#help-10
1 messages · Page 171 of 1
Actually i will say something useful for advanced concepts like this try and use the specific topic channel as you might get answer faster
Yup i will see it
Oh, so next time I post in ODEs and PDEs channel?
But this is under PDEs
Can you say full form of pde
Partial differential equations
I think I’ll try in PDEs channels since this is under this topic
Umm i don't want to read the theory you sent can you please summarise it for me
I can understand wave parts
And also pde
But then why are we finding wavelength
I’m not use, it’s a heat equation solving using Fourier series
And what is c and p
That’s why I’m blur
Yea
I don’t know
This is found from the mathematical methods shown in textbook
Umm can you just highlight the place where cp is mentioned in sinosodul equation
So why lamda is equal to cp?
There is a seperate chanel for pde and ode
Wow
Oh ok @scenic fjord
I will send a pic of what they are speaking
Huh? I just want to know why lamda is equal to cp
Just one question ma'am can you pls say what that p is
Is it the time period
Or frequency
I already put in the red box
I also can’t see what p means
P is obtained from previous solution
Just sub it
The point now is, I wanna know why lamda is equal to cp
After I know this, I can proceed with the textbook workings
Erm, I don’t think it is
Anyway, I just see again and I know why lamda is cp
Erm
I will explain why p is npi/l
This is wave in physics right ?
I learnt this before and well, I mislook wave equation to heat equation
Anyway, actually I have no idea why we need to solve like this
Umm you mean like the book or mine?
The book
The normal solving method with waves I already learnt
Mathematical method for physics
Hmm, I learnt wave in y1 without knowing fourier series
Because it’s a textbook for engineering mathematics
Ma'am can i DM and can you explain why we use Fourier series in wave ?
Closed by @scenic fjord
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help with this
you mean -1 and 1?
find where f(x)=g(x) is what I would do, but there might be a better way
Always works?
if you use g(x)=f(x) works?
how did you determine that a -1 and b 1
someone
@north anchor Has your question been resolved?
khm
idk but it seems like about solving quadratic equation to get a and b
graphs are intersecting so... x^4 -4x^2+1=x^2-3 => x^4 - 5x^2 +4 =0
On Viet 1 and 4 are roots for x^2
that's about all
simple?
how you know if a or b
the area is calculated under curve
here between one curve over Ox and anouther negative curve under Ox
oh i see
gpt chat told me that to know if a function is superior or inferior, you had to evaluate both functions by the interval
@north anchor Has your question been resolved?
If it's hard for you to find the intervals a and b by finding the roots of a degree-4 equation, you can call x^2 a variable like t, and solve for t like a normal degree-2 equation
Now that you have t, you can find x by calculating the square root of t
I know but I don't understand why a = -1 and b = 1 and not vice versa
If you calculate it as I said, you should get a = -1 and b = 1
You did it, and got something else?
I didn't understand
You didn't understand this^?
So why did you say "I know"?
and my advice is, try to understand it
What part of it is unclear?
I mean, I don't want to find a and b. I want to identify if it is the interval a or b.
Cause any other root of the equation would be out of it
These two, the only other-roots of the equation, are out of the interval that you want
The largest number is b nd the smallest number is a?
The largest number?
yes a is negative , -1 and b is 1
In the set of the common values of the area of the first equation and the second equation, yes
will it always be like this?
What do you mean by always?
By changing what object?
a must be less than b and b must be greater than a
If it swaps, the answer would just get negative
integral f from a to b = -1 * integral f from b to a
yes
@north anchor Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
could someone explain plz how they drew that graph on the uv axis
like i dont get what they based that on
the sketch
R is the region represented by that rectangle on the u-v basis of R^2
how does it give a length of 3 tho
it doesnt look it
from the xy plane
Change of basis
It's linear algebra
Of course they're not the same geometrically
But they describe the same region of R^2
And with all the jacobian stuff you can see how the integral is transferred from one basis to the other
You take one region from one "paper" and you "re-map" it onto a different "paper"
That's how I think of Jacobians
@silver plover Has your question been resolved?
makes sense
thanks
.close
Closed by @silver plover
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
surely it would be easy to substitute it in and try
if y=-7e^(2x)
find y'
and then find y''
plug all of those in
is it equal to 0?
if so, true. If not, false
dy/dx
missed a letter but yeah
y''=-28e^(2x)
how do i solve the DE after plugging it all in
i plugged it in, i'm just not sure what to do now
simplify
if the left hand side is equal to the right hand side, then that is a solution
then it’s not a solution
yep
what about this one?
This one can be done using separation i'm pretty sure
Just by looking at it, it's probably false. But how would I show that?
plug it in again
I got y=e^(x+((x^2)/2)))
you don’t need to solve the ode
oh
you can just plug in the y
where did that come from
finding the derivative of y=(x^(2)e^(x))(1+x)
then plug them into the equation, and see if the lhs = rhs
it does?
can i see your work?
Oh i see where i went wrong
Yeah it's false too
Not sure about this one
nevermind i got it
@exotic nebula Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @exotic nebula
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have two lines y=-300r+9000 (IS) and y= 20r + 1500. (LM) My problem asks which policy (fiscal or monetary) will be most effective. Based on our notes it says that depending on which slope is steeper will decide which policy is better. Here I thought the first slope was steeper but according to my prof. and everyone else it's not, so I'm confused about how the first slope isn't steeper.
@tight pike Has your question been resolved?
@tight pike Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @tight pike
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I am working on a problem similar to f(x,y)=xye^x^2 D=[-2,2]x[-2,2]
I have a question asking me to do the following :⦁ Find the absolute maxima and minimum by evaluation f on the boundary of D
what does that mean
The boundary of the domain is made up of four line segments, for example, along the straight line connecting (-2,-2) and (-2, 2). Consider the function (on this line segment) f(-2, -2) = 4e^4, -2 <= y <= 2.
While I appreciate the rewording, I still don't know what that is asking me to do
I wouldn't describe it as a rewording.
ok i agree with you
You are trying to apply this theorem. If the extrema occur within the boundary (not on it) they will occur at the critical points. But they may exist on the boundary curve. You effectively need to consider four functions as suggested above to be able to determine the absolute maxima and minima.
Note. For clarity hypothesis 2 means some f(a, b) inside the boundary is higher than f(x, y) along the whole of the boundary. It might be clear but I, for some reason, got confused by it. Of course, a analogous theorem exists for minima.
@foggy pumice Has your question been resolved?
ok so ive read this 15 times now. how would I apply this? theres a lot of symbols here I have never seen before
whats the name of this theorem maybe? that way I could look it up to see its application?
@foggy pumice Has your question been resolved?
@foggy pumice Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @foggy pumice
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I am trying to find all the critical points of $\newline$ $\dot{x}=(2-x-y)x$ $\newline$ $\dot{y}=(x-1)y$
AustinU
I think that they are, (0, 0), (1, 1), and (2, 0)
Could anyone confirm, or point out if I am missing something?
what does the dot notation mean?
AustinU
physics derivative
it means derivative
got it, thx
I don't know what ZFT is
so two lines
so either x=0, or 2=x+y
yea
intercepts (2,0) and (0,2)
and also the yaxis
do the same for the y nullcline
if x=0, the only critical point that comes from that is if y=0
so (0, 0)
if 2=x+y
doing too much casework i think
how would I do it with the lines instead?
you have two lines so far
sorry if I brushed over that
one is the line connecting (2,0) and (0,2)
and the entire y-axis
then from the y nullcline, you get either y=0, or x=1
so you have the origin as stationary
then, the line connecting (2,0) and (0,2) crosses the y=0 line
then, the x=1 line crosses the line connecting (2,0) and (0,2)
3 stationary points
i think?
you may need to graph
here
anywhere a blue line crosses a green line is stationary
since it produces a zero factor in each equation
but you could just as easily create this plot by hand too
oh that is cool, I didn't ever see that you could do it that way before
usually they arent nice lines lol
produces the same three points (0,0), (1,1), and (2,0) that I got

.close
Closed by @fathom flicker
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm reclaiming this from the same question as above
So I found the critical points of the system
I found them to be: (0,0) (1, 1) (2,0)
and now I want to linearize the system near these critical points
Starting with the (0, 0) critical point
what class is this
could I just linearize it as x'=0 y'=0
I'm just self-studying some differential equations
so im gonna bastardize is
isnt the linearization like
youll take the partial of xdot wrt x
wel li can write it
yea
then you evaluate it
you wind up with a 2x2 matrix
you use the poincare diagram
to make your life easy

poincare diagram?
One second, I am going to look at my notes on the jacobian and see if I can't figure out how to linearize near the critical points
classification of 2x2 linear systems
yea 
there are cooler things also called poincare diagrams
there are cooler things also called poincare diagrams
poincare maps
I saw someone in diffeq channel earlier with one of those I think
something about it being a cross section model of a system in higher than 3D right?
what are you taking right now?
just a tiny bit 😉
lol
well congrats that is super cool
What was your favorite part / favorite class?
or least favorite
if you particularly disliked it
XD
i hated analysis
i like making graphics
so all the classes i got to make cool animations for
dynamics was a big one
also math biology
and neuroscience
made this one but i dont think we will use it 
for my last class
does that one have a short explanation or is it too above my grasp probably
what's it mean?
its a slowed down bird song, we are like
summing up the frequencies that are present in a way
i cant really explain it either 
aha no worries. Still cool
one second I am going to try to do the problem I started this with
its using a bunch of FFT's to pluck out the dominant frequencies
then I'll be back
see this part I can understand a bit
i made it run on every 100 or so samples of the audio so you can see the dominant frequencies appear alongside when you hear them
theyre distinct enough in this recording, not all layered

is that also about the bird songs?
what topic is that
youre in 2d nonlinear systems
or is it just bifurcation
ODEs
its dynamical systems
you are already looking at more interesting 2d systems apparently
you could look at like hopf
or study the 1d ones
theyre just cool is all
yeah this is just kind of the tip end of my ODEs studying for now
my last topic was like
structural stability, borderline sketches and volterras equation
volterra is fun
idk what borderline sketches is
structural stability sounds like bifn lol
its just a change in the quantity or stability of stationary points along variation of a parameter
yeah
I don't
ah 
sorry
I haven't been around here long
ah
he had a PhD and got banned?
avidrunner?
ah, resolute i think is the word im looking for
resolute describes avid pretty well
i have no idea lol
he has really strong opinions on authors too
thatd be my guess
sorry did i totally distract you

It's fine, I should do some work but I enjoy talking too
I don't really have any work to do
since I'm not in school
lol
im up playing a game of see if i can not get entangled in a help channel while my sleeping pills kick in
that's a dangerous game
idk what it is about this server that makes me stay awake hours past when I should be helping random people with random things
but it happens often
:/
the nice thing for me is right now I actually think that I want to become a professor
so that's like the 1 job I could get when I am done anyways
Are you going to go to graduate school?
idk that i can afford it
i only got accepted into a non thesis
i feel salty about taking out so much in loans
at the same time im scared about entering the job market
are you in the US?
yea
what is a non thesis?
like, you pay
you dont do research under a professor
you just take another year of more specialized classes
its half a degree for suckers
If you don't mind me asking, how many programs did you apply to?
one 
dang
life on rails
if you want to feel better, I have a question about my question that you probably know how to do
So, I did the jacobian stuff
at (0,0) I get tr=1 det=-2 so a saddle
at (2,0) I get tr=-1 det=-2 so a saddle
but
at (1, 1) I get tr=-1 and det=1
and I'm not sure if this is a nodal source or spiral source
Idk how to use the poincare map like with non obvious points
how would I find out which it is?
usually youd use the line
well its not a line
theres a parabola crossing through the upper half
what would the parabola be in my case
it's det=tr^2/4
but
1=1/4 doesn't make a parabola
so I must be missing something
damn lets see if my sleeping pilled brain can do this in my head 
yyea
so in order for these to be equal
what x would have to be a lot smaller?
holding y the same, youd have to decrease x a lot to get to 1/4
which is the parabola
wait I'm not understanding
for what to be equal?
Im just trying to figure where we are in relation to the parabola
say right now we have x=1/4 y^2
this parabola
sitting somewhere in relation to us
oh, well at tr=-1 the parabola has point (-1, 1/4)
and our point is (-1, 1) which is higher
our 'equation' right now looks like 1=1/4
at (1,1)?
(-1, 1)
for trace = -1 det = 1
but it is the point (1, 1)
x= 1 y = 1
if you get what I'm saying
yah so our trace is -1, our det is 1
if our parabola is y=x^2/4
(-1, 1) is above the parabola
to the left of the y-axis
so I'd conclude that we have a spiral sink
do you approve?
i dont think so
but im sleeping pilled
to me i think (-1, 1) is a point on y=x^2 right
so the 1/4 only flattens it?
then our point should be on the inside
between the parabola and the axis
yeah that's what I said

Goodnight!

thanks for your help
$\bar{x}=(2-x-y)x$ $\newline$ $\bar{y}=(x-1)y$ $\newline$ this system has critical points (0, 0) (1, 1) (2, 0). When I linearize at each of these points I get the jacobian matrix evaluated at each point to be (in order as listed before) $\newline$ $\begin{bmatrix} 2 & 0 \ 0 & -1 \end{bmatrix} , \begin{bmatrix} -1 & -1 \ 1 & 0 \end{bmatrix} , \begin{bmatrix} -2 & -2 \ 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}$ $\newline$ these have in order (trace, determinant) being $\newline$ $(1, -2) , (-1, 1) , (-1, -2)$ $\newline$ So, I conclude that in order the critical points have these trajectories near them: saddle, spiral sink, saddle. $\newline$ $\newline$ Can anyone verify?
AustinU
i cant recall if this version has all the features
the full one is in matlab
but this will find fixed point and classify stability
da mnit
XD
thank you
do I want the direction field or phase plane one?
Sorry to dissapoint Jan but I can't figure out how to download/use that
So this is my question if anyone sees ^^
@fathom flicker Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @fathom flicker
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Need help here
you know what the volume should be
we need to solve for y but we can’t use this equation for it
so what other physical property of the box can we make an equation for?
@hollow sonnet Has your question been resolved?
My apologies. We could do area?
Area of the square portion
we can do the surface area of the whole box
that’s the area for the bottom portion, so what’s the area of the side portion?
A = X * y
Is this right?^
that’s correct for 1 side portion. How many of those are there on the box?
so if we add the area of the bottom and the 4 sides we get the total area of the box
yes
Ok
note how our constraint is the total cost
Yes
which is a function of the bottom and side areas
Right
so let’s express the total cost in terms of the area formulas we already have
we need to multiply the areas by their respective cost per square foot
now that we have an equation we can use it to solve for one of the variables
Is that right?
in terms of the other variable
Is that it?
look at how you solved for y again
yes
Ok so fundamentals are fine but the math isn’t right
just redo the algebra and you’ll be good to go
Ok and the 160 is in the right spot correct?
not sure what you mean by ‘right spot’
In for A
160 isn't really area, it's cost
once you multiplied by the cost of each portion of the area it's a cost equation
but it is on the correct side of the equation
Closed by @hollow sonnet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So uh I just took my eyes off of the screen for a second and see this? The lesson is about quadratics
sounds like they were finding the eq of a quadratic going through 3 known points by means of a linear system
but like
what is that
computational work for gaussian elimination
in principle if you know how to solve linear systems then gaussian elimination will end up not much more than a change of notation
as in ive never heard or seen of gaussian elimination or that bracket notation before
those would be matrices
Closed by @sage dagger
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I go about beginning to solve this?
I know that the tangent line equation is the differential of the curve equation
feel free
So y' is the tangent to the curve y= ax²
I believe so
ohhhh because they touch at x = -3
What?
I think I found the solution
because it's tangent to the curve
Well after forming that equation
You can just input -3
Then find the rest
I hope?
Try it and let me know
That's not correct
what's not correct
The tangent and the curve share a point
That point can be found making an equation with both the curve and the tangent
In x = -3
$-2(-3) + a(-3)^2 = b$
Rub05
this is what I hve so far
You can see this here
I wanted to do this algebraically and use graphing to check after
but thank you
so I have -6a + 6 = b
how do I determine a or b from that equation
do I use a past equation that equals a or b?
That's not the answer, I put another function in desmos just for proving by graphing what I said before
9a + 6 = b
I didn't say it was the answer, I was just saying I wanted to use graphing in general post-answering the question
2 * -3 = -6, not 9
(-3)² = 9
Not yet
This is just the curve and the tangent, there is not y' anywhere yet
Just two function sharing a point
ok I see
Having a and b here, we can know the point that's shared
And having that equation written is the first part of the excercise
ok
In the second part, you have to use y' now
But first
Do you know how to find the slope of a tangent?
False
how come
$$-2x + y = b$$
$$ +2x -2x + y = b + 2x$$
$$y = b + 2x$$
Rub05
y = 2x + b
You put -b instead of b
+b
Oh, I didn't see that sorry
ur good
Now, do you know how to find the slope of any function at any point?
But what about the curve?
You cannot do that with the curve
finding the slope of the tangent line of the function, or any function period?
so I differentiate y = 2x + b?
Why do you want to differentiate the tangent if you know how to find its slope just seeing its equation?
or do I differentiate y = ax^2?
That one
m being the slope, m = 2a
m being the slope of the curve ohhhhh
We know that the tangent and the curve share a point, we have the equation to find that point.
The tangent has the same slope as the curve in that point, so the second equation is...
2ax = 2x + b?
No
because they share a point, so they are equal at that point?
You are saying "The slope of the curve = The equation of the tangent"
Yes, but that's the first equation we made before
"Curve equation = Tangent equation" in x = -3
a(-3)^2 = 2(-3) + b
9a + 6 = b
yes
And know, you have to do "Curve slope = Tangent slope" in x = -3
2 = 2a(-3)
2 = -6a
-1/3 = a
Yes
9(-1/3) + 6 = B
-3 + 6 = b
3 = b
Yes!
ohh my god that was so much simpler than I initially did it
thank you for helping me
are there any tips for future problems like this one?
If you have parameters to find, think always about making equations
Closed by @spiral wraith
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can anyone solve this problem
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
there isn't much more to the problem than the hints that have been provided
have you made any progress so far?
or are you stuck on any particular step?
@fallow kindle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how can i check if my solution is valid in lu decomposition?
@earnest shell Has your question been resolved?
@earnest shell Has your question been resolved?
@earnest shell Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I just bought lottery ticket. 7 numbers I picked, out of 36 possible numbers, same number can't be picked twice.
I thought that calculation for chance to win 7 correct numbers would be 36x35x34x33x32x31x30, because after each pick of a number that is one less number to choose from. This yields a chance of 1/42,072,307,200 according to calculator.
However according to our Lottery authority I bought it with the chance for 7 correct numbers should be 1/8,347,680.
So what am I doing wrong?
@terse sparrow Has your question been resolved?
The same cases are repeated here several times
It contains the different permutation of those 7 numbers which is supposed to be as just one way
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can you explain it how that works?
Yeah
Consider instead of 7 there are two correct numbers
Let the numbers be 3 and 4
So in your case you consider 1) picking up 3 and then picking up 4 , 2) picking up 4 and then picking up 3 ; as different actions
Hence you are counting then twice
While they need to be counted as one way
Same goes if we are picking three numbers
If we are picking 1,2,3 then there are 3!=6 arrangements to this
123
132
213
231
312
321
But all these arrangements are denoting same action
So we divide the ways by 3!
For your question we can get total number of ways by 36×35×34×33×32×31×30/7! , dividing by 7! So the different arrangements of those same seven numbers are considered as one
,w 42072307200/7!
This is what you had in denominator of the actual answer
We are just choosing seven numbers and the arrangement of those choices doesn't matter
@terse sparrow Has your question been resolved?
Oh of course, the order doesn't matter, that's what I did wrong. If the order mattered there would be 42072307200 different outcomes, but since the order doesn't matter many of the outcomes are considered the same.
But what does 7! mean? The ! what is that
7×6×5×4×3×2×1
n! = n×(n-1)×(n-2)×...×3×2×1
Factorial we call it
Cool, I understand. Thanks much 🙂

/done
Not done
Closed by @jolly ginkgo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is it true that if ab=ba then atbt = btat?
a and b are matrices of course
$A^TB^T=B^TA^T$, right?
Toby
the t are transposes?
yeah
take transposes of both sides of AB=BA
oh, right, $(AB)^t=(BA)t-> B^TA^T=A^tB^T$
marchello
Closed by @vale dirge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
a
?_?
do you have a question?
@strong oxide Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help
how i can determine f(x) or g(x)?
wdym
How do I know if one curve is greater than the other?
graphing helps
rule of thumb is graph it and it's top function - bottom function
last part can help me?
i don't understand, what do you need help with?
I need to know what is f(x) and g(x)
I don't know if what I did is correct, so far it's working for me
graphing helps
you wrote them, they are sqrt(4x) and 16x^2
this part
@high lily can you solve bottom function - top function and just take absolute value in the end?
yes
well then @north anchor just take whatever function you want and do that. No need to try and find whichever is on top
| f(x) - g(x) | = | g(x) - f(x) |
need to be careful and ensure that one is always greater or equal to the other
graphing helps
don't skimp
fatneek
idk how graph function
then go back and review
its something you should know
and one of the prerequisites before even starting any calculus
how the heck are you expecting to do stuff like analyse behaviour of function of you don't have a basic idea of how to graph them
the upper function is f(x) and the lower one is g(x)?
are you implying you don't know how to graph stuff like
y = x^2?
yes is like a u
and what's stopping you from graphing
y = 16x^2
that's a property of the abs val
|k| = |-k|
don't worry too much about that
idk
try it
same idea with
y = sqrt(4x)
to find that, f(x) is the upper curve and g(x) lower?
But in case both functions are the same, what do I do?
wdym the same
they are clearly different functions
having a visual representation of the problem as evident in the sketch they have
gives a clear indication of which function is greater
and when doing the problem yourself you should make a sketch/diagram just like they have
how can determine f(x) and g(x) in this
and observe in the interval which graph is above the other
what interval
yo evaluate both function?
wdym
[-1,1] can use 0.1 to evaluate
interval
still doesn't explain where 0.1 is coming from
of the range of the interval
like you said [-1,1]
that's the interval
0.1 is in that interval, but doesn't tell me why you're using it and you're expecting to get from that
I hope to see when evaluating it that they tell me who is the oldest or the youngest
why are you so insistent on NOT graphing
if you insist on doing it purely algebraically, there are nice values to use
it is graphed
if its graphed already
then you should be able to clearly see from the graph which function is greater
no need to do additional tests
I can't see it, both functions have the same address
can you not clearly see from that that the purple is above the brown (except at the intersection points)
or that the purple is above the green
i see it thx
@north anchor Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @north anchor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
could be a mental lapse thing, but could someone help me with this
My question:
a number when divided by 7 gives 4 as remainder and when divided by 3 gives 2 as remainder. Find the possible values of the number.
My answer:
n_1 = 7q + 4
n_2 = 3q + 2
I know i could list out a bunch of numbers where q takes any integral values and see the common points
But is there a way for me to get the entire family of solutions so that i can instantly find instances where n_1 = n_2
this is the chinese remainder theorem
@timid silo Has your question been resolved?
?
Mhm, what about it?
it's the euclidean division algorithm i presume
no that's something else (although of course related)
the chinese remainder theorem first tells you that there are solutions to these types of equations (provided the numbers you divide by are coprime) and gives you an algorithm to calculate the solution (which is unique up to the lcm of the numbers)
btw dont ignore the bot
ahh interesting
it'd given me the entire family of solutions?
how do i even know the two numbers are coprime though
if you asked the same question but with eg 8 and 6 instead of 7 and 3 then you might not find solutions
"might not" meaning it's more of an undefined behavior thing?
Also just to confirm the way i setup the equation is fine using division algorithm right?
or was i supposed to use different variables for q
for some reason they used a different variable in one of the solutions but i never saw the need to do so
"might not" means that sometimes there are solutions and sometimes there are not. depending on which remainders you want
yes you should have used different variables for the q
n_1 = 7q+4
and n_1 = 3k + 2
here one solution is obviously 11
11 = 7*1 + 4
and 11 = 3*3 + 2
q and k are different
right i bruteforced it and i did get 11 and 47
i could keep going but i was just curious about a generalized method
47 = 5 mod 7
wait i must be bugging but why is the q variable different?
isn't q integers?
in both cases
Lol are they not? I'm confused wym
is 1=3?
No
So basically you define q differently because they have to be yield the same value (n_1)?
Yeah i get that you use different values of q to get n_1 in both cases cuz ofc you require different linear combinations to get the same value
i was confused why my definition would be wrong then
I'm using the logic that q is same in both instances so i take the same integer
but ofc in the process the n_1 and n_2 would be different
no?
I guess it doesn't make practical sense for me to define it the way i did (?)
well but that's not what you want
okay yeah brain's just foggy now lol you just want instances where n_1 is equal in both cases therefore q has to change
also just to clarify for the generalized remainder theorem: a = bq + r
0<= r< b and a,b, and q are integers would be the only conditions?
so the general theorem is that given integers a and b there exist unique integers q,r with a=bq+r and 0<=r<b
which you prove with eg euclidean algorithm
okay sure i guess that clarifies it
any reason why they use the word "unique integers" and not just "integers"?
or is that supposed to signify the shifting nature of q (taking any integer values)
well in general there will be lots of options to write a like that. 7 = 3*2+1 = 3*1 + 4 = 3*15 + (-38) = ...
but the condition 0<=r<b actually makes this unique so that you only get one solution
wait i got the first line but this has me a little confused
one solution of what? could you give an example
of writing it in that form with 0<=r<b
there is only the one way to write 7 = 3*2+1 with remainder r=1 satisfying 0<=1<3
there is no other option
which is trivial for small numbers but not so obvious for big numbers
you can't write 7 = 3*some integer + (some number between 0 and 3) in some different way other than 7=3*2+1
ah you mean given a and b are integers and r is in the range right?
okay so it depends on r then
isn't that just algebra or am i missing something
7 = 3*(some integer) + (take any integer from (0,3)) then find the "some integer"?
i think i'm probably missing the intricacy lol
also could we go to the chinese remainder theorem part now?
its not obvious that there is a unique solution to this


