#help-10

1 messages · Page 120 of 1

wise talon
#

from now on

silver plover
#

why 69

wise talon
#

well

silver plover
#

derpz ur acc hella dirty minded

#

ive noticed

wise talon
#

you'll wait for a sequence

#

that converges to 69

#

but the terms of the sequence are

silver plover
wise talon
#

irrational numbers

#

your help will arrive in 1min

#

1/2 min

#

1/4 min

#

1/8 min

#

...

#

thats what will happen if u do not take analysis 2

silver plover
#

...

#

im doing all stats modules next year

#

plus differential equations and groups and rings

wise talon
#

measure theory? :O

#

take measure theory sotrue

#

which will require analysis 2

silver plover
#

#

not doing complex either

wise talon
#

why would u not do complex

#

complex is nice

#

at least take complex analysis

silver plover
#

is it like real?

wise talon
#

ehh its nicer

#

i heard

silver plover
#

if its like real i aint taking it

unreal musk
#

Depends on the place I think, for me analysis 2 was nicer than complex

#

Well at least in terms of learning it anyway lol

wise talon
#

what does analysis 2 cover at your school anyway @silver plover

silver plover
#

lets see

wise talon
#

oh why would you not take this

#

these arent too bad

silver plover
#

cuz groups and rings is easier

unreal musk
#

Beautiful catlove

wise talon
silver plover
#

its between this or group and rings

wise talon
#

later:

#

omg I hate abstract algebra

silver plover
#

cuz im doing maths and stats

#

so i have to do stats modules + differential equations

wise talon
#

we better not see you complaining about abstract algebra here opencry

#

if not

#

your helps will be answered with

wise talon
#

"trivial"

silver plover
#

...

wise talon
#

that is worth taking tho

unreal musk
#

"exercise for the reader" devilishsotrue

wise talon
#

anal2

silver plover
#

u wanna see

#

group and rings?

wise talon
#

like differentiation and integration is worth learning

#

dont you have a soul

#

dont you wanna go find some calc kids

#

and then go

#

proof:

#

for 2h

silver plover
#

heres groups and rings

wise talon
#

yep

unreal musk
#

Wonder if they cover PIDs, UFDs and the like

silver plover
#

easier than real 2?

unreal musk
#

Euclidean domains catlove

wise talon
#

err

#

honestly real analysis 1 is just hard because thats ur first exposure to analysis

#

once u get thru it

#

analysis 2 becomes MUCH easier to deal with because of your increased mathematical maturity

#

so seriously

#

dont be scared

#

it's genuinely genuinely worth taking it

#

the big struggle of analysis 1 is that it's your first proof based course

wise talon
#

so you have to learn to write proofs AND analysis at the same time

#

by now your mathematical maturity is quite sufficient and analysis 2 won't be so bad

#

it really builds on analysis 1

#

for example

#

we can use the algebraic limit theorem for sequences

#

to prove the algebraic limit theorem for functional limits

#

by characterizing how functional limits work as sequences

#

so don't waste your struggles in anal1

#

go forth and take it

#

seriously

#

you worked very hard to prove a bunch of things in analysis 1

#

and in 2 you get to taste the juicy fruits bore from the effort

#

you won't regret it

#

take analysis 2

#

ok if you take analysis 2

#

you will get help in

#

well as fast as possible

unreal musk
wise talon
#

if you dont take analysis 2 we have

unreal musk
#

You won't be alone cause we love lurking catThimc

wise talon
#

seriously tho

unreal musk
wise talon
#

i live for your analysis questions being opened in these channels

#

otherwise ill have to go look at a stats problem

#

now back to the list of angery emotes

#

if you dont take analysis 2

#

and of course

unreal musk
#

All posts you make will be instantly sullied KEK

wise talon
#

^

#

the entire helper team will sully every post you make if you do not take analysis 2

#

fr tho

#

we'll help you

#

plus we do analysis bookclub in the secret vc which u can use now

#

plzzzzz

#

stats problems always get ignored

#

but ur analysis problems will always get jumped on to help

#

PIDs might be in algebra 2 for sa2017

#

what they described seems to be algebra 1

wise talon
#

do it

#

also

#

if u do analysis 2 u can do measure theory which can

#

really enlighten stats

#

fr

silver plover
#

dang

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @silver plover

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

plain jungle
obtuse pebbleBOT
plain jungle
#

What value should we take as 'x'?

tardy epoch
plain jungle
#

I did not learn sets

tardy epoch
plain jungle
#

I don't have time for this

#

Can I get to know what value we should take for'x'

#

That's it

tardy epoch
tardy epoch
tardy epoch
obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@plain jungle Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

near pivot
#

Hey guys could someone help me with this pls?

near pivot
#

So I've tried doing it normally... however, I have to do 1/2 CHOOSE 2

#

which my calculator gives as error

#

I've also tried using the formula

#

n!/r!(n-r)!

#

Still didn't work...

#

Any help would be great!

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@near pivot Has your question been resolved?

glossy basalt
#

Why would I immediately think of taylor expansion about 0 instead of binomial expansion

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@near pivot Has your question been resolved?

timid silo
#

$\begin{pmatrix}1/2\2\end{pmatrix} = \frac{\frac{1}{2} \cdot(\frac12-1)}{2!} = -\frac{1}{8}$

warm shaleBOT
#

Landau08

timid silo
#

in analogy to, for instance, $\begin{pmatrix}4\2\end{pmatrix} = \frac{4\cdot 3}{2!}$

warm shaleBOT
#

Landau08

timid silo
#

In elementary algebra, the binomial theorem (or binomial expansion) describes the algebraic expansion of powers of a binomial. According to the theorem, it is possible to expand the polynomial (x + y)n into a sum involving terms of the form axbyc, where the exponents b and c are nonnegative integers with b + c = n, and the coefficient a of each ...

#

Newton was, I believe, the first to generalize the binomial theorem to fractional powers thereby anticipating Taylor's expansion in that special case

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@near pivot Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

spark blaze
#

There is a sign in the elevator that reads "6 people or 500 kg". What is the probability that the weight of 6 people will exceed 500 kg if the weight of a single person has a normal distributon N(75 kg; 10 kg)?

rigid lintel
#

10kg standard deviation or 10kg variance?

spark blaze
#

variance

sweet edge
#

U need to *6 and then get the z score for 500 and do 1 - P(Z < z) since u want P(X>500)

rigid lintel
#

the sum of all 6 is normally distributed

sweet edge
#

the distribution given is for 1 person

#

Ur curious about 6

#

So u gotta scale it appropriately

spark blaze
#

How do I scale it

rigid lintel
#

just the normal rules for expectations and variances

#

theyre iid after all

#

independant identically distributed

spark blaze
#

Sorry heavytf2 I don't know the "normal rules"

rigid lintel
#

alright well

#

suppose all X_i independant

spark blaze
#

ok this is the case becouse every person in the lift is different

#

right?

rigid lintel
#

then $var(\sum_{i = 1}^{n} X_i) = \sum_{i = 1}^{n} var(X_i)$

warm shaleBOT
rigid lintel
#

var meaning variance

spark blaze
#

ok but we need to scale distribution

#

We don't need var

rigid lintel
#

and the expectation stays the same

#

well

#

it gets multiplied by 6

#

so you have total weight is a random variable thats N(75*6, 60) distributed

spark blaze
#

Why we got the var if we just created distribution with *6 arguments

#

I don't get what's going on

sweet edge
#

The distribution is for a single person

#

But since u want to care about 6, u need to multiply the mean and var by 6

#

this will make the distribution suited for 6 people now

spark blaze
#

So why did we mess with var?

rigid lintel
#

because you need to know the variance of the total weight of 6 people

spark blaze
#

Don't I need to just get the area under the curve for this new distribution that we created?

#

Area to certain point ofc

rigid lintel
#

yeah thats it

spark blaze
#

So I normalize the distribution and get the anwser

#

Without use of var

rigid lintel
#

you cant normalize a distribution without thinking of var

spark blaze
#

ok what if I got other distribution? This "multiply arguments" methods works for them as well?

rigid lintel
#

not for all

#

suppose the exponential distribution

spark blaze
rigid lintel
#

the sum of exponentially distributed random variables is not exponentially distributed

spark blaze
#

The First one

rigid lintel
#

but it is gamma distributed

#

for normally distributed random variables however

#

it does work

#

provided the random variables are iid

rigid lintel
spark blaze
#

One more thing

Earlier, when I summed distributions, I needed to use an integral

"The random variable X has an exponential distribution with parameter λ = 2, a
the random variable Y has an exponential distribution with parameter μ = 10. It is also known that X and Y are independent. Determine the distribution density of the random variable Z = X + Y ."

#

Integral method always works and the scale args is just for normal distribution

#

Or how is that

rigid lintel
#

yes exactly how you said it

#

normal and iid

spark blaze
#

iid?

rigid lintel
#

independant identically distributed

spark blaze
#

ok, so when not sure - use integral method

rigid lintel
#

exactly

spark blaze
#

Thank you heavytf2

#

❤️

rigid lintel
#

np

spark blaze
#

ok, I'm closeing this ticket

#

have a good night ❤️

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @spark blaze

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

#
Channel closed

Closed by @heady holly

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

earnest oriole
obtuse pebbleBOT
old halo
#

ACD=CAD=31.5
from triangle ABC angle ABC=ACB
the sum of angles in a triangle is 180 degrees, so ABC+BAC+ACB=180
ACB+(31.5*2)+ACB=180
ACB=58.5
BCD=ACB-ACD=58.5-31.5=27

earnest oriole
#

woah?

old halo
#

Something wrong?

earnest oriole
#

thats right

#

but woah

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @earnest oriole

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

river ember
#

I've tried to use the slope formula to solve this, like y2 - y1 over the time x2-x1. Then I set up a proportion for 1 hour, but when I substituted the numbers from the chart, it didn't really work out. I think the reason for this is because it's exponential functions, but I'm not too sure. If anyone could help, I'd be grateful!!

dark stirrup
#

You are right. It's because it's an exponential decay

river ember
#

What do you think I should do first? I think I really do need some advice

gusty halo
dark stirrup
gusty halo
#

barely

dark stirrup
#

That's exponential decay

#

enough

#

First few drop-offs are 17

#

last are 11

#

That's a 35% difference

#

Quite significant

#

Also, the drop-off rate is always decreasing

#

If it were increasing and decreasing randomly, then I would argue linear

gusty halo
#

yeah i guess ur right

dark stirrup
dark stirrup
#

I wish it would "hourly rate of decay"

gusty halo
#

@river ember what math class is this?

river ember
dark stirrup
#

ah

gusty halo
#

probably linear then

dark stirrup
#

Maybe it is linear then..

#

yea

gusty halo
#

otherwise you need calculus

dark stirrup
#

But you know about exponential functions

#

It's a weird problem

#

What's the context of your other problems. Have they all been linear or exponential?

gusty halo
river ember
dark stirrup
#

I'll leave this to you ☹️☹️

#

I gotta take a shower

gusty halo
#

im just gonna assume its linear

#

@river ember what were you using for y1 and y2

#

and x1 and x2

#

i would recommend using 0 hours and 4 hours to get the most accurate measurement

#

or if you know how to do linear regression that works as well

#

hopefully that’s enough to help bc i gotta walk my dog now hes barking at me

#

gl

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@river ember Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

fathom flicker
#

I need help with this integral

obtuse pebbleBOT
fathom flicker
#

,, \int{e^{-t}sin(3t)dt}

warm shaleBOT
#

AustinU

fathom flicker
#

I am sending my work now

#

I need help finding my mistake

ivory trout
#

I have no paper w me but this integral screams IBP

fathom flicker
#

I want to solve using euler's method, not by parts.

#

I can do it by parts

#

and at the final step, here is the graph

#

Showing the two do not differ only by a constant

#

but such a small difference makes me feel like I was close and only had a small mistake

#

so if anyone could point it out to me I would appreciate it

#

if my solution (the one on the right) had arctan of positive 3 instead of negative three then the only difference between the graphs is that one is a sine function and the other cosine

#

this could come from where I represented 3i-1 as e^(itheta)

#

possibly there is a mistake there?

#

@tardy epoch

#

<@&286206848099549185>

stone bane
#

Honestly this looks like it screams laplace transform

fathom flicker
#

well

#

I can do the integral

#

using by parts

#

I am just trying to use this method to solve it, and I know there is a way

#

but also I don't know how to do laplace transforms yet

#

either

stone bane
#

Do you know some complex analysis or the leibniz rule?

#

Every easy way to solve this seems out of reach lol

#

Ohhhh

#

I see now

fathom flicker
#

Integration by parts is an easy way to solve

#

just do by parts until you get the original

#

and then it will be /2

#

I know the solution

stone bane
#

I’m not versed enough in the method you’re using to help too much, sorry

fathom flicker
#

dang

#

thats okay

#

putting these back at the top

#

<@&286206848099549185>

#

TLDR: I am getting a slight phase shift in my solution, I need help in identifying my error. I know this can be solved using integration by parts, I am trying to use this method for practice. Any help is appreciated. Thanks

#

for the integral

#

,, \int{e^{-t}sin(3t)dt}

warm shaleBOT
#

AustinU

wary vigil
#

i'm not entirely sure why you didn't continue from here

#

you almost have it

#

@fathom flicker

fathom flicker
#

I did

#

did I go in the wrong direction?

#

I started getting a substitute for the fraction in terms of

#

e^(itheta)

#

what should I have done instead?

wary vigil
#

you should've multiplied with the complex conjugate

#

top and bottom

#

and seperated the exponential into the real number and the complex number

fathom flicker
#

Okay, you're right that would work. I do believe that this method also works, do you see my error in doing it this way though?

wary vigil
#

you can then apply euler's formula again

fathom flicker
#

because a+bi can be rewritten as re^(itheta)

#

so if I did it correctly it still should've worked out

upbeat plinth
#

@fathom flicker this is one reason why we discourage asking for help outside your channel

fathom flicker
#

why?

upbeat plinth
#

you have someone helping you here while someone is already helping you in another channel

fathom flicker
#

this person came from the other channel

#

where I asked for help

#

and 2 brains are better than 1

upbeat plinth
#

we'd rather not have someone waste time on a problem thats already being helped with

wary vigil
#

have you tried using the angle addition formula

fathom flicker
#

I have not, but currently the two are not equal so applying an identity wont make them equal

upbeat plinth
#

so pls continue in only 1 channel

fathom flicker
#

okay, how do I tell howl to help me in this channel without "advertising it in another channe;"

wary vigil
#

isn't austin just here now?

fathom flicker
#

I am being helped in calculus aswell now

#

I asked in there again before you started helping me in here

wary vigil
#

ah ok

fathom flicker
#

except howl actually hasn't said anything yet

#

just that he would work on it

wary vigil
#

tell them to come to here

#

then we're all good

#

use the angle addition formula for sin

#

then use the relationship between the inverse trig functions and the trig functions

#

see what happens

fathom flicker
#

at what step of my problem

#

should I use the angle addition formula

#

the very end?

wary vigil
#

in the sin you have at the end of the first page

fathom flicker
#

okay

wary vigil
#

i'm looking at the identities and it's looking good

#

like you're getting the same result as the answer good

fathom flicker
#

should I also do that with the other side then

#

with the cosine

upbeat plinth
wary vigil
#

only with this

fathom flicker
#

okay so ignoring the denominator

#

I get

#

,, sin(-arctan(-3))cos(3t)+cos(-arctan(-3))sin(3t)

warm shaleBOT
#

AustinU

wary vigil
fathom flicker
#

^ thank you

wary vigil
fathom flicker
#

I was about to ask about that

#

lol

#

when was I supposed to learn those identities?

#

just curious

wary vigil
#

you weren't

fathom flicker
#

ah

wary vigil
#

but you weren't supposed to do it this way either 😄

fathom flicker
#

wait

#

I have negative arctangent

#

do I just use that cos(-x)=cos(x) and sin(-x)=-sin(x)

wary vigil
#

arctan is

fathom flicker
#

is that true

wary vigil
#

you could

#

you could also do

fathom flicker
#

gotcha

#

where are you pulling these identities from

#

you are quick with them

wary vigil
#

wikipedia

#

i have both pages open 😛

fathom flicker
#

lol

#

how did you become familiar with them?

wary vigil
#

doing these kinds of problems

#

means you quickly become familiar with the wiki pages for trigonometric identities

fathom flicker
#

ah so you just went and browsed for the right ones? or did you know these would be there already

wary vigil
#

i knew there is a formula for angle addition

fathom flicker
#

well yah

wary vigil
#

don't remember what it is precisely

fathom flicker
#

okay so I am getting

wary vigil
#

i know that arctan is antisymmetric

fathom flicker
#

,, \frac{3}{sqrt(10)}cos(3t)+\frac{1}{sqrt(10)}sin(3t)

warm shaleBOT
#

AustinU

wary vigil
#

and i knew there had to be some formulae for inverse trig in trig

#

yup

fathom flicker
#

and I should now do the same thing to the other side?

wary vigil
#

other side?

#

you almost have it

fathom flicker
#

because I don't yet see how that is equivalent to -cos(3t-arctan(1/3))

#

where are you trying to take me to?

#

I have been trying to show the equivalency

wary vigil
fathom flicker
#

what should I be doing

wary vigil
#

i thought you wanted to show that what you got through the re^iphi

#

was correct

fathom flicker
#

yes that is what I want to do

wary vigil
#

yeah so you had the imaginary part

#

which should be equivalent to this

wary vigil
fathom flicker
#

yes

wary vigil
#

and we're almost there

#

😄

fathom flicker
#

one second let me gather my thoughts

wary vigil
#

ok

fathom flicker
#

okay yes so the thing at the bottom of the page

#

got it

#

I was looking at the bottom of the other page

wary vigil
fathom flicker
#

and they are similar

wary vigil
#

=

fathom flicker
#

so it worked out

wary vigil
fathom flicker
#

yah

wary vigil
#

by using those trig identities

#

you found that yes you got the right answer

#

that indeed the method you used was correct

fathom flicker
#

hold on okay

#

then how come when I graph it

wary vigil
#

if a bit heavy on the trig identity sides

#

side

fathom flicker
#

they aren't the same?

wary vigil
#

computer doesn't always understand these functions perfectly

fathom flicker
#

I am actually missing a negative sign

#

I probably just lost it

#

but

#

yes I did

#

found it

#

okay I see the equivalence now

#

so I was correct the whole time?

wary vigil
#

you were

timid silo
#

🤣

fathom flicker
#

well I'm really glad I spent an hour and 30 minutes to confirm that

wary vigil
#

lol

fathom flicker
#

seriously thank you for the help though

wary vigil
#

next time try the way i proposed at the start 😄

#

or IBP

fathom flicker
#

the conjugate?

#

what is IBP

wary vigil
#

ye

fathom flicker
#

oh

#

by part

#

yeah

wary vigil
#

yes

fathom flicker
#

I can do that in like 2 sec

#

lol

#

howl did you solve it

timid silo
#

Nope don't know anything about integrating using Euler's identity :catthink: something new to learn

fathom flicker
#

it's something I learned in diffeq actually

#

or in a online diffeq lecture

#

I haven't really taken diffeq yet

#

well thank you guys for your time

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @fathom flicker

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

fathom flicker
#

that looks tedious

karmic hedge
#

I got:
g(x) = x^3 - x +9
g'(x) = 3x^2 - 1
h(x) = x*sqrt(x) + ln(x)
h'(x) = sqrt(x) + x/2sqrt(x)

karmic hedge
fathom flicker
#

stop

#

I see an issue

unreal musk
#

h'(x) is wrong

fathom flicker
#

h'(x)

#

you forgot the ln(x)

#

to derive that

karmic hedge
#

omg

#

yes you are right

unreal musk
#
  • convert $x\sqrt{x} = x^{\frac{3}{2}}$
warm shaleBOT
#

chartbit

karmic hedge
karmic hedge
#

and just use product rule

unreal musk
#

You could use product rule of course, it will get you the same thing!

karmic hedge
#

Ah ok nice

#

Cool, thanks guys!!

#

❤️

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @karmic hedge

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

idle spade
#

can't figure out the blanks

obtuse pebbleBOT
idle spade
#

i understand that the derivative of u is 6x-pi

#

but i'm not sure how to incorporate that into the substitution to get f(u)

lone jetty
#

So understand that the derivative of u is with respect to x

#

So you have du/dx = 6x - pi

#

So you can isolate dx to get $dx = \frac{1}{6x - \pi} \cdot du$

warm shaleBOT
idle spade
#

correct yes

lone jetty
#

You can replace $3x^2 - \pi x + \pi$ with the definition of u

warm shaleBOT
lone jetty
#

and the fraction will cancel out xs from the top

#

so you are left with the integral only in terms of u

idle spade
#

okay you lost me there

lone jetty
#

So we have $\frac{12x - 2 \pi}{3x^2 - \pi x + \pi} \cdot dx$

warm shaleBOT
lone jetty
#

We can first replace the denominator with u

#

$\frac{12x - 2 \pi}{u} \cdot dx$

warm shaleBOT
lone jetty
#

Right?

idle spade
#

yes

lone jetty
#

And we know $dx = \frac{1}{6x - \pi} \cdot du$

warm shaleBOT
lone jetty
idle spade
#

right

warm shaleBOT
idle spade
#

ahhhhh thats where the cross kicks in

lone jetty
#

Yeah, cancels out KEK

#

remember to rewrite your bounds in terms of u as well

#

you're integrating between 0 and 1 in terms of x. you're integrating between something else in terms of u.

idle spade
#

yes between

#

pi and 3

lone jetty
#

yep looks correct 😄

idle spade
#

ahhh okay

#

the cross is where it gets me

#

like getting to the cancellation

#

the step just before that

lone jetty
#

you were almost there

#

just write it all out in long form and it should click

idle spade
#

but i see that now its just combining the two

#

yes i recall that now

#

fully lost it until you helped me out there though

#

thank you very much

lone jetty
#

np 😄

idle spade
#

ah wait

#

sorry so from here, do i just plug in my f(u), a and b into the integral and solve that?

#

then go back in terms of x based on the output

#

wait no

#

i just solve in terms of u and it should answer it

#

okok got it all good

#

thank you!!

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@idle spade Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @idle spade

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

timber osprey
#

in this system of equation, the rank of the augmented matrix is 2 right? therefore it has infinitely many solutions?

timber osprey
#

0x+0y=0 (last row of the row enchlon matrix)
infinitely many solutions right?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@timber osprey Has your question been resolved?

gilded needle
#

according to matlab, the last row is 0 0 0 1, which would be inconsistent

timber osprey
#

@gilded needle

gilded needle
#

wait hold on

#

shouldn't your augmented matrix be 3x4?

#

like this: ```
1 1 -3 2
2 1 1 1
3 2 -2 0

timber osprey
#

There's only 2 variables though no?

#

X and Y

gilded needle
timber osprey
#

And 3 equations so 3 rows

gilded needle
#

what are "-3z" and "z" and "-2z"

timber osprey
#

Oh my

#

I'm sorry I sent the wrong question lol

gilded needle
#

oh haha

timber osprey
#

They're very similar

gilded needle
#

ok, pls send the one you intended

timber osprey
gilded needle
#

ok

timber osprey
#

Also I only calculated REF not Reduced REF
I don't think it's needed for calculating the rank right

gilded needle
#

matlab agrees that the last row is 0 0 0

#

yeah you don't need to go all the way to rref

#
    1.0000         0    0.6000
         0    1.0000    0.2000
         0         0         0
timber osprey
#

so any x and y value will work

#

because 0x+0y=0 right

gilded needle
#

no, there are three equations and 2 unknowns

#

getting 0 0 0 for the last row just says that the equations are not inconsistent

#

so you can ignore the last row and focus on the first two: ```
1.0000 0 0.6000
0 1.0000 0.2000

#

this is the RREF so you can read off the solution directly

#

x = 0.6 and y = 0.2

#

unique solution

timber osprey
#

confused here
did you simply ignore the last equation? thats allowed?

gilded needle
#

if it's 0 0 0 then that is equivalent to 0x + 0y = 0

timber osprey
#

yes

gilded needle
#

a true equation but a useless one as it doesn't tell you anything

#

so in that case you can ignore it

#

if it had been instead:

#

0 0 1

#

that would mean 0x + 0y = 1

#

i.e. 0 = 1

#

which is impossible, hence that would mean there is no solution

timber osprey
#

so when a zero row exists in a augmented matrix of a system of equations, i cant say anything about how many solutions it has?

gilded needle
#

right, a zero row , say 0 0 0 in this case, just means
0x + 0y = 0
which is true for all x,y

#

it's equivalent to 0 = 0

#

so it doesn't tell you anything at all about x and y

timber osprey
#

yes
also Rank = number of unknowns so there exists exactly one unique solution

#

i think i got it thanks

gilded needle
#

rank is at most the number of unknowns

#

it can be less

timber osprey
#

when it is less, no solutions right?

gilded needle
#

no, it depends

#

if the equations are consistent, then rank < number of unknowns means there are infinitely many solutions

#

if the equations are inconsistent then there is no solution, regardless of the rank

timber osprey
#

ah i see

#

thanks

gilded needle
#

sure

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@timber osprey Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @timber osprey

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

violet ingot
#

I do not understand how the answer could be 1.5 and not -2.5

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@violet ingot Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@violet ingot Has your question been resolved?

sweet edge
#

hmm

#

oh oops

#

,w 4^2-7*4+14

sweet edge
#

,w 4.5^2-7*4.5+14

sweet edge
#

,w (2.75-2 )/ .5

sweet edge
#

yep./

#

@violet ingot so you messed up the S(4) part

#

that's all

violet ingot
#

Yes

sweet edge
#

yep!

violet ingot
#

Thx

sweet edge
#

np

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@violet ingot Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @violet ingot

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

glossy basalt
#

!status

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin
2. I have begun but got stuck midway
3. I got an answer but I'm told it's wrong
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked
5. I have a question about someone else's worked solution
6. None of the above
#

@drowsy pawn Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed due to the original message being deleted

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

twilit pelican
obtuse pebbleBOT
twilit pelican
#

would appreciate any help with this

#

my current work

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@twilit pelican Has your question been resolved?

twilit pelican
#

<@&286206848099549185>

twilit pelican
#

<@&286206848099549185>

glad valley
#

<@&286206848099549185> come on helpers blanket has helped answer alot of people's questions, it's time we give back

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@twilit pelican Has your question been resolved?

twilit pelican
#

<@&286206848099549185>

fathom flicker
#

blanket

#

I'd love to help you, but it is very late at night for me, if you DM me this I will get you help / a solution in the morning

#

or keep waiting for others

twilit pelican
#

ill dm before i sleep if i dont get anything from others or myself by then

#

ty!

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@twilit pelican Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @twilit pelican

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

jade perch
#

Im paying a loan $260000 at 2.36% interest which would make the A=468765.3033 monthly repayments should be 1562.551 (im not sure) i then want to pay an extra $250 a month from the get go i need to work out how much interest that cuts off and how much time

jade perch
#

I need a formula aswell

mellow glacier
#

!15m

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.

#

@jade perch Has your question been resolved?

jade perch
#

<@&286206848099549185>

#

<@&286206848099549185>

#

<@&286206848099549185>

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@jade perch Has your question been resolved?

jade perch
#

<@&286206848099549185>

lost island
#

<@&286206848099549185>

jade perch
#

I love getting ignored ngl

jade perch
#

<@&286206848099549185>

sweet jacinth
#

?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@jade perch Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

timid silo
#

If a and b are well formed formulas, prove

  1. a and b are tautologically equivalent
  2. (a <-> b) is a tautology
obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@timid silo Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@timid silo Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@timid silo Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @vocal knoll

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

regal shuttle
obtuse pebbleBOT
obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@regal shuttle Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @regal shuttle

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

prisma flax
#

i have 32 students in my class, what is the possibility that 10% of them has the same birthday?

drifting wraith
#

0?

#

it's just impossible, the number is not divisible by 10, 3.2 students would never have the same birthday

prisma flax
#

just so what is the possibilty that 3 students has the same birthday?

#

<@&286206848099549185>

#

please hewlp me

loud tangle
#

do you have their specific ages because then we could count leap years as well

prisma flax
#

i mean

#

the same year

#

not year

#

like data

#

for example

#

1.1

#

@loud tangle

loud tangle
#

if it was in say 2020 the chance would be slightly lower due to the fact that there is an extra day

prisma flax
#

i mean

#

it is called

#

birthday paradox

#

i just need to calc it with 32

loud tangle
#

are we allowed to assume they are all the same age?

prisma flax
#

yes

loud tangle
#

in the sense that theyre born in the same year

prisma flax
#

same age and month, day is known

loud tangle
#

well you have to do case work for when the month is 30 or 31 days long

#

or 28/29 for february

prisma flax
#

we can just say

#

365 dys

loud tangle
#

you said same age and month so that means they all share a month of bdays

prisma flax
#

the chance of a student having the same date as the other is 1/ 365

loud tangle
#

unless im misinterpreting

prisma flax
#

not same month

#

just same year

loud tangle
prisma flax
#

there is 365 days so the possibility for 1 having the same birthday as other one is 1 in 365

#

so i need to calculate it for 32 students

loud tangle
#

that 10% of them share their birthday?

#

or that all do

prisma flax
#

so what is the possibility that 3 of them has the same birthday

#

yes

loud tangle
#

1/365³

#

because for 1 student to have a speciric bday it would be a 1 in 365 chance

prisma flax
#

yes

loud tangle
#

if it were 2 it would be 1/365*1/365=1/365²

#

and same goes for 3

prisma flax
#

but theres a problem

#

u only checked for 1 student

#

u need to check for the entire class

#

each student with another student

loud tangle
#

it applies to any 3 students though

prisma flax
#

yes

loud tangle
#

because youre not specifying what birthday

#

ur just saying they have it in common

prisma flax
#

do u want me to explain again?

loud tangle
#

what is it that you dont understand

#

/genq

prisma flax
#

I hve 32 students in my class, what is the chance that 3 of the students in my class share the same birthday

#

ignore the year

#

lets assume they are all born in the same year

#

In probability theory, the birthday problem asks for the probability that, in a set of n randomly chosen people, at least two will share a birthday. The birthday paradox refers to the counterintuitive fact that only 23 people are needed for that probability to exceed 50%.
The birthday paradox is a veridical paradox: it seems wrong at first glanc...

proper forum
#

A silly question but why doesn't the probability depend upon the total number of students in the class? I've probably confused "possibility" and "probability".

proper forum
loud tangle
#

i think i might have had the wrong approach

#

ah i see

#

i didnt consider the number of possible cases propperly

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@prisma flax Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

bold grotto
#

Is the answer -root3/3<f(x)<root 3/3

obtuse pebbleBOT
bold grotto
#

I differentiated it at 0

#

And got in cos form
Solved for x value

#

I got pi/3

#

And input that into the formula to got output

#

And answer of Is the answer -root3/3<f(x)<root 3/3

unreal musk
#

For one, you can tell the range will have something like “0<=f(x) <= …” just by looking at the picture oh they only did it for a part, nvm me

#

,w sin(x)/(2-cos(x))

unreal musk
bold grotto
#

Oh

#

Damm

#

Sorry gove me a sec to look at that

#

Is -1/root 3 tge same as -root3/3

unreal musk
bold grotto
#

Oh okay still it's intresting to see it visually

#

Very cool!!!

#

Thank you!!!

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @bold grotto

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

exotic creek
obtuse pebbleBOT
exotic creek
#

why is it minus 1/2(x "minus" 9) -3

#

why is it not plus?

#

$x+9$

warm shaleBOT
#

yomiko

trim portal
#

And you know it is lowest at x=9

#

So the inside expression must be 0

#

and x-9=0 at point x=9

exotic creek
#

hmm

exotic creek
warm shaleBOT
#

yomiko

exotic creek
#

because there is one positive grad and one negative grad so its just 2 straight line equation

trim portal
#

That should work I think

#

lemme check

exotic creek
#

it does work i calculated it wrong

#

my bad

trim portal
#

Oh wait doesnt

#

it should be -9/2

exotic creek
#

i got the answer tho

#

1 min

#

nvm it doesnt work

trim portal
exotic creek
#

but why doesn't $(x/2 + 9/2)-3$

warm shaleBOT
#

yomiko

exotic creek
#

why doesn't it work

trim portal
#

Because there needs to be -9/2

#

The blue line is the one you proposed, and the red is the actual absolute value

#

Absolute value has minimum when the expression inside=0

#

in this case the expression inside is x+b, and you know that it equals 0 when x=9. (By point A) So 9+b=0, solve for b and b=-9

exotic creek
#

right ok

#

thanks

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @exotic creek

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

small bolt
obtuse pebbleBOT
#

Please don't occupy multiple help channels.

short spruce
#

what have you tried

royal basin
#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @royal basin

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

timid silo
obtuse pebbleBOT
timid silo
#

I can do a taylor series of one function

#

And I know what it is for cos

#

But I don't know how to do this

plain stag
#

For multivariable functions, it's the same, you're just differentiating wrt each variable

#

First order taylor uses both first order partial derivatives, second order uses all second order partial derivatives, etc

timid silo
plain stag
#

Pretty much

timid silo
#

That's um

#

Easy

#

Lol thank you 🙂

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @mighty junco

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

clear owl
#

please explain the whole problem (11 and 10)

obtuse pebbleBOT
timid silo
#

for (11) there are 3 right angled triangles. Apply Pythagoras theorem formula on the smaller triangle to the left to get the unknown side in terms of 'x'.
Once you get that, apply Pythagoras theorem formula on the triangle to the right to get the other unknown side.
Then apply Pythagoras formula on the big outer triangle. You would get a quadratic in x and can solve for x

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@clear owl Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

carmine token
obtuse pebbleBOT
carmine token
#

i’m getting 7/6

#

but answer is supposed to be 5/6

#

do you guys know why?

#

i did right- left

#

it’s problem 3in the worksheet

warm canopy
#

it should be the region to the left of the one you shaded

#

oh wait

#

nvm

carmine token
#

yeah

#

the triangle thing right ?

warm canopy
#

the one you shaded is right

#

you need to find that point of intersection

#

and do 2 separate integrals

carmine token
#

(0,0) and (1,1)

carmine token
timid silo
warm canopy
#

because for the first half of the region you want the area under x^2, and for the second half of the region you want the area under x+y=2

timid silo
#

,w x^2 +x -2 = 0

timid silo
#

i see

carmine token
#

wait should it be from -2 to 1 in my integral?

warm canopy
#

your integral should be from 0 to 2

#

split at 1

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@carmine token Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

languid sky
#

How would I calculate the complexity of the following algorithm? (in python)

    if x == 0:
        return y+1
    elif y == 0:
        return f(x-1, 1)
    else:
        return f(x-1, f(x, y-1))
languid sky
#

i forgot how to do it

languid sky
tardy epoch
#

computer science

languid sky
#

ah

tardy epoch
#

don't know which link actually

#

top or bottom

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@languid sky Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

native latch
#

I'm having trouble understanding this logic. This is my interpretation:
If p is true, q is true = p is false or q is true

native latch
#

p: I press the power button
q: The computer turns off
p->q if i press button, computer turns off
is the same as
i dont press button or computer turns off

#

it makes no sense

#

unless the V means "either or" and not just "or"

#

so it becomes either i dont press button or computer turns off

#

can someone confirm this?

timid silo
#

erm take it by each case

#

also i dont like your q because not q is the computer turning on which is something that the power button does

#

take if its raining outside then i have an umbrella

#

where p is if its raining

#

and q is if u have an umbrellla

#

not p is if its not raining

#

so the statement: its not raining outside or i have an umbrella can only be false if its raining and you dont have an umbrella

#

u feel me

native latch
obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@native latch Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @native latch

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

obtuse locust
obtuse pebbleBOT
obtuse locust
#

this question has a range of {1.3 ≤ x ≤ 1.75}

tranquil sonnet
#

What I would do is just set an inequality up

#

Hmm but might be really messy

#

Actually just solve for x when the volume is 300 more, and 900 more

#

You’ll get a quadratic

obtuse locust
#

i had to figure out the range values which is x cant be under 1.3 or over 1.75 if it is you get over 900 or under 300

#

but i wasnt sure if thats all it wanted

obtuse locust
obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@obtuse locust Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@obtuse locust Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@obtuse locust Has your question been resolved?

obtuse locust
lucid flume
#

See this

#

You need to compute for two different cubic equations

#

(x+3)(x+5)(x+11)=900
(x+3)(x+5)(x+11)=300

#

Solve them and find the value of 'x' from both of them

#

then set the lowest value of 'x as the lower boundary

#

and the highest as the higher boundary

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@obtuse locust Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @obtuse locust

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

tired sierra
obtuse pebbleBOT
tired sierra
#

what am I doing wrong here?

sweet edge
#

What have u got so far

tired sierra
#

i found |v| which is 5 through sqrt 3^2+4^2

#

then subbed it into |u||v|cos(0)

#

so its |u| x 5 x cos60=0

#

that gives me 5/2 move to other side 2/5

#

but the answers 4

sweet edge
#

wait a sec

#

it's not = 0

#

the dot product is 10

#

not 0

#

so u dot v = 10 = |v||u|cos(60)

#

|v|=5 so
2 = |u|cos(60)

tired sierra
#

oh my god I overlooked the scalar product being 10

#

thats my fault