#help-10

1 messages · Page 56 of 1

mystic fiber
#

he said u were able to make an expression of sum sort and basically simplify that whole lot of 31 equations as some variables can cancel each other out

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@mystic fiber Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@mystic fiber Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@mystic fiber Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

median skiff
obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@median skiff Has your question been resolved?

median skiff
#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @median skiff

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

#
Channel closed

Closed due to the original message being deleted

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

glass junco
#

I dont know how to go further with this question. The second picture shows what i have already tried. I am stuck on the integral part or all the steps i did are also wrong idk.

final thunder
#

I’m not sure what you’re trying to do but I would use integration factor here

#

Ah that’s what you’re doing,

#

Should get $(e^{-6x}y)’ = -3e^{-6x}(\frac{6}{x} + \frac{12}{x^2})$ just by using the formula

warm shaleBOT
final thunder
#

Which I guess is what y ou wrote down $$ e^{-6x}y = -3 \int e^{-6x} (\frac{6}{x} +\frac{1}{x^2}) dx$$

warm shaleBOT
final thunder
#

Okay now you have to do integration by parts
Split into two sums like you did

#

For the first one differentiate 3e^-6x and integrate 1/x^2

#

Then see if you notice something

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@glass junco Has your question been resolved?

glass junco
#

Aha i asked my teacher, integration by part will not work on this!

#

You need to guess a value and thats why its really hard

#

but thanks!

final thunder
#

It will work

#

The integrals will cancel out

glass junco
#

that will not happen because its x^-1 and x^-2

final thunder
#

Have you tried it

glass junco
#

yes

final thunder
#

Well WA agrees

glass junco
#

with you?

final thunder
#

Yea

glass junco
#

o damn

#

But i dont see how one of the two x will dissapear

final thunder
#

For the first one differentiate 3e^-6x and integrate 1/x^2

#

Do this

#

Leave the second integral alone

glass junco
#

i guess the second right?

final thunder
#

Second one will cancel with the first one after you perform IBP on first

glass junco
#

ok lets try

#

1/x^2 => -1/x^-1

#

you will need to again take the anti derrivative of that

#

so -1/x^-1 => -ln(x)

final thunder
#

?

glass junco
#

but yea i dont see it dissapear

final thunder
#

Don’t

#

Why are you doing it twice

glass junco
#

because after the first time the x will not go awa y

final thunder
#

Sure as I said just leave it as it is

#

And write down the integral you get after first round of IBP

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @glass junco

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

final thunder
obtuse pebbleBOT
final thunder
#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @final thunder

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

#
Channel closed

Closed due to the original message being deleted

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

timid silo
#

Yo

obtuse pebbleBOT
timid silo
#

So I have this exercise Im failing to solve

#

Basically I have a cilinder whose diameter is known, d = 2a

#

A person cuts this cilinder in half following the y axis and then makes another cut 45 degrees on the right, see pic

#

The question asks to find the volume of the piece that has been cut off from the cylinder

#

My reasoning is that we can find the area of a section (which is a half circle), and then we find a function that represents how that area changes between different x

#

So since the degree is 45 we know both lines are of length a

#

And also we know that depending on the x, the radius of the circle is (a-x) because y = x

#

So…

#

Since radius = r = a, we can make a function out of the half circle’s area

#

Which becomes A(x), because the radius keeps getting smaller

#

And then we simply use the integral to calculate the volume through the new found A(x)

#

But this turns out to be wrong… the solution is 2/3 * a^3 — no pi whatsoever

#

Anyone understands what I did wrong with my reasoning?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@timid silo Has your question been resolved?

timid silo
#

<@&286206848099549185>

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@timid silo Has your question been resolved?

timid silo
#

😭

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@timid silo Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@timid silo Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@timid silo Has your question been resolved?

forest sinew
#

having a really hard time visualizing the problem though

timid silo
#

The areas werent these of half a circle, but rather the areas of circular sectors… silly me

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @willow trout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

visual dirge
#

pls help as fast as you can
Lucca claims that in figure n there are n + n + n + 4 red squares.
5.4 You must explain why Lucca has re

picture:

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

Please don't occupy multiple help channels.

visual dirge
#

?

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @visual dirge

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

maiden epoch
obtuse pebbleBOT
maiden epoch
#

this question has our high school math teacher stuck

#

We're not sure where the error is

#

Answer is listed as 300/17 (not 100% on this but I remember it was a rational number)

nova bane
#

seems legit

#

let me just check it

#

nvm im stuck here too

maiden epoch
#

Makes sense

#

Our teacher got like a masters in mathematics and he's confused as hell

spice citrus
#

A = s^2 + 2w^2, w = (150 - 4s)/6
I think this right

maiden epoch
#

Yea

spice citrus
#

A = s^2 + (150-4s)^2/18 = s^2 + 150^2/18 - 2 * 150 * 4s/18 + 16s^2/18

#

Which is a quadratic in s you should minimize

#

17/9 * s^2 - 200/3 * s + 1250

#

s = -b / 2a = 200/3/(17/9)/2 = 17.65

#

Approximately

#

I think

#

Nvm

#

Edited it

maiden epoch
#

He left now but I'll take a screenshot of this and show it to him

#

Thanks

#

(I have no idea what I'm looking at)

spice citrus
#

Sry for not using latex I'm on mobile

maiden epoch
#

Yea the unicode writing is a lil confusing

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @maiden epoch

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

lucid flume
#

How can I show that this function is continuous at x=1 but undifferentiated?

kind hawk
#

well clearly the left part is not integrable

#

it's bigger than the function thats constant 1

sage geode
#

As x approaches 1

lucid flume
#

Oh, fuck

#

I think I get it

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@lucid flume Has your question been resolved?

lucid flume
#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @lucid flume

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

fierce mountain
#

Using the induction method , show that 3^2n+1 + 2^n+1 | 7 , any n ∈ N

eternal pond
#

For part e why is it a true statement?

untold flax
untold flax
#

I think you wroiei t wrong

#

wrote it wrong*

fierce mountain
#

I got it as homework

#

And i have indication

#

Somehow my professor gets it to

#

3^3n+2 + 2^n+4 | 5 , any n ∈ N

#

And i really dont get it

eternal pond
#

whoops sorry

untold flax
#

3^(2n) +1 + 2^(n) +1 do you mean this?

fierce mountain
#

no

untold flax
#

it's just wrong though

fierce mountain
#

Wait i'll send a photo

#

Maybe i did write it wrong

untold flax
#

oh you did write it wrong

#

ok well the base case is true, right

#

now second step of induction is to assume that the general nth case is correct

#

so now we just have to show that the n + 1th case holds

fierce mountain
#

oh bet i got it

#

i think

#

wait

#

Yes i got it

#

Thanks

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @fierce mountain

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

deep steeple
#

Reall unsure on how to solve this using parameters. Using Gauss-Jordan elimination I get that the second equation is just 0 = 0 and the first is the same. If I let y = s and z = t the first equation becomes -4x-7s-3t = 13, giving $x = -\frac{13}{4}-\frac{7s}{4}-\frac{3t}{4}$

warm shaleBOT
deep steeple
#

M friend and I both arrived at the same answer, however, I'm wondering, is there any conditions for the values for s and t?

#

Textbook isn't really clear about this

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@deep steeple Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @deep steeple

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

stone phoenix
obtuse pebbleBOT
stone phoenix
#

Not sure what the question is asking or how to approach it

hallow mesa
#

If the question

#

Was just

#

Find the domain where

#

X^2-4 has an inverse

#

Could you do this

#

@stone phoenix

stone phoenix
#

Let me try

#

but what does it mean by that it has an inverse

#

are you supposed to find the domain of the inverse?

hallow mesa
#

I think it means

stone phoenix
#

Ah okay

#

so the inverse of y = x^2 - 4 would be

#

let me do it rq

#

y = sqrt x + 2

#

i think

hallow mesa
#

Close

stone phoenix
#

sqrt x + 4?

hallow mesa
#

Sqrt is for both

stone phoenix
#

hm i was thinking but wouldnt the square root make the 4 into a 2 anyways?

hallow mesa
#

No

#

Because it is

#

Sqrt(x+4)

stone phoenix
#

Ah

hallow mesa
#

If they where getting

#

Multiplex

#

Then you could do that

stone phoenix
#

mhm

hallow mesa
#

And take the 2 out of the sqrt

stone phoenix
#

yeah

hallow mesa
#

Now just need to find a range for this

stone phoenix
#

so wouldnt it be

hallow mesa
#

Not the domain

stone phoenix
#

x > (equal to) - 4

hallow mesa
#

Sorry

#

One min

stone phoenix
#

ah ok

hallow mesa
#

Sqrt(x+4)

#

Will give 2 answer

stone phoenix
#

yes

hallow mesa
#

So you need to restrict the output

#

So it only give

stone phoenix
#

one answer

hallow mesa
#

The positive root answers

#

For example

#

If you have sqrt(x)

#

You can set that y

#

Is always greater then 0

stone phoenix
#

ah

#

Find a domain that includes the vertex for which the parabola y = x2 - 4 has an inverse.

hallow mesa
#

Then x^2 has an inverse

stone phoenix
#

ah

#

otherwise it is not

#

so it will be

hallow mesa
#

There are

#

Many domains that work

stone phoenix
#

x > equal to 0

#

or x < equal to 0

hallow mesa
#

Or 1

#

Not for the less

#

But for the grater is works

stone phoenix
#

yea

hallow mesa
#

So for

#

Sqrr(x+4)

#

-4 is when it is 0

stone phoenix
#

ye

hallow mesa
#

Do anything below -4 will have

#

Sorry I meant 4

stone phoenix
#

but sqrt 4 is 2

hallow mesa
#

When x is less the 4

stone phoenix
#

so it will be 2?

hallow mesa
#

Sqrr(x-4)

#

Will be 0

stone phoenix
#

yeah

hallow mesa
#

When x is 4

stone phoenix
#

yeah

hallow mesa
#

Below that

#

It won’t be defined

stone phoenix
#

yes

#

because you cannot sqrt negatives

hallow mesa
#

So it does not have an inverse

#

Below

stone phoenix
#

undefined numbers imaginary

hallow mesa
#

-4

stone phoenix
#

ah

hallow mesa
#

-4 is an inverse

stone phoenix
#

yes

hallow mesa
#

But below it no

hallow mesa
stone phoenix
#

yea

stone phoenix
hallow mesa
#

Yes

stone phoenix
#

for the domain of inverse of y=x^2 - 4

#

but what does it mean by includes the vertex

#

because in the textbook the answer for this question is

hallow mesa
#

Wait

#

You

stone phoenix
#

this is why i am confused

hallow mesa
#

Still have not

stone phoenix
hallow mesa
#

Answers the mini problem

stone phoenix
#

ah

hallow mesa
#

Remember

stone phoenix
#

turning pont of parabola

hallow mesa
#

The inverse really

stone phoenix
#

flip y=x

hallow mesa
#

Should be in terms of y

#

Sqrt(y-4)

stone phoenix
#

yes

#

oh yeah

#

because inverse

hallow mesa
#

And if y is greater then or equal

#

To to 4

#

Then x would be

#

What

stone phoenix
#

hm

#

when it is asking for domain that includes the vertex

hallow mesa
#

That just means

#

The turning point

#

Of the graph

#

Is included

#

Like you said

#

In the domain

stone phoenix
#

ah okay

#

so we should find turning point of y= x^2 - 4

#

as well?

hallow mesa
#

Well

#

If you include all

#

Numbers that are inverses

stone phoenix
#

Vertex = (0,-4)

hallow mesa
#

Yes

#

But if you just include all

stone phoenix
#

yea

hallow mesa
#

Numbers that

#

Are Inverses

#

Then the vertex

#

Will be one of them

stone phoenix
#

yeah

hallow mesa
#

Also

#

You know

#

Sqrt(y-4)=x

stone phoenix
#

yea

hallow mesa
#

And y is greater then or equal to

#

4

#

Not 5

#

My bad

#

So x is

#

Greater then or equal to what?

stone phoenix
#

-4

#

no

#

its less than?

#

nvm

#

4

hallow mesa
stone phoenix
#

because less than 4 is negative

#

*undefined

hallow mesa
#

Yes

#

But

stone phoenix
#

$sqrt(y-4) = x$

warm shaleBOT
#

Gr00by

hallow mesa
#

In the terms of the original function

#

If you plug in values

#

Less then 4

#

Then you get y values

stone phoenix
#

yes

hallow mesa
#

That you can get

#

With plugging values

#

Above 4

stone phoenix
#

yeah

hallow mesa
#

Hopefully that made sense

stone phoenix
#

a bit

#

not rlly tbh

hallow mesa
#

I think

stone phoenix
#

but if u plug less than 4

hallow mesa
#

I can show it better with a graph

stone phoenix
#

wouldnt it be

#

negative

hallow mesa
#

On Desmos

stone phoenix
#

yea

#

unless u mean with

#

y = sqrt(x+4)

#

because then

#

ah

#

i get now

#

OH

#

BECAUSE

#

X > equal to 0

stone phoenix
hallow mesa
#

Yea

stone phoenix
#

and then it is x < equal to 0

stone phoenix
#

so thats why there is two answers

hallow mesa
#

Yes

stone phoenix
#

x ≥ 0 or x ≤ 0

hallow mesa
#

Yes

stone phoenix
#

because of inverse and original function

hallow mesa
#

Ya

#

I’ll show with a graph

stone phoenix
#

that would be nice

hallow mesa
#

One min

#

See how when x is greater then 0

stone phoenix
#

AH

#

It is half of parabola graph

hallow mesa
#

You get one solution

#

Also

stone phoenix
#

because the inverse of parabola is always only one side

hallow mesa
#

In the future

#

You don’t need to do all the work

stone phoenix
#

yeah

hallow mesa
#

You just need to split it in half

stone phoenix
#

ah okay

hallow mesa
#

And that will be

#

The vertex

stone phoenix
#

so you can graph the parabola

#

or find the Vertex

hallow mesa
#

Yes

stone phoenix
#

through finding two x roots and then divided by two

#

then sub back into original equation

hallow mesa
#

If you don’t need to include the vertex

#

Then you get

#

x>1

#

Works to

stone phoenix
#

ah okay

hallow mesa
#

Cause it still

#

Only

#

On one half

stone phoenix
#

so the reason why this one was -

#

was because the vertex was in -4

hallow mesa
#

Of the parabola

hallow mesa
#

Sorry

stone phoenix
#

so if the vertex was (0,0)

hallow mesa
#

For the confusion

stone phoenix
#

then the domain would be

#

x > equal to 0?

#

or no

hallow mesa
#

That is correct

stone phoenix
#

because now I learnt the idea

#

so I can like use it later too and will remember it

hallow mesa
#

Graphing

stone phoenix
#

yeah

hallow mesa
#

Can always help to

stone phoenix
#

yeah

#

so if vertex is in negatvies

#

basically

#

it is two

#

x > equal to 0

#

and x < equal to 0

hallow mesa
#

That’s only true

#

If vertex

stone phoenix
#

has no y axis

hallow mesa
#

Is on the y axis

stone phoenix
#

yea

hallow mesa
stone phoenix
#

but if vertex is like (-4,-4)

#

then what?

#

you also need range?

hallow mesa
#

No not really

#

Just x value

stone phoenix
#

hmm

hallow mesa
#

Should I show a graph?

stone phoenix
#

yes please

hallow mesa
#

Ok

#

One min

#

Ok one minute

#

It’s uploading

#

Okay it’s done

stone phoenix
#

Thanks

hallow mesa
#

See how

#

When is x is greater the -4

#

It splits the graph

stone phoenix
#

yeah

hallow mesa
#

In two

#

Nothing to do with y

stone phoenix
#

yeah

hallow mesa
#

Just the x value

#

Of the vertex

stone phoenix
#

yeah

#

so

#

would the answer still be

#

x > equal to 0

#

x < equal to 0

#

or it depends

#

on the inverse of the equation

#

and what the equation is

hallow mesa
#

It would be

#

x>= -4

#

For this one

#

Last one it would be 0

stone phoenix
#

ah okay

hallow mesa
#

And in general

#

It depends on the x value of the vertex

stone phoenix
#

oh ok

#

so the x value of the vertex is what decides the domain

hallow mesa
#

Yes

#

Cause see in the graph

hallow mesa
#

The vertex x value

#

Splits the graph in two zones

#

Hear wait

#

I’ll show what I mean

stone phoenix
#

thanks

hallow mesa
#

Okay it’s uploading

#

See how x=-4

stone phoenix
#

yea

hallow mesa
#

Splits it into two

stone phoenix
#

mhm

hallow mesa
#

Different areas

#

So one side

stone phoenix
#

the left and right

hallow mesa
#

Is one of the inverse

#

And the other is the other inverse

stone phoenix
#

yeah

#

because inverse has to do horizontal line test

#

so parabola must be in hal

#

halkf

hallow mesa
#

Good job

#

I got to go

stone phoenix
#

All good

hallow mesa
#

In a minute

stone phoenix
#

thanks

#

that was good enough

hallow mesa
#

Sorry

#

Hopefully

stone phoenix
#

Dw i got it, and i can study a bit more on my own

hallow mesa
#

But you got the concept

#

Right

stone phoenix
#

yeah

hallow mesa
#

Ok

#

See ya

stone phoenix
#

cya

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@stone phoenix Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

stable rain
#

Let f(z) be holomorphic in a domain containing the annulus 1 ≤ |z| ≤ 2. Suppose there exists g(z) holomorphic in the domain {z : |z| < 2} and h(z) holomorphic and bounded in the domain {z : |z| > 1} satisfying

f(z) = g(z) − h(z).

Prove that g'(z) is determined uniquely by f(z).

drowsy grail
#

The answer is 37 dumbass

#

Tantalizing

wild swallow
#

👽

drowsy grail
#

Heck

stable rain
#

so i tried letting F, G, H be the analytical continuation of f, g, h respectively on C and they all satisfy F(z) = G(z) - H(z) due to theorem of isolated zeros in some domain that contains a point of accumulation

#

not sure what else to do :c

wild swallow
#

what do you think

#

theres about 1 theorem

#

in total

stable rain
#

no i wasnt thinking

wild swallow
#

that relates derivatives to the functions themselves

stable rain
#

i was doing jordans lemma

#

so um

#

how do i specify contours

#

like i did

#

C_R = {Rt - R(t-1): t in [0,1]}

#

...

#

i q is being auto modded

#

S_R = (Re^(qi): q in [0,pi]}

#

then i proceded to use em as contours

#

does that work?

wild swallow
#

thats

#

too much work bruh

stable rain
warm shaleBOT
stable rain
#

oh

warm shaleBOT
stable rain
#

lol

#

ok but essentially they r sets

#

contour integrals is like

#

integrating over a contour which is represented by a set of vals

#

ok but the prev issue

wild swallow
#

well

#

not exactly

#

theyre curves with an orientation

stable rain
#

with jordans lemma

#

i got that its upper bounded by

#

$\frac{ 2 \pi R (R^2)}{(R-1)(R- \sqrt 2)( R- \sqrt2 )}$

#

but this is not vanishing

warm shaleBOT
stable rain
#

its ~2pi

#

hm

#

i can just work with that right

#

use it as 2pi rather than 0

#

as R-> inf

stable rain
wild swallow
#

didnt check but

#

that seems like you have too many powers of R

#

should be R^2/R^3

#

anyway

wild swallow
#

cauchy's integral formula

stable rain
# warm shale

in num i got R^2 from x^2 and the last R from the contour

wild swallow
#

there is no R from the contour

stable rain
#

wasnt this residue theorem

wild swallow
#

you're using jordan's lemma

stable rain
#

wait isnt ML bound M from contour like

#

2pi R

wild swallow
#

its not ML bound

#

its jordan

#

jordan is stronger than ML bound here

stable rain
#

but we use ml bound right

wild swallow
#

no

#

you use jordan

stable rain
#

to show it vanishes

wild swallow
#

no

#

you cant use ML bound here

#

its not strong enough

wild swallow
stable rain
#

:c

wild swallow
#

cauchy's integral formula

#

omega boosted x9001

#

oh wait

#

hold on

#

i think i quoted it wrong lol

stable rain
#

this?

#

hais wait

#

how do i jordans lemma here

warm shaleBOT
wild swallow
#

apply the statement of the theorem

warm shaleBOT
stable rain
#

this is like when we use residue theorem with a pole of order 2 right

wild swallow
#

its cauchy's integral formula

wild swallow
#

residue theorem is proved using cauchy's integral formula

stable rain
#

hm

#

ok the other 1

#

with jordans lemma we got

#

$(1 - e^{- \pi R}) \max_{z \in S_R} |g(z)|$

warm shaleBOT
stable rain
#

so as R-> inf, e^-piR vanishes

#

so we get O(R^-1)

wild swallow
#

there should be a pi prefactor but it doesnt really matter

#

g vanishes

#

so you're done

stable rain
#

alpha = pi

wild swallow
#

oh alpha = pi

#

ok

stable rain
#

ok imma

#

come back after thinking about the other Q

#

imma

#

BREAK rn

#

or some would even say

#

Breakthrough

#

lmao

wild swallow
stable rain
#

Level up Imperial Sky Layer 1

#

thanks

#

❄️

warm shaleBOT
wild swallow
#

❄️

stable rain
#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @stable rain

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

drowsy grail
#

You're still trying to solve this simple problem? You're dumb

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

humble dock
#

Idk how to solve this?

obtuse pebbleBOT
cedar lichen
#

What have you tried

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@humble dock Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

versed drum
#

Can someone please help me with this problem here?

versed drum
#

<@&286206848099549185>

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@versed drum Has your question been resolved?

marble junco
#

try to decompose each term

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@versed drum Has your question been resolved?

versed drum
#

Can you please elaborate?

#

Send a solution perhaps?

marble junco
#

for example, try to make 1/(sqrt(0.2) + sqrt(0.4)) something like a/sqrt(0.2) - b/sqrt(0.4)

#

you need to obtain a and b values

versed drum
#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @versed drum

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

nocturne karma
#

Hello I have a question over a trig substitution problem

nocturne karma
#

The problem is the integral of 9x^3 / sqrt of (1+x^2) dx

#

That would be an improper fraction right?

#

Pls help

#

Yes that

#

This is what I have so far

#

Not sure what to do now though as I have a 9x^3 up top

warm shaleBOT
#

luckydongdong

marble junco
#

you need integral?

nocturne karma
marble junco
#

try to define $u=x^2$

warm shaleBOT
#

luckydongdong

nocturne karma
#

wdym

#

I have to use trig sub to solve it

marble junco
#

oh ok

#

sorry

nocturne karma
#

Do you know how?

marble junco
#

your figure looks correct

#

change every x to $\theta$

warm shaleBOT
#

luckydongdong

marble junco
#

including dx

spice citrus
#

Try to just sub it in

#

I think you'll get sin x * tan^2(x)

nocturne karma
#

ok

#

So the top would be tan^3(x)?

spice citrus
#

Then use a trig identity for the tan^2

#

And bottom?

nocturne karma
#

Top would be tan^3x(sec^2x)

#

And bottom sec (theta)

#

So it cancels

#

And now it’s tan^3theta (sec(theta)

spice citrus
#

Yes, I was wrong

nocturne karma
#

So I can write tangent as sin/cos and sec as 1/cos

#

So now I have sin^3(theta)/cos^3(theta)*1/cos(theta)

spice citrus
#

Try a substitution again

nocturne karma
#

Wdym

spice citrus
#

Rewriting tangent and secant isn't necessary

nocturne karma
#

It’s also a IBP problem now

spice citrus
#

No, u = tan x works out I think

nocturne karma
#

oh ok

#

So u^3(sec(theta))?

#

Now I could do IBP?

spice citrus
#

du = sec^2(x)dx right?

nocturne karma
#

Let me try

nocturne karma
spice citrus
#

Wouldn't the integrand be u^3du?

nocturne karma
#

Wait what

spice citrus
#

Oh, nvm thought it was tan^3 * sec^2

nocturne karma
#

I’m so confused

spice citrus
#

Okay, we have integral of tan^3 * sec right?

nocturne karma
#

yes

#

Thetas

spice citrus
#

Yes

#

u = sec theta

#

This should work if you write tan^2 as sec^2 - 1

nocturne karma
#

What

spice citrus
#

du = sec(theta) * tan(theta) dtheta

nocturne karma
#

Can you write it on paper so I can see it?

#

Easier than writing thetas

#

Or on online notes

spice citrus
#

Maybe online

nocturne karma
#

ok

spice citrus
#

Hopefully this is correct, I have to go now

nocturne karma
#

I meant like an online sketch pad lol

spice citrus
#

I'm on mobile lol

nocturne karma
#

Oh

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@nocturne karma Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

frail karma
#

Hello guys i need help with this question

obtuse pebbleBOT
frail karma
#

Null hypothesis is people cant tell the difference between butter and margarine

#

expected number is 100

#

I dont know about 2b tho

plain stag
#

an alternate form of the null hypothesis is that the proportion of people that can correctly identify butter is 0.5

frail karma
#

5%is 10 people

#

Idk now

plain stag
#

true but not relevant

#

you want to test what is the probability of getting 120 people (or more) out of a sample of 200, given that the proportion is 0.5

#

that's where the 5% significance comes into play

frail karma
#

hmm

#

I am trying to think about it

#

80 people

#

Can not differentiate

#

Welp i am still confused

frail karma
plain stag
#

What doesn't make sense

frail karma
#

I am not sure how to think about it still

plain stag
#

The null hypothesis is that the proportion of ppl who can correctly identify butter is 50%

frail karma
#

Yeah i know that

plain stag
#

Under the assumption that the null hypothesis is true, your goal is to compute the probability of obtaining a sample where at least 120 out of 200 people correctly identify butter

frail karma
#

I just dont know 2b

plain stag
#

To reject the null hypothesis at 5% significance is to do the above computation and get a probability of less than 5%

plain stag
#

You have a sample of 200, and a constant proportion of success of 0.5

#

What distribution sounds appropriate?

frail karma
#

Binomial

plain stag
#

Indeed

frail karma
#

0.003

#

That is less that 0.05

#

So

#

We accept the null?

plain stag
#

You don't want =, you want >=

frail karma
#

Hmm

plain stag
#

I suggest you do a little more reading on hypothesis tests, you want to compute the probability of getting a result at least as extreme

frail karma
plain stag
#

With n=200, every point will have tiny probability

plain stag
#

Good

#

So if we assume the null hypothesis is true, the probability of getting 120 or more people is 0.3%

#

So do you think the null is true?

frail karma
#

P(X>=120) is 0.00284

plain stag
#

=

#

Unless your screenshots are saying different things

frail karma
#

Its the same

plain stag
#

P(X = 120) = 0.001 according to your first screenshot

frail karma
#

Ye

#

I edited

frail karma
#

Which is not = to 0.5

#

So we reject?

plain stag
#

What is 0.5

frail karma
#

50% can identify correctly

plain stag
#

You're getting your percentages mixed up

#

,calc 120/200

warm shaleBOT
#

Result:

0.6
plain stag
#

The proportion who got it right is 0.6, which is greater than 0.5

#

However the probability of getting a sample proportion of at least 0.6 given that the null proportion is 0.5 comes out to about 0.003

frail karma
#

oHH

#

At 0.05 significance level we cant reject

#

We are comparing 0.003 to 0.05

plain stag
#

Yes

#

If the probability of getting a sample at least as extreme as what we got is less than 5%, we reject

frail karma
#

Yeah its so small

#

Compared to 5%

plain stag
#

So what does that tell you about the null?

frail karma
plain stag
#

Not just 'can'

frail karma
#

We reject our null hypothesis

#

Wording matters

plain stag
#

Indeed we do

frail karma
#

Thank you for helping me

#

<33333

plain stag
#

No worries, good luck moving forward

frail karma
plain stag
#

What does that mean

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@frail karma Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

smoky zenith
#

If cos and sec has the inverse restriction of -pi over 2 to pi over 2 and SIn and cos sec has the inverse restriction of pi to 0 whats the inverse restriction of tan and cot?

daring rock
#

To be clear, you're referring to the range of the inverse functions, not the domain, right?

#

And you have them backwards

#

arcsin ranges from -pi/2 to pi/2
arccos ranges from 0 to pi

#

And arctan ranges from -pi/2 to pi/2

smoky zenith
#

oh ya my bad

daring rock
#

Oh, and arccot ranges from 0 to pi apparently

#

That makes sense, it avoids having a horizontal asymptote in the middle

#

But I've literally never used the inverse of cot, sec, or csc. There's no reason you'd ever need to

smoky zenith
#

k ty

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@smoky zenith Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

fringe ingot
obtuse pebbleBOT
fringe ingot
#

What is this equation for partial fraction decomposition called

haughty coyote
#

Just looks like the regular PFD in C, with arguably debatable notations with A_l^(j)

fringe ingot
haughty coyote
#

The irreducibles are different

#

x^2 + 1 is irreducible in R, not in C

fringe ingot
#

Is that all?

#

My proff said he wants it written with limits and everything tho

haughty coyote
#

There's different methods to find the coefficients in practice, but for the general theorem ? You don't have a given way of just giving a nice formula for every coefficient

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@fringe ingot Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

covert girder
obtuse pebbleBOT
covert girder
#

Help

rigid lintel
#

solve 6x - 12 = 18

covert girder
#

Oh

#

That's easier than I thought thanks

rigid lintel
#

yeah math be like that sometimes haha

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@covert girder Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @covert girder

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

stone raptor
#

brain isnt working help me

obtuse pebbleBOT
stone raptor
knotty crow
#

what is the part a

stone raptor
#

a) 1/(10+x)^2 = series ( n/100 (-x/10)^(n-1) )

#

and i used that series i set it up in second line of part b

#

i dont know how to take derivative of series

knotty crow
#

maybe use the fact that

#

$$\frac{\text{d}^2}{\text{d}x^2}\Big( \frac{\frac{1}{2}}{10+x}\Big)=\frac{1}{(10+x)^3}$$

warm shaleBOT
knotty crow
#

series of (1/2)/(10+x) is easier

stone raptor
#

ye thats what i had

#

its literally the same thing as what i wrote for part b second line

#

but i dont know how to take derivative of n/100 (-x/10)^(n+1)

#

oh sh i think i know the problem

knotty crow
#

aa, you've found the series of 1/2 / (10+x) in a

#

or?

#

$$

stone raptor
#

ye i found it in a

knotty crow
#

but it's wrong then

#

how 'n' there

stone raptor
#

nvm i got it

#

my brain is broken today

knotty crow
#

ah ok it's 1/(10+x^2)

#

np.

#

I was thinking about (1/2) / (10+x) 😄

#

good job

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@stone raptor Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @stone raptor

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

cinder quest
#

Hi

obtuse pebbleBOT
velvet peak
#

Can someone explain why this is wrong?

cinder quest
#

hey

#

my channel :p

#

can someone help me with this

velvet peak
#

Well 4.5 percent of interest per annum gained $83.75 with $460 extra in the initial investment so the question would be what amount of money would get you 83$ on 4.5percent interest

warm shaleBOT
#

sarahsokool
Compile Error! Click the errors reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)

velvet peak
#

And deduct the 460 at the end

cinder quest
#

oooh ok ok

#

how do i write this down

unkempt galleon
#

isnt the 83.75 from both the 1.5% and 4.5%

#

or am i reading the question wrong

cinder quest
#

hi @unkempt galleon

unkempt galleon
#

hi

fast cliff
cinder quest
#

how

fast cliff
#

i think you would use the money in each for varaibles

#

x can be lower

#

x + 460 = y

velvet peak
#

You don’t have to worry about the 1.5 percent

#

It’s a different savings account

cinder quest
#

ok ok

fast cliff
#

(1.015)x + (1.045)y = 83.75

cinder quest
fast cliff
#

i think thats the system

#

x + 460 = y

#

(0.015)x + (0.045)y = 83.75

#

wait

#

there lol

cinder quest
#

ok ok

#

what do i do now

fast cliff
#

do you know how to solve a system

cinder quest
#

No

fast cliff
#

rip

cinder quest
#

I mean

fast cliff
#

so you already have y in terms of x

cinder quest
#

okay

fast cliff
#

you can substiute y = 460 + x into the second equation

cinder quest
#

how does that look

fast cliff
#

(0.015)x + (0.045)(x+460) = 83.75

unkempt galleon
#

substitue the 0.045y into 0.045(460+x)

fast cliff
cinder quest
#

i multiply

#

0.0045 with x+460 ?

fast cliff
#

you should multiply everything by 1000 first to make the numbers easier

unkempt galleon
#

other way around

#

yea

fast cliff
#

15x + 45(x+460) = 83750

#

no more decimals

cinder quest
#

ok ok

unkempt galleon
#

then distribute the 45 over the x and the 460

fast cliff
fast cliff
unkempt galleon
#

its how my brain works

#

i realized after i sent

cinder quest
#

@fast cliff

fast cliff
#

lol

#

yea

fast cliff
#

ignore he messed up what he meant

cinder quest
#

I have 15x+45(x+460)=83750 RN

fast cliff
#

yea

#

multiple x by 45 and 460 by 45

unkempt galleon
#

mhm

cinder quest
#

!calc

fast cliff
#

15x + 45(x) + 45(460)

cinder quest
#

460x45

fast cliff
#

!calc 460x45

#

lol rip

fast cliff
cinder quest
#

ok ok

fast cliff
#

can you

#

simplifiy a little

cinder quest
#

do i do

fast cliff
#

15x + 45x + 20700 = 83750

cinder quest
#

60x+20700=83750

fast cliff
#

yea

#

you should be able to solve for x

#

i believe in you lmao

cinder quest
#

I minus 20700 correct

#

and put it on 83

fast cliff
fast cliff
unkempt galleon
#

from both sides

cinder quest
#

83750

fast cliff
#

yea subtract 20700 from that

cinder quest
#

I got

#

x=1050.833

fast cliff
#

yea good

cinder quest
#

So A

fast cliff
#

nope

cinder quest
#

WHAT

#

):

fast cliff
#

think about the variables we used

cinder quest
#

X

#

ok i see what to do i think

fast cliff
cinder quest
#

variable X

fast cliff
#

yea no

fast cliff
cinder quest
#

do i multiply .015 with 1050

fast cliff
#

if x had a