#help-10

1 messages · Page 171 of 1

edgy grove
#

Yup what is your doubt ma'am?

scenic fjord
#

I wanna know why lamda is equal to cp

#

Like which parts tell us it’s equal to cp

edgy grove
#

Actually i will say something useful for advanced concepts like this try and use the specific topic channel as you might get answer faster

edgy grove
scenic fjord
edgy grove
scenic fjord
#

But this is under PDEs

edgy grove
#

Can you say full form of pde

scenic fjord
#

Partial differential equations

edgy grove
#

Yup then try

scenic fjord
edgy grove
#

Umm i don't want to read the theory you sent can you please summarise it for me

#

I can understand wave parts

#

And also pde

#

But then why are we finding wavelength

scenic fjord
edgy grove
#

And what is c and p

scenic fjord
#

That’s why I’m blur

scenic fjord
edgy grove
#

Wave in heat?

#

Ok just say what c and p is

scenic fjord
#

This is found from the mathematical methods shown in textbook

edgy grove
#

Ok i understood

#

Umm here you are asking where pi/l came from?

scenic fjord
#

I’m asking why lamda is equal to cp

#

I don’t know where this comes from

edgy grove
#

Umm can you just highlight the place where cp is mentioned in sinosodul equation

scenic fjord
#

So why lamda is equal to cp?

edgy grove
#

There is a seperate chanel for pde and ode

#

Wow

#

Oh ok @scenic fjord

#

I will send a pic of what they are speaking

scenic fjord
#

Huh? I just want to know why lamda is equal to cp

edgy grove
#

Just one question ma'am can you pls say what that p is

#

Is it the time period

#

Or frequency

scenic fjord
#

I already put in the red box

edgy grove
#

Ma'am i can only see p there

#

I can't see what p means

scenic fjord
#

P is obtained from previous solution

#

Just sub it

edgy grove
#

Hmm

#

Ok Lemme check

scenic fjord
#

The point now is, I wanna know why lamda is equal to cp

#

After I know this, I can proceed with the textbook workings

edgy grove
#

Oh i understood finally

#

It is the coefficient of x

scenic fjord
#

Anyway, I just see again and I know why lamda is cp

edgy grove
#

I mean coefficient of wavelength

#

Umm can you understand?

scenic fjord
#

Erm

edgy grove
#

I will explain why p is npi/l

scenic fjord
#

This is wave in physics right ?

edgy grove
#

And why c is speed

#

Yup

scenic fjord
#

I learnt this before and well, I mislook wave equation to heat equation

#

Anyway, actually I have no idea why we need to solve like this

edgy grove
scenic fjord
edgy grove
#

Actually why are you studying Fourier series

#

?

scenic fjord
#

The normal solving method with waves I already learnt

scenic fjord
edgy grove
#

I learnt both on physics

#

Sooo idk why it comes on maths

scenic fjord
#

Hmm, I learnt wave in y1 without knowing fourier series

scenic fjord
edgy grove
#

Ma'am can i DM and can you explain why we use Fourier series in wave ?

scenic fjord
#

Bye and thank you

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @scenic fjord

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

north anchor
#

help with this

obtuse pebbleBOT
north anchor
#

how i can calculate the intervals a and b

native inlet
#

you mean -1 and 1?

north anchor
#

yes

#

how you know if a and b

native inlet
#

find where f(x)=g(x) is what I would do, but there might be a better way

north anchor
north anchor
#

someone

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@north anchor Has your question been resolved?

distant cairn
#

khm

#

idk but it seems like about solving quadratic equation to get a and b

#

graphs are intersecting so... x^4 -4x^2+1=x^2-3 => x^4 - 5x^2 +4 =0

#

On Viet 1 and 4 are roots for x^2

#

that's about all

distant cairn
north anchor
#

how you know if a or b

distant cairn
#

the area is calculated under curve

#

here between one curve over Ox and anouther negative curve under Ox

north anchor
#

gpt chat told me that to know if a function is superior or inferior, you had to evaluate both functions by the interval

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@north anchor Has your question been resolved?

left hornet
# north anchor how i can calculate the intervals a and b

If it's hard for you to find the intervals a and b by finding the roots of a degree-4 equation, you can call x^2 a variable like t, and solve for t like a normal degree-2 equation
Now that you have t, you can find x by calculating the square root of t

north anchor
left hornet
#

You did it, and got something else?

north anchor
left hornet
#

So why did you say "I know"?

#

and my advice is, try to understand it

#

What part of it is unclear?

north anchor
left hornet
#

These two, the only other-roots of the equation, are out of the interval that you want

north anchor
#

The largest number is b nd the smallest number is a?

left hornet
north anchor
#

yes a is negative , -1 and b is 1

left hornet
#

In the set of the common values of the area of the first equation and the second equation, yes

left hornet
#

By changing what object?

north anchor
#

a must be less than b and b must be greater than a

left hornet
#

integral f from a to b = -1 * integral f from b to a

north anchor
#

yes

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@north anchor Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

silver plover
obtuse pebbleBOT
silver plover
#

could someone explain plz how they drew that graph on the uv axis

#

like i dont get what they based that on

#

the sketch

haughty coyote
#

R is the region represented by that rectangle on the u-v basis of R^2

silver plover
#

it doesnt look it

#

from the xy plane

haughty coyote
#

v goes from 0 to 3 by definition of R

#

"2x-y = 0 to 2x-y=3"

silver plover
#

sorry im still confused on how these two regions r the same

haughty coyote
#

Change of basis

#

It's linear algebra

#

Of course they're not the same geometrically

#

But they describe the same region of R^2

haughty coyote
# silver plover

And with all the jacobian stuff you can see how the integral is transferred from one basis to the other

fierce lagoon
#

You take one region from one "paper" and you "re-map" it onto a different "paper"

#

That's how I think of Jacobians

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@silver plover Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @silver plover

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

exotic nebula
#

.

obtuse pebbleBOT
fathom flicker
#

surely it would be easy to substitute it in and try

#

if y=-7e^(2x)

#

find y'

#

and then find y''

#

plug all of those in

#

is it equal to 0?

#

if so, true. If not, false

exotic nebula
#

lemme pull up my calculator

#

d/dx is -14e^(2x)

fathom flicker
#

dy/dx

exotic nebula
#

missed a letter but yeah

#

y''=-28e^(2x)

#

how do i solve the DE after plugging it all in

#

i plugged it in, i'm just not sure what to do now

brisk matrix
#

simplify

#

if the left hand side is equal to the right hand side, then that is a solution

exotic nebula
#

Oh ok gotcha

#

so it's not equal

#

so false

brisk matrix
#

then it’s not a solution

exotic nebula
#

yep

#

what about this one?

#

This one can be done using separation i'm pretty sure

#

Just by looking at it, it's probably false. But how would I show that?

brisk matrix
#

plug it in again

exotic nebula
#

I got y=e^(x+((x^2)/2)))

brisk matrix
#

you don’t need to solve the ode

exotic nebula
#

oh

brisk matrix
#

you can just plug in the y

exotic nebula
#

ohhh

#

I got some weird number

#

like you mean plug in y for y'?

brisk matrix
#

x^2e^x for y

#

and then the derivative of that for y’

exotic nebula
#

yeah thats what i mean

#

oh ok

#

y'=2xe^(x)+4x^(2)e^(x)+x^(3)e^(x)

brisk matrix
#

where did that come from

exotic nebula
#

finding the derivative of y=(x^(2)e^(x))(1+x)

brisk matrix
#

that’s not y

#

y is x^2e^x

exotic nebula
#

Oh i did the whole thing, not just y

#

ok y' is 2xe^(x)+x^(2)e^(x)

brisk matrix
#

then plug them into the equation, and see if the lhs = rhs

exotic nebula
#

It does

#

it's true

brisk matrix
#

it does?

exotic nebula
#

Yes?

#

Does it not?

brisk matrix
#

can i see your work?

exotic nebula
#

Oh i see where i went wrong

#

Yeah it's false too

#

Not sure about this one

#

nevermind i got it

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@exotic nebula Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @exotic nebula

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

tight pike
#

I have two lines y=-300r+9000 (IS) and y= 20r + 1500. (LM) My problem asks which policy (fiscal or monetary) will be most effective. Based on our notes it says that depending on which slope is steeper will decide which policy is better. Here I thought the first slope was steeper but according to my prof. and everyone else it's not, so I'm confused about how the first slope isn't steeper.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@tight pike Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@tight pike Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @tight pike

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

foggy pumice
#

I am working on a problem similar to f(x,y)=xye^x^2 D=[-2,2]x[-2,2]
I have a question asking me to do the following :⦁ Find the absolute maxima and minimum by evaluation f on the boundary of D
what does that mean

rigid pine
#

The boundary of the domain is made up of four line segments, for example, along the straight line connecting (-2,-2) and (-2, 2). Consider the function (on this line segment) f(-2, -2) = 4e^4, -2 <= y <= 2.

foggy pumice
#

While I appreciate the rewording, I still don't know what that is asking me to do

rigid pine
#

I wouldn't describe it as a rewording.

foggy pumice
#

ok i agree with you

rigid pine
#

You are trying to apply this theorem. If the extrema occur within the boundary (not on it) they will occur at the critical points. But they may exist on the boundary curve. You effectively need to consider four functions as suggested above to be able to determine the absolute maxima and minima.

#

Note. For clarity hypothesis 2 means some f(a, b) inside the boundary is higher than f(x, y) along the whole of the boundary. It might be clear but I, for some reason, got confused by it. Of course, a analogous theorem exists for minima.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@foggy pumice Has your question been resolved?

foggy pumice
#

ok so ive read this 15 times now. how would I apply this? theres a lot of symbols here I have never seen before

#

whats the name of this theorem maybe? that way I could look it up to see its application?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@foggy pumice Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@foggy pumice Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @foggy pumice

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

fathom flicker
#

I am trying to find all the critical points of $\newline$ $\dot{x}=(2-x-y)x$ $\newline$ $\dot{y}=(x-1)y$

warm shaleBOT
#

AustinU

fathom flicker
#

I think that they are, (0, 0), (1, 1), and (2, 0)

#

Could anyone confirm, or point out if I am missing something?

gilded needle
#

what does the dot notation mean?

warm shaleBOT
#

AustinU

forest sinew
#

physics derivative

fathom flicker
#

it means derivative

gilded needle
#

isn't that with respect to some other variable?

#

like time

fathom flicker
#

yes

#

this system is a system x(t) and y(t)

gilded needle
#

got it, thx

forest sinew
#

you can use ZFT right

#

youll get two lines from each

fathom flicker
#

I don't know what ZFT is

forest sinew
#

zero factor theorem

#

in the x null cline, (2-x-y)=0 or x=0

fathom flicker
#

Would you mind elaborating?

#

right

forest sinew
#

so two lines

fathom flicker
#

so either x=0, or 2=x+y

forest sinew
#

yea

#

intercepts (2,0) and (0,2)

#

and also the yaxis

#

do the same for the y nullcline

fathom flicker
#

if x=0, the only critical point that comes from that is if y=0

#

so (0, 0)

#

if 2=x+y

forest sinew
#

doing too much casework i think

fathom flicker
#

we can get one with y=0 x=2

#

or with y=1 x=1

forest sinew
#

just extract the lines

#

well you do you i guess

fathom flicker
#

how would I do it with the lines instead?

forest sinew
#

you have two lines so far

fathom flicker
#

sorry if I brushed over that

forest sinew
#

one is the line connecting (2,0) and (0,2)

#

and the entire y-axis

#

then from the y nullcline, you get either y=0, or x=1

#

so you have the origin as stationary

#

then, the line connecting (2,0) and (0,2) crosses the y=0 line

#

then, the x=1 line crosses the line connecting (2,0) and (0,2)

#

3 stationary points

#

i think?

#

you may need to graph

#

here

#

anywhere a blue line crosses a green line is stationary

#

since it produces a zero factor in each equation

#

but you could just as easily create this plot by hand too

fathom flicker
#

oh that is cool, I didn't ever see that you could do it that way before

forest sinew
#

usually they arent nice lines lol

fathom flicker
#

produces the same three points (0,0), (1,1), and (2,0) that I got

forest sinew
#

yea

#

oftentimes you have to do this for ilke

#

grossly nonlinear messy things

fathom flicker
#

Okay cool that is good to know

#

thank you jan

forest sinew
fathom flicker
#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @fathom flicker

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

fathom flicker
#

I'm reclaiming this from the same question as above

fathom flicker
#

So I found the critical points of the system

#

I found them to be: (0,0) (1, 1) (2,0)

#

and now I want to linearize the system near these critical points

#

Starting with the (0, 0) critical point

forest sinew
#

what class is this

fathom flicker
#

could I just linearize it as x'=0 y'=0

fathom flicker
forest sinew
#

so im gonna bastardize is

#

isnt the linearization like

#

youll take the partial of xdot wrt x

fathom flicker
#

ohhhh

#

right

forest sinew
#

wel li can write it

fathom flicker
#

I forgot about that

#

you do the Jacobian

forest sinew
#

yea

#

then you evaluate it

#

you wind up with a 2x2 matrix

#

you use the poincare diagram

#

to make your life easy

fathom flicker
#

poincare diagram?

forest sinew
fathom flicker
#

One second, I am going to look at my notes on the jacobian and see if I can't figure out how to linearize near the critical points

forest sinew
#

classification of 2x2 linear systems

fathom flicker
#

oh I know that

#

determinant trace plan

forest sinew
#

yea happy

fathom flicker
#

didn't know it was called poincare diagram

#

another good thing to know

#

lol

forest sinew
#

there are cooler things also called poincare diagrams

#

there are cooler things also called poincare diagrams

#

poincare maps

fathom flicker
#

I saw someone in diffeq channel earlier with one of those I think

#

something about it being a cross section model of a system in higher than 3D right?

forest sinew
#

im not that smart yet

fathom flicker
#

what are you taking right now?

forest sinew
#

last semester classes

#

about to graduate

fathom flicker
#

that's awesome!

#

math major?

forest sinew
#

i just took a handful of grad ODE classes so i know a tiny bit

#

yea

fathom flicker
#

lol

#

well congrats that is super cool

forest sinew
#

eh u forget most of it

#

ah u mean terrifyign

fathom flicker
#

What was your favorite part / favorite class?

#

or least favorite

#

if you particularly disliked it

#

XD

forest sinew
#

i hated analysis

#

i like making graphics

#

so all the classes i got to make cool animations for

#

dynamics was a big one

#

also math biology

#

and neuroscience

#

made this one but i dont think we will use it bearlain

#

for my last class

fathom flicker
#

does that one have a short explanation or is it too above my grasp probably

#

what's it mean?

forest sinew
#

its a slowed down bird song, we are like

#

summing up the frequencies that are present in a way

#

i cant really explain it either happy

fathom flicker
#

aha no worries. Still cool

#

one second I am going to try to do the problem I started this with

forest sinew
#

its using a bunch of FFT's to pluck out the dominant frequencies

fathom flicker
#

then I'll be back

fathom flicker
forest sinew
#

i made it run on every 100 or so samples of the audio so you can see the dominant frequencies appear alongside when you hear them

#

theyre distinct enough in this recording, not all layered

fathom flicker
#

is that also about the bird songs?

forest sinew
#

nah this is bifurcation stuff

#

u just got me going through old gifs

#

lol

fathom flicker
#

lol

#

yeah I wish I could understand more

#

but I haven't started school yet

forest sinew
#

you must be on bifurcations

#

o wow

#

not even a freshman?

fathom flicker
#

I'll be a freshman next year

#

in college

#

if that's what you mean

forest sinew
#

you should take a peak at bifurcation stuff

#

if you havent yet

fathom flicker
#

what topic is that

forest sinew
#

youre in 2d nonlinear systems

fathom flicker
#

or is it just bifurcation

forest sinew
#

ODEs

#

its dynamical systems

#

you are already looking at more interesting 2d systems apparently

#

you could look at like hopf

#

or study the 1d ones

#

theyre just cool is all

fathom flicker
#

yeah this is just kind of the tip end of my ODEs studying for now

#

my last topic was like

#

structural stability, borderline sketches and volterras equation

forest sinew
#

volterra is fun

#

idk what borderline sketches is

#

structural stability sounds like bifn lol

fathom flicker
#

I think that it is

#

I googled bifurcation

#

lol

forest sinew
#

its just a change in the quantity or stability of stationary points along variation of a parameter

fathom flicker
#

yeah

forest sinew
#

if you remember grist

#

who got banned

fathom flicker
#

I don't

forest sinew
#

ah bearlain

fathom flicker
#

sorry

forest sinew
#

he studies them in neurological models IIRC

#

for his PHD

fathom flicker
#

I haven't been around here long

forest sinew
#

ah

fathom flicker
#

he had a PhD and got banned?

forest sinew
#

he is persnickity

#

not stubborn

#

idk the word

fathom flicker
#

I feel like a lot of people are here

#

avid....

#

lol

forest sinew
#

avidrunner?

fathom flicker
#

yes

#

is 'persnickity'

#

I'd say

forest sinew
#

ah, resolute i think is the word im looking for

#

resolute describes avid pretty well

fathom flicker
#

true

#

How did that get him banned?

forest sinew
#

i have no idea lol

#

he has really strong opinions on authors too

#

thatd be my guess

#

sorry did i totally distract you

fathom flicker
#

It's fine, I should do some work but I enjoy talking too

#

I don't really have any work to do

#

since I'm not in school

#

lol

forest sinew
#

im up playing a game of see if i can not get entangled in a help channel while my sleeping pills kick in

fathom flicker
#

that's a dangerous game

#

idk what it is about this server that makes me stay awake hours past when I should be helping random people with random things

#

but it happens often

forest sinew
#

i usually feel like i know nothing

#

its nice to know something

#

wish it paid

fathom flicker
#

:/

#

the nice thing for me is right now I actually think that I want to become a professor

#

so that's like the 1 job I could get when I am done anyways

#

Are you going to go to graduate school?

forest sinew
#

idk that i can afford it

#

i only got accepted into a non thesis

#

i feel salty about taking out so much in loans

#

at the same time im scared about entering the job market

fathom flicker
#

are you in the US?

forest sinew
#

yea

fathom flicker
#

what is a non thesis?

forest sinew
#

like, you pay

#

you dont do research under a professor

#

you just take another year of more specialized classes

#

its half a degree for suckers

fathom flicker
#

If you don't mind me asking, how many programs did you apply to?

forest sinew
#

one KEK

fathom flicker
#

dang

forest sinew
#

life on rails

fathom flicker
#

if you want to feel better, I have a question about my question that you probably know how to do

fathom flicker
#

So, I did the jacobian stuff

#

at (0,0) I get tr=1 det=-2 so a saddle

#

at (2,0) I get tr=-1 det=-2 so a saddle

#

but

#

at (1, 1) I get tr=-1 and det=1

#

and I'm not sure if this is a nodal source or spiral source

#

Idk how to use the poincare map like with non obvious points

#

how would I find out which it is?

forest sinew
#

usually youd use the line

#

well its not a line

#

theres a parabola crossing through the upper half

fathom flicker
#

what would the parabola be in my case

#

it's det=tr^2/4

#

but

#

1=1/4 doesn't make a parabola

#

so I must be missing something

forest sinew
#

damn lets see if my sleeping pilled brain can do this in my head thonk

fathom flicker
#

do I just add a y and an x to that

#

y=x^2 / 4

forest sinew
#

yyea

#

so in order for these to be equal

#

what x would have to be a lot smaller?

#

holding y the same, youd have to decrease x a lot to get to 1/4

#

which is the parabola

fathom flicker
#

wait I'm not understanding

fathom flicker
forest sinew
#

Im just trying to figure where we are in relation to the parabola

#

say right now we have x=1/4 y^2

#

this parabola

#

sitting somewhere in relation to us

fathom flicker
#

oh, well at tr=-1 the parabola has point (-1, 1/4)
and our point is (-1, 1) which is higher

forest sinew
#

our 'equation' right now looks like 1=1/4

fathom flicker
#

so we have a spiral sink

#

I think

forest sinew
#

at (1,1)?

fathom flicker
#

(-1, 1)

#

for trace = -1 det = 1

#

but it is the point (1, 1)

#

x= 1 y = 1

#

if you get what I'm saying

forest sinew
#

oh i get what you mean

#

damn my sleeping pills are kicking in hard flonshed

fathom flicker
#

yah so our trace is -1, our det is 1

#

if our parabola is y=x^2/4

#

(-1, 1) is above the parabola

#

to the left of the y-axis

#

so I'd conclude that we have a spiral sink

#

do you approve?

forest sinew
#

i dont think so

#

but im sleeping pilled

#

to me i think (-1, 1) is a point on y=x^2 right

#

so the 1/4 only flattens it?

#

then our point should be on the inside

#

between the parabola and the axis

fathom flicker
#

yeah that's what I said

forest sinew
#

oh, are we saying the same thing flonshed

fathom flicker
forest sinew
#

okay

#

i gotta go to bed

#

good luck with your study

fathom flicker
#

Goodnight!

forest sinew
fathom flicker
#

thanks for your help

#

$\bar{x}=(2-x-y)x$ $\newline$ $\bar{y}=(x-1)y$ $\newline$ this system has critical points (0, 0) (1, 1) (2, 0). When I linearize at each of these points I get the jacobian matrix evaluated at each point to be (in order as listed before) $\newline$ $\begin{bmatrix} 2 & 0 \ 0 & -1 \end{bmatrix} , \begin{bmatrix} -1 & -1 \ 1 & 0 \end{bmatrix} , \begin{bmatrix} -2 & -2 \ 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}$ $\newline$ these have in order (trace, determinant) being $\newline$ $(1, -2) , (-1, 1) , (-1, -2)$ $\newline$ So, I conclude that in order the critical points have these trajectories near them: saddle, spiral sink, saddle. $\newline$ $\newline$ Can anyone verify?

warm shaleBOT
#

AustinU

forest sinew
#

i cant recall if this version has all the features

#

the full one is in matlab

#

but this will find fixed point and classify stability

forest sinew
#

da mnit

fathom flicker
#

XD

#

thank you

#

do I want the direction field or phase plane one?

#

Sorry to dissapoint Jan but I can't figure out how to download/use that

#

So this is my question if anyone sees ^^

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@fathom flicker Has your question been resolved?

fathom flicker
#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @fathom flicker

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

hollow sonnet
#

Need help here

obtuse pebbleBOT
hollow sonnet
#

So I’m thinking V = lwh

#

We’ll really V = x^2 * y

brisk matrix
#

you know what the volume should be

worn yoke
#

we need to solve for y but we can’t use this equation for it

brisk matrix
#

oh never mind

#

we don’t have a volume

worn yoke
#

so what other physical property of the box can we make an equation for?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@hollow sonnet Has your question been resolved?

hollow sonnet
#

Area of the square portion

worn yoke
#

we can do the surface area of the whole box

hollow sonnet
#

Ok

#

Hmmm

#

A = x^2?

worn yoke
#

that’s the area for the bottom portion, so what’s the area of the side portion?

hollow sonnet
#

A = X * y

worn yoke
#

that’s correct for 1 side portion. How many of those are there on the box?

hollow sonnet
#

4

#

Oh

#

That’s just the bottom

#

But there’s 4x y

#

For the sides

worn yoke
#

so if we add the area of the bottom and the 4 sides we get the total area of the box

hollow sonnet
#

Ok

#

So it’s A = x^2 + 4xy?

worn yoke
#

yes

hollow sonnet
#

Ok

worn yoke
#

note how our constraint is the total cost

hollow sonnet
#

Yes

worn yoke
#

which is a function of the bottom and side areas

hollow sonnet
#

Right

worn yoke
#

so let’s express the total cost in terms of the area formulas we already have

hollow sonnet
#

Ok

#

Hmmm

#

I’m not sure here, do I set 160 = x^2 + 4xy

worn yoke
#

we need to multiply the areas by their respective cost per square foot

hollow sonnet
#

Ok

#

A = 36x^2 + 10(4xy)?

worn yoke
#

now that we have an equation we can use it to solve for one of the variables

hollow sonnet
#

Is that right?

worn yoke
#

in terms of the other variable

hollow sonnet
#

Ok

#

I think I might have it

hollow sonnet
worn yoke
#

look at how you solved for y again

hollow sonnet
#

Oh whoops

#

But I solve for y and then throw it into the V equation, correct?

worn yoke
#

yes

hollow sonnet
#

Ok so fundamentals are fine but the math isn’t right

worn yoke
#

just redo the algebra and you’ll be good to go

hollow sonnet
#

Ok and the 160 is in the right spot correct?

worn yoke
#

not sure what you mean by ‘right spot’

hollow sonnet
#

In for A

worn yoke
#

160 isn't really area, it's cost

#

once you multiplied by the cost of each portion of the area it's a cost equation

#

but it is on the correct side of the equation

hollow sonnet
#

Ok thank you for your help

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @hollow sonnet

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

sage dagger
#

So uh I just took my eyes off of the screen for a second and see this? The lesson is about quadratics

sage dagger
royal basin
#

sounds like they were finding the eq of a quadratic going through 3 known points by means of a linear system

royal basin
#

computational work for gaussian elimination

sage dagger
#

what the hell

#

ok

#

never heard of it

royal basin
#

in principle if you know how to solve linear systems then gaussian elimination will end up not much more than a change of notation

sage dagger
#

as in ive never heard or seen of gaussian elimination or that bracket notation before

royal basin
#

those would be matrices

sage dagger
#

University math?

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @sage dagger

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

spiral wraith
obtuse pebbleBOT
spiral wraith
#

How do I go about beginning to solve this?

#

I know that the tangent line equation is the differential of the curve equation

woeful cove
#

I don't know how to solve it either

#

Can I still give it a go?

spiral wraith
#

feel free

woeful cove
#

So y' is the tangent to the curve y= ax²

spiral wraith
#

I believe so

woeful cove
#

y'=2ax

#

So the line -2x+y-b=0 is a tangent to y=ax² when -2x+y-b=-2ax

spiral wraith
#

ohhhh because they touch at x = -3

woeful cove
#

What?

median yacht
#

I think I found the solution

spiral wraith
#

because it's tangent to the curve

woeful cove
#

Well after forming that equation

#

You can just input -3

#

Then find the rest

#

I hope?

#

Try it and let me know

median yacht
#

That's not correct

spiral wraith
#

what's not correct

median yacht
#

The tangent and the curve share a point

#

That point can be found making an equation with both the curve and the tangent

#

In x = -3

#

$-2(-3) + a(-3)^2 = b$

warm shaleBOT
spiral wraith
#

this is what I hve so far

median yacht
median yacht
spiral wraith
#

I wanted to do this algebraically and use graphing to check after

#

but thank you

#

so I have -6a + 6 = b

#

how do I determine a or b from that equation

#

do I use a past equation that equals a or b?

median yacht
median yacht
spiral wraith
#

I didn't say it was the answer, I was just saying I wanted to use graphing in general post-answering the question

#

2 * -3 = -6, not 9

median yacht
spiral wraith
#

would we not use the y^1

#

instead of y

median yacht
#

Not yet

median yacht
# median yacht

This is just the curve and the tangent, there is not y' anywhere yet

#

Just two function sharing a point

spiral wraith
#

ok I see

median yacht
#

And having that equation written is the first part of the excercise

spiral wraith
#

ok

median yacht
#

In the second part, you have to use y' now

#

But first

#

Do you know how to find the slope of a tangent?

spiral wraith
#

it's 2 isn't it?

#

+b

median yacht
#

False

spiral wraith
#

how come

median yacht
#

$$-2x + y = b$$
$$ +2x -2x + y = b + 2x$$
$$y = b + 2x$$

warm shaleBOT
median yacht
#

y = 2x + b

spiral wraith
#

yes

#

and m, the slope, of y = mx + b

#

2 being m

median yacht
#

Correct

#

So now, we knoe that the slope of the tangent is 2

spiral wraith
#

what is false then

#

did I do something wrong

median yacht
spiral wraith
median yacht
#

Oh, I didn't see that sorry

spiral wraith
#

ur good

median yacht
#

Now, do you know how to find the slope of any function at any point?

spiral wraith
#

point-slope form?

#

y - y1 = m ( x - x1 )

median yacht
#

You cannot do that with the curve

spiral wraith
median yacht
#

No

#

Using y'

#

Now, you need to use it

spiral wraith
#

so I differentiate y = 2x + b?

median yacht
#

Why do you want to differentiate the tangent if you know how to find its slope just seeing its equation?

spiral wraith
#

or do I differentiate y = ax^2?

median yacht
#

That one

spiral wraith
#

m being the slope, m = 2a

median yacht
#

Correct

#

Wait, no

#

Not correct

#

m = 2ax = y'

spiral wraith
#

m being the slope of the curve ohhhhh

median yacht
#

We know that the tangent and the curve share a point, we have the equation to find that point.
The tangent has the same slope as the curve in that point, so the second equation is...

spiral wraith
#

2ax = 2x + b?

median yacht
#

No

spiral wraith
#

because they share a point, so they are equal at that point?

median yacht
#

You are saying "The slope of the curve = The equation of the tangent"

median yacht
median yacht
spiral wraith
#

a(-3)^2 = 2(-3) + b
9a + 6 = b
yes

median yacht
#

And know, you have to do "Curve slope = Tangent slope" in x = -3

spiral wraith
#

2 = 2a(-3)
2 = -6a
-1/3 = a

median yacht
#

Yes

spiral wraith
#

9(-1/3) + 6 = B
-3 + 6 = b
3 = b

median yacht
#

Yes!

spiral wraith
#

ohh my god that was so much simpler than I initially did it

#

thank you for helping me

#

are there any tips for future problems like this one?

median yacht
median yacht
spiral wraith
#

ok thank you

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @spiral wraith

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

fallow kindle
#

can anyone solve this problem

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

Please don't occupy multiple help channels.

stone spoke
#

there isn't much more to the problem than the hints that have been provided

#

have you made any progress so far?

#

or are you stuck on any particular step?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@fallow kindle Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

earnest shell
#

how can i check if my solution is valid in lu decomposition?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@earnest shell Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@earnest shell Has your question been resolved?

kind hawk
#

multiply it out again?

#

what are you hoping for here?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@earnest shell Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

terse sparrow
#

I just bought lottery ticket. 7 numbers I picked, out of 36 possible numbers, same number can't be picked twice.

I thought that calculation for chance to win 7 correct numbers would be 36x35x34x33x32x31x30, because after each pick of a number that is one less number to choose from. This yields a chance of 1/42,072,307,200 according to calculator.

However according to our Lottery authority I bought it with the chance for 7 correct numbers should be 1/8,347,680.

So what am I doing wrong?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@terse sparrow Has your question been resolved?

jolly ginkgo
#

It contains the different permutation of those 7 numbers which is supposed to be as just one way

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

terse sparrow
obtuse pebbleBOT
jolly ginkgo
#

Consider instead of 7 there are two correct numbers

#

Let the numbers be 3 and 4

#

So in your case you consider 1) picking up 3 and then picking up 4 , 2) picking up 4 and then picking up 3 ; as different actions

#

Hence you are counting then twice

#

While they need to be counted as one way

#

Same goes if we are picking three numbers

#

If we are picking 1,2,3 then there are 3!=6 arrangements to this
123
132
213
231
312
321
But all these arrangements are denoting same action

#

So we divide the ways by 3!

#

For your question we can get total number of ways by 36×35×34×33×32×31×30/7! , dividing by 7! So the different arrangements of those same seven numbers are considered as one

#

,w 42072307200/7!

jolly ginkgo
#

This is what you had in denominator of the actual answer

#

We are just choosing seven numbers and the arrangement of those choices doesn't matter

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@terse sparrow Has your question been resolved?

terse sparrow
#

Oh of course, the order doesn't matter, that's what I did wrong. If the order mattered there would be 42072307200 different outcomes, but since the order doesn't matter many of the outcomes are considered the same.

terse sparrow
jolly ginkgo
#

n! = n×(n-1)×(n-2)×...×3×2×1

#

Factorial we call it

terse sparrow
#

Cool, I understand. Thanks much 🙂

jolly ginkgo
terse sparrow
#

/done

jolly ginkgo
#

Not done

terse sparrow
#

/close

#

sorry lol

jolly ginkgo
#

There are 7! arrangements of those 7 numbers so we divide by it

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @jolly ginkgo

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

vale dirge
#

is it true that if ab=ba then atbt = btat?
a and b are matrices of course

timid silo
#

$A^TB^T=B^TA^T$, right?

warm shaleBOT
timid silo
#

the t are transposes?

vale dirge
#

yeah

timid silo
#

take transposes of both sides of AB=BA

vale dirge
#

oh, right, $(AB)^t=(BA)t-> B^TA^T=A^tB^T$

warm shaleBOT
#

marchello

vale dirge
#

forgot about it

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @vale dirge

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

strong oxide
#

a

obtuse pebbleBOT
elfin ether
#

?_?

royal basin
obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@strong oxide Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

north anchor
#

help

obtuse pebbleBOT
north anchor
#

how i can determine f(x) or g(x)?

high lily
#

wdym

north anchor
#

How do I know if one curve is greater than the other?

high lily
#

graphing helps

thin pawn
#

rule of thumb is graph it and it's top function - bottom function

north anchor
#

last part can help me?

thin pawn
#

i don't understand, what do you need help with?

north anchor
#

I need to know what is f(x) and g(x)

#

I don't know if what I did is correct, so far it's working for me

high lily
#

graphing helps

thin pawn
north anchor
#

this part

thin pawn
#

@high lily can you solve bottom function - top function and just take absolute value in the end?

high lily
#

yes

thin pawn
#

well then @north anchor just take whatever function you want and do that. No need to try and find whichever is on top

#

| f(x) - g(x) | = | g(x) - f(x) |

coral glade
#

ooo functions

#

very easy stuff thid

high lily
#

need to be careful and ensure that one is always greater or equal to the other

#

graphing helps
don't skimp

north anchor
#

idk how graph function

high lily
#

then go back and review

#

its something you should know
and one of the prerequisites before even starting any calculus

#

how the heck are you expecting to do stuff like analyse behaviour of function of you don't have a basic idea of how to graph them

north anchor
#

the upper function is f(x) and the lower one is g(x)?

high lily
#

are you implying you don't know how to graph stuff like
y = x^2?

north anchor
#

yes is like a u

high lily
#

and what's stopping you from graphing
y = 16x^2

north anchor
#

idk

#

wdym with this | f(x) - g(x) | = | g(x) - f(x) |

high lily
#

that's a property of the abs val

#

|k| = |-k|

#

don't worry too much about that

#

idk
try it

#

same idea with
y = sqrt(4x)

north anchor
#

But in case both functions are the same, what do I do?

high lily
#

wdym the same

#

they are clearly different functions

#

having a visual representation of the problem as evident in the sketch they have
gives a clear indication of which function is greater

#

and when doing the problem yourself you should make a sketch/diagram just like they have

wintry portal
#

,rotate

warm shaleBOT
wintry portal
#

Help me on this one

#

Q8

high lily
north anchor
high lily
#

well for that example, it seems more convenient to integrate wrt y

#

,rotate

warm shaleBOT
high lily
#

and observe in the interval which graph is above the other

north anchor
high lily
#

interval for the region

#

in this case from y = -1 to 1

north anchor
#

yo evaluate both function?

high lily
#

wdym

north anchor
#

[-1,1] can use 0.1 to evaluate

high lily
#

wdym can use 0.1 to evaluate

#

where's 0.1 coming from

north anchor
north anchor
high lily
#

still doesn't explain where 0.1 is coming from

north anchor
#

of the range of the interval

high lily
#

like you said [-1,1]
that's the interval

#

0.1 is in that interval, but doesn't tell me why you're using it and you're expecting to get from that

north anchor
#

I hope to see when evaluating it that they tell me who is the oldest or the youngest

high lily
#

why are you so insistent on NOT graphing

#

if you insist on doing it purely algebraically, there are nice values to use

north anchor
#

it is graphed

high lily
#

if its graphed already

#

then you should be able to clearly see from the graph which function is greater

#

no need to do additional tests

north anchor
#

I can't see it, both functions have the same address

high lily
#

can you not clearly see from that that the purple is above the brown (except at the intersection points)

#

or that the purple is above the green

north anchor
#

i see it thx

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@north anchor Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @north anchor

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

timid silo
#

could be a mental lapse thing, but could someone help me with this

My question:
a number when divided by 7 gives 4 as remainder and when divided by 3 gives 2 as remainder. Find the possible values of the number.

My answer:
n_1 = 7q + 4
n_2 = 3q + 2

I know i could list out a bunch of numbers where q takes any integral values and see the common points

timid silo
#

But is there a way for me to get the entire family of solutions so that i can instantly find instances where n_1 = n_2

kind hawk
#

this is the chinese remainder theorem

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@timid silo Has your question been resolved?

timid silo
#

Mhm, what about it?

#

it's the euclidean division algorithm i presume

kind hawk
#

no that's something else (although of course related)

#

the chinese remainder theorem first tells you that there are solutions to these types of equations (provided the numbers you divide by are coprime) and gives you an algorithm to calculate the solution (which is unique up to the lcm of the numbers)

#

btw dont ignore the bot

timid silo
#

it'd given me the entire family of solutions?

#

how do i even know the two numbers are coprime though

kind hawk
#

I mean the 7 and 3

#

those have to be coprime

timid silo
#

ah you mean the number we're dividing with have to be coprime

#

sure

#

they are

kind hawk
#

if you asked the same question but with eg 8 and 6 instead of 7 and 3 then you might not find solutions

timid silo
#

"might not" meaning it's more of an undefined behavior thing?

#

Also just to confirm the way i setup the equation is fine using division algorithm right?

#

or was i supposed to use different variables for q

#

for some reason they used a different variable in one of the solutions but i never saw the need to do so

kind hawk
#

"might not" means that sometimes there are solutions and sometimes there are not. depending on which remainders you want

#

yes you should have used different variables for the q

#

n_1 = 7q+4

#

and n_1 = 3k + 2

#

here one solution is obviously 11

#

11 = 7*1 + 4

#

and 11 = 3*3 + 2

#

q and k are different

timid silo
#

right i bruteforced it and i did get 11 and 47

#

i could keep going but i was just curious about a generalized method

kind hawk
#

47 = 5 mod 7

timid silo
#

isn't q integers?

#

in both cases

kind hawk
#

and?

#

are all integers the same?

timid silo
#

Lol are they not? I'm confused wym

kind hawk
#

is 1=3?

timid silo
#

No

kind hawk
#

but here we have q=1 and k=3

#

so we cant use q for both

timid silo
#

So basically you define q differently because they have to be yield the same value (n_1)?

kind hawk
#

they will be different numbers

#

you cant use the same variable for different numbers

timid silo
#

Yeah i get that you use different values of q to get n_1 in both cases cuz ofc you require different linear combinations to get the same value

#

i was confused why my definition would be wrong then

#

I'm using the logic that q is same in both instances so i take the same integer

#

but ofc in the process the n_1 and n_2 would be different

#

no?

#

I guess it doesn't make practical sense for me to define it the way i did (?)

kind hawk
#

well but that's not what you want

timid silo
#

okay yeah brain's just foggy now lol you just want instances where n_1 is equal in both cases therefore q has to change

#

also just to clarify for the generalized remainder theorem: a = bq + r

0<= r< b and a,b, and q are integers would be the only conditions?

kind hawk
#

so the general theorem is that given integers a and b there exist unique integers q,r with a=bq+r and 0<=r<b

#

which you prove with eg euclidean algorithm

timid silo
#

any reason why they use the word "unique integers" and not just "integers"?

#

or is that supposed to signify the shifting nature of q (taking any integer values)

kind hawk
#

well in general there will be lots of options to write a like that. 7 = 3*2+1 = 3*1 + 4 = 3*15 + (-38) = ...

#

but the condition 0<=r<b actually makes this unique so that you only get one solution

timid silo
#

one solution of what? could you give an example

kind hawk
#

of writing it in that form with 0<=r<b

#

there is only the one way to write 7 = 3*2+1 with remainder r=1 satisfying 0<=1<3

#

there is no other option

#

which is trivial for small numbers but not so obvious for big numbers

#

you can't write 7 = 3*some integer + (some number between 0 and 3) in some different way other than 7=3*2+1

timid silo
timid silo
#

isn't that just algebra or am i missing something

#

7 = 3*(some integer) + (take any integer from (0,3)) then find the "some integer"?

#

i think i'm probably missing the intricacy lol

#

also could we go to the chinese remainder theorem part now?

kind hawk
#

its not obvious that there is a unique solution to this