#help-10

1 messages · Page 137 of 1

ancient jacinth
#

you rationalized the denominator

#

i see now

#

yes you can do that

ruby ravine
#

yip

ancient jacinth
#

thats actually easier

#

because the zeroes of f(x) are easier to see

ruby ravine
#

Welll, I can sort of like guess that the minima is -2, but I am not able to put it rigorously

ancient jacinth
sinful marsh
#

i guess i will just do the graph and determine the range from that

ruby ravine
#

If you write that function in even simpler format, you would write it down as

y = (t - 4)sqrt(t - 1)

ancient jacinth
#

well i dont think you are supposed to

ruby ravine
#

where t goes from (1, inf)

ancient jacinth
sinful marsh
#

guys i dont get why x^4-5x^2+4 becomes (x^2 - 4)

ruby ravine
sinful marsh
#

i dont think so bro

ancient jacinth
#

can you solve x^2 - 5x + 4 = 0

#

by factoring

sinful marsh
#

wait guys im not english im from italy

#

i dont understand

#

quadratic factoring what you mean

ancient jacinth
#

x^2+3x+2= (x+1)(x+2)

#

do you know how to do this?

sinful marsh
#

this is the same

latent notch
#

correct?

ancient jacinth
#

is that italian

latent notch
#

That’s how you factor

#

bruh

latent notch
ancient jacinth
#

what's ruffini

sinful marsh
#

i studied ruffini actually but i dont remember it lmao

ancient jacinth
#

is this a ligma prank

latent notch
ancient jacinth
#

oh like that

latent notch
#

yeah

#

thats the ruffini method

ancient jacinth
#

hmm you can do that

sinful marsh
#

i just find the 2 solutions with delta

#

im noob

ancient jacinth
#

but if you look at x^4 - 5x^2 + 4
you can replace x^2 with u
and then the equation becomes u^2-5u+4

#

you can factor u out, and replace it with x^2

ruby ravine
#

My algebra has gotten worse, I don't know why the heck can't I move forward with such a simple equation lol

ruby ravine
#

y = (t-4)sqrt(t - 1)

ruby ravine
sinful marsh
ancient jacinth
#

ok

#

but in both cases you get x^4 - 5x^2 + 4 = (x^2-1)(x^2-4)

ancient jacinth
#

go back to the original equation

#

what happens when you multiply the numerator and denominator by sqrt(x^2-1)

sinful marsh
#

i know that

ancient jacinth
sinful marsh
#

i think is like this x^4 - 5x^2 + 4 = (x^2-1)(x^2-4) not like this x^4-5x^2+4 becomes (x^2 - 4)

ancient jacinth
#

yes

#

the x^2-1 will divide

sinful marsh
#

ah ok

ancient jacinth
#

now back to the original question

#

to find the minimum

#

doing this will show us the whole range

sinful marsh
#

i dont have studied the minimum yet :/

#

i just started derivatives

ancient jacinth
#

hmm

sinful marsh
#

i know limits but more than that no

ancient jacinth
#

does the problem require only limits?

#

no calculus allowed?

sinful marsh
#

idk

ruby ravine
sinful marsh
#

i find this function online just to practice

#

maybe i cant do it

ancient jacinth
#

YOU CAN DO ANYTHING

sinful marsh
#

normally to find range i do the inverse and then find the domain of the inverse or i just see it from the graph

sinful marsh
ancient jacinth
#

do you want to use derivatives or only limits?

sinful marsh
#

only limits but if is long dont worry, you already have been helpful

ancient jacinth
#

hmm

#

i dont know how you could do this with limits

#

you have to use derivatives here

sinful marsh
#

no problem man

ruby ravine
#

You can derive the derivative using limits though

sinful marsh
#

you have been a lot helpful guys

ancient jacinth
ruby ravine
#

but leave it, it will only cause more pain lol

ancient jacinth
#

wait

#

one sec

ruby ravine
#

lim x -> 0, (f(x + a) - f(x)) / a

#

if you are curious enough, evaluate this limit

#

after you have done so, you'll get a formula. Set that equal to 0, and the value of x you get is the value where minima's at

ancient jacinth
#

shouldnt it be lim x -> a (f(x) - f(a)) / x-a

ruby ravine
#

nope

ancient jacinth
ruby ravine
#

yeah

ancient jacinth
ruby ravine
#

oh woops, sorry

ancient jacinth
#

and thats f'(x)

ruby ravine
#

yeah, I meant, we can derive the general formula for derivative here, and put that equal to 0

sinful marsh
#

guys i go thx for your time

#

i will comeback when i learn derivatives

#

is the next thing i will learn at school

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @sinful marsh

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

ancient jacinth
#

W

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

manic slate
#

Let d be a metric on a non-empty set X. Define ρ as follows, for x, y ∈ X:
ρ(x, y) = min {1, d(x, y)} .

manic slate
#

Prove carefully that ρ is a metric on X.

#

so, I have done the first two steps

#

so proving ρ(x,y)=0 iff x=y

#

and the second proving ρ(x,y)=ρ(y,x)

#

but in proving ρ(x,z)<= ρ(x,y)+ρ(y,z), I ran into a bit of a problem

#

so I used the fact that d is already a metric, thus it satisfies all the criteria

#

so

#

I found that, putting it very rough.
ρ(x,z)<= min{1,d(x,y)+d(y,z)}

#

reason being because we already know that the triangle inequality holds for the metric d

#

The next logical step would be, in my opinion to split it

#

as

#

min{1,d(x,y)+d(y,z)}

#

=

#

min{1,d(x,y)}+min{1,d(y,z)}

#

and that would then conclude the proof

#

But I don't think you're allowed to do that.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@manic slate Has your question been resolved?

manic slate
#

<@&286206848099549185>

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@manic slate Has your question been resolved?

manic slate
#

<@&286206848099549185>

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@manic slate Has your question been resolved?

misty dagger
#

can u show triangle inequality now?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

night fossil
obtuse pebbleBOT
night fossil
#

Can someone fimd the An of this sequence

#

Its geometric

#

<@&286206848099549185>

#

I found it was geometric

#

But i dont know how to apply it

supple pumice
#

try separating the numerator and denominator as their own sequences

night fossil
#

Oh is it 2^n / 3^n

supple pumice
#

now simplify

night fossil
#

How to do that

supple pumice
#

i just mean to write it simpler

#

$\frac{2^n}{3^n} = \big(\frac{2}{3}\big)^n$

warm shaleBOT
#

please request a new nickname

supple pumice
#

do you know how to do this?

night fossil
#

Ah ok yes i know

#

Thank you for the help

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@night fossil Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @night fossil

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

proven zealot
#

why is c not correct

#

a number times a vector for example 5u is just legal I thought right?

kind hawk
#

here that dot specifically represents the dot product

#

not just normal scalar multiplication

#

but well they are being a bit strict

proven zealot
#

what is the difference?

#

with the dot and multiplicatioj?

kind hawk
#

in a) for example you could in theory also just define the norm of a number (which would then just end up being the absolute value)

#

well one is a dot product between vectors

#

and the other is scalar multiplication between scalar and vector

proven zealot
#

for that one I do understand it doesn't make sense

kind hawk
#

the first gives a number as result, the second gives a vector as result

proven zealot
#

u is a vector

#

v times w is a number right?

kind hawk
#

yes

#

so it would be the dot product of a vector and a number

#

which doesnt make sense

proven zealot
#

same for d I guess

#

I meant b

kind hawk
#

Yes

proven zealot
#

so for b it's like

#

a number

#
  • vector
#

ah okay I tihnk I got the hang of it now

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @proven zealot

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

proven zealot
obtuse pebbleBOT
civic zealot
#

what is example 1.9

proven zealot
#

this but

#

this is the previous chapter

#

I think I will skip this question the proof is like 2 pages

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @proven zealot

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

proven zealot
obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

reef adder
#

need help with this

obtuse pebbleBOT
wooden cipher
#

thats an equation

#

but

#

whats the question

reef adder
#

sorry

#

wasnt specific

#

i need to differintiate it

#

and simplify

robust sleet
#

Chainrule+product

reef adder
#

I know how to do it

#

however i get confused

#

when i need to factor

#

could you show me how i can factor it?

#

I found have it in the form f'(x)g(x)+f(x)+g'(x) already

#

Lmk if you can help

#

<@&286206848099549185>

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @reef adder

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

indigo coyote
#

I'm supposed to solve this using law of sines

indigo coyote
#

I'm not sure how to get the height using only a side and angle

#

<@&286206848099549185>

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@indigo coyote Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

left jetty
#

Can someone check if i did this right or not i dont have access to the answer sheet

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@left jetty Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

west sigil
#

Im a college freshman taking trigonometry, my highest level of math is very very basic algebra, (i failed alg1 and cheated through alg2 since i had very confusing and hard to understand teachers in high school, zoom learning didnt help either) and i have my first trigonometry exam tomorrow and trig concepts feels so alien to me, where can i start cramming knowledge and learn fast before i take my exam? im super lost

west sigil
#

this is the type of trig i need to get done

stable rain
#

ummmmmmm

#

thats a lot

#

start w khan academy

west sigil
#

this is the study guide^

stable rain
#

idk that seems to b the standard

west sigil
#

o

#

you think i can learn this much in less then a day?

stable rain
#

um

west sigil
#

the max i know is basic alg, simplifying square roots that kinda stuff

stable rain
#

idt im good at giving advice

#

TnT

#

i wld say its basic

#

maybe

#

but um

#

normally u ask specific questions u have here

#

do u have any specific Q u dont get

west sigil
#

bascially everything lol trig is a foreign concept to me

sonic anchor
#

you know unit circle?

stable rain
#

meeee?

#

uwu

west sigil
sonic anchor
#

unit circle is a circle with center in origin and radius 1

#

cos and sin are defined from the unit circle

west sigil
sonic anchor
#

every point in the circle will be $(cos(\theta),sin(\theta))$

warm shaleBOT
#

Køter

sonic anchor
#

where $\theta$ is the angle at that point

warm shaleBOT
#

Køter

west sigil
#

o

#

im very confused lol

stable rain
#

um

#

the x value u can get using tri

#

trig

#

ditto y value

stable rain
sonic anchor
#

so the x coordinate for that point is $x=cos(\theta)$ and the y coordinate $y=sin(\theta)$

stable rain
#

ay got ur own drawing

warm shaleBOT
#

Køter

sonic anchor
west sigil
#

o

#

you think khan academy has unit circles?

sonic anchor
#

yes they will also teach you it

#

you dont understand what we are saying or?

stable rain
#

khan academy has um

#

a lot of stuff

west sigil
sonic anchor
#

what specifically is confusing about the drawing i made

frosty spoke
#

honestly what you should probably do

#

if you have a few hours

#

is go watch all of the khan academy videos and do the exercises

stable rain
#

watch khan aca

west sigil
#

the numbers on the outside and the trig functions purpose

frosty spoke
#

but make sure to do it when you're not sleepy

#

you can't cram this stuff without the stuff from before

#

it just doesn't work very effectively

stable rain
sonic anchor
stable rain
#

sleep and eat well

sonic anchor
#

and the trig functions purpose is that when you have the point on the unit circle

#

the x coordinate will be cos(theta) and the y cooridnate will be sin(theta)

west sigil
frosty spoke
#

and like don't try to speedrun it

#

actually do it like you're trying to learn what's going on

frosty spoke
#

skip the stuff about conic sections or whatever

west sigil
frosty spoke
#

you need to start at the beginning

#

if that means it's algebra 1

#

then that's where you start

#

you start at somewhere where you have a good understanding of everything before

#

if you can't do place value or multiplication, start there

#

not saying that you'll manage to get everything 100%

#

but if there's something there, then you'll do immensely better at studying the stuff you need for the exam

#

so save like 4 hours before the exam, and spend the first two reviewing the exam subjects on khan academy, and then spend the next one making a "cheat sheet" paper that you write everything important you want to remember on the exam

#

and depending on the exam, if you're allowed to use it, then use it, if not then just toss it in the trash bin

west sigil
#

bet ill do my best, we are allowed only a ti83 or 84 and a sheet of paper thats all 😬

#

so bascically ima have to memorize all the trig functions 😢

frosty spoke
#

you don't really

west sigil
#

wdym

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@west sigil Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @west sigil

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

left jetty
#

I dont have access to the answer sheet can someone confirm if this is right or not?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@left jetty Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@left jetty Has your question been resolved?

left jetty
#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @left jetty

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

timid silo
#

hello

obtuse pebbleBOT
timid silo
#

can i get help with a pascal triangle question *

royal basin
timid silo
#

so yes?

#

well ill take it as a yes

#

“3rd term in expansion of (4m+1)^4”

royal basin
#

ok, so what's troubling you with this

timid silo
#

the 4m

#

wait i figured it out

#

nice

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @dense venture

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

shadow lava
obtuse pebbleBOT
shadow lava
#

I'm really confused with the associative property

#

I've got brackets where they're not supposed to be, and I'm not sure why

#

my version looks like everything in the numerator is being multiplied, but it's actually adding and subtracting everything in the first and third terms

#

did I mess up this part somehow?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@shadow lava Has your question been resolved?

royal basin
shadow lava
#

hmmm

shadow lava
#

and how to remove the brackets from the 1st and 3rd factors

royal basin
#

when you factor out (2x-3)^3 from

(40x+32)(2x-3)^3 - 20(20x-3)^4

you should have had:

(2x-3)^3 * [(40x+32) - 20(20x-3)]

#

but your (40x+32) got stuck outside

#

for no apparent reason, even an erroneous one

royal basin
shadow lava
#

that last term..

royal basin
#

bad sign

shadow lava
#

yeah

#

but after I distribute

#

am I supposed to remove the brackets?

royal basin
#

if you keep the parentheses on, it's
...[(40x+32)-(40x-60)]

shadow lava
royal basin
#

now it is good, except for a stray unmatched ) at the right which should be erased

shadow lava
#

that's OK too? or should I always keep the brackets on if I distribute

#

it sounds like the brackets are OK on or off, as long as I distribute correctly

#

if there are extra brackets they will go away with + - being the only operators left in the square brackets?

#

I think I'm finally starting to see it, but man this was challenging for me. I just need to double check on the brackets after distribution. Good practice to keep them?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

shadow lava
#

.reopen

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

shadow lava
dark stirrup
#

What is your question

royal basin
#

well, the work you've now done is correct

shadow lava
#

glad to see I finally found it

shadow lava
#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @shadow lava

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

true breach
#

Can I get explaination of how to go from step 1 to 2

supple granite
#

First they canceled the 2 on both sides

#

Since 162=81×2

#

Seems like they also multiplied 81 on both sides

#

To get rid of the denominator on the RHS

true breach
topaz loom
#

Divide by 2 on both sides

supple granite
#

They divided both sides by 2

true breach
#

That gives 1/81 tho

#

O wait

#

Nvm

topaz loom
#

Yeah

#

And then multiply by 81

true breach
supple granite
#

Right hand side

#

The right side of the =

true breach
#

Ok so what happened to the exponents

#

Idk how it went from n-1 to 1-n

topaz loom
#

I can explain that

true breach
#

Pls do

topaz loom
#

So generally

#

$$(1/n)^2$$ is the same as $$n^-2$$

warm shaleBOT
#

Bloxx12

true breach
#

N-2????

#

Isn't it n-1?

topaz loom
#

I cant use the tool sorry

true breach
#

O

topaz loom
#

But say we have (1/n)^2 for example

#

Any exponent works though

#

Then this is equal to n^-2

#

A negative exponent

true breach
#

Ohhhh

#

Ok I see what ur saying

topaz loom
#

And n-1 becomes -n+1

supple granite
#

Actually I think the RHS of the second line is wrong

#

It should be $3^{n-1}$

true breach
#

Maybe?

warm shaleBOT
topaz loom
#

No i dont think so

true breach
topaz loom
#

What about the 1/3?

supple granite
#

The LHS is 3^(1-n), but the RHS is 3^(n-1)

true breach
#

Oh yeah it changed

#

On the 3rd line

topaz loom
#

Oh wait what

topaz loom
supple granite
topaz loom
#

Pfff what the hell lol

true breach
#

OHHH WAIT

#

Ok I understand the (3)^n-1 now

topaz loom
supple granite
#

Elaborate

true breach
topaz loom
true breach
#

It would be 1/3 ^1-n then

supple granite
supple granite
true breach
#

Anyway what happened on the left side on 4th step

supple granite
#

81=3^4, right?

true breach
#

What

#

No like when 1-n goes into the brackets

supple granite
#

You can rewrite it as $(3^4)^2(3)^{1-n}$

warm shaleBOT
supple granite
warm shaleBOT
supple granite
#

Are you familiar with this rule

true breach
#

O

#

Ok isee

#

So

#

How come

true breach
supple granite
#

You can think of it as taking log_3 on both sides

true breach
#

Ok

supple granite
#

$Log_3{3^{8+1+n}}=8+1-n$

warm shaleBOT
supple granite
#

That way the 3 cancels and you're left with the exponents

true breach
#

Ok ty

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @true breach

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

timid silo
#

for the last couple of questions I plugged the x into the derivative equation and it worked fine but for these value looks like they plug into normal function. so when do I plug into function and when into derivative? (absolute minima and maxima on closed intervals)

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@timid silo Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@timid silo Has your question been resolved?

fiery birch
#

@timid silo

#

f(x) will be rising and reaching a maxima which is also a critical point as after that f(x) changes direction or is dropping in value

#

Try to see why this happens , plot f(x) and then see what happens to it before and after a critical point as well as at the critical point

#

Also remember that the derivative is the slope of the tangent you draw to a point

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

rain cove
obtuse pebbleBOT
rain cove
#

How do you do this?

dark stirrup
#

I do not believe there is an analytical solution

#

length of an ellipse, right?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@rain cove Has your question been resolved?

rain cove
#

It doesn't have to be an Analytical solution

#

<@&286206848099549185>

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@rain cove Has your question been resolved?

tough hull
#

What is interquartile range

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@rain cove Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@rain cove Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@rain cove Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@rain cove Has your question been resolved?

frosty spoke
obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

sudden leaf
#

so is ∫₃¹⁵ f(x) dx the same as ∫₃¹⁵ f(u) du

lost tree
#

yes the variable of integration doesnt matter

#

∫₃¹⁵ f(x) dx = ∫₃¹⁵ f(u) du

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@sudden leaf Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @sudden leaf

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

spare crypt
obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@spare crypt Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

trim star
#

hi

obtuse pebbleBOT
trim star
#

I was having trouble solving my washer method and don't know what's wrong with the steps I did. I have included the problem and my work

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@trim star Has your question been resolved?

trim star
#

<@&286206848099549185>

#

wait nvm it was right i just mistyped answer

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @trim star

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

white knot
#

Hello

obtuse pebbleBOT
patent jetty
#

JSUAT ASK

#

JUST

#

Ask

past tide
obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@white knot Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

proper oak
obtuse pebbleBOT
proper oak
#

Hey, im having a bit of trouble with this question, anybody mind helping me out

#

I simply don’t understand how I’d go about answering it, I’ve figured out the volume of the cake tin, but I’m a bit stuck.

past tide
#

u should first make sure the units can fit with each other in your calculations

#

volume over area would give you the depth, since water would fit the container

proper oak
#

Ok, i know the volume is 19,739.188cm cubed

past tide
#

what is the relationship between cm^3 and mm^3?

#

write it down

proper oak
#

A mm cubed is one one thousandth of a cm cubed correct?

past tide
#

hold on lemme calculate

#

1cm = 10mm

proper oak
#

And cubed we multiply by 10 3 times right

past tide
#

(1 cm)^3 = (10 mm)^3
1^3 cm^3 = 10^3 mm^3

#

yeapp ur correct

proper oak
#

So wait, should i multiply the area of the bottom by ml’s converted into cm cubed?

past tide
#

why multiply?

#

anyways u should convert mL to mm^3

#

or cm^3, whichever is more convenient

proper oak
#

That would be 200cm^3 then right since ml = cm^3

past tide
#

yes!

#

ok draw the shape of the water after it's poured

#

how do u get the length of the cylinder if you have its volume and top area?

proper oak
#

I know the diameter is 20cm, so the radius is 10cm, so the area is pi x r^2

past tide
#

yep

proper oak
#

And multiply that by the pi x diameter ( 20cm )

#

For volume

past tide
#

wait what

#

???

proper oak
#

The height would be pi x diameter

#

Height x area = volume

past tide
#

height = volume/area

#

= (volume of cylinder, which is the volume of water) / ( pi x r^2)

#

pi * diameter would be circumference????

proper oak
#

Oh wait yeah, and i don’t need height since I’d be using the depth of the water

#

As height

#

So how do i use the 200ml to find the height knowing that it’s filling a space with an area of 314.1592cm^2

proper oak
#

Can i convert ml’s to cm^2 or just cm^3 by the way?

#

Okay, i figured out, i had to turn the 200ml into 20,000cm^2, then divide that by the area of the circle, and then divide that answer by ten

#

To get mm’s

#

So thanks, i don’t need anymore help

past tide
#

not just volumes, areas, lengths, energy, whatever

proper oak
#

Ok

#

I was a bit confused cause I haven't done stuff like that in a while, I've stopped being taught some of the basics in exchange for more formulaic stuff which makes it hard to figure out stuff i don't know the formula for

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@proper oak Has your question been resolved?

proper oak
#

Yeah

#

Yes

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

bold siren
obtuse pebbleBOT
bold siren
#

hi I would like to ask how to do 7a without excel

worn karma
#

uhhh

thick gyro
bold siren
#

like the standard normal distribution table?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@bold siren Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @bold siren

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

lament estuary
#

I am struggling with finding this derivative using implicit differentiation. I get as far as the quotient rule but i am struggling with the algebra to solve for dy/dx.

I feel like i should have it but i cannot see the step i am missing.

high lily
#

for the initial applications of derivative rules, you can leave dy/dx as dy/dx

#

can you show what you've done so far?

lament estuary
#

Ill have to take a picture of my work using my phone. give me a minute please and ill post it.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@lament estuary Has your question been resolved?

lament estuary
#

I circled the area of algebra i was working with. I have only been working with the LHS because the RHS is pretty simple. It is just 2dy/dx.

In my pic here, the top left of my circled area is where i started and the rest is just me trying to find our where to go with my algebra.

#

(My algebra is wrong)

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

frail lake
#

hello

obtuse pebbleBOT
frail lake
#

i got a question

fierce lagoon
#

Specifically the first bullet point

frail lake
#

so when you convert to polar equation

#

do you solve for r?

fierce lagoon
#

Typically yeah

#

Depends if you're parameterizing

frail lake
#

can you give me an example when you dont?

fierce lagoon
#

Well one example is where if I were to find the hypervolume of y over a cylinder

frail lake
#

here wait I think I got one

#

x + 4y = 2

#

so I changed the x and y to rcos and rsin

fierce lagoon
#

I would let
x = rcos(θ)
y = rsin(θ)

Although r and theta are both parameters

frail lake
#

my teacher has put that as the answer

fierce lagoon
#

Yeah that's fine

frail lake
#

but why about the r?

#

wqhat*

#

what*

fierce lagoon
#

I mean if we wanna graph it on the polar plane

#

Then having r = something makes it jice

#

But if you're using polars to parameterize then you don't need to

frail lake
#

so leaving it as rcos + 4(rsin) = 2 is good if you want to convert to polar equation

fierce lagoon
#

You can still isolate r though

frail lake
#

hm

fierce lagoon
#

It'll be equivalent

#

I guess it doesn't really matter

frail lake
#

but then there is this problem y^2 = 3x

#

and she did solve for 4

#

r*

#

and she got r=3cot + csc

#

both questions are asking to convert to polar equation

fierce lagoon
#

Then isolate r

#

Well actually

#

Did she say equation or function?

frail lake
#

equation

fierce lagoon
#

You don't need to isolate r then I think

frail lake
#

ok

fierce lagoon
#

If you're not expected a function

frail lake
#

cool thank you

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @frail lake

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

sour fox
#

so the function g2(x):

obtuse pebbleBOT
sour fox
#

to show case that it is invertible my teacher did this:

#

basically, since the function is strongly increasing in the interval [-1, 4], this means it is invertible

gleaming ridge
sour fox
#

but my question is, cant we showcase for each value for x when -1 <= x <= 4 that each input has a unique output

sour fox
gleaming ridge
#

just unwind the definition of 1-1

#

(assuming the function is shown to be onto)

sour fox
#

i see

#

ok thanks 🙂

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @sour fox

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

stable vector
#

what the diff

obtuse pebbleBOT
tardy epoch
stable vector
#

no like what the diffrent between this two like any example of each one to see the diffrent

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@stable vector Has your question been resolved?

tardy epoch
#

you need to show the entire context for people to help you

stable vector
#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @stable vector

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

timid silo
obtuse pebbleBOT
static beacon
#

x^2+2x+2 = (x+1)^2

severe reef
timid silo
#

Hi, I have to evaluate the oblique asymptotes for this function

static beacon
#

oops

#

didnt see that

timid silo
#

What I have tried after evaluating the slope is to find where the asymptotes touch the y axis

#

So to do this I extracted x^2 from the square root and then I took x^2 from the numerator

#

$\lim_{x \to +\infty} \frac{x^2(4-\frac{8}{x} + \frac{4}{x^2})}{3x\sqrt{1+\frac{2}{x} + \frac{2}{x^2}}} - \frac{4}{3}x$

warm shaleBOT
#

FriedrichDN

timid silo
#

But actually the right decision was to multiply the square on both sides and then use Taylor after extracting x^2

#

I don’t get why this is correct

ancient jacinth
#

think of e^x for example

#

the taylor series for e^x is 1+x+x^2/2+x^3/3!+x^4/4!...

#

consider the graph of xe^(2/x)/2

#

you can look at the taylor series expansion of xe^(2/x)/2

#

e^x is 1+x+x^2/2+x^3/3!+x^4/4!...

e^(2/x) is 1+2/x +(2/x)^2/2+(2/x)^3/3!+(2/x)^4/4!...
xe^(2/x)/2 is x(1+2/x +(2/x)^2/2+(2/x)^3/3!+(2/x)^4/4!...)/2

#

xe^(2/x)/2 = x/2+1 +x(2/x)^2/4+x(2/x)^3/12+x(2/x)^4/48...

#

as x goes to infinity, the other terms get smaller and smaller

#

you get left with x/2+1

#

which is what the oblique asymptote approaches

#

so using the taylor series helps

timid silo
#

But why I can’t just multiple for the square root and then extract x^2

#

All the times everyone comes up with an example and doesn't say why my opinion is wrong

#

And I end up with a checklist of things to not do instead of getting why

#

<@&286206848099549185>

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@timid silo Has your question been resolved?

timid silo
#

Maybe I understand why

#

The numerator it’s ok

#

But brutally simply the denominator with 1 is not right because its like using the first order of Taylor expansion

#

Of the denominator

#

So the approximation is not good

#

So actually the idea is to extract what I can and then see if this lead me to a 0 caused by a bad approximation

#

If that’s true I have to take the next order Taylor expansion

#

<@&286206848099549185> am I right?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@timid silo Has your question been resolved?

timid silo
#

<@&286206848099549185>

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@timid silo Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

timid silo
#

im very new to induction, i have a proof for Consider a chessboard of size 2n ×2n for some arbitrary positive integer n. Remove any square
from the board. Is it possible to tile the remaining squares with L-shaped triominoes could i walk someone through it

timid silo
#

im not entirely sure its correct

#

om charbit

#

my saviour

#

okay so the base case would be

#

n = 1

#

meaning that our board is 2 x 2

#

and we know that without loss of generality

#

we can place the L piece anywhere

#

because it can be oriented

#

and we can choose the orientation based on the missing tile

#

for our inductive hypothesis

#

Assume 2^n x 2^n is true, and show that 2^n+1 x 2^n +1 is also true

#

im pretty sure you need to divide your board into 4 coordinates

#

the idea is to apply the inductive hypothesis on the 4 quadrant

#

i have a drawing

#

actually no im wrong

#

i dont know : c

unreal musk
#

[I'm not actually super sure how you'd do it, but wanted to check over what you had happyCat]

#

Hmmm it is a question though catscream

#

I mean the subdivision thing seems like a good idea, but then if you remove just one square, while the quadrant you removed it from, you can do the induction hypothesis on

#

For the others, you'd still be "full", and so there's no guarantee you can tile those ones, is there? glassescat

timid silo
#

you cant pick where the missing tile will be but you can choose specific missing tiles in the other coordinate such that you know you are able to fill it in based on the inductive hypothesis?

unreal musk
#

Hmm I was thinking along those lines, you can't choose where the removed one would be sure, and of course you could remove more so that you can use the induction hypothesis on those...

#

Oh, what about at the "centre"?

timid silo
#

oh thats what my original drawing had

unreal musk
#

I was thinking that for the ones that don't have the missing tiles, remove a tile from the "centre" and then you'd be able to induction hypothesis to cover those, and then clearly you can cover the "removed" three with another L

#

[I had that typed out already haha]

#

Does that not work? sad_think

timid silo
#

like for the ones that dont have missing tiles

unreal musk
#

That was my thought, and it seems to me to work, right?

timid silo
#

it should work based on the base case?

#

i mean i know you use the inductive hypothesis but

frosty spoke
#

oh no it's dopamine

#

how's the chaotic university life going

timid silo
#

dont laught at my pain

#

terrible

#

i hate my university

#

we are programming something to covert pre to postfix with stacks and queues and i want to kms

frosty spoke
#

LMFAOOO

#

they ask that in interview questions too

timid silo
#

uh wdym

#

i dont mind programming i just procrastinated and so now im suffering, but i only procrastinate because my courseload is terrible and my c class is not the only class im trying to pass

frosty spoke
#

like they ask the prefix to postfix notation

timid silo
#

dude i also had to like turn a queue into a dictionary to have precidence of values in the queue

#

i had to implement a postfix calculator

#

whcih wasnt that bad

#

non eof this is bad uh i just procrastinated and im using a late day

frosty spoke
#

sounds horrible LOL

#

anyway

#

for your problem

timid silo
#

uh yeah

#

right

#

the point is to leave the center part emtpy for any quadrant not containing the tile

#

?

frosty spoke
#

no

#

does this help

timid silo
#

thats what i said

frosty spoke
#

oh well

timid silo
#

so you have to sa

#

say

#

Assume 2^n x 2^n is true

#

right

frosty spoke
#

yes

#

assume that you can find a tiling for any board of size 2^n

timid silo
#

let me show

#

i dont know how to word the center thing

#

because technically this has four cases

#

based on the quadrant, what needs to be left empty is

#

okay i guess id have to state all of them actually

#

no?

unreal musk
#

Can just assume without loss of generality no?

#

The cases for the others, you'd argue almost identically

timid silo
#

uh i dont know how to word that the tiles we choose to be empty should be the ones facing the center if that makes any sense

#

this part

unreal musk
#

As for wording it thinkies depends on how exactly they would want you to state it I think

#

Thoughts for extra clarity would be to "coordinates" it, if you get what I mean? But then that might be a bit overkill

unreal musk
# timid silo

Part of me feels that stating something like this is "obvious", but then it might not be thonkHang

#

"for the quadrants that do not have a missing tile, remove the tile that is closest to the centre. We can then use the induction hypothesis to deduce that the remaining tiles in those three quadrants can be tiled, and on returning those tiles, we will have an L shape that can be covered by a triomino" or something like that

timid silo
#

also unrelated but what is the purpose of the base case

#

might be a bad q, just want to make sure i understand fs

frosty spoke
#

basically if you don't know the base case is true

#

and only the inductive case

#

it doesn't prove that everything is true

#

the classic example of this is "all cars are the same colour" or variants of that

unreal musk
#

For example, "for all positive integers n, we have n > n + 1" or something

timid silo
#

i think im also confused about the inductive case

frosty spoke
timid silo
#

like where is the inductive case derived from

#

like idk in cs, recursion is basically assuming your code works

#

is this the same thing

frosty spoke
#

and then say that piece 1 has a gap in its bottom left, piece 2 has a gap in its top right, piece 3 has a gap in its top left

frosty spoke
#

and also say WLOG, assume that the missing corner is the top right or something

timid silo
#

is induction recursion, or is recursion induction

frosty spoke
#

hmm it's more like

frosty spoke
#

because you can always rotate it so the missing corner is in the top right

#

you can show that recursion works with induction

#

like given a recursive algorithm, you can show via induction that it works

timid silo
frosty spoke
#

no rotate the whole thing

#

you can formalize this a little bit more

timid silo
#

is that even necessary?

frosty spoke
#

not really, it's pretty obvious that there's rotational symmetry

unreal musk
frosty spoke
#

but if you're dealing with someone who's really hard with the logic, you can say that we'll show there exists an arrangement for the top right corner

#

and then by rotating everything, we now have an arrangement for the bottom left corner

timid silo
#

also how do you usually end these proofs

frosty spoke
#

the rest of the proof is left as an exercise to the grader

timid silo
#

:/ gonna pull that on my programming

frosty spoke
#

pro gaming

#

in all seriousness, I usually wrap up inductive proofs with something like, "since we have proven P(base case) and that for all n, P(n) implies P(n+1), we conclude that P(n) is true for all natural numbers >= base case"

#

but you could also end it with AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA THIS MAJOR SUCKS

timid silo
unreal musk
#

"I swear down, if you say this proof is wrong, gaaah"

frosty spoke
#

you should probably say somewhere that n >= 1

#

actually no

#

it works for n = 0 too

timid silo
#

it does but its stupid to use n = 0

frosty spoke
#

looks fine

unreal musk
#

Yea I'm happy with it personally happyCat

frosty spoke
#

oh wait there's a typo at the top

#

the chessboard is 2^n x 2^n

#

not 2nx2n

timid silo
#

oh shoot yeah

#

latex moment

#

i just do it for that extra one point

frosty spoke
#

need all the points you can get before the grades go into a dumpster fire next year

#

and it becomes dopamine the business major

timid silo
#

ha my grades already in the dumster fire now

timid silo
#

my tuition too expensive for me to not study cs

frosty spoke
#

sounds like asian parents

timid silo
#

im actually white

#

HAHAHAHA

frosty spoke
#

or cs

timid silo
#

i told you many times that i like cs

#

i just am not good at this because ive never done it before

timid silo
#

im not some quitter

#

plus

#

math majors freak me out

frosty spoke
#

same honestly

timid silo
#

poh shen loh lovers

#

oh yeah se induction to prove for any n ∈ N, any set with exactly n-many distinct elements has
exactly 2^n-many distinct subsets. also confuses me

#

my math major friend was trying to explain but uh

#

i did not understand it at all

frosty spoke
#

so basically this amounts to expressing the subsets of the (n+1) set in terms of those of the n set

#

does that make sense so far?

timid silo
#

n + 1 is what we are trying to prove

#

inductive is just 2^n

frosty spoke
#

right

#

so consider the subsets of the (n+1) set

#

actually let's do a more concrete example

#

the subsets of the set {1, 2} are:

{}
{1}
{2}
{1, 2}

and the subsets of the set {1,2,3} are:
{}
{3}

{1}
{1, 3}

{2}
{2, 3}

{1, 2}
{1, 2, 3}

#

and I wrote them in that order to sorta help you figure out the pattern here

#

do you see how the subsets of the set {1, 2} each correspond to two of them of {1, 2, 3}?

timid silo
#

its half and half

frosty spoke
#

wdym

timid silo
#

for instance

#

in {1, 2, 3} 3 is in half of the subsets

frosty spoke
#

well yeah

#

so differently stated, you can take each of the subsets of {1, 2}, and you have two choices to make a subset of {1, 2, 3} by either including 3 or not, right?

timid silo
#

correct

frosty spoke
#

so you might say that there are twice as many subsets of {1, 2, 3} as {1, 2} right?

timid silo
#

yes

frosty spoke
#

does that help you prove the inductive case?

timid silo
#

uhh uwehuhudhuhudshufhudhfushfuh

#

wait so firstly the base case is just 2^1 right

frosty spoke
#

do you define the natural numbers to include 0

timid silo
#

unfortunately yes

#

oh shoot if orgot

#

yeah

#

0 is a natural number

#

thats dumb

frosty spoke
#

so then your base case has to be n=0, because you need to prove it for all natural numbers

#

unless you want to add in the extra bit that says it also holds for n=0 somewhere else

timid silo
#

no

frosty spoke
#

I remember all of my CS profs defined N to include 0 and all of my math profs said no

#

weird that way

timid silo
#

its not weird

#

everything in cs starts with 0

#

in math, 0 isnt even a real number to my knowledge

#

like

frosty spoke
#

especially your grades 😩

timid silo
#

its just 0

frosty spoke
timid silo
#

i wish my school had grade inflation

#

dude at berkley you can fail all ur midterms and STILL GET A B IN THE CLASS

frosty spoke
#

surely your classes are curved right?

timid silo
#

no

#

absolutely not

frosty spoke
#

I remember getting a B- in a machine learning class despite totally failing the exams and messing up the final project LOL

timid silo
#

: c : c im gonna be a systems person

frosty spoke
frosty spoke
timid silo
#

im now confident i will eventually be good at this math stuff

#

i just need to work hard or whatever

#

idk

frosty spoke
#

yea you should be

#

eventually you get better

timid silo
#

uh okay so the base case is the empty set right

frosty spoke
#

I sucked at it compared to the math majors

#

yeah the base case is n=0, which corresponds to the empty set

timid silo
#

i stay away from real math majors

frosty spoke
#

I got peer pressured into going into hard math classes by my math major friends

#

got absolutely destroyed

#

I still don't even know how to solve a PDE despite having failed a class in it

timid silo
#

Assume that any set will have $2^n$ distinct elements and show that any set will also have $2^{n + 1}$ distinct elements.

warm shaleBOT
#

dopamine

timid silo
#

AY

#

WHAT

frosty spoke
#

the fking prof literally starts the first lecture with some Lagrangian mechanics

timid silo
#

IT TRANSLATES LATEX/

frosty spoke
#

any set with n elements will have 2^n subsets

frosty spoke
timid silo
#

Assume that any set with n elements will have $2^n$ distinct subsets and show that any set n + 1 elements will also have $2^{n + 1}$ distinct subsets.

warm shaleBOT
#

dopamine

timid silo
#

wait this is so fun

#

if i knew tis was a thing i woulda just made all my questions in latecx

#

latex is like vim

frosty spoke
#

and hard to use

timid silo
#

no

#

vim is great

unreal musk
#

You didn't know that there was $\LaTeX$ here?

warm shaleBOT
#

@unreal musk

timid silo
#

uh i knew but i didnt know it just parses discord messages into atex

timid silo
frosty spoke
#

the fact that it's {1, 2} really has no bearing

#

like it could have 1000 elements

#

well actually you have to do it in a little bit reversed order

#

so let's say I have a set of 1001 elements

#

I trim off the last element, call it THE_LAST_ELEMENT

#

now I have a set of 1000 elements, which we'll call B = A \ {THE_LAST_ELEMENT}

#

the subsets of A are precisely the disjoint union of {all subsets of B} and {all subsets of B with THE_LAST_ELEMENT added on}

#

you can show rather quickly that both of these have 2^1000 elements by the inductive hypothesis

#

also if you don't feel like working with arbitrary sets, you could insert a short remark about how we can convert these to {1, ... n} by counting, but not sure if your TA will like that

timid silo
#

we didnt learn counting yet

frosty spoke
timid silo
frosty spoke
#

wdym

#

why's it weird

timid silo
#

i think i get what youre saying

#

{all subsets of B with THE_LAST_ELEMENT added on}

#

wdym here

frosty spoke
#

like added on means put into the subset

#

so for example, we name a subset of {1, 2, 3} like {1, 3}

#

this is just {1} with 3 added into it

timid silo
#

right

frosty spoke
#

or maybe I should say it this way: all subsets of A can be classed into two disjoint classes

#

those that contain THE_LAST_ELEMENT and those that don't

timid silo
#

disjoint meaning only UNIQUE elements

frosty spoke
#

disjoint means that they don't overlap

#

and if you remove all of the THE_LAST_ELEMENT from those that contain it, then they're just the subsets of B

#

obviously these sets don't necessarily have orders, so you can't really say something is the "last" one, but any choice of element will work

timid silo
#

i hate this

#

actually my brain is hurting

frosty spoke
#

"i love cs" -- dopamine 2023

#

"we didn't learn counting yet"

timid silo
#

this isnt programming

frosty spoke
#

hmm okay do you want a programming analogy for this

#

maybe that'll help you understand the logic

timid silo
#

yes

frosty spoke
#

so imagine that you have a set {a, b, c, d}

timid silo
#

oml okay

frosty spoke
#

the subsets can be represented as the binary numbers from 0 to 15:
0000
0001
0010
...
1111

timid silo
#

twos complement

frosty spoke
#

where to get from a binary number to the set, you just take each digit and use that to say whether the thing is in there

frosty spoke
timid silo
#

hahah ik

#

python doesnt use twos complement

frosty spoke
#

basically you construct a subset as follows:
do I include a? (2 choices)
do I include b? (2 choices)
...

frosty spoke
#

and this makes 16 choices

timid silo
#

basically in {1, 2, 3} if we take 3, half of the subsets will include 3 and half wont

frosty spoke
#

yes

#

and the half that don't are precisely the subsets of {1, 2}

timid silo
#

yes

frosty spoke
#

so by equality of the halves, the total is twice the number of subsets of {1, 2}

#

for a set of size n+1, and an arbitrary element a picked out of it, half of the subsets will contain a, and half won't

timid silo
#

yes

#

yes

#

yes