#help-10
1 messages · Page 70 of 1
answer should be a
after applying rule it becomes 1/(1/x) = x
Closed by @twin ferry
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I know how to solve limits without the trig functions but I'm stuck on how to appraoch this
can you solve
Modus
?
yea
so now
u know what arctan(x) tends to when x goes to -inf?
imagine graph of arctan(x) if you know that stuff
yep
oh i see
thanks
caan i ask one mroe uqesiton
I'm aalso stuck on this
I know the vertical asymptotes is when denominator is 0 for the x values
but i'm not sure about the horiztonal ones (maybe when numeraator is 0?)
so in this case there are no any
since D = 3^2 - 4(4)(2) < 0
to find H.A. examine limits
So vertical asymptotes only exists if the D > 0?
in +/- inf
and D >= 0 or D > 0
D >= 0 means quadratic has at least one root
so ye
wait I think I mixed it up
Ok so I know that vertical asymptotes exist when there are roots in the denominator right
And since D<0 there are no roots
so there arae no vertical asymptotes
correct?
yes that's true, also important thing is we can't have common factor in the numerator and the denominator
(they would cancel out)
oh is it only possible to haave 2 horizontal asymptotes?
yeah
Closed by @buoyant horizon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
confused on how to do b
solve for the kernel of A^T?
so A^Tx=0?
that'll set x orthogonal to the columns of A
Closed by @humble coyote
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how did they get rid of 9x?
9x = 0 (mod 9)
no problem 👍
.close
Closed by @primal matrix
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
And yes, I did have to draw this...
How do I find C?
Do I just add 52 and 46? (I think not)
Or do I add them and divide by 2?
Someone please help
.close
Closed by @icy cape
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how to prove this w induction?
0 <= m <= n-1
base case would be m,n-1 = 0?
its true for m,n-1 = 0
not sure what to do for inductive step
@coral marsh Has your question been resolved?
@coral marsh Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So for my work
The given was sin A = 15/17 in Q2
Sin B = -5/13 in Q3
so i used the pythag which formula is +- sqr 1-(sin)
and I got cos A 5/13
Cos B -4/5
but for some reason None of them are right and I just cant seem to find the answer
I WOULD be willing to go on voice channel for helo
@grim crater Has your question been resolved?
Both of those cosines are incorrect.
sin = O/H and cos is A/H which means the denominator will be the same.
if yyou go cos A = sqr (positive since in Q2) 1-sin A
That should be sin^2(A).
You could also use the Pythagorean Theorem to find the Adjacent side.
sin(A) = 15/17 = O/H. Adjacent = sqrt(17^2 - 15^2)
cos(B) is not correct.
how ?
,w sqrt(13^2 - 5^2)
Ohhhhhh
gotcha
yeah i see i took the oppisite rather then adjacent
i forget sohcahtoa sometimes
ok so my new cos B would be -12/13
👍
and For Sin(A+B) i get -140/221
That's what I get as well.
i think i got the rest I appreciate it !!
np
thank you so much
yw
@grim crater Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi I am unsure of how to do this problem, any help would be appreciated
do you know how to find lcms of expressions?
I thought you multiply the denominators
that'd be a possible common denominator
but its not the in the options (and ideally you'd use the lowest common denominator)
which goes back to my initial question
do you know how to find lcms of expressions?
e.g. would you be able to find the
lowest common multiple (lcm) of 4 and 6
what about something a little more complicated like lcm of
4x and 6x^2
No
what about lcm of x and x^2
No
do you know your exponent laws
Yes
note that x^2 = x * x
Would x be the lowest common denominator in x and x^2
4
you didn't say 2 here right?
Yes
you can pretty much apply the same principle as you just did to identify the lcm of x and x^2
Would it be 2x?
no
you said you knew your exponent laws and i also gave you
note that x^2 = x * x
x^2 = x * x, is a already clearly a multiple of x
the lcm of that and x will be x^2
I see
just like how 4 is the lcm of 2 and 4 since 4 is a multiple of 2
Okay
so for the lcm of all your expressions here, you can consider the constants and each variable separately and identify the lcms of
1,6,8
x^2, x^4, x
y^3, y^5, y
you mean y^5?
and the lcms of those denominators (the lowest/least common denom) would be the product of those 3 things
yes
Okay thank you so much
@stone sequoia Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why???
i cant see the question
lots of typos here
the ^2 you circled was actually supposed to be ^(1/2)
and the cos(x) is raised to the power of 1/2 and not x/2 as written
Closed by @zinc flax
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
For this question I got x=3.10 + (pi)n, neZ and x=5.05 + (pi)n, neZ but the answer key says that its x=3.10 + (pi)n, neZ and x=1.91+ (pi)n, neZ
,w 5.05 - pi
but if I wrote 5.05 in my general solution instead of 1.91 would that be fine
@timid silo Has your question been resolved?
@timid silo Has your question been resolved?
@timid silo Has your question been resolved?
@timid silo Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
needs help to prove that this function is surjective or not?
Ig no but I'm not pretty sure,
anyone please?
there exists no integer x such that f(x) = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, ...
hence not surjective
but it's injective
@eager arch
yes I have proved it's injective but I was confused in second step
You got it now right? To prove generally you have to put dozens efforts but to disprove you only need to present a counter example
it's fine even if you write something like: f(n) = 7n has range 7Z which are all multiples of 7 but that implies all Z not multiplies of 7 are not in range.
Ahhh okay!!!
Thnx bro
.close
Closed by @eager arch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Could someone check if I have done this right? My answer is x = 3.4
How do i do that?
$-(a-c) \to -a+c$
♡LexQa♡
i got x = 3, gimme a sec im taking a picture of my work
Let them figure it out themselves
I’m redoing just now
sorry its sideways
stupid phone
anyway so you you forgot about the negative
so that 1 would be a positive 1, not a negative 1
do you understand though?
Closed by @frosty locust
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i have a question
how i simplify sin3a by using the duplication formula
sin(3A) = sin(2A + A) = ...
no
might be
but for higher multiples of 'a', it's pretty painful to derive formulas, it's better to use complex stuff then
@timid silo Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
,tex \trigsumprod
What the hell am I doing here?
Closed by @pine sail
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Ima just pretend I didn’t see this-
<@&268886789983436800>
<@&268886789983436800> this is concerning, can I get help over here lol-
gus
Closed by @hot hazel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How can i use sin2x and sin3x like identities to derive sin(pi/2)
wdym derive sin(pi/2)
I have an inkling they mean deriving the half angle formulas
uh sin(x/2)?
Maybe
sin(3x)-sin(2x)=2cos(5x/2)sin(x/2) 🥸
I meant to find the value of sin(pi/2)
Like to find sin (pi/6) you can use sin(pi/2-pi/3)
And use the sin(x-y) formula
How to do the same with sin2x
2sinpi/4cospi/4 ?
@cobalt valve Has your question been resolved?
I believe you meant something like this(this could be done using sin(3x) formula too) ?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is this correct?
,w integral of (x^3+1)/(x^2 +1)
Yes
Different value of C
1/2 is “absorbed” into C
Because 1/2 is just a constant

.close
Closed by @silver plover
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Expectation of that is 300 too.
100% chance of getting a 3 and another chance of getting a number between 1-5?
so you will always get a 3?
1+2+3+4+5 devided by 5 =3
3x100 is 300 so on avarage you get 300
what was the question?
it's still not clear where this 100% fits into this
what's the original wording of the question
i think he means that there is a even chance to get a number between 1 and 5, once u get that number you will get it 100 times in a row
@white cave Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
If a line intersects a plane at a point P, am I correct in thinking that there can be infinitive many lines that fulfills the same condition?
Yup you need at least two points to define a single line
Or you need some other kind of condition(s)
Ah okay
Does the same thinking apply if the point P is not on the plane, but that the line and the plane are orthogonal?
I think that there can be only two distinct lines then. Drew the normal vector and a point p. Unsure how to analyze these statements algebraically
I'm not 100% sure, I can't help any further
I tried googling this and coulnd't find anything relevant either. I'm thankful for your time, Nonna! I'll ask my professor later
@deep steeple Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi. how would this set look like on complex numbers graph and how does -z affects the graph?
earlier i have been doing only graph where z was positive so for example i changed |z-2-i| to z-(2+i) and draw a point on 2, 1i
You can just pull the negative sign out of the modulus to see the effect.
@proper ridge Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @proper ridge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help
prove QO = ab / a+b
AB = a
DC = b
AB |l DC || PQ
plz <@&286206848099549185>
Only ping after 15 m
if i understand right i can help you
aight thanks
No i don’t know how to solve that sorry
i can write wait a munite pls
you can easily prove that draw some parallelogram here it is
wha-
im getting a seizure from looking at that
sorry for that i am trying
@supple topaz Has your question been resolved?
i did it
there are so many similar triangles i use first aob cdo and after i use the doa and dpa
dpa is not a triangle
sorry dba
it is not clear i can try again clearly
ye i dont understand
ok i will come back
<@&286206848099549185>
first use that
these are same angles cause they are parallel
use similarity here
Corner CDO = Corner OBA
same to the other side
corner BOA = corner COD
now what
do you now this similarity
there is a ratio
if ab is" a "bo is a ratio of"a"
same thing in dc and do
k is a ratio constant
؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟
i am sorry i am trying to tell but i dont know how can i explaine this
you know this similar triangles
this is same
name them what
ratio of a
you can say for that a.k
k is proportionality constant
it is not important
where is the nearest bridge
i think the problem is mine i couldn't understand
but i didn't understand still you didn't understan where
where is the problem ask that
@supple topaz Has your question been resolved?
@supple topaz Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
All i need is the answer to this. I cannot seem to figure it out. Please help me out here.
I don't need to learn it or anything I just need the answer to it, thanks!
You can just use the finance feature of ur calculator if u dont want to know how to solve it
What is the finance feature and how do i use that?
the PV PMT thing if u have a TI84 just google it
if u wanna solve it normally just plug in the numbers
and solve for t
using the formula it gives
im not gonna lie I have tried to solve this so many times and just plug in the numbers to the formula but it has not been working.
So what is A
18000
what is P
12500
what is n
2
and what is r
6.25
is it 0.0625
replace each variable with the value you just told me
so you told me A = 18000 so replace A in the formula with 18000
I have plugged it all in before and whenever I do it gives me the wrong answer and I get a different question.
18000=12,500(1+0.0625/2)^2t
1.03125
yeah write the whole equation though
18000=12500(1.03125)^2t
ok now whats next step
should i divide both sides by 12500?
yes
ok now what do we do to both sides to remove the ^2
uhhh i actually dont know. do we divide both sides by 2 again
sorry give me a min i have to do something
all good
To get rid of a square you use the square root
urm id just use logarithms here
to bring down the exponent
so like
log(1.44)=log((1.03125)^2t)
and now what can u do
im not sure
u can bring down the 2t
so
like
log(1.44) = 2t * log(1.03125)
and this should be easy to solve
would the answer be 5.9? (since it wants me to round to one decimal place)
,w 1.44=(1.03125)^2t
yeah
thank you so much for the help. Iappreciate it
🙂
.close
Closed by @clever jacinth
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm trying to calculate the following probabilities from the Bayesian network. I've been looking at resources online but I haven't found anything where I understand the formulas/explanations. Thanks.
@pearl oasis Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
Use Bayes theorem
I know the formula for Bayes theorem but I don't know how to apply it to this problem
I don't know how to use it with these problems
Closed by @pearl oasis
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I've got a problem I don't even know how to phrase. To sum it up, say I have a plane $\pi$ and a point $A$ such that the point is not in that plane and the plane does not contain the $z$ axis. Let's say I divide the entire space in two sides, one that is "below" and one that is "above", and that's exactly what I'm struggling with. How could I define it?
3317
plane normal + dot product
Closed by @knotty birch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
z is complex , the weird word in is And and I need to find z the locus of z on the complex plane.
I tried to say z = a + bi and somewhat in the middle i got stuck
@mental sphinx Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what did you try?
I'm not sure how prove this
regular induction starting from e^x
and then for k+1 but
but I was thinking the chapter this question pertains to deals with eigenvalues, eigenvectors and determinants
so I thought if I could show the elements of this set were all distinct eigenvectors with different eigenvalues to some linear transformation T: C(R) -> C(R)
then I can claim the set in linearly independent
why would you need eigen values or eigenvectors?
is that overcomplicating it
just assume {e^x , e^2x .....e^kx} is linearly independant
and then prove
e^(k+1)x
is linearly independant from those
oh ok, I guess I was just making it unnecessarily complex
@twin sapphire I cant just say since {e^x , e^2x .....e^kx} is lin independant
so coefficients a_1 to a_k = 0
therefore 0 + a^(k+1) (e^(k+1)x) = 0
So a^(k+1) = 0 right
does that make sense cause it feels off to me
first off its not really equivalent
to the family being lineraly independant
and second
you should startt with what you want to prove
and use at some point your assumption
Ok I'll rewrite it properly
@molten cosmos Has your question been resolved?
ok thats what I was suspicious about
cause then this would work for linear combinations of elements of the induction hypothesis set
if it was right
you could prove anything
is linearly independant
by induction
you didnt use the property of the actual family you have here
at some point you gotta use it
talk about exponential
because if not
your proof stands for any family of functions
even linearly dependant ones
theres is no one property
like start with the linear combination
forget about this
just prove
that ak+1 =0
and then yopu will be able to use the induction property
because you will land on the sum up to ak
to do so maybe you can study the limit
of
the linear combination
since n > 0, e^(k+1)x can never be creates as a sum of e^x +.. +e^kx?
divided by e^xk
or is that also wrong
n?
yeah thats kind of the spirit
but you have to prove that
oh sorry n = k
Benjamin
what is that equal to?
lim when x->inf
i misswrote
its supposed to be
e^-x(k+1)
oh
on the left
so if you distribute the e^xk+1
you get
$a_{k+1} +\sum_{i=1}^{k} a_i e^{(i-k-1)x}$
Benjamin
oh the right is 0 because its a linearly independent set right?
since i-k-1 < k
wait
yea
wait nevermind
the limit is still there right
yeah
but remember
the whole sum
was assumed to be equal to 0
so ak+1 =0
we started from
assume there exists a_i such that
$\sum_{i=1}^{k+1} a_i e^{xi} =0$
Benjamin
so ffrom this
you multiply both sides by e^x(k+1)
and you evaluate the lim
which is equal to ak+1
but its also equal to 0
so ak+1 must be 0
and then by induction
all the others are also 0
I think I understand
but im not sure why do we do this?
and where did this come from
the idea
comes from the fact
that e^xk+1 is bigger
when x goes to infinity
that all the other combined
so if you divide by e^xk+1
or multiply be e^-xk+1
thats the same
you 'll only get the ak+1
that doesnt go to 0
divide?
I thought u said multiply
i forgot the - here
ah ok
ohhhhh
I get it now
thank you it makes a lot of sense, for some reason I thought I could always assume e^k summed with a power less than k would not add up to k+1
does this mean I cant assume some thing like given {x^1,x^2,} is lin independent then I cant just assume {x^1,x^2,x^3} is linearly independent
this is not the same though
because
the x are not in the exponent here
but yeah
if you have a family of continuous functions
such that
each element is assymptotically bigger
that all the previous ones
yeah the proof stands
and since its true for this family then yeah its true
like for example
ln(x), sqrt(x), x, xln(x), x^3 ,e^x x^x
are linearly independant
ok but your point is if I wanted to use this fact in another proof
I would also have to prove it first?
well you dont have to
but you have to have the right kind of functions
or you will be blocked when calculating hte limits
but yeah
ok thank you for the help
@molten cosmos Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how is this not infinity
wats the exponent?
why do you think it's infinity?
the exponent is inf over 12
so wouldnt whatever is inside to the power infinity is infinity
but the inside goes to 1
no
whats 1*1?
what why not
isn't it asking to use the (1+x)^x = e^lnx thing?
its one of those indetermite thingies endless shenanigans
1^inf form you need to assume limit = L and take natural log on both sides
yeah I made the whole function equal to y
then took the ln of both sides
Rearrange it a bit and you'll see a 0/0 form
Closed by @regal shuttle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What does the discriminant tell you about the nature of the roots of a quadratic polynomial with complex coefficients?

if you have a polynomial with complex coefficients then it will always factor into linear terms. So.... no idea
I guess whether the roots are complex or not.
yeah, if the discriminant is a positive real number then the roots are real
no
isn't the answer somewhere here? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complex_quadratic_polynomial
A complex quadratic polynomial is a quadratic polynomial whose coefficients and variable are complex numbers.
this is complex no
the thing won't work anymore
in that case it would be
well
I was wrong
u can't determine in it without computing thr roots in that case
I think
oh yeah, because b might be complex, so even if the discriminant is real, the root is complex.
Yeah. it doesn't tell you anything.
true
@trail musk Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone tell me what I’m missing?
How do I rotate
apparently the rotate bot is down anyway.
we're saved from the AI apocalypses for one more day.
Wolfram is too
The apocalypse is not my problem my math teacher is
right, so what are you trying to do?
You can factorise the numerator in ur final answer, some factors might cancel out.
Or you can take the LCM from the start instead of multiplying the denominators
I’m trying to factor it all the way down and simplify
I know I could of used the rule of two squares but this way wasn’t working for me so I’m trying to work it out
Multiply the second term num and denom both with x-1 in the original expression
What would you get?
Simplify
Umm
ya
Wow
Cool then
Okay thanks ,but also where did I go wrong on mine?
Nowhere
How come I got stuck simplying?
You can factor the x+1 term out from the numerator
Like cross cancel? You mean in the top right hand corner
Yes
$5x^2-4+x = (5x-4)(x+1)$
Exactly
Lol
No problemo
Closed by @velvet peak
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help with number 10
what i did first was get the vertex of f which is (-1, 2)
so i used that to get the vertex of m
which is (0, -5)
so i graphed it and it looks like this
so the increasing interval is supposed to be the left side right since its increasing
so my answer is x<0
but on the answer key, it says the answer is x>0
what did i do wrong
bro go to a different channel
Differnt channel.
Oh my bad
alg
..
Sorry
No, it’s fine.
@dense osprey Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @dense osprey
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can I somehow set up an equation and use summation and product whatever
A little confused as to what C means
yea it's really confusing
$\sum_{i\ge 1}$ means sum all $i=1,2,3,4,5$
$\sum_{j\le 5}$ means sum all $j=1,2,3,4,5$
Texit died?
dammit bot
but you can factor out Q(alpha_i) from the inner sum
sum_i [Q(alpha_i) (sum_j Q(alpha_j)) ]
then you can factor once more
I'm confused
Like what I was thinking was setting up a new quintic with roots alpha_i^2 - 2
And doing something with that
:/
.close
Closed by @ruby path
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
if you square the sum of roots and subtract the cross terms, you could get something like sum_i alpha_i^2
Closed by @ruby path
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
a question on oblique asymptotes. If I have for example y=|x|+(1/x) the asymptote is y=|x| but why is this true? I know as x--> ∞, 1/x --> 0, so doesn't |x| --> ∞? Doesn't that mean y--> ∞?
when x is really large, |x| + (1/x) is really close to |x|
cus 1/x is small
|x| goes to infinity as x goes to infinity, but that’s saying something else
@icy hare Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi, is this correct, and if so how do i progress from here?
they didnt
oooooo
Yeah okay just wanted a double check to keep my intense self doubt in check
Yeah
Uhh
U differentiated
Both terms in ur product rule
Like u took the derivative of both x and y in ur first term
Oh wait
Is it the stuff at the bottom? Thought it was a redo
Okay
But yeah seems fine
yeah its the bottom one
im not sure how to progress from here though
do you want to solve for y'?
Basically put all the terms that don't have a y' on the right and factor out the two terms that have y'
And the divide by the remaining expression where you factored the y' from
Yeah okay just do what I said
aidez moi s'il vous plait 😄
Une seconde 😄
je viens de finir de me doucher lol
i think that means im finishing my shower? hahaha
Yeah lmaoo
Oo I know a bit of Korean
Ehh half ig
My family's lineage is weird
Somehow managed to be fluent in Arabic, Turkish, Arabic, French, and Russian because of it hahaha
wtf hahahaha
i only know a bunch of random words in russian and a bit of french
well by random words i mean the lyrics to a basta song
Anyways let's see what u have done
LMAO
Wait can u rotate ur pics?
nani
Keep the y @hollow fern
I mean wait
You solved for it entirely
Okay I guess u took it the shorter wY
yeah i didnt really know what to do lol
Basically uhh
Okay let me write it all out eq
$7xy^6y' + y^7 + 4xy' + 4y = 0$ is what u have
♡LexQa♡
yessir
Make it so that it is $7xy^6y' + 4xy' = -y^7 -4y$
♡LexQa♡
♡LexQa♡
ohhhhhh
♡LexQa♡
U can do the rest I think
that makes so much more sense
Yepp
bien sûr :)
ill close it now 😄
Also really random @hollow fern
if that sok
But I just realised
hi
You joined discord on my birthday hahaha
feb 5th? 😮
Yep
Haha
Yes. It is sad that I am becoming an oldie and hitting 20 in like 4 months 😔
Anyways, was nice talking to ya
Have a nice day! :>
@hollow fern Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What is the angle DKB in a regular square pyramid with a square base and equilateral triangles on the sides?
Since all sides of the pyramid are equal I tried drawing DB and forming a triangle with sides x-x-x*sqrt(2)
thus being able to use the cosine theorem
but that just yields the result 90° (the answer is 45°)
90 is correct
Hmm, then the answer key is probably false
Thanks for the confirmation 
True. They most likely drew a perpendicular from K to the plane ABCD. Then found half angle K.
And left it at that
Closed by @vast wren
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
