#help-10
1 messages · Page 99 of 1
Yh
x< -5 is an inequality that also defines R
Literally draw the line x=-5
alr
y=3x+15
First inequality
2nd inequality
So the region that satisfies all inequalities is region R where all the colours are there
Cool nws
so coming back to the Question statement
how was i supposed to figure out that X<-5
was even there
OK give me a sec
alr
If you disregard x<-5
Then you see that region R is in quadrant 2,3 and 1
Where blue and red coincide
oh
But region R is only in quadrant 2 and 3
id completely ignored tht part of the Q satement ngl
shit i always make these kinda mistakes
well thanks a lot for ur help richie
i finally got this
Nws lol I've learnt smth as well m good for revision thx 😊
OK gn
Closed by @lone harbor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello,I'm stuck on permutations,this is the following problem:
Considering this permutation S7
Decompose it in separated permutations,transpositions and find the inverse.
Note that the inverse is just doing the transpositions again, but in reverse order
A general result from group theory:
(ab)' = b'a'
Where I'm using ' as inverse.
(24)(15)(13)(16)(17)
Is the inverse of 2).
I needed the inverse of this
wait
maybe i remember
is it just by going right to left
instead of left to right?
That's the same as 2, I thought?
Anyway,
σ' = (16547)'(531)'(17546)'(2415)'
Then ' reverses the order of each
σ' = (74561)(135)(64517)(5142)
that easy?
Ye
are the first 2 right?
and how could i check that?
@small sand Has your question been resolved?
@small sand Has your question been resolved?
you can close this im going to sleep,ill come back tomorrow thanks 😄
Closed by @trail cloak
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi
I need help with a geometry problem
Oh shoot sorry
I need to find all the lettered numbers
I completely forgot I cropped that but out 🤦🏼♀️
Hello! You want to start at the triangle with the two equations. If you look it has two equal sides making it isosceles.
@molten dune Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @molten dune
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
guys i’m stuck
I saw your other question, so thought it might help if I said this here, since it will help with this question too
A good technique for questions like this where one term has x in the power and another term has, say, x+3 in the power is to get rid of the +3 and then divide, like this.
You can do a very similar thing here.
It's a nice trick to remember. It makes these questions a bit nicer.
I personally would do that, yeah.
There are several ways of getting the answer though.
what do i from here
i got that 343•2^x=32•2401^x
That looks good so far, yeah
Divide all of the numbers with x's onto one side
And all of the other numbers onto the other side.
Then you can bring both of the x's together in the same way I did in my picture.
That should be it!
Perfect!
You can always put it back into the original equation just to check.
yea let me do that
But if you followed everything right, it should be fine.
i was stuck at the constant part with 32 and 243
i didn’t think of dividing by both of them
Yeah, it's something you need to get used to, but when you know the pattern, it becomes much easier.
A lot of the questions like this end up being very similar.
So you can reapply the same idea over and over and it should work out.
yea
Although there will always be some questions that can throw you off, but in general it should be fine!
so what other method can you use instead of expanding the terms
if you want to use the logarithm early on
You basically log both sides (It doesn't matter what base it is) Then you expand it out, bring all of the x's onto one side, then factorise and divide.
ok let me try
Go for it!
What you want to do is get only one x on the left side. So you want to try to make it say "x= ......"
To do that, go back to the second line and then expand everything.
Ok
Then bring every term with an x in it on the left, and every term without one onto the right.
Start from the second line, since that would make it easier.
ohh i thought what u meant was the second line of my work
It's close, but there are two mistakes, yeah.
yea i put the wrong sign in front of 3ln7
Yep.
And the ln2 next to the x in your second line of working disappears in the next line.
oops lol
But other than that, perfect!
Both answers will give the same result. And I checked, they are indeed correct.
Nice going!
ty bro
Closed by @spice chasm
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi
So whos here
,rotate
alright
For the first problem, you are going to want to find the Y-intercept, and the slope
yea, you can use any two points
My teacher said Preferbly the ones closest to 0
which one are you going to have be y1, and which one y2
,rotate
Ignore the bottom
alright, so that answer is your slope.
alright, so X is going to be our mugs because the number of mugs isn't going to change. X often is the independent variable.
so when X=0, what is the value of the other variable.
When there are 0 mugs, how much is the other thing there going to be.
Basically, what is the y value when x = 0
They were both easy
lmao
Well
.
They got the easier one to explain
Ik
no, so the collumns are related to eachother, when we look at where 0 is, what is in the bottom row
@rare wyvern continue
The cost
The other one, was just a plot form of the table, same concept
so the cost where the mugs is 0 is the y-intercept
the starting value
Just relate the price and the amount of mugs
Ok….
Ok I got it I think
Ill send a image of what im about to write soon
ok look at dis

Ignore everything besides question 17
,rotate
thats good, but check over the Y-intercept in A.
Also your equation is wrong
Not
It is
Whats wrong?
The y intercept
The y intercept is the where x = 0
As mentioned before, mugs is the x value, cost is the y value
But none of my X = 0 in there
What is the y value that corresponds with x = 0?
on the table with all of the other values
You are looking for the y value that corresponds with x = 0
What is that y value that is paired with x = 0?
5.99
so when your mugs(x) is zero, then the cost is going to be 5.99
As mentioned before b is the y intercept
Where x = 0
Meaning that b is the value of y when x = 0
So
So basically 5.99
Please read #❓how-to-get-help
Yes
Stop asking 50 questions and read what I presented
If you follow the statements I presented, you should identify the proper value
yes
As mentioned before b is the y intercept
Where x = 0
Meaning that b is the value of y when x = 0
Im answering his question
All you need to do is to identify the value of y when x = 0
Like 4 or 3 times I think
he just wants you to understand it for further questions
I dont understand
If you use that table properly, you don't need to question it every time
I mentioned before, during a test, you won't be able to question your teacher if it's the correct answer. You either know it or you don't based on the given info
So what is the y intercept, based on the given info, and don't question it
Ty
Got to finish this whole page and its tooken me 4 hours to be half done
@rare wyvern what about this one I feel like its simple but maybe its not
Use the words given, $8 per hour
Yeah
That means every hour, $8 is made
Hold on im onto something I think
Since there is no 8 in earnings on the graph
Gotta create my own 8 correct?
until the end of the graph
Then connect the points
Did you connect the dots?
Yes
If this is what you have, you did not connect the dots
You are connecting the dots at every point you created
Yeah im going up 8 every time

You created a dot at (1, 8) correct?
And then (2, 16)
And so on
Connect those dots with a line
You can if you want to
Apply the same idea you did with question 16
Y=8?
No
Recall that equation of a line is y = mx + b
Yes the same process you did for question 16, apply to that question
Ok ill try even though 8 only connected with 40 out of all of those
You see how you drew two lines at each point? Where it intersects?
Draw a line through each intersection
So can you find the slope of that line?
But it only intersects on 40?
What?
Then you didn't draw it correctly
Those are the points you plotted
Oh shit
Draw a line through them
I didnt see that
You see how you drew two lines at each point? Where it intersects?
Draw a line through each intersection
That is what that means
Yes
I don't see an equation
The slop is also mentioned in the text
8
No
At 0 of my graph?
Oh its just 8
Yes
Ok so were finding B right now
Look at the line you drew in on the paper
E
Ok
What is the value of y when x = 0?
So then the y intercept is?
So then the equation of the line is?
What does 8/1 equal to?
Yes so are X is 1 correct?
What?
.
x is a variable
y and x will always exist in the equation of a line
No
What is m?
You already said it multiple times
No
Yep
No
Are you getting trolled @nocturne minnow
Probably
.
.
Oh
.
Is there a value for y here?
Where is 1 coming from
Recall that the equation of a line is y = mx + b
You have the values for m and b, plug those values into that equation
Waitttt
As mentioned
y and x will always exist in the equation of a line
Well
the equation of a line is y = mx + b
Its going up by 8 every time
y and x will always exist in the equation of a line
Have you never seen an equation of a line?
Like y = 3x + 45
That's an equation of a line
Don't think bolding will work on trolls
Where y and x still exist
What is 0?
X
Have you never seen an equation of a line?
Like y = 3x + 45
That's an equation of a line
Where on earth do you see x is 0?
x is still there
Why are you saying numbers for x?
Have you never seen an equation of a line?
Like y = 3x + 45
That's an equation of a line
Oh
y and x will always exist in the equation of a line
Ohh
Stop guessing and read
Yes
Correct?

@nocturne minnow i have 3 more short answers if u could just answer them for me ill be on my way to doing my project

No
I'm done
You can either wait for someone else to help, or stop doing math and just ask your teacher for help
Well this is homework
I guess ill do it on my own its pretty essy
Thx for ur hard work

As I mentioned before, you are lacking tons of knowledge that you need, so if it's homework, then you can ask your teacher tomorrow for help
They can help you one on one
@nocturne minnow truth is I am a spirit and god made me come here to test you
You will never see me again
🙏
Closed by @small folio
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I dont really understand what the question is asking
you are asked to write down the equation that says "The distance from (x,y) to P equals the distance from (x,y) to Q"
and to then do some algebra to it to isolate y in it
@karmic hedge does that clarify the problem statement for you?
I think so, 1 moment I will try it
Im not going to close the chat yet incase I get stuck
(x-1),(y-3)=(x+2),(y-5)
I dont know what to do next...
🤔 what do those commas mean?
Try using the distance formula instead
Ok I will try
Closed by @karmic hedge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i forgot how to do this but for,
[
x_1 + x_2 + x_3 + x_4 + x_5 = 21
]
How do i find all possible solutions to the system if $0 \leq x_1 \leq 3, \enspace 1 \leq x_2 \leq 4, \enspace x_3 \geq 15$
♡LexQa♡
♡LexQa♡
okay should've just said whole numbers
Take $y_1=x_1, y_2=(x_2-1), y_3=(x_3-15),y_4=x_4$ and $y_5=x_5$
$y_1+y_2+y_3+y_4+y_5=(x_1+x_2+x_3+x_4+x_5)-(16)=21-16=5$
What 5?
For this system of equations, by stars and bars, 9C5 possible solutions are there.
Ignoring the upper bound*
i believe that's incorrect though
How?
the answer is C(10,4) - 20
I'm still not done with my work
oh i see

okay
There are upper bounds for x_1 and x_2
Writing them in terms of y's, $y_1 \leq 3$ and $y_2+1 \leq 4$
Finding number of possible solutions for the counterpart and subtracting it from the total should work

that is when, $y_1 \geq 4$ and $y_2 \geq 4$
@timid silo Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @native knoll
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
My guess with no work is to e both sides of the original: $e^{y} = 2 + \sin(2x)$
chartbit
hmm why?
is it because ln and e will evaluate to 1
actually that probbaly is why lol
Then $y' e^{y} = 2\cos(2x)$, and $(y')^2 e^{y} + y'' e^{y} = -4\sin(2x)$
chartbit
Actually that's much easier, there we go haha
chartbit
Then implicit differentiate that twice
,w differentiate e^y
,w differentiate e^(2y)
,w diff e^{y(x)} wrt x
You're done there
$\dv{y}{x} \dv{y}{x} = \left(\dv{y}{x} \right)^{2}$
chartbit
why?
err
if that's for that first part, then this…
…and this…
im actually blind
…are the same, no?
Don't worry, happens to many of us 
Think that's what they're saying too 
True but then you can find y easily, and dy/dx, and then d^2y/dx^2 and so on, yea?
uhh do u mean i can find those easily after subbing x = 0?
or is there a shorter way
ohh
yes
chartbit
And so on, and so forth 🖼️
wait am i doing the same thing
Good question 
hm
Lemme see if I agree with your second derivative
alrighty
Your first I do

Hmm I get $\frac{d^2 y}{dx^2} = -1$
chartbit
hm
As then from this, and with $y = \ln(2), \dv{y}{x} = 1$
chartbit
Get $2 \frac{d^2 y}{dx^2} + 2(1)^2 = 0$
chartbit
Hmm, can you circle the one you used for the second derivative please?
Oh hold up a minute

oh umm its the one where i wrote "wtf am i doing"
$\left( \dv{y}{x} \right)^2 \neq \frac{d^2 y}{dx^2}$
chartbit
AH
Naughty 

Let me check it though myself, it's getting a bit nuts to the third order 

uh
Aha, what I got too, me can do math
"me can do math" casually has graduate+ in ur roles
Well, not "entirely" wrong 
Yeah, don't know how that even happened, how did I even make it out of a masters huh
I'm more a concept guy tbh, calculations I always mess up
Well definitely not the PhD part 

i heard in the real world u dont have to do manual calculations
soooo
its the concept thats more important (i think)
I get the third derivative as -2?
From this, I get $2(y''' + (1)^3 + 3(1)(-1)) = 2(y''' - 2)$
chartbit
hm so my differentiation is wrong for the third one
Then RHS is -8, right?
Typo
OH

wait but theres still a 2 right
it still feels wrong
am i doing it correctly here lol
ah

,w differentiate (e^y) * (dy/dx)^2
wut

Expand it, you get $2 e^y \dv{y}{x} \frac{d^2 y}{dx^2} + e^y \left(\dv{y}{x}\right)^{3}$
chartbit
wait why do we differentiate the first one
What do you mean? remember that y and its derivatives depend on x
OH WAIT
ok nvm i see it now

AH OK ITS CORRECT
tysm
i kinda gtg lol
thanks alot 
@feral sentinel Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is 0 raised to the power 0 is 1 ??
Honestly it depends on how you want to define it. There are books where 0^0 is 0 and some books where it is 1
?
for simplicity sake, you can say it is 1 for most cases tbh
another reason it's generally undefined is that x^0 is 1 for x > 0, so taking limit as x->0+ you'd deduce that 0^0 = 1. But on the other hand, 0^y = 0 for y > 0, so taking limits as y->0+ you'd deduce that 0^0 = 0
its undefined but sometimes we take it to be 1 as a convention to make formulas or equations more compact
i mean 0^0 is sometimes defined as 1, but never 0
For example in Tao where he defines power of a natural number, he takes n^0 as 1 for all natural number in particular for 0 also
if you're doing further college or advanced maths in A level they would break it down into something more complex but right now it doesnt matter any number to the power of 0 is 1
1
I haven't seen it as 0 but I have heard somewhere I think in Math sorcerer that you can also extend the 0^n definition to include 0 and define it as 0
i think the only cases i've seen it treated as 0 is in some specific combinatorics identities
to abuse the terminology, it's almost always treated as 1
I'd say it's definition depends more on convenience than anything as Camilleone and others have pointed out
but how it is undefined ??
In analysis, you'd usually see 0^0 = 1 while in some some places like combinatorial proofs it is defined as 0
Look above at what Bueno said
0^0 = 1 
we're breaking up if you don't agree

@haughty drift Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how is my answer wrong? i dont get it
it should be 2 hours 20 minutes
how are you getting what you got?
whut
(units)
it looks like you're doing random things and hoping for the best
last you have to divide 3 by 9
i meant distance divided by speed
why are you dividing 9 by 60 and what do you think that supposed to give you
by that point u gonna get ratio 1/3
sorry i dont get it
1/3 to 60
this is eqution is distance divided by speed right?
equation*
t = d/s
yes
no
i meant
divide
holy shit
this is why i got it wrong
so now its 2.333333333
whats next?
i know that 2 is equal to 2 hours
0.333333333 x 60
is 19.999999998
so round that off
is 20
is this correct solution?
@timid silo Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @deep pulsar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone explain me the nature of series 1 / ( (n+1) * ln^2(n+1) ) ?
$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{(n+1) (\log(n+1))^2}$
Ann
this?
no
oh? then can you write on paper what the correct series is
but that's the same as what i wrote...
sory 😄
i've tryed with some comparisons
comparison? ok, what did you compare to?
and which way did the comparison go?
idk i just said it is diverges
so you do not even know which direction the comparison between your series and 1/n goes?
how can you expect to draw any conclusions from it?
idk how to calculate this series, 0 idea
im at starting with series
you could not tell me whether $a_n \leq \frac{1}{n}$ or $a_n \geq \frac{1}{n}$.
Ann
i would say that this means you didn't actually compare your series to 1/n.
(i'm using a_n to denote 1/((n+1) log^2(n+1)) for brevity)
i think an >= 1/n
you're wrong
in fact it's a_n ≤ 1/n
from which you can at least conclude that the comparison with 1/n tells you nothing
so, how can i know the nature ?
i'd suggest Cauchy's condensation test
also we should probably reindex the series so that it's $\sum_{k=2}^{\infty} \frac{1}{k \log^2(k)}$
Ann
just for convenience
compare that ?
no, you are confusing application with proof.
cauchy condensation test says that if $f$ is a positive, decreasing function then the convergence of $\sum f(n)$ is equivalent to that of $\sum 2^n f(2^n)$
Ann
oh i will try, thx a lot
@halcyon socket Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @halcyon socket
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do we know its 1.7 on the x-axis
for mean = n/2 so 200/2 = 100
the corresponding value of 100 on the x-axis is 1.7, iam not able to mark it
from the graph
draw a horizontal line passed by 100
until it touch the graph
@timid silo Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Please help me find the length of side c
show your work
how much trig have you learned so far?
i would start with:
-divide the big triangle into two smaller right triangles
-I would put the line from the 60° angle to the longest side, such that we get two 90° angles
then get all the values in the upper triangle via trig functions
then do the same for the lower right triangle
Hint side c common in both right angled triangles
thanks so much, my internet connections vanished, i usually get stuck at this can you let me know how can i understand better because the second part is exactly going to be the same
i will open another channel
.open
looks like that didnt help
.close
i usually used to add my questions i am on my channel if that didnt work it means due to my network connections maybe
someone else claimed this channel, go and grab a new one if you need it
@wanton dune Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Help
?
What have you tried?
Sir long Musk what things have you tried till now?
Yes
Yes
Seems like
oh
$\log_2\left[\log_2\left(2^{x+1}+3\right)\right]=1+\log_2x$
oh i see
Strange
@coarse orchid Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @coarse orchid
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why is it different?
Is that chatgpt?
yes
I am just trying to convert the units
is it different to convert from
g/cm^3 to kg/m^3
than to convert from
kg/cm^3 to kg/m^3 though?
You don't need an ai to do that
Well, m^3, or anything to cube relates to volume
You'll just have a small number
,w 2 g/cm^3 to kg/m^3
,w 2 kg/cm^3 to kg/m^3
See, kg/cm^3 to kg/m^3 is larger than g/cm^3 to kg/m^3. Conversion process applies the same concept
It's supposed to be 8.8x10^2 kg/m^3
But I am getting 0.088kg/m^3, where am I going wrong?
unit conversion is essentially applying multiplication by 1
note that since 1m = 100cm
then
1m^3 = (100cm)^3
hence you should be multiplying by
$$\frac{(100cm)^3}{1m^3} = \frac{1000000cm^3}{1m^3}$$
or equivalent
ℝamonov
Aha, right, thank you
I want to find the value of uncertainty for this
By taking the log of both sides
So that I can follow something like this to find the error
Can anyone help me write the top equation in the format found in the 2nd picture 2nd line?
@subtle whale Has your question been resolved?
@subtle whale Has your question been resolved?





