#help-10
1 messages · Page 89 of 1
thank you, i think i got it. am i supposed to proceed like this?
,w int 0 to pi/2 of |sin(x) - cos(x)|dx
looks good
Closed by @woven quartz
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help, please. this should be a fairly simple LPP, however i got it wrong
i) the feasible solution should be at a corner
ii) 2y-x is to be maximized, so i need to check which corner point has the highest value of y and lowest value of x
that gives me (2,7) as the feasible solution. where did i go wrong?
@woven quartz Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @woven quartz
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
idk
you're just supposed to differentiate all the choices and see which one equals f(x)
ew
oh i guess you can also use u-sub on your integral
try u-sub here to see if it's equal to any of your choices
you can check your answer by doing this
probably only takes like a minute to differentiate each choice
@low pagoda Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @low pagoda
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
would this be 10?
yea
@low pagoda Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @low pagoda
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
,w d/dx -arctan(x-2)
I think the first time I did the problem I chose D because I forgot to distribute the negative
you dont actually need to integrate
you can just differentiate the possible answers
work smarter
not harder
@rigid lintel great minds
think alike ❤️
@low pagoda Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @low pagoda
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what happened in the first question
they made the substitution u^2 = 4-x^2
you can think of it as u = sqrt(4 - x^2)
except i think that needlessly overcomplicated the question
u = 4 - x^2 works fine
the integrand becomes (4 - u) u^(1/2) (1/2) du
no
how are you getting this?
u = sqrt(x) - 1
=> du/dx = 1/(2sqrt(x))
correct
but you are changing variables from x to u
you don't want to keep any x's in your expression for dx
you want it in terms of u and du
yes how do i change the x inside the sqrt?
use your definition of u
u = sqrt(x) - 1
so can you rewrite 2sqrt(x) in terms of u?
Closed by @hollow grail
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
translate it to English if u don't are Brazilian to know what it mean
Ah yes I can see the pixels on the letters. This is also 3 pages of questions, what is your specific question?
6
screenshot and send one question only. your images are too small to read.
Okay now we wait for our philanthropic Portuguese friends to come translate this for us
Lol
here this in english
- Mark the TRUE alternative.
a) The number 1 is multiple of all numbers.
b) The set of dividers of a number is infinite.
c) The zero number is a divisor of all numbers.
d) The set of multiples of a number is infinite.
@uncut karma Has your question been resolved?
@uncut karma Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is the black-scholes equation considered a linear differential equation
linear in what variable
umm
im not sure tbh
im just doing an essay
on linear and non-linear differential equations
ohh
where V is the price of the option as a function of stock price S and time t, r is the risk-free interest rate, and {\displaystyle \sigma }\sigma is the volatility of the stock.
So in this case yes it is linear
what was said in the {}?
should follow this for the definition of linearity:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linear_differential_equation
just the bottom sentence right below
ahh okay
$\displaystyle \sigma$
riemann
Closed by @warm olive
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
heep
I tried summing twerk but i can figure it out
i tried putting the pivot on the left side since i think im trying to find the force of the fulcrum
I know the answer is 8.33% i just need help figuring it out
i tried this
$\tau = r \times F_{fulcrum} - r \times F_g$
allarkvarkk
the one without shit would just be
$0 = 0.25F_{fulcrum} - 0.5mg \text{ and } 0 = .24F_{fulcrum} - .5mg$
allarkvarkk
I got no clue how to do this
you're making this way too complicated
what's the two lengths of the two arms when the fulcrum is in the centre
vs
what's the lengths of the two arms when the fulcrum is shifted by 1cm
center is .25 and .25 and shifted is .24 and .26
and what happens to the torques when the scales are balanced in both cases
and why are your equations 0.25F_{fulcrum} - 0.5mg if your arm lengths are 0.25, 0.25
i moved the pivot because i cant figure out how to do it when its in the middle
because if it is
$.25F_g - .25F_g = 0 \text{ and } .24F_g - .26F_g = 0$
allarkvarkk
the easy way to do this is to think that when scales are balanced torques on both sides are equal
ye like that
obviously you can't have the same variables
the entire point is that since your fulcrum moved one of the weights must adjust
oh is that what the question is asking
omg u right
$.25F_g - .25F_g = 0 \text{ and } .24F_g - .26F_{g_2} = 0$
like this?
allarkvarkk
ye, and find g2 in terms of g
well one in terms of the other, and the larger one is the counterfeit value
Fg2 = .24/.26 Fg
i got it to work only one way though
nvm got it
says marked up
by bad im sorry i went a little stupid
thank you so much
.close
Closed by @inland matrix
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How can you find the equation of a parabola given the vertex and the x intercepts
A parabola is composed of two linear factors of the form (x-a) and (x-b). a and b are the roots of the polynomial, ie. the x-intercepts.
Now that parabola can be compressed or stretched vertically by some constant k. You can use the vertex to determine that constant k.
Kookiemon
How can i find the constant k
Can you help me
The x intercepts are
x1 = -3
X2 = 6
you can plug in the coordinates for the vertex into the equation and isolate k
I dont understand what the x stands for
look at the equation Kookiemon gave you
fill it out with what you have
they explained it quite well
y = k(x+3)(x-6)
well, but you know x and y right?
X and y of the vertex?
Plug it back into here now that you have k
y= 20/81 × x^2 - 20/27 × x - 40/9
You don't need to expand it
Wow ok
Ok
I tried to find it
With the formula
y= a( x-h)^2 + k
But it didnt work
Shouldnt i use that
You can still use that
Instead of 40/9 it showed 20/9
Anyway ill try and do it gain
To see if i made a mistake
Thank you guys
.close
Closed by @dusky lichen
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I got x = pi, but the textbook answers have x = pi/2 x = pi, 3pi/2
I solved cosx = -1 which doesn't match the other two
show your work
sec^2x
how do you know?
It is an identity that we were supposed to memorize
sin^2 + cos^2 = 1
(divide through by cos^2)
tan^2 + 1 = sec^2
i had trouble keeping it straight until i realized that
hopefully that helps
huh interesting, I do always have problems remember the 3 inverse pythagorean identities so that will help
tysm
when you divide by cos(x) here, you first have to say cos(x) is not 0
factor, don't divide
riemann
so now use the zero product property of two numbers: ab=0 implies a=0 or b=0
ahhh
okay that makes much sense
tsym I got it
I appreciate the help
If I have another question do I ask here again
ill just do
Work.
I know thags wrong but i was going somewhere ?
Just get stuck with these seemingly unsolvable equations and I’m stuck
I changed it all into sine now I’m here
just factor out sin
you just need to start all over
solutions to these problems should not be more than 3 lines
Will do
factor out sin
That tanx supposed to be squared
Okay I got it
It does work like that
Thank you
Okay so then this one as well
I tried solving this via QF but I can't get anywhere because it is a nonreal answer
,rotate
,rotate
@hallow umbra Has your question been resolved?
I’m following mathway
But there’s gotta be a simpler way to to do this no?
,close
.close
Closed by @hallow umbra
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed by @west field
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Very confused
@ruby wave Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Question about finding vertex from standard form for quadratics
is it -b/2a
or -(b/2a)
because if i have a negative for both b and a, does it cancel otu and they both become postiive and the number is positive or does the whole thing stay negative always
so if my problem was
y= -2x^2-4x+5
what would the vertex be
Apply that formula
im 90% sure its wrong
when i calculate it i get -1, 13
but on calculators like photomath it shows -1,7
when i calculate it i get -1, 13
How did you get this?
-2(-1)^2 = 4
-4(-1) = 4
4+4+5 = 13
i messed up somewhere
-2(-1)^2 = 4
Explain
-2 times -1 is just cancelling the negatives so ti becomes 2
2 to the power of 2 is 2 squared so 4
would it be then -1^2 so
-2 times 1
so -2 + 4 + 5
so the coefficient waits until exponent is done first
Yes
Closed by @storm vale
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Guys pls I hope the image works
Ah bet, anyways: so like I'm supposed to ig estimate the values of c and like I got this far
And I'm realizing I could just like idk, take a guess to see what happens
It says estimate in the question after all
you could mentally draw a line like this
1/6 is such a small slope 💀
so theres multiple possible values of c
Not 6 cus that's where the horizontal thing is
That's the local min, I know it's hard to see it's okay my drawing skills are 💀
BUT TYY
.close
Closed by @meager hull
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
sorry the what
6 works
or 6 and bit
6.2
Yeah it just can't be 6 on the dot cus horizontal tangent line is 0
.close
Yeah it's closed alr
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone help make this formula excel friendly? = (1/3)πB2*(C2^2+C2*D2+D2^2)
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
Don't open multiple channels
.close
Closed by @nocturne minnow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone clarify this
so basically the error term for taylor series if its 0 it just means the series converges to f(x) as n goes to infinity as the function we're trying to estimate has 0 error?
yes if the error term goes to 0 then the series converges to the function but no the function doesnt have 0 error (it doesnt mean anything for a function to have an error in itself)
i dont understand what you mean by the 2nd part that the function doesn't have an error
am i supposed to just say that the approximation doesn't have error
ohh i see what you mean
yea i see why it makes 0 mathematical sense
well thanks man
apprecaite it
.close
Closed by @ancient stag
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can i have help with calculating ratio, im stuck on the translation part
@hushed olive Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @hushed olive
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
"A fair dice is rolled twice consecutively. If this experiment is carried out 450 times, how many times will it at least a multiple of 3 be obtained."
..on average, right?
you can't give a definitive answer to something that's probabilitic
This is my current work
.
.
Since there are only two multiple of 3 in the dice, the probability I will get it is 2/6 and if I do it twice it will become 4/36 or 1/9.
If it is carried 450 times. I have to multiply 1/9 with 450 to get the answer.
But the answer from my teacher is 250.... Is it actually 250 or 50?
first of all unless your question specifies on average the answer is undefined
because you can't predict the future :p
then let us assume you're calculating the number of pairs that contain at least one multiple of 3 on average
if you only roll a dice twice, what's the probability at least one of them is a multiple of 3?
Hmm I'm not really about this
This is from what I learned
this calculates the expected number of times both dice have a multiple of 3
you want at least one of them, not just both
Ah I see
a nice trick to know is when you're asked about something happening at least X times
think about the scenario where it doesn't happen (the complement), which is sometimes easier to calculate
what's the probability that you roll 2 dice and you don't get at least one multiple of 3?
I dont have any idea😅
if you don't get at least one multiple of 3, how many multiples of 3 can you get?
1 ?
is 1 not at least 1?
alright wording at this point might become a problem 
if you want to calculate the probability other than getting 2 multiples of 3 or 1 multiple of 3 (these being at least one multiple of 3)
what's the only probability you're worried about
that's only for one dice
what's the probability to not get at least 1 multiple of 3 for two dice?
at leaset one multiple of 3 but yes
and now you can calculate the expected number of pairs with at least one multiple of 3 when you repeat this 450 times
P(at least one multiple of 3)= 1 - 4/9 =5/9
5/9 x 450 = 250 times
Finally understood it
Thank you very much!
.close
Closed by @sterile haven
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$$
\begin{tabular}{c|c|c|c}
p & q & r & \left(p \implies q\right) \implies r \ \hline
T & T & T & T \
T & T & F & F \
T & F & T & T \
T & F & F & T \
F & T & T & T \
F & T & F & F \
F & F & T & T \
F & F & F & F \
\end{tabular}
$$
is this right?
,w truth table of (p implies q) implies r
why is it true for p->~q->r
what are your brackets?
wdym
^ it is kind of vague lol
$(p \implies q) \implies r$ or $p \implies( q \implies r)$
Benjamin
oh i just meant p->q->r for the fourth column
then probably the first
clarification needed because apparently wolfie thinks it's the latter and conventionally i thought it's the former
better now?
because F-> T results in T
if p is true and q is false
i see
its very confusing
this is why instructors will yell at you (i assume your also did) to also include truth table columns for intermediate expressions
like write what are p, q and r
because trying to do everything in your head gets complicated real fast
dgh
like what are those
dgh
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
bybye
intermediate expressions
what's that
parts of your whole expression
i see
a column for (p=>q) in this case
@distant rampart Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey im in honors alg 2 right now and i was going to try to take pre calc over the summer and wanted to start learning now for fun. I was wondering on what i should try to learn specifically, i have this calculus book by james stewart.
Start off with trigonometry I guess
Yea this is what the course ill be taking over the summer has as the description
Trigonometry is like more indepth geometry?
@frozen token Has your question been resolved?
its basically tying angles and side lengths together
and trignometry is found basically everywhere where rotation is
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi can anyone help this question?
Use the exponents properties of
[
a^{m} \cdot a^{n} = a^{m +n}
]
♡LexQa♡
Yes
Closed by @winged crown
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello may i ask how to solve this?
do you know in general how to calculate line integrals
yes
ok, then what is posing you trouble in this one?
i dk how to find the x
what do you mean by "how to find the x"?
in my knowledge, I need to have the x and y equation to solve the line integral, and now I dont know what is the x
you need a parameterization of the curve along which you're integrating.
in this case, of the parabolic arc from (0,0) to (pi, pi^2)
it would be strange that you have only half of said parameterization.
oh so using x=rcos(theta) and y =rsin(theta)?
so like how I solve for a circle?
half circle I mean
no what
no
oh my god
what the actual shit
just because i said "arc" doesnt mean im talking about circles!!!
your curve isnt a piece of a circle!!! it's a piece of a parabola!!! parabolas aren't circles!!!
and you're overthinking it!!!
do you know how parameterizations of curves work in general?
I think it is 1/4 of circle
I guess not now
also, no, i will reiterate, parabolas aren't circles. NO part of a parabola is shaped the same as an arc of a circle. and no, you are wrong about your parabolic arc being the same as a quarter-circle arc.
your parabola has the very straightforward parameterization x = t, y = t^2 for 0 ≤ t ≤ pi.
ohhhh I got it
thank you so muchhhh
.close
Closed by @white jasper
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
um
well
ur main steps i think should be right
u prob just rounded too much early?
like in ur earlier steps did u round?
try maybe doing them to 4 or 6 sf
5 or 6
yeah i rounded to 3sf
yea that
u shldnt round to 3 as well if ur final answer wants 3sf
personally i would leave it as its exact values
eg leave it as sin65 etc
makes sense makes sense
but if u wanna round try to use > the amount needed for the final ans
4 is generally safe but not always
5 is quite safe
6 is if u feeling idk
very very safe
3 is pretty bad
aight ty <33
Closed by @stable rain
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
sup
is it 16 or -16?
it could be anything, also ping helpers only after 15 minutes
lol
nothing even comes up with those 4 exactly
seems like a copypaste or printing error ngl 
@gray topaz Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed due to the original message being deleted
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey! What does this notation mean?
$\int_{C}$
sentinel
I kind of made a guess when calculating, which was correct
Is it normal in integrals for them to be specified with a curve?
Yeah right, so it's 'normal' notation, to say, integrate f along C
Which is what it states?
yeah lol to the best of my knowledge yes (idk much abt line integrals), but unless it is maybe clear from the context that the integral is along a specific curve, it will be indicated in subscript like that
@topaz spruce Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need some help with this
what would the best fit line look like with and without Q
yes
q is just dragging it down
exactly
look its closed now
ok thank u
so then shouldnt the slope value change?
the sign is either + or -
okay so if you remove q its still positive?
the slope should still be positive with Q
ohhh okay
yes
Closed by @proud cargo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
[0,2) is a set
and y is a real number
so it doesnt make sense to say $y \neq [0,2)$
Gijs
do you mean $y \notin [0,2)$
Gijs
-1 is element of (-inf, 0) and f(1) is not defined
did you flip the positive and negative x haha
oh yeah
yes thats totally correct
hahah
not to be pedantic
but usually its written as
${f(x) : x \in \mathbb{R} without {-1, 1}}$
Gijs
${f(x) : x \in \mathbb{R} - {-1, 1}}$
alihsaas
ah
lol
@rigid lintel just out of curiosity
if i was to find range without the graph
what would i do next
complete square?
thats an interesting approach
i dont really think you need to do any algebra to find the range of a function
can u spot my mistake
cuz thats surely not correct
just curious
the red part isnt quite right
y - 1 <= -1 and y - 1 >= 1 is right though
so you can still make the right conclusion
so y <= 0 and y >= 2
but thats not true
since y cant = 0
mhm
im not sure how to resolve that
it definitely should
hmmmm
anyway ill have a go later
for this
does it have any horizontal asymptotes
since when x tends to infinity, we get infinity over infinity
which is undefined
at 4y(y-2)
you can just take y>0 and y>-2
no need to expand solve a polynomial, also you know y isnt 0 cause you took a=-y to solve your polynomial above
if you reach undefined or indeterminate form, use HR or in this case just take from the numerator and dominator the term with highest degree
ok cool
and secondly
to find the turning point
is there another way faster way rather than differntiating it
is turning point the point you get from second derivative?
first
ah so like the maximum and minimum
ye
don't think so, it is pretty much defined as the point where the first derivative is zero
i differrentiated
butwhen i plug in 0
its undefined
wdym
just a moment
how do i find the second one lol
i did he derviative
subbed 0
what else do i do
lmao
@rich tapir
wait
wait
wait
hold up
a minute
i made a mistake
by subbing in 0
instead of making it equal to0
but i still got the TP correct
how
now you know how it should be done 👍
ok i got the TPS
how do i know
which one is a max and and which is a min
from graph or table of variation
the question is to draw the graph tho
lol
table of variation
you study the sign of first derivative and see when f is increasing/decreasing, with the addition of asymptotes
actually I used the terms maximum and minimum wrong here, i apologize
wdym
i assume local minimum/maximum would be a correct, but not sure
so let's just go with turning point
got this so far
correct so far?
yah correct so far
idrk how to draw the othr one now
how did you draw the first part
plotted the tp
then just used the asympottes
to guide me
hows this
just like if you take x tends to 1-, the limit will go towards -infinity, take the limit as x tends to 1+
yah correct
but consider writing a table of variation, makes work alot easier
nice letsgooooo
ok ok
there was a lot of work
to draw that lmao
yah rational functions are a bit hard to draw at first
is this correct for the range?
yah right 👍
you're welcome anytime ❤️
does this graph have vertical asympototes
i dont think it does
cuz u cant make the denomiator = 0
yah but you have log
sry
log means ln
here
my uni defines log as ln
the process here says to make denominator approach to 0
and i did that
take x as it tends to 0+, ln 0+ goes to -infinity
take the limit over the bounds of the function, 0+ and +infinity
wait
lets go back a bit
could u read my definition and tell me if u agree with it?
^
yah i agree with it, but it doesn't really work here cause the function isnt rational
what does that part mean
dont really get that
but what is x tending to?
if that makes sense
so for example
say we have x/(x+1)
is the numerator approaching a non zero value here?
and how do u know
for the limit as x tends to -1, yah the numerator tends to a none zero value
so back to this. since this isnt rational, how would u find the vertical asymptote
what process
you look at the domain of this function, you see it is
(0, +inf)
you take the limit at x tends to 0+ and x tends to +inf, if a vertical asymptote exists, as x tends to 0+, y will tend to -infinity/infinity (specifically -infinity here)
a limit at x tends to 0 wont exists no?
since log(0) is undefined
acc
hmm
yah ln(0+) -> -infinity
and for x tends to infinity
would it be undefined
since log(infinity)/1+(infinity)
cant really do much with that
you use Hôpital's rule here
havent done that
derivative of numerator divided by derivative of dominator
i dont think we can use that here
as this question is from a chapter where we havent learnt it yet
acc i can use it uf u want
is it just this?
that's how it's done, don't recall any other way to solve this
what the derviative of 1 + modulus x?
cause x>0, it's the same as derivative of 1+x
^^
so whats the vertical asympotote
the vertical asymptote is x=0 and you have a horizontal asymptote y=0
you get a horizontal asymptote when limit to infinity ends up at a finite,
and you get a vertical asymptote when limit to a finite ends up at infinity/-infinity
yh that makes sense
wait so
can u always use lhopitals rule
like anytime
seems cool
only when you reach an intermediate form
what does that mean
and you must have a fraction
ight
asympototes done
and i got one intersection at (1,0)
not really sure how to sketch this
start with drawing table of variation
@silver plover Has your question been resolved?
should i do values from 0 to 10 for x?
0 to infinity
no u said to to table of variation
you never learned about table of variation?
like picking points?
and poltting them?
no you don't take specific points
you study the function over the domain
increasing decreasing
just a moment, ill show you how it's done here
ok
thx
@rich tapir it has an asymptote at y = 0
but intersects at (1,0)
how does that make sense
it increases to a maximum then decreases to the asymptote
but it intersects the axis at (1,0)
it cant intersect asymptotes
and we said y = 0 is an asymptote
it can if it is increasing to a maximum or decreasing to a minimum
yah that is correct, but make the curve stick more to the vertical asymptote
ight cool cheers mate
that was pretty tough icl
npp
table of variation came out to be more difficult than I expect
expected
for this function
ah rip
this is the table of variation of another function, but it's the same idea
you should also include the limits/asymptotes, i didnt include them
final question for this worksheet
would this not have any vertical asymptotes
since if u made 1 + x^2 = 0
its not real
yah it doesn't have any vertical asymptotes
would we use hopitals rule to find horizontal asymptotes?
with rational functions, you can just take the term with highest degree
from numerator and denominator
they both have same degree
1?
you take the entire term with its coefficients
dont really understand what ur saying soz
for example: ax, x is a variable, a is its coefficient
could u explain what u mean here
the term with highest degree from numerator is -x^2
the term with highest degree from denominator is x^2
(-x^2)/(x^2)
ok
then do u sub infinity?
for x?
as we wanna find what it is when x tends to infinity
simplify or you will reach the same result inf/inf
correct
so thats a trick then, with rational functions, u can ignnore everything else and just simplify the highest degree term from num and denom?
yes
correct
LESGOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
SUIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
SUIIIIIIIIIIIII]
SUIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII]SUIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII]
🫡
.close
Closed by @silver plover
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i cant find any answers on this online surprisingly
and i kinda need to know this
whats the difference between a point frequency table and a binned one
i thought they were the same thing but you need to use different formulas when calculating the measures of em
Ok so
the main difference is how they list the values
if you have a data set with the heights of 100 people, a point frequency table for this data set will list each value of the variable individually (e.g., 60 inches, 61 inches, 62 inches, etc.) and the number of people with each height.
A binned frequency table is similar to a point frequency table, but instead of listing each value of the variable individually, the values are grouped into "bins" or "intervals." For example, a binned frequency table for the heights data set might group the heights into intervals of 5 inches (e.g., 60-64 inches, 65-69 inches, 70-74 inches, etc.) and list the number of people in each interval.
The main difference between a point frequency table and a binned frequency table is the level of detail they provide.
ok second part
In a point frequency table, the values of the variable being analyzed are listed individually, and the measure of central tendency (e.g., mean, median, mode) can be calculated directly from these values.
In a binned frequency table, the values of the variable are grouped into bins or intervals, and the measure of central tendency cannot be calculated directly from these values. Instead, you need to use a different formula that takes into account the width of the intervals and the number of observations in each interval.
Closed by @coral wing
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
You're welcome!
credits: ChatGPT
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Yeah so use parallel-transversals laws
i was thinking its B
or another side would be the A-B line
like this
so would it be SAS?
that's what I'm confused about is the order the Sides and angles are counted.
Well why would angles JAB and KBA be congruent
That would only work if AJ || BK
That's not given
.close
Closed by @proven snow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I used the Pythagorean theorem but I think I'm missing something. Should i use derivatives?
@timid silo Has your question been resolved?
@timid silo Has your question been resolved?
I think Pythagoras is enough here
You could use the derivative to see the angle for the which the width occupied by the vehicle is maximum
How can i compute it with derivative?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
If
If
$A \subseteq B \ so \ B-A=B\Delta A$
Kingo