#help-10
1 messages · Page 3 of 1
No, it's filled up to 0.25ft from the top, so from the floor up to 1.5-0.25=1.25ft
And it asks you to find the volume of the water, not how much water you need to fill up the pool
so my eq would be V=pi 6^2 x 1.25
and then is that the answer
Maybe you can convert it to yard³ as you did before, but yeah, that's the answer
ok so just divide by 27 again
Result:
5.235987755983
Yes
thank you.
You're welcome
.close
Closed by @eternal dome
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Please take a minute to participate in [our survey](#changelog message) if you haven't already!
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is the part I painted yellow correct?
the entire problem is
@mighty pelican Has your question been resolved?
@mighty pelican Has your question been resolved?
@mighty pelican Has your question been resolved?
@mighty pelican Has your question been resolved?
I asked about the part where I found dz/dt @rotund canyon
Oh
Yeah you're right it's the long way
Yess 🥂 😎
I'll be careful:)
@rotund canyon
can you check my solution
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Please take a minute to participate in [our survey](#changelog message) if you haven't already!
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
just wanted to confirm, it's 20 right?
yes
@heavy summit Has your question been resolved?
yes
Closed by @heavy summit
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Please take a minute to participate in [our survey](#changelog message) if you haven't already!
tytyty
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help solving an equation math problem
just ask
It says 25.
so 25 is the t
Yes.
Why would you do that?
What is t?
25?
the derivative of sx and this comes from triangle similarity rule
so do I need to divide 35 divide by 25
Divide 35 by 25.
ok
This will be your exponent.
Okay got it
so 2 to the power of 0.71..
I forgot how to solve the next step
Would you multiple 2 by 0.71?
You're allowed to use a calculator, right?
Yea
this question is almost the same
but its saying how many wolves were present at the beginning
so Idk how to solve the t
what would u do to solve the t
the beginning.
How many years have passed?
none
so what is t?
0?
Yes.
Yep
that's right.
500 wolves were present
alr thx
i got like some few more questions if u dont mind sticking around
so about this graph..
Im not sure how to solve for the x
@floral canopy are u there
<@&286206848099549185> Please help me with this graph and teach me how to solve x
thanks
x-intercept is when y=0
(0,0), (4, 0)
yes
cool, thanks
wow its easier than I thought
anyways I have like 2 or 3 more questions if u dont mind helping me
im not too sure how to solve that by using 10 and 13
do u mind helping me on this one
Pythagoras theorem?
u know pythogreas
yes
use it
Do you need the formula
Look at this picture
https://images.app.goo.gl/q3YgX2Q2Wo1y26f96
oh I just searched up pythagorem theorum and it just gives me like a calculator for it
i got the answer, thanks
Do you know how to simplify radicals or is your teacher ok with not simplifying them
yeah she wants the simplified form
Alright so what’s the unsimplified radical
So she doesn’t want you to simplify
Ok so what’s the radical
16.4 cm
ye she just wants me to write how much cm is on the other side of the triangle
How many decimal places
1
Then you’re fine
Pythagorean theorem again
Where c is hypotenuse
Nope
so its 6.3?
You need to use trig functions
oh..
SOH CAH TOA
Im not too familiar with it
Because it's asking for the angle
so what would my first step be in solving it
Worked example evaluating sine and cosine using soh cah toa definition.
Practice this lesson yourself on KhanAcademy.org right now:
https://www.khanacademy.org/math/trigonometry/basic-trigonometry/basic_trig_ratios/e/trigonometry_0.5?utm_source=YT&utm_medium=Desc&utm_campaign=Trigonometry
Watch the next lesson: https://www.khanacademy.org/mat...
Watch some videos on that
Here's one
k ty
@stable hawk sin cos or tan which one to use
cos?
Try again
sin
angle b doesnt have a number
sin=opposite/hypotenuse
3
So sin(b) is?
2.3?
Use fractions
I did 7 over 3
0.42
Use fractions
1 more step
Do you know inverse trigonometric functions
nope
% Openglobe %
$\theta=sin^-1 (\frac{a}{b})$
% Openglobe %
So you calculate sin^-1(3/7)
i dont believe I need to do that extra step, 0.43 is the answer I need
thanks for helping tho
That angle is too small
It’s not an extra step
alr
It’s a required step
Yes
i would get the answer?
Yes
thats correct right
this is the last question I need to do
and im finished for my homework assignment
im not too sure what it means by factored form
ye
2?
That’s a factor but not the greatest one
im not sure
Do you know t*t=t^2
So what’s the GCF of t^2 and t
Why the -2
im not too sure
t can be split into t and 1
t^2 can be split into t and t
ok
Therefore the GCF is?
t
So it would be 6t()
what would be inside the bracket
6t^2/ 6t is?
This is the first number inside the bracket
um
i cant calculate this
Just one t
Closed by @stable hawk
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Please take a minute to participate in [our survey](#changelog message) if you haven't already!
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
again
wait.. is this an exam?
no
Assessment?
Why is this hard
im young
@jagged arrow Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @jagged arrow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Please take a minute to participate in [our survey](#changelog message) if you haven't already!
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$\vec{x} = \sum_{j = 1}^{n} \langle \vec{e_{j}}, \vec{x} \rangle \vec{e_{j}} = \sum_{j= 1}^{n} \left( \sum_{i = 1}^{j} e_i x_{i} \right)\vec{e_{j}}$
am I doing this right? I'm not sure if this is how u expand these fuck you latec
finally omg
What's your question?
if this expansion is correct
should be e_i*x_i
texaspb :rainbow:
yes
wait
okay
how many components do these vectors have
I'm just gonna post the entire question
are they vectors in R^n
Show that the bilinear form $\langle \vec{x},\vec{y} \rangle = \sum_{j=1}^{n} x_{j}y_{j}$ in $V = \bR^{n}$ is a scalar product in V. If $S ={\vec{e}{1}, \dots, \vec{e}{n}}$ is the standard basis of V and $\vec{x} \in V$, show that we can write: \
$$\vec{x} = \sum_{j=1}^{n} \langle \vec{e}{j}, \vec{x} \rangle \vec{e}{j}$$
did you miss a = right after the S
yes thanks ann
texaspb :rainbow:
ok so the inside sum should be up to n
and u should write e_{ji} for the ith component of e_j
$\vec{x} = \sum_{j = 1}^{n} \langle \vec{e_{j}}, \vec{x} \rangle \vec{e_{j}} = \sum_{j= 1}^{n} \left( \sum_{i = 1}^{n} e_{ji} x_{i} \right)\vec{e_{j}}$
texaspb :rainbow:
how does this work tho i'm confused
its just using the def of dot product
I don't get the e_ji indexing
e_j is the jth basis vector
each vector has n components
so e_{ji} is a way to write the ith component of the jth basis vector
alright
I think I got it, if there's any questions left I'll post in the linagl channel
thank you so much as always
np
.close
Closed by @hasty crag
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Please take a minute to participate in [our survey](#changelog message) if you haven't already!
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How can we be certain pq is tangent to that circle
@fluid meadow Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@fluid meadow Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Please take a minute to participate in [our survey](#changelog message) if you haven't already!
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
am i correct?
,w calculate cos(pi)
You got it
Closed by @smoky panther
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Please take a minute to participate in [our survey](#changelog message) if you haven't already!
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i solve this?
try graphing sin(x)
okay, and roughly plot x=4
okay yup
what on a graph represents instantaneous rate of change
slope of tangent line
right so you're gonna need to eyeball the slope of the tangent line to sin(x) at x=4
luckily the answers to choose from are very different
so then wont it be -0.65?
i would agree with you
great, thanks for helpin
youre welcome!
.close
Closed by @smoky panther
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Please take a minute to participate in [our survey](#changelog message) if you haven't already!
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
so you have the right triangle with one leg equals 4.5 and hypotenuse equals 5, can you find the another leg?
treat it as a rhombus (every square is a rhombus) and use the formula with the diagonals or find the side length of a base
in order to do that use Pythag or just property of the triangle 45, 45 and 90
what's your diagonal
5
nope, result from a)
let's say, but it's approximate
Yea
Result:
4.3588989435407
ok
so now let's say the side length of the base is equal to x, ok?
Ok
ok
so the opp and adj is equal to x
basically
x^2 + x^2 = (4.4)^2
can you solve it?
2x^2
Oh
like an apple + apple = two apples
Closed by @jaunty stirrup
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Please take a minute to participate in [our survey](#changelog message) if you haven't already!
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed due to the original message being deleted
Please take a minute to participate in [our survey](#changelog message) if you haven't already!
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what gives, why are they dropping the divided by twos but not the + 1?
oh i see, they're adding 0.5cn + 0.5cn
Would you mind taking an image where the whole sentence above is in it, I'm just wondering what it says
that'd be the first thing i'm correct on today
But it is not exactly adding halves but more so that say if n were 13, then it would be adding 6c and 7c
Which gives the 13
right right
what about this one:
show that the sltn of T(n) = T(n-1) + n is O(n^2)
.close
Closed by @frank abyss
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Please take a minute to participate in [our survey](#changelog message) if you haven't already!
i need to understand how to do it
You might want to reopen
.reopen
✅
Thanks
Ok, so I'll talk through the inequalities going on here
First we assume that
,,T(n-1) \leq c(n-1)^2
Social Capital Gainer
Social Capital Gainer
Social Capital Gainer
,,T(n-1) +n \leq c(n-1)^2 +n
Social Capital Gainer
Social Capital Gainer
Social Capital Gainer
Social Capital Gainer
you're going much too fast here
why do they square the n in c(n-1) term and not the next n
Social Capital Gainer
That one?
yes. i would like you to assume i know nothing and walk me through step by step, if you have the time
i've been studying this stuff for awhile now but it's not clicking
i get why the assumption becomes c*n^2
given the definition of O and whatnot
yes sure
so we have T(n) = T(n-1) + n
and our inductive hypothesis is that this will be in O(n^2)
let's set aide the "c is taken to be max(somestuff)" bc i don't understand that
Ok I will address the induction parts
why do you not only square the n inside the first term
why do you square the entire (n-1)
Basically we have some statement dependent on integers n which we need to prove is true for all n. That statement is T(n) <= cn^2
I will explain why
Usually in an inductive argument, we assume some step, say n=k, then show that if we assume this, this implies that the next case for n=k+1 must also be true
In this question however
They are assuming the n-1 case
i don't think so
the recurrence is just given by T(n) = T(n-1)+n that's just it mathematically before any induction or hypothesis
the assumption is that T(n) <= cn^2
That is the recurrence relation, but given this recurrence relation it is easier to assume n-1 and prove n rather than assume n and prove n+1. They both will give the same result, but assuming n-1 lets us apply the recurrence relation straight away, so that is what they do
They finish by showing that T(n) <= cn^2
I disagree with what tlu have labelled as the cn^2 expression, that is not the cn^2 expression, that is something we will show is less than or equal to the cn^2 expression
Hence showing that T(n)<=cn^2
by transitive property?
Social Capital Gainer
Now add n to both sides
We assumed the n-1 case
Of the expression we want to prove which is
T(n)<=cn^2
Change n with n-1
why is it (n-1)^2, why isn't it c((n^2)-1))
Because n is the variable
Say that n=7
Then
T(7)<=c7^2
Also
T(6)<=c6^2
6 is the n-1, 7 is the n
i don't understand
Another way to think about it is like this
Take this as an example, the function f(n)=n^2
Evaluate f(3) for me
9
Evaluate f(w) for me, where w is some number
w^2
Evaluate f(w-1)
ah ok
(w-1)^2
bc that variable can be any expression
Yes exactly
ok
So we set n to n-1 in
T(n)<=cn^2
To get
T(n-1)<=c(n-1)^2
It's kinda clunky
If i were proving this I would say
Set n=k-1
T(n)<=cn^2
T(k-1)<=c(k-1)^2
So that it flows a bit better
Does that make sense?
i mean sort of except that we're replacing n-1 in for n it terms of T on the left and replacing T with c on the right
anyway i guess we now have T(n-1) = c(n-1)^2 + n
T (n) = T (n − 1) + n ≤ c(n − 1)^2 + n
to get from the first expression, to the one on the right hand side of the equality, we replace T with c
I think you are confusing the brackets here a bit. The brackets in T(n-1) belong to the function T
Like saying f(3)=9
The brackets in c(n-1)^2 are normal brackets like 3(x+y)=3x+3y
You cant expand T(n-1) into Tn -T
oh i thought we were plugging in stuff into the left hand side to get the right, but we're plugging it into the T(n) <= cn^2 statement
Yes, n is a variable and we are plugging stuff into it
Ok, but does that make sense now
so we haven't actually done anything yet except taken the original expression and set it less than or equal to cn^2 where n = n-1
Yes that's what we've done so far
but just to be clear
We assume the n-1 case and want to use it to prove the n case
T(n) = T(n-1) + n is the original recurrence
so there is no n-1 added yet anywhere
no substitutions
Um, yeah not yet
all we did was take it as is and set equal to c(n-1)^2
Yeah
well less than or equal to
Social Capital Gainer
We are just about to get that
right they are adding +n to both sides I guess.. why
wait no here it's only added to the cn^2 side
It is so that we can form T(n-1) +n, which we recognise is equal to T(n)
That will let us get the left hand side of T(n)<=cn^2 which is what we want. We need to use what we have assumed to get the next case, the n case
it looks like all they did so far was square n-1 on the right hand side and then add a (+ n)
Yes, they started with this and added n to both sides
To get
,,T(n-1) +n \leq c(n-1)^2 +n
that is its native form
Social Capital Gainer
T(n-1) + n is the original recurrence. there has been no +n added
No, we did that, going from left to right in that string of inequalities does not reflect the logical order in which it was obtained
otherwise it'd be in the form T(n-1)+2n
So lets follow the train of thought as I am presenting it and it will hopefully become clear
We go from
,,T(n-1) \leq c(n-1)^2
Social Capital Gainer
Social Capital Gainer
ok
Cool
So now looking at the left hand side of this, we recognise that T(n-1)+n is exactly just equal to T(n), so we can replace the entire left hand side with T(n)
,,T(n) \leq c(n-1)^2 +n
Social Capital Gainer
This is because T(n-1) +n is exactly the same as T(n) so I can interchange them
Yes this is how they got
They tacked on T(n)= onto the left of
What we made
Social Capital Gainer
You want to expand the quadratic on the right
Ye, and a 2
c*(n^2 - n - 1)
Its not just-n
ah shit i added the +n in there
Ah
c*(n^2 - 2n - 1) + n
Yep
ok so now what
Now expand that bracket too so that there is a c on every term that needs one
T(n) <= cn^2 - 2cn + c + n
actually in the form its in it takes the form of the answer, the cn^2 bit
Yes exactly we have all the pieces we need, and some extra ones too which we have to deal with
ah shucks
Social Capital Gainer
This is where we are
Note that I disagree with the screenshot of the solution you posted
I don't believe what they have written is completely correct
Could you post that screen shot again
Yeah so they say that
i mean the book says "show that the solution is O(n^2)"
,, c(n-1)^2+n=cn^2+(1-2c)n+1
Social Capital Gainer
That is right, but this step is wrong
As we just showed
It should be +c and not +1
ok
well this is where i am
Yep, so factor n from -2cn and +n
n(cn - 2c) + c + n
n(2c + 1)
Social Capital Gainer
Is that ok ?
Ye, now factor out n from the second and third terms only
i get -n(2c+1)
how do you factor cn^2 - 2cn + n + c for just n what happened to the -
Social Capital Gainer
Yea?
yeah i have to write it a different way but yes
Ok, I wrote it that way so it is as close as possible to what your answers have
oh i'm not even looking at that
Social Capital Gainer
What this means is
the value of c will be set to whichever of 1 or T(1) is biggest
Therefore either
c=1, so 1>T(1)
Or
c=T(1), so T(1)>1
lol what
oh ok
i mean, it's more helpful to just look at 1 or T(1) and check which is largest, but how do we evaluate T(1)
i don't even know which T we would plug that into or what c would be
We don't, we just have to acknowledge that it can either be bigger or less than 1
We don't even need to know what number it is
You will see why
Lets look at the first possibility, that 1>T(1)
Therefore c=1
We can use that in our inequality
,,T(n) \leq cn^2 +(1-2c)n+c
Social Capital Gainer
wat
It will help us get the result we need
cn^2 - n + 1
Yes
Now because we are dealing with natural numbers, what is the smallest value that n could be?
1
Social Capital Gainer
Because n will make the left hand side smaller or at most equal to the right hand side
We are subtracting a number n that is bigger than or equal to 1
i cannot look at something with so many variables and inherently know anything. what i said before was a guess. i was lost as soon as we plugged in something for most things but not every term in the expression
Sometimes we can be flexible like that, what we did was not wrong, it is just a slightly different way of writing it
Here is an example
h=5
h+h+h+h+h
Can be written as
5+5+5+5+5
Or
h+h+h+5+5
Is that wrong?
no
was this bc 1 is the min of natural numbers or because we evaluated something
Because 1 is the min of the natural numbers
ok i think i need to take a break from all this stuff. thank you for your time
sure i mean i have other examples we could work.. what time is good for you
I dunno, you take a break and dm me I guess
I can talk for a little longer later on to finish this example, but maybe not for other examples
Just in terms of time
Almost yeah
I actually could have done the very last thing we did a little more simply
I dunno
There are several ways to go about it
I think what I would recommend for you is to practice inequalities questions in general, as I feel that is mkstly what we have been discussing
its a bit frustrating for me bc i have this algorithms course coming up and i am focusing on solutions to the book problems found online but i don't know exactly where i should be focusing. i guess i could look over the example homeworks i have access to and try to find similar ones in the book
Well I would still try to practice inequalities questions if you can find any
Bio informatics
That's cool
correct. and unfortunately its a little too much like mathe matics 😂
Haha, that's what makes it cool imo
no totally just not my strong suit. anyhow, thanks again
No problem, feel free to ping me a message if you have a specific question I might try find some inequalities questions and send them
If you would like
ok that's probably a good idea
no thanks have a good one
You too
.close
Closed by @frank abyss
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Please take a minute to participate in [our survey](#changelog message) if you haven't already!
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Alright, so let's set up some dummy variables for the regular and the expanded
I'm gonna use r for regular, p for expanded
You can set up a system of equations from that
$$r + p = 650$$
$$25r + 65p = 21250$$
$$r, p\in\bN$$
Umbraleviathan
You can't sell half a board, r and p must be natural numbers
Just as a reminder in case you somehow get half a board
Or something
I have a question unrelated to the original problem
does the set of natural numbers include zero? or is it included in the set of whole numbers?
It does include 0, sometimes
$\bN$ is similar to $\bZ^{+}$, sometimes 0
Umbraleviathan
@leaden elbow
I mean it's not much of an interruption
Still I'd rather you make a separate help channel
yes
yea i did thus
this*
but its not giving me the right answer
You sure?
I got natural number answers
k im following my teachers steps and let me shoiw u
im confused where she got 43.5 from
This is a different question
That's because 0.50 • 87 = 43.5
She distributed the 0.50
And yeah you follow the same
I did it similarly
65(650-r) = 65(650) - 65r
are we substituting it the same bc u said you are doing it similarly
cause i got 323 and that doesnt seem right
yea
No that's not right
mb i was jus following what my teacher was showing
we can say
r = 650 - p
so
25(650 - p) + 65p = 21,250
25*650 - 25p + 65p = 21,250
40p + 25 * 650 = 21,250
from here you can find p
then find r
p=125? r=525?
✅
Closed by @leaden elbow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Please take a minute to participate in [our survey](#changelog message) if you haven't already!
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help please?
y = 5x - 3
y = -6x + 8
we can say that 5x - 3 is equal to -6x + 8, can’t we?
since they’re both equal to y
do i put that in a calculator?
is it 1?
i put it in a calculator
Lol
do you know how to solve equations?
not really
alright so do you see how you can add 6x to both sides of this equation?
it cancels the -6x + 6x on the right side
im on this now
we want to collect the like terms on one side of the equation
please don’t use this thread
im really new to algebra, i dont really understand it
hmm
perhaps you should find a youtube video on how to solve basic equations
if you’re not already learning it
it’d odd that you’re doing systems of equations without knowing how to solve a single variable equation first lol
then start taking the algebra courses
i would really just like to understand this first
yeah and you need a basic knowledge of equations to do this though
like 5x - 3 = -6x + 8
how come?
wait actually i think B i think the y step goes after that
oh
eliminating x^2.. I dunno how you’d even do that
okay so this one would be A now
no
you need a better grasp of algebra.. I can’t really explain everything here lol
but in short, solving a quadratic (with x^2) requires you to set it equal to 0
dividing both sides by x^2 just makes things more complicated
use Khan Academy like headshotcem suggested
is it free?
yeah
okay
https://www.khanacademy.org/math @timid silo
im not sure if its B or not because theres no Y only x