws, close this ticket before using the other one
.close
Closed by @mint moat
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I don't know if I am being a bot rn or not but I don't get why this is wrong
I tried applying unit step to kill it after t=3 but that didn't work either
shouldn't this just be 5* L(1) = 5*1/s =5/s
,w integral 0 to 3 5e^(-st) dt
hey atleast I had the 5/s part
I guess since it doesn't go off to infinity the upper bound matters
normally it would get killed
because it is a transient
I see
ty Tushar
.close
Closed by @fathom flicker
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
Closed by @fathom flicker
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.texas
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey I have this exercice:
Show that the matrix
$M =\frac{\sqrt{13}}{13}\begin{matrix} 2 & 3 \
3 & - 2
\end{matrix}$ is orthogonal. Is it the matrix of a rotation or a bilateral symmetry? If it is a rotation, calculate its angle. If it is a symmetry, calculate its axis.
I've already done the first part by showing that multiplying the transpose of the matrice times itself gives the identity matrix, now for the second part, how should I proceed? What I though of is to calculate the eigen values then the eigein vectors to diagonalise the matrix and determine the transform from its diagonalised version
froud
often it is enough to compute trace and det
do both
they tell you the sum and product of the eigenvalues
from that you can already argue some stuff
without actually having to diagonalise
so after calculating the trace and the determinant what do I do with the resulting scalar values?
what are the possible types of orthogonal transformations and which eigenvalues do they have
I'm sorry I don't quite get the reasoning...
what operations are to be applied
can you give an example
I don't know, I can't quite make the link between eigen values and matrices in general
do you know what eigenvalues are
yes the roots of the caracteristic polynomial or $det(M-\lambda I ) = 0$
froud
technically correct but not the definition you should think of
also each eigen value is associated to an eigen vector v such that $f(v) = \lambda v$
ok
froud
so an eigenvalue belongs to a vector which is only scaled
do you know that eigenvalues of orthogonal matrices have absolute value 1?
no I didn't, orthogonal matrices are matrices which have orthogonal column vectors right?
orthonormal column vectors
so orthogonal unit column vectors (magnitude 1)?
yes
ok i see, what does the property with the absolute value 1 state?
no
oh -1 and 1?
what do you mean, something similar to $a^2 + b^2 = 1$ or am I lost?
complex numbers
froud
no
or 1 + \lambda i ?
okayyy that's what I thought
polar coordinates right?
yes
Ok I see, however we don't have this property to learn for the exam, this hint was given for the exercice: The eigenvalues are −1 and 1. An eigenvector of eigenvalue 1 is located on the symmetric axis, while an eigenvector of eigenvalue −1 is orthogonal to it. To know the axis of this orthogonal symmetry, it
It is therefore sufficient to know an eigenvector of eigenvalue 1, would it be possible to explain what they're talking about here
It isn't the only way to proceed, since I didnt understand the hint, I wanted to see if they were any other ways, thus asking about your way
let's think about what the axis of symmetry means
those are the points which do not change under the transformation
or in other words, only get scaled with the value 1
aka eigenvalue 1
I see
meanwhile those vectors orthogonal to the axis get mirrored. aka flipped. aka multiplied with -1. aka eigenvalue -1
I don't understand
why are we considering the orthogonal vectors and why only the value -1?
well that's what reflecting over the axis does
what happens with the vectors that aren't orthogonal? and I don't get why -1 multiplies vectors here
the vectors which are not orthogonal also get reflected but thats not just scaling with some number in that case. aka not an eigenvector
if v looks into some direction, then -v looks into the opposite direction
ok, lets say we have eigen values -1 and 1 and eigen vectors (-1, 0, 2) and (1,-3,4) what would be the axis of symetry?
well lets stay 2 dimensional
yeah sorry
the eigenvector with eigenvalue 1 gives the axis
the eigenvector with eigenvalue -1 is orthogonal to the axis
why orthogonal and not colinear?
because that's how mirrors work
eigenvector means that it stays on the same axis
that only happens if it is orthogonal to the symmetry axis
I don't understand
which axis? since the eigen vector with eigen value 1 is the axis
eigenvector of a transformation means that it gets only scaled. which means that it stays on its own axis
ohhhh okay, so the transformed vector is colinear to the original vector?
if its an eigenvector, yes
ok I see
either in the same direction if the eigenvalue is positive. or in the other direction if it is negative
or 0 if the eigenvalue is 0
(and lets ignore complex eigenvalue for now cause that is impossible to imagine anyway)
yeah, but you said that the -1 eigen vector is orthogonal, I still dont get that?
if you have a mirror and something gets reflected so that the mirror image is collinear
that something has to be orthogonal to the mirror
Ok, I understand, but what is the mirror in this case?
the axis of symmetry
what's the connection with the eigen vectors?
like how is it related, that's what I dont get
the eigenvectors of eigenvalue 1 are the axis of symmetry
they dont change
the axis of symmetry is the thing that doesn't change
ok, that's what I have in mind
I really don't see why the left vector (-1v) should be orthogonal to the right vector (1v) and not to the y unit vector...
everything always goes through the origin
how is anything in that image related to reflecting along an axis
indeed, my bad, gimme a sec
I would draw something but I'm on mobile
yeah, no worries I'm going to try from my side
something like this?
where is the orthogonality?
so far you only drew the axis of symmetry
Oh, the north-east vector is 1v and the south-west is -1v, in this case -1v is not orthogonal to 1v, I dont understand
well it's not
ok so that's exactly what I don't comprehend here
I don't really understand how you think that this is the image you produce
what do you mean?
from what I understand, -1v should be the red or green vector in this image
since it is orthogonal to the black 1v vector
no
what does -v have to do with the eigenvector of eigenvalue -1
v and -v both have eigenvalue 1
every vector on that line has eigenvalue 1
no I meant -1 x v the eigen vector of eigen value -1
if you call the green vector w, then the red vector is -w
aka multiplied by -1
aka eigenvector with eigenvalue -1
aka orthogonal to v
which is your black vector to the north east
yes exactly so why aren't both eigen vectors on the black line?
the eigein vector of eigen value 1
there is more than one eigenvector for one eigenvalue. every vector on the line is again an eigenvector
oh right
v, 2v, 17v etc
oh, but isn't the only allowed scalar values 1 and -1?
what
I'm really super confused here I think
so eigen vectors are vectors that are multiplied by a scalar after transformation and eigen values are the scalar values which multiply the eigen vectors, right? Why do we have 2 and 17 as scalar if the eigen values are -1 and 1
ohhhhh, my bad
17v gets transformed to 17v
I didn't see it like that
ok back to the drawing, where are situated the eigen vector lines?
the line through the black vectors is the axis of symmetry. all the vectors on that line are eigenvectors with eigenvalue 1
all the vectors along the line through the red and green vectors are eigenvectors with eigenvalue -1
cause their mirror image is again on the line, just in the opposite direction
ok perfect, that's what I thought
so now back to the exercice hint, what do I have to do from here?
you want to calculate the axis of symmetry (cause apparently you are already given that it is not a rotation)
so you have to compute the eigenvectors belonging to eigenvalue 1
I hope you know how to do that
ok, yeah, I solve $(M-1\cdot I)(x,y,z) = (0, 0, 0)$, right?
froud
yeah I was going to modify it 😂
ok great, so I solve that and then? I determine what type of transformation the vector is?
then you are done
Yep, Indeed I just give the vector and that gives the transformation axis right?
yes
ok great, also a last question why can't the symmetry axis be the eigen vector of eigen value -1?
but the axis of symmetry changes the vectors directions anyways , no?
no
oh sorry, yeah I get it
the mirror image is again the vector itself
Yeah I understand 😄
Great, well thanks a lot for your help, have a great rest of the day !
u2
Closed by @ripe oracle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone help me with this
The question is in blue
,rotate
@opal sonnet Has your question been resolved?
nebula40
@opal sonnet I think you can finish the last step
did you multiply by cos ?and where did the csc come from?
yes, and 1/sin(t) = csc(t)
and how do i get rid of the cos on top
well the top product is just cot^3(t)
nebula40
yeah maybe I should have turned csc to sin instead to be clearer
no problem
@opal sonnet Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @opal sonnet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey all, it's quite embarassing but I need help with catching up to math to prepare for statistics..I'll put it into questions to explain what I need help with
(for example 3/2 is a fraction, 3 over 2)
-
Find the slope and write the equation of the line containing the points (6, -2) and (0, 5)
-
Solve and graph each inequality. Graph each.
a. | 4x-6 | < 4
b. | x + 3/2 | > 3/2
c. -2x + 3y > x + 9
d. -y > 3x - 1
do you need help with both 1 and 2?
yes please
m is the slope which is before the x right?
yeah
I dont think I know how to find it on #1 when it comes to the 2 points though or maybe I'm overthinking it. but for #2 I'm guessing each number before X is the slope?
not always
the number before y must be 1
and on the other side to the x
but to find the gradient between 2 points its the change in y/change in x
Alright so how would I apply this to the first problem, wouldn't I have to do it in reverse or something?
well you have 2 points, (6,-2) and (0,5)
the 6 and 0 are the x coords and the -2 and 5 are the y coords
now how much has y changed between those 2 points
yeah
rise over run i believe?
yeah exactly
no but I believe I just saw that on a previous question
So that makes it y - (-2) = -7/6(x-6)?
Oh wait so is that good or? is my y1 wrong?
oh okay, now how about question #2, i was just soaking in every step
@wary grove Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
actually i'll get back to it late
I tried to solve this problem by using branch of logarithm, but then i realised to use the branch of log we need to make sure 0 doesn't in the domain and in my case 0 is in the domain. Can anyone help me with this?
@wary grove Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i need help
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
@lapis ether Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @lapis ether
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
@lapis ether Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have this problem
I can't figure out if f|u ^-1 (O) is open in X or the subset topology of U.
Or if that makes a difference
Maybe one could argue that if f wasn't continous then there exists a sequence a_n with lim a_n = a, but lim f(a_n) is not f(a) and make a contradiction with that
But that doesn't look like something that is worth 4 points 
4/20 points
How much do you need to write for 4 points from your experience?
3/4 of a page?
ah wait we have a convention that neighborhoods are all open neighborhoods
so I think that means the distinction doesn't matter
Yes, we had this convention, too
since f|u^-1(O) intersection U (U a neighborhood) is open in X
What is O?
oh I meant to say O is some open set in Y
I want to do f^-1(O) is open for all open O in Y
Okay 
now f|u^-1(O) open by continuity of restriction to specially given U.
if it's open in U it means it is some open set in X intersected with U, but U open therefore- the result of that intersection is an open set in X.
it's also a subset of f^-1(O)
and I think it's fine then
we can just union them all
Like you are saying that for all x in f^(-1)(O) we can find an open subset U where x is continous in. And then f^(-1)(O) is the union of all those?
But doesn't that only show that f^(-1)(O) is a subset of this union?
What's u here?
subscript of U
And U?
How do you know that U is actually a subset of f^(-1)(O)?
Do you mean the intersection of f^(-1)(O) and U? Because the way you write it one could interprete it as a ristricted domain, but then U was part of O
so I argue f|U^-1(O) open in X
then that f|U^-1(O) subset f^-1(O) obviously
then union them for all x in O.
and we are done.
Wait: So you are saying x is in O, so x is actually in Y not in X?
@swift coral Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
pt. 1
pt. 2
does pt 2 look right so far? im checking my work from a matrix calculator but its saying my answer for x_4 is wrong.
@azure anchor Has your question been resolved?
-4r_2 + r_3?
-4R2 = [0 -4 16 -4 | 280]
-4R2 + R3 = [0 -4 16 -4 | 280] + [0 4 0 -4 | 20] = [0 0 16 -8 | 300]
Closed by @azure anchor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm assuming that fixed everything?
Hey can someone explain what all those like rational, irrational, real, natural, and whole number mean? I can't figure out how to apply them to my homework
definition of whole number isnt very standard and may be different in whatever you're learning from
"whole number" is almost never used
Closed by @honest yacht
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
I thought I understood but I guess not? Bc like I thought the number would just be like an integer but
It said that was wrong?
you selected rational, and only rational
@honest yacht Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
What other ones does it work with
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hey
@mellow mason Ask your question here
ok i need help with a biology assigment
There is a biology server in #old-network
"if you have trouble finding the information in the reading, feel free to use google to find any remaining notes"
Have you tried this?
For example if you have trouble filling in the first column I would google,
"What is the function of nucleic acids as macromolecules?"
"What is the function of proteins as macromolecules?"
etc...
@mellow mason Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
please can someone help get the answer or give me the answer
@woeful gyro Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185> help please
So what are these values on the top of the table
what do you mean
the sr?
its 2/3x-40 and 1/4x+12
So the x has 2 values ?
I mean it seems that without knowing what is that row
The question can not be solved
no its jus yu have to solve for one
the row is the answers when yu solve for x
What I want to say is that.
The question needs some number in it to be solvable
So the only number given here is that row of numbers.
So it is important to know what that row of numbers represent
I don't think that it presents the equations of x
so how would should i do to get x
do i solve 2/3x-40
Oh I am sorry I understand that now
So let's start
First of all we need a little drawing that will explain the question a lot
I am with you
Closed by @woeful gyro
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im stuck on this problem
@topaz bone Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@topaz bone Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @topaz bone
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
assuming you have the given differential equation (1), dividing both sides by dy gives (2) and integrating both sides to solve gives (3). My question is, what exactly does integrating with dx in denominator mean?
my intuitive answer is it makes no sense to try to integrate with a dx in the denominator, and i suppose this example is not great because it can just be re-arranged to get rid of dx and dy from denominator, but the core of my question still remains
@serene jetty Has your question been resolved?
dx/x=dy/6y
6In|x|+C=In|y|
There is no such thing as 1/dx
dx,dy… things like that, are not numbers, you can treat them as symbols for now, the precise definition appears in differential geometry, they are actually cotangent vectors. For now you can view them as symbols
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
does taking the log of 30(0.5)^x/47 simplify to 30x/47 log(0.5)
((yeah, we are building up f^-1(O) as an open set))
????
like if i wanted to take the log of 0.5 specifically
That?
I thought it meant either $30(0.5)^{x/47}$ or $\frac{30(0.5)^x}{47}$ lol
tatpoj
and then log of one of those
Yea the first one I had originally and they said no
@gray kindle it would be helpful if you could take a picture so we can see how it's written
Can you post the full problem? There isn't really any situation when you'd have an expression like that and take a log of just part of it
Stephen
.close
Closed by @gray kindle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hellooo may I ask if this is correct?
I used sine and cosine to solve it, I don't know if its true
x is correct
Closed by @fading charm
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How can I do this question with Newton's divided difference?
This is my solution, is it correct?
@molten lintel Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @molten lintel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i dont understand
@buoyant valve Has your question been resolved?
firstly
Please read #❓how-to-get-help
secondly #old-network
is seems clear.
is it the partial fraction part that you don't understand?
yes thats the part
i see, usually we will set that fraction into
A/s + (Bs+C)/(s²+1)
and find A B C by comparing coeff
im not sure how do the comparison part despite watching some of the yt videos
yes
then, we expand
0s² +1s -1 = As² + A + Bs² + Cs
then we have
0s² +1s -1 = (A+B)s² + Cs + A,
then we have
A+B = 0
C = 1
A = -1
is it okay?
it's because
s-1
we have 1 s
we have -1 1
and 0 s²
since originally we dont have s² term
for easier reading, we add a s² term by multiplying it by 0
so we will have an s² term with coeff (0)
okay? i think i sort of understand
what do u mean by this part tho
that is why i wrote
0s²+1s-1
in this polynomial s-1
we have one s
we have negative one 1
and zero s²
yep
tysm that helped alot
then you'll have a nice partial fraction
Closed by @buoyant valve
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
given f(x)= (x-3)(x-6) / (x-1)(x-6)(x-8)
can i considered f(x) as polynomial in the range of 1<x<6
no not really, but what do you mean by "consider it as polynomial"
in the range of 1<x<6, f(x) is continuous
yes (that doesn't make it a polynomial though lol)
i guess polynomial has a strict definition then
however i have one more question
how to know whether f(x) is continuous or not in the range of 1<x<6
is it provable? through mathematical process
well, polynomials are continuous, and f(x) / g(x) is continuous whenever f and g are continuous and g ≠ 0
ohhhh
that's lit
why f(x) is not polynomial in the range of 1<x<6
i mean it is continuous in that range
what makes it disqualified as a polynomial
well, a polynomial is specifically a function of the form $a_0 + a_1x + a_2x^2 + \cdots + a_nx^n$
hayley!
um one feature that f exhibits on (1,6) that polynomials don't is that it has unbounded derivative [slope] on a bounded set
"unbounded" and "bounded," im not sure what these words mean in math
eh
don't worry about it for now
here let me graph the thing
,w graph (x-3)(x-6) / ((x-1)(x-6)(x-8))
I do, but how do you notice the graph gonna looks like this without putting it into wolfram. Can i spot the characteristics just on the expression
well, most salient is the fact that the expression isn't shaped like a polynomial
because it's got that big ol fraction bar
making it what's called a rational function
from that, i can deduce f(x)/g(x) is not polynomial, when f(x) isn't 0 and deg g(x) >=1
yeah with the exception of if g goes away after cancelling common factors
like $\frac{x(x+4)}{x+4} = x$ is a polynomial (with a hole in it) even though it started with a fraction bar
hayley!
but f(4) is not defined. that, as you said, with a hole in it.
So i think it isn't a polynomial, because polynomial is continuous
true, good point! it would not be a polynomial on the real line
however, if you restricted the domain to something like (-4, 4) then it would act like a polynomial (and really would be one on that domain)
You're confusing rational fractions in the sense of the field of fractions of the ring of polynomials and rational functions in the sense of quotient of polynomial functions. They're not the same object although they can be written similarly
This is true in R(X)
$$\frac{X(X+4)}{(X+4)}=X$$
Categorist
But
$$\frac{x(x+4)}{(x+4)}=\begin{cases}x & \text{ if } x\neq -4,\ \text{undefined} & \text{ if } x=-4.\end{cases}$$
Categorist
You have to take care whether you are working with algebraic fractions vs. rational functions
@brisk arrow Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Test for convergence of power series √n.x^n/(√n^2+1)
Is that $\frac {\sqrt{n}\cdot x^{n}}{\sqrt{n^{2} +1}}$ ?
Enemagneto
@viscid spindle Has your question been resolved?
What have you tried?
well, that's inconclusive.
Can you show your working?
@viscid spindle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$\int^{\pi/2}_0 \ln{(\sin{x})} ,dx$
What is the question?
i need to calculate this
could be
im not sure
but the integral invovles complex numbers
@restive pendant Has your question been resolved?
use kings rule
yes
that'll prove the equality of two integrals then you may look into how to use properties of log
no you can just use different log properties and get to the result
for euler form afaik you convert it right away
I dont see it
you know sin's complex form right
put that in and then use linearity of integral and log properties to get separate integrals
use sin2x = 2sinxcosx and put its value
@restive pendant Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @restive pendant
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help me with this question?
as in you havent learned integration at all?
no I have
or just for logarithms
but we haven't specifically learnt integrating ln(x)
you can write y = ln(x-1) as x = 1 + e^y
hol up
oh yeah I see it
ohhhhhhh
so you change it from x to y
so our range is 0-3?
Did you hear of
Integration by parts ?
nope
It kinda requires integration by parts to solve for the integration of ln(x)
But for now do you know the boundaries of the integration you will make ?
No
what
You will integrate with respect to x
i mean for this
we haven't learned to integrate ln(x) yet
right
$$\int_{a} ^{b}$$
Sherif Player
2 and e^3+1
i know a and b
idk how to integrate ln(x) so I don't see how I am supposed to go from there
What are they ?
this
No it is
0 and e^3 + 1
oh right
You want the area under the y=3 curve - ln(x) curve starting from 0 to the point of intersection to
So the equation now looks like this
$$\int_{0} ^{e^{3} + 1} (3) - \int _{0} ^{e^{3} + 1} (\ln(X - 1))$$
Sherif Player
Oh wait the boundary of the second one isn't 0
Because we want to start from x-axis
So it will be 2 as you said
So the equation now looks like this
$$\int_{0} ^{e^{3} + 1} 3 dx - \int _{2} ^{e^{3} + 1} \ln(X - 1) dx$$
🤔
Sherif Player
So we want to integrate ln(X-1)
So you will need to know about integration by parts to do it
But for now
You should know that
$$\int (\ln(x)) dx = \ln(x) \times x - x + c$$
right
Sherif Player
So the indefinite integral of ln(X - 1) is
$$\int \ln(x - 1) dx = ln(x-1)\times (x-1) - x + c$$
Sherif Player
i think so
So it will be this
$$3x |{0}^{e^{3}+1}dx - ( (x-1)\ln(x-1) - x) |{2}^{e^{3}+1}dx $$
Sherif Player
So that is it
Now we just want evaluate it
You don't know about this
$$x|_{0}^{3}$$
Sherif Player
yeah how does it become 3x
Hmm
Do you know about integration?
$$\int 3 dx = 3x + C$$
Sherif Player
yea
So let's get to this?
Evaluating this will give this
$[3\times(e^{3}+1) - 3\times 0] - [(e^{3}+1 -1) \times \ln(e^{3} +1-1) - (e^{3} +1) - [(2-1) \times \ln(2-1) - 2]]$
Oh half of the picture is cut away lol
Sherif Player
That is better
$$(3e^{3} + 3) - [e^{3} \ln(e^3) - (e^3+1) - [ 1 \times \ln(1) - 2]]$$
Sherif Player
right
$$ 3e^3 + 3 - [ 3e^{3} - e^{3} - 1 + 2]$$
Sherif Player
$$3e^{3} + 3 - [2e^{3} + 1]$$
Sherif Player
ah
$$e^{3} + 2$$
Sherif Player
so e^3 + 2
Yes
Closed by @hard citrus
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
No problem
.reopen
✅
.close
Closed by @hard citrus
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
sorry forgot basic math
ax^2 + bx + c
for b^2 - 4ac >/</=0
how do u know whether it is > or < or =?
yes i know its based on number of solution but how u even know how many solution there is?
by knowing this
u^2 -8u + 12 (example)
= (u-6)(u-2)
does this mean 2 solution so discriminant > 0?
yes
Yes
ok what if the question give this u^2 = 8u + 2k
but normally you use the discriminant to find the no. of solutions
how do u know how many solution
depends on k
wait but isnt the number of solution for u to solve the discriminant
Equal to 0? = One sol
no, it just tells you the sign
the question is phrased, explain why u^2-8u+2k has no solution if k>8
in general the discriminant is easier to calculate
that is what i want to know
ok find the discriminant
if k>8 then you know
huh wtf but its only k>8 at the final, like for this one there is negative which means the sign must flip
so like how do u know what if its alot more flipping/complicated eqn?
its very hard to reverse do it
but u are doing it reverse r
rn
what if the equation is too complicated to reverse do it
then how do u figure out
or wait
is it cuz it says
K>8 has "no solution" so discriminant < 0?
since disc<0 is no sol
you can go from no sol ==> discrim < 0 ==> k < 8 then reverse the steps
Closed by @high mirage
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I get the right thought process / ideas / solving ways for math Olympiad level questions?
The math Olympiads first round will soon start in my country and I've tried practicing some old math olympiads tasks in the past few days and I am not able to find the right ways to solve them.
I watched many videos about math Olympiad tasks and I can mostly understand how it is solved and it makes sense but when I try some myself I never seem to get the right beginning of the solution and just sit there wondering how I can start solving them.
If you can't solve any problems, even after spending a lot of time on it, maybe you should try some easier problems first
We also have a math server focusing on math olympiads btw
Yes
oh my bad
Closed by @pliant bone
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
You can check the resources from the the training channel below the mathematical olympiad section
in that channel
thank you
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Looking for help for question a b and c, don't understand what the formula means so an explanation would be greatly appreciated! Thank u
Hi! For part a, try substituting the variable d with the values 1 and 2 to obtain the first two terms.
Ah, but here you have n and d as variables. Does the problem give you more information?
$u_n = 12+7n$ This formula would make a bit more sense, since it tells us how to obtain the $n-$th term, given the position $n$.
Drenitor
it does look like a typo in the question
the common difference means the difference between consecutive terms is the same, and it wants you to find this difference
so if we had the sequence 1,3,5,7,9,..., the common difference would be 2
assuming the formula is supposed to be u_n = 12 + 7n, you can try write out a few terms and spot the common difference
or look at the formula, and see what happens every time you increase n by 1
well n is just the placement of the term and then d is another variable
basically what people call "x"
nope thats all it says
so if i substitute d as 1 do i just do n as 1 too
cuz if yes then u_1 would be 19 and u_2 would be 26
common difference is 7?
and then for question c the 25th term is 187?
could anyone help me double check that
please just dm me and help me double check cuz im going to close the ticket first cuz im gonna go sleep
@hollow dove if u dont mind helping me thanks :)
.close
Closed by @little pelican
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone help me with this function
image inbound?
,rccw
Do i take the y point and put at the place of f(x)?
Closed by @lethal pulsar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hallo
Tryna solve this one. I tried putting in a+ib on z's place, but it feels like I just complicated it further
Translate it
Solve the equation P(z) = 0
Equate it to zero I guess?
Is that i?
yes
right
Idk
so we have (2-i)*z = -i
Divide both sides by (2-I)
i did that, but its not the correct result
somehow
nvm ur right
holy shit why did they write the answer in such a stupid way
Ez
Show your work @sharp hare
Because complex numbers in the standard form don't have imaginary unit appearing in the denominator, hence you have to rationalize
,rcw
yeah i think because they want me to times it with the conjugated
Yes, you need to do that if you have some i in the denominator
Simplify it
$$\frac{-i}{2 - i} = \frac{-i}{2 - i} \cdot \frac{2 \textcolor{green}{+} i}{2 \textcolor{green}{+} i} = \frac{-i \cdot \left(2 + i\right)}{\left|2 - i\right|^2} = \frac{1 - 2i}{5} = \frac{1}{5} - \frac{2}{5} i$$
Alberto Z.
Yep, exact
Closed by @sharp hare
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
just checking this is true right
I expressed arg(-1+it) in terms of t
yes this is cts
what's cts
Closed by @hexed apex
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What do you think
20x, of course
explain why you think so
<@&268886789983436800>
multuplication is just repeated addition
Why are you entertaining this?
Closed by @slim cove
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
usually when someone posts such a question, they don't rpely. So. I thought it was genunine this time
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
