#help-10
1 messages · Page 134 of 1
CrEpasPmkinPie
no its 3 i just forgot to change it
~Martin
yea
~Martin
let me send another one
$\log_{x\sqrt{x}}(y)$
CrEpasPmkinPie
wait
~Martin
do we have it?
$\log_y x=\frac{1}{3}\Leftrightarrow y^{1/3}=x\Leftrightarrow y=x^3$
~Martin
i dont think this is the answer
ok
we can now substitute that into what we want
if we substitute it in we get
$\log_{x\sqrt{x}}y=\log_{x\sqrt{x}}x^3$
~Martin
do you know how to go from here on?
👍
can i ask another question
No. Only 1 question per life time. Come again when you're reincarnated
Closed by @raven portal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.Reopen
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
assuming we're meant to look at the yellow bit, yes
Closed by @timid moss
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is my solution correct?
,w 6/(x-3) < 5
yes
Closed by @static fulcrum
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed due to the original message being deleted
.close
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is there any way to simplify A'b + cb'
Boolean algebra
no
@bright python Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help using a simple decomposition theorem to integrate a polynomial fraction
Where I get lost is the 1 = (A+B+C)*x^3 + (3A + 4B + C + D)x^2 and so on because I have no clue how to determine what expressions to use as coefficients for the powers of x
As in, I have no idea where 3A+4B+C+D came from
multiply out the previous expression
and collect the x^2, the x and the constant terms
not sure what else to say
you multiply out (x-1)(x+^2)A+x(x+2)^2B+....
and then collect the terms
Closed by @meager zealot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i need some help rn with this question
first of all how does my graph look?, and my working
secondly, the points of (-2,b) and (a,1) dont plot on my curve, so idk if ive done this correctly
i have a MS but i dont wanna see it rn otherwise im gonna see the answer straight away from the graph, wanna seek assistance first
@silver plover Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
I think that your graph looks fine and the working looks good
The intersection point of the red lines is (-2,1)
So (-2, a) are the points above and below the crossed intersection lines
And there are no points to the right and left parts on the graph so there are no points where y=1
@silver plover
The label -2 and 1-sqrt(2) are in the wrong places in your diagram
how come
This tells you about where -2 should go
how is it the intersection point of the red lines?
The point (-2, 1-sqrt2) should lie on the hyperbola
It's the turning point of the bottom branch of the curve
but than it would go above the intersection of the oblique asymptote with the y axis
which wouldnt make sense
the red line
You compare the values
1-sqrt(2)
And the intersection of the line with the y axis
That helps to see if the turning point is above or below
Which is 1-2sqrt(2/3)
also how do u know the -2 point is the turning point?
It's going to be the point nearest to the intersection of the asymptotes
As the curve comes up then goes down
Since it's symmetric
We know it must be at -2
yh i mean
i dont think ive done this accurately at all
icl
but what do u think
You want to come up closer to the asymptotes
ive messed up this point there, 3-2sqrt6 / 3 is larger than 1-sqrt2
You can draw you asymptotes first so that they have more distance in the y axis
With a sharper looking gradient
It still works as long as the turning point is between zero and that value
ight kl yh
these r hard to sketch man
main thing is
ive pretty much sketched it to a decent level
just less rounded
Yeah exactly and you can also draw it closer to the asymptotes for this particular question
heres the MS btw
They haven't thought about the turning point as deeply as you have done
ye i noticed
ye, as u said
not rounded
well i was too rounded
would my sketch have been good enough
in an exam
u reckon?
par the roundness
Yeah I think so, just add the intersection point of the lines as a coordinate just incase it's worth a mark
perfect
cheers mate
.close
Closed by @silver plover
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi im working through differential equations. Why do we multiply by P-knot at the last line?
Closed by @vast locust
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I am confused on this. Am I supposed to calculate the answer with just 9.8 and pi/3 or am I somehow supposed to keep the m/s^2 and use degrees? I am confused on what to use as the variables.
If anyone can tell me what to google I would extremely appreciate it a lot.
@graceful quail Has your question been resolved?
Hopefully this is how you would solve it unless I put in the wrong variables which is what I am worried about.
@graceful quail Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
When writing a proof would replacing "so" with the implies arrow be a valid use of it? "a < b, so b - a > 0"
Would replacing "so" with an equal sign be valid?
as in they're equal statements
what's the nicest way to write this type of thing in a proof?
"so" is best
equal sign is inappropriate
you can use "so", "then", "thus", "hence", "therefore", ...
ok and when is the implies arrow used?
as in in a formal proof you would literally write "implies"?
oh so they are synonymous
how about the use of the arrow inside of a predicate statement?
A Computer Science portal for geeks. It contains well written, well thought and well explained computer science and programming articles, quizzes and practice/competitive programming/company interview Questions.
is the arrow there still interchangeable with words?
sure
oh I mean same thing I guess
but it's more common to use arrows
because you're working with some sort of symbolic system
when discussing predicate logic you'll typically keep it as arrows and logical operators'
like you'd write $P \land Q \implies R$
maximo
but if you're writing a proof it is probably best to use words
Closed by @rancid wagon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i don't get how this happened
how what happened
why did they add +1
and how did it change rs/st and rv/uv - > rt/st and ru/uv
i get that
they did so to write it as st/st and uv/uv
rs + st = rt
the line segment from r to s + the line segment from s to t = the line segment from r to t
so the S's cancel out?
yes true
so what does that mean? i know that's what makes up RT but how did the letters change
okay so in this do the S's cancel out or something? i'm not sure how the letters change
sure, but only if they are in a straight line
again
notice how they are equal
RS + ST = (S-R) + (T-S) = T - R = RT
@west bone Has your question been resolved?
back, so how were the two S's taken if there's a different letter taking from it?
S-R = RS
how
im so confused lmao
where did the subtraction come from?
okay so to keep it in simple terms, when this happens, the same letters cancel out?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do you find the size of ADC?
hint: ABCD is a cyclic quadrilateral
what have you tried for that
another way to put it would be to solve the equation
Y’know I don’t wanna say this
But
I
don’t have a clue
Okay
So solve the equation is like
Uh
There are 2 xs?
So
first try rid yourself of fractions and variables in the denominator (using the appropriate multiplication)
that's one way to do it
I’m not good at thinking
Okay
But
would -x do ;-;
Not really
Okay
Help
oh wait
I might have done something
I still don’t know though
@timid silo Has your question been resolved?
Somebodydyydydydydyydydydyydd
Cause
It’s not getting the correct answers
Honestly man I don’t even know why this is so hard
I got the aswerR
Closed by @inner torrent
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help with the problem of the week for waterloo's cemc
I was wondering if I was correct?
Here's my solution:
We know that, before the removal of the dot, the chance of picking a card that is even/odd would be 3:6.
Afterwards, some guy comes, and then removes a dot, we then gain two probabilities which are:
4:6 (if the dot is removed from an even card)
2:6 (if the dot is removed from an odd card)
We can then combine these two statistics;
(3/6)(4/6) + (3/6)(2/6) = 1/2
Therefore, there's a 50-50% chance of that person getting an odd card.
@blissful marlin Has your question been resolved?
it's the total probability of getting an odd card
I don't think it's 50/50
why
maybe it is
but seems wrong
there are more dots on the odd cards
odd cards are more likely to lose a dot
well we don't know what card loses a dot actually
3/6 is true if there's no removal of the dot
whichever dot is removed, it's not longer 3/6
then that even card becomes odd
ok but that's also false
P(drawing odd) = P(drawing odd | odd card loses a dot, becomes even) P(odd card loses a dot) + P(drawing odd | even card loses a dot, becomes odd) P(even card loses a dot)
out of 27 dots 12 are on even cards
so 12/27 is probability of even card becoming odd
there's just nothing 3/6 about it nowhere
the 3/6 comes from how 27 dots are equally likely to be removed
it's a 50% chance of a 50% that one card becomes even or odd
I've asked others, I also got another solution as well if you are willing to check that
"So there are 27 dots with 12(2,4,6) dots belonging to even cards and 15(3,5,7) belonging to odd cards. So 12/27*4/6 + 15/27*3/6 which is some number thats not 0.5"
ohhh fcck wrong number its 2/6 still not 0.5
dot, we then gain two probabilities which are:
4:6 (if the dot is removed from an even card)
i think ur wrong cuz ur not treating the uniform choice from 27 dots properly
Here's the convo
sure
that's my opinion too
an even card becomes odd 12/27, otherwise an odd card becomes even
so, 27 dots, that's like 12/27 are even, and 15/27 belong to odd - so then we multiply them by the ratios?
you're just asking multiple people, weighting their responses by the amount of math they say, and using that to come to the answer
it's not interesting
I've asked the tutor and they came up with a different answer...
Which is what I came up as well.
ugh why doesn't waterloo just put the answers after posting the question
If you'd like, I can DM you the answer when it comes out
no, i'm confident
alright, thanks for the help!
@blissful marlin Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @blissful marlin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I do part b?
use part a
How?
where?
your work is really small maybe enlargen it? 
@timid silo Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
divides
"9 is divisible by 6 • x"?
How does he get to 3 | x
For a number to be divisible, it has to have two (or more) factors of 3, right?
so, there's only a semantic difference?
I guess you can say so
@hot dawn Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello! I am Syed (Panzer).
For the sake of this question, I want you to think of me as a person who doesn't know any mathematics at all. (This is not true but will help me get the answer i want here.)
I want to learn mathematics from the absolute beginning, where i learn something and use what i have learnt to learn something else. Kind of like building on top of knowledge and expanding it.
What i need is a "roadmap" to accomplish this task.
While i don't think its possible to have a roadmap that covers all of mathematics, i just want enough math that i can turn it into a hobby and understand basic and advanced formal, natural and social science concepts.
http://khanacademy.org/ perhaps?
@slender venture Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @slender venture
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello
.close
Closed by @faint ore
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@strong aspen Has your question been resolved?
@strong aspen Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
both have the same answer
right?
,w lim x to infinity cos(3x)
then the same
the other equation has cos too
if the limit does not exist algebra of limits is not allowed
so you cannot split it up like that
Because multiplication can make limits exist
Lim as x goes to 0 of 1/x does not exist, but lim as x goes to x of x*1/x = 1 is 1
i dont understand
$\lim_{x\to 0} \frac{1}{x}$ DNE
ΣAC
But $\lim_{x \to 0}\left(x\cdot \frac{1}{x}\right) = \lim_{x \to 0} 1 = 1$
ΣAC
this isnt my problem
this is
shouldnt both be undefined
cuz cos ~( inf ) = dne
it is, you splitted 1st one into two limits while condition I've just send doesn't hold
so i cant split?
this isnt my problem anyways
my problem is with evalating
evaluating
the limit
1st one is DNE, 2nd is 0, why do you think result should be same?
can be solved by squeeze theorem
Modus
1st one is like 0 + DNE -> DNE
@late flare Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I don't know where to start(((
@stark hollow Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
Do you have any context to where this question was given?
Like any properties or topic you did beforehand before this topic
I would approach by considering constraints (which is 'cheating' since it relies on the fact the question should have 1 answer)
However, this can still hint you towards the intended solution
this question is from the book called zambak 7 geometry
hmm i think it does not have a property for this 
how can i do it?
options for them btw
Think about whether this question needs CE to be some fixed value
Like does it actually constrain CE?
(and BD)
This at least hacks an answer out
@stark hollow Has your question been resolved?
Did you understand my hint?
can you please clarify it?
i did this but i can't really prove it
I'm claiming that diagram isn't actually fixed.
Ah ok, that's one choice
There's an easier choice for BD = CE = ? though
If you want to carry on with this approach, extend a perpendicular from D to line AC
I also advise drawing your own diagrams for geometry in general
for this
i get an equation of
12 for y and 6 for x is an answer
but there are others depending on what x is
You could find x in terms of y of course
i doubt you have to go as far as cosine rule for this
WAIT I GOT IT
there
SAS congruency
therefore AD=DF=6sqrt3
ah very nice

Im stealing this question.
So what I was hinting at before was that you could set these lengths to be 0 and get an answer
i spread it to another server
like a virus
WOOOW OMGGG
lmao the geometry virus
THANK YOU SO MUCH GUYS!!!

it takes a bit of time before you realise that AB and BD have no set length

so @balmy mortars method would be the quickest
since setting BD to 0 will make the ? side, the same as the equalateral triangle of 6sqrt(3)
At least it makes you realise ADE is probably isosceles
and that might hint you the right construction
Before realising the answer is 6sqrt3 ?
I mean...
Under some manipulations you probably would have guessed it is isos already
I think jay guessed that before
yeah i just tried to prove that it was isos
@stark hollowi think you forgot to .close
.close
Closed by @stark hollow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Modus
Closed by @pine oxide
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed due to the original message being deleted
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
when (2n+3) divides (5n^2 - 9)
Yeah... I tried alot
But how am I supposed to do that
I tried factoring the numerator
But still didn't got much
show what you did, I might be able to help
Okay
It's quite messy
So I am writing again
1 min plz
This is one of the ways I tried to approach
I was thinking the same
But realized it didn't work
I wrote a small code and seems like 2n+3 divides n^2 only when n=3
Then what to do....
I don't think this is a mathematical proof
what we can do is assume that n^2/(2n+3) = k then simplify
hm...
we should get a quadratic in n
what are we gonna do with this ratio again?
n^2 = k(2n + 3), simplify and get a quadratic equation in n
to find out n lol
Oh....
use quadratic formula
Fine....
Let me
See
Here
Oops
A minor mistake
I forgot k
Now its better
K is already a variable
What now
yeah, so now k should be such that (k^2 + 3k) > 0
and (k^2 + 3k) must be a perfect square
hm....
In other words root of this value should be natural
How are we going to determine that?
That this is a perfect square?
I think we are making this complicated
But I trust u
Do you know the divide sign?
U mean?
I mean like 2|4
oh....ya
Means 2 fully divides 4
2 divides 4
Yup
Using the divide sign this question is quite not that hard in fact
2n+3 divides the numerator
You want 2n+3| 5n^2-9 right
Then you recall, if a|b then a|b+ka
I think so too but I can't think of any other way to do this
But the result must always be natural
for k being a integer, can you see why?
Wow😮
The trick here is that you want something to cancel out the n^2, because its hard to deal with so you do the following
I have a doubt
About this
since 2n+3| 5n^2-9
Hmm?
Okok
Since this is true
This is also true
2n+3|(5n^2-9)x2
You multiply it by 2, ill explain later why
Let me be clear, our objective is to find all values of n such that f(n) is natural
Is that "x" a multiplication sign?
Yes
Okay
its obvious that if a|b this means a|kb for k integer
Oh okay
And now , to get rid of the n^2 we do the following trick
From this
Hm...
Btw this just means -18-15n after dividing 2n+3 is an integer ( could be negative),
But we need positive Right?
Yup I will get to that later
Fine...
Just know that this is true
Then heres the thing, we know managed to get rid of the n^2 here right
It should be i guess
We can actually apply the same trick to get rid of our -15n
Yeah...
Okay....
Then we use the same trick , we have
2n+3|-36-30n+15(2n+3)
hm...
I think we should be able to prove that k^2 + 3k = k(k + 3) is a perfect square only when k=3. Then we're done
Which then we would have 2n+3 | 9
And then its simple from there, it means 2n+3 must be a factor of 9
Other?
But 9 only has factors 1 3 9
yep
Yup so 3 is the only number
hm...
This is basic number theory, wait a second I can send a document
Thank you very much🥹
This is basic olympiad number theory, which covers these kind of divisibility questions
You sure I won't be able to find any other natural number no matter what I do right?
Yup
wow...then good
I am still not completely able to digest this but got the intuition i guess
Nice, the way using equations is also doable, but its much complicated than this once you get the hang of divisibility rules
We can get worse questions than these right?
Urm, depends,
I will try writing this in notes.
I feel like question is easier when the degree is less
As you can see the general idea to solve these kind of problems is to reduce the power on the RHS
Yup, so thats why we use
if a|b then a|b+ka
okay.......
I have another one now...
Let n be a natural number
n+5 is a perfect square
And n-11 is also a perfect square
Then how many possible values of n are there?
Considering n is natural
Urm for this you can just try values of n, and then to prove there arent other cases, just note the gaps between squares get bigger as the numbers get large
hm....
Obviously n>11, trying n=12,15,20… you notice for n=20 this works
Also we picked n=12,15,20 because this guarantees n-11 is a square
Then to prove there arent any other possible n
You notice the gaps between consecutive squares
Ie
Wait wait....
How is 20-11 a perfect square?
n should obey both equations simultaneously
Urm its 9?
Oh lol
Sorry my bad
Also 20+5 is 25
I can't argue this
So to prove there arent any other n, you notice the difference between squares,
(k+1)^2-k^2 = 2k+1
But then you notice to for k being like >=14
n+5 and n-11 cannot be both perfect squares,
Why? Because the gaps between squares are like at least 29 numbers apart
But n+5 and n-11 reaches a gap less than that,
Hm...
Thus by just checking for those squares, you can just brute force the rest
So what you basically mean is....
Just find some numbers by hit and trail first
And you will probably not be needing to go more than 14-15
Actually for k>=8 this is already enough
Then, prove that the numbers you got are the only possible values
Yup
By noticing the gaps between squares grow too large for any n to even exist there
Do you understand this? Or should I give an easier example
Please do
Urm a simpler question would be like
Find all naturals n, such that n-1 and n+2 are both perfect squares
You can immediately see that n=2 works
But how do you prove that other n do not work?
You notice likes the gaps between squares
Like 1 and 4, the gap is 3
4 and 9 the gap is 5
9 and 16 the gap is 7
Right
Ya....
The gap keeps growing
But n-1 and n+2 only has like a gap of 3
Therefore it cannot be other squares because their gap is too large
lol
Okay...let me try
Alrighty
lets say....
n+5 and n-4 are perfect squares
Then...
I have to do hit and trail
Since 4 and 5 are small numbers I have to look around small numbers
So I found that the only number is 20
Then I have to prove that there is no other number other that 20
Yup
Here....
Oh!!
I got something
Here, I can see that the gap between those two perfect squares should be 9
And it is impossible to have a gap lesser than 9 once the numbers start going above 25
So this means 5 is the only way
Thank you
I think I am done
U helped alot
@lean ember Has your question been resolved?
Yes
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
pretty straight forward but isn't this right?
I did
x/360 * 2pi(4.5)=1
And solve for x
2/9?
yes
but that's in radians
it asks for degrees
which would be 12.7, no?
huh thats rly strange
@plucky patio Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @plucky patio
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do you do this
Power of a point
Aah
What is that
In elementary plane geometry, the power of a point is a real number that reflects the relative distance of a given point from a given circle. It was introduced by Jakob Steiner in 1826.
ALR
@timid silo Has your question been resolved?
lol
PB is currently unknown you can keep that as PB
I don't understand..why is he multiplying?
Wait are you doing it or are you stuck, cause I don’t mean lol if you’re stuck
IDK
I’m
Stuck
What you have written is correct, you just need to substitute
^
.close
Closed by @inner torrent
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Oh

Ahwe
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
The degree is all the x together roght
So it would be 4?
@fresh bay Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How’s this wrong?
Sorry I don’t want any answers from someone who cares about pronouns
It should be infinity but yeah I guess I just plug in values that get closer and closer to 3 and see that the number is getting bigger. Problem is that I can’t use a calculator so I need to train my instinct to see when the number will end up tending to +/- inf
you just recognize denominator goes to 0
thats a probler
small denominator is big number
👍
/close
.close
Closed by @brave oxide
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
The rest of the options are "made an error on line 2..3..4" etc
@pseudo ledge Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @pseudo ledge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Error at 3) I believe
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, I am confusion. Can someone help explain? 🥲
Thanks!
Make a tree diagram
Eyy wait :0 after that I understood that I'd just be needing to add 1/2 and 2/5? Or am I high?
I’d still recommend drawing a tree diagram 😭
Okay done😭
Actually think about it
To get AT LEAST one batter out,
You can’t get both batters out, right?
Yep
And assuming you know all probability adds up to 1
I don't get it sorry
yo I'm really sorry but I don't get it. Where did the 10 come from? And idk why I understodo that 2/5 was the answer. I'm so confused.
do you know how probability tree diagrams work?
or how probability of events occurring works?
You times them
So
3/5 x 1/2 = 3/10
The answer is 7/10 but if you want me to explain you can DM me 😭
Where did 3/5 came aAaA. I feel so stupid. 😭
If the probability he strikes the first batter is 2/5
Then the probability he DOESN’T STRIKE (D.S) the first batter is 3/5
Cuz all probability add up to 1 and
1 - 2/5 = 3/5
Ahh I get where that's found. 😭
I'll also try researching more to understand it, but really thank you. 😭
.close
Closed by @ocean jay
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi
rather numerical methods
it basically means
the solution comes using a made-up function
there is no way to write it cleanly without using a made-up function
so you approximate it
this is what numerical methods mean
you can look at newtons method
or bisection
those are two common 'easy' ones
youll want to implement them on cos(x) - e^x = 0 as a root-finding problem
im jsut tryingh to find the area
there's no good way to express what c is without using the made-up function
youll need to approximate it
for which you could use desmos
or make your own algorithm
there is no 'exact' way without using W
you could just say
"c uses the lambert w function"
and just leave it as "c"
an option
.close
Closed by @versed marten
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello
So it needs to be expressed as a singe log
I do not understand why they do x^1/2 - 3 at the top
lol yes the first one in orange
Ok so do u know that the square root of x is = x^(1/2)
that would be 1
What would be 1
oh your telling me. Yes it is rasied to (1/2) because it is taking the square root
Yep
And since they are being subtracted they need to be changed to division
Yes
So in the start it is log3 (x^1/2 / x^3)
(Changed to division after the log terms are combined)
Yes
So here is where I am stuck
How to do x^(1/2) / x^3 ?
In to a single log yes
Well that’s just exponent laws
For example
x^6 / x^2 = x^(6-2) = x^4
Similarly
x^(1/2) / x^3 = x^[(1/2) -3] = x^ (-2.5)
Oh ok because exponent is the inverse of log
Yes that’s true, but I’m not sure how that applies to this
so when u have a exponet you takes the 2 power and subtract them
U get it now?
So in the example video the just subtracted 3 and got like denominators ?
Yes
Ok think I got it


