#help-10

1 messages · Page 28 of 1

inland pine
#

well that proves it right

royal basin
#

no

#

for the inductive step you do not put n as any value

inland pine
#

ah ok i got it now

#

thanks

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @inland pine

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

timid silo
obtuse pebbleBOT
timid silo
#

can anyone help me with this?

#

so far i've got

  1. [p && ] - Assumption
  2. p - & Elimination (1)
  3. q - & Elimination (1)
weary delta
#

What rules do you have in the book?

timid silo
#

@weary deltaany idea?

weary delta
#

Sorry, I’m not familiar with this sort of logic

#

Maybe modus tollens to get a double negation?

#

Assume p \land q. By modus ponens this statement is nothing but not(p \implies not(q)). By initial assumption + and elimination p. Thus by modus ponens the statement is not(not(q)), by double not elimination we reach q. By initial assumption + and elimination q. Thus 1?

stable rain
#

woah woah

#

u cant just do double elimination like that

weary delta
#

I guess you’d also need to show Assume not(p \land q). No idea. Was just guessing since noone else seems to be responding 😄

timid silo
#

these proofs will be the end of me

#

@stable rainAre yuo familiar with these?

stable rain
#

a bit

#

but

#

like i said

#

double elimination is sus

timid silo
#

would it be possible if we could hop in a call and i could share my screen and you could give me a little guidance?

#

i'm really struggling with these

stable rain
#

u cant really prove

#

p from ~~p

timid silo
#

well assumptions are allowed if you didnt already know

stable rain
#

@timid silo

#

i kinda forgot how u would go about working

#

can u show how u would show

#

p or ~p is a tautology

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@timid silo Has your question been resolved?

timid silo
#

@stable rain

#

here's an example proof my prof did

stable rain
#

yea i get that

#

but in this case the assumptions is nothing right

#

so how do we start

#

(p and q) -> ~(p -> ~q), start, 1
(p -> ~(p -> ~q)) or (q -> ~(p -> ~q)), from start, 2

#

can we do this

timid silo
#

well i think we need to start with just

#

p and q

#

and work towards p and q -> ~(p->~q)

#

im so confused bro

stable rain
#

can we start with p and q?

#

if we start with p and q then we are taking p and q as our premises right

timid silo
#

yes

#

we need to eventually workout way from:
p and q
.
.
.
(p and q) -> ~(p->~q)

stable rain
#

oh

#

yea i get it now

#

so u are saying instead we can equivalently prove

#

p, q |= ~(p->~q)

#

yea?

timid silo
#

kinda yeah

#

idk if that's 100% accurate to say it like that

#

but we start with the left hand side and assume that

#

and then work our way down

stable rain
#

yea

#

i feel its equivalent

#

but idk if we can start with that

#

do uve an example of a tautology being proved

timid silo
#

lemme c

stable rain
#

other than a when a is true or tautology itself

timid silo
stable rain
#

ok i guess they are saying

#

when trying to prove

#

a->b

#

we can assume b?

#

idk a bit confused

#

idk looks weird

#

they assumed p then later assumed not p

timid silo
#

so the idea is

#

you can assume anything

#

thats what the brackets denote

stable rain
#

and

#

whats that conditional on

#

im pretty sure u had to resolve what u assumed somewhere right

#

else u can just assume the tautology is true

timid silo
#

so for example here

#

everytime u assume something

#

you indent one inwards

#

and it changes the scope of the variables you can use

#

by the end of the proof you need to be back to the leftest indent

#

but you can assume things to help you introduce stuff you didnt have before

stable rain
#

ok so

#

back to

#

p or ~p

timid silo
#

i'll just go to my professors office hours and try to get extra help

stable rain
#

lol

#

yea

#

i think im understanding a bit more now

#

lol

#

so the table u showed earlier

#

if weve a->b

#

we can assume anything

#

like we can assume c

timid silo
stable rain
#

but later on we have to add in a

#

c->(whatever we got)

#

is that right

#

so for

#

p or ~p

#

we can assume p

#

from there we get ~p

#

going back assumption we get

#

p-> ~p

timid silo
#

well

#

you have to "leave an assumption world"

#

like you have to leave that assumption's scope

#

that's done through something like

#

-> introduction

#

or Reduction to absurdity

#

so if you see these two rules

#

they assumed [a]

#

and they have variable b

#

through -> intro they can leave that assumption world and say that a->b

stable rain
#

oh yea i get it now

#

ok i get how to do

#

wait

#

its still feels weird

#

p or ~p

timid silo
#

well p or ~p is just = to p

stable rain
#

[p]

#

[~p]

#

p and ~p is false, resolving ~p, we get p

timid silo
#

hm

#

circle would you be willing to call and discuss this i think that might be easier

stable rain
#

sure

#

wait actually nvm

#

my mic is bad

timid silo
#

that's fine tbh

#

i can deal with that

#

i just wanna understand this stuff 😭

stable rain
#

o ok

timid silo
#

sent u a friend req

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@timid silo Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

past rivet
#

hi I need help with proving that cos(α −β) = cos(α) cos(β) + sin(α) sin(β) when α = 2π, α = β and β = 0 (not at the same time, but substitued in one at a time they should keep the equality of the equation)

kind hawk
#

well what can you use?

#

do you know complex exp?

past rivet
#

complex exp?

kind hawk
#

exp(z) for complex z

#

although I guess that's overkill if you only have to show it's satisfied for those few values

past rivet
#

yea

kind hawk
#

cos(2pi), cos(0) etc are special values

#

what are they

past rivet
#

cos(2pi)=1 (cos0)=1 no?

kind hawk
#

good and what about sin of these values?

past rivet
#

sin(2pi)=0 at least

#

sin(0)=1?

kind hawk
#

no

past rivet
#

0

#

it equals 0

kind hawk
#

yes

#

so when yyou plug these values in, which equalities do you actually have to show

past rivet
#

ill try to do it one moment

#

i just dont know what to do with cos(α −β)

#

isn't it cos(1-beta)?

kind hawk
#

only if alpha=1

past rivet
#

alpha is 2pi for the first value

#

which is 1

kind hawk
#

2pi is not 1

past rivet
#

cos(2pi)?

kind hawk
#

well that's different

past rivet
#

true

#

i just end up with cos(2pi-beta)=cos(beta)

#

which is not the same

#

i don't know where im doing something wrong

kind hawk
#

it is

#

which properties of cos do you know

past rivet
#

uhh the ones we discussed above at least

#

how is (2pi-beta)=cos(beta)?

kind hawk
#

do you know that cos is 2pi periodic?

past rivet
#

I don't know what that means sorry

kind hawk
#

it repeats after 2pi steps

#

cos(x)=cos(x+2pi)

past rivet
#

oh right, yea that i understand

kind hawk
#

ok

#

so cos(2pi-beta)=cos(-beta), yes?

past rivet
#

I suppose

kind hawk
#

so now we need to show that cos(-beta)=cos(beta)

#

do you know that already?

past rivet
#

but what about the 2pi part, it's still 1 or..?

#

which gives cos(1-beta) or am i wrong here?

kind hawk
#

which 2pi part

#

you can't evaluate functions like this

past rivet
#

oh

#

I mean yeah cos(-beta)=cos(beta) cause it's the same axis

kind hawk
#

good. so we are done with the first one

past rivet
#

but I still don't understand what happens to cos(alpha-beta)?

kind hawk
#

well in general cos(alpha-beta)=cos(alpha)cos(beta)+sin(alpha)sin(beta)

#

which we are here proving for a few special cases

past rivet
#

ahh so then it would be the same as 1*cos(-beta)?

kind hawk
#

that's what we are showing

past rivet
#

yeah I mean, that makes sense

#

wait give me a moment to try to solve for 2pi

#

alright I got it

#

nice

#

so you end up with cos(-beta)=cos(beta) which is the same

#

@kind hawk

kind hawk
#

yes

past rivet
#

nicee

#

ok so i'll try for alpha=beta

#

ok so i get it down to cos(beta)cos(-beta)=cos(beta)sin(beta)+sin(beta)

kind hawk
#

no

#

not sure how you got that

past rivet
#

ill try again

#

with just replacing alpha for beta

#

ok so it gives us:

cos(beta-beta)=cos(beta)cos(beta)+sin(beta)sin(beta)

kind hawk
#

yes

#

on the LHS beta-beta=0

#

so we are just left with ?

past rivet
#

0=0

kind hawk
#

no

#

cos(beta-beta)= ?

past rivet
#

cos(0)?

kind hawk
#

yes

#

which is?

past rivet
#

its.. 1?

kind hawk
#

yes

past rivet
#

ah

#

😄

kind hawk
#

so LHS is 1

#

lets do the RHS

past rivet
#

okay

kind hawk
#

we notice that the inputs are teh same

#

so it's cos^2(beta)+sin^2(beta)

#

do you know this expression

past rivet
#

looks like the pythagorean theorem

kind hawk
#

it is

past rivet
#

so can you just take the squareroot then?

kind hawk
#

square root of what

#

what does pythagoras say

past rivet
#

side^2+side^2=hyp^2

#

sorry we don't use it in english 😄

kind hawk
#

good and to which triangle can we apply that here?

past rivet
#

uhmm

#

i dont know tbh

kind hawk
#

do you know the unit circle?

past rivet
#

yea

kind hawk
#

so where in the unit circle could we find all these values? which triangle?

past rivet
#

cos^2(beta)+sin^2(beta)?

kind hawk
#

of which triangle are cos(beta) and sin(beta) the sidelengths

past rivet
#

1st quadrant?

#

and then you would have a right triangle there i guess

#

where the hypothenus has a radius of 1

kind hawk
#

where the hypothenus has length 1, yes

#

so what does pythagoras tell us about that triangle then?

past rivet
#

cos^2(beta)+sin^2(beta)=1^2

kind hawk
#

yes

#

and how does that help us?

past rivet
#

its explains why both sides must be equal

#

no wait

#

yeah just cos^2(beta)+sin^2(beta)=1^2

kind hawk
#

yes

#

so we are also done with this case now

past rivet
#

amazing

#

so if beta=0

#

I simplified it down to cos(alpha-0)=cos(alpha)*1

#

not completely sure what to do with the lefthand side

#

ohh no nvm I think I know

#

cos(alpha-0)=cos(alpha)cos(0)=cos(alpha)*1 correct?

kind hawk
#

yes

past rivet
#

alright so that are all the calculations which shows that all the different values still keeps the equation equal

kind hawk
#

yes

past rivet
#

thank you very much!! I really appreciate the time and effort you took to help me with this ❤️

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@past rivet Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @past rivet

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

foggy jewel
#

Hello

obtuse pebbleBOT
foggy jewel
#

Can you figure out the sequence/progression of the white circles?

flint sundial
past rivet
#

ahh right that makes sense

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@foggy jewel Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@foggy jewel Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

hybrid turtle
#

let a , b , c and d be natural numbers such that :1<a<b<c<d show that 1/a+1/b+1/c+1/d+1/abcd ≤31/24

hybrid turtle
#

Any help guys ??🙏

haughty coyote
#

You can actually maximize this quite easily

#

Just find the 4 numbers that give the highest value

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@hybrid turtle Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@hybrid turtle Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

timid silo
obtuse pebbleBOT
timid silo
#

The amount of chemical in the i-th shell is not approximately k/(1+r_i^2) since the radius can vary does it not?

#

ahh it was a very shallow pool

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @sleek solstice

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

timid silo
#

Can someone please help me?

I had to prove

-(a+b) =(-a)+(-b)

The solution given started with
(-1)(a+b) and then used left distributive property.

I don't understand how they turned -(a+b) into (-1) (a+b)
Can we do it simply? I'm confused because we only have to use field properties
Can I say that's multiplicative identity?

warm shaleBOT
#

illuminator3

timid silo
#

I don't think we can do it randomly
Because for another question
(-1)a =-a they asked for a proof

timid silo
restive ridge
#

no but if you already proved it in a previous exercise then you can just refer to that proof

timid silo
#

Ah okay makes sense. Thanks a lot!

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @verbal sky

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

pale stag
#

hey im looking for some help on a trig substituion problem, im working on the problem, ∫1/(x√ (x^2+25)

pale stag
#

so i started off by setting x = 5tan(θ)

#

so dx = 5sec^2(θ)dθ

#

and then i set √(x^2 + 25) = 25secθ

#

then i substitute in to get (1/25)∫(secθ/tanθ)dθ

#

and no matter where i go from here my solution is not getting accepted

#

can anyone show me if im doing something wrong in this setup?

cedar lichen
#

√(x² + 25) is not 25 sec θ

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@pale stag Has your question been resolved?

pale stag
#

could you elaborate as to how?

cedar lichen
#

First, elaborate how it is

pale stag
#

because i set up (x^2+25) =√( (5tanθ)^2+25)

#

and then i get √(25tan^2θ +25)

#

and i pull out a 25

cedar lichen
#

√(ab) ≠ a √b

#

Otherwise we could take any square root easily by saying √x = x √1 = x

pale stag
#

oh i see

#

so that should leave 5secθ?

cedar lichen
#

Yes

pale stag
#

oh ok thanks for showing me that

#

so just after that i set it up using that and the dθ correct?

cedar lichen
#

Yep

pale stag
#

∫(5sec^2θ)/(5tanθ5secθ)dθ ?

#

is that set up right?

cedar lichen
#

Looks like it

pale stag
#

ok so then i get 1/5∫cscθdθ

#

giving me (-1/5)ln(abs(cscθ + cotθ)) + c

#

and then using x = 5tanθ

#

i set up a right triangle to find cscθ = √(x^2 +25)/x

#

and cotθ = 5/x

#

since it was beginning to get difficult to type these all out

#

however that answer is still not being accepted

#

i suppose i could simplify a bit further

#

but it still won't take that even

#

-ln(abs((x^2+25)^(1/2)/x))/5 +c

#

i just can't figure out what im getting wrong

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@pale stag Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

grizzled bay
#

Assume that you have a committee of 14 members, made up of 7 men and 7 women.

In how many ways can the 3 tasks be assigned so that both men and women are given assignments?

true rain
#

which 3 tasks

grizzled bay
#

its imaginary

true rain
#

wow!

#

I dont think I understand what this question is asking

#

men and women for each task? any task? all 14 must be assigned? any 14?

drifting wraith
#

agreed

grizzled bay
#

Ok

drifting wraith
#

oh it's like

#

3 people are chosen

#

except you can;t choose 3 men or 3 women

#

that's the solution too

true rain
#

3 people are chosen for what

drifting wraith
#

to each get one task

true rain
#

every task?

blissful bane
#

I think it's asking, how many ways we can arrange 3 from 14 remember

#

given, 2 must be men and women

true rain
#

Hmmm if every man and woman must be unique

#

I think you should consider removing the number of unique selections that choose only men or only women

#

or answer, choose 2 men and 1 woman, and choose 2 women and 1 man

#

Do you know the equation for that?

blissful bane
#

from 14 (7M+7W) people, select 3 ( 2 Men and 1 Women)

#

i guess so

#

is it 7C2 * 7 C1 ?

true rain
#

yeah that would be for 2m and 1w

blissful bane
#

so 7C2 * 7 C1 + 7C1 * 7 C2 ?

true rain
#

looks right to me

blissful bane
#

I guess so, not sure

true rain
#

I was also thinking 14c3 - 2* 7c3

#

if they're the same then I'm confident

blissful bane
#

I'll verify that

blissful bane
#

that is just for 2m and 1 w?

true rain
#

should be either or

#

2men 1 woman or 2 women 1 man

blissful bane
#

right

blissful bane
blissful bane
#

noice, it's same for both of us

#

@true rain

true rain
#

thumbs up emoji

#

i need to leave now

blissful bane
#

have a good one

#

@grizzled bay

grizzled bay
#

What is it?

#

Oh

#

I tried 294 and I think it sisd it was wrong

#

Becuase I also looked it up online and that’s what it said

blissful bane
#

@grizzled bay i mean, that could possibly be the answer

grizzled bay
#

Let me try it again

blissful bane
#

we both did in different ways

grizzled bay
#

294 didn’t work

blissful bane
#

${n \choose r}$

grizzled bay
#

Was there another one?

blissful bane
#

screenshot the question

#

and post here

grizzled bay
blissful bane
#

@grizzled bay

grizzled bay
#

Yes

blissful bane
#

I think, i understand what the mean

grizzled bay
#

14 people

#

3 tasks

#

7 of each gender

blissful bane
#

Total ways to arrange will be $14 * 13 * 12$

grizzled bay
#

What

warm shaleBOT
#

CapitalW

blissful bane
#

nice

#

see, here first any of that 14 can go into task 1

#

then 13 can be only chosen for task 2

#

then 12 of them can go to final task

#

so by multiplication theorem 14 * 13 * 12= 2184 ways

#

what we need to find is both men and women choosing for tasks

#

If only males can fill the tasks= 7* 6 *5=210

#

If only females can fill the tasks = 7* 6 *5 =210

grizzled bay
#

Still says incorrect

blissful bane
#

so both male and female = 2184-504-504=1176 Ways

#

try this

grizzled bay
#

Still no

blissful bane
#

i made a lil mistake

#

try 2184-210-210=1764 ways

#

@grizzled bay

grizzled bay
#

Correct

blissful bane
#

great

grizzled bay
#

Thanks for all your help

blissful bane
#

wait what?

#

don't you want to know?

grizzled bay
#

I was going to read up

#

I figured your thought process was above

#

If not, I’m all ears

#

I guess I shouldn’t have assumed

blissful bane
#

if you understood my thought process through text

#

it will be great and good to go

grizzled bay
#

So from what I see

#

The three tasks have to be delegated individually so to speak

#

Then the overall number of people goes down

#

To 13

#

And then 12

blissful bane
#

ie, if you select from the entire 14 without filtering

#

if I subtract arrangements of only female and only men from the total arrangements , I'll get both men and female

#

pretty intuitive

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@grizzled bay Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

sonic turtle
#

im doing a practice sat questions for math and how would i solve this very quickly

sonic turtle
fierce lagoon
#

I mean this kinda requires you knowing what that function looks like

#

If you think about it

#

@sonic turtle is x > x-1 (for all x > 0)?

#

Bruh

#

@sonic turtle yo you there?

sonic turtle
#

yo one sec

fierce lagoon
obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@sonic turtle Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

fierce lagoon
#

L

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

sleek ocean
obtuse pebbleBOT
#

Please don't occupy multiple help channels.

sleek ocean
#

need help solving the meters part :)

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@sleek ocean Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@sleek ocean Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

timid silo
#

i dont understand anything desmos is confusing and this as well

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@delicate karma Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

timid silo
#

how will you solve this one

obtuse pebbleBOT
timid silo
#

y can’t you multiply and divide and then get the answer

pine sail
#

$\f13 \times 3 \times 3^5 = 3^n$

warm shaleBOT
#

What the hell am I doing here?

pine sail
#

Yeah?

timid silo
#

this one

pine sail
#

Simply multiply, yes that is what you have to do.

#

Or use Exponent laws to write each side as an exponent of 3.

timid silo
#

but there comes a rule in your mind that if same bases are being multiplied you add the powers

pine sail
#

Yeah then do that...

timid silo
#

but here that isn’t making sense

pine sail
#

It is.

#

It clearly is.

pine sail
timid silo
#

can you make 3/3 * 3 ^ 5 = 3 ^ n

timid silo
pine sail
#

Yes.

#

You've learnt correctly.

pine sail
timid silo
#

this one

pine sail
#

You can do it so many ways, which are all the same, just a different way to look at it.
If you want to use the rule that states you can add exponents when the base is same. Then note 1/3 is just 3^(-1) and 3 is just 3^1 so you have 3^(1-1+5).
Another way is to first simplify 3/3 which is just 1 so you have 1 * 3^5. Whatever you do, you end up with a 3^5 in the LHS.

timid silo
#

if you just cancel three and three but there is a multiplication sign in the middle

wild swallow
#

3/3 = ?

#

theres no more multiplication

#

if you just cancel the 3s in 3/3

timid silo
#

so you get like 3^5 = 3^n

wild swallow
#

yes

timid silo
#

and now you cancel both bases

#

and so you get 5 = n

#

five should be the answer

#

could have done 9/3 but division was first so had to cancel

timid silo
pine sail
#

And it's correct still.

#

5 is your answer.

timid silo
#

it says 9 is the answer

#

how will nine be

pine sail
#

I think this is where you share an image of the original question.

timid silo
#

right ill add the question

#

this one

pine sail
timid silo
#

yes this one

#

the answer comes as nine

pine sail
#

The answer isn't 9, but a 5. If you are convinced 9 is the correct answer, then you should share an image of the original question from the source you're doing this. That is a book, or whatever.

timid silo
#

my bad

#

it’s not 1/3, it’s 3/3

pine sail
#

It's not even 3/3, I don't even see a /

#

It's poorly written.

timid silo
#

it should have that division line

#

but because of some sort of misprint it has got removed

warm shaleBOT
#

What the hell am I doing here?

timid silo
#

it’s like 3^3/3

pine sail
#

I think, this is what they want you to solve.

#

The thing I've written.

timid silo
pine sail
#

Yes, try solving that one.

timid silo
#

right

#

3^3 + 1 + 5 = 3^n

pine sail
#

Use parentheses

timid silo
#

3^9 = 3^n

pine sail
#

Yes.

#

And that gives you the desired answer.

timid silo
#

the bases gets canceled and nine is the answer.

#

is indices the topic whole based on practice?

#

because everytime you come across some new questions

pine sail
timid silo
#

right

#

thanks

#

for the help

#

.close the channel

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @buoyant zephyr

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

mighty ether
#

do i need to use squeeze theorem for this problem?

mighty ether
#

i think i might be overcomplicating it?

#

i feel like there is something here to trip me up... I was planning on just calculating the double integral

#

and taking it from there but idk if that would be enough

wild swallow
#

maximise the numerator

#

minimise the denominator

#

that puts an upper bound on the integral

mighty ether
#

oh okay, and thats it? because i don't have a lower bound

#

so i wouldn't need to worry about that right/

#

?

stable rain
#

hii

mighty ether
#

hi

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @mighty ether

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

mighty ether
#

what am i doing wrong here? the answer looks different from the calculator?

stable rain
#

finally lol

#

why wouold u

#

close and ask a question

#

lol

mighty ether
#

cause i didn't think the helper had anything more to say?

#

sorry, is it against the rules?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

warm plover
#

I dont understand where to start

#

I tried different things but it doesnt work

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to the original message being deleted

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

stable rain
#

ive a question

obtuse pebbleBOT
stable rain
#

say weve f(x) = 1+O(x)
can we or how do we show
f(x) = (f(x))^-1

#

i know we can show it for f(x) = (f(x))^n, where n is N>0

#

but idk how to show it for negative

#

wait it was x->0

#

does it hold otherwise

#

doesnt seem like it? idk

wild swallow
#

wtf

stable rain
#

$$[1+O((z-n)^2)]^{-1}=1+O((z-n)^2)$$

warm shaleBOT
stable rain
#

OH WAIT

wild swallow
#

binomial

stable rain
#

in this case its

#

x->0

#

oops

#

ok then what about binimial

#

bino

wild swallow
#

binomial theorem

stable rain
#

nvm but

#

first

#

the cond must be

#

x->0 right

wild swallow
#

yeah

stable rain
#

i thought

#

binomial was for

#

n being natural

wild swallow
#

might work if not can't remember

stable rain
#

0

wild swallow
#

extended binomial theorem

#

the one with the negative binomials

stable rain
#

like this? idk

wild swallow
#

pochhammer symbols

stable rain
#

confused

wild swallow
#

gamma functions

stable rain
#

i have

#

never heard of those

#

well i heard of gamma but nvr touched it

wild swallow
#

anyway i'll be back later

stable rain
#

ok got it

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @stable rain

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

stable rain
#

ty

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

timid silo
#

Hello 👋

obtuse pebbleBOT
timid silo
#

I Neeed help with the following question

#

<@&286206848099549185>

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@timid silo Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@timid silo Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@timid silo Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

toxic crescent
#

Hey can someone help me with this

obtuse pebbleBOT
toxic crescent
#

Here's my working out so far

kind hawk
#

do you want to solve for x?

toxic crescent
#

Yes

kind hawk
#

add 48 on both sides of the first equation. what do you get

toxic crescent
#

Wdym both sides

kind hawk
#

left-hand side and right-hand side

toxic crescent
#

Someone said to me there could have been a misprint on the paper

#

Because we were meant to factorise the trinomial but I don't seem to see how

kind hawk
#

why are you expected to multiply this out and then try to factor again

#

if instead of 48 the number was 49 then all the numbers involved would be a bit nicer

#

but it's still possible like this

toxic crescent
#

Yeah

#

I'll retry with 49, if I get stuck I'll come back

trail musk
#

Why would you expand it back out

#

Lol

#

Lets say you had the equation:
u^2 - 48 = 0

#

How would you solve?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@toxic crescent Has your question been resolved?

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

sage hawk
#

please help me find x,y,z

obtuse pebbleBOT
small thicket
#

what r u stuck on

stable rain
#

i dont think u can find y or z

proven zephyr
stable rain
#

oh nvm

proven zephyr
#

wait... i dont think you can

sage hawk
proven zephyr
#

wait.. can you?

stable rain
#

lol

#

idk man

sage hawk
#

i was trying to use substitution but it doesn't work

stable rain
#

idk gl

sage hawk
#

my teacher told me to look at the triangles

#

or interior angles

proven zephyr
stable rain
#

er if u can prove it

#

idk is that a property of parallelogram

#

oh it is

#

wait nvm

#

idk

#

ignore me

proven zephyr
#

i dont think it is

stable rain
#

ye they dont

#

oops

proven zephyr
#

try asking your teacher for the answer

#

im curious too

sage hawk
#

if i solve this i get $5, used to be $10 but then i asked for the hint and it got reduced

small thicket
proven zephyr
snow pewter
proven zephyr
#

no i cant

snow pewter
#

x is easy, is 40°

proven zephyr
#

you can, but i cant

snow pewter
#

then you consider the sum of angles in a triangle

sage hawk
#

180 = z + y' + 40

snow pewter
#

hold o lemme try on paint

sage hawk
#

z + y' = 140

#

if we try substitution

small thicket
#

the two should be equal

#

z and y'

sage hawk
#

y' = 140 - z

#

z + (140 - z) = 140

small thicket
#

bc. diagonals bisect

sage hawk
#

the z's cancel out

wild swallow
#

y and z are not uniquely determined by the diagram

sage hawk
#

z = y because of alternate angles

#

it shouldn't be solvable

snow pewter
#

it should

#

there's only one paralelogram obtainable with x angle

#

therefore there has to be only one solution for z = y

wild swallow
snow pewter
#

why is that?

wild swallow
#

there are infinitely parallelograms obtainable with x=40

snow pewter
#

sorry

#

i should mention

#

that they're all similar

#

infinitely many parallelograms

wild swallow
#

no

snow pewter
#

however all similar

wild swallow
#

that is still wrong

snow pewter
#

how?

#

i have this angle

wild swallow
#

observe

snow pewter
#

okay true

#

so this is not solvable

sage hawk
#

so there's an infinite amount of parallelograms

#

that are similar

snow pewter
#

yeah

sage hawk
#

given that x = 40

#

so the value of y and z are different

snow pewter
#

they're governed by the equation z+w = 140

#

i use w for the unmarked angle

sage hawk
#

in every similar infinite parallelogram

snow pewter
#

not similar

sage hawk
#

no similar okay

wild swallow
#

no y=z that we know

#

the value we do not

snow pewter
#

yeah

sage hawk
#

z + w = 140

#

z = 140 - w

#

substitute

#

140 - w + w = 140

#

yeah with substitution it could not be solvable

obtuse pebbleBOT
#

@sage hawk Has your question been resolved?

stable rain
#

yay

#

fun

stable rain
obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

hoary widget
#

Find out what a+b+c+3p is if a+b+c=p and the pic down below

hoary widget
#

The one it says 1/a...

thick oracle
#

well

stable rain
#

wao

hoary widget
#

Did u understand?

thick oracle
#

do you know what -1 exponent does to a fraction?

hoary widget
#

Idk

thick oracle
#

it flips it

stable rain
#

wao

hoary widget
#

Oh yea

#

But how do I get the answer

#

It's eating my brain

thick oracle
#

well

#

a+b+c=p

hoary widget
#

Yes

thick oracle
#

but you know a+b+c=2

hoary widget
#

Yes

thick oracle
#

so what is p?

hoary widget
#

2?

flint sundial
#

substitute them

thick oracle
flint sundial
hoary widget
#

But how did you know that?

flint sundial
#

a+b+c=2

#

a+b+c=p

#

so i subt

thick oracle
#

from this

#

you flip the fractions

hoary widget
#

How

#

OH

thick oracle
#

1/a flipped is a

hoary widget
#

I understand

#

Let me do this and see what I get

#

The answer is 8?

flint sundial
#

you get 2 + 2 times 3

#

which is 8

hoary widget
#

Yes

#

Thanks for the help

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @hoary widget

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

short warren
#

there's this question :
The line 7x+2y= -20 intersects the curve x²+y² +4x+6y-40 at the points A and B. Find the length of AB.

short warren
#

I tried solving the question by making x in the first equation the subject

#

so x= (-20-2y)/7

#

then i substituted this equation into the second one

devout sable
#

Yes

short warren
#

then idk where to go from there

#

wiat

#

something like this

last falcon
#

thats right

short warren
#

i simplified it further

#

wait

last falcon
#

i would try to open the parentheses

#

since u got rid of x now

short warren
last falcon
#

correct

#

u have a clue for the next step?

short warren
#

then idk what to do

#

how do i get rid of the fraction?

last falcon
#

find common denominator

short warren
#

oh

#

then let me try it

last falcon
#

sure

short warren
short warren
last falcon
#

wouldnt that be a circle with a center?

timid silo
last falcon
#

oh

timid silo
#

that isnt equal anything i mean if thats equal 1 or 2x or anything else then that makes sense

short warren
last falcon
#

i dont see no problem

#

add them up now

#

wait

timid silo
warm shaleBOT
#

does calc even end(cat gang)

timid silo
#

or is this multivariate

last falcon
#

i get your point

#

im not sure about this tho

#

can u assume its =0?

timid silo
#

i think its meant to be something like $f(x,y)=x^2+y^2+4x+6y-40$ not sure tho

warm shaleBOT
#

does calc even end(cat gang)

short warren
#

also i used a graph thingy

#

for the "curve"

#

how is that a curve

timid silo
#

in the graph

#

which u didnt wrote in the question

#

ig the graphing calculator or whatever just assumes it

last falcon
#

hiba check ur book do u have a =0 or is it just like u wrote it?

short warren
#

its =0

last falcon
#

Oh

last falcon
short warren
#

let me send a pic of the question form the book

last falcon
#

how did u get 49y

short warren
short warren
last falcon
short warren
#

it was y^2

last falcon
#

yea

short warren
#

to find a common denominator, i multiplied it by 49

last falcon
#

y^2*49=?

short warren
#

you said i had to make all the terms have the same denominator

#

so i multiplied the top and bottom of y²/1

last falcon
#

i meant to find a least common multiplier of 49 and 7

#

which is 49

#

now in order for y^2/1 to get to a denominator of 49

#

u gotta also multiply y^2

short warren
#

why tho?

#

i dont understand

last falcon
#

okay wait a sec

short warren
#

y² is rlly just y²/1

so, to make it have 49 as the denominator, i have to multiply both the numerator and thw denominator with 49.

last falcon
#

yes

short warren
#

i cant just multiply the denominator and leave the numerator alone.... right?

last falcon
#

thats right

short warren
#

oh

last falcon
#

bc then it wont be equal to each other

#

y^2/1 is not equal to y^2/49 right

short warren
#

49y²/49 is equal to y²

last falcon
#

which is equal to y^2 and y^2/1

short warren
#

yes

last falcon
#

u just expanded the fraction to make it easier for u to work with

short warren
#

i just realised

last falcon
#

say u had 2/3 + 4/6

#

how would u solve this

short warren
last falcon
#

yea

short warren
#

i forgot to put the ²

#

Sorry i messed up 😓

last falcon
#

its okay

short warren
#

i was in a rush

last falcon
#

no problem

#

fix it up and wel solve it

last falcon
#

can u spot another mistake?

#

that 80-8y/7 should have been 80+8y/7

#

u still there?

short warren
#

uhhhhhhh

grizzled stream
short warren
last falcon
#

mhm

grizzled stream
#

it should be (-80-8y)/7

last falcon
#

yea but since he put a minus there

#

it became -80y+8y/7

short warren
#

SO THAT'S WHERE I WENT WRONG

last falcon
#

yea no worries just change it up

#

should be easy from there

short warren
#

i kept getting the right answer but in negative

short warren
last falcon
#

after u get that u should solve it with the quadratic formula

#

will be easier

#

oh and dont forget to find x after u found y

short warren
#

right right

#

thanks for the help

last falcon
#

no problem :)

short warren
#

that was long sheesh😣

last falcon
#

phew at least we got it

short warren
#

rlly appreciate it man 🙏

last falcon
#

my pleasure

#

do ,.close if u dont have any more questions

short warren
#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @short warren

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

hexed tide
#

How do I do this question?

obtuse pebbleBOT
hexed tide
#

I don’t understand what I’m supposed to do

grizzled stream
#

you're supposed to simplify the expression

royal shard
#

$x^{a}\cdot x^{b}=x^{a+b}$

grizzled stream
#

try using the exponent laws

warm shaleBOT
#

~Martin

royal shard
#

$\frac{1}{x^{a}}=x^{-a}$

warm shaleBOT
#

~Martin

hexed tide
#

The answer I got for it was (10p^2)/p

#

I don’t understand how to continue

fierce lagoon
#

Simplify

#

Because p^2 = p • p

#

So you gotta recall that $\frac{p^a}{p^b} = p^{a-b}$

warm shaleBOT
#

Umbraleviathan

hexed tide
#

I don’t understand

#

Wait so would it be 9p^2?

#

Please help, I still don’t understand

#

<@&286206848099549185> I don’t know what the correct answer for this is. Can you explain how to do the last step please?

#

.close

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @hexed tide

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

obtuse pebbleBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

tall arrow
#

find the exact value for sine 45
I'm new to trigonometry, and from what I know, in order to solve this problem you would have to draw an actual right triangle with an angle being 45 degrees. This is easy for 30-60-90 degree triangles, but I can't really find/draw sides of a triangle when angle is not equal to 30 or 60

tall arrow
#

How should I approach this problem?

thick oracle
#

sin 45 degrees?

tall arrow
#

yeah

timid silo
#

bisecting an angle of 90 degrees gives you 45

tall arrow
#

I know what all the triangle's angles are, just not the sides

timid silo
#

there is a known method in geometry to draw a bisector of an angle. You apply it to the 90 degree angle in a right triangle

timid silo
#

try for example a right triangle with sides 3, 4, 5 (we know it's possible because 5^2 = 4^2 + 3^2)

#

then bisect the right angle

thick oracle
#

i've done it

#

so

#

we need a right and isosceles triangle

tall arrow
#

the term "bisect" is new to me

silver fox
#

You dont need to draw a correct triangle

tall arrow
#

so I can simply do the 30-60-90 one?

silver fox
#

What do all the angles add up to?

#

No

tall arrow
#

180

thick oracle
silver fox
#

U have to reason on the correct one

#

But u dont have to draw it perfect

#

Ok so whats the other angle gonna be

thick oracle
#

seed

#

can i explain?

tall arrow
#

It would be 45, too, since all right triangles have 90 degree angles, and sine (45) tells you that the second side is 45 degrees, making the third one 45 degrees too, since a right triangle has 180 degrees total
the thing that i can't understand is how you can use that information to find the sides of triangle

thick oracle
#

or do you want ninja to explain

silver fox
#

Well given that 2 angles are the same you will have symmetry

tall arrow
#

Both your explanations are valuable to me

thick oracle
#

ok ninja explain first

silver fox
#

So call one of the smaller sides x

#

U cant actually figure out what the sides are although u can figure out their ratios

#

If all you know are the angles

tall arrow
#

Okay, with only angles in our hand, how do we do so?
SOH-CAH-TOA won't be applicable in this situation

silver fox
#

Yes it will just apply pythagorean to the triangle to get all the sides in terms of x

#

Both of the smaller sides are the same length