#serious-discussion
1 messages · Page 555 of 1
i heard of one case where academia discovered something and it was later revealed that the NSA already knew about this x years
but i dont think this is common
I mean I can think of differential cryptanalysis (from the post) and RSA
there are a lot of good researchers nowadays and most of them dont work for the NSA (or are even american)
more so in recent years, as well
the US had outsized influence in the decades after WW2 but that has increasingly not been the case as european centers of excellence recovered from the depredations of the war
also south asia
as well as various centers outside of both europe and america became more respectable
(bloody fingers not behaving)
Also Loch are you our resident ECC expert?... if so is this true:
The mathematics behind Elliptic Curves are not well understood
We have no proof that elliptic curves are inherently strong
there are certainly unanswered questions related to elliptic curves, answers t owhich might potentially give someone who knew them a competitive advantage in this area
elliptic curves are still being researched
but i think it's unlikely that the NSA is sitting on any such gems
we dont have a proof that anything is inherently strong
also ECC is rather wide
there is the classical approach via the group law and the more modern approach via isogenies
the latter isnt understood very well at all, its only being researched for 20 years
this is one reason why NIST decided against it
(there is no other post-quantum protocol based on elliptic curves)
Don't we have proof some are strong by the whole NP, NP-Hard stuff? Or I guess thats a bad indicator for strength.
with most things we use its no one knows
complexity theory isnt well understood either i think
there's plenty of unanswered questions there too, yeah
hey loch what was that massive book you recommended for cryptography again?
linear algebra
good question, its really just a vibe
"we tried for 20 years and didnt find any major flaw so its probably fine"
yeah, but it's still well understood
i would also say linear algebra is well understood fwiw
it is unlikel that someone will pop up and announce some result that undermines our broad understanding of linear algebra
if its a math "book", probably https://www.math.auckland.ac.nz/~sgal018/crypto-book/main.pdf
yee that was it tyty
ye also there arent many articles published on linear algebra or euclidean geometry
there are likely more articles on the history of euclidean geometry published in any year than there are on euclidean geometry itself
oh sorry by linear algebra i meant the finite dimensional case
there are definitely things to research in infinite-dimensional linear algebra
elliptic curves are hard to understand
they're so wobbly
They're donuts
so strong so brave
for now 😭
"we tried for 20 years to break this but couldnt"
also you have to mention that NP-hardness doesnt suffice for the needs of cryptography
you need problems that are hard on average
and with many NP-hard problems you dont have this
im not sure if average complexity is even researched in complexity theory
but in cryptography its mostly "we assume this problem is hard because we tried to break it for a while and couldnt"
sometimes there are more mathematical reasons to suspect something is generally hard
this reminds me of the ongoing effort to find efficient multiplication algorithms
wasn't karatsuba's proved to be the most efficient?
no, it's been proven not the most efficient
schoenhage-strassen is more efficient in the limit case and practically for cases involving more than 10,000 digits
huh
and Harvey-van der Hoeven is categorically faster, being flat out O(n log n)
but that's only from last year, and people are still poking at it
karatsuba remains practically faster for digit counts between about 1000 and between 10,000 and 40,000 depending on hardware
gmp has seven (iirc) different algorithms it selects from depending on the size of the problem, including some that are specifically for "unbalanced" multiplications
@reef carbon moving here. i disagree that i in any way yelled at them
that you consider all PDFs not made by yourself to be infested with viruses by default
Obviously not. e.g. co-workers, friends, etc.
you told them off for daring to upload their problem in the form of a PDF and not an image.
this reads as telling them off to me.
but i guess this is grounds for you to publicly accuse me of defamation of character.
could be grounds for you to publicly accuse me of defamation of character.
"defamation of character" is also an exaggeration. i haven't said anything about you
i said you HAD THE ABILITY TO present this as such.
Calm down.
i am calm.
what's the point in presenting hypotheticals? i have the ability to type a lot of things.
the point is that you demonstrated that something i said about you is false
which is like, Bad or something, or so i would think
@reef carbon @hollow sundial this convo seems like it belongs in a dm
i have nothing more to say anyway
I sometimes read internet comments as meaner as it's meant to. Just because I'm in a bad head space.
i'm perfectly content with being accused of being too harsh or yelling at people. more often than not, other people are right. just not in this case.
alright i'm done too
Just assume the best intention from the other party.
thanks for chiming in
for future reference, pls raise personal concerns in dms
differential equations
what's the closest university to you that has a good math program? they usually give templates
they do?
like do i just ask them to give me their template on maths(pure)
coool thanks
General syllabi for courses offered through the Department of Mathematics at UC Davis.
but yea i think real analysis and abstract algebra would be first after differential equations. some universities have an "intro to proof" class since it's such a big leap from calculations to proofs.
hmmm do they not start with proofs?
i think real analysis and abstract algebra just assume you understand proofs very well already
coming up with contrapositives, logical equivalents, proof by contradiction, etc.
that's probably why most people don't do well in their first pass of real anal
at least from what I've heard
yea i went through the class and it was good for me
also makes people get a flavor for the rest of math and see if they want to change majors before wasting too much time
https://math.mit.edu/classes/proofsiap/ seems pretty good
the first half is all i learned since i was on the quarter system
proofs and basic real anal should be introduced in highschool tbh so that the can get a taste of it earlier
this sounds like a fun and interesting course
reposting bc nobody gave a shit
Internet troll level
lmao
fun fact here
huh
that number feels low to me
although ig unique solutions is a pretty big limiter
I mean
20 digits, 9^{81} is 77 digits
And then keep in mind that we're putting a bunch of heavy simultaneous constraints
yeah
hmmm
put that way it sounds much more reasonable
i don't think i fully get how 'heavy' the constraints are
Well within one 3x3 box
If you could have any sequence of numbers
9^9
And then instead it's 9!
0.09% of possibilities
Let's do a more precise estimate
If each 3x3 box can contain any permutation of 1-9
Number of digits is 9*log_{10}(9!)
Which is about 50
But now we're requiring on top of that that every row and column is a permutation of 1-9
So if the total number of sudoku puzzles is the square root of the number of "sudoku puzzles but we're not requiring anything on rows/columns", that goes down to 25 digits
This is 22
So this feels aight to me
(I didn't have any intuition for coming up with the square root number I just noticed it's approximately double the number of digits)
@sonic steeple -3
Opps can't math
I meant -2
whos good at word problems
do you need help on some problems?
They opened their own channel
yess
Real anal.

can you write the set of complex numbers in this way?
R[i]/(i^2+1)
For anyone who has done the Australian Maths Competition what did you think of it
For reference I have done but want to here other peoples opinions on it
Yes usually that's the definition
nice
right, R[i]/(i^2+1) is adjoining the roots of i^2+1 to R
the two roots, say i and -i, are algebraically indistinguishable
so you get a symmetry which is complex conjugation
Anal.
we all love anal
anak
suly


Yes!
smh i still need to read complex anal
You what?
As in?
Could've worked that better
real or complex
and i dont think i have the time to also do anal since i am not done with entrance exams yet
😭
i would love to do it a lil later if u dont mind
r u from india?
yes
o yea definitely
so jee?

but im giving it just in case
rip
indian institute of science education and research
sounds fancy
so like ivy league in us?
better than iit?
its ivy league for people who want to do pure science
ohh ok
usually there isnt a direct comparison
but for science yes
i see
The math server certainly is something.
Math server is fun

hehehe
hello ryc
@deep mango would you say fun anal is more fun than intro anal?
Yes

yee
it's like
nothing is new but you gotta painstakingly prove every seemingly obvious fact
so it's no fun and all the pain
I thought compactness was fun
That was about it
Seeing why Taylor's theorem is true was fun
compactness is only fun outside of R^n
sequential compactness is the way to go
being able to pass between sequential and open sets notions for things is good
although proving sequential compactness and the topological definition are equivalent is a bitch
sequential compactness is every sequence got a convergent sub sequence?
this proves one direction
just looking at that i want to vomit on my munkres book
no wait that's a 3rd kind of compactness
topology is too ball heavy for me
My balls… are heavy….
Wewcome
I can help with that
drain the ||cubes||
i mean it just feels good to do hard things in anal
if you know what i mean
I, too, am a masochist

how do you pronounce wew
in my head i think
wheeeu where the final u is the u in like stupid
like woo?
something like view
Thats the sort of argument I think is cool
Yeah
i agree that argument is cool. it's just a complete bitch
Proof that [0, 1] is compact by splitting into two intervals and picking the one which requires infinitely many open sets on it, and repeating this until one interval is small enough to fit in one of the open sets
Is cool
It's like finding a path down an infinite binary tree
Final Exam: Prove [0, 1] is compact
Ryc: Merge sort :lel:
completeness bitch
FTFMe
Though you might not discuss that in intro analysis
i definitely didn't learn that
I think I learned it in my graduate analysis class
@hollow sundial its compact because its using brackets and none of the arguments are infinity
(0,1) is homeo to R, does that still seem compact?
Compactness is formally defined as a space that includes brackets when you write it down, and also no infinity symbol
here i thought it meant every open cover has a finite subcover
Only a fool
Every space is compact as infinite objects don't exist
Compact is defined to be closed and bounded.
@woeful oxide like electrical circuits?
yeah
theres a good amount of resources for the basics online, or at libraries
I prefer to define compactness to mean sequetially compact
Pls help me I can't find any
I want someone to help me with physics really
I wanna learn and I'm enthuasiatic
My exams are really soon after 3 days
I have to study electricity and magnetisim
And I have to solve circuit problems
proof that [0,1] is compact: bounded closed interval
^
ok, so (0, 1) is homeo to R but [0, 1] isn't?
yeah
which part of that is so 
[-1,2] \ [1,2] \ [-1,0] is compact 😎
when I imagine (0,1) being homeomorphic to R I imagine (0, 1) being stretched to cover R
I don't intuitively get why we can't do that for [0, 1] as well
it has to do this continuously
Where are the boundary points mapped to when we do this?
so a continuous map is one where the preimage of open sets is open
but preimage of (a,\infty) is ???
Right, but infinity isn't a real number. So as a map to R this isn't even well-defined.
||not open in subspace topology||
R unioned with infinity (the set of extended real numbers) is compact
oo
so if you stretch out the boundaries of [0, 1] to infinity, then it actually stays compact
:)

There are compact spaces that contain R. For instance, the circle.
ignore me lol i had a Moment
Anyway, perhaps the way to think of compact is "things that behave like closed intervals and points"
terrence tao has a good explanation
how tf do you picture every cover got a finite subcover
hm?
where
Imagine you have infinitely many blankets and then you remove some
You want to cover your space with blankets that you put on top of it. But, however you do that, you want to then be able to remove all but a finite number without removing all the blankets.
Like, literally think of something in R^2 covered in blankets if you want to visualize it
it also might help to see compactness used in a proof. the simplest example I can think of is proving a function that's continuous on a compact set is uniformly continuous. Roughly you just imagine at every point it's continuous you can place an open ball centered there, then this forms your proverbial infinite open cover. But since it's compact, it actually has a finite subcover, and so you then go on to end up proving it's uniformly continuous.
i like that theorem a lot its so cute
I did see compactness in proofs
it really captures the "finiteness" that comes from compactness that my prof likes to talk about
I think I just need to get used to it?
Here is another way to think about it but it is not using open covers and it only works in metric spaces (for example it works in R)
Like if you take a finite set and consider a sequence on it, at least one point must be obtained infinitely often by the sequence
Now if you replace the finite set by an infinite set, this is clearly not true anymore
Because you can have a sequence that visits each point once
But with compact sets, you can get the next best thing
For any sequence, you can find a point that is approximated arbitrarily closely by the sequence infinitely often
the idea of 'smol wrt topo' is already captured in the finite subcover part of being compact
ah yea dats true
ig i mean more like
another example of the finiteness feelings
or maybe like in context/use
this theorem is like smolness in action
anytime u extract finite subcover
as per above, compact expresses being 'smol' wrt a topology by letting u extract finite subcovers
Indeed
:0
Im sorry what
and [0, 1] certainly isnt homeomorphic since like
what do you map the endpoints to

I thought u could map them somewhere in between, but Ig that won't be a homeomorphism then
That would not be continuous
There isnt even a continuous surjection from [0, 1] to R
hmmm
simply because of the endpoints yeah?
continuous functions map compact sets to compact sets; [0,1] is compact but R is not. truth hurts
Hmm what are these r's that appeared
😭
letters

Ah yes, the floor is made of floor
Im asking what are they supposed to represent since i didn't have them in the collection of variables i defined
Is this sage or sympy?
Sage
Well it could be some constants/real numbers
On a side note, setting up sage was an absolute pain
Hmm
They are real-valued parameters.
https://ask.sagemath.org/question/52904/what-does-r-in-an-answer-mean/
After I ran the following I got a valid image but what do the r's stand for in the solve part? They don't seem to have a value but I didn't get an error. var('x y') show(plot3d(x^2 + y^2, (x,-2,2), (y,-2,2))) [image] solve(x^2 + y^2==0,[x,y]) [[x == r1, y == Ir1], [x == r2, y == -Ir2]]
Guys
But since i asked sage to solve the equation, why didn't it just tell me what those real numbers are instead of just telling me they're some real numbers without specifying
They are families of solutions, do you know what this means?
Yeah i know what are families
I get what it meant
But is there a way to let sage like compute one of the answers from that family of solutions
Like just for the fun of it
Or like express the solution in terms of x,y,z,a,b,c
There's probably some substitution you can force it, I'm not sure
I see
Anyways thanks haha
: )
Tried to google for an answer just now but didn't find this one for some reason
Or i was just being blind lol
GUYS./
I need a REALLY good Algebra / Trig book.
One of my BIGGEST Obstacles to self-studying calc are the holes in my algebra.
Is there a book that is the Algebra/ Trig equivalent to Spivak's calculus?
do it!
There is serg lang's basic mathmatics, which is supposed to cover high school math
up to pre calc
i tried reading it once when i was in your situation
no
khan academy is pretty good I think
matrices and determinants are precalc..?
first time I got taught that was linear algebra
huh
that sounds like a typical first semester linear algebra class
that's so strange
you don't need matrices for anything until linear algebra, why teach it before calculus
tf
your high school is advanced LOL
a good deal of high schools don't even teach calc ii
yeah I don't think there's any reason to teach them in a precalc class
trig identities and stuff are important though
I also learned matrices early too in school just like how to multiply them etc did help when I went to linear algebra and manipulating them was nothing new
ive just read about length contraction and im curious
does it mean if we had the millennium falcon and flew at 1.5 times light speed, great distances in space would seem to only be 2/3 what measures made on earth say they are?
Can’t travel at 1.5 times light speed
At least not with matter
hypothetically
There is no hypothetically
Also things would appear 2/3 smaller before you get to 1x the speed of light
well millennium falcon also doesnt physically exist but thats not the point
It is the point
whys that
Cause you’re trying to apply a theory to something it doesn’t cover
We can’t reasonably answer your question because it’s against the laws of physics
imagine a little
well because length is equal to proper length divided by gamma and gamma is always bigger than 1 you only need gamma to be 3/2 then your length is 2/3 the proper length
But then what are you learning 
I can give you a bullshit answer of you want
But like
It brings absolutely nothing
i see
It’s like asking: if I apply the perfect gas law to a viscous fluid with heat transfer what do I get
The model just doesn’t apply
that says nothing to me idk chemistry
If I let electricity flow in a non conductor
What happens
It’s a non question
Okay that’s a pretty shit example tbf
But I hope you get my point
It wasn’t a stupid question don’t get me wrong, just founded on a misunderstanding but the idea of the question was fine
No see this is where I disagree
“If time stops how do I apply the law of physics to find the speed of a moving car” is in analogy to your question
It doesn’t make sense
Why am I so shit at generating one good analogy 😂
moving a bit of information 1400 kilometers instantly also doesnt make sense and they did that in 2017
The point is if you want to find out what happens in a scenario that physics doesn’t currently follow, don’t try to just extend an already existing theory naively
The only way you’ll be able to deal with those scenarios is by building a new theory that refutes the old one
And you sure as hell aren’t going to do that on a discord server
something I wondered is if the universe could have 2 separate electromagnetic fields with two different speeds of light, then what would happen? What if there was an infinite number each with different speeds and we experience the average? I read a QED book by Feynman once and talked to my professor about it and he said photons don’t really have a speed. It’s more like an interval that a photon is detected from one place to another. This interval can actually take any magnitude, but it averages to the speed of light. Idk how accurate that is but that’s what I understand @calm sigil
I think it is something we have to measure we don’t have a theoretical way to predict what the speed of light will be
take that with a grain of salt lmao

its already different through different mediums; I would assume a similar situation is the only way that would be able to make sense
symmetric infinity around an identity, or something
idk what that is
and neither does google lol
do you think we could say that 0 is the average of all reals? if the bounds are + and - infinity? or also we could say its something similar to an average
There’s certainly a sense in which you can say it
Take a the limit of the averages of compact disks as the radius increases
But the question always remains: is your definition worthwhile
In this case, saying 0 is the average of real numbers in this sense has a few caveats
For example: why pick a limit of compact disks of increasing size? Why not just compact sets?
But now you run into a problem because the average becomes ill defined, ie the limit doesn’t exist
Thought experiments and questions are great, but often times they are not questions that are answered by the current theory and unless you build your own framework for the things you say to start making sense and be of use, the questions are best left as an after thought
That doesn’t mean you should stop asking them though
its physics so you'd just wait for the experiments, I suppose
Yeah in physics you have the added luxury of experiments
if you translate the reals over by some amount c though you get the set of reals again, but the average has moved to c
so it's reasonable to say that the reals do not have any middle point
Wdym
I keep asking this but I wonder if anyone has any idea, it's kinda complex and more discussion worthy but
From what I've seen
Every (complex) function that satisfies y'' = L(y), and by integration and differentiation, y'^2 = L(y) where L is a complex polynomial [regardless of initial conditions] is perioidic
either singularly periodic or doubly periodic
Is there any good explanation for this
Along with that, many often have addition theorems
The exponential, elliptic, and tangential functions are all examples
this sounds like harmonic analysis
idk how that would help
unless you use reimann cauchy which is even worse
I guess there are some edge cases to consider as exceptions, idk if they can be pushed into worse examples
like when L(y) is a constant we have solutions that are quadratics which aren't periodic (well, assuming I have the right idea of periodic as you do)
I just mean that the real numbers are invariant under translation, so I'm not sure if the notion of an average of all real numbers is useful
fair enough, didn't think of that
if it's a nonconstant polynomial
does this disrupt any solution because if you have a solution, you can always add a quadratic with a bit of scaling to it to get another solution I think
or maybe not idk
it's weird
when you say periodic what do you mean specifically, there's some line in the complex plane where it's periodic I assume
specially when you consider elliptic curves and how their group law's addition correlates in some way with their function
yeah
I think maybe it's worth fleshing out in a bit more detail so we have our hands on it, let's assume $L(y)$ is some fixed polynomial, then $y''=L(y)$ can be turned into $\dv{y'}{y}y'=L(y)$ and so $$\int y' dy' = \int L(y) dy$$ and then a bit of manipulation makes it for some other arbitrary polynomial $M$, $$y'^2 = M(y)$$ and so we can now end up looking at this $$\int \frac{dy}{\sqrt{M(y)}} = t+C$$
Merosity
I don't know how useful that is but trying to flesh this out a bit to make sure I'm actually on the same page as you because I've not fully realized my psychic abilities
@storm sage that's also where the identity aspect might be useful though
rational function.
it's an elliptic integral
but only for degree 3 and 4
I think there may be an addition theorem to prove from this
if I were you I would attempt to go through the proof for arctan, or any other one, then try to see if you can mimic/alter it to work for this general case
here's why it's difficult
you might have to think in terms of defining a kind of function and inverse etc to get the job done
M is the result of integrating a polynomial
First you need to consider a branch cut for x^1/2
if its degree is less than 1 that's just a constant
<2
SO here's the issues
- Branch cut for the square root
- Branch cuts for the inverse function
@static loom I don't really know how to work with branch cuts well
Lets assume M(x) is inseperable
well sounds like you have a motivation to learn now
then 1/M(x) has n many differing simple poles
how can we connect these poles with a branch cut for sqrt(x) in a way we can make a contour around them
Working with that seems messy as FUCK
well the most obvious thing I see without thinking too hard in terms of reverse engineering a solution is since the integral ended up being t, we can think of it as s+t = (s+t) with the first being two integrals, one going to s, one going to t, then the right integral is to s+t
idk where the t comes from
I just derived it earlier
$y'^2=M(y)$ gets us $\dv{y}{t} = \sqrt{M(y)}$ so we end up just in the simplest case at $$\int_0^t \frac{dy}{\sqrt{M(y)}} = \int_0^t ds$$ $$\int_0^t \frac{dy}{\sqrt{M(y)}} = t$$
Merosity
oh yea, nvm
$$\int_0^t \frac{dy}{\sqrt{M(y)}}+\int_0^s \frac{dy}{\sqrt{M(y)}} = \int_0^{s+t} \frac{dy}{\sqrt{M(y)}}$$
Merosity
of course if you're doing a contour integral in the complex plane you need to consider more but
Cant intersect a branch cut, must wind around the contours, etc.
sqrt(x) also needs to slice the domain
a polynomial only has finitely many roots so this is true between any two real roots along the real line
so long as it's not got a pole at 0
but I'm just saying start small and work up
I tried starting with a quadratic.
like I said earlier here
Here's what I came up with
y'^2 = y^2 + by + c, y(A) = B
well M(y) = (y - u)(y- v)
so we know our two poles are u and v
our branch cut either traces a line between u and v as points, or traces a line outward to infinity and back
so lets assume the branch cut connects them
Actually let me draw it out
@static loom Yeah
Essentially, if the y lies in the half of the plane with (0,0), we just integrate infinetismally close to the midpoint of the poles and then back to y
otherwise, we integrate infinitesimally close to the midpoint and then AROUND one of the poles to infinitesimally close to the other side and then to the y
but idk how we'd do this with like, 3 poles, or four
You were in my situation? Graduated and trying to self-study calc? So this can be done. WOOT.
If you took the US equivalent of algebra 2, pre-calculus is not necessary.
Yes. I self studied much of my math, throughout my degree. I am a slow learner and so I wanted to get a headstart during the breaks. I self studied real analysis and abstract algebra as well
It's not as efficient as taking classes, usually

Tbh I learn better from books than lectures myself
thats exactly what i look like, but without the huge smile
I would disagree with this in the sense that book content is often more advanced than lecture content
I think it depends on my lecturer and it depends on the person. It's depending on many variables!
Yeah in general it can vary widely
Yes books are a huge time commitment for me since it covers way more than a class
Self study the whole of undergrad like moth 
Honestly yes
If you sleep 4 hours a day and delete social media, ‘tis plausible
Like, i read terrance tao's analysis volume 1 for example, it took a loong time. Did most of the problems in it. When i came back the next year the real analysis classes were really easy tho
Still seems plausible tbh with a reasonable schedule
Moth somehow knows / knew algebraic geometry in hs
Introductory real analysis or graduate?
the one inbetween those
Moth is still a giga outlier in any case
senior undergrad
But self-studying most of an undergrad course in math seems doable enough I think
You can work up to algebraic geometry in a few months of specialized work Linear Algebra and Calculus (with proofs) ——> Abstract Algebra —-> Algebraic Geometry
i took a class on measure theory in grad...i havnt gone past that though. It was really tough even with all the self study!
I have to get around to learning measure theory
You probably could get to basic alg geo like that yeah
But Moth knows all the other stuff proper
Oh
Anyway like i said, i learn at a very slow pace. I don't understand why people think "it takes X amount of time to learn" can be some sort of objective statement
Yeah moth is an absolute beast
Yeah learning pace varies widely too
Advanced alg geo in hs is OP
who is moth? are they are on this discord?
A moderator who has become a reserve moderator
Could still ban our asses

This is what moth looks like btw
btw on the topic of "learning better by reading books". That's been true of some of my classes. One of them was literally just reading from the book. So I didn't see the point in classes because it's just the same except not allowing me to go at my own pace. The only thing i got out of it was being able to ask questions when i was stuck.
It made me seriously question why I was even at uni
To get a piece of paper 
Would prefer to just use crayon and write "legit math degree" on it

The class was functional analysis. We read about half of Kreyszig. Good book. Also found it strange that the proffessor would recommend us to read super advanced books on PDE's every other week haha
Taylor's book on PDEs 


actually this is what moth looks like
What does the term 'unbroken string' mean?
context?
oh wait i think i figured it out after being confused for half an hour
i think it means a sequence with every term being nonzero
this was from a proof in a paper i was reading
hey whats ur guys opinion on the 4th dimension
ratio
nth dimension is better
it's weird. a lot of weird stuff happens topologically
In mathematics, a 4-manifold is a 4-dimensional topological manifold. A smooth 4-manifold is a 4-manifold with a smooth structure. In dimension four, in marked contrast with lower dimensions, topological and smooth manifolds are quite different. There exist some topological 4-manifolds which admit no smooth structure, and even if there exists a...
for just some of the strange things that happen in four dimensions
thats rude
when u rlly think about it you could literally move in a new direction
i will be informing the admins of the server plus my mother
like turn in a new angle allowing you to move through a new unit of measurement along the w axis
guys im onto something really
ok
now think of n dimensions
i tried
you can move in n-3 extra directions
yeah
so basically yeah
ok so is God 4D or 5D
we cant see god because we can only see 3D and below
0D
whats ur opinion on the grandfather paradox
dude why did u come to this channel to belittle my beliefs again
can i time travel back to when my parents get together asking for a friend
this is literally targeted harassment
how are you suggesting time travel works
damn L
oh so bullying is what we do here
honestly extremely disappointed, i wanted to join a community with like minded individuals
but im greeted with this disgusting behavior
wait no
im ending my life. GGWP
Evil, this is a math discord, not a religion one, come back

Sit your bottom down
Please stop bait trolling
sorry
Not you
Let me tell you a story evil
oh
hello my son is dead what did u do to him
bruh
One time, a man met a lion in the forest
my son just wanted to know if god was 4D or 5D
Uh I mean jungle
and u killed him.
i almost got to have a fun discussion about 4 manifolds, but the highschoolers came in. oh, if only there was a place to do so!
your "beliefs" show that you have no understanding of what a dimension is
@neat lintel #❓how-to-get-help
okay guys please back to the 4th dimension like i am really curious
the man asked the lion "Just how did you become the king of the jungle? "
ratio
You know what the lion said?
what does the fox say
never ask what the fox says
@ancient flame i understand interpreting tone may be difficult through text
oh fuck its not like my mom to ratio people i broke character
LOL
tteppa is my dad
Tterra are you looking for adoption
i dislike and do not want children
thats rude btw bro
fuck kids
This is heartbreaking
we can all understand dimensions no need to get personal
I don't particularly care
I hate them
kids are nice
(1, 2, 3)
3d
(1,2,3,4)
4d
kids are devils
I just don't want them because I'm a teenager, I wanna live my own life first
very spooky
thanks we all know this bro we are in a maths server
like
..
we know this pls
pls bro
wew kinda true doe
wew kinda cute doe
then what is with the schizo-posting earli-AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
melody I think you're looking for more of a physics discussion than a maths one
LOL
you think so?
ggs roasted
gg leaving the server
thanks guys
Yeah, maths people aren't too interested in 4D representing time or whatever, as far as I know
i'd say the question still fits here, but it's just being shat up by highschoolers trying to troll and what not
hey im not a high schooler anymore
i bet u guys would instantly be better at valorant than melody
I see, I see
same
It could start a discussion about manifolds yeah, let's do that
this is kinda cool
#52 - Most Discussed (Today) - South Korea
#1 - Most Discussed (Today) - Education - South Korea
#2 - Most Discussed (This Week) - Education - South Korea
#14 - Most Discussed (This Month) - Education - South Korea
#68 - Most Viewed (Today) - Education - Canada
#66 - Most Viewed (Today) - Education - Ireland
#53 - M...
mods ban
LOL
Sick sick sick
i've already lost interest in talking about manifolds, i don't need highschooler #1 and highschooler #2 and first year #1 spamming about video games and god whilst doing so
I just put my shirt on backwards
whats a manifold
opposite of a womanifold
still not helping
it's a thing that locally looks like another familiar thing
isn't it like the generalization of a surface in n dimensions
do you guys wanna hear a good math pickup line
yeah
elaborate
consider the 3d translation vectors representing the 3 usual "directions" $$\mqty(1\0\0), \mqty(0\1\0), \mqty(0\0\1)$$
if you move up to $n>3$ dimensions you get equivalents of those translations plus $n-3$ more: $$\mqty(0\0\0\1\0\ \vdots),\mqty(0\0\0\0\1\ \vdots)\cdots$$
why am i tryna understand this stuff
ally 🌈
sure melody
@honest veldt i know you like adding numbers… could you please add yours to my contacts?
YO
Smooth. As. Butter
Let's move
oaDSKaskasD
u nerds are welcome
WOMEN! DATE ME!!!!!!
LOL
i appreciate the response, no idea what u said tho unfortunately
@sleek wing no more countries?
Can vouch, wew is kinda attractive
jk I would never actually say this in real life
wew is so hot
I would say "MEN! DATE ME!!!!!!!!!"
I think tterra gave up
meow
woof
ive been in this server for at least 10 minutes and i dont have the very cool ppl role
is this a bug?
Kinda weird behavior
bc L
Suspicious activity
positively freakazoidal
a better maths related pickup line is the abstract of a paper you have written
if they don't walk away then you probably have a chance
wew you have a girlfriend
all good bro no ones paying attention
don't SPOIL IT ally
so hot
lmao
ally ure so hot
the child quips
tell me more
how old are you
i am 21
thats personal
I'm 16
ggs
LMAOO
*personnel
DISCORD MOD LOOKIN ASS @neat lintel

children in chat
@ancient flame
???
Owned
please no memes in general thank u
wew i like the pfp
thanks I made it myself
aite ggs
imagine being
the pure intensity of that gaze is unparalleled
I wanted to use my dream one but it took too long so I gave up
why would i get real when i could get p-adic
pear-addic
complex analysis more like fake analysis lmao gottem 🤣 🤣 🤣
😂 🤣 😂 🤣 😂 🤣 😂 🤣
feeling like making a joke album EP under the name DJ Qwertyuiop
Extending the common qwerty, I enjoy
call yourself matrix man
QWERT YUIOP
Very intellectually stimulating
yes
qwertz
nether qwertz
azerty master race
sure, hop on the maths discord serv- oh wait
I used to spend all day on minecraft a few years ago, I was kinda cracked
Oh....... White name.....

I had a 11 bedwaurz winstreak
I was reached like level 122 in bedwars then sold my account
i swear they just archived the channel
Is it actually gone?
Bedwars is kinda zased
no it is actually #help-37
I used to play with parties all day but eventually I realized my error
Playing only 3s or 4s with randoms is so much better, I somehow maintained a good win rate like that
Let them defend, go do yo thang
I had a squad of lads
let's game.
I am not playing hypixel
at 8 past midnight
Yeah no I don't even know how to run minecraft on this arch crap, I might have to boot up my old pc that only works when put on its side
I cannot play at this time
they call me the tsar bomba
there's literally a version of Minecraft java for linux
yeah "bitch edition version 6.9" 🤣
you don't even need to wine or anything
red or white
white wine is called milk, get real
Rose
Red gentleman
kingly take as is to be expected
You can't make white wine, because white grapes don't exist
southener
I drink mango juice box
if you're not dealing crack by 16 you're a southener
if you're not making your way up the ranks of the underground mob at 15, you're not going places in life
wew you weren't dealing crack at 16 you were doing matrix multiplication
same thing
underground mob call that cave spider spawner
Mango
dealing crack is not the same as doing crack
Undeground mob call that kanga gang
call me the mob grinder cause I spawn some shit
have you tried that hypixel skyblock wew
Go play monster hunter, nerd.
jesse did you remember to light up the inside of the mob spawner
@delicate mulch
Hey Strad, Shinzo Abe asked me to send you this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DhtEKCqmvU4&ab_channel=DavieAK
Morbtitles for every morbhead's favorite song. It's morbin' time!
I tried it recently actually, freedom unite I think
Kinda moving
u have been summoned
Tox. I need to speak with you.
freedom unite? Bro, Rise came out and its the bees knees.
My man, I have nothing but this lowly psp to make do with, I've gotta go
Well, actually a psvita but I emulate psp on it cause it's better
off the meds is such a good band
Yeah, ngl. . .
Sick. Hideo Kojima asked me to send you this: https://youtu.be/_FOESVW8ndU
Listen to Morbius (Music From The Motion Picture)
Dir: Martin Scorsese
Producer: Martin Scorsese
Production Company: Martin Scorsese
Director of Photography: Martin Scorsese
Production Designer: Martin Scorsese
Music video by Eminem performing Morbius. © 2022 Aftermath Records
If one good thing came out of Morbius? It's me finding this band.
PFHAHAHAHAHAHAH
You know, it's honestly funny. . . .Taking out Shinzo Abe sounds like something a.) Kojima would do b.) do in one of his games if he ever thought of it.
I can't believe this accusation is a real thing lmao, what's happening
Well, it's honestly been a thing for awhile.
I don't remember where this company got their data from : But basically, this firm in the UKs job is to raise engagement for their clients by any means necessary.
Which means, you guessed it : Fake news and propaganda.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1545857338929827840 Also, this is the most hilarious thing I've ever seen.
Ahhhh..... That's just great, isn't it
I love media
didn't have to out me like this
that applies to many people here, I fail to see your point
um so back to the 4th dimension thing
is a 4th dimensional organism able to travel through time, walk through physical objects, create endless space, and read minds?

you might get a better response than asking the discord server populated by third (and less) dimensional organisms
😔 sigh
. . . .Fresh out of high school, huh?
Got your anime pfp ready to stomp everyone with your "factual and logical" mind?
Gonna tell us how economics work too?
are u ok





