#help-10
1 messages · Page 91 of 1
methods being how you will be proving it. Which properties of calculus or other mathematics are you using to build your proof
Ohh ok. Like the theorems I include later
yeah
It's been forever since I've learned calculus rigorously, but I think this actually needs to be proven
I could be wrong, so maybe someone smarter can weigh in.
It was kinda just skipped in the example I was building this off of
wdym
the professor didnt need me to have my own ideas about proving this from the ground up
so i learned about the few different ways, and one of the proofs that mentioned this just kind of jumped
for sure
If it's already accepted as true, that's fine
But if you have a reference as to where this truth comes from, it's good to cite your source
I'll just assume you plan to do that later
But every fact you write that isn't your own original thought should be cited
Even your historical notes
the whole thing is cited
Your prof may not require that, but objectively it would be necessary in the real world
okay cool
I shall read forward then
i think maybe im safe, in reference 1 their proof shows that its a basic operation of integrals
id like to show it better but idk if there is a better way of breaking it down. it was probably the part i felt the most insecure(not emotionally) about so im glad you noticed it too
Oh okay yeah I did miss the sources
I think f(c) approaching f(x) also requires proof.
I think it's a limit theorem
I wouldn't know sadly.
did it not make sense?
maybe i can explain it better
Just not sure how rigorous it needs to be
id lean on the side of more rigorous
comes down to audience
its a proof class
I'd def ask your prof to look it over if you can manage that.
not really
shame
Well for what it's worth, I didn't spot any logic errors
NICE!!!!
its fine i think i got the info
You know your audience better than me, so that's your call.
well then i think i only have one question.
do you think i should change the intro at all?
if you look up the article that i cited, its totaly a copy paste
the thing is it's history
idk how to take creative liberties on history
its just history
That's a tough one
I always sucked at that too
It's not "great," but I've read enough papers to realize that everyone basically does it
ok cool. well thank you for your help. i know what i need to do in order to get a decent grade then!!!!! thanks again!!!!
im going to close now, if you have suggestions pls pm me
im going to close now, if you have suggestions pls pm me
.close
Closed by @desert river
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@timid silo Has your question been resolved?
The period of y=cosx is 2π
So you can separate the interval into two ①[-2π,0] ②(0,π]
Interval ① covers one period so in this interval there are A roots
And In interval ② there are B roots
So the answer is A+B
You can draw the graph to check the value
Or you can think in this way:
Because -1<cosx=-0.5<0 so x is the angle in the 2nd quadrant or the 3rd quadrant
In one period,and in every of these quadrant has 1 root
So you just need to check the numbers of the 2nd/3rd quadrant covered in the interval
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do you simplify sqrt of 96 to get 4 sqrt 6
ik how perfect squares work
just confused
its been a whie since ive done htem myself
$\sqrt{96} = \sqrt{16\cdot{6}} = 4\sqrt{6}$
Polipoli ❤
noooo it’s okay hahah
It isn't the greatest perf square
happens to all of us
Thx guys
$\begin{align*}
\sqrt{96} &= \sqrt{2^5 \cdot 3}
\sqrt{96} &= \sqrt{4^2 \cdot 2 \cdot 3}
\sqrt{96} &= 16\sqrt{6}
\end{align*}$
no problem!
kappa
$\begin{align*}
\sqrt{96} &= \sqrt{2^5 \cdot 3}
\sqrt{96} &= \sqrt{4^2 \cdot 2 \cdot 3}
\sqrt{96} &= 16\sqrt{6}
\end{align*}$
```Compilation error:```! Package amsmath Error: \begin{align*} allowed only in paragraph mode.
See the amsmath package documentation for explanation.
Type H <return> for immediate help.
...
l.57 $\begin{align*}
You've lost some text. Try typing <return> to proceed.
If that doesn't work, type X <return> to quit.```
don't use $ around align 🙂
oh sorry that wasn't your message
oh that wasn’t me hahaha
@tranquil sonnet haha
I don’t know how to use those hahah
@worldly narwhal Has your question been resolved?
o
No
Can smeone help me
How the fuck do I do this
I get the math but
I don't know how to algebraically bring it down to the point where I can start the solving
bring it down to where?
Like
How do I make it have an A B and C term only
like x^2+6x+8
That format
How do I algebraically do things to the 4 terms
I need to make one disappear
is that just subtraction?
look at both sides of the equation
the first thing i notice is there's only 1 variable
2nd thing i notice is the powers of said variable are all integers
and the highest is 2
this means this is a quadratic
and moving everything to 1 side means you get = 0
so we are solving for 0, 1 or 2 solutions for m
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i need help w 2 pls
(a+b)^2 is not equal to a^2+b^2
i know, it's a^2+b^2+2ab
but there's no (a+b)^2
only (p-1)^2
and (p-1)^2 = p^2-2p+1
as in
u got rid of sqrts
u cant do that due to that 1+ on the right
ull also get a
+2 sqrt(stuffs)
so i need the +1 on the left or wat
sqrt(p^2+q^2)-1 <= sqrt((p-1)^2+q^2)
surely not tho cause i need it in the form
d(A,C) <= d(A,B) + d(B,C) i can't rearrange yeah
@rare pelican Has your question been resolved?
no i still need help
Then where's your 2ab term on the right side
.
can u go thru it i don't know
Why can't you rearrange
cause i need to show d(A,C) <= d(A,B) + d(B,C)
i'm not solving for a specific number
Rearrange to this after sketching out the proof
Then write your proof backwards
bro wat
pls show the process idk
i don't know the proof
my teacher done nothing on it
Once you have this term on the right, you subtract all your non square root terms to the left and square again
Closed by @rare pelican
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello
OH MY
Something is wrong here and i cant figure out what
lmao
nah bro u on u own there 💀
Its funny cause my solution pretty much ended up that 5 = 5
Without looking much I can say that always happens if you IBP one way then immediately IBP the other way
Because then IBPs cancel each other out
Instead break the integral a sum
The pure exponential is simple
The other one is a polynomial* an exponential, which can always be solved by IBP
yeah
idk tbh
i look over and over
So once you've committed to a direction for your IBPs, stick to it
i think there is some -/+ that is wrong
Maybe but it doesn't matter, you IBPed both ways and therefore did nothing
@bright scaffold Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @bright scaffold
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Does it make any difference if I use 1+a compared to 1+|a|
yes?
the proof would no longer make sense?
what if a was -2?
then you'd be writing that for all n >= N, |a_n| < -1
which is nonsense
|a| = a if a>=0
|a| = -a if a<0
@knotty nebula Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
if radius is given how do u calculate perimeter
perimeter of what
of the square
actually how would radius of circle even be related to perimeter / area of square
can u explain
you need to relate the radius of the circle to the sidelength of the square
stare at the picture for a while
The side length isnt given
diameter of the circle is equal to the length of the side
so 18cm
yes
so the perimeter is just 18 x 4
and the area is just 18 x 2
or do we involve the circle 2
what ?
i mean 18 x 18
yes
Ok so whats simpsons rule
I still dk what it is
then you didnt read what it was about tho
Ok whatever but to calculate area with simpson rule it is just h/t * (fo + f1 ... + fn)
what are the x points for h
@alpine raven
should we count even the missing sides like 5m wasn't written many times and on the polar opposite of 7.5m
we don't even have the expression of the curve to apply simpson's rule, but anyway I'm not that good in numerical analysis
@latent mesa Has your question been resolved?
Do you have a moderation problem?
Well it's been 15 mins without an answer from one so yea
Do not ping moderators for for mathematics answers.
Closed by @latent mesa
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is this a typo that is meant to be 3x^2? because I'm not sure what 3x2 would mean
Closed by @queen mica
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, i needed help with simplifying this
Wrong chat
1^ (whatever) is still 1
@mighty swallow Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @mighty swallow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can anyone help me with Q15
,rotate
ryuga hideki needs help
sorry what?
where is your name from
You could use binomial distribution
Wait no
Hmm
This feels like it needs a normal distribution curve
No setup is binomial so you use binomial
the topic is binomial, but cant figure out what values to use for the the p,q,k
Recall what those represent
i know n is 30, p should be 0.88? and q should be 0.12. but whats the k?
what is k?
the amount of successes right
maybe if we add some notation to this it makes more sense
$\text{Sales} \sim \text{binom}(30,0.2)$, agree?
ScapeProf
Hmm
And then the question asks to find $k$ such that $$P(\text{Sales}\geq k)=0.88.$$ However as with any discrete hitting exactly $0.88$ is not rly possible so I assume they are asking for the largest $k$ such that $$P(\text{Sales}\geq k)\geq0.88.$$
ScapeProf
I wont lie I'm too embarrassed to say I am lost rn.
With? Agree this is what the question is asking?
So the naive way is just trying. Is k=0 the answer? k=1? k=2? ...
what?
the method of 1-p(0)
like finding out the unsuccessful first then subtracting
from 100
thats called the complement
and yes calculating say P(Sales>=1) is easier by looking at P(Sales<1)
Ahh I think I'm getting it a bit. Would it be something like
1-(30C0)(0.0088)(0.9912)
no thats wrong
@floral socket Has your question been resolved?
I think I got it now. got the answer of 4 by the end
@novel knoll thank you so much for your help! I really appreciate it and sorry for wasting so much time on this.
Closed by @floral socket
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
It has to be the equation of lenght of a line in a 3d base ( i might be wrong tho )
@spice sluice Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
rishi e
2 I N_0
I is incenter its that cyclic sum
and you were given that N_0 is 1/2(x^2 + y^2 +z^2)
2 times that product
1/2 will cancel
@spice sluice Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i don't understand how we got the second line
riemann
dont convert the exponentials to trig
just literally expand both those brackets and combine like terms
combine the $e^{i\varphi}$ and $e^{-i\varphi}$ terms separately
ΣAC
your second term has the exponentials flipped, either unlfip them or get rid of the negative out front
Closed by @weary ginkgo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is this true only for $A=\pm I_n$ where $A\in\mathbb{R}^{n,n}$
ta
for example
Gijs
$\left[\begin{array}{cc}
0 & 1 \
1 & 0
\end{array}\right]$
Gijs
Closed by @stable iron
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Show that if $\left( x_{n} \right)$ is sequence of real numbers and $\lim{\left( x_{n} \right)}\neq 0$, then $x_{n}\neq 0$ for all natural number $n$
Welf
What? Am I missing something? This seems obviously false
0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ... is a sequence of real numbers whose limit is not 0, but it contains 0
unless there's something obvious that's going right over my head
@long dove Has your question been resolved?
by terms given 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ... \
the sequence is $\left( n-1 \right)$ which is known to be divergent. Hence $ \nexists x = \lim{\left( n-1 \right)$
theres a $ sign
Welf
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
yes
sequence always start from n=1 since n in set of natural number
you're right. By that, the statement given is false since there is (0, 1, 1, 1, ...) doesn't satisfied.
Thank you @twin sapphire
.close
Closed by @long dove
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I calculate this? Is there a trick when dealing with fractions?
If I multiplied the first vector with the denominator and the second with the numerator, would the answer just be 1/3 times the vector product?
because I would want the vector in it's most simple form.
No i've just seen people use some trick along those lines
its just regular ol vector maths
I would rather deal with integers than fractions when adding or subtracting
just that the cordinates can be fractions
if you dont want to deal with it you can just factorize by 1/3
the whole expression
but i think you can manage
subtratinc 2/3 to integers
Closed by @bitter timber
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed by @patent jetty
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

✅
Have I marked vector q correctly
For the formula
|(b-a). (p×q) |/|p×q|
@patent jetty Has your question been resolved?
@patent jetty Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi!
@haughty onyx Has your question been resolved?
oh sorry! I’m not sure where to begin for part (vi)
it's ok everyone does it and I'm just extra crusty
if someone could help guide the start it would be really helpful
oh hahaha sorry
well
I don't know what Q is
but I can make broad generalizations about dB/dt for certain value ranges
ok, so without this term at all (the one with Q in it), the population is in decline no matter what
eh, let's just solve for > 0
...except you're asking for help with the last one so nvrmnd
@haughty onyx what class is this for?
Which one
which one?
which class?
yes but a little stuck on actually sketching the diagram
so I thought maybe this came up in economics or ecological science or something
ohh hahah
why was this necessary, she posted work for 5/6 of the problem 
it's work to read these things
it's nice to know people who post them are still awake
(and she is and she sounds much more patient than me)
I can't solve this one. Dunno what bifurcation is and I can't find a quick lookup. Could you help her?
*"quick" = I can understand it
nope
@haughty onyx do you have any other examples of bifurcation diagrams from this part of class that we can look at?
Intersections in the graphs are stationary points
hi! not really I was only taught a little bit of theory of it
it's the intersections or something that you're looking for
yeah
basically the intersections in that graph are when you have dB/dt = 0
which one of those equations is the linear y?
and you can check the local behaviour by seeing which graph is above
that's enough to get a rough bifurcation diagram
ohhh
just think of the plot of two graphs f(x) and g(x) together as letting you work out f(x) - g(x)
because essentially what you have is like
f(x) = g(x) when f(x) - g(x) = 0
so they give the same information
ok, then all the linear graphs are the second y for various R, got it
Ig the points of bifurcation are the values of R when the number of stationary points (so the number of intersections) changes
bifurcation diagram just draws the intersection points
hmmm 
you might need to know which are attractive fixed points
I don't think bifurcation diagrams typically contain info about the stability of fixed points

depends ig
when i studied this stuff the unstable ones were drawn as dashed lines or something
why isn't that diagram what they are asking for? Isn't R the parameter?
Out of curiosity A Level further maths yea? Which exam board/level is this?
Rarely ever checked some of the higher level modules they have
this is the paper
cool stuff
you got good school


it’s hard 😭
fun tho
kind of yes
i doubt it
even if you open something that displays the viewers at the top right you're still anonymous unless your acc is an editor or something
Kk
dw you won't get unexpectedly doxxed this time 
@wild swallow does she just need to draw vertical lines demarcating the intervals for B?
ohh my teacher sent us that file
don’t worry hahaha
yoo wtf is this paper man
I did a project on that exact question in HS. Spruce budworms.
if anyone knows how I can start sketching the (vi) pls do ping ty!
ohh
what’s HS?
High school.
ohh you did this question in high school?
As part of a differential equations class, and as a group project.
ohh! do you know how I can start sketching the graph?
Let me pull up the paper first.
okay!
The paper I used used μ rather than B.
I can't say why this is what you are supposed to do, since that was 4 years ago.
But basically you solve for R and Q in terms of μ, then plot the points parametrically.
Wait, that might not be what your paper wants you to do.
@haughty onyx
hi!
I found tangents at R 0.384 and 0.560
but overall I’m not sure how to begin sketching it
Here is the bifurcation diagram my group computed. Though this is for R and Q varying.
Ak, I have something to do, so I'll have to head off.
how about B against R?
ohh okay! tysm for helping! :D
No problem. Sorry I could not help further. Good luck!
@haughty onyx Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed due to the original message being deleted
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

,calc 9-9/9+9-9/9
Result:
16
9 - 1 + 9 - 1
ive seen quiz website math questions, roblox math questions, and now tiktok math questions

are you in grade 1

peak math education courtesy of K12

i don't know if you asked "what does the word 'unambiguous' mean?" or "what does your use of 'unambiguous' refer to"
what is your native language?
oh nice i can speak a bit
don't ask questions like "are you in grade 1" towards people who are trynna learn
hm. i can't find the Arabic translation for the word
it translates to something like uhh
like ive seen you say similar remarks in other channels
hmm
but it's just unnecessary 🤷
"خالية من الغموض" معنى الكلمة على ما اعتقد @cerulean sequoia
order of operations says so
but anyways
there's that thing called BODMAS
PEMDAS
or whatever
BODMAS or PEMDAS or some more regional variations.
brigham young university moment
😒
yeah I did GCE A Levels so
you all have silly attachments to particular acronyms
no
whatever the binary op x is performed first yeah
.close
if you dont have a question to ask then close the channel
Please don't hog the channel
#chill and #discussion exist for that
neither of them care, they both said the N word and continue to do whatever they are doing right now
oh the other guy is already banned
nice
How did that one dude get banned when alenciaga posted a video of someone screaming the N word
not sure
also had a PP being flashed
there is only one moderator on
but will ping again
<@&268886789983436800>
tfw mods have logs
okay finally
.close
Closed by @native knoll
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do i solve this
might have to elaborate a bit unless im missing something
this is the formula for the electric field due to a dipole on the axis
Here p is the unit vector
From -q to q
That doesn’t answer the question; what are you trying to solve?
I want to simplify this
looks really simple to me tbh, you have removed the constants and are left with the variables inside/
Yeah but idk how they simplfied it in the book
so you want to simplify the original equation to what you posted?
ah I see
yeah I mean the just factored the constant out
and then common denominator stuff
of the inside
to get 4ar
Closed by @whole dock
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
looks similar to perihilion and aphelion velocity equations O_O
weird how everything is similar :DD
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I realized when proving things, when we have for every e > 0, a <= b + e, then a <= b, can we just say "since e > 0 is arbitrary..." we have a <= b + e implies a <= b instead of having to prove why this is the case?
@wise talon There's a theorem from Abbott I found
Oh show me
kk
I'm familiar with that book
Let me screenshot it
Don't have it on top of my head, but it's definitely in there. But, the theorem was exactly this: https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/2496174/what-does-epsilon-0-is-arbitrary-mean
Ah
epsilon > 0 arbitrary means
we can literally just pick anything
for example I can choose eps = 1
or eps = 23918408230480238423
or eps = pi
as long as it's > 0
are you talking about theorem 1.2.6
Yeah
$a = b \iff \forall \epsilon > 0 |a-b| < \epsilon$
DerpZ
that's sort of what we're doing here
with that contradiction just now
so the gist is that U - L < eps means that
U >= L
Yeah, so instead of having to do that contradiction, once we proved it, can we just say "Since e > 0 is arbitrary..."
Well you need to check with your prof if they're okay with you skipping steps
If you understand it I don't see why not
The contradiction we showed was because you were asking why we can just directly conclude it
We filled in the missing steps
Alright, yeah, that is my question. Like I understand the proof, but I was just wondering once you proved it, if it's okay to go from point A to point B instead of having to fill in the gaps. I'm self studying this btw so I can get ready for analysis when I have to take it
Because it seems like a lot of proofs don't explain how they go from point A to point B as we discussed because they already proved it somewhere else
you prove it then quote the result later
If you're taking an exam you could probably
Alright, just quote it
well if you're writing a book that's what you'd do
prove it once and then quote it in all subsequent uses

if you're writing a good quality book*
btw if they do ask you to verify you should verify
That part where they go from e > 0 is arbitrary, to this proves that U <= L, did they not quote it because it was really trivial?
well depends on the level of rigour you're aiming for
yup that is trivial
you might say "ah that's a trivial property of the real numbers ofc that must be true"
but then at the same time it really isn't a trivial result
because once you leave the reals it might no longer be true
luckily it's real analysis but yes
yup
also
interesting that you are at integration
doesn't real analysis go like
sequences serieses functional limits
etc
I actually took real analysis awhile back and studying for real analysis II. real analysis I was a huge struggle so that's why I'm studying it early before I take the class
ah
Hi
well it's real anal
lmao yep
if you're about to ask for help
What , you're having sex?!
please do not
@wise talon @wild swallow thank you! 🙂
Dream
.close
Closed by @dawn vigil
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
LOL

.reopen
gottem
that is such a good one
So sad that math is ligma

Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
if 0/0 is 0, is 0^0 also 0?
k^0 = k/k, therefore 0^0 = 0/0. but you arent allowed to divide by 0, so 0/0 or 0^0 are not defined
Not what I asked
Not all false implies all other false
now
3+3=5 dosnt means 5*58=8
what
Let me demonstrate?
3 + 3 = 5
6 = 5
0 = 1
5 * 58 = (1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1) * (8 + 1 + ... + 1) = 1 * 8 = 8
easier way:
Idk which class of formal logic you've gone through
Yes, 0/0 = 0 -> 0^0 = 0
So 0^0 would not be 1?
no...
Well, no
Again, since false implies false you can have
0/0 = 0 -> 0^0 = 0
0/0 = 0 -> 0^0 = 1
There's no proof for 0/0 = 0
0/0=0(1/0)=0z=0
but if you limit 1/x when x go to 0 it goes to infinite
xD
0/0=0 in a extension of the complex numbers I’m working on
Similarly you can say that 0/0 = 1 because a/a = 1
That’s just a factual statement
Not arguable
Again, you're forgetting to account for the fact that you can't divide by 0
Right, how exactly are you defining division by zero such that you don’t force 0=1?
0/0=0, 1/0=z, 2/0=2z 3/0=3z etc
With z being a new dimension & number
But again this isn’t too relevant

No?
In mathematics and logic, a vacuous truth is a conditional or universal statement (a universal statement that can be converted to a conditional statement) that is true because the antecedent cannot be satisfied. For example, the statement "she does not own a cell phone" will imply that the statement "all of her cell phones are turned off" will b...
Long story short: it does, you can derive anything, true or false, when you assume a falsehood to begin with
You can stipulate whatever you want in your own number system, but I don't think anyone would be familiar with it as to help you answer anything
That's not the purpose of these help channels
It doesn't help that your number system is not and will never be well defined
I mean I told you the only relevant part of the question
If you want to derive something in math, every step of the way of your reasoning is, or should be, relevant
My reasoning z*0=0
What's z?
Moreover, do multiplication (*) and the symbol 0 carry any special meaning that is unconventional?
These are all very important things to know
It’s a new number
That happens to also be a unit of a new dimension (kinda like i)
I don’t think so
Ok, what are other properties of this z? Right now it doesn't seem very special, since I can come up with other numbers that do the same thing: 1 * 0 = 0 for example, or 69420 * 0 = 0
This also would imply z = 0/0 but you've decided its 0 and only 0
So z=0 wow!
z is 1/0
Divide both sides by zero, which you are supposedly allowed to do in your number system
Not valid because 0/0≠1
That does not invalidate the ability to divide by zero in your system
It bewilders me that you can hold so many contradictory ideas in your head

No but it dose invalidate that dividing both sides by zero keeps the value the same on both sides
It would be like saying 1=5 because 1•0=5•0
The symbol "1 / 0" doesn't make sense in our conventional number system. Can you please make clear what you mean with this?
one divide by zero
…but that’s exactly the point that’s been made throughout, you won’t have some properties like that
Does the symbol "1 / 0" indicate an object, such that you multiply it with 0, you get 1?
No
Well thats because if you have zero zeroths you have nothing
That is unrelated to what I was asking
My question is: If I multiply 0 with "1 / 0", what would be the result?
So it's just another symbol, "0 / 0"?
Think most of us are familiar with what happens when you ask Siri that question 
📠
No 0/0 is zero
Because you have no zeroths
0/0 is zero? 
That’s the first thing I said lol
…
Well yes because most people are working in the complex numbers where that’s not true
I’m working in number space (my extended version of complex numbers) where it is true
But complex numbers contains any other kind of numbers
If you ignore those other wonky complex complete numbers or whatever it's called
(q is i/0)
…can’t lie, this 0/0 argument has “we put man on the moon, so we can put man on the sun” energy, I’m just watching for the amusement 
Ok…
$\frac{0}{0} = \frac{2\cdot0}{0} = 2$
edwardborn
No
Yes!
I'm starting to think that the object we're exploring is similar to the Riemann sphere
0/0
You do the math! (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
Not even close
In mathematics, the Riemann sphere, named after Bernhard Riemann, is a model of the extended complex plane: the complex plane plus one point at infinity. This extended plane represents the extended complex numbers, that is, the complex numbers plus a value
∞
{\displaystyle \infty }
for infinity. With th...
Can you then explain to us which step in that calculation is a false assumption?
Hmm ok, so what would be the reciprocal of z?
The idea you can factor out 0
Because again 0/0≠1
Ah fair
1 / (1 / 0) = 0?
Let me check my notes on that one
Yea
Ok... And 2 / (2 / 0) = 0 also?
Yes
Do you agree that 1 / (1 / 0) * (1 / 0) = 0 * (1 / 0) = 0 / 0 = 0?
Yes…
But do you also agree that 1 / (1 / 0) * (1 / 0) = 1?
We're just multiplying and dividing by 1 / 0
No
1/(1/0)=0
0*z=0
Just because there are two valid ways to evaluate an expression doesn't mean you can reject one
Here you're saying that 1 / z = 0, so does that mean 0 * z is actually 1?
If we multiply both sides with z
@wide star Has your question been resolved?
Well it's oddly hard to think of a counterexample for 0/0 = 0
Maybe it actually doesn't break math if you define it that way
So I guess the answer to this is
Probably
No
Thanks

@wide star Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @wide star
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So for y lower limit shouldnt it be ,-square root of (4-x)
But in the solution ,why is the lower limit 0?
@wild orbit Has your question been resolved?
@wild orbit Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
yeah
one of this is possible
the rest have too many handshakes, more than it's possible
just check every one
very good
We use permutations here right
that's the exact opposite of what it is, that's very accurate in some math sense
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello
you need me?
awww
btw just post the question
no need to wait for someone to come
Can u do similarity maths? Similarity Geometry
Class 9
just post the question
,rccw
Find the unknown areas
Similarity maths
Let me write the question
In this , Find the unknown area A
I mean in the first rectangle we need to find the A
Trapezoid?
Yes
Do u know if they’re similar trapezoids
Areas of Similar shape
Ok
I dont think they r
they should be
Yes the answer is 12cm²
otherwise you can't do anything to it
Yes
Yes yes





