#help-10
1 messages · Page 195 of 1
putridplanet
$\frac{2xh+h^2-6-6}{h}$
putridplanet
im guessing one of the 6's was supposed to be positive but idk how
You dropped parens here
putridplanet
this better
Yep
@long hedge Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @long hedge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Sorry to ask another question, but how would you do this? I can't find the ratio
did you make any attempt to find the ratio
yeah I tried but I couldn't find it, I tried using x and listing out the arcs. i did 686, 686x, 686x^2 and then 128
i wasnt sure if i was correct in my approach though
what's the fourth arc in terms of x
Closed by @reef jasper
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Suppose that point is on a circle with radius $10$ cm, and ray $OP$ is rotating with angular velocity $\frac{\pi}{8} \frac{\text{radian}}{\text{second}}$.
mXd
b) Find the distance traveled by P along the circle in $6$ seconds.
mXd
I would first calculate the radians the point travels and convert that into cm
so (pi/ 8 sec)(10 cm)=5pi cm / 4 sec
thats the linear velocity
Not quite
First you have to multiply it by the seconds it travels for
And then calculate the circumference
And divide that by 2pi bc that's how many rad you have in a circle
And then multiply by the number of rad you have
(3/8)(20pi)=15pi/2
wait
isnt linear velocity equal to radius times angular velocity
This should be correct
Not sure
ok i did (pi/8 rad/sec)(10 cm)
Yes i think
and got linear velocity=5pi/4 cm/sec
Why is linear velocity relevant-
you can use it to find the distance
so (5pi/4 cm/sec)(6 sec)=30pi/4 cm
=15pi/2 cm
Closed by @serene swift
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Np
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what does this question mean
find $\theta$ such that $\cot\theta=0$ where $\theta$ is in between 0 and 720 degrees
XxMrFancyu2xX
is it just the x and y cooridnates of tan theta but reciprocal
wait that doesn't make sense
nvm im just not awake
lol
find a $\theta$ such that $\frac{\cos\theta}{\sin\theta}=0$ or in other words $\cos\theta=0$
XxMrFancyu2xX
isnt cos the x coordinate
yep :))
so like 90 , 270 , 450 etc
how come when i type 1/tan(90) in my calucalotr it says error since tan 180is 0
is undefined because division by 0 is mega cring
sin / cos so cot is cos/sin
yep, now put cos(90)/sin(90) into your calculator :))
why dpes it say error
uhhh
my brothers calcualtor is just ass then
yea maybe consider using a different calculator
it should say 0 tho rught instead of error
yep
Closed by @silent jolt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
The chapter is explaining how to show a limit doesn't exist by negating the delta-epsilon definition of a limit. Where did it get |f(x)| = 1 from? And why is x0 = d/2?
nobody is claiming f(x) itself is 1.
it is |f(x)| that is 1
And why is x0 = d/2?
it'll be d/3 next time you ask
What do you mean?
it's arbitrary, we just need to divide by something to make it smaller than d
could be d/3, could be d/7, we choose d/2 because it's simple and works for us
Ahh, makes sense
And how did they arrive at |f(x)| = 1?
f(x) = x/|x|
I got |f(x) - L| = |x/|x| - 0| < e (which is 1/2)
this is 1 for positive x and -1 for negative x
I thought we couldn't take 1 as a bound because then f(x) will be inside the epsilon range
Wait wait, is it because x/|x| = x/x = 1?
Was I too blind to notice that
when x>0, x/|x| = x/x = 1
when x<0, x/|x| = x/-x = -1
That was so obvious, I just realized haha
Thanks for the help!!
.close
Closed by @fair whale
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin
2. I have begun but got stuck midway
3. I got an answer but I'm told it's wrong
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked
5. I have a question about someone else's worked solution
6. None of the above
1
do you know how to solve linear equations in general?
ye
Then what's the issue here?
somehow the answer is a fraction
$-8x+24=10x$
nicholas
$24=18x$
nicholas
$x=0.75$
nicholas
how are you getting x=0.75
18 divided by 24
why are you dividing 18 by 24
Shouldn't this be the other way around
i dont know
wait
1.333
into fraction is 4/3
oh my goddd
4/3 is the answer
what methods have you been taught to solve something like that?
have you attempted applying that to the problem?
nicholas
not sure if its right or not
show how you got there
if its the same you would subtract but since its different i would add
so 3x+4x is 7x
wait
there woulnt be a y
because they cancel out
y would be gone
so $7x=28$
nicholas
that looks good
$x=0.25 or 1/4$
nicholas
im looking at my calculator right now
calc won't give you what you need if you don't enter the correct thing
nicholas
consider what you could do to 7x that'll give you just x
and perform that action on both sides
now we apply to equationm
don't divide stuff in a random order
i know
i got confused
with the other one since that was in a different order than this one
now that you have x, do you think you can find y?
$4(4)+y=10$
nicholas
$16+y=10$
nicholas
$y=6$
nicholas
final answer
no
(4,6)
how are you getting
y=6
minus 16 from both sides
10-16 isn't 6
nicholas
(4,-6)
yes
1% = 1/100 = 0.01
use whichever depending on personal preference
could i do 30500 x 10.4/100
@balmy sequoia Has your question been resolved?
yes
yes
Closed by @balmy sequoia
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
which is correct
the first picture has a mistake, since you're supposed to divide by P(B)
so it should be 2/5
Oh wait
second picture is fine
Closed by @balmy sequoia
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how to put division in text pot
bot
$\div$
maximofs
like that?
use superior fraction notation
if you're going to use the bot
\frac{numerator}{denominator}
what abt multiply
use \cdot
.
try avoid \times
maximofs
nicholas
nicholas
(y)^3 is y^3,
but that isn't timesing anything by 3
also you should not be using "times" as a verb
for like index law
nicholas
would it become $2^3x^6y^3$
nicholas
sure would
Closed by @balmy sequoia
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
having a problem with c)
what can i say?
Tried making the denominators common?
- There is no axis of symmetry on zero
- Irrelevant to the equation
Just make the denominators common in $\frac1{e^x + 1} + \frac1{e^{-x} + 1}$
A Lonely Bean
i got zero
Show your work
e^x * e^-x is 1
there is 2 already in the other side
Yes, it does
That's the conclusion
f(x) + f(-x) = 1 is equivalent to 0 = 0 and 0 = 0 is true
So f(x) + f(-x) = 1 is true as well
Just write e^-x = 1/e^x
1/(e^x+1)+1/(1/e^x +1)
1/e^x+1 +e^x/e^x+1
e^x+1/e^x+1 = 1
it's not that simple xD
wait a minute it's f(x) + f(2a - x) = 1 where a = 0 isn't it?
It is 
it's center symetry as well
Don't use chatgpt 
why?
ok
so it's axes of symmetry?
because f(x) = -f(2a - x) + 2b
Yeah, but you are gonna end up proving that equation that way or another
There is no point in mentioning that
that what my teacher used to say
maybe because our system is different
thanks for help
.close
Closed by @vestal trout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
nah
Wait
so
for the first equation
you want to times everything by 5
which will be 20x + 15y = 45
And second equation we multiply by 4 or we just multiply the first
all goods
there
Nope
alr
k
only minus?
yep
positive times negative
45-52=-7
will always be negative
its okay
Now we divide
=-1
yep
bingo
we found what y was
now we solve X
pretty much we should plug in -1 to either equation 1 or 2
so now it’s -15
yes
what do you uae to make dat
It will be 45+15?
20x = 60
?
what program do you use to write that stuff
oh
Notes
google docs lol
I think
zam
?
yeah that is what i asked
anyways thanks now I understand the whole thing
you didnt undwrstand so i rewrote the question
I do have one question tho
no worries
sure what is it
Why do we only do minus
since we are trying to solve what y is first
and we see both 20x in the same equation
we minus it to get rid of it to make it easier
wait let me check the answe
an even more rarer is multiplication and division
@gloomy trail how do you have 2 full blown active conversation in 2 diffrent channels
tbh i dont even know ☠️
how did u even see
i was writing a long paragraph for a question when you took the channel 😠 so i remembered you were asking and i was scrolling down and i noticed you were asking a question and i scrolled down and you were answering a wuestion soo
ohhh.
sorry for taking ur channel
oh unlucky
Nvm I do
A bit left
tho
lol
ok I did x
Wait is the firs tone X
one
which is x and which is y
or is the first one y
And second X
@gloomy trail
sorry im back
technixhally it wasnt anyones to begin with
but because of you i got help-1 😎
If it’s X or y
oh alright
damnn lucky u
I’m doing 2
you can do enlimination but you can go cool with 3x+8y=5x+3y and subtitute x for 5/2y
sure since its easier
yes its correct way
simultaneous equation is for
linear relationships
What
those to numbers 2 and 5 will be a point (2,5)
Oh alr
Oh that’s formula we use
ALR IM TAKING A BREAK FOR 1H AND PLAY FORTNITE
yoo
I been studying for 6h
which region u play on?
whats ur default?
Wait what do u play on
oceania
I’m in the Middle East
oh man rip
ohhh won’t work for me
yup
have fun with ur game
Ima play bio
go ahead
.close
Closed by @ruby elm
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
There is a point p(x,y,z) and it's distance from
X axis is $root(y^2+z^2)$
Y axis $root(x^2+z^2)$
Z axis $root (x^2+y^2)$
So how these three equation are derived? I wanted to know most plane,line formulas derivation which is presented directly in books. Help
! Arjunn
Thank you ma'am
Hmm yes
Then distance formula in 3d?
Ohh got it thanks
One more doubt, most derivations aren't available in my 3d book what should I do?
Like angle between planes, lines
most angle shit comes down to angles between vectors in one way or another
I am just learning these formulas with root method
No proofs only formulas
. close
.close
Closed by @astral aurora
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
,rotate
Im not sure how to do question ii)
sorry im new to vectors but im not sure what expression to get for ii) and how that expression would show FE is parallel to DC
Then, what is FE?
well i got an expression for FE but its probably wrong
i got FE = -r-kp+q
and it said in terms of k and p so im wrong there too
No, I mean I don't know which points are E AND F
oh
It isn't mentioned
i have a diagram above
Oh yes I didn't see before
yeah all goods
🤗
wait quick question
i find that you wrote both of the vectors backwards which i assume doesnt really change anything, but is there a specific reason for that
oh nvm
i just drew my diagram wrong, but the answer is still valid
thanks!
.cloes
.close
Closed by @proper kelp
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
For part b) am I making the wrong D.E?
@timid silo Has your question been resolved?
@timid silo Has your question been resolved?
physics thing, and you can derive it using chain rule actually
$v = \dv{x}{t}$
Riku
yes
That's not the problem
The problem is the q says 1/10 v
The ms is using 1/10 v^2
Also that's the mark scheme
@timid silo Has your question been resolved?
@timid silo Has your question been resolved?
@timid silo Has your question been resolved?
i dont think his problem was resolved
@timid silo Has your question been resolved?
nope
@timid silo Has your question been resolved?
.
By comparison with the solution, there is a missing r dot on the left hand side?
Yeah bcz the part b q says
Resistive forces have mag. 1/10v
But the ms is using 1/10 v^2
I don't understand why it's doing that
Am I reading the q wrong
Maybe it comes from power?
https://byjus.com/question-answer/derive-relation-between-power-force-and-velocity/
No that's not the problem
I used the eq of power for the driving force correctly
$$1600\ddot r = \frac{100000}{\dot r} - \frac{1}{10}\dot r$$
brotherImusttalk1234
This is the differential equation I get
That's my problem
Ms is using v^2 at the end tho
I used p/v correctly I've got the same second term as the ms... Third term is missing a v term but idk am I reading thenresistive force line wrong
v(dv/dx) = (dx/dt)(d(dx/dt)/dx)
= (dx/dt)(d^2x/dtdx)
= d^2x/dt^2 = x dot dot
Ok I think ur DE is correct. The mysterious v seems to come from r dot dot = v dv/dr
Oh that's v easy to get lol
One sec lemme show
I derived it above
Huh
I think
Huh wait then shouldn't the P/v be P
Anyway I think ur DE is correct and matches the solution DE. Right?
No
It doesn't
Why not?
That's the problem
This is mine.
$$1600\ddot r = \frac{100000}{\dot r} - \frac{1}{10}\dot r$$
In the ms it's...
$$1600\ddot r = \frac{100000}{\dot r} - \frac{1}{10}\dot r^2$$
brotherImusttalk1234
Take this eqn and substitute the r dot dot with v dv/dr. Divide by right hand side and then multiply by dr to get the second to last line?
Oh no... Its v cubed...
Now u see it
The link https://byjus.com/question-answer/derive-relation-between-power-force-and-velocity/
says P = Fv
If F = 1/10v Newtons then
P = 1/10v^2? =/= P/v
The d.e is for force
Man
P = Fv
Ik that
But the de is for F=ma
Not for P
That's why it's ma=P/v - R
R being resistive force
I think the de in the ms is wrong leave it be
.close
Closed by @thorn jacinth
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I think the resistive force is 1/10v N not 1/10v^2 N
That's what I said too
But the differential equation is not for power
It's for force
Power doesn't necessarily have superpositions like that
Force does bcz it's a linear quantity
And then the P/V term and the ma term deffo don't make any sense
I was commenting that the first equation in the solution picture doesn't make sense because it says P/v = 1/10v^2 but F = 1/10v and Fv = 1/10v^2 which is power not P/v
Ah ok
Oki oki
But just saying power doesn't necessarily add up like that
So making a de for power anyways won't be correct
You can close the channel honestly
@timid silo Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @torpid torrent
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I will type my solution here, I got stuck somewhere
oh ncm
nvm
lol i forgot to take the derivative
i will still type regardless
$
\vec{R}'(u) = \langle -12 \cos(3u), 5, 12 \sin(3u) \rangle
\\t_0 = 0
\\s = \int_{t_0}^{t} \|R'(u)\|
\\s = \int_{0}^{t} \sqrt{144 + 25} du
\\s=13t
\\t = \frac{s}{13}
$
steamhahasteamhaha
then
eh not gonna type it
you just sub t xD
am I wrong
can someone tell me pls
also why do we write it as $\vec{R}^*(s)$
steamhahasteamhaha
looks good to me. I've not seen this star notation for labeling the arclength parameterization but I guess it's just a way of distinguishing it from the original function.
nice
@opaque galleon Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @opaque galleon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I dont understand how step 2-3 works
Complete the square
wdym
Have you heard of completing the square
no
Have you heard of quadratics
I dont speak english so like I dont know any of the english terminology
What do you speak
dutch
Is deutsch dutch
no
What’s Dutch in Dutch
I can speak english fluently I just dont know the mathematics terminologies because I dont get taught in english
nederlands
Kwadraatsplitsen is het herschrijven van een tweedegraadspolynoom die gegeven is in de vorm
f
(
x
)
=
a
x
2
+
b
x
+
c
{\displaystyle f(x)=ax^{2}+bx+c}
tot de vorm...
Have you seen that word before?
ye
That’s what they are doing
In here
so what you normally do is just use x right instead of 2
and do like x (2x + 5) + 3
or smth
Can you show me how you would complete the square on x² + 2x + 3
uh
Complete the square is whatever this word is
x(x + 2) + 3
Where’s the square
Expand (x+1)²
x^2 + 1 + 2x
Is that close to this
yeah
oooooh right
I forgot you could do that
that would be
id know if it was -3 but idk tbh
yeah im lost idk
<@&286206848099549185>
@grizzled shore dunno if you mind but would you help me again?
Um
So (x+1)² gets you the x² + 2x
But it also comes with an annoying +1 that we don’t want
So let’s just do (x+1)² - 1
That way when we expand we get just x² + 2x
Do you follow?
yeah
Ok we just add +3 on this then
(x+1)² -1 + 3
so +2
this one also isnt possible in that form
Think about what kind of (x+a)² expanded gives us x² + 6x
Then we’ll deal with the extra bits later
(x+3)^2
+9
And we don’t want that
So let’s just take 9 away from this
Now we have (x+3)² -9
But we don’t just want x² + 6x
We want x² + 6x - 5
So what do we do
-14?
(x+3)^2 -14
Btw notice that a is half of 6
would we do it in the same form as the last one
Because expanding (x+a)² gives us x² + 2ax + a²
ig
And also notice that we always get the a² that we don’t want
So for any x² + bx + c the general form is (x + b/2)² - (b/2)² + c
2(x^2 + 2,5x) + 3
so now you want to uh stick a fraction in there
$2\left(x^2 + \frac{5}{2}x\right) +3$
frosst
so 2(x + 1 1/4)^2 +3 - 1,5625
idk what fraction the last one is so I just did that
huh
ok but is it right tho
because when I look at the answer sheet it says it isnt but to me it looks like I did it right
How did you get 1.5625
But that’s inside the bracket
yeah but wouldnt you have to add a counter thing to make it so you can square it in the first place
because this and 2(x + 1 1/4)^2 +3 both have different outcomes
$2\left(\left(x+\frac{5}{4}x\right)^2- \left( \frac{5}{4}\right)^2\right)+3$
frosst
$2\left(\left(x+\frac{5}{4}x\right)^2- \left( \frac{5}{4}\right)^2\right)+3 \neq 2\left(\left(x+\frac{5}{4}x\right)^2\right)- \left( \frac{5}{4}\right)^2+3$
frosst
$2\left(\left(x+\frac{5}{4}x\right)^2- \left( \frac{5}{4}\right)^2\right)+3 = 2\left(\left(x+\frac{5}{4}x\right)^2\right)- 2\left( \frac{5}{4}\right)^2+3$
frosst
ok that makes sense kinda
You missed multiplying it by 2 before moving it out of the bracket
Closed by @unreal vessel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How can i start
,rotate
,rotate
what is that, I can't read it well
8
that looks like an eight
8 😅
Well i only see that ✓15 will be gone after the root gets ridden of
let a := (4-sqrt(15))^1/3, then your equation is a^x + (1/a)^x = 8
But how am i supposed to see that they're reciprocal
And can i just delete the third root like that
@vapid pecan Has your question been resolved?
i did not delete the cube root
i simply incorporated it into the value of a
Then my equation is (³✓a)^x + (³✓1/a)^x = 8
Oh
You did 1/3
That removes the root right
@vapid pecan Has your question been resolved?
$a^{1/3} = \sqrt[3]{a}$
kitten.in.a.teacup
Am i doing something wrong
what the heck is squiggle
anyway it's b^2 - 4ac not just b^2 - 4
Well a and b is 1
.
I just did t and not a
and c is 7, but also you can just factor it
Its 1

I just write ugly
oh okay
What does factor mean
like turning x^2 + 3x + 2 into (x+1)(x+2) but that's not possible here
you had the right idea setting m = t^x and then it's a quadratic
But i get root of 60
And the urge to end my life
And then i have t^x = 4 + ✓15
Oh but i do have t
This might be possible actually
might be!
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
I haven't run the numbers myself but it's fairly straightforward to check a solution
There's no solution
,rotate
why is it obvious that it's 3?
It removes the root
you have a 1/ and a negative exponent but I think you want one or the other
Nah it should be without -
But i put it there
So it becomes 1/
Wich is equal to the other side
Bc these are reciprocals
Yeah but it will be 1/
With 3
I have 4-✓15 + 4 + ✓15 =8
Which is correct
Um
I think both are correct
3 and -3
Oh
Ok
Ill kms
There's also m2
I thought 4-✓15 is under 0
But it isnt
😅😅😅😅😂😂😅😂😅😂😅😂😅😂😅😅😅😅😅😅
. close
.close
Closed by @vapid pecan
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
cancel the log on both sides
But the base isnt the same
How
you can change the base using the formula
$\log_{b^c} a = \frac 1c \log_b a$
Oh yeah there's something like that
NEONPerseus
Kay got it
Unnecessary here
yeah but it s in general
4 = 2^2
you can t do that because of that 1/2
so using the properties of log that 1/2 goes to the power
But i can put it as ^?
ye
Whats that called btw
raise to the power
Should be like this then?
exactly
and now
you must check those values if they give you a true statement if you put them in the original form
in this one
Am i on the right path for this one?
Ignore the last row ik its incorrect
But am i supposed to go witg this formula
ye it s good
But what do i do
ok wait i ll try to solve it and see if you can do it some easier way
Is there?
well not really
so
use the properties of log for the disivion and multiplication of the arguments
and then to be easier you can renote log 5 of x = t or some letter
and then solve the equation
yes
there are 3 results because it s polynomial equation with a 3rd grade
send me a pic pls
How
only x must be positive

