#help-10

1 messages · Page 196 of 1

gentle current
#

well

#

log 5 of x =-2

vapid pecan
#

Oh

#

I was looking at a wrong thing

#

Im having a mental breakdown

gentle current
#

it s ok dw

vapid pecan
#

Ight thanks

#

I got 1 more including logarithma

#

,rotate

warm shaleBOT
vapid pecan
#

Is it okay to this point

gentle current
#

what does log simple meen?

vapid pecan
#

Huh

#

I dont know

gentle current
#

um

vapid pecan
#

What are you talking about

gentle current
#

it s weird

#

it s log 2 of (log +x)

vapid pecan
#

Nah

#

I just cant write

#

Its log2(log4(x))

gentle current
#

ooooooh

#

ok

#

it s good

#

sorry but it s hard to read

vapid pecan
#

Y my bad

#

I don't think its good

#

,rotate

warm shaleBOT
gentle current
#

ye it s good

vapid pecan
#

Naah

gentle current
#

log 2 of x is greater than 1/8

vapid pecan
#

So x should be greater than like 1/256

gentle current
#

that means x is greater than 2^1/8

vapid pecan
#

But photomath says 1<x<16

gentle current
#

um

#

wait ye

#

sorry

vapid pecan
#

What's the mistake

gentle current
#

wait i think i see it

#

in the first photo were you changed the base from 4 to 2

#

it s not x^-2

#

it s x^1/2

vapid pecan
#

Thats the same tho

gentle current
#

no i ts not

vapid pecan
#

2-¹ = 1/2

gentle current
#

yes

#

2^-1

#

you wrote -2

vapid pecan
#

Yeah

#

Cuz 1/2 = 2-¹

#

And up there things multiply

gentle current
#

in this case not

vapid pecan
#

Idk how to explain in english but im like 99% sure it's the same

gentle current
#

because it s not (x^2)^-1

gentle current
#

but here it s x^(2^-1)

vapid pecan
gentle current
#

nope

vapid pecan
#

Yes 😭

gentle current
#

x^1/2

#

is square root of x

#

right?

vapid pecan
#

Yeah

gentle current
#

x^-2

#

is 1/(x^2)

#

it s not the same thing

#

search on youtube power rules

vapid pecan
#

Naah im sure i did this like my entire life and it was good

#

Unless i mixed it up with something

gentle current
#

what you are saying it s true

#

but only is

#

when you have

#

(x^y)^z

#

only then they multiply, y and z

#

but in the case x^y^z

#

they don t multiply

#

because z is power of y

#

not x

vapid pecan
#

So replace -2 with 1/2 everywhere

#

I mean its the same thing up until the switching with t

#

So it should be 1/2t * 1/2t

#

Nah

#

1/2t * ✓t

#

Yeah that makes sense

gentle current
#

it s clear now?

vapid pecan
#

Idk i get t³<48

#

Well yeah because im incapable of multyplying 2 numbers

gentle current
#

xd

vapid pecan
#

Kay i get x<16

#

But like photomath also gets x>1

gentle current
#

yes

#

because

#

there is a log in a log

#

and the argument must be positive

vapid pecan
#

Well 0.5 is also positice

gentle current
#

yes

vapid pecan
#

Ooh

#

It cant be 1

#

Bcs then log of 0

gentle current
#

but it gives u a negative number if the number is between 0 and 1

#

and yes

#

it must be greater then 1 so it s not 0 ore negative

vapid pecan
#

Ight thanks

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @vapid pecan

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

gentle current
#

no prob

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

cloud igloo
obtuse pebbleBOT
cloud igloo
#

Are these two correct?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@cloud igloo Has your question been resolved?

cloud igloo
#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @cloud igloo

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

burnt cipher
#

hey guys, is this correct?

obtuse pebbleBOT
sage geode
#

,w limit of 1/(x + sqrt(x^2 - 1)) as x approaches -infinity

sage geode
#

Yes

burnt cipher
#

dang why im sure it is a 0

sage geode
#

You can use software to check answers sometimes

sage geode
burnt cipher
#

i did but im unsure why it doesnt turn to 0

#

because if you lift off the root the x^2 becomes x

#

wait

#

fuck me

#

thanks man

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @burnt cipher

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

#

Please don't occupy multiple help channels.

#
Channel closed

Closed due to the original message being deleted

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

elfin burrow
#

I came across this form of Gauss's triangular number theorem in terms of generating functions:

elfin burrow
#

Does this imply the familiar Gauss's triangular number theorem involving integers (that every positive integer can be written as a sum of three triangular numbers)?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@elfin burrow Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@elfin burrow Has your question been resolved?

tardy epoch
#

but i don't immediately see how

elfin burrow
# tardy epoch try proving it

I think cubing both sides gives a generating function for the number of ways n can be expressed as a sum of three triangular numbers

#

but no further luck

#

maybe the author (Tom M. Apostol) just considers that identity to be Gauss' triangular number theorem

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@elfin burrow Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @elfin burrow

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

timid silo
obtuse pebbleBOT
timid silo
#

in video he says to choose any number and multiple it to get positive or negative but for the left i chose -2 i got negative instead

#

so how am i supposr to choose the right number to get the correct answer

stone spoke
#

-2 is in (-3,4) which is negative as he shows in the vid

golden oriole
#

-2 is to the right of -3

timid silo
#

oh

#

lmao

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @full tiger

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

timid silo
obtuse pebbleBOT
timid silo
#

why is infinite not a bracket

#

its part of the graph

golden oriole
#

Wdym ?

timid silo
#

its part of the graph

native crag
#

they are abusing notation

timid silo
#

like infinite, 4 , -3 and -inf r part of the graph

native crag
#

the graph' doesnt include' infinity

tardy epoch
timid silo
#

ok so any numbers r brackets then

#

?

golden oriole
#

By infinity they mean any arbitrarily large number that you could want to use
Just shows there is no upper limit

#

And -infinity shows there is no lower limit to that interval

timid silo
#

ok so i use brackets whenever theres real numbers

#

is that right

azure anchor
#

open interval vs closed interval

timid silo
#

open is paranthesis?

#

how do u get open in these questions tho

azure anchor
#

an interval including "infinity" cannot "include" infinity itself, because infinity is not a value in of itself.

#

so interval with infinity is always open

timid silo
#

Ok this is my question

#

So do I move the x^3 or the 49x to the other side?

golden oriole
#

Doesn't matter

timid silo
#

idk how to factor that

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@timid silo Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

modern palm
#

What form is this series in?

obtuse pebbleBOT
modern palm
#

geometric?

lusty hearth
#

it's an intgral of a géometric séries almost intégrale if u factorise by x/10

#

and it will converge for |R|<1 where R is the raduis of convergence

#

with the d'alembert rule u find R=10

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@modern palm Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @modern palm

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

shadow lava
obtuse pebbleBOT
shadow lava
#

am I on the right track here?

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @shadow lava

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

hardy drum
#

The answers say my answer is wrong, wat did I do wrong?

timid silo
#

What does the answer say?

plain stag
#

you calculated the probability of 3 defective phones; the criterion is more than 2

#

there are more numbers that are more than 2, than just the number 3

hardy drum
#

Answer is 0.07548 I got 0.0595

hardy drum
timid silo
#

You can do 1 - P(0) - P(1) - P(2)

hardy drum
#

Thank u

#

Is b)I) not just 1/5 × 0.07548?

candid yarrow
obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@hardy drum Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

odd heath
#

im stuck on this problem

obtuse pebbleBOT
wooden cipher
#

!show

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.

#

@odd heath Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@odd heath Has your question been resolved?

odd heath
hybrid gull
timid silo
# odd heath

did you make a mistake in the differentiation?

#

you differentiate and equate it to zero, you get two values of x

#

based on that you redifferentiate put the value of x and find if f''(X) is +ve or -ve

#

there by you go upon

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@odd heath Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

clear sonnet
obtuse pebbleBOT
clear sonnet
#

How do I integrate this?

#

Having a bit trouble

#

My Initial attempt

timid silo
#

whats the main func

clear sonnet
#

but then I got stuck

timid silo
#

could you send that

clear sonnet
#

wdym

stone spoke
timid silo
clear sonnet
timid silo
#

then the denominator is 1/sqrt(1-y^2) which u need to trig sub

clear sonnet
#

I can't use trig sub

#

oh wait

#

nvm I can

#

Is this valid?

timid silo
#

yeah

#

yes

#

but what do you sub in as t?

#

cosx?

clear sonnet
#

I forgot the dy

clear sonnet
timid silo
#

y = sin t?

#

then 1-(sin t)^2 = (cos t)^2

#

yeah doesnt matter

#

even if you use cosx

#

it anyways gets cancelled

#

with the dy term

#

y = sint

#

dy = cost dt

#

cost above below gone

#

it becomes 1 + sint dt

#

then just split and integrate

clear sonnet
#

I haven't learned trig sub yet

#

how would I evaluate without trig sub

timid silo
#

dude trig sub isnt hard

#

you know basic trig youll get it...

#

but i dont know the algebraic way sorry

clear sonnet
#

you're good

grizzled shore
#

Do you know how to solve $\int \frac{1}{\sqrt{a^2-x^2}}, dx$

warm shaleBOT
#

frosst

clear sonnet
#

would that be sin inverse?

timid silo
#

sin^-1 x/a id assume

#

its a thing to remember

clear sonnet
#

yeah

#

sin inverse of (x/a)

grizzled shore
#

Yes

clear sonnet
#

ik how to do that

grizzled shore
#

Ok

clear sonnet
#

what about the 1+y

#

idk what to do about that

grizzled shore
#

So we need to be a little clever here

clear sonnet
#

if I set u = 1-y^2

#

I can't split the fraction up either

timid silo
#

integral of (1+sin t) = integral of 1 + integral of sin t

#

integral of 1 dt = t,

#

integral of ( sin t )dt = -cos t if i rmb

grizzled shore
#

$\int \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-y^2}} - \frac{\sqrt{1-y^2-1}}{\sqrt{1-y^2}}, dy$

warm shaleBOT
#

frosst

grizzled shore
#

Hmm that might not work

clear sonnet
#

DId you multiply by the conjugate?

clear sonnet
#

nvm then

polar fossil
#

$\int \frac{1+y}{\sqrt{1-y^2},dy = \int \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-y^2}},dy + \int \frac{y}{\sqrt{1-y^2}},dy$

warm shaleBOT
#

kitten.in.a.teacup
Compile Error! Click the errors reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)

clear sonnet
#

oh wait

#

This works right?

polar fossil
#

yeah

#

that's what i was trying to write but apparently forgot how to latex

clear sonnet
#

oh alright

#

Thanks 🙏

grizzled shore
#

Maybe you can do by parts

polar fossil
#

you don't need by parts; this is a very straightforward integral

#

once you have the trig thing

grizzled shore
#

But he doesn’t want to use trig

clear sonnet
#

I meant trig sub as in the method the person was talking about above where you do sin and cos or smth

#

but this is totally fine

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@clear sonnet Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

dry lantern
#

Can someone solve this for me? I don’t understand how to do this question

thick oracle
#

we can't solve it for you

#

only guide you

dry lantern
#

oh alright

#

So this is what I get rn

#

do i have to add lines to make it a cyclic quad.?

timid silo
#

how do you know that angle ECA = EPA = x

dry lantern
#

So ECA = x

#

and EA = EC

#

so the base angles r equal?

timid silo
timid silo
dry lantern
#

Ohhhh alright

#

I think ik what to do now

#

Thankss

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @dry lantern

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

fickle owl
obtuse pebbleBOT
vivid jolt
#

lemme see

#

I maybe can do this

vivid jolt
fickle owl
#

how did you figure that out?

#

maby i should increase the price a bit too

vivid jolt
#

Yes

versed imp
#

38 = (1+0.5)*19

#

Thus 240 = (1+x) * 38

#

Etc

vivid jolt
#

this is what I sis

#

did*

fickle owl
#

this feels like better price

fickle owl
vivid jolt
fickle owl
#

40, 55, 70, 85

vivid jolt
#

the 20 k 85?

fickle owl
#

feels like a good deal

fickle owl
vivid jolt
#

the 5k has a 85 percent off

fickle owl
#

oh

#

maby we can reverse it so the price is blank accept the "19" one and then figure out the price from the %off

vivid jolt
#

Tell me the exact %off you want for every product

#

also, is that for a game?

fickle owl
fickle owl
vivid jolt
#

alright

vivid jolt
#

also, for what I can see seems like a roblox one if I am not incorrect

candid yarrow
fickle owl
# vivid jolt about what?

its a wierd concept but you basicly buy small people that follow you and fight, when you kill someone you gain orbs wich can be used to buy small guys wiuth powerups such as invisibility and strength and freeze and such. then you go around the world and do quest and explore. you can also buy helicopters and cars for traveling and some tools to

vivid jolt
fickle owl
fickle owl
vivid jolt
vivid jolt
#

the 5 k with a 70 percent off would cost 1330

#

i dont think that makes much sense

fickle owl
#

that makes 0 sense

vivid jolt
#

you should make the price for 20 k higher

fickle owl
#

higher than 1140?

vivid jolt
#

Idk, just think about the prices you want to have, because 20 k is cheaper than 5 k

#

The 800 with a 55% off would cost 167

vivid jolt
#

?

#

wdym

fickle owl
#

5k is cheaper than 20k cus it costs 280

vivid jolt
#

the 20k without a discount would be 7600

fickle owl
#

oh right

vivid jolt
#

with a 85 percent is 1140

#

so, maybe lower the discounts

fickle owl
#

5k should be 1900 without discount

vivid jolt
#

correct

fickle owl
#

would this seem reasonable

vivid jolt
#

yeah, for me at least

#

i think

#

Maybe instead of 20 k you can but 10 k

sage dagger
#

roblox bleakkekw

fickle owl
vivid jolt
#

ig

fickle owl
#

its hard to balance how much a player makes when playing and how long it takes with how much stuff cost

fickle owl
vivid jolt
#

np

vivid jolt
fickle owl
#

cya

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @fickle owl

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

safe kite
#

so i learnt partial fractions today, but idk how to solve the ones with quadratic denominators

A(x^2 + 1) + (Bx + C)(x + 3) = 4x + 2
i wrote the expression as one line then i tried both methods i learnt today

first method is to eliminate one variable, but if i wanted to elimate A in i would have to do x^2 + 1 = 0 which doesnt have a real solution, and idk if u can eliminate B and C since they're in the same bracket

method two i didnt use for partial fractions with linear denominators as first method is easier for me, but i tihnk its smth to do with simultaneous equations and solving it. After expanding the brackets idk what to do after, cus idk how to solve simultaneous equations with 3 unknowns.

i prob gotta use method 2 to solve this, so can someone pls give me some help for solving this?

knotty crow
#

at the same time

#

in order to find A

#

then you have only 2 unknowns so I guess you can proceed

safe kite
#

oh what

#

how

knotty crow
#

plug x = -3

safe kite
#

oh wait shoot

#

i didnt realise they were connected together

#

mb

#

so after you find A how do you proceed

knotty crow
#

you can plug other values of x

#

to get 2x2 system

safe kite
#

2x2 system?

knotty crow
#

2 equations and 2 unknows

safe kite
#

oh

#

alr

#

ok i got it thanks

#

lemme try one more q then ill close the channel if im fine

#

ok im fine tysm

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @safe kite

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

wanton hull
#

$\int \frac{5x-2}{3x^2+2x+1} dx$

obtuse pebbleBOT
warm shaleBOT
#

bettim

versed imp
wanton hull
#

it is literally up there

#

i dont know how to start

#

status is 0 or 1 (whichever is least)

versed imp
#

Looks like a partial fractions decomposition problem

wanton hull
#

i dont know it

#

is it that A times der. of denom + B?

#

no like my teacher gave me that hint

#

i have to solve by that way

versed imp
#

what is der ? derivative ?

wanton hull
#

$5x -2 = A \frac{d(3x^2 +2x+1)}{dx} +B$

warm shaleBOT
#

bettim

wanton hull
#

my teacher did this in class

versed imp
#

If he gave u this hint u should use identification

wanton hull
#

okay im trying

versed imp
#

But either this way I don't understand the hint, I don't see where this leads

wanton hull
#

i got $\int \frac{\frac{5}{6}(6x+2) -\frac{11}{3}}{3x^2+2x+1} dx$

warm shaleBOT
#

bettim

wanton hull
#

wait now i can split it

#

and u'/u = log u

#

lol

#

wait fuck i forgot how to do int(1/quadratic)

#

$\int \frac{1}{3x^2+2x+1} dx$

warm shaleBOT
#

bettim

wanton hull
#

complete the square?

versed imp
#

Looks like

wanton hull
#

ues tahnk i got it

#

<33

versed imp
#

U found it ?

wanton hull
#

yep

#

got it

#

somehow his hints works

candid yarrow
wanton hull
#

any idea what it means?

wanton hull
warm shaleBOT
#

bettim

versed imp
wanton hull
#

,w integrate (5x-2)/(3x^2+2x+1)

versed imp
#

(thats the good answer)

#

idk if i can post it

wanton hull
#

thanks tho

#

only reason i hate calculus is even if you did all the steps and get a final answer sometimes it turns out to be wrong

#

thanks guys

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @wanton hull

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

wanton hull
#

$\int \frac{x+2}{\sqrt{4x-x^2}}dx$

obtuse pebbleBOT
warm shaleBOT
#

bettim

wanton hull
#

how do i do this

candid yarrow
#

have you tried completing the square

wanton hull
#

yes wait ill show where im struck

#

$\int \frac{x+1}{\sqrt{2^2 - (x-2)^2}}dx$

#

and

warm shaleBOT
#

bettim

wanton hull
#

$du = 2(x-2)dx$

warm shaleBOT
#

bettim

wanton hull
#

no idea how to proceed

high lily
#

express the numerator in the form
k*g'(x) + c

wanton hull
#

what is g(x)

#

what is k

#

idk

high lily
#

g(x) is the stuff under the root

#

k is a constant

wanton hull
#

oh oh

#

ohhhhhhhhh

#

wait

high lily
#

that allows you to apply chain rule for one fraction
and then trig sub / integral identity for the other

wanton hull
#

i got k =-1/2

#

c =4

#

got it tahnk you bros

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @wanton hull

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

cyan juniper
#

I need help with b), I'm unsure what to do after I sub in what I found in A

cyan juniper
#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @cyan juniper

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

timid silo
#

kind of silly question but we use the {{a}, {a,b}} definiton for ordered pair (a,b) because if we used {{a}, {b}} it would equal {{b}, {a}} so (a,b) = (b,a) and this is not true, right?

royal basin
#

that's one way to justify it yes

#

you need to be able to tell which element is the first and which is the second

warm canopy
#

yeah the latter has no way to distinguish an "order"

royal basin
#

that's the whole point of an ordered pair

timid silo
#

yeah thanks i was asking because previously i asked chatgpt and it said {{a}, {b}} doesn't equal {{b}, {a}} but simultaneously it said that the fact that they are equal is because we use the {{a}, {a,b}} and i got really confused 😭

native crag
#

i would be really careful asking gpt anything non computational

#

its good if you have no idea and it can vaguely point you somewhere

#

but you can literally make it say whatever you want if you phrase things right

timid silo
#

yeah ik but still deeply i have a hope that it would answer corerectly and explain things

native crag
#

apparently gpt4 is much better

#

but yeah its a little while off

timid silo
#

idk i think they nerfed it or something because in november 2022 it was a lot better

timid silo
royal basin
#

i asked chatgpt

timid silo
#

ik 😭

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @fossil birch

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

tawny kite
#

Need help with understanding, in the closed under addition example, how did it go from x_1+x_2=y_1+y_2 and y_1+ y_2= 2(z_1+z_2) to the equation shown below? Is the scalar 2 being ignored and why?

swift flume
#

I’m not sure I see the equation you’re referring to where 2 is being ignored

#

Could you highlight it ?

tawny kite
swift flume
#

If you look at part 1 it shows that 0=2(0)

#

And that y=0

#

So if y = 0 and y = 2z then z must also be 0

tawny kite
#

That makes sense

#

so condition 1 is satisfied

#

we're learning subspaces btw

swift flume
#

Yep! Lmk if you have any other questions

tawny kite
#

what about condition 2? The part highlighted in yellow?

swift flume
#

So you’re just adding the two vectors

#

When you add, you just add straight across

tawny kite
#

is there an example where the two vectors cant be added together?

swift flume
#

I think the only instance would be when you’re talking about different variables? If you think about a vector 3-dimensionally, you can’t add y length to an x length. You can only add y to y

#

I’ll write out an example

#

You can kind of think about it as adding but vertically

tawny kite
#

no like i get that, i mean an example thats asking if a set is in a subspace or not

#

and the vector addition doesnt work

swift flume
#

Ohhh

candid yarrow
swift flume
#

Oops

tawny kite
#

i was gonna say that too

#

cause you cant add 2x1 with 1x1

swift flume
#

I should’ve put a 0

candid yarrow
# swift flume

the second element of the third equation is not a member of the vector space that the first one is

candid yarrow
#

try proving/disproving this is a subspace

tawny kite
#

can you show what you mean by that?

#

I understand condition 1, where theres no 0 vector

#

which already proves that its not a subspace

#

but can you show how condition 2 works, where S is closed under addition.

candid yarrow
tawny kite
#

you have to use two vectors and add them together... smth like that

candid yarrow
# tawny kite

the first two are given, the third statement is what you want to prove or disprove

#

that’s because the first two come from the definition of the set and the third comes from the condition required to be a subspace

tawny kite
#

ok, so how can I prove or disprove?

candid yarrow
#

can you see what the sum of the components of the two vectors’ sum is?

tawny kite
#

You mean just add them?

candid yarrow
tawny kite
#

oh um no I just got 0 on the left side and 0=/=1, i was too lazy to erase it lol

candid yarrow
#

Can you add sentences in between the equations that explain what you’re doing, as if you were writing a proof?

tawny kite
#

ok

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@tawny kite Has your question been resolved?

tawny kite
#

please let me know if im doing it completely wrong

timid silo
#

can anyone help me with math

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@tawny kite Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

rain loom
obtuse pebbleBOT
rain loom
#

question b

frosty spoke
#

hmmm so if you're told the mode is 29

#

since there are no other modes, you know that at least one of p, q, r has to be 29

#

jeez this is annoying to do

#

my best guess would then be working on the median

#

probably can exclude p = 29 because it would push the median away from 28

#

and since this has an even number of things

#

you know that the median is going to be an arithmetic average of things

#

and to make 28 from 29, you need a 27

#

oh

#

that solves it doesn't it

polar fossil
sour ether
#

Should it be solved by forming equations?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@rain loom Has your question been resolved?

frosty spoke
#

actually is the solution even unique

#

oh I think it does have to be

#

because the only other cheap trick you can do is make p, q noninteger, but that's no good because then that means r has to be 29

#

and then you're toast because you can't make the mean line up

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

rancid cliff
obtuse pebbleBOT
rancid cliff
#

idk how to continue

#

could someone kindly help me

#

thanks 🙂

frosty spoke
#

oh you're asking how to integrate 1/sqrt(t) dt?

#

just write it as t^(-1/2) and use the power rule

#

didn't check the rest of the work though

rancid cliff
#

$-\int \frac{1}{2}t^{-\frac{1}{2}}dt$

#

?

warm shaleBOT
#

Chuti | Spanish

polar fossil
#

yeah

rancid cliff
#

actually

#

$-\frac{1}{2}\int t^{-\frac{1}{2}}dt$

warm shaleBOT
#

Chuti | Spanish

rancid cliff
#

but still I dont get the same result

polar fossil
#

those are equivalent but yeah

what do you get?

rancid cliff
#

tbh

#

I'm stucked

#

there

polar fossil
#

how would you do like $\int 7x^4 dx$?

rancid cliff
#

shouldnt it be (t^1/2 )1/2

#

nvm

#

idk what to do

#

I'm blocked

polar fossil
#

t^1/2 is the right exponent

frosty spoke
rancid cliff
polar fossil
#

yeah that's correct so far

rancid cliff
#

ok then thats t^-1/2

polar fossil
#

so when we integrate we add 1 to the power and then divide by the new power

rancid cliff
#

yes

polar fossil
#

divide by the new power (which is 1/2)

rancid cliff
#

aaaaaah

#

there you go

#

would be like this

#

then I replace t with what I wrote t was

#

and add C

#

ok cool

#

yeah I'm still learning just started yesterday

polar fossil
rancid cliff
#

Thanks for your help

polar fossil
#

and you can replace that with $\sqrt{t}$ if it looks nicer

warm shaleBOT
#

Hayley

polar fossil
#

well, negative sqrt t

rancid cliff
#

correct

#

💯

#

awesome

#

Thanks a lot

polar fossil
#

por nada

rancid cliff
#

I'll keep on studying

rancid cliff
polar fossil
#

es? oh se spanglish mexicano

rancid cliff
#

🤣

#

😄 good

#

Muchas gracias salute

rancid cliff
warm shaleBOT
rancid cliff
#

and what about this?

#

is that correct?

#

I'm trying with another t to practice

polar fossil
#

that's funny that that works but yeah it should, now what's your new integral?

#

(please don't forget the dx in the original integral)

#

and in your equations on the right

rancid cliff
#

u right

#

ok lemme see

#

sending the progress haha I think I'm dealing with chinese or something

#

hopefully I get what I'm doing this weekend of 5 days

polar fossil
#

that wasn't substituted properly

#

look you have $dt = \frac{x-6}{\sqrt{x^2-12x+1}},dx$ right?

warm shaleBOT
#

Hayley

rancid cliff
#

yes

polar fossil
#

solve that for dt and then make that substitution first

#

rather

#

solve that for dx

rancid cliff
#

isnt this correct?

#

So that I replace -x+6 with the result of the left

polar fossil
#

you need a clean cutover from x to t

rancid cliff
#

so I also pass the -x+6 ?

polar fossil
#

oh you know what you can do

#

you have $t = \sqrt{x^2-12x+1}$

warm shaleBOT
#

Hayley

polar fossil
#

so in that eqn you can make the left side -dt/t

rancid cliff
#

why? 🤔

polar fossil
#

so that when you make the substitution you're not mixing t's and x's in the integral

#

you'll have only t's

#

and dt

rancid cliff
# rancid cliff

sorry I still dont understand why this is wrong? our goal is to put everything in terms of t

polar fossil
#

and this doesn't have everything in terms of t

rancid cliff
#

ouch

#

🤣

#

wait

#

-dt/t

#

🤣

#

hahah

#

okay

polar fossil
#

yeah

rancid cliff
#

sorry mb

polar fossil
#

nw

#

wait where'd that other t even come from 💀

rancid cliff
#

it would be t^2

#

cause of this

#

I'll send a pic

polar fossil
#

yeah i found it

rancid cliff
#

$-\int \frac{1}{t^2}dt$

warm shaleBOT
#

Chuti | Spanish

polar fossil
#

i think that sqrt thing is supposed to be in the numerator

#

because what you should end up with is $\int -dt$

warm shaleBOT
#

Hayley

rancid cliff
#

the result is -t + c I think

#

I obviously replace t

polar fossil
#

yep

rancid cliff
#

$-\int t^{-2}dt$

#

🤔

warm shaleBOT
#

Chuti | Spanish

rancid cliff
#

this doesnt look right

#

I think

polar fossil
#

yeah that's not right

#

go back to your dt/dx calculations

rancid cliff
#

I did something... wrong.

#

I'll start all over again

#

and do it in order

#

shouldnt take much time

polar fossil
#

sure, start with $t = \sqrt{x^2-12x+1}$

warm shaleBOT
#

Hayley

polar fossil
#

differentiate both sides and keep the dx's around you can treat them just like any other variable

rancid cliff
#

ok this would be the first step, I assume its correct

polar fossil
#

t does not equal anything dx, it just equals a function of x

#

the dx comes from taking the derivative

#

(sorry i know this feels silly to worry about but it makes the math make more sense)

#

otherwise yeah that's right

rancid cliff
rancid cliff
rancid cliff
polar fossil
#

i mean you've got it

rancid cliff
#

yeah so int of dt is t

polar fossil
#

yeah

rancid cliff
#

so I replace and end of story

#

ok

#

cool

#

😄

polar fossil
#

what you've done there

rancid cliff
#

👏

polar fossil
#

was basically guess the integral with your choice of t lol

rancid cliff
#

did I ?

#

I feel like I followed a mathematical process

polar fossil
#

i mean you did and it was sound!

rancid cliff
#

I did this mechanically

#

haha

polar fossil
#

but yeah scratch out that dx at the end of the t = .... line

rancid cliff
#

💯

#

okay

#

gotchu

#

I can now say I finished this excercise 🤣

#

Thanks again

polar fossil
obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@rancid cliff Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @rancid cliff

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

split breach
obtuse pebbleBOT
tulip kestrel
#

!status

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin
2. I have begun but got stuck midway
3. I got an answer but I'm told it's wrong
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked
5. I have a question about someone else's worked solution
6. None of the above
split breach
#

1

somber marten
#

If you can use a calculator to find the sin it's possible to answer by this way

split breach
#

thank you

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @split breach

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

tight wave
obtuse pebbleBOT
tight wave
#

hello could someone explain how you get P(Y<=6) and P(Y>12)

#

i understand getting Y ~ Po(9) but not how you change them to that

#

since they usually just give it to you in the questions

mild harness
#

wdym

tight wave
#

like in the next one they do

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@tight wave Has your question been resolved?

tight wave
#

the topic is poisson approximation

#

a level further stats 1

tight wave
#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @tight wave

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

safe kite
#

whats the first step to simplfying this

obtuse pebbleBOT
timid silo
#

so that the top and bottom become the same

safe kite
#

can you factor 2^n+1 from the top to get 2^n+1(1 - (2^1))?

#

or -2^n+1

timid silo
safe kite
#

o

timid silo
#

try pulling out -(2^3)

#

because 2^(n+2) differs from 2^(n-1) by 2^3

safe kite
#

oh

#

uhhh would it be something like -2^3 * { 2^[(n+1)/3] + 2^[(n+2)/3 }?

timid silo
#

you need to send the latex script as its own message

#

i think

safe kite
#

idk how to use latex yet

timid silo
#

not divides by 3

safe kite
#

oh

timid silo
#

you only divide the exponent when there are fractional exponents or radicals

safe kite
#

ok so its -2^3 * [ -2^(n-2) + 2^(n-1)]?

#

ohh then you cancel that from both sides right

timid silo
#

yes

safe kite
#

so -2*3 = -8

#

ok thanks

timid silo
#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @weak sigil

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

mild harness
obtuse pebbleBOT
frosty spoke
#

you finally found a use for generating functions

mild harness
#

how

frosty spoke
#

oh wait N is not independent of the Xs uhhh

mild harness
#

i dont even know how to approach

#

first of all how do we know its not independent

#

i thought it was iid

frosty spoke
#

well N depends on the X_is

#

I think Wald's equation might work?

mild harness
#

whats that

#

should i skip this problem

#

like is it brurtally bad

frosty spoke
#

something something from stochastic processes that lets you transfer the E inside the sum

mild harness
#

brutally

frosty spoke
#

Not sure how you would compute the distribution of N though

#

well maybe it is computable actually

#

you might be able to compute some cumulative distribution of N

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@mild harness Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

quasi harness
obtuse pebbleBOT
quasi harness
#

Hello

#

need help please

#

can you please check my work

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@quasi harness Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@quasi harness Has your question been resolved?

candid yarrow
candid yarrow
# quasi harness

the first part of your justification is wrong, f(x) is not that

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

long hedge
#

how do you do this without a calculator ?

obtuse pebbleBOT
long hedge
#

i subtracted 360 7 times from 15 times 180

#

are you supposed to do that without a calculator

nocturne minnow
#

As a suggestion, if it gives you a value in terms of pi, it's best to keep it in pi

grizzled shore
#

What’s sin 0

long hedge
grizzled shore
#

What’s sin pi

grizzled shore
#

sin(ax) ≠ a*sin(x)

long hedge
grizzled shore
#

So sin 0 is 0

#

sin pi is 0

#

What’s sin n*pi for any integer n

long hedge
grizzled shore
#

Ok if I tell you sin(3) = k

#

What is sin(3 + pi)

long hedge
#

k + pi

grizzled shore
#

No!

#

sin(a + b) ≠ sin(a) + b

#

What do you know about the sine function

long hedge
grizzled shore
#

What’s y

long hedge
grizzled shore
#

What about sin

long hedge
#

sinx

grizzled shore
#

What are some properties of the sine function

long hedge
#

sin(theta+2pi)=sintheta

grizzled shore
#

What about sin(theta+4pi)=sintheta

long hedge
grizzled shore
#

What about sin(theta+15pi)=?

long hedge
grizzled shore
#

What no

grizzled shore
long hedge
grizzled shore
#

What does adding 1 pi do

#

Instead of 2

long hedge
#

180

grizzled shore
#

What is sin(θ + pi)

long hedge
#

180

#

0

grizzled shore
#

What is sine, where did this function come from

long hedge
#

so 12pi + 3pi = 180

long hedge
grizzled shore
#

Sine is not y

long hedge
#

do ppl realize playing the guessing game doesn't help us learn

grizzled shore
#

Consider the unit circle

#

If we go some angle θ

#

That red dot

long hedge
#

sine is the y value of the point

grizzled shore
#

It has the coordinates (cos(θ), sin(θ))

#

Ok that’s what you meant

long hedge
#

can we get to the point of finding the exact value idk what this detour is

grizzled shore
#

You didn’t say about the y value of a point

#

So if we go around pi radians

#

Whats the y value of this green dot

long hedge
#

so pi 1= 180 if you go around pi 14 times you are at 0 degrees (7 times 360)= 14 x 180)
if we have 15 pi you just need to add 180 once to get to 180 degrees sin180 = 0

grizzled shore
#

Yes

long hedge
#

wow thats actually genius

grizzled shore
#

That’s correct

#

But also, sin(pi) = -0

long hedge
#

???

grizzled shore
#

Or sin(θ + pi) = -sin(θ)

long hedge
#

this is 15 times pi

grizzled shore
#

Yes

#

But 14 of them get you to the same place

#

sin(θ + 15 pi) = sin(θ + pi) = -sin(θ)

long hedge
#

the answer is 180 not -180

#

it gets to the same point anyway ig

grizzled shore
#

The answer is 0

#

Which is the same as -0

#

Which is the point

long hedge
grizzled shore
#

sin(θ + 2pi) = sin(θ) right?

long hedge
#

sin(θ + 16 pi) = sin(θ) = -sin(θ)

#

^ this is right ?

grizzled shore
#

First 2 are right

#

Idk where you got sin(θ) = -sin(θ) from

long hedge
grizzled shore
#

That doesn’t have 16 in it

long hedge
grizzled shore
#

No!!!

#

Wait yes

long hedge
#

i am a better teacher than you💀

grizzled shore
#

You’re swapping to degrees and not having brackets

long hedge
#

ok i have it now

grizzled shore
#

But either way, you go 7 times around

#

Then 1 time to the other side of the circle

#

But since you’re at 0, the opposite side is -0 which is still 0

long hedge
#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @long hedge

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

halcyon linden
#

show that there are no $x$ such that $103|(x^3 - 2)$

warm shaleBOT
#

brunood

halcyon linden
#

i tried writing $x$ as $x^3 = 103k + 2$

warm shaleBOT
#

brunood

halcyon linden
#

but that lead me nowhere

#

i dont need the answer right away if there are any tips or important theorems i should know thats already good help

royal basin
#

so your goal is to show that x^3 can never be congruent to 2 mod 103 huh

halcyon linden
#

yea

royal basin
#

hm

halcyon linden
#

i had similar questions before but the modulus wasnt prime so it was easier bc you could factor

royal basin
#

i don't see a way other than brute force at the moment

somber marten
#

x has to be integer?

halcyon linden
#

yep

royal basin
polar fossil
somber marten
#

You have to show that $103k ≠ x^3 - 2$?

warm shaleBOT
#

arthur1102

halcyon linden
#

ig so but it would be more showing that there are no integer k that satisfies it

#

so maybe induction could work?

wooden cipher
#

Mod 9 and some other mod probably

halcyon linden
#

the one i did before was to show that there are no integer $x$ such that $x^2 \equiv 35 \mod 100$ and you did that with a contradiction, tldr $100|x^2 - 35 \implies 5|x \implies 25|x^2 \implies 25|35$ (contradition) but i cant see a way i can do that here since 103 and 2 are prime and obviously share no factors

warm shaleBOT
#

brunood

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@halcyon linden Has your question been resolved?

royal basin
#

hmm

#

i have an idea but it is kind of heavy-duty and group-theoretic

#

the group of units of Z/103Z has order phi(103) = 102 = 2 * 3 * 17