#help-10
1 messages · Page 2 of 1
Why integrate?
eh not really, except for the fact you are substituting something
the idea behind subbing in integration is a bit different
but ig in general, subbing usually leads to some kind of helpful simplification that makes your problem easier, thats the link
ah okay, tldr im taking a calc 1 placement so i learned everything in differentation this year in senior year
and i gotta teach myself integration but for now im just reviewing stuff i kinda forgot
That’s a good first step
Because if you don’t know the fundamentals, you won’t be able to do the fun stuff
Closed by @devout tapir
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Please take a minute to participate in [our survey](#changelog message) if you haven't already!
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
try to use P=id and D=A
why would D=A? you know it's diagonal?
Use the definition of eigen vector and eigenvalue for A and your given two eigenvectors
have you ever diagonalized a 2x2 matrix?
i recommend watching
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2nLtBBatGt8
We diagonalise a 2x2 matrix, after finding its eigenvalues and eigenvectors in a previous video: https://youtu.be/tXlMbAxbUI4
@slow timber Has your question been resolved?
@slow timber did you watch the video
it basically gives you the whole answer
because their software sucks
any order will give you a correct diagonalization
because you screwed up the determinant
your P^-1 was wrongly calculated that's my point
in the first attempt
,w {{1, 3}, {-2, -7}}
you prolly forgot a minus somewhere while typing in wolfram
let's see it their software works
ah ok it is decent then
yeah I'm too quick on judging automated marking software lol
Closed by @slow timber
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Please take a minute to participate in [our survey](#changelog message) if you haven't already!
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
1 remains unanswered
.close
Closed by @misty valve
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Please take a minute to participate in [our survey](#changelog message) if you haven't already!
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do i discover the interval of integration for a sphere out of origin?
@fathom sedge Has your question been resolved?
If you can agree the sphere is x^2 + y^2 + (z - 2)^2 = 4 then expanding gives us x^2 + y^2 + z^2 - 4z = 0.
Can you see how you can now use spherical coordinates? @fathom sedge
not really, i mean, i see that i have a sphere and all, but idk how to go from that sphere equation to the interval i need with the right jacobian
You probably know a formula for rho in terms of x, y and z and also for z in rho and phi.
p^2 = x^2 + y^2 + z^2 and
z = p cos(phi).
yep
Okay, i think i got it
not enough to answer you, but i think i might be able to work some more
you just used the x=p*sin(phi)cos(theta), same for y and z in the equation and got it in terms of rho and phi
rho will go from 0 to 4cos(phi) i think?
that helped a lot to understand what to do
You could do that with x, y and z but you can get the result directly with a understanding of where spherical coordinates comes* from but you have the correct bounds assuming I've made no errors.
*Pythagoras.
thats clever, i hadnt think about that tbh, but i can
i'm used to do x y and z cause its a recent subject for me, ty
Keep practicing you'll get it. Can you complete your problem now?
Closed by @fathom sedge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Please take a minute to participate in [our survey](#changelog message) if you haven't already!
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@willow ravine Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
assume z0 = costheta+isintheta
I know e^(x+iy)
we dont have any relation for this na
??
That is equal to e^x(cosy + isiny)
In my problem I only have the e^x part
e^Z0
I need to use Rouche’s Theorem
oh fine
i assumed z0 to be a complex number
got it.
@willow ravine Has your question been resolved?
you want your inequality for rouché's theorem to be the one that you already know to be true
so pick f and g such that f+g = e^z0 - az0, and f = e^z0
probably
I haven't actually tried this
yeah f(z) = e^z, g(z) = -az
I don’t see what good that does me to show these two functions have the same number of zeroes
It will lead to a contradiction
if you take a moment to think about it
Remember the goal is to prove a contradiction
Let me think on it.
If I do this then I’m not sure how to simplify it. I get e^|z0| + a|z0| < e^|z0|
After using the triangle inequality
oh
you don't need the triangle inequality
Hmmm
for this problem
Do I use the fact that this assumption shows e^z -az and az have the same number of zeroes?
Then show somehow e^z - az does not have any zeroes?
But az does.
Basically Roache’s theorem
Wait
I can’t use az in roache’s
🪳's theorem 🤣
Because z= r will always contain z = 0
Yeah, I’m degrading this for a reason
I hate this theorem and I know it’s going to be on the exam
For some reason it is so hard to understand the many different ways to use it, decide a function, show a contradiction.
I am not enjoying it at all.
If every theorem was given a degrading name because one student had a hard time understanding it, everything would be roach's theorem
We should do this. I like this idea.
That way when I use something I don’t have to think of a hard name, everything can just be roach’s theorem.
"hard name" lol
Would this imply that e^z -az has one zero then set it equal to zero and then you got e^z = az
wait what are you choosing as f and g again?
F: e^z0
G: -az
I think I had it backwards
I should have then e^z -az has the same number of zeroes as e^z
Wait f and g
Not f+g and f
So az and e^z have the same number of zeroes
Which is a contradiction since e^z is not zero?
This shows there exists at least one |z0| = r such that: (insert the problems statement again).
@slim cove
yup
Okay! Thank you so much! I’m going to get some sleep now. Have a good one @slim cove
good night!!
.close
Closed by @willow ravine
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Please take a minute to participate in [our survey](#changelog message) if you haven't already!
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How to add and subtract polynomials
https://youtu.be/0aJBtUOXpsk like this?
We just learned what polynomials are, but that's not going to be enough! We have to learn how to add, subtract, multiply, and divide them. Let's start with the easy operations, addition and subtraction!
Watch the whole Mathematics playlist: http://bit.ly/ProfDaveMath
Classical Physics Tutorials: http://bit.ly/ProfDavePhysics1
Modern Physics Tu...
Yeah
@woven mantle Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @woven mantle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Please take a minute to participate in [our survey](#changelog message) if you haven't already!
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello! Could anyone kindly explain to me the underlined portion of the solution, thanks 🙂
do you understand why six vectors are in the plane x + y + z + w + c = 0 for some constant c
hm not really :😓
I know that there must be dependence since 6 vectors cannot exist independently in R^4
(1, 1, 1, 1) is a normal vector to the plane above
so when all the v vectors are dotted with that normal vector result in zero, that implies all 6 vectors are in that plane
a 2d version of that would be having vectors u1, u2, u3, u4 and when dotted with (1, 1) results in zero, then all of the u are on the line x + y + c = 0
or y=-x + c
Oh I see it now, each v . (1, 1, 1, 1) gives 0, hence all the V(s) lie in this plane?
plane with normal of (1,1,1,1)
yes
wait but if it's a plane, means the basis of it is 2 independent vectors
but v1, v2 and v3 are independent?
errr, i mean hyperplane* everywhere
this is the equation of a hyperplane in 4d

.close
Closed by @sonic cape
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Please take a minute to participate in [our survey](#changelog message) if you haven't already!
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, I need help proving a limit of a sequence using the definition.
Showing that for all e > 0, there exists N which is a natural number, such that for all n > N, |a_n - L| < e
I understand the definition and the objective, but I am the type that likes everything to be perfect so I'm finding it hard to formulate the proof.
what are you stuck on?
just show the problem and your work
what is the sequence and what is your N?
$a_n = \sqrt{\frac{4n+1}{n}}, L=2$
RedstonePlayz09
So I took:
$\abs{a_n - L}$
RedstonePlayz09
RedstonePlayz09
But now I don't exactly know how to write the proof
show your full work for this
Okay
how did you establish that |a_n - L| < 1/n?
How do I type <= in latex?
how do I do less?
just <?
wait
I have a mistake
well I'll come back when I manage to get through this part
But one of my questions is
do I start with < epsilon
or just simplify |a_n - L|
your goal is to present a value of N (in terms of epsilon) and verify that it works.
yup
you've already presented N := ceil(1/epsilon)
we care not how you found this
but do verify that it works
it's wrong I think
well whether it's wrong or not you still have yet to present any work
$N = \ceil{\frac{1}{\epsilon * (\epsilon + 4)}}$
RedstonePlayz09
yes my previous point still stands
okay I'll try
use \cdot if you want an explicit multiplication symbol btw
(or just write nothing at all)
example of "work" for this proof
more examples here: https://dsury.com/content/images/104/104-lec4.pdf
alright I'll try doing that
this could be right. you just haven't justified it with the level of details required like the examples.
and for the purposes of the proof
I got it from |a_n - L| < epsilon
really nobody gives a shit about justification
by isolating n
redstoneplayz09, when you presented your value of N for the first time, i asked you to present your work for finding |a_n - L| < 1/n
but you backed out
why was that?
I sent it
but noticed a mistake
so I deleted it
its wrong
I wrote something + 2 < something
which is... false
this is something i got from another attempt I had before that
but wasn't sure how to continue
so ok
can you send your rough work or something
(by the way, it is true that |a_n - L| < 1/n.)
some of these aren't obviously true
since I did these steps backwards at first, so I still have to justify a few things
also forgot to add abs at the end
i suppose this might work, though it does feel a little inelegant
yeah this is why I wasn't sure about starting with < epsilon
also u said that it is true that |a_n - L| < 1/n
if it is, I could choose N = ceil{1/epsilon} and it should work right
indeed
so basically start with |a_n - L|, and show that it is less than some other expression
\begin{align*}
\absv{\sqrt{\frac{4n+1}{n}} - 2} &= \absv{\frac{\sqrt{4n+1}-2\sqrt{n}}{\sqrt{n}}} \ & = \absv{\frac{4n+1-4n}{\sqrt{n}(\sqrt{4n+1}+2\sqrt{n})}} \ & = \frac{1}{\sqrt{n}(\sqrt{4n+1}+2\sqrt{n})} \ & = \frac{1}{\sqrt{4n^2+2n} + 2n} \ & < \frac{1}{2n}
\end{align*}
okay and u did that because 1/2n is easily to isolate n from
that's the point right?
the first time was good
hold on
Ann
there
okay so
in fact an even stronger statement is true
is this part of the proof or a draft
but you do not really need to find "the best" N that works
well this chain of inequalities can go either way tbh
if i were writing a proof i would include this almost as-is
ceil(1/(2ε)) if you insist
n > N > 1/2n > .... > |a_n-L|
yes I meant that
n > N > 1/2n > .... > |a_n-L|
bad
okay so why is that bad?
$|a_n - L| < \frac{1}{2n} < \frac{1}{2N} \leq \frac{1}{2 \cdot \frac{1}{2\ep}} = \ep$
im getting confused
(even this is kind of pushing it)
Ann
okay so I get this work but
im still confused..
give me a sec to think about it
I would do it like this
n > N = ceil{1/(2ε)} >= 1/(2ε) > ... > |a_n - L|
so I dont understand
how you thought of doing it this way
And also u didn't explain here why 1/(2n) is bigger than |a_n - L|, that would require the draft
you should read this carefully
what do you mean
did you read it carefully?
yes
which is the first inequality here
then why don't you understand this
I dont understand how they thought of doing 1/(2n) < 1/(2N) ....
oh
"for all n > N"
wait
I think I got it
n > N = ... > 1/(2ε)
therefore n > 1/(2ε)
ε > 1/(2n) > |a_n - L|
so my only problem now is showing that this is true in both directions
in different problems it might not
okay you know what, I think I understand enough to try it on my own now
@royal basin @tardy epoch thanks for the help!
read the links
Closed by @brisk grove
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Please take a minute to participate in [our survey](#changelog message) if you haven't already!
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I found the solution
but idk how to work it out manually
to find which one belongs to ker(A)
nvm
I thijnk
I figured it out
.closed
.close
Closed by @loud egret
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Please take a minute to participate in [our survey](#changelog message) if you haven't already!
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I go about solving this?
Considering its a multiple choice question, I assume it needs to be done pretty quickly but I just can't figure out how to solve it.
you can differentiate all your answers and see if they equal your integrand
so that'll eliminate B and C
lol okay maybe not
since I can easily integrate them in my head
oh unless I've done something wrong 😂
Use
$$ \tan^2 X = \sec^2 X -1$$
D3VC
You need to find which one has a derivative of tan^2
ah okay that makes a lot more sense
I'm pretty washed up with my trig
ok thanks!
.close
Closed by @ornate pollen
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Please take a minute to participate in [our survey](#changelog message) if you haven't already!
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello 👋. i need a not very easy, but not hard definite integral that solves in 524. i’m not that good at integrals and can only think of simplest integrals, but maybe someone can think of an interesting integral which solution is 524?
integral from sqrt(5) to 23 of 1/2 x
I mean how interesting are we talking
you could use interpolation to find some polynomial with p(0)=a and p(1)=b with b-a=524. then differentiate that polynomial to get f. then int from 0 to 1 of f dx gives 524
it seems to solve into 131
ah sorry I meant integral from sqrt(5) to 23 of 2x
yep, that fits! now i got at least one suitable integral, thank you very much. can you think of something a bit harder than this one? i’m not sure if we’re able to use trig functions since the answer should be integer.
i’ll note this to play with it myself later, thanks aswell.
well in general the best way to tackle this is probably to find some function with f(x)-f(y)=524 for some y<x
and well you could define all kinds of functions with that
but most of them probably seem very constructed
maybe write 524=67.5^2-63.5^2 and then construct f(x)=x^2cos(a*x) so that f(67.5)-f(63.5)=524
and if you want integer bounds maybe shift the input by 1/2 to one side
@next vigil Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @next vigil
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Please take a minute to participate in [our survey](#changelog message) if you haven't already!
thank you!
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Ive been trying to find out what values m will intersect and not intersect of the two lines below and I have no idea on how to find out, could someone please help?
do you know how to solve linear systems using matrices?
dont worry about that for now
you can use the fact that two lines (in 2d space) do not intersect if they are parallel (ie have the same slope) and aren't the same
so how do i solve the equation with that
find the slope of both lines, then see when they are equal
first one is 1 and the other would be 1/2 right?
no
the first one is right, the second isn't
write the second in the form y=ax+b
then a will be the slope
m/2?
when m = 2
yup
thank you bro
yw
.close
Closed by @jaunty lake
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Please take a minute to participate in [our survey](#changelog message) if you haven't already!
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What does it mean for tanx and tan2x must be defined? and How should I solve this question?
Let me know if this observation explains things or you need more help.
use compound angle formula
$tan(2x)=\frac{2tan(x)}{1-tan^2(x)}$
∆y/∆x=sin(x) + cos(y)
so u can rewrite the equation as
$\frac{2 tan^2(x)}{1-tan^2(x)}=1$
∆y/∆x=sin(x) + cos(y)
oh
wait
what grade are you
high school?
yeah grade 10
well I think they expect a different solution
coz u dont learn compound angle in grade 10
or have u?
the topic should involves anything between advanced functions to precalculus but harder than normal curriculums
have u learned $sin(2x), cos(2x)$ formulas either?
∆y/∆x=sin(x) + cos(y)
not really but I can look it up
so like $\frac{2tan^2(x)}{1-tan^2(x)}=1=sin2x$
Pikachuexeallen
@timid silo Has your question been resolved?
@timid silo Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @misty kite
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Please take a minute to participate in [our survey](#changelog message) if you haven't already!
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is (f+g)(x) always f(x)+g(x)?, and is it the same in reverse?
does it work like (sin+cos)(x)= sin(x)+ cos(x)?
I uh
I mean, yes and no??
Who the hell would use (sin+cos)(x)
I mean if f = sin(x) and g = cos(x), sure, yeah I guess but like
No one writes like that
ive just encountered this notation in book, so im curious what is going on
Yeah I mean stick to just single-letter functions
That are just dummy names like f and g
Its prolly useful for question makers
so f+g means f(x)+g(x) aways?
Yeah
I have seen functional equation questions like it
okay thanks that clears my doubt, and its the same for the other operators like f.g just means f(x).g(x)? and f/g means f(x)/g(x)?
wait a min, how do u know xcalibur🤣
Thats incredibly rare and impossible
💀
some server named debate lounge
Tbh those are rarely used to the point i wouldnt stress them and just go with gut instinct
f • g is multiply
f/g probably means to divide
Closed by @distant moth
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Please take a minute to participate in [our survey](#changelog message) if you haven't already!
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
For real values of k prove that 2kx^2+5x-k=0 always has two distinct real roots.
So this question reduces to:
8k^2+25>0
And i can just write some explanation to prove it
but mathematically solving the inequality gets me unreal values

<@&286206848099549185>
.
ok
why do you need to find k btw
@tardy stratus would u mind helping?
I want to find the range of k. Its not required.
k can be any real values tho
Square is always positive
i get that but
We're assuming k is real
.
the question specifies k as real
K can be any real value
ye ik
so the question is already answeres
d
but the inequality itself. and k's range is what i wanna know
yep but solving inequalities doesnt rlly show that
U can't use wavy curve
Cuz I think that's what I suppose ur using
Right?
The thing is it's never 0
u mean the parabola?
So u can't use factorization and solve it
Wavy curve method of finding solution to inequality
yes coz ksqr is always positive
U can use wavy curve on any rational solutions
Yes but there's no solution ie 0 here
idk what that is. i just factorize then check individual factors as inequalities. rather tedious. mind teaching me this wavy curve?
Yes thus is essentially the gist of wavy curve but it doesn't work here
Cuz factors are imaginary
And imaginary numbers cannot have any greater/lesser relation
So u just use the fact that x^2>0 (x belongs to R)
u sure abt that?
Yep
The factors arent imaginary here tho
5i isn't greater than 2i for example
what r they?
They should be real numbers
i'd say it is
Maybe they're irrational
Taking a look now
Irrational =/= imaginary
is it also true for complex numbers?
Yes, okay I can see why you're getting imaginary solutions
The thing is, something squared is always >= 0, right?
so k^2 >=0
K^2 is always positive

So its automatically true
and then certainly 8k^2 >= 0
yes!
So when you try to solve, you're asking when 8k^2 + 25 = 0 as part of that
and that's.... that doesn't work out
so you get complex values
Does that make sense?
y does the inequality not show its true colours and tell me its critical points?
So can you run me through how you're solving it, and we can try understanding
or are the unreal solutions i got equal to positive and negative infinity?
Ah, no
What's the problem with this?
Axioms are made for a reason
Quill, I don't think this is a conversation about axioms really, this is about a simple inequality :)
i wanna mathematically get a range for k
Oof
okay then imma give up and complete hw
cool
Right Shah, so unfortunately you just have to think about this case
I thought it was about proving how is 8K^2 + 25 is always greater than 0 ;;;
bc sometimes it's just always true

umm i specific at the start i already answered the question itself... anyways bye
.close
Closed by @spring trail
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Please take a minute to participate in [our survey](#changelog message) if you haven't already!
Good luck Shah
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how would i go about finding the linear relation
is it -4
ohh wait
is it
y=-4x+4
wait no
hmmmm
OH
@fierce lagoon I found it
y=4x-4
.close
Closed by @glass gorge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Please take a minute to participate in [our survey](#changelog message) if you haven't already!
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what would be the best method to approach this problem
When you have velocity as a function of time, integrate it with respect of time to obtain the position function as a function of time
That is,
velocity is d?/dt right
because you separate the variables and integrate both sides with respect to t?
calicals
yes
so i can just write this as x(t) = integral and my function
Yep!
okay that makes sense
i would use integration by parts for this right
also, would i assume that x(0) = 0 for this practice problem
Just asking, but why do you think that?
this is practice and in a similar version of this problem they did ibp
ive been doing multiple practice probs for this type of diff eq
to prep for my final next week
y = 4x-4
I think you can, this is a rocket launch anyway. At t=0, it's still on the ground 😄
okay that makes sense, because for the first part we had to find the velocity of the rocket at any time
and we assumed the intitial velocity was zero
that part is sooo much easier lol
yeah i guess obvi x(0)=0 so its inferred then
Ahahahah, yepp
I mean, you can
or would it not really help in this situation
Both are ok imo
I think this is right
I don't think anything is wrong with that, congratulations!
calicals
Use the fact that ln 1 = 0
okay i can try that
if i factor out the -b and put it on the x(t) side, would that still be my u, and then my v would be -gt
Why don't you try to separate the integral
Since it's just gt, you can solve that easily and put it in the LHS
elleyes
lol ive never used that before
Let me help
i appreciate your help im just struggling hard so thank you
$$x(t) = \frac{-gt^2}{2} \int(-b\frac{\ln{(M_0-at)}}{M_0}\ \mathrm{d}t$$
calicals
No problem!
i can also factor out - 1/b so i can just focus on the mess of a fraction i have
and just put it on the left side
Yep
that might make it more manageable because my professor has a video where he does that integration by parts but the -gt was added to this problem
since i separated the gt^2/2, once the IBP is done, can i just add it to the end of the problem
Of course, that's the purpose of evaluating it first 🙂
because this is what the solution to the problem is without -gt
okay, well if thats all i gotta do now thank you! separating that made it so much easier
i appreciate your help.
Yep, good luck!
Closed by @sour peak
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Please take a minute to participate in [our survey](#changelog message) if you haven't already!
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
so
I want to figure out how not to fail trig
since this is a general question I wanted to ask main chat but they were too busy being dumb
I scored 79 and 72 on my last two tests
I am trying so hard but its just so fucking quick
I am taking a half semester class
so its a full course in half the time
its collegiate
im just so fucked rn
I cant fail or retake this class either
I need it as a prereq
Study
how much do u need to pass
Also, not really the channel to ask this in since it's not really a question you need math help on
very badly
oh you mean a score
a C
but a B is better
how much out of 100?
Even though a B is better. You're sitting at a C range so you're doing well enough to pass
There's always Khan Academy
70
khan doesnt really help for this trig
Why not?
its like advanced proof honors type trig
Ah
like circumcenter diagonilization proof whatever
like he actually proves each identity we use in class
its kinda cool but theres so much to learn
@little shuttle Has your question been resolved?
@little shuttle Has your question been resolved?
@little shuttle Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @little shuttle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Please take a minute to participate in [our survey](#changelog message) if you haven't already!
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
After multiple attempts (21), and emailing my teacher I still cannot figure out the answer to the last 2 parts of the question. It is probably simple and I am just tired of math, but I have seemed to have tried everything and havent gotten there. If it is any help, I am pretty sure you have to use Ce^rt on this problem at some step, but I have not figured it out yet. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
You have solved part a right?
The first part, A., is correct
Then you need to solve the differential equation
With the initial balance of 3500 though
I will be in the voice chat to solve this
@stable shale Has your question been resolved?
@stable shale Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @stable shale
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Please take a minute to participate in [our survey](#changelog message) if you haven't already!
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Help
<@&268886789983436800> test
it literally says test on top
Test
but why would it say test
Closed by @dusty steppe
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Please take a minute to participate in [our survey](#changelog message) if you haven't already!
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I understand the FTC1, however what confuses me is with the first area where the bounds of x are [0,2)
hello sir this is occupied
sorry
so for calculating the integral from [0,2)
do I do essentially the integral of 1-2t from 0-x + F(2)?
nvm got it fuck sake
.close
Closed by @main abyss
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Please take a minute to participate in [our survey](#changelog message) if you haven't already!
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Distinction between Variable and Constants,
When I studied Integral Calculus I saw that Constants can be represented by symbolically to. Before that I thought variables are unknowns but constants here can also be unknown.
I'd like to know what exactly is a variable.
Do you have an example of a constant being a variable?
lets say we integrate 2
C is a placeholder variable because you don't know the exact value of that constant
alright could you explain why we refer to it as a constant in integration
Because a constant has a fixed value. When we integrate and add that plus C, it denotes to the person that there's suppose to be some fixed value but we don't know what that exact value is. Because the derivative of constants, is zero
could we say that a constant is a value for any pre-image has a fixed image,
ex f(x)=5?
Yes
maybe im over complicating this
So if you integrate 2, you get f(x) = 2x + C. As I mentioned, C is a placeholder because we don't know what the exact value is
2x+1=3,
x=1
Is x a constant in this case?
C could be 1 and that makes the derivative still 2, because that constant becomes 0
I got that.
When you plug in a number, that becomes a constant. But 2x + 1 = 3, x is a variable
When you say x = 4, and plug in 4, it because a constant at that instance
Here is a google definition between variable and constant
A constant does not change its value over time. A variable, on the other hand, changes its value dependent on the equation.
So if we make the variable a set value at that time, it's a constant
Let's say for that the C(co-domain).
n(C)=1,
That's means it is constant?
That, I'm not too sure about. I haven't dealt much with that kinda of logic. The only difference I know between variable and constant is what I stated above
So, x is a constant at 2x+1=3?
x is still being treated as a variable because it's an unknown value that you are trying to determine
After finding the value does x become a constant?
I would say so because now you declared a value for x, but that occurs when you don't change that value of x
If you say x = 9 and don't change it then it's constant. If you say x = 9, then x = 3, you're changing the value of x meaning it's a variable
Ok, I got it, if the possible values for x is a set and the cardinality of the set is 1 then it is a constant
Uh.... sure
Thanks man
I've had this question for months but never asked anyone because I thought it was trivial.
.close
Closed by @raw marten
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Please take a minute to participate in [our survey](#changelog message) if you haven't already!
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i have a quick question
what is the slope of a slide
fuck
wait
worded that wrong
how do i find the slope of a right triangle
this is the q
What's the equation for slope?
y=mx+b
of slope is rise/run
Yep
Closed by @eternal dome
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Please take a minute to participate in [our survey](#changelog message) if you haven't already!
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Wouldn't it be around 7 / 8.5?
I drew a diagram and it seems like pythagorean theorem is involved to find the slope
unless I'm horribly mistaken
although that is still greater than 0.55 so I suppose it doesn't matter
I interpreted "how long" to mean the horizontal distance, but if it was referring to the hypotenuse, then you'd be right
In fact, you're probably right
yeahh because it's a slide
anyway that's fine as it doesn't affect the result
but you should probably keep that in mind for future problems @eternal dome
thanks
.close
Closed by @uneven palm
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Please take a minute to participate in [our survey](#changelog message) if you haven't already!
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
<@&286206848099549185>
!15min
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
Please read the rules and be a good person please
i was in another help thing first
and then i deleted the first question i had to send the second
but i have been in the help thing for a sum of 30 mins
<@&286206848099549185>
What's up
Don't ping helpers before 15 minutes passed after you posted your question, and only ping once
ok
well i have been sitting here for too long
and i just want to learn
teacher is asleep and cant find anything on google
What's the part of the question you don't understand? It's a pretty long question
idk what the diff of inside and outside diameter is
You pool is something like this
No there's an hole in it
It's a pool, so...
yeah i get that
r would be the outside radius
It's like a pizza but it's all eaten and all that's left is the crust but you put the pieces back in a circle
yeah ok
The radius up to the outside of the wall is the outside radius, the radius up to the inside of the wall is the inside radius
Do you get what I mean or I need to explain it better?
no i get it
Ok
Let's divide the first request in two parts, let's find the volume of the walls first, then the volume of the floor ok?
ok
I've never used the imperial system because I'm not from the US (and because it sucks) so I have no idea how to convert from cubic feet to cubic yards btw, but I can help you with the rest
im not from the us either
I mean, wherever you use the imperial system
idk
The volume of a cylinder is:
$$V=\pi r^2\times h$$
3 feet in a yard. Cubic feet to cubic yards follows from there
Andrea276
Ok got it
I'd use this formula to find the volume with the bigger radius (basically of the whole cylinder if it was full) and the I'd subtract the volume of the smaller circle (which is basically the hole in the cylinder).
Do you get what I'm trying to say here?
no
We have something like in the figure above; to find its volume I think it's better to:
-first find the volume of the cylinder as if it didn't have a hole in it (diameter=13ft);
-then subtract the volume of the hole to remain with just the volume of the walls of the cylinder (diameter=12ft).
oh ok
So try to find the two radiuses
so the radiuses are 6.5 and 6
Correct
and then the volume for the outer is 199
Wait, what's the height you used?
That's the inside height, as the problem says, but you also have a 0.5ft floor
so its 2 instead of 1.5
To find the total height you need to sum the inside height (the height from the top of the pool to the floor) with the height of the floor
Yes
Result:
226.19467105847
subtract both numbers
Subtract the outer from the inner volume
.
Since the inner volume it's just the volume of the hole, you want to subtract it from the volume of the whole cylinder
Yes
That's the volume of the walls of the pool
Now you need to add the volume of the floor to find the total volume right?
.
How thick is the floor?
Just the floor of the pool, read the problem
That's the height of the whole pool
Yes, don't convert to another unit
oh ok
0.5ft
so 1/2 ft
Yes
ye
You can think of the floor as an almost flat cylinder, with height 0.5 and radius [?]
radius of 12
Yes
It's inside the walls, not below them
.
But you have to use the height of the floor, that's what we're trying to find
You found the volume of the walls
yes
Now you're trying to find the volume of the floor, which is basically a disk right?
oh ok
The thickness of the disk, or height, is 0.5ft
And it's radius is 12ft, since it's inside the walls
so V=pi 12^2 x 0.5
i got 226
Sorry, the radius is half the diameter
So it's not 12 but 6
I forgot to divide by 2 the diameter
It's the same radius as before
so 56
Result:
56.548667764616
how do i do that
First calculate the volume in feet
i got 95.5
$$3ft=1yard$$
Now, since it asks for cubic yards, and you have your volume in cubic feet, you can raise everything to the third power to get from ft to ft³:
$$(3ft)^3=(1yard)^3$$
$$27ft^3=1yard^3$$
So:
$$1ft^3=\frac{1}{27}yard^3$$
To convert from cubic feet to cubic yards you can just divide your answer by 27
Andrea276
wow
That took a long time lol
yeah i could tell
But it looks good, so it's worth it
Yes
No, that's just the unit
i can just do 95.5
yard³
ok
Yw
No, every helpers it's a volunteer
Lol thanks
It's great to help people when you can
Do you need help with the second part of the problem too?
so basically what it is saying is that the water is filled 3/4 to the pool
and it wants to know what 4/4 is
No, it's filled up to 1/4ft, or 0.25ft, from the top of the pool
It's in feet, it's not a fraction of the height of the pool
Yes
so it needs 6x more water
