#help-10
1 messages · Page 137 of 1
yip
Welll, I can sort of like guess that the minima is -2, but I am not able to put it rigorously
i guess i will just do the graph and determine the range from that
If you write that function in even simpler format, you would write it down as
y = (t - 4)sqrt(t - 1)
well i dont think you are supposed to
where t goes from (1, inf)
guys i dont get why x^4-5x^2+4 becomes (x^2 - 4)
are you familiar with quadratic factoring?
i dont think so bro
wait guys im not english im from italy
i dont understand
quadratic factoring what you mean
this is the same
I think he is, but its a method used universally
what's ruffini
i studied ruffini actually but i dont remember it lmao
is this a ligma prank
oh like that
hmm you can do that
but if you look at x^4 - 5x^2 + 4
you can replace x^2 with u
and then the equation becomes u^2-5u+4
you can factor u out, and replace it with x^2
My algebra has gotten worse, I don't know why the heck can't I move forward with such a simple equation lol
finding the minimum?
y = (t-4)sqrt(t - 1)
finding it's minima without differential
ok i understand but i do it in a much slower way
to answer this
go back to the original equation
what happens when you multiply the numerator and denominator by sqrt(x^2-1)
i know that
i think is like this x^4 - 5x^2 + 4 = (x^2-1)(x^2-4) not like this x^4-5x^2+4 becomes (x^2 - 4)
ah ok
now back to the original question
to find the minimum
doing this will show us the whole range
hmm
i know limits but more than that no
idk
you can differentiate using limits I meannn
YOU CAN DO ANYTHING
normally to find range i do the inverse and then find the domain of the inverse or i just see it from the graph
with my knowledge
do you want to use derivatives or only limits?
only limits but if is long dont worry, you already have been helpful
hmm
i dont know how you could do this with limits
you have to use derivatives here
no problem man
You can derive the derivative using limits though
you have been a lot helpful guys
OHHHH
but leave it, it will only cause more pain lol
lim x -> 0, (f(x + a) - f(x)) / a
if you are curious enough, evaluate this limit
after you have done so, you'll get a formula. Set that equal to 0, and the value of x you get is the value where minima's at
shouldnt it be lim x -> a (f(x) - f(a)) / x-a
nope
this is the derivative in general
yeah
actually its the limit as a approaches 0 here
oh woops, sorry
and thats f'(x)
yeah, I meant, we can derive the general formula for derivative here, and put that equal to 0
guys i go thx for your time
i will comeback when i learn derivatives
is the next thing i will learn at school
.close
Closed by @sinful marsh
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
W
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Let d be a metric on a non-empty set X. Define ρ as follows, for x, y ∈ X:
ρ(x, y) = min {1, d(x, y)} .
Prove carefully that ρ is a metric on X.
so, I have done the first two steps
so proving ρ(x,y)=0 iff x=y
and the second proving ρ(x,y)=ρ(y,x)
but in proving ρ(x,z)<= ρ(x,y)+ρ(y,z), I ran into a bit of a problem
so I used the fact that d is already a metric, thus it satisfies all the criteria
so
I found that, putting it very rough.
ρ(x,z)<= min{1,d(x,y)+d(y,z)}
reason being because we already know that the triangle inequality holds for the metric d
The next logical step would be, in my opinion to split it
as
min{1,d(x,y)+d(y,z)}
=
min{1,d(x,y)}+min{1,d(y,z)}
and that would then conclude the proof
But I don't think you're allowed to do that.
@manic slate Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@manic slate Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@manic slate Has your question been resolved?
check this:
p(x,y)+p(y,z)=min{d(x,y)+d(y,z),d(x,y)+1,d(y,z)+1,2}
can u show triangle inequality now?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone fimd the An of this sequence
Its geometric
<@&286206848099549185>
I found it was geometric
But i dont know how to apply it
try separating the numerator and denominator as their own sequences
Oh is it 2^n / 3^n
now simplify
How to do that
please request a new nickname
do you know how to do this?
@night fossil Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @night fossil
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
why is c not correct
a number times a vector for example 5u is just legal I thought right?
here that dot specifically represents the dot product
not just normal scalar multiplication
but well they are being a bit strict
in a) for example you could in theory also just define the norm of a number (which would then just end up being the absolute value)
well one is a dot product between vectors
and the other is scalar multiplication between scalar and vector
ah ye but the excercise ask why it doesn't make sense
for that one I do understand it doesn't make sense
the first gives a number as result, the second gives a vector as result
Yes
so for b it's like
a number
- vector
ah okay I tihnk I got the hang of it now
.close
Closed by @proven zealot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
do u also maybe know why this step is legal?
what is example 1.9
this but
this is the previous chapter
I think I will skip this question the proof is like 2 pages
.close
Closed by @proven zealot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
btw can u maybe explain this theory
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
need help with this
Chainrule+product
I know how to do it
however i get confused
when i need to factor
could you show me how i can factor it?
I found have it in the form f'(x)g(x)+f(x)+g'(x) already
Lmk if you can help
<@&286206848099549185>
.close
Closed by @reef adder
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm supposed to solve this using law of sines
I'm not sure how to get the height using only a side and angle
<@&286206848099549185>
@indigo coyote Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone check if i did this right or not i dont have access to the answer sheet
Looks good to me.
@left jetty Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Im a college freshman taking trigonometry, my highest level of math is very very basic algebra, (i failed alg1 and cheated through alg2 since i had very confusing and hard to understand teachers in high school, zoom learning didnt help either) and i have my first trigonometry exam tomorrow and trig concepts feels so alien to me, where can i start cramming knowledge and learn fast before i take my exam? im super lost
this is the study guide^
idk that seems to b the standard
um
the max i know is basic alg, simplifying square roots that kinda stuff
idt im good at giving advice
TnT
i wld say its basic
maybe
but um
normally u ask specific questions u have here
do u have any specific Q u dont get
bascially everything lol trig is a foreign concept to me
you know unit circle?
no
unit circle is a circle with center in origin and radius 1
cos and sin are defined from the unit circle
ah i think i seen about it in class but i didnt understand it
every point in the circle will be $(cos(\theta),sin(\theta))$
Køter
where $\theta$ is the angle at that point
Køter
itll always b this
so the x coordinate for that point is $x=cos(\theta)$ and the y coordinate $y=sin(\theta)$
ay got ur own drawing
Køter
yes 💀
yeah im confused, i dont understand the 6 trig functions either
what specifically is confusing about the drawing i made
honestly what you should probably do
if you have a few hours
is go watch all of the khan academy videos and do the exercises
watch khan aca
the numbers on the outside and the trig functions purpose
but make sure to do it when you're not sleepy
you can't cram this stuff without the stuff from before
it just doesn't work very effectively
sleep is impt
the numbers on the outside is reffering to the radius of the circle
sleep and eat well
and the trig functions purpose is that when you have the point on the unit circle
the x coordinate will be cos(theta) and the y cooridnate will be sin(theta)
bet ill try my hardest
and like don't try to speedrun it
actually do it like you're trying to learn what's going on
ah gocha
skip the stuff about conic sections or whatever
ight, do i learn trig on khan or should i also learn the algebra i missed out on?
you need to start at the beginning
if that means it's algebra 1
then that's where you start
you start at somewhere where you have a good understanding of everything before
if you can't do place value or multiplication, start there
not saying that you'll manage to get everything 100%
but if there's something there, then you'll do immensely better at studying the stuff you need for the exam
so save like 4 hours before the exam, and spend the first two reviewing the exam subjects on khan academy, and then spend the next one making a "cheat sheet" paper that you write everything important you want to remember on the exam
and depending on the exam, if you're allowed to use it, then use it, if not then just toss it in the trash bin
bet ill do my best, we are allowed only a ti83 or 84 and a sheet of paper thats all 😬
so bascically ima have to memorize all the trig functions 😢
you don't really
wdym
@west sigil Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @west sigil
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I dont have access to the answer sheet can someone confirm if this is right or not?
@left jetty Has your question been resolved?
@left jetty Has your question been resolved?
Looks correct ✅
.close
Closed by @left jetty
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello
can i get help with a pascal triangle question *
ok, so what's troubling you with this
Closed by @dense venture
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm really confused with the associative property
I've got brackets where they're not supposed to be, and I'm not sure why
my version looks like everything in the numerator is being multiplied, but it's actually adding and subtracting everything in the first and third terms
did I mess up this part somehow?
@shadow lava Has your question been resolved?
yes you did
hmmm
I don't see it
and how to remove the brackets from the 1st and 3rd factors
when you factor out (2x-3)^3 from
(40x+32)(2x-3)^3 - 20(20x-3)^4
you should have had:
(2x-3)^3 * [(40x+32) - 20(20x-3)]
but your (40x+32) got stuck outside
for no apparent reason, even an erroneous one
i think you've got their names confused as well.
bad sign
if you keep the parentheses on, it's
...[(40x+32)-(40x-60)]
now it is good, except for a stray unmatched ) at the right which should be erased
that's OK too? or should I always keep the brackets on if I distribute
it sounds like the brackets are OK on or off, as long as I distribute correctly
if there are extra brackets they will go away with + - being the only operators left in the square brackets?
I think I'm finally starting to see it, but man this was challenging for me. I just need to double check on the brackets after distribution. Good practice to keep them?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
What is your question
well, the work you've now done is correct
forgetting the rules of distribution, association, when enclosed in brackets with another distribution happening
glad to see I finally found it
Closed by @shadow lava
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can I get explaination of how to go from step 1 to 2
First they canceled the 2 on both sides
Since 162=81×2
Seems like they also multiplied 81 on both sides
To get rid of the denominator on the RHS
Wait how does that work
Divide by 2 on both sides
They divided both sides by 2
So what is rhs
I can explain that
Pls do
Bloxx12
I cant use the tool sorry
O
But say we have (1/n)^2 for example
Any exponent works though
Then this is equal to n^-2
A negative exponent
And n-1 becomes -n+1
Maybe?
jay.
No i dont think so
Idk I got it from brainly.in
What about the 1/3?
The LHS is 3^(1-n), but the RHS is 3^(n-1)
Oh wait what
Yeah i didn't see that
Pfff what the hell lol
Thats stupid
Elaborate
Wdym
But in the 3rd line its correct again
It would be 1/3 ^1-n then
Yes that's why the second line is incorrect
Yep
That's why this is right
Anyway what happened on the left side on 4th step
81=3^4, right?
You can rewrite it as $(3^4)^2(3)^{1-n}$
jay.
$(a^m)(a^n)=a^{m+n}$
jay.
Are you familiar with this rule
8+1-n is dragged down after 3 is canceled on both sides
You can think of it as taking log_3 on both sides
Ok
$Log_3{3^{8+1+n}}=8+1-n$
jay.
That way the 3 cancels and you're left with the exponents
Closed by @true breach
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
for the last couple of questions I plugged the x into the derivative equation and it worked fine but for these value looks like they plug into normal function. so when do I plug into function and when into derivative? (absolute minima and maxima on closed intervals)
@timid silo Has your question been resolved?
@timid silo Has your question been resolved?
They both can be used to show the presence of a critical point
@timid silo
f(x) will be rising and reaching a maxima which is also a critical point as after that f(x) changes direction or is dropping in value
Try to see why this happens , plot f(x) and then see what happens to it before and after a critical point as well as at the critical point
Also remember that the derivative is the slope of the tangent you draw to a point
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@rain cove Has your question been resolved?
@rain cove Has your question been resolved?
What is interquartile range
@rain cove Has your question been resolved?
@rain cove Has your question been resolved?
@rain cove Has your question been resolved?
@rain cove Has your question been resolved?
if it doesn't have to be analytical, any numerical integration method for a given a and b will work
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
so is ∫₃¹⁵ f(x) dx the same as ∫₃¹⁵ f(u) du
@sudden leaf Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @sudden leaf
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi
I was having trouble solving my washer method and don't know what's wrong with the steps I did. I have included the problem and my work
@trim star Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @trim star
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello
relevant link: https://dontasktoask.com/
@white knot Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey, im having a bit of trouble with this question, anybody mind helping me out
I simply don’t understand how I’d go about answering it, I’ve figured out the volume of the cake tin, but I’m a bit stuck.
u should first make sure the units can fit with each other in your calculations
volume over area would give you the depth, since water would fit the container
Ok, i know the volume is 19,739.188cm cubed
A mm cubed is one one thousandth of a cm cubed correct?
And cubed we multiply by 10 3 times right
So wait, should i multiply the area of the bottom by ml’s converted into cm cubed?
why multiply?
anyways u should convert mL to mm^3
or cm^3, whichever is more convenient
That would be 200cm^3 then right since ml = cm^3
yes!
ok draw the shape of the water after it's poured
how do u get the length of the cylinder if you have its volume and top area?
I know the diameter is 20cm, so the radius is 10cm, so the area is pi x r^2
yep
height = volume/area
= (volume of cylinder, which is the volume of water) / ( pi x r^2)
pi * diameter would be circumference????
Oh wait yeah, and i don’t need height since I’d be using the depth of the water
As height
So how do i use the 200ml to find the height knowing that it’s filling a space with an area of 314.1592cm^2
Can i convert ml’s to cm^2 or just cm^3 by the way?
Okay, i figured out, i had to turn the 200ml into 20,000cm^2, then divide that by the area of the circle, and then divide that answer by ten
To get mm’s
So thanks, i don’t need anymore help
yes of course both are fine. U can convert any volume unit to any volume unit, as long as the idea is the same
not just volumes, areas, lengths, energy, whatever
Ok
I was a bit confused cause I haven't done stuff like that in a while, I've stopped being taught some of the basics in exchange for more formulaic stuff which makes it hard to figure out stuff i don't know the formula for
@proper oak Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi I would like to ask how to do 7a without excel
uhhh
cant you use the normal distribution set
like the standard normal distribution table?
@bold siren Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @bold siren
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I am struggling with finding this derivative using implicit differentiation. I get as far as the quotient rule but i am struggling with the algebra to solve for dy/dx.
I feel like i should have it but i cannot see the step i am missing.
for the initial applications of derivative rules, you can leave dy/dx as dy/dx
can you show what you've done so far?
Ill have to take a picture of my work using my phone. give me a minute please and ill post it.
@lament estuary Has your question been resolved?
I circled the area of algebra i was working with. I have only been working with the LHS because the RHS is pretty simple. It is just 2dy/dx.
In my pic here, the top left of my circled area is where i started and the rest is just me trying to find our where to go with my algebra.
(My algebra is wrong)
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello
i got a question
can you give me an example when you dont?
Well one example is where if I were to find the hypervolume of y over a cylinder
I would let
x = rcos(θ)
y = rsin(θ)
Although r and theta are both parameters
my teacher has put that as the answer
Yeah that's fine
I mean if we wanna graph it on the polar plane
Then having r = something makes it jice
But if you're using polars to parameterize then you don't need to
so leaving it as rcos + 4(rsin) = 2 is good if you want to convert to polar equation
You can still isolate r though
hm
but then there is this problem y^2 = 3x
and she did solve for 4
r*
and she got r=3cot + csc
both questions are asking to convert to polar equation
equation
You don't need to isolate r then I think
ok
If you're not expected a function
Closed by @frail lake
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
so the function g2(x):
to show case that it is invertible my teacher did this:
basically, since the function is strongly increasing in the interval [-1, 4], this means it is invertible
you mean strictly increasing?
but my question is, cant we showcase for each value for x when -1 <= x <= 4 that each input has a unique output
yes
the same thing but an indirect route
just unwind the definition of 1-1
(assuming the function is shown to be onto)
Closed by @sour fox
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what the diff
are you looking for the antiderivative?
no like what the diffrent between this two like any example of each one to see the diffrent
@stable vector Has your question been resolved?
unclear since R isn't defined
you need to show the entire context for people to help you
.close
Closed by @stable vector
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
x^2+2x+2 = (x+1)^2
Well, no, +1 to that
Hi, I have to evaluate the oblique asymptotes for this function
What I have tried after evaluating the slope is to find where the asymptotes touch the y axis
So to do this I extracted x^2 from the square root and then I took x^2 from the numerator
$\lim_{x \to +\infty} \frac{x^2(4-\frac{8}{x} + \frac{4}{x^2})}{3x\sqrt{1+\frac{2}{x} + \frac{2}{x^2}}} - \frac{4}{3}x$
FriedrichDN
But actually the right decision was to multiply the square on both sides and then use Taylor after extracting x^2
I don’t get why this is correct
think of e^x for example
the taylor series for e^x is 1+x+x^2/2+x^3/3!+x^4/4!...
consider the graph of xe^(2/x)/2
you can look at the taylor series expansion of xe^(2/x)/2
e^x is 1+x+x^2/2+x^3/3!+x^4/4!...
e^(2/x) is 1+2/x +(2/x)^2/2+(2/x)^3/3!+(2/x)^4/4!...
xe^(2/x)/2 is x(1+2/x +(2/x)^2/2+(2/x)^3/3!+(2/x)^4/4!...)/2
xe^(2/x)/2 = x/2+1 +x(2/x)^2/4+x(2/x)^3/12+x(2/x)^4/48...
as x goes to infinity, the other terms get smaller and smaller
you get left with x/2+1
which is what the oblique asymptote approaches
so using the taylor series helps
But why I can’t just multiple for the square root and then extract x^2
All the times everyone comes up with an example and doesn't say why my opinion is wrong
And I end up with a checklist of things to not do instead of getting why
<@&286206848099549185>
@timid silo Has your question been resolved?
Maybe I understand why
The numerator it’s ok
But brutally simply the denominator with 1 is not right because its like using the first order of Taylor expansion
Of the denominator
So the approximation is not good
So actually the idea is to extract what I can and then see if this lead me to a 0 caused by a bad approximation
If that’s true I have to take the next order Taylor expansion
<@&286206848099549185> am I right?
@timid silo Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@timid silo Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im very new to induction, i have a proof for Consider a chessboard of size 2n ×2n for some arbitrary positive integer n. Remove any square
from the board. Is it possible to tile the remaining squares with L-shaped triominoes could i walk someone through it
im not entirely sure its correct
om charbit
my saviour
okay so the base case would be
n = 1
meaning that our board is 2 x 2
and we know that without loss of generality
we can place the L piece anywhere
because it can be oriented
and we can choose the orientation based on the missing tile
for our inductive hypothesis
Assume 2^n x 2^n is true, and show that 2^n+1 x 2^n +1 is also true
im pretty sure you need to divide your board into 4 coordinates
the idea is to apply the inductive hypothesis on the 4 quadrant
i have a drawing
actually no im wrong
i dont know : c
[I'm not actually super sure how you'd do it, but wanted to check over what you had
]
Hmmm it is a question though 
I mean the subdivision thing seems like a good idea, but then if you remove just one square, while the quadrant you removed it from, you can do the induction hypothesis on
For the others, you'd still be "full", and so there's no guarantee you can tile those ones, is there? 
you cant pick where the missing tile will be but you can choose specific missing tiles in the other coordinate such that you know you are able to fill it in based on the inductive hypothesis?
Hmm I was thinking along those lines, you can't choose where the removed one would be sure, and of course you could remove more so that you can use the induction hypothesis on those...
Oh, what about at the "centre"?
I was thinking that for the ones that don't have the missing tiles, remove a tile from the "centre" and then you'd be able to induction hypothesis to cover those, and then clearly you can cover the "removed" three with another L
[I had that typed out already haha]
Does that not work? 
can you say this
like for the ones that dont have missing tiles
That was my thought, and it seems to me to work, right?
it should work based on the base case?
i mean i know you use the inductive hypothesis but
dont laught at my pain
terrible
i hate my university
we are programming something to covert pre to postfix with stacks and queues and i want to kms
uh wdym
i dont mind programming i just procrastinated and so now im suffering, but i only procrastinate because my courseload is terrible and my c class is not the only class im trying to pass
like they ask the prefix to postfix notation
dude i also had to like turn a queue into a dictionary to have precidence of values in the queue
i had to implement a postfix calculator
whcih wasnt that bad
non eof this is bad uh i just procrastinated and im using a late day
uh yeah
right
the point is to leave the center part emtpy for any quadrant not containing the tile
?
thats what i said
oh well
let me show
i dont know how to word the center thing
because technically this has four cases
based on the quadrant, what needs to be left empty is
okay i guess id have to state all of them actually
no?
Can just assume without loss of generality no?
The cases for the others, you'd argue almost identically
uh i dont know how to word that the tiles we choose to be empty should be the ones facing the center if that makes any sense
this part
As for wording it
depends on how exactly they would want you to state it I think
Thoughts for extra clarity would be to "coordinates" it, if you get what I mean? But then that might be a bit overkill
Part of me feels that stating something like this is "obvious", but then it might not be 
"for the quadrants that do not have a missing tile, remove the tile that is closest to the centre. We can then use the induction hypothesis to deduce that the remaining tiles in those three quadrants can be tiled, and on returning those tiles, we will have an L shape that can be covered by a triomino" or something like that
also unrelated but what is the purpose of the base case
might be a bad q, just want to make sure i understand fs
basically if you don't know the base case is true
and only the inductive case
it doesn't prove that everything is true
the classic example of this is "all cars are the same colour" or variants of that
For example, "for all positive integers n, we have n > n + 1" or something
i think im also confused about the inductive case
you could number each piece as 1, 2, 3, 4
like where is the inductive case derived from
like idk in cs, recursion is basically assuming your code works
is this the same thing
and then say that piece 1 has a gap in its bottom left, piece 2 has a gap in its top right, piece 3 has a gap in its top left
yes it is
and also say WLOG, assume that the missing corner is the top right or something
is induction recursion, or is recursion induction
hmm it's more like
why?
because you can always rotate it so the missing corner is in the top right
you can show that recursion works with induction
like given a recursive algorithm, you can show via induction that it works
like rotate the individual quadrant?
is that even necessary?
not really, it's pretty obvious that there's rotational symmetry
[I'd vote no]
but if you're dealing with someone who's really hard with the logic, you can say that we'll show there exists an arrangement for the top right corner
and then by rotating everything, we now have an arrangement for the bottom left corner
also how do you usually end these proofs
the rest of the proof is left as an exercise to the grader
:/ gonna pull that on my programming
pro gaming
in all seriousness, I usually wrap up inductive proofs with something like, "since we have proven P(base case) and that for all n, P(n) implies P(n+1), we conclude that P(n) is true for all natural numbers >= base case"
but you could also end it with AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA THIS MAJOR SUCKS
"I swear down, if you say this proof is wrong, gaaah"
it does but its stupid to use n = 0
looks fine
Yea I'm happy with it personally 
need all the points you can get before the grades go into a dumpster fire next year
and it becomes dopamine the business major
ha my grades already in the dumster fire now
no my parents would make my go home
my tuition too expensive for me to not study cs
sounds like asian parents
you could study something else and tell your parents that you're studying math
or cs
i told you many times that i like cs
i just am not good at this because ive never done it before
same honestly
poh shen loh lovers
oh yeah se induction to prove for any n ∈ N, any set with exactly n-many distinct elements has
exactly 2^n-many distinct subsets. also confuses me
my math major friend was trying to explain but uh
i did not understand it at all
so basically this amounts to expressing the subsets of the (n+1) set in terms of those of the n set
does that make sense so far?
right
so consider the subsets of the (n+1) set
actually let's do a more concrete example
the subsets of the set {1, 2} are:
{}
{1}
{2}
{1, 2}
and the subsets of the set {1,2,3} are:
{}
{3}
{1}
{1, 3}
{2}
{2, 3}
{1, 2}
{1, 2, 3}
and I wrote them in that order to sorta help you figure out the pattern here
do you see how the subsets of the set {1, 2} each correspond to two of them of {1, 2, 3}?
its half and half
wdym
well yeah
so differently stated, you can take each of the subsets of {1, 2}, and you have two choices to make a subset of {1, 2, 3} by either including 3 or not, right?
correct
so you might say that there are twice as many subsets of {1, 2, 3} as {1, 2} right?
yes
does that help you prove the inductive case?
do you define the natural numbers to include 0
so then your base case has to be n=0, because you need to prove it for all natural numbers
unless you want to add in the extra bit that says it also holds for n=0 somewhere else
no
I remember all of my CS profs defined N to include 0 and all of my math profs said no
weird that way
its not weird
everything in cs starts with 0
in math, 0 isnt even a real number to my knowledge
like
especially your grades 😩
its just 0
LOL it definitely is
yeah idk dude never got a 40 percent on a midterm before this year
i wish my school had grade inflation
dude at berkley you can fail all ur midterms and STILL GET A B IN THE CLASS
surely your classes are curved right?
I remember getting a B- in a machine learning class despite totally failing the exams and messing up the final project LOL
: c : c im gonna be a systems person
yeah that's why it's berkeley
just wait until you get into networking and all of the graph bullshit comes back
im now confident i will eventually be good at this math stuff
i just need to work hard or whatever
idk
uh okay so the base case is the empty set right
I sucked at it compared to the math majors
yeah the base case is n=0, which corresponds to the empty set
i stay away from real math majors
I got peer pressured into going into hard math classes by my math major friends
got absolutely destroyed
I still don't even know how to solve a PDE despite having failed a class in it
Assume that any set will have $2^n$ distinct elements and show that any set will also have $2^{n + 1}$ distinct elements.
dopamine
the fking prof literally starts the first lecture with some Lagrangian mechanics
IT TRANSLATES LATEX/
LOL
Assume that any set with n elements will have $2^n$ distinct subsets and show that any set n + 1 elements will also have $2^{n + 1}$ distinct subsets.
dopamine
wait this is so fun
if i knew tis was a thing i woulda just made all my questions in latecx
latex is like vim
You didn't know that there was $\LaTeX$ here?
@unreal musk
uh i knew but i didnt know it just parses discord messages into atex
i get this and it makes sense but idk how this ties in with the IH
the fact that it's {1, 2} really has no bearing
like it could have 1000 elements
well actually you have to do it in a little bit reversed order
so let's say I have a set of 1001 elements
I trim off the last element, call it THE_LAST_ELEMENT
now I have a set of 1000 elements, which we'll call B = A \ {THE_LAST_ELEMENT}
the subsets of A are precisely the disjoint union of {all subsets of B} and {all subsets of B with THE_LAST_ELEMENT added on}
you can show rather quickly that both of these have 2^1000 elements by the inductive hypothesis
also if you don't feel like working with arbitrary sets, you could insert a short remark about how we can convert these to {1, ... n} by counting, but not sure if your TA will like that
we didnt learn counting yet
--- dopamine 2023
this is a weird way of putting it
i think i get what youre saying
{all subsets of B with THE_LAST_ELEMENT added on}
wdym here
like added on means put into the subset
so for example, we name a subset of {1, 2, 3} like {1, 3}
this is just {1} with 3 added into it
right
or maybe I should say it this way: all subsets of A can be classed into two disjoint classes
those that contain THE_LAST_ELEMENT and those that don't
disjoint meaning only UNIQUE elements
disjoint means that they don't overlap
and if you remove all of the THE_LAST_ELEMENT from those that contain it, then they're just the subsets of B
obviously these sets don't necessarily have orders, so you can't really say something is the "last" one, but any choice of element will work
this isnt programming
hmm okay do you want a programming analogy for this
maybe that'll help you understand the logic
yes
so imagine that you have a set {a, b, c, d}
oml okay
the subsets can be represented as the binary numbers from 0 to 15:
0000
0001
0010
...
1111
twos complement
where to get from a binary number to the set, you just take each digit and use that to say whether the thing is in there
no not twos complement, positive binary numbers
basically you construct a subset as follows:
do I include a? (2 choices)
do I include b? (2 choices)
...
well python doesn't overflow or underflow, but surely CPython implements integer arithmetic with some twos complement stuff for numbers in the usual range
and this makes 16 choices
basically in {1, 2, 3} if we take 3, half of the subsets will include 3 and half wont
yes